DOCSLIB.ORG

True North, the Intertextual Dialogue of Frankenstein's Polar Plot

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
True North, the Intertextual Dialogue of Frankenstein's Polar Plot TRUE NORTH The Intertextual Dialogue of Frankenstein’s Polar Plot Jean Li Spencer Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite for Honors in English Under the Advisement of Marilyn Sides May 2021 © 2021 Jean Li Spencer 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................(3) Part I: Locating Frankenstein’s Polar Plot in a Larger Conversation …………………………...(5) Part II: Coleridgean Ice and Frost ..............................................................................................(28) Part III: Traveling Shelleys .........................................................................................................(63) Epilogue .....................................................................................................................................(76) Bibliography ...............................................................................................................................(78) 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many years before I began writing this thesis, I was fortunate enough to travel from Argentina–across the turbulent and dangerous Drake Passage–to Antarctica, on a trip dedicated to climate change awareness. Naked with wind, biologically and oceanographically lush, and tantalizing as outer space, the Antarctic is otherworldly. It is one of the most vulnerable and ephemeral, yet entirely imposing, places I have ever been– for the Antarctic may seem indomitable, but within a matter of days, the landscape will shift and change irrevocably and without signal; metamorphosing quickly and dangerously. The polar landscape is exactly the “region of beauty and delight” (7) that Mary Shelley describes, but it also harbors the threat of an “[early] grave amidst” a “scene of desolation” (154).1 Unlike in the populated setting of Chamonix, a favorite vacation destination of Mary Shelley’s in France, there are no sweet Alpine cottages, no reprieve in the mossy palette of pine trees or easy distraction in fashionable winter sport. Standing on the snowy bank of some mountain nearby an abandoned whaling station, I never felt so small– a pinprick of matter in the 1 Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, and J. Paul Hunter. Frankenstein: The 1818 Text, Contexts, Criticism. 2nd ed, W.W. Norton & Co, 2012. 3 cosmos. It is from my own polar trip that my appreciation of Mary Shelley’s Arctic descriptions originates. I owe a debt of gratitude not to a person, but to a place. Without this opportunity to travel Southwards, I may have never been drawn to the polar elements in Mary Shelley’s novel. I would like to give my eternal thanks to Professor Marilyn Sides, without whom this project would have never started. It means more than I can say that you took me on as your advisee in the strangest of years, and in the wildest circumstances, even though we did not know each other before. I am so lucky and grateful to you for the time you gave me whenever I requested it, and for your lengthy editorial notes on my finished draft. To get your personal attention is quite special indeed, and I have come out a better writer for it. Special thanks to the professors who read my work and offered their expertise and feedback: Tim Peltason, Alison Hickey, and Mingwei Song. You have been part of my journey at Wellesley in important, lovely, and profound ways. I am honored by your help on this project. My appreciation to Professor Tracy Ware at Queen’s University in Ontario, Canada, for corresponding with me about Samuel Taylor Coleridge and English Romanticism, and for connecting me with Ian MacLaren, who directed me to critical reading material. I am greatly indebted to you both. You were sources of clarity in the general lack of scholarship surrounding Coleridge’s polar knowledge and “Frost at Midnight”; thank you for filling that puzzling gap. Thank you also to my dads, who knew that Wellesley was the place where I might grow and challenge myself. You have encouraged my lifelong joy in reading, and your care for me is boundless. Thank you to my partner, Brendan, for his unconditional love and total belief in my skills as a writer. And thank you to my senior year blockmates–Sam, Maddie, Hunter, and Macy–who supported me whenever I felt overwhelmed, and told me not to toss my writing in the trash because I had already come so far. It really does take a village (or a dorm). 4 PART I: Locating Frankenstein’s Polar Plot in a Larger Conversation 5 Origins Mary Shelley, who wrote her most famous novel Frankenstein at the young age of eighteen, was perhaps always destined to be a great writer. Mary held pen to paper throughout her life: one might argue that she even expected herself to do so as the daughter of two celebrated literary and political figures of the nineteenth century. Through William Godwin’s and Mary Wollstonecraft’s library, and her own ambitiously self-directed studies growing up, she became the author of a novel that helped write women novelists into the British literary marketplace. To this day Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley (1797-1851) holds a firm position at the intersection of contemporary gender and literary studies, and is often regarded as the mother of the science fiction genre. But to strip all that down and to read Frankenstein in an early nineteenth-century context is a richly rewarding exercise. Indeed, what is so interesting about Mary Shelley’s commentary on early nineteenth century literary conventions and themes is that she, more than any other woman writer of the day, was positioned tightly between the great male writers of England: William Godwin, Charles Lamb, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Lord Byron, and of course, the great poet Percy Shelley (her lover and husband). Rather than suffocate under the intense challenge of these men, Mary Shelley–who was never properly educated the way a son would have been (she was mostly self-taught)–rose to the occasion to write a great work of literature that is far better remembered and inscribed in the modern cultural imagination than any of her male contemporaries. I posit that to appreciate certain overlooked elements of the story–mainly, that of the Polar narrative, which opens and closes the novel–we must understand Frankenstein in an early 6 nineteenth century context. For Mary Shelley takes polar elements from her real life travels, the contemporary public polar fascination, and from selected poems by Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Percy Shelley, to inform Robert Walton’s expedition to the Arctic and the “Sea of Ice,” where Victor Frankenstein and his creature face off. The implications of my conclusions are limited to the polar theme in Frankenstein because it is an integral thread that ties the novel together, and is perhaps even the most important narrative thread of the novel, as it is the one that makes cohesive her opinions about the conventions of creative/artistic genius in literary tradition. The polar theme also writes Mary Shelley into a larger contemporaneous scientific and literary conversation, one that dramatizes elements of horror within the novel to turn it into a book concerned with morality and pathos. Mary Shelley was known to have kept personal diaries throughout her life, detailing not only the daily events and conversations she thought worthy enough to keep an account of, but also the reading material she engaged with. Unfortunately, any kind of record by Mary Shelley from the period in which she wrote Frankenstein does not exist, and so I would like to propose that not only was the Arctic more than a peripheral element of the book–which is how the polar theme has largely been viewed– but also that Frankenstein’s polar theme is one such monumental clue to piecing together the history of how this enduring novel came to be. This thesis attempts to tell the story, so far as I understand it, of the origins of Frankenstein’s polar elements, and its turn–its glacial Alpine stretch–in three remarkably influential works. Two of them, The Rime of the Ancient Mariner (1798) and “Frost at Midnight” (1798), preceded Mary Shelley and were written by Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772–1834), the famed poet who was also a regular childhood visitor at the Godwin house and one of Mary’s enduring poetic idols. The other work, History of a Six Weeks’ Tour, is a memoir and travelogue 7 that includes “Mont Blanc.” History of a Six Weeks’ Tour (1817) is co-authored by Mary and Percy Shelley, bringing together works by each writer in one volume. Within this ripe body of source material is a strong fixation with the polar regions and its scientific and literary potential. The fascination with the North Pole makes sense if we consider that Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Percy Shelley, and Mary Shelley were writing at a time where there was already more than half a century’s worth of popular, scientific, and empirical interest in Arctic exploration and in voyages of discovery. I chose these three works to ground my research because their icy climes, dizzying heights, and icebergs line the road that leads to Frankenstein. Percy Shelley was an integral supporter, editor, and advocate for his wife’s novel, helping to bring it to “full term” over the nine months that the couple dedicated to “drafting, expanding, and fair-copying.” He furthermore presented it to the public on Mary’s behalf on publication day, 1 January 1818.2 An integral figure indeed was Percy Shelley. Percy Shelley (1792–1822) occupies a sometimes contrapuntal, yet also complimentary, role in the writing of Frankenstein; but he was more than Mary’s editor and reviser, he was truly her creative partner. Likewise, what cannot be overlooked is the fact that Mary utilized Frankenstein as a clever way to facilitate an intellectual and philosophical conversation with Percy Shelley about topics that interested them both greatly–science and philosophy–in the literary mode that suited their prolific artistic talents. The conversations Mary had with Percy were fertile sites of material for her. Based on what we know of Mary Shelley’s life, the shadow of these brilliant men cast themselves strongly across her 2 Robinson, Charles E.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impermanence / Mutability: Reading Percy Bysshe
    IMPERMANENCE / MUTABILITY: READING PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY’S POETRY THROUGH BUDDHA Leila Hajjari Persian Gulf University [email protected] Zahra Soltani Sarvestani Persian Gulf University [email protected] Received: 22 May 2020 Accepted: 1 February 2021 Abstract As an ongoing phenomenon, the impermanence of the world has been observed by many people, both in ancient and modern times, in the East and in the West. Two of these authors are Gautama Buddha (an ancient, eastern philosopher from the 6th-5th centuries B.C.) and Percy Bysshe Shelley (a modern Western poet: 1792-1822). The aim of this paper is to examine in the light of Buddhist philosophy what impermanence means or looks in a selection of Shelley’s poems, after considering that this philosophy was not alien to the Europeans of the 18th and 19th centuries. Buddhism, seeing impermanence (anicca) as the foundation of the world, both acquiesces to it and urges the individuals to sway with its ebb and flow. Shelley mainly falters in the incorporation of the phenomenon into his mindset and his poems. However, he often shows a casual acceptance of it; and even, in a few cases, he presents it with a positive assessment. Keywords: Buddhism, Shelley, impermanence, mutability, transience, anicca Littera Aperta 5 (2017): 19-37. ISSN: 2341-0663 20 Leila Hajjari – Zahra Soltani Sarvestani TRANSITORIEDAD / MUTABILIDAD: LECTURA DE LA POESÍA DE PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY A TRAVÉS DE BUDA Resumen La transitoriedad del mundo ha sido considerada un concepto relevante por muchos autores antiguos y modernos, tanto en el este como en el oeste. Dos de estos autores son Gautama Buda (ss.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Poetics of Becoming: Samuel Taylor Coleridge's and John Keats's Aesthetics Between Idealism and Deconstruction
    Towards a Poetics of Becoming: Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s and John Keats’s Aesthetics Between Idealism and Deconstruction Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Philosophischen Fakultät IV (Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaften) der Universität Regensburg eingereicht von Charles NGIEWIH TEKE Alfons-Auer-Str. 4 93053 Regensburg Februar 2004 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Rainer EMIG Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Dieter A. BERGER 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE DEDICATION .............................................................................................................. I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................... VI English........................................................................................................................ VI German...................................................................................................................... VII French...................................................................................................................... VIII INTRODUCTION Aims of the Study......................................................................................................... 1 On the Relationship Between S. T. Coleridge and J. Keats.......................................... 5 Certain Critical Terms................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Shelley: Teaching and Learning Through Frankenstein Theresa M
    Forum on Public Policy Mary Shelley: Teaching and Learning through Frankenstein Theresa M. Girard, Adjunct Professor, Central Michigan University Abstract In the writing of Frankenstein, Mary Shelley was able to change the course of women’s learning, forever. Her life started from an elite standpoint as the child of Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin. As such, she was destined to grow to be a major influence in the world. Mary Shelley’s formative years were spent with her father and his many learned friends. Her adult years were spent with her husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and their literary friends. It was on the occasion of the Shelleys’ visit to Lord Byron at his summer home that Mary Shelley was to begin her novel which changed the course of women’s ideas about safety and the home. No longer were women to view staying in the home as a means to staying safe and secure. While women always knew that men could be unreliable, Mary Shelley openly acknowledged that fact and provided a forum from which it could be discussed. Furthermore, women learned that they were vulnerable and that, in order to insure their own safety, they could not entirely depend upon men to rescue them; in fact, in some cases, women needed to save themselves from the men in their lives, often with no one to turn to except themselves and other women. There are many instances where this is shown throughout Frankenstein, such as: Justine’s prosecution and execution and Elizabeth’s murder. Mary Shelley educated women in the most fundamental of ways and continues to do so through every reading of Frankenstein.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Thought and Subjectivity in Percy Bysshe Shelley's Poetry
    Systemic Thought and Subjectivity in Percy Bysshe Shelley‟s Poetry Sabrina Palan Systemic Thought and Subjectivity in Percy Bysshe Shelley’s Poetry Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung eines akademischen Grades einer Magistra der Philosophie an der Karl- Franzens Universität Graz vorgelegt von Sabrina PALAN am Institut für Anglistik Begutachter: Ao.Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr.phil. Martin Löschnigg Graz, 2017 1 Systemic Thought and Subjectivity in Percy Bysshe Shelley‟s Poetry Sabrina Palan Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich erkläre an Eides statt, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und ohne fremde Hilfe verfasst, andere als die angegebenen Quellen nicht benutzt und die den benutzen Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht habe. Überdies erkläre ich, dass dieses Diplomarbeitsthema bisher weder im In- noch im Ausland in irgendeiner Form als Prüfungsarbeit vorgelegt wurde und dass die Diplomarbeit mit der vom Begutachter beurteilten Arbeit übereinstimmt. Sabrina Palan Graz, am 27.02.2017 2 Systemic Thought and Subjectivity in Percy Bysshe Shelley‟s Poetry Sabrina Palan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 5 2. Romanticism – A Shift in Sensibilities .................................................................................. 8 2.1 Etymology of the Term “Romantic” ............................................................................. 9 2.2 A Portrait of a Cultural Period .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fashioning Frankenstein: a Fundamentalist Experiment in Edenic After-Tastes
    Vassar College Digital Window @ Vassar Senior Capstone Projects 2019 Fashioning Frankenstein: a fundamentalist experiment in edenic after-tastes Haley Hill Vassar College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone Recommended Citation Hill, Haley, "Fashioning Frankenstein: a fundamentalist experiment in edenic after-tastes" (2019). Senior Capstone Projects. 871. https://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone/871 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Window @ Vassar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Window @ Vassar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hill 1 Fashioning Frankenstein: A Fundamentalist Experiment in Edenic After-tastes Haley Hill Leslie Dunn Fall Semester 2018 Introduction Hill 2 In regards to Genesis, it can be said of Eve that: at the core of her story’s overarching narrative lies the creation of man. Made in the mold of a set of ideals, he works, in isolation, to make sense of his environment. Yet: drawn from the rib of his own desires, he, himself, inadvertently creates corruption within his world, damning himself to an irreversible reality of death, despair, and, ultimately, the triumphant damnation of decay from which alone his soul may finally split off from his rotten form. In regards to Mary Shelley’s most infamous novel, it can be said that: at the core of her story’s overarching chaos lies yet another creation of man. However, made in the
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Man"
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2016 Renegotiating the Apocalypse: Mary Shelley’s "The Last Man" Kathryn Joan Darling College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Darling, Kathryn Joan, "Renegotiating the Apocalypse: Mary Shelley’s "The Last Man"" (2016). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 908. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/908 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 The apocalypse has been written about as many times as it hasn’t taken place, and imagined ever since creation mythologies logically mandated destructive counterparts. Interest in the apocalypse never seems to fade, but what does change is what form that apocalypse is thought to take, and the ever-keen question of what comes after. The most classic Western version of the apocalypse, the millennial Judgement Day based on Revelation – an absolute event encompassing all of humankind – has given way in recent decades to speculation about political dystopias following catastrophic war or ecological disaster, and how the remnants of mankind claw tooth-and-nail for survival in the aftermath. Desolate landscapes populated by cannibals or supernatural creatures produce the awe that sublime imagery, like in the paintings of John Martin, once inspired. The Byronic hero reincarnates in an extreme version as the apocalyptic wanderer trapped in and traversing a ruined world, searching for some solace in the dust.
    [Show full text]
  • The Many Conversations of This Lime-Tree Bower
    From The Coleridge Bulletin The Journal of the Friends of Coleridge New Series 26 (NS) Winter 2005 © 2005 Contributor all rights reserved http://www.friendsofcoleridge.com/Coleridge-Bulletin.htm Agreement, Dissonance, Dissent: The Many Conversations of ‘This Lime-Tree Bower’ Felicity James ____________________________________________________________________________________________ N THIS TALK I want to touch on some of the many conversations going Ion inside and around ‘This Lime-Tree Bower’; firstly, the conversations— and the conflicts—between friends which shape the poem. Much has been said about the rich biographical and literary interconnections of this poem, and, in particular, its position in the Wordsworth-Coleridge relationship—the way in which, for example, it subtly re-reads and, in Lucy Newlyn’s words, ‘strategically correct[s]’ Wordsworth’s ‘Lines left upon a seat in a Yew-tree’.1 Lynda Pratt, too, has shown us how the poem ‘embarks on a literal and metaphorical rewriting’ of Southey poems such as the ‘Inscription III: For a Cavern that overlooks the River Avon’, the ‘Botany-Bay Eclogue’ ‘Elinor’, and the ‘Ode. Written on the First of January 1794’.2 Today, though, I want to look again at the poem through the lens of an earlier Coleridgean relationship: with the ‘gentle-hearted’ Charles Lamb. Everyone here will know that famous remonstrance made by Lamb in letters of 1800, just after his reconciliation with Coleridge, when he tells him not to ‘make me ridiculous any more by terming me gentle-hearted in print’3—‘please to blot out gentle hearted, and substitute drunken dog, ragged-head, seld-shaven, odd-ey’d, stuttering, or any other epithet which truly and properly belongs to the Gentleman in question’.4 I want to restore Lamb’s sometimes dissonant voice to this conversation poem, and to suggest that, just as he occupies the central, turning point of the poem itself, so too, in that self-deprecating complaint, Lamb gets right to the heart of some central Coleridgean dilemmas in ‘This Lime Tree Bower’.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Questions for Frankenstein Written by Hailey Toporcer, Hiram College Class of 2019 Edited by Prof
    Discussion Questions for Frankenstein Written by Hailey Toporcer, Hiram College Class of 2019 Edited by Prof. Kirsten Parkinson As you read Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, either on your own or with a group, we invite you to use these questions to add layers to your discussion or thinking about the novel. The first section includes questions for each chapter of the novel; you will find questions reflecting on the book as a whole at the end. We have not included specific pages numbers as various editions have different page numbers, but the quotations are based on the 1831 edition of the novel. Discussion Questions for Each Chapter Letters I through IV 1. Frankenstein begins and ends with letters written by Robert Walton. Why do you think that Mary Shelley chose to have him frame the novel? How would your opinions of Victor Frankenstein and his creation differ if their story was told directly by Victor Frankenstein himself? What if the story was told solely by the creation? 2. Walton yearns for a friend, much like Victor Frankenstein’s creature does. What does this tell you about human nature? Is it in our nature to want companionship, someone to confide in, and someone to care for? 3. In Letter IV, Walton writes, “Yesterday the stranger said to me, “You may easily perceive, Captain Walton, that I have suffered great and unparalleled misfortunes. I had determined at one time that the memory of these evils should die with me, but you have won me to alter my determination. You seek for knowledge and wisdom, as I once did; and I ardently hope that the gratification of your wishes may not be a serpent to sting you, as mine has been.
    [Show full text]
  • Categorizing Humans, Animals, and Machines in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2009 Categorizing Humans, Animals, and Machines in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Martha Bellows University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Bellows, Martha, "Categorizing Humans, Animals, and Machines in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein" (2009). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 129. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/129http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/129 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Martha Bellows Major: English and Spanish Email: [email protected] Title of Project: Categorizing Humans, Animals, and Machines in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Galen Johnson Abstract From Plato to Descartes and Kant and now to modern day, there is a general idea that pervades Western society. This idea is about the uniqueness and superiority of the human being. We are rational and conscious beings that apparently stand alone in the world, separated intellectually from animals and biologically from machines. The relationship between humans, animals, and machines is a tumultuous one and it is not easily definable. For many classical philosophers, this relationship has always been a hierarchy. Humans are on the top and animals and machines fall somewhere below. These beliefs have created a distinct category for the three terms that leaves no room for overlap.
    [Show full text]
  • Frankenstein's Theatrical Doppelgänger
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013-08-27 From Prometheus to Presumption: Frankenstein's Theatrical Doppelgänger Reid, Brittany Lee Alexandra Reid, B. L. (2013). From Prometheus to Presumption: Frankenstein's Theatrical Doppelgänger (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/26236 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/894 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY From Prometheus to Presumption: Frankenstein’s Theatrical Doppelgänger by Brittany Reid A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH CALGARY, ALBERTA AUGUST, 2013 © Brittany Reid 2013 ii Abstract This thesis examines the Doppelgänger relationship between Victor Frankenstein and the Creature, as it is characterized through both Frankenstein and its first theatrical adaptation. With a specific focus on Richard Brinsley Peake’s 1823 gothic melodrama, Presumption; or, The Fate of Frankenstein I unpack how the novel’s cross-medium adaptation leads to a changed conception of the relationship of its central characters. In Frankenstein, Victor is the focal figure and acts as the Creature’s dominant counterpart. However, the characters’ cross-medium adaptation from page to stage inverts this Doppelgänger relationship from Shelley’s initial conception in the novel.
    [Show full text]
  • Messenger Team Please Email Articles / Photos to [email protected]
    CLUBS & SOCIETIES IN NETHER STOWEY & OVER STOWEY Allotment Association Over Stowey Rights of Way Group Bruce Roper 732 043 Richard Ince 733 237 Active Living Group Over Stowey Social Club Call 734 613 or 733 040; 733 151; 732 609 Sue Thomas 732 905 Coleridge Probus Club Over Stowey Tennis Court Philip Comer (01984) 656 720 Liz Onions 732 195 Coleridge Cottage Quantock AONB Office, Fyne Court Tel: 732 662 Tel: (01823) 451 884 Friends of Coleridge Quantock Beekeepers Association Eliza Sackett 733 660 Ken Edwards 671 544 Thomas Poole Library, Nether Stowey Quantock Players Sian Stafford 732 741 Wendy Hobbs 733 197 Friends of Over Stowey Church Quantock Quilters Christopher Stone 732 907 Gill Griffiths 733 709 Friends of Quantock Quantock Tennis Club Robin Bendall 732 633 Mary ter Braak (01984) 656 633 Royal British Legion - N/Stowey & District Friends of Nether Stowey School Viki Fielder 238 691 Lisa Rendle 732 508 Stogursey Forget-Me-Not Cafe Nether Stowey Football Club Helen Cuttell 734 818 Chair: Nigel Waterman 732 310 Stowey Green Spaces Group Seniors: Steve Easden 07788 370014 Judith Greig 732 483 Juniors: Nigel Waterman 732 310 Stowey Walking Minis: Richard Marriott 07890 451694 Lynne Abbott 732 228 Nether Stowey Playing Fields Committee The Quantock Musical Theatre Co. Jane Erskine 732 025 Brian Williams 732 325 Nether Stowey Short Mat Bowls Stowey Bears (pre-school) Cath Roberts 732 789 Tina Miller 734 636 Nether Stowey Twinning Association Stowey Book Club Open to everyone. Ian Pearson 732 228 Alison Whittingham 732 446 Nether
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost Boy: Hartley Coleridge As a Symbol of Romantic Division
    Halsall, Martyn (2009) The Lost Boy: Hartley Coleridge as a Symbol of Romantic Division. In: Research FEST 2009, July 2009, University of Cumbria. Downloaded from: http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/840/ Usage of any items from the University of Cumbria’s institutional repository ‘Insight’ must conform to the following fair usage guidelines. Any item and its associated metadata held in the University of Cumbria’s institutional repository Insight (unless stated otherwise on the metadata record) may be copied, displayed or performed, and stored in line with the JISC fair dealing guidelines (available here) for educational and not-for-profit activities provided that • the authors, title and full bibliographic details of the item are cited clearly when any part of the work is referred to verbally or in the written form • a hyperlink/URL to the original Insight record of that item is included in any citations of the work • the content is not changed in any way • all files required for usage of the item are kept together with the main item file. You may not • sell any part of an item • refer to any part of an item without citation • amend any item or contextualise it in a way that will impugn the creator’s reputation • remove or alter the copyright statement on an item. The full policy can be found here. Alternatively contact the University of Cumbria Repository Editor by emailing [email protected]. The Lost Boy: Hartley Coleridge as a Symbol of Romantic Division. Dr Martyn Halsall Late one freezing evening in 1798 the writer Samuel Taylor Coleridge was completing a poem.
    [Show full text]