Congressional Record—House H3
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
Order Code RL30665 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Role of the House Majority Leader: An Overview Updated April 4, 2006 Walter J. Oleszek Senior Specialist in the Legislative Process Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress The Role of the House Majority Leader: An Overview Summary The majority leader in the contemporary House is second-in-command behind the Speaker of the majority party. Typically, the majority leader functions as the Speaker’s chief lieutenant or “field commander” for day-to-day management of the floor. Although the majority leader’s duties are not especially well-defined, they have evolved to the point where it is possible to spotlight two fundamental and often interlocking responsibilities that orient the majority leader’s work: institutional and party. From an institutional perspective, the majority leader has a number of duties. Scheduling floor business is a prime responsibility of the majority leader. Although scheduling the House’s business is a collective activity of the majority party, the majority leader has a large say in shaping the chamber’s overall agenda and in determining when, whether, how, or in what order legislation is taken up. In addition, the majority leader is active in constructing winning coalitions for the party’s legislative priorities; acting as a public spokesman — defending and explaining the party’s program and agenda; serving as an emissary to the White House, especially when the President is of the same party; and facilitating the orderly conduct of the House’s business. From a party perspective, three key activities undergird the majority leader’s principal goal of trying to ensure that the party remains in control of the House. -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 155 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2009 No. 32 House of Representatives The House met at 10:30 a.m. the American people today and tonight But people do count in this adminis- f was really there, waiting on the desk tration—finally. The UI benefits will when he got to the Oval Office. He help those who have lost their jobs. MORNING-HOUR DEBATE didn’t bring it with him. He didn’t have There is a payroll deduction that goes The SPEAKER. Pursuant to the very much to do with creating it. He into the average person’s pocket, and order of the House of January 6, 2009, was only in the Senate a short time. It there is going to be, finally, some over- the Chair will now recognize Members was presented to him by the last ad- sight in governing on behalf of the from lists submitted by the majority ministration, and he has now, in just 1 American people, overall, returning and minority leaders for morning-hour month, given us a recovery plan that America to the American people. debate. helps the American people. Above all, I It took 96 months to destroy our f believe the President strikes a very economy. Remember where Mr. Bush delicate balance and walks a very fine, came in. There was a burgeoning sur- THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY PLAN— thin tightrope between economic re- plus. -
The “Regular Order”: a Perspective
The “Regular Order”: A Perspective November 6, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46597 SUMMARY R46597 The “Regular Order”: A Perspective November 6, 2020 Many contemporary lawmakers urge a return to “regular order” lawmaking. In general, the regular order refers to a traditional, committee-centered process of lawmaking, very Walter J. Oleszek much in evidence during most of the 20th century. Today, Congress has evolved to Senior Specialist in become largely a party-centered institution. Committees remain important, but they are American National less important than previously as “gatekeepers” to the floor. This development Government represents a fundamental “then and now” change in the power dynamics of Capitol Hill. Regular order is generally viewed as a systematic, step-by-step lawmaking process that emphasizes the role of committees: bill introduction and referral to committee; the conduct of committee hearings, markups, and reports on legislation; House and Senate floor consideration of committee-reported measures; and the creation of conference committees to resolve bicameral differences. Many Members and commentators view this sequential pattern as the ideal or “best practices” way to craft the nation’s laws. Regular order is a lawmaking process that promotes transparency, deliberation, and the wide participation of Members in policy formulation. Significant deviations from the textbook model of legislating—common in this party-centric period—might be called “irregular,” “nontraditional,” “unorthodox,” or “unconventional” lawmaking. The well- known “Schoolhouse Rock” model of legislating still occurs, but its prominence has declined compared with the rise of newer, party leadership-directed processes. Regular or irregular procedures can successfully be used to translate ideas into laws. -
The Emoluments Clause: an Anti-Federalist Intruder in a Federalis
Hofstra Law Review Volume 24 | Issue 1 Article 2 1995 The molumeE nts Clause: An Anti-Federalist Intruder in a Federalist Constitution John F. O'Connor Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation O'Connor, John F. (1995) "The moE luments Clause: An Anti-Federalist Intruder in a Federalist Constitution," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 24: Iss. 1, Article 2. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol24/iss1/2 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. O'Connor: The Emoluments Clause: An Anti-Federalist Intruder in a Federalis THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE: AN ANTI-FEDERALIST INTRUDER IN A FEDERALIST CONSTITUTION John F O'Connor* As to the exception that [Senators and Representatives] cannot be appointedto offices created by themselves, or the emoluments of which are by themselves increased, it is certainly of little consequence, since they may easily evade it .... Luther Martin' CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................ 91 II. THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE .... 94 A. "No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected"................... 95 1. "No Senator or Representative shall"............ 95 2. "During the Time for which he was elected" ...... 101 B. The Meaning of "Be Appointed".. ................ 104 C. "To any civil Office under the Authority of the United States" . ............................. 106 * Captain, United States Marine Corps. -
House Facilities and Capitol Grounds
CHAPTER 4 House Facilities and Capitol Grounds A. Hall of the House § 1. Control of the Hall of the House Generally § 2. The Electronic Voting System; Legislative Call System § 3. Audio–Visual Broadcast of House Proceedings § 4. Galleries § 5. Admission to the House Floor § 6. Former Members’ Floor Privileges B. Capitol Grounds § 7. The Capitol Complex § 8. House Office Buildings § 9. The Capitol Visitor Center §10. The Senate Chamber Commentary and editing by Andrew S. Neal, J.D. and Max A. Spitzer, J.D., LL.M. 345 VerDate dec 05 2003 15:02 Dec 20, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00361 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 F:\PRECEDIT\WORKING\VOL1WORKING 4474-B VerDate dec 05 2003 15:02 Dec 20, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00362 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 F:\PRECEDIT\WORKING\VOL1WORKING 4474-B House Facilities and Capitol Grounds A. Hall of the House § 1. Control of the Hall of the House Generally The Hall of the House consists of the House Chamber and its galleries, as well as cloakrooms for each party organization. The rules of the House confer wide discretion on the Speaker to administer the Hall of the House. Use of the Hall of the House is governed by various House rules and prece- dents and Federal statutes.(1) Clause 3 of rule I(2) provides that, ‘‘[t]he Speaker shall have general control of the Hall of the House, the corridors and passages in the part of the Capitol assigned to the use of the House, and the disposal of unappropriated rooms in that part of the Capitol.’’ Clause 1 of rule IV(3) provides that the Hall of the House shall be used for legislative -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 155 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 No. 126 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Rock Springs Congregational Meth- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- Christ. Until You come, we pray. odist Church has thrived during Dr. pore (Mr. HOLDEN). Amen. Tate’s tenure. The church has grown f f from 35 members when he took the helm 20 years ago to more than 4,600 DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER THE JOURNAL worshippers today. PRO TEMPORE The SPEAKER pro tempore. The The church has put those resources The Speaker pro tempore laid before Chair has examined the Journal of the into the service of God’s people and the the House the following communica- last day’s proceedings and announces church’s community. Every day, Rock tion from the Speaker: to the House his approval thereof. Springs teaches the next generation to Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- live by biblical principles at Rock WASHINGTON, DC, Springs Christian Academy. Dr. Tate’s September 9, 2009. nal stands approved. church also conducts a prison ministry I hereby appoint the Honorable TIM f HOLDEN to act as Speaker pro tempore on and a nursing home ministry, and it this day. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE sponsors a medical clinic for the unin- NANCY PELOSI, The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the sured. Georgia’s Third District is privi- Speaker of the House of Representatives. -
The First Day of a New Congress: a Guide to Proceedings on the House Floor
The First Day of a New Congress: A Guide to Proceedings on the House Floor Updated December 7, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL30725 The First Day of a New Congress: A Guide to Proceedings on the House Floor Summary Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution sets a term of office of two years for all Members of the House. One House ends at the conclusion of each two-year Congress, and the newly elected Representatives must constitute a new House at the beginning of the next Congress. Consequently, the House must choose its Speaker and officers and adopt the chamber’s rules of procedure every two years. The Constitution mandates that Congress convene at noon on January 3, unless the preceding Congress by law designated a different day. For example, P.L. 113-201 set January 6, 2015, as the convening date of the 114th Congress. Congressional leaders planned that the 115th Congress would convene January 3, 2017, and that the 116th Congress would convene January 3, 2019, obviating the need for a law to set the date. Although no officers will have been elected when the House first convenes, officers from the previous Congress perform certain functions, such as conducting the election of the Speaker. The House follows a well-established first-day routine. The proceedings include— a call to order by the Clerk of the House; a prayer led by the Chaplain and the Pledge of Allegiance led by the Clerk; a quorum call ordered by the Clerk; the election of the Speaker, ordered by the Clerk and conducted with the assistance of tellers; remarks by the Speaker-elect, followed by his or her swearing-in by the dean of the House; the oath of office for the newly elected and re-elected Members, administered by the Speaker; adoption of the rules of the House for the new Congress; adoption of various administrative resolutions and unanimous consent agreements; and announcement of the Speaker’s policies on certain floor practices. -
Impeachment Powers
CHAPTER 14 Impeachment Powers A. Generally § 1. Constitutional Provisions; House and Senate Func- tions § 2. Who May Be Impeached; Effect of Resignation § 3. Grounds for Impeachment; Form of Articles § 4. Effect of Adjournment B. Investigation and Impeachment § 5. Introduction and Referral of Charges § 6. Committee Investigations § 7. Committee Consideration; Reports § 8. Consideration and Debate in the House § 9. Presentation to Senate; Managers § 10. Replication; Amending Adopted Articles C. Trial in the Senate § 11. Organization and Rules § 12. Conduct of Trial § 13. Voting; Deliberation and Judgment D. History of Proceedings § 14. Charges Not Resulting in Impeachment § 15. Impeachment Proceedings Against President Nixon § 16. Impeachment of Judge English § 17. Impeachment of Judge Louderback § 18. Impeachment of Judge Ritter Appendix Commentary and editing by Peter D. Robinson. J.D. 1939 Ch. 14 DESCHLER’S PRECEDENTS INDEX TO PRECEDENTS Adjournment sine die, effect on im- Charges not resulting in impeach- peachment proceedings ment—Cont. authority of managers following expi- Perkins, Frances, Secretary of Labor, ration of Congress, § 4.2 adverse report by committee, § 14.9 impeachment in one Congress and trial Truman, Harry, President, charges not in the next, § 4.1 acted on, §§ 14.11, 14.12 investigation in one Congress and im- Watson, Albert, judge, charges not peachment in the next, §§ 4.3, 4.4 acted on, § 14.10 Amending articles of impeachment Committee consideration and report privilege of resolution reported by broadcast of committee -
Congressional Record—House H2860
H2860 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE April 30, 2008 When not being a parish pastor, Rev. The gentleman from Massachusetts The Prime Minister of Ireland, es- Meador enjoys officiating high school (Mr. MARKEY); corted by the committee of Senators and youth athletics and playing golf. The gentleman from Massachusetts and Representatives, entered the Hall Welcome, Nathan. (Mr. NEAL); of the House of Representatives and f The gentlewoman from New York stood at the Clerk’s desk. (Mrs. MALONEY); [Applause, the Members rising.] ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER The gentleman from Rhode Island The SPEAKER. Members of Con- PRO TEMPORE (Mr. KENNEDY); gress, I have the high privilege and the The SPEAKER pro tempore. After The gentleman from New York (Mr. distinct honor of presenting to you His consultation among the Speaker and CROWLEY); Excellency Bertie Ahern, the the majority and minority leaders, and The gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Taoiseach, Prime Minister of Ireland. with their consent, the Chair an- BOEHNER); [Applause, the Members rising.] nounces that, when the two Houses The gentleman from Missouri (Mr. meet in joint meeting to hear an ad- BLUNT); f dress by His Excellency Bertie Ahern, The gentleman from Florida (Mr. PUTNAM); Prime Minister of Ireland, only the ADDRESS BY HIS EXCELLENCY doors immediately opposite the Speak- The gentleman from Michigan (Mr. MCCOTTER); BERTIE AHERN, THE PRIME MIN- er and those immediately to her left ISTER OF IRELAND and right will be open. The gentlewoman from Florida (Ms. No one will be allowed on the floor of ROS-LEHTINEN); Prime Minister AHERN. Madam the House who does not have the privi- The gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. -
The Ineligibility Clause's Lost History: Presidential Patronage and Congress, 1787–1850
THE INELIGIBILITY CLAUSE’S LOST HISTORY: PRESIDENTIAL PATRONAGE AND CONGRESS, 1787–1850 Few current constitutional provisions are considered less relevant than the Ineligibility Clause,1 which renders a member of Congress (MC) ineligible for appointment to any federal civil office that has been created or had its emoluments increased during the MC’s elected term. Republican and Democratic administrations, characterizing the clause as incoherent and asserting that the policy behind it was easily evaded by appointment to preexisting office, have restricted the clause to its narrowest, most formalistic meaning.2 The “Saxbe fix,” through which Congress removes an MC’s ineligibility by reducing an office’s salary,3 is another example of confining the clause’s applicability. Some commentators have even advocated reading the clause out of the Constitution.4 Labeled “obscure”5 and “esoteric,”6 the clause has large- ly disappeared from public debate. Yet its contemporary irrelevance obscures how significant the Ineli- gibility Clause once was. During the Republic’s first six decades, Presidents, MCs, and commentators debated not whether the clause should be evaded or ignored, but rather whether its prohibition should be expanded to achieve its broader purposes. Designed to preserve the separation of powers, legislative accountability, and MCs’ disinterest- edness by inhibiting office hunting, the clause, Justice Story reported, had been deemed an “admirable provision against venality, though not perhaps sufficiently guarded to prevent evasion.”7 Given the evasion ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 1 U.S. CONST. art. I, § 6, cl. 2 (“No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time.”). -
Judicial Salaries (4)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R
The original documents are located in Box 21, folder “Judicial Salaries (4)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 21 of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON November 25, 1975 MEMO FOR: PHIL BUCHEN .- FROM: KEN LAZARUS Attached are: (1) A briefing paper on judicial salaries which was prepared by OMB pursuant to our request. (2) The report of the House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service, published two weeks ago, which supplements the briefing paper (see especially pp 14-15 ). Do you need any additional material? Attachments .:SRIEFING PAPER ON JUDICIAL SALARIES Most of the top officials of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the Federal Government are paid under the Executive Level salary schedule. The present rates are shown in Attachment A. As shown in that attachment: -- the salary of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is currently $65,600--the same as the Vice President. -
Why Our Next President May Keep His Or Her Senate Seat: a Conjecture on the Constitution's Incompatibility Clause
WHY OUR NEXT PRESIDENT MAY KEEP HIS OR HER SENATE SEAT: A CONJECTURE ON THE CONSTITUTION'S INCOMPATIBILITY CLAUSE SETH BARRETT TILLMAN* In a few months, "We the People" will go to the polls and elect the electors who will elect (or, at least, have an opportunity to elect1) the next President of the United States. Short of an act of God or an act of war, the next President will be a sitting United States Senator.2 The expectation is that a Senator/President-elect resigns his or her legislative seat (or that resignation of the Senate seat happens by operation of law) some time prior to (or in consequence of) taking the presidential oath of office. The widely held view in large and influential academic circles,3 and among the educated public generally, * Seth Barrett Tillman is a law clerk to the Honorable Malachy E. Mannion, Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The views expressed are solely my own. I would like to thank Christine S. Patrick, Associate Editor at The Papers of George Washington, and the editors at the First Federal Congress Project who have generously given me the benefit of their time and advice. Furthermore I thank Dean Essary and the faculty at the Campbell University School of Law and Dean Saxton and the faculty at the Quinnipiac University School of Law for having given me the opportunity to present earlier versions of this paper. 1. See U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1, cl. 3, amended by U.S. CONST.