DOCSLIB.ORG

West Raglan Technical Report Northern Québec, Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Raglan Technical Report Northern Québec, Canada West Raglan Technical Report Northern Québec, Canada Respectfully submitted to: True North Nickel Inc. and Royal Nickel Corporation Effective Date: June 30th 2014 Prepared By: Guy Desharnais Ph.D., P.Geo Dennis Arne Ph.D., P.Geo Craig Bow Ph.D., P.Geo West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page iii I, Craig S. Bow, of 9011 Cascade Ave, Beulah, Colorado, do hereby certify that: I am an Independent Consulting Geologist, at the above address. This certificate regards the technical report entitled West Raglan Technical Report, Northern Québec, Canada, with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Technical Report”). I graduated from the Washington and Lee University in 1971 with a B.S. degree in Geology, and from the University of Oregon in 1979 with a Ph.D. in Geology. I am a Certified Professional Geologist # 08250 of the American Institute of Professional Geologists. I am a Fellow of the Society of Economic Geologists. th I conducted exploration and geologic mapping on the West Raglan Project between August 9 and 27th, 2013. I have practiced my profession continuously since 1979, and have wide-ranging experience in greenfields exploration, prospect evaluation, advanced project development, and exploration management. In the latter capacity I served as Exploration Manager, South America for Newcrest Mining, and as Exploration Manager, North America for Gold Fields. I am the author of several publications on subjects relating to the metals exploration industry. I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43- 101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101. I am the author of sections 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 18, and 20, and the relevant parts of section 26, of the Technical Report. I am not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the subject matter of the Technical Report that is not reflected in the Technical Report, the omission to disclose which makes the Technical Report misleading. I am independent of True North Nickel Inc and Royal Nickel Corporation and any of their subsidiary companies applying all of the tests in section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101. I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with that Instrument and Form. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the parts of the Technical Report that I am responsible for contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the report not misleading. Dated this 28th day of July, 2014 “Craig S. Bow” CPG SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report - Northern Quebec, Canada Page iv I, Dennis Arne, of Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that: a) I currently work as a geoscientist for CSA Global Canada Geoscience Ltd - with an office located at Suite 610, 1 155 West Render Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 2P4; b) This certificate regards the technical report entitled "West Raglan Technical Report, Northern Quebec, Canada" with an effective date of June 30th, 2014 (the "Technical Report"); c) I have a B.Sc. honours degree in geology from the University of Regina, a M.Sc. in geology from Lakehead University, a Ph.D. in earth sciences from The University of Melbourne, Australia and a graduate diploma in Hydrogeology and Groundwater Management from the University of Technology - Sydney, Australia. I have worked in mineral exploration and geochemistry for more than 10 years, including several massive sulphide Ni-Cu-PGE exploration programs. I am a registered member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia (#34686), the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (#2344) and a Professional Geoscientist with the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. I am a "Qualified Person" for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 (the "Instrument"); d) I visited the West Raglan property between July 26th to August 5th, 2012; e) I am responsible for sections 1 1 and 12 of the Technical Report; f) I am independent of True North Nickel Inc. and Royal Nickel Corporation as described in section 1 .5 of the Instrument; g) I have had no prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report; h) I have read the Instrument and the sections of the Technical Report that I am responsible for, which have been prepared in compliance with the Instrument; and i) As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the parts of the Technical Report that I am responsible for, contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading. r Signed, sealed<attf ffite^this 28th day of July, 2014 at Vancouver, British Columbia. _fF_ °r. D. C. ARNE # 34S86 "Dennis A? Ph.D., P.Geo^ft§fii5fl&6onsultant - Geochemistry CSA Global Canada Geosciences Ltd. SGS Canada Inc. SGS West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page v Table of Contents 1 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Property .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Exploration and Drilling Activity ...................................................................................... 3 1.3 Geology.......................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 4 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Terms of Reference ....................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Currency, Units, abbreviations and Definitions ............................................................... 7 2.4 Disclaimer ...................................................................................................................... 7 3 Reliance on Other Experts .................................................................................................... 8 4 Property Description and Location ........................................................................................ 8 4.1 Location ......................................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Claim Status and Title ....................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Permits and Environmental Liabilities ........................................................................... 10 5 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography .......................... 11 5.1 Physiography ............................................................................................................... 11 5.2 Accessibility ................................................................................................................. 11 5.3 Climate ......................................................................................................................... 12 5.4 Surface Rights.............................................................................................................. 12 6 History ................................................................................................................................ 14 6.1 Early History ................................................................................................................. 14 6.2 Recent History.............................................................................................................. 15 7 Geological Setting and Mineralization ................................................................................. 17 7.1 Regional Geology ......................................................................................................... 17 7.2 Property Geology ......................................................................................................... 19 7.3 Nickel Mineralization in the Frontier Zone ..................................................................... 21 7.4 Nickel Mineralization in the Cape Smith Belt ................................................................ 24 8 Deposit Types .................................................................................................................... 30 8.1 Ni-Deposits General ..................................................................................................... 30 SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page vi 8.2 Sulphide Ni Deposits .................................................................................................... 30 9 Exploration ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Falconbridge Limited 2003 Annual Report FUNDAMENTAL STRENGTH Our Operations
    Falconbridge Limited 2003 Annual Report FUNDAMENTAL STRENGTH Our Operations NICKEL COPPER CORPORATE 1 Sudbury 6 Compañía Minera Doña Inés de 9 Corporate Office (Sudbury, Ontario) Collahuasi S.C.M. (44%) (Toronto, Ontario) Mines and mills nickel-copper ores; smelts (Northern Chile) 10 Project Offices nickel-copper concentrate from Sudbury’s Mines and mills copper sulphide ores into (Kone and Nouméa, New Caledonia; mines and from Raglan, and processes concentrate; mines and leaches copper Brisbane, Australia) custom feed materials. oxide ores to produce cathodes. 11 Exploration Offices 2 Raglan 7 Kidd Division (Sudbury, Timmins and Toronto, Ontario; (Nunavik, Quebec) (Timmins, Ontario) Laval, Quebec; Pretoria, South Africa; Mines and mills nickel-copper ores from Mines copper-zinc ores from the Kidd Mine. Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Brisbane, open pits and an underground mine. Mills, smelts and refines copper-zinc ores Australia) from the Kidd Mine and processes Sudbury 3 Nikkelverk A/S copper concentrate and custom feed 12 Business Development (Kristiansand, Norway) materials. (Toronto, Ontario) Refines nickel, copper, cobalt, precious and platinum group metals from Sudbury, 8 Compañía Minera Falconbridge 13 Marketing and Sales Raglan and from custom feeds. Lomas Bayas (Brussels, Belgium; Pittsburgh, (Northern Chile) Pennsylvania; Tokyo, Japan) 4 Falconbridge Dominicana, C. por A. Mines copper oxide ores from an open pit; (85.26%) (Bonao, Dominican Republic) refines into copper cathode through the 14 Technology Centre Mines, mills, smelts
    [Show full text]
  • Asbestos Hill Mine in Nunavik
    Seeking Closure: Legacies of the Asbestos Hill mine in Nunavik Jeanette Carney, Memorial University of Newfoundland Masters Thesis Report Asbestos Hill: Inuit Experiences with Nunavik’s First Mine Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………...3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Interviews ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Archives ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Funding and Support .................................................................................................................... 6 Findings ........................................................................................................................................... 6 History .......................................................................................................................................... 6 The Asbestos Hill mine ................................................................................................................. 7 Inuit Work Experiences....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Mining Industry North of the 55Th Parallel: a Maritime Traffic Generator?
    The Canadian Mining Industry North of the 55th parallel: a maritime traffic generator? Abstract Keywords: Arctic, Mining, Canada, Sea Shipping & Transportation, Northwest Passage Introduction Melting summer sea ice in the Arctic has been extensively documented and has increasingly been making headlines. This phenomenon, underlined by scientists and the media since the turn of the century, has triggered speculation on the opening of much shorter sea routes linking Europe via the eastern coast of North America to Asia, as well as on increased access to mineral resources in this region. The Arctic is currently undergoing a change of pace many would not have considered possible only a decade or so ago (Molenaar 2014). Closely integrated into the current economics of globalization, the Arctic region of the 21st century shows a growing worldwide economic, political and scientific interest. It also provides options in relation to energy security (Zhang 2011; Blunden 2012; Huebert and al. 2012; Johnston 2010; 2012) and visions of new transarctic sea routes (Lasserre, 2011; Pelletier and Lasserre 2012; Farré and al. 2014; Heininen 2014). In recent years, the prospect of growing shipping traffic in Arctic waters led to analysis pertaining to the possibilities for expanded activities in the cruise industry (Stewart and al. 2007; Grenier and Müller 2011; Lemelin, Dawson and Stewart 2012; Lasserre and Têtu 2013; Dawson, Johnston and Stewart 2014), the fishing industry (Arctic Council 2009), as well as in cargo shipping for western and Asian commercial shipping companies (Lasserre and Pelletier 2011; Campbell, 2012; Lasserre 2014) It seems, however, that less attention has been paid to the prospect of the mining industry becoming a major maritime traffic generator despite all the attention paid to the oil & gas potential of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • My Administration Régionale Kativik Kativik Regional
    2007 vtF4 kNooμ5 v?mY Administration régionale Kativik Kativik Regional Government kNooμk5 vt1zpq5 vt[4 kNooμ5 v?mzb Council of the Kativik Regional Government Conseil de l’Administration régionale Kativik S3gi3ni vtmº5 Executive Committee Comité administratif μr wm3M4 ÉnC e8kxJx6 GS[3ig6H ÔyW €Ncb6 Gvq3h6H ÷i s{?s5 Gdx3b6H ™ä xs9Ml4 Gxfo[4H Maggie Emudluk Aisara Kenuajuak (Puvirnituq) Joseph Annahatak (Kangirsuk) Johnny Oovaut (Quaqtaq) Eli Aullaluk (Akulivik) grjx3typ grjx3typs2-gzoz Chairperson Vice-Chairperson présidente vice-président xyq5 vt1zº5 Other Councillors Autres conseillers uxp €3z6 Wl3©5 Gvq3hJx6H Mary A. Pilurtuut (Kangiqsujuaq) ˜p Ax5 Gƒ4Jx6H Larry Watt (Kuujjuaq) Wb jxv8 Gvq3hxl4Jx6H Peter Morgan (Kangiqsualujjuaq) Ö[5 ¬vy GxsXl4H David Lucassie (Aupaluk) Wb x3Ng6 Gbys/6H Peter Angnatuk (Tasiujaq) €8t jxcs+ Gwk4Jx6H Andy Moorehouse (Inukjuak) €bu XWv4g6 Gn9lw5H Adamie Papigatuk (Salluit) vwyμ4GwKp[4H Casey Mark (Ivujivik) s÷W gvl4 Gsus/6H Robbie Tookalook (Umiujaq) ¬vy wk4X4 Gƒ5JxÇW4H Lucassie Inukpuk (Kuujjuarapik) WoW ™i+ GvsZsÛ5yμ5+H Phillip Einish (Kawawachikamach) WQx1zizi yMtz: ©3ô cçlq5, ƒD3Jx6 u3awy3[4. Front cover: Torngat Mountains, Kuururjuaq Park Project. Couverture : Les monts Torngat, projet de parc Kuururjuaq. vtF4 KATIVIK 2007 wloq5b hNsiq5 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE DES MATIÈRES grjx3typs2 scsyq5 .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Asbestos Hill: Inuit Experiences with Nunavik’S First Mine
    ASBESTOS HILL: INUIT EXPERIENCES WITH NUNAVIK’S FIRST MINE by © Jeanette Carney A Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Geography Memorial University of Newfoundland October, 2016 St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador ABSTRACT Over the past century, the Canadian north has experienced an economic, social, and environmental transformation due to mineral development projects. These new developments have contributed to the rapid modernization of Aboriginal and Inuit peoples. Research has shown that past mines in the North continue to play a role in northern communities, shaping community identity and leaving behind negative environmental and socio-cultural legacies. As of yet, little social science research has been undertaken on the impacts of mining in Nunavik (northern Québec) and this study is the first to be conducted on the Asbestos Hill mine (1972-1984), Nunavik’s first mine. Using oral history and archival research methods, this thesis examines past Inuit mine workers’ experiences at the mine, the communities of Salluit and Kangiqsujuaq’s encounters with this industrial operation, and the legacies it left behind. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My Master’s thesis has been an incredibly difficult and gratifying experience, which could not have been possible without the support of my mentors, colleagues, family, and friends. Their continual encouragement, empathy, and assistance have helped me persevere throughout the research and writing processes of this Master’s. First, and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Arn Keeling, for his exceptional guidance, insight, and expertise throughout the past two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Mining, Pre-Concentration and Waste Disposal Systems for the Increased Sustainability of Hard Rock Metal Mining
    INTEGRATED MINING, PRE-CONCENTRATION AND WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS FOR THE INCREASED SUSTAINABILITY OF HARD ROCK METAL MINING By ANDREW SHERLIKER BAMBER, B.Sc. (Mechanical Engineering) University of Cape Town, 1993 Pr. Eng. (Engineering Council of South Africa), 1999 M.A.Sc. (Mining & Mineral Processing) University of British Columbia, 2004 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Mining Engineering) UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) April 2008 © Andrew Sherliker Bamber 2008 Abstract In the hard rock metal mining industry, both in Canada and globally, a decreasing number of economic mineral deposits are found at shallow to medium depth, and most of the deposits that remain are close to sub-economic and are required to be mined at high tonnages in order to show a return. The majority of remaining deposits are presented in challenging geological or geotechnical settings making the deposit sub-economic. The integration of ore pre-concentration and waste disposal functions into the hard rock metal mining system is proposed as a novel interpretation of Mine-Mill Integration for improving the economics and environmental impact of exploiting such deposits. The proposed approach seeks to reject waste as early as possible in the mining cycle, and safely dispose of it as backfill. This is proposed as a ‘Lean’ alternative to improving the economics of mining simply by increasing the throughput. ‘Lean’ philosophy seeks to design out overburden, smooth production, and eliminate waste from the manufacturing system. It is suggested that the proposed approach addresses all three areas, and is thus an important strategy to be considered for mining companies wishing to simultaneously improve their efficiency, economics and environmental performance, thus increasing their sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts and Figures of the Canadian Mining Industry TITLE the MINING ASSOCIATION of CANADA
    Facts and Figures of the Canadian Mining Industry TITLE THE MINING ASSOCIATION OF CANADA The Mining Association of Canada (MAC) is the national organization of the Canadian mining industry. We represent companies involved in mineral exploration, mining, smelting, refining and semi-fabrication. Our member companies account for most of Canada’s output of metals and minerals. MAC’s functions include advocacy, stewardship and collaboration. Our goals are to promote the industry’s interests nationally and internationally, to work with governments on policies affecting minerals, to inform the public and to encourage member firms to cooperate to solve common problems. We work closely with provincial and territorial mining associations, other industries, and environmental and community groups in Canada and around the world. DATA AND SOURCES This annual report reflects currently available data, the majority from 2017, though some from prior years and some from 2018. Dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars unless noted otherwise. Author: Brendan Marshall, Vice President, Economic and Northern Affairs Design: McKenna Design & Strategy Acknowledgments: This report could not have been prepared without the significant assistance of the dedicated staff of the Minerals and Metals Sector at Natural Resources Canada. Special thanks are also extended to Cynthia Waldmeier from MAC and Monique Laflèche. 2 FACTS & FIGURES 2018 TITLE TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES 04 LIST OF ANNEXES 05 STATE OF THE INDUSTRY AND KEY ISSUES 06 MINING: ONE INDUSTRY, MANY APPLICATIONS 09 1. MINING AND THE CANADIAN ECONOMY 10 Global Economic Trends 10 Mining’s Contribution to the Canadian Economy 12 Mining in the Provinces and Territories 12 Taxes and Other Payments to Governments 14 Indirect Contributions to Mining Industry Suppliers 14 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr{[S2 Xzj3çmez Wb €Bu N9osi3ysg6 Mr{[S2 Tusôo3izi4 X3çai #)I .BLJWJL1SFTJEFOU1JUB"BUBNJ POUIF0DDBTJPOPGPVS 30UI"OOJWFSTBSZ
    sW3¯6 @))* t eu3Dx5 ry5Jtø5 *%u4 46..&3t*446& mr{[s2 xzJ3çmEz Wb €bu N9osi3ysg6 mr{[s2 tusÔo3izi4 x3ÇAi #)i .BLJWJL1SFTJEFOU1JUB"BUBNJ POUIF0DDBTJPOPGPVS 30UI"OOJWFSTBSZ « kN[7u gnDtoEstsQx1zymJ5 « rNsiz: nN1axt Ìix9 €Nˆ6 « iEsio7m‰5 woix[8i4 …xyZñlq9l t 5IF&BSMZ%BZTPG$PNNVOJDBUJPOTJO/VOBWJL t 1SPmMF$BSWFS%BOJFM"OOBOBDL t )JHI&YQFDUBUJPOTGPSUIF4DIPPMT yBOENVDINPSF WA5pJ5 kN[s2 wkq8i4 Serving the Inuit of Nunavik Ì4fNi s9li / This Season b4vi x3ÇA5ti Ì8N xsIK5FsW3¯K5 mr{[j5 N9ost[sMsJK6 x3ÇAi #)i tusÔo3izk5 Wb €buj9l whmQIq8i4 xsMpIq8il b4Zi W9MEx¬8i4 xiÅt[sJu sç[sAtcMs3SA5. mr{[f9l x7ml kN[7us5 mr[4 fxS‰n8 wkgw8â5 xyk5 grymIs§aK5 vtt5yA8N§aQxq5 v?msJi9l xyq8il WNhctŒ8ii4 WZh5ti4, wNbs?1qft4 vtMs3ymZI3©I1qgi4. mr[4 kNogò5 tudtQ?z5 toIsAtc3ym5hi r=Zg3ixt9lA yKjx5ty?9oxlil wkw5 WAmIq8i4 kN[7u. wMsJdtgxc3g6 g1z[Q5hQ5 mrbA8Nstc3hi, §aJi4 WJ8Nic5yxgi9l yKo3tsQx1zM- wk8i4 W?9odtÌ3ymJi4 èuy Ñ x7ml fÑ4 b3Czi xqc tŒ8isymJu5. mr[4 w2WQIcExc3S6 vJytbs5yxm¯b Wix3ioEi4f5 wkoEi4f5 s3ymJi4, mr{[4 yKioxEymIui4 gÇZc3XS6 WZhx3bc3iu4 ck3l WsygcoEi4fl W?9od t ÌE ymIq5 xqctŒ8if5. xsM5yi3jl trst[c3ixi3ui4 €3ehwym?5hi. eg3qsChx3iu9l ®NsIi4 st3[sAt5nIi4 wkw5 wMsA8Nyd9lQ5 b3Cu ®NsItA5 mrbZhx3ik5. Ôi !@at9lA, v?mgc4f5 xzJ3çmEz5 w˜is1q©3[cMsJK6 kNogc5nIoμi4, wMst9lQ5 xu§1q©Zlx5 wkgw8â5, WJm7m¯3u4 .BLJWJL$PSQPSBUJPO gryix3bsMs3ymZt4 xi3CE1qbuk5 wo8ixEx3tbscbsymJ5 xysptb- Makivik is the ethnic organization mandated to represent and promote the interests of Nunavik. Its membership is composed of the Inuit beneficiaries of the s5ht4 wkgw8NtA5 wMŒ8iEQxoui4 wl3dygc3ui9l. Nf3üXK5 v?m4f5 James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (JBNQA). Makivik’s responsibility is to w˜is1q©3[c3iu4 Wix3icMsJQxq5 Ö4fxl wo8ixEx3tbsc5bM- ensure the proper implementation of the political, social, and cultural benefits of the Agreement, and to manage and invest the monetary compensation so as to s3ymJ5 §hQ7mE2XK5 bm4fiz sdà5gxl8i4 x©tc5bym7mb.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Mining in Canada's North
    Report January 2013 The Future of Mining in Canada’s North ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE AND TRENDS The Future of Mining in Canada’s North by Gilles Rhéaume and Margaret Caron-Vuotari About The Conference Preface Board of Canada Mining and its supporting industries will continue to be important economic drivers in many of Canada’s We are: Northern regions over the course of the next decade. The foremost independent, not-for-profit, applied While great potential for mining development exists, research organization in Canada. this potential must be approached in a balanced way. Objective and non-partisan. We do not lobby This report discusses a number of important factors— for specific interests. and their interrelationship with one another—that must Funded exclusively through the fees we charge be considered to ensure that both the positive and nega- for services to the private and public sectors. tive impacts of mining projects are fully understood. Experts in running conferences but also at con- The findings from this report provide policy-makers, ducting, publishing, and disseminating research; industry leaders, and communities with insight on steps helping people network; developing individual that can be taken to support the future of sustainable leadership skills; and building organizational mining in Canada’s North. capacity. Specialists in economic trends, as well as organizational performance and public policy issues. Not a government department or agency, although we are often hired to provide services for all levels of government. Independent from, but affiliated with, The Conference Board, Inc. of New York, which serves nearly 2,000 companies in 60 nations and has offices in Brussels and Hong Kong.
    [Show full text]
  • Pour Un Nunanik Qui a Bonne Mine
    THE FUTURE OF MINING IN NUNAVIK: PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUES RELATED TO URANIUM MINING IN A NORTHERN ENVIRONMENT BRIEF SUBMITTED BY THE NUNAVIK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH TO THE BUREAU D’AUDIENCES PUBLIQUES SUR L’ENVIRONNEMENT (ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC HEARINGS OFFICE) AND TO THE KATIVIK ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (KEAC) DECEMBER 8, 2014 REVISED: FEBRUARY 4, 2015 The Future of Mining in Nunavik: Public Health Issues related to Uranium Mining in a Northern Environment Brief submitted to the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement (Environment Public Hearings Office, BAPE) on the issues of uranium mining in Québec and to the Kativik Environmental Advisory Committee (KEAC) By the Nunavik Department of Public Health, Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services December 8, 2014 (revised: January 19, 2015) Quebec City Author: Sylvie Ricard, M.Sc. Environmental Health Officer, Department of Public Health, Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services (NRBHSS) Coordinator: Serge Déry M.D., M.Sc., MPH, FRCPC Director, Department of Public Health, NRBHSS In collaboration with: Luc Bhérer M.D. Medical Specialist for Labour and Mining Operations in Nunavik, Department of Public Health, NRBHSS Amélie Bouchard-Dufour, Dt.P., M.Sc. Nutritionist, Department of Public Health, NRBHSS Mario Brisson M.D., M.Sc. Medical Advisor for Infectious Diseases and Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, NRBHSS Léa Laflamme, Dt.P., M.Sc. Nutritionist, Department of Public Health, NRBHSS Fabien Pernet, Ph.D. Regional Coordinator to Counter Elder Abuse, Department of Inuit Practices and Values, NRBHSS Graphics: Gabrielle Fournier, Administrative Officer, NRBHSS Cover photos: Sylvie Ricard Brief submitted to the BAPE and the KEAC Page ii SUMMARY OF CONCERNS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following is an extract from the main document detailing the concerns and recommendations of the Nunavik Department of Public Health (DPH).
    [Show full text]
  • KATINNIAPIK Raglan Mine Employee Newsletter
    KATINNIAPIK Raglan Mine Employee Newsletter. Katinniapik is published in French and in English. JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2021 Vol. 15 • No 1 CONGRATULATIONS to the 2020 scholarship recipients! Left to right: Frédérique Simard-Dunn, daughter of Gilbert Dunn, By Mélanie Parr, Senior Advisor – Underground Mining Captain. Frédérique is studying Talent Attraction and Retention how to teach French as a second language at the Université du Québec à Montréal. or a 7th consecutive year, our Raglan Pierre-Olivier Leroux, son of Jean-François Leroux, Mine Scholarship Program for Director, Concentrator Operations and Energy Production F children of employees was a great Services. Pierre-Olivier is studying geology at Laval success! The program was created to University. support Raglan Mine employees and to Vanessa Bisson-Gervais, daughter of Patrick Gervais, encourage our youth to be engaged and Contract Administrator. Vanessa is currently studying excel in their studies. For the 2020 edition, medicine at McGill University. the selection committee is very pleased Rachel Bélanger, daughter of Joël Bélanger, to have selected four recipients, each of 8H Mine Project Captain. Rachel is studying medicine whom will receive a $3,000 scholarship. at Laurentian University. e are going to face some major challenges in 2021. But I’m not worried – we did a remarkable job overcoming the challenges of the past few months W (site demobilization and care and maintenance, reorganization of the work of many employees, underground rehabilitation, health measures, absence of Nunavimmiut employees…and the list goes on)! We worked together as a team to cope with the repercussions of the pandemic. We will have to keep adapting, but now we know we can overcome any challenge that comes our way.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study Report (The “Study”) Prepared for Canadian Royalties Inc
    Mining and Metallurgy Raglan South Nickel Project Technical Report Our Reference No. 017387 July 2007 Table of Contents Summary (Item 3).................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction and Terms of Reference (Item 4)................................................................... 8 Reliance on Other Experts (Item 5)................................................................................... 13 Property Description and Location (Item 6)..................................................................... 14 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure, Physiography (Item 7) ........ 14 History (Item 8).................................................................................................................... 14 Geological Setting (Item 9) ................................................................................................ 14 Deposit Types (Item 10) ..................................................................................................... 14 Mineralization (Item 11)...................................................................................................... 14 Exploration (Item 12) .......................................................................................................... 14 Drilling (Item 13).................................................................................................................. 17 Sampling Method and Approach (Item 14)......................................................................
    [Show full text]