West Raglan Technical Report Northern Québec, Canada
Respectfully submitted to: True North Nickel Inc. and Royal Nickel Corporation
Effective Date: June 30th 2014
Prepared By: Guy Desharnais Ph.D., P.Geo Dennis Arne Ph.D., P.Geo Craig Bow Ph.D., P.Geo
West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page iii
I, Craig S. Bow, of 9011 Cascade Ave, Beulah, Colorado, do hereby certify that:
I am an Independent Consulting Geologist, at the above address. This certificate regards the technical report entitled West Raglan Technical Report, Northern Québec, Canada, with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Technical Report”). I graduated from the Washington and Lee University in 1971 with a B.S. degree in Geology, and from the University of Oregon in 1979 with a Ph.D. in Geology. I am a Certified Professional Geologist # 08250 of the American Institute of Professional Geologists. I am a Fellow of the Society of Economic Geologists. th I conducted exploration and geologic mapping on the West Raglan Project between August 9 and 27th, 2013. I have practiced my profession continuously since 1979, and have wide-ranging experience in greenfields exploration, prospect evaluation, advanced project development, and exploration management. In the latter capacity I served as Exploration Manager, South America for Newcrest Mining, and as Exploration Manager, North America for Gold Fields. I am the author of several publications on subjects relating to the metals exploration industry. I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43- 101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101. I am the author of sections 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 18, and 20, and the relevant parts of section 26, of the Technical Report. I am not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the subject matter of the Technical Report that is not reflected in the Technical Report, the omission to disclose which makes the Technical Report misleading. I am independent of True North Nickel Inc and Royal Nickel Corporation and any of their subsidiary companies applying all of the tests in section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101. I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with that Instrument and Form. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the parts of the Technical Report that I am responsible for contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the report not misleading.
Dated this 28th day of July, 2014
“Craig S. Bow”
CPG
SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report - Northern Quebec, Canada Page iv
I, Dennis Arne, of Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that:
a) I currently work as a geoscientist for CSA Global Canada Geoscience Ltd - with an office located at Suite 610, 1 155 West Render Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 2P4; b) This certificate regards the technical report entitled "West Raglan Technical Report, Northern Quebec, Canada" with an effective date of June 30th, 2014 (the "Technical Report"); c) I have a B.Sc. honours degree in geology from the University of Regina, a M.Sc. in geology from Lakehead University, a Ph.D. in earth sciences from The University of Melbourne, Australia and a graduate diploma in Hydrogeology and Groundwater Management from the University of Technology - Sydney, Australia. I have worked in mineral exploration and geochemistry for more than 10 years, including several massive sulphide Ni-Cu-PGE exploration programs. I am a registered member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia (#34686), the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (#2344) and a Professional Geoscientist with the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. I am a "Qualified Person" for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 (the "Instrument"); d) I visited the West Raglan property between July 26th to August 5th, 2012; e) I am responsible for sections 1 1 and 12 of the Technical Report; f) I am independent of True North Nickel Inc. and Royal Nickel Corporation as described in section 1 .5 of the Instrument; g) I have had no prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report; h) I have read the Instrument and the sections of the Technical Report that I am responsible for, which have been prepared in compliance with the Instrument; and i) As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the parts of the Technical Report that I am responsible for, contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.
r Signed, sealed _fF_ °r. D. C. ARNE # 34S86 "Dennis A? Ph.D., P.Geo^ft§fii5fl&6onsultant - Geochemistry CSA Global Canada Geosciences Ltd. SGS Canada Inc. SGS West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page v Table of Contents 1 Summary ...... 1 1.1 The Property ...... 1 1.2 Exploration and Drilling Activity ...... 3 1.3 Geology...... 4 1.4 Conclusions ...... 4 1.5 Recommendations ...... 4 2 Introduction ...... 6 2.1 General ...... 6 2.2 Terms of Reference ...... 6 2.3 Currency, Units, abbreviations and Definitions ...... 7 2.4 Disclaimer ...... 7 3 Reliance on Other Experts ...... 8 4 Property Description and Location ...... 8 4.1 Location ...... 8 4.2 Claim Status and Title ...... 8 4.2 Permits and Environmental Liabilities ...... 10 5 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography ...... 11 5.1 Physiography ...... 11 5.2 Accessibility ...... 11 5.3 Climate ...... 12 5.4 Surface Rights...... 12 6 History ...... 14 6.1 Early History ...... 14 6.2 Recent History...... 15 7 Geological Setting and Mineralization ...... 17 7.1 Regional Geology ...... 17 7.2 Property Geology ...... 19 7.3 Nickel Mineralization in the Frontier Zone ...... 21 7.4 Nickel Mineralization in the Cape Smith Belt ...... 24 8 Deposit Types ...... 30 8.1 Ni-Deposits General ...... 30 SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page vi 8.2 Sulphide Ni Deposits ...... 30 9 Exploration ...... 33 9.1 Diamond Drilling ...... 33 9.2 Geologic Mapping ...... 33 9.3 Geophysics ...... 34 9.4 Topography ...... 34 9.5 Prospecting ...... 35 9.6 Structural Studies ...... 36 9.7 Exploration Summary ...... 36 10 Drilling ...... 40 10.1 Introduction ...... 40 10.2 Drilling Methods ...... 41 10.3 Core Logging Procedures ...... 41 10.4 Core Storage ...... 43 10.5 Results ...... 43 11 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security ...... 47 11.1 Sample Security, Preparation and Analysis ...... 47 11.1.1 AAEC 2003-2011 ...... 47 11.1.2 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ...... 48 11.1.2.1 Data Accuracy ...... 49 11.1.2.2 Data Precision ...... 53 11.1.2.3 Summary Statement ...... 54 11.2 TNN 2012 ...... 54 11.2.1 Sample Security, Preparation and Analysis ...... 54 11.2.1.1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ...... 55 11.2.1.2 Data Accuracy ...... 55 11.2.2 Data Precision ...... 58 11.2.3 Summary Statement ...... 58 12 Data Verification ...... 59 12.1 AAEC 2003 to 2011 ...... 59 12.2 TNN 2012 ...... 60 13 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing ...... 61 SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page vii 14 Mineral Resource Estimates ...... 61 15 Mineral Reserve Estimate ...... 61 16 Mining Methods ...... 61 17 Recovery Methods ...... 61 18 Project Infrastructure ...... 61 19 Market studies and Contracts ...... 62 20 Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact ...... 62 20.1 Environment and Permitting ...... 62 20.2 Social and Community Impact ...... 62 21 Capital and Operating Costs...... 63 22 Economic Analysis ...... 63 23 Adjacent Properties ...... 63 23.1 Glencore’s Raglan Mine ...... 64 23.2 Jilin Jien Nickel’s Nuvilik Mine ...... 65 24 Other Relevant Data and Information ...... 65 25 Interpretation and Conclusions ...... 66 26 Recommendations ...... 67 26.1 Drilling Recommendations ...... 67 26.2 Other Recommendations ...... 67 26.3 Recommended Program ...... 68 27 References ...... 70 Appendix 1 Nickel geochemistry: West Raglan ...... 72 Rock chip nickel results (provided by TNN) ...... 72 Till sample results (provided by TNN) ...... 73 Appendix 2 Geophysical data for the West Raglan Project Area ...... 74 Total field Spectrem magnetics data (AAEC 2003) ...... 74 Colored Tau Z-component Spectrem Electromagnetic conductors (AAEC 2003) ...... 75 Merged detailed ground magnetics data from AAEC and TNN programs (provided by TNN) . 76 Appendix 3 Geological Cross Section Interpretations ...... 77 Appendix 4 List of Claims ...... 88 SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page viii List of Tables Table 2-1. List of Abbreviations...... 7 Table 6-1. Early Exploration History: West Raglan Project Area...... 14 Table 6-2 Recent exploration history of the West Raglan Property...... 16 Table 10-1 Significant drill intersections from West Raglan Project...... 45 Table 11-1 Summary of historical Acme QAQC data from 2003...... 49 Table 11-2 Summary of historical quality control data from ALS between 2004 and 2010 with failures (in brackets) listed by standard and element...... 51 Table 11-3 Summary of QC data from ACME in 2012 with failures (in brackets) listed by standard and element. n/a = not applicable...... 56 Table 23-1. Reserve and Resources for Glencore’s Raglan Mine. Taken from 2013 Annual Report...... 64 Table 23-2. Compilation of Reserves and Resources belonging to Jilin Jien. Data was obtained from technical reports dated 2008 to 2010 from Sedar.com (see references)...... 65 Table 26-1. Drill hole proposal for follow up on existing drill hole intersections. Does not include new targets...... 69 SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page ix List of Figures Figure 1-1 Map of northern Quebec highlighting the position of the True North Nickel property. (Nickel Occurrences © Gouvernement du Québec) Image provided by TNN...... 2 Figure 1-2West Raglan and major nickel producing districts in North America. Image provided by TNN...... 3 Figure 4-1 General location map: West Raglan Property (Perk et al., 2013)...... 9 Figure 5-1. West Raglan claim boundary (yellow) and Category II zone boundary (green)(NLHCA, 2014) . (Image provided by TNN) ...... 13 Figure 7-1. Geological map of eastern Canada showing the disposition of the Circum Superior Belt (modified from Baragar and Scoates 1987)...... 17 Figure 7-2: Ni-Cu-PGM Deposits and significant Occurrences: Cape Smith Belt. (Nickel Occurrences © Gouvernement du Québec) ...... 19 Figure 7-3. West Raglan Property Geology...... 20 Figure 7-4 Typical Stratigraphic Section: West Raglan Property.(Image provided by TNN) ...... 21 Figure 7-5 Oblique view of the mineralization identified in WR-08-164 hosted in ultramafic rocks (purple) occurring near the “hanging-wall” contact with basalt (green). Spheres represent mineralized intervals; see Table 10-1 for analytical results...... 22 Figure 7-6 Oblique view of the Frontier East mineralization mainly hosted within argillite (grey drill trace). Mineralized intervals as spheres whose results can be found in Table 10-1...... 23 Figure 7-7 Long section of mineralized intervals displayed as spheres and based on Pd grades showing apparent westerly plunging trends within the Frontier area...... 23 Figure 7-8 Typical cross section for the Raglan Mine. Black lines show typical drilling pattern to hit the base of a continuous sheet of ultramafic rocks (Katinniq zone) (Lesher 2007)...... 25 Figure 7-9. Surface map of the Katinniq area showing the cluster of lenses within a “trend” (Lesher 2007)...... 26 Figure 7-10. Schematic cross section through the 1040 Lens from the Kikialik zone of the Raglan mine (Glencore). Figure altered from Osmond et al. 2002...... 27 Figure 7-11. Geological map and two type cross sections through the Mequillon deposit belonging to Nunavik Nickel Mines (Armstrong et al., 2007)...... 27 Figure 7-12. Keel or Canoe model modified from block diagram for the “Expo Intrusive Suite” South Trend. Image altered from Mungall (2007)...... 28 Figure 7-13. Geological map of the South Raglan Trend or “Expo Intrusive Suite”. Note the labeled points corresponding to the exposure of the base of canoe-shaped intrusions at surface (and ore bodies). Image taken from Mungall (2007)...... 28 Figure 8-1.Geology map and cross sections of the Jinchuan deposits (Lightfoot 2007)...... 31 SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page x Figure 9-1Long section showing mineralized bodies in red, and modeled conductive plates as blue squares. Topography and drill hole traces are also shown...... 34 Figure 9-2. Gossanous subcrop of lens 14 at Frontier Central displaying surface expression of mineralization within the West Raglan Property...... 35 Figure 9-3. Merged, EM and detailed topographic and imagery data, Frontier Zone (Perk et al., 2013) ...... 37 Figure 9-4. Merged, detailed geologic mapping and ground magnetics data, Frontier Zone (Perk et al., 2013)...... 38 Figure 10-1 Drill hole locations throughout the West Raglan area...... 40 Figure 10-2. This core mosaic shows from right to left magmatic foliation (Smg) and sulphide blebs alignment (Ldbs) (conformable to foliation), progressively into a conformable magmatic and sulphide foliation (Ss). Note that massive sulphide veins and veinlets are nucleating and cutting both. Photo from Wells and Smerchanski 2013 (Vektore study)...... 42 Figure 10-3. Section 443925E, Seahawk A Lens. Interpretation merges historic drilling results with 2013 geologic mapping...... 44 Figure 10-4. Key map for the significant mineralized drill intersections included in Table 10-1. . 46 Figure 11-1. Summary of Ni fusion data for Oreas 13p from ALS Minerals between 2003 and 2011...... 52 Figure 11-2 Summary of Cu fusion for Oreas 13p from ALS Minerals between 2003 and 2011.53 Figure 11-3 Slight negative bias in Ni data evident in ACME internal CRM CDN-ME-9...... 57 Figure 11-4 Negative bias in Cu data evident in ACME internal CRM CDN-ME-9...... 57 Figure 11-5 Analytical data for Pd from ACME internal CRM CDN-PGMS-19...... 58 Figure 23-1 Adjacent properties to West Raglan (Figure Provided by TNN) ...... 64 SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 1 1 Summary SGS Canada Inc. (“SGS Geostat”) was commissioned by True North Nickel (“TNN”) on May 12th 2014 to prepare a NI 43-101 compliant Technical Report. The Technical Report was completed by SGS Geostat with assistance from Dennis Arne of CSA Global and Craig Bow, Consulting Geologist, of Beulah, Colorado, USA based on data available as of June 30th 2014. 1.1 The Property The West Raglan property was first staked in 2002 by Anglo American Exploration Canada Ltd (“AAEC”) when preliminary geological reconnaissance in the area confirmed the presence of a significant strike length of both the "Raglan Trend" and the "South (Expo) Trend". The property was acquired by TNN from Anglo American plc in 2012 and contains the nickel sulphide-bearing ultramafic rock package which hosts the world class Raglan Ni-Cu-PGM mine operated by Glencore plc (Figure 1-1). The West Raglan property is located approximately 90 kilometers south of the village of Salluit in Nunavik, Quebec and consists of 965 mining claims totaling 39,912Hectares. A total of 229 drill holes have been completed on the property for a length of 43,541m. Highlights from the previous exploration campaigns include 28.28m grading 3.21% Ni, 1.32% Cu, 2.43g/t Pd, 0.65g/t Pt and 10.50m grading 2.78% Ni, 1.21% Cu, 2.78g/t Pd and 0.80g/t Pt; both drill holes occur within the Frontier target area. These intersections are very similar to the typical ore from the Raglan mine, which is amongst the richest Ni-Cu-PGM mines in the world. The West Raglan property is currently held 100% by True North Nickel. On June 18, 2014, Royal Nickel Corporation (“RNC”) announced that it had closed a transaction to acquire an approximate 56% interest in True North Nickel Inc. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 2 Figure 1-1 Map of northern Quebec highlighting the position of the True North Nickel, West Raglanproperty. (Nickel Occurrences © Gouvernement du Québec) Image provided by TNN. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 3 Figure 1-2West Raglan and major nickel producing districts in North America. Image provided by TNN. 1.2 Exploration and Drilling Activity Between 2002 and 2013 there were multiple campaigns of geologic mapping, prospecting, sampling, geophysical surveys and diamond drilling which resulted in significant Ni-Cu-PGE discoveries on the West Raglan Project. The most recent exploration campaign was completed by TNN during the period 2012-2013; the focus of exploration was to advance the Frontier Area, where high grade Ni-Cu-PGM mineralization had been intersected over potentially minable widths. Details of this exploration activity are presented in later sections of this report. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 4 1.3 Geology The West Raglan property lies in the west central portion of the Cape Smith Belt, a linear belt of mafic and ultramafic magmatic rocks of Proterozoic age. Ni‐Cu‐PGM sulphide deposits in the Cape Smith Belt are associated with ultramafic intrusions and possibly flows occurring stratigraphically below the Chukotat Group basalt. 1.4 Conclusions The Frontier Zone within the West Raglan property represents the best known geological analog to the Ni-rich Raglan deposits outside of Glencore’s mining lease. Existing work is significant in breadth and scope, and some of drill results are remarkable. To date, however, no resource estimates have been undertaken, because most of the significant intersections do not have sufficient geological support to understand the orientations and extents of the mineralized bodies. The authors believe that the “Exploration Target Potential” exists to identify a deposit of 5Mt to 20Mt grading between 1% and 3% Ni for this property. This statement is supported by the geologically favorable factors for the property: 1. Geological disposition within a world class Ni mining camp; 2. Presence of large volumes of ultramafic rocks which are characterized by abundant examples of sulphide saturation, accompanied by anomalous Ni and Pd values over broad areas; 3. Dozens of untested conductivity targets from airborne (0-100m depth) and surface surveys (0-300m); 4. An expanded genetic model which has increased the number of high priority targets. The “Exploration Target Potential” described above refers to a conceptual quantity and grade of mineralized material that is based on geological information and interpretation, but lacks sufficient data density to be declared a ‘Mineral Resource’, under CIM and NI 43-101 guidelines. This estimate is conceptual in nature, information is insufficient to declare resources, and it is uncertain whether further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource. 1.5 Recommendations Successful exploration for the deposits within the West Raglan Property requires a persistent and systematic approach. This is due to the highly variable size and geometry of mineralized lenses that are known to occur within other parts of the Cape Smith Belt. Further drilling of certain existing mineralized lenses is strongly recommended and is considered likely to extend these zones. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 5 A cursory review of the property has revealed that several shallow conductors have been overlooked because they occur laterally adjacent to high magnetic signatures, or appear to be flat lying. These targets should be tested to evaluate the “keel-hosted” mineralization model. Existing geophysical products are appropriate for identification of this type of mineralization, and should be re-evaluated in light of this new model. Further exploration is also recommended in the southern portion of the property over the South Trend stratigraphy. Most of the prospective intrusions have a very limited exposure; it is therefore recommended to undertake additional geophysical surveys such as detailed airborne gravity to help delineate potentially mineralized domains. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 6 2 Introduction 2.1 General This technical report was prepared by SGS Geostat with support from Dennis Arne and Craig Bow, for True North Nickel to facilitate public release of information for the West Raglan Project. The report describes the geophysical, exploration, and drill findings on this property. The report also presents a full review of the history, geology, sample preparation and analysis, and data verification of the project. In preparing this technical report, the authors relied on various reports, maps, and miscellaneous technical papers listed in references. This report is based on information made available to the authors as of June 30, 2014. Guy Desharnais has never visited the West Raglan Property. Craig Bow visited the property August 9th to 27th of 2013 for a review of exploration methodology, sampling procedures and core storage. Dennis Arne was present July 26th to August 5th during the 2012 drill campaign. 2.2 Terms of Reference This technical report has been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 standards. Guy Desharnais Ph.D., P.Geo was responsible for sections 1-3, 7, 8, 23-27 of this report. Craig Bow P.Geo was responsible for the site visit and sections 4-6, 9, 10, 18 and 20 of this report. Dennis Arne Ph.D., P.Geo was responsible for sections 11 and 12 of this report. Additional information contained in this report has been sourced from historic documents as listed in section 27, and as provided by True North Nickel. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 7 2.3 Currency, Units, abbreviations and Definitions All measurements in this report are presented in “International System of Units” (SI) metric units, and are listed in Table 2-1. All currency amounts are in Canadian Dollars ($) unless otherwise stated. Table 2-1. List of Abbreviations. Name Abbreviation µ Micron mm Millimeter m Meter $ Canadian dollar g Gram g/t Gram per tonne ha Hectare km Kilometer ppm Part per million ppb Part per billion t Tonne Mt Million Tonnes % Percent °C Degrees Celsius 2.4 Disclaimer It should be understood that no mineral resources have been presented in this Technical Report. The comments in this Technical Report reflect the authors’ and SGS Geostat best judgment in light of the information available. A complete list of the reports available to the authors is found in the References section of this report. Drilling data was obtained from True North Nickel and validated against information obtained during the field visit and directly from the analytical laboratory. Independent sampling of the mineralization was not possible due to logistical constraints; however all geological and geochemical information witnessed and verified is coherent and sufficiently robust for the purpose of this report. Claim status was obtained from the Gestim (Québec Government) website however; several claim renewals were pending or forthcoming, during the verification (June 30th, 2014). TNN has ensured the authors that the renewal applications and required payments have been completed and submitted for all claims of significance; the authors have not independently verified this. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 8 3 Reliance on Other Experts The report was completed by the authors whose certificates can be found at the front of this report, however much of the work was summarized from previous reports completed by former employees or contractors to TNN or AAEC, in particular Phil Smerchanski and Neil Perk. For a full list of references and contributing reports, please see the reference section. 4 Property Description and Location 4.1 Location The West Raglan Project is located in Nunavik Territory, Quebec, approximately 90 kilometers south of the Village of Salluit, a regional community on the Arctic coast (Figure 4-1). 4.2 Claim Status and Title The Property comprises 965 map designated claims covering an area of 39,912 hectares, oriented approximately EW and centered at 61°22’ North latitude and 75°55’ West longitude. All claims are 100% owned by True North Nickel Inc. based in Vancouver, British Columbia and are in good standing as of the effective date of this report. Appendix 4 contains a complete listing of the claims and their expiry dates. It should be noted that many claims are up for renewal in the next 3 months and it is unknown if TNN will elect to renew all the claims within the current Property. A Net Smelter Royalty of 1.5% is payable to a third party for mineral production from the Property. True North Nickel has the right to repurchase one-third (but no more or no less) of the Royalty (or 0.5% of Net Smelter Returns) with respect to the Property for a price of $2,000,000CAD, reducing the Royalty from 1.5% to 1% of the Net Smelter Returns from the Property. There are no other royalties, back-in rights, payments, or other agreements and encumbrances. On June 18, 2014, Royal Nickel Corporation (“RNC”) announced that it had closed a transaction to acquire an approximate 56% interest in True North Nickel Inc. . SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 9 Figure 4-1 General location map: West Raglan Property (Perk et al., 2013). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 10 4.2 Permits and Environmental Liabilities Operators of the Project are required by law to obtain an annual authorization from the Québec Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks (MDDEP) to re-open the camp at Lac Chukotat. The camp authorization permits a maximum capacity of 60 people. A separate authorization from the Kativik Regional Government is required to re-open the camp and carry out exploration activities at West Raglan. The Kativik Regional Government is the official custodian by virtue of section 304 of the Act Respecting Northern Villages. Environmental and water quality studies have been carried out on a regular basis and are further described in Section 20 of this report. There are no known significant environmental liabilities associated with the property. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 11 5 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography 5.1 Physiography The Property is located approximately 400km north of tree line, between latitudes 61º 10’ and 61º 50’. Topography ranges from east-west trending, rocky ridges and valleys at approximately 250 meters above sea level in the northern portion of the property to relatively flat, grass- covered tundra in the south. Exposed rock has been affected by frost action, reducing many outcrops to rubble and angular blocks. Lowland areas are typically covered by till and swampy tundra, with scattered boulder fields. The region is characterized by variable permafrost up to depths of 540 metres. Vegetation consists mostly of grasses, lichen, and moss. Wildlife includes caribou, fox, snowy owl, peregrine falcon, Canada geese, arctic hare, lemming, and vole; polar bears have been sighted on the property on two reported occasions. Rivers and lakes contain arctic char and lake trout (Wells and Smerchanski, 2013). The nearest population center to West Raglan property is the Villiage of Salluit, approximately 90km to the north. 5.2 Accessibility The West Raglan Project is accessible by fixed wing aircraft and by helicopter. A 256 metre airstrip was constructed 8km south of the camp in 2008, and is utilized by Air Inuit’s Twin Otter aircraft. In 2012, significant maintenance work was completed to fill in and smooth the airstrip under agreement with Air Inuit (Wells and Smerchanski, 2013). The airstrip was inspected during the 2013 program, and found to be in excellent condition. Although there are no roads in the area, an ice road/trail was previously established between camp and Salluit for movement of fuel and equipment during winter months. This transportation option was last used in 2006 and subsequently was determined to be of limited benefit due to the safety risks and high costs associated with winter operations (Wells and Smerchanski, 2013). The 2013 exploration team accessed the project by helicopter from Purvirnituq (serviced by Air Inuit scheduled flights from Montreal). All equipment and consumables were sent to Purvirnituq via Air Inuit Cargo. Although this is a viable access and supply scheme for a small work program, it would likely not make financial sense to use the same route on a larger program with additional cargo needs and frequent crew-changes. In previous years, crews flew commercially through Iqaluit and then by Twin Otter to camp. Access to the site has been improved with the recent repairs to the airstrip being completed providing more flexibility for camp logistics. A significant amount of both diesel fuel for drilling and jet fuel for helicopters is currently on site and stored in Salluit which should facilitate start-up of the next exploration campaign in 2015. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 12 5.3 Climate Average annual temperature in the region is -10°C. Approximately 650 mm of precipitation falls annually (75% as snow). Lake and river ice breaks-up in early July and freezes in late September to early October. Summers are often warm with clear skies, but by late August weather becomes increasingly unpredictable with fog, freezing rain, snow squalls and high gusty winds. Winter field work, including diamond drilling and geophysics, is not recommended from this camp as it is not properly equipped for extreme cold weather, high winds and heavy snow loads. Insufficient daylight and lack of background contrast also hamper movements to and from the camp and work sites (Wells and Smerchanski, 2013). 5.4 Surface Rights The Property consists of 965 claims covering 39,912Ha. The eastern portion of the Property is classed as Category II lands (Figure 5-1). Nunavik landholding corporations are not owners of Category II lands; rather, these are buffer zones where Native people have the exclusive right to hunt, fish, trap and establish or operate outfitting facilities. Surface, mineral and subsurface rights over Category II lands are in the hands of the Québec government who may approve development projects with respect of some preliminary conditions: • Consultation with the concerned landholding corporation(s) • Compensation to concerned landholding corporation(s) or • Replacement of Category II land. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 13 Figure 5-1. West Raglan claim boundary (yellow) and Category II zone boundary (green)(NLHCA, 2014) . (Image provided by TNN) SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 14 6 History 6.1 Early History Exploration and prospecting of the general project area dates back to the early 1930's, with the discovery of rocks considered favorable for base metal mineralization. Despite periodic exploration campaigns, little systematic work was attempted for many decades, due to remoteness and lack of access. Modern exploration interest in the belt was kindled in the early 1990’s, following the decision by Falconbridge Ltd. to put the Katinniq Ni-Cu-PGM deposit into production. Exploration success in the southern part of the belt by Canadian Royalties in the late 1990’s prompted a major staking rush across the belt. Early exploration and academic studies in the general area are summarized as Table 6-1. Table 6-1. Early Exploration History: West Raglan Project Area. Year Company/Individual Description of Work 1902 Low * geological reconnaissance of coastal areas 1931-32 Various * Cape Smith Belt prospected for base metals; several mineral showings discovered near the coast in the western part of the belt 1957 Various * multiple exploration programs, Quebec government mapping of the western and central portion of the belt 1970 Amax * Aerodat Fixed-wing Airborne Radiometric and VLF surveys over parts of project area 1985-87 Moorhead *1:50,000 scale mapping in the area around Lac Chukotat 1987 Ateba Mines * 3-frequency Aerodat helicopter based survey Jascan * Ground VLF-EM-Magnetic survey follow-up and geological exploration work of eastern portion of property 1994 Budkewitsch * Lac Renard area, 1:10,000 scale geological mapping and structural study (Master's thesis) 1995 Falconbridge * 1:20,000 scale geological mapping and prospecting on the eastern half of the property * Further work recommended along base of the Chukotat Group volcanic 1996 Falconbridge * DIGHEM airborne EM/Magnetics/VLF survey covered 294 line km at northeast limits of the Property 1997 Diagneault * glacial history/ ice movements of Northern Nunavik 2001 Noranda * Hyperspectral survey and geological follow-up over 2250 square km SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 15 6.2 Recent History In 2002, AAEC staked what is now the West Raglan Project, and rapidly discovered a number of high grade Ni-Cu-PGM lenses in the Frontier Area. In 2003, Knight Resources Ltd (“Knight”) was granted an option to acquire a 49% interest in the Project, ultimately leading to the formation of a Joint Venture partnership which explored the area systematically over the period 2003-2010. Technical programs included multiple phases of geologic mapping, prospecting, ground and airborne geophysical surveys. A total of 197 diamond drill holes were completed, for a total of 37,858 meters. Aggregate spend for the project was reported to be $43,500,000. Table 6-2 summarizes AAEC exploration work across the West Raglan Property. Under terms of a purchase agreement with AAEC, TNN acquired 100% ownership of the West Raglan Property on August 1, 2012. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 16 Table 6-2 Recent exploration history of the West Raglan Property. Year Company Description of Work 2002 Anglo * AAEC staked the West Raglan project American * Reconnaissance mapping confirmed the presence of "Raglan Trend" and "South (Expo) Trend" 2003 Anglo *SPECTREM fixed–wing airborne electromagnetic and magnetic survey at 200m flight line American spacing for 4575 line kilometres, identified 51 priority targets *ground geological follow-up of targets * Summer ground geophysical surveying (magnetics, HLEM, surface TEM, and borehole EM) * 18 drill holes / 2306m * discovery of high grade Ni-Cu-PGM rich zones at Frontier East, South, and Central 2004 Anglo * AeroTEM helicopter electromagnetic and magnetic survey: 3313.3 line km over selected American target areas * Geological mapping and prospecting * Soil and stream sediment/moss mat sampling * Ground geophysical surveying - magnetics, moving loop TDEM and HLEM (GM 62168) * 60 drill holes / 7241m * New Ni-Cu-PGM mineralized zones discovered 2005 Anglo * winter ground geophysical surveying (TEM and magnetics) American * Summer ground geophysical surveying (magnetics, HLEM and borehole EM) * Geological mapping and prospecting * Surface Tills and soil (3341 samples) * 29 drill holes / 4772m * 2 new mineralized zones discovered in Frontier area 2006 Anglo * ground geophysics (InfiniTEM and moving loop TDEM) American * Ground Magnetics, HLEM and BHEM completed. * Soil and till sampling over southern portion of property. * 22 drill holes / 4303m * Significant Ni-Cu-PGM intersected at Century lens in Frontier South 2007 Anglo *detailed mapping at Frontier, Target 36, Beverly, Boomerang and southern part of claim block. American * significant mineral showings discovered at Frontier South and Target 36 * 19 drill holes / 5925m * 7 holes intersected Ni >1.0% 2008 Anglo * 28 drill holes / 8313m, Frontier and Beverley areas American * Seahawk A discovery, 2.66% Ni, 1.10% Cu, 2.0g/t Pd, and 0.54g/t Pt over 36.43m * Geological mapping at Beverley, Boomerang, and CDC areas. * Ground magnetics at Boomerang and CDC areas 2009 Anglo * surface work only, no drilling American * 1203 line km ground magnetic surveying * 322 line km VTEM survey over POV targets (southern part of property) * 157 line km Ground TEM surveying * Surface prospecting over 35 different areas, limited new mineralization - a sample at MAC-44 returned 0.33% Ni * Multiple new drill targets identified 2010 Anglo * 79 line km TDEM surveying over Terrace, Green Zone, Boomerang, and several Povungnituk American targets * 108.1 line km ground magnetic surveying * mapping and prospecting over Povungnituk targets (southern part of property) * no new targets developed from this work * 4998m of drilling at Terrace, Green Zone, Rain Day, CDC, and Povungnituk; no significant Ni- Cu-PGM mineralization 2011 Anglo * Camp clean up and demobilization work American SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 17 7 Geological Setting and Mineralization 7.1 Regional Geology The West Raglan property lies in the west central portion of the Cape Smith Belt, a linear belt of magmatic rocks related to the ≈1.88 Ga Chukotat Large Igneous Province (LIP). This belt forms a part of the wider Circum-Superior LIP event which rings the Archean Superior Craton and is responsible for ultramafic magmatism hosting nickel sulphide ore bodies at Thompson, Manitoba and in the Labrador Trough, and platinum and nickel sulphide occurrences at Fox River, Manitoba (Jowitt and Ernst 2012, Desharnais 2005). Figure 7-1shows the massive scale of this magmatic event which has developed two prolific Ni-mining camps, with several indications of more discoveries to come. The age of the mineralized ultramafic rocks within the Raglan belt is likely 1883Ma, even though it has previously been believed to be older based on a sample of Gabbro that was likely related to an older set of intrusions with a similar composition (Mungall 2007). Figure 7-1. Geological map of eastern Canada showing the disposition of the Circum Superior Belt (modified from Baragar and Scoates 1987). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 18 The Povungnituk Group is a volcano-sedimentary assemblage that rests unconformably on the Archean basement of the Ungava Peninsula (Figure 7-3). The Nituk Formation forms the base of this group and is a sedimentary package comprised of siliciclastic conglomerates, and sandstones, through to siltstones, with local silicate facies iron formation. The Beauparlant Formation overlies the Nituk Formation and is dominantly comprised of thoeliitic basalt and phyllitic units with minor calc-alkaline rhyolite domes and rare volcaniclastics. The Beauparlant and Nituk Formations are, in turn, intruded by a large volume of diabase and gabbro dikes and sills. The Cecilia Formation occurs only in the central portion of the Cape Smith Belt and conformably overlies the Beauparlant Formation and is comprised of alkaline basalt, andesite, and minor rhyolite volcaniclastics, pyroclastics, and flows with a smaller proportion of siliclastic units, cherts, and dolomites. The Nuvilic Formation (marking the top of the Povungnituk Group) is a deep water marine sedimentary sequence comprised of carbonaceous mudstones and siltstones, some with a significant proportion of both disseminated and massive exhalative sulphides, dominantly pyrrhotite. The Nuvilic Formation hosts the vast majority of the Lac Esker Suite ultramafic intrusions responsible for nickel-copper mineralization both on the West Raglan Project and across the Cape Smith Belt. The overlying Chukotat Group is a volcanic sequence of olivine-phyric, pyroxene-phyric, and plagioclase-phyric komatiitic to thoeliitic basalt flows. It is intruded by, and coeval with, the Lac Esker ultramafic Suite (Lamothe et. al. 2007). The Lac Esker Suite (1.89-1.87 Ga) is comprised of a series of hypabyssal sub-volcanic ultramafic intrusions, dominantly sills, that are wherlitic in composition and grade from dunite to peridotite or olivine pyroxenite central conduits with pyroxenite to gabbro marginal zones. These intrusions host all known nickel sulphide mineralization in the Cape Smith Belt. Lac Esker intrusive suite mafic and ultramafic sills and dykes intrude the Povungnituk and Chukotat sequences along and adjacent to major northwest trending structures. Magmatic activity was localized along a major linear suture zone forming the main east-west axis of the belt: at the contact between Chukotat and Povugnituk Groups. The northwest trending faults and a set of subordinate northeast trending structures are likely related to original transform faults in the basin subsequently re-activated by basin extension. The Cape Smith Belt was subsequently deformed by east-west trending and north-northwest trending folding during the Hudsonian Orogeny. All of the host rock sequences and stratigraphic groups are interpreted to be bound by thrust faults. Nickel-copper sulphide ore is currently mined by Glencore at their Raglan Mine and by Nunavik Nickel (Jilin Jien) at their Nunavik Mine (Figure 7-2). Similar nickel mineralization has been discovered across the West Raglan property associated with Lac Esker Suite ultramafic intrusions. Seven key zones have been identified with the recent work program focused on the Frontier, with high grade mineralized drill intercepts similar to that of the Raglan Mine (Jowitt et al, 2010). Ni‐Cu‐PGE sulphide deposits in the Cape Smith Belt are associated with ultramafic intrusions and komatiitic flows emplaced throughout the Povungnituk Group and in particular at its upper contact with the Chukotat Group. The individual ultramafic intrusions hosting the sulphide deposits are generally thinner than 150 meters stratigraphic thickness and can be traced for SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 19 1,000 to 10,000 meters. The sulphide deposits of the Raglan Mine are typically comprised of clusters of multiple distinct lenses. These are subdivided by Lesher, (2007) into three main types, based on location and geometry: contact mineralization, hanging wall mineralization and narrow vein‐type mineralization. Figure 7-2: Ni-Cu-PGM Deposits and significant Occurrences: Cape Smith Belt. (Nickel Occurrences © Gouvernement du Québec) 7.2 Property Geology The geology of the West Raglan property comprises the volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the Chukotat and Povungnituk Groups, intruded by the Lac Esker Suite of ultramafic rocks (Figure 7-3). The Chukotat Group consists of a thick succession of relatively undeformed komatiitic basalt massive flows and pillowed flows with numerous minor interflow sedimentary units. The lower part of the Chukotat Group is in transitional contact with the Povungnituk Group sulphide rich (semi-massive to massive pyrite and/or pyrrhotite) mudstones, siltstones and carbonatized volcanic detrital rocks (Dionne-Foster, 2007). This transitional contact zone is intruded by a series of ultramafic intrusions that vary in composition from dunite to pyroxenite and are dominantly wherlitic. Five distinct intrusions are currently interpreted on the basis of minor lithogeochemical variation, field observation and magnetic signatures in the Frontier area. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 20 Figure 7-3. West Raglan Property Geology. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 21 The southern portion of the West Raglan property is dominated by volcano-sedimentary rocks of the Povungnituk Group. This group consists mainly of highly deformed tholeiitic basalts with interflow sediments such as mudstone (some sulphidic), iron formations and calcareous shale. Minor gabbroic and ultramafic intrusions are also present, although exposures are scarce due to extensive glacial till and soil cover. Magnetic responses indicate that numerous ultramafic bodies, magnetic gabbros, and iron formations are present beneath this cover. This geologic setting is host to the mineral resources at Jilin Jien’s Nunavik Mine and those of the adjacent Belanger Property. Figure 7-4 Typical Stratigraphic Section: West Raglan Property. Image provided by TNN. 7.3 Nickel Mineralization in the Frontier Zone The ultramafic intrusions of the Frontier Zone of West Raglan Property are located at the same stratigraphic position as all of Glencore’s Raglan Mine deposits. Most of the deposits being mined by Glencore occur at the gabbroic footwall contact of intrusions that have generally tabular shapes. The mineralization within the Frontier area on the other hand does not have a clear association with the basal footwall contact, which is primarily composed of argillite or basalt. The mineralized bodies primarily occur at internal contacts between ultramafic units; these contacts are not clearly discernible in outcrop or drilling, except for the occurrence of sulphides themselves. The Frontier East series of mineralized bodies (North and South) is SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 22 unique in that it is hosted in a brecciated zone of argillite (Figure 7-6). The lack of clear association of the mineralization on the Frontier Zone with the southern contacts of the intrusions has caused the author to question the use of the “Classic Raglan Model” as previously applied to exploration at Frontier. As discussed in the following sections , the canoe- shaped intrusive model merits testing given the available information (see section 7.4 and the geological sections in Appendix 3). Although the trend is not very clear, there appears to be a preferential lineation of mineralization in a gently plunging western direction (Figure 7-7). The nickel tenor of sulphide mineralization at the Frontier zone is similar to Glencore’s Raglan deposits and notably higher than the deposits being mined by Nunavik Mines. This implies that for the same sulphide content of the rocks, the nickel content of the mineralization is higher, which has a significant impact on the economics of any potential mine. Figure 7-5 Oblique view of the mineralization identified in WR-08-164 hosted in ultramafic rocks (purple) occurring near the “hanging-wall” contact with basalt (green). Spheres represent mineralized intervals; see Table 10-1 for analytical results. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 23 Figure 7-6 Oblique view of the Frontier East mineralization mainly hosted within argillite (grey drill trace). Mineralized intervals as spheres whose results can be found in Table 10-1. Figure 7-7 Long section of mineralized intervals displayed as spheres and based on Pd grades showing apparent westerly plunging trends within the Frontier area. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 24 7.4 Nickel Mineralization in the Cape Smith Belt Footwall contact lenses are the dominant mineralization type at Glencore’s Raglan Mine. These lenses are typically localized in embayments along footwall contacts of the individual ultramafic intrusions. Economic Ni-Cu-Co-PGM mineralization is composed of disseminated, net-textured, and massive pyrrhotite-pentlandite-chalcopyrite rich sulphides contained within more than 140 individual sulphide lenses, extending from surface to more than 750m vertical depth. The size of these high-grade sulphide lenses varies significantly from 0.01Mt to 5.2Mt, averaging 0.2Mt. Remaining life of mine is in excess of 20 years (Glencore Annual Report 2013). The sulphide lenses commonly exhibit a texturally‐layered anatomy with a thin, basal layer of massive sulphides (≈8‐12% Ni, up to 20% Ni), surmounted by variable thicknesses of net‐textured sulphides (≈2‐7% Ni), forming the bulk of the resource, and grading into disseminated sulphides (≈0.5‐3% Ni). Another sulphide association which is less common is composed of massive to semi-massive brecciated sulphides which are heterogeneously mixed with sedimentary footwall rock and ultramafic rock. The sulphides are sometimes completely removed from the ultramafic rock and appear to have been locally injected into the sedimentary rocks. The sulphides associated with sedimentary rock are typically lower tenor (Ni/S) but retain overall higher grade (4-9% Ni) due to the higher overall sulphide content of the rock. At Raglan Mine the facing direction (“up” at the time of ore body formation) is generally considered to be perpendicular to the general stratigraphy: i.e. sub vertically and to the north. The fact that all the mineralized bodies occur at the transition between Povugnituk and Chukotat Groups has in part led to the interpretation that the ultramafic rocks are volcanic in origin (i.e. they don’t cross cut stratigraphy). An intrusive origin for the ultramafic rocks is also postulated and is supported by complex contact relationships with the hangingwall rocks (with Chukotat basalts or sediments). The concordant stratigraphy and apparent topping direction implies that drilling should always be oriented to the south to intersect the footwall contact at right angles (in the direction of sulphide accumulation) (Figure 7-8). This is what we call the “Classic Raglan Model”. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 25 Figure 7-8 Typical cross section for the Raglan Mine. Black lines show typical drilling pattern to hit the base of a continuous sheet of ultramafic rocks (Katinniq zone) (Lesher 2007). The embayments that host the contact lenses may form in a variety of ways, including: paleotopographic features/channels, thermomechanical erosion conduits, and folds/faults along the footwall contacts, all of which may subsequently undergo structural modification. These processes ultimately lead to the formation of co‐planar clusters of texturally‐layered, lenticular, sulphide bodies, along key contacts within the ultramafic stratigraphy. Even the canoe shaped intrusions are subject to concentration of sulphide in embayments in the keel. The dimensions of these bodies vary on a scale of 10’s to 100’s of meters, as does the spacing between individual lenses within the clusters. The clusters tend to form broadly linear trends (Figure 7-9) that may delineate the channels, or conduits, in which they were deposited, providing some predictability to the targeting exercise, once these trends are recognized. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 26 Figure 7-9. Surface map of the Katinniq area showing the cluster of lenses within a “trend” (Lesher 2007). Occasionally, along this same stratigraphic contact at the Raglan Mine, the ultramafic intrusion is canoe shaped, and ore occurs at the base, or “keel”, of the canoe (topographically down). This geometry was recently recognized at the Kikialik zone which hosts 2.3Mt of 3% Ni and is currently in production (Figure 7-10) (Beausejour 2011, Osmond et al. 2002). For these canoe- shaped intrusions, drilling should be focused along the base of the canoe (into the “keel”); starting in shallow portions and tracing into deeper portions (Figure 7-10 and Figure 7-11). This geometry is the most common metallotect in the South Raglan Trend or Expo Intrusive Suite (Mungal 2007). The most notable deposits of this type are in production by Jilin Jien Nickel. Note the position of labeled mineralized bodies occurring at the extremities of ultramafic bodies in Figure 7-13 (i.e. where the keels “sky out”). These intrusive extremities typically show lower magnetic intensity and would not be targeted using the “Classic Raglan Model”. The deeper extents of the intrusions are difficult to target with drilling due to the thin elongated shape of the ore (Figure 7-11 and Figure 7-12). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 27 Figure 7-10. Schematic cross section through the 1040 Lens from the Kikialik zone of the Raglan mine (Glencore). Figure altered from Osmond et al. 2002. Figure 7-11. Geological map and two type cross sections through the Mequillon deposit belonging to Nunavik Nickel Mines (Armstrong et al., 2007). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 28 Figure 7-12. Keel or Canoe model modified from block diagram for the “Expo Intrusive Suite” South Trend. Image altered from Mungall (2007). Figure 7-13. Geological map of the South Raglan Trend or “Expo Intrusive Suite”. Note the labeled points corresponding to the exposure of the base of canoe-shaped intrusions at surface (and ore bodies). Image taken from Mungall (2007). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 29 The author believes that all Ni-rich ultramafic rocks located within the Cape Smith Belt are comagmatic and represent a single event occurring at 1883Ma. There appears to be at least two separate geometries of intrusions: “flat sheets” and “canoe-shaped”. The occurrence of a particular geometry of intrusion is merely a function of the rheology (ability to deform) and disposition (steepness) of host rocks during magma emplacement. The occurrence of Kikialik as a canoe shaped intrusion at the same stratigraphic level as the other productive Raglan mining centers supports the application of this geologic model and associated exploration targeting methods within the Frontier area (Figure 7-10 and Figure 7-12). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 30 8 Deposit Types The primary mineralization targeted within the West Raglan Property is magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide associated with ultramafic rocks. As described in the previous section this deposit type within the Cape Smith Belt occurs primarily at the base of tabular shaped or canoe shaped intrusions that typically occur below the Chukotat Group. A few Zn-Pb-Cu-Ag-Au volcanogenic massive sulphide style showings have also been identified in the Cape Smith Belt; however these are not considered significant, and none have been identified on the West Raglan Property. 8.1 Ni-Deposits General Most of the world’s nickel produced is currently sourced from sulphide deposits. Head grades for these types of deposits are typically in the 1-5% range and are often associated with Cu, Co, Pd, Pt and Au. These elements are typically concentrated along with the sulphide during flotation in the processing plants but rarely make up more than 5% of the value of the ore. Notable exceptions to this include Sudbury (Footwall mineralization), Norilsk, and Raglan for which the Cu and Platinum Group Metals (PGM) provide a significant bump in revenue. The other major source of nickel comes from laterite deposits which are typically lower grade (1- 2.5%) and very high tonnage. They represent highly altered ultramafic rocks, typically occurring in countries with tropical climates. These deposits have a narrower profit margin due to the high energy necessary to produce ferro-nickel and/or low recovery from leaching processes. 8.2 Sulphide Ni Deposits Parts of this section were copied from a compilation by Lightfoot (2007). The world’s eight most important Ni-Cu-PGM camps include: Noril’sk (Russia), Sudbury (Ontario), Voisey’s Bay (Labrador), Pechenga (Russia), Thompson (Manitoba), Raglan (Quebec), Kambalda and the Yilgarn komatiites (Western Australia), and Jinchuan (China) Ni- Cu-PGM sulphide ores typically form by the equilibration of immiscible magmatic sulphide and silicate magma (Naldrett, 2004). The extent to which the sulphides are enriched in Ni, Cu, and platinum group metals (PGM) is then a measure of not only the composition of the parental magma, but is a function of the inherent efficiency of the chemical and physical processes of equilibration between the two melts (Naldrett, 2004). The classic occurrence of nickel sulphide ore deposits are as basal accumulations within tabular sheets of mafic or ultramafic rocks (Norlisk, Pechenga, Kambalda). Important deposits are also hosted within dyke swells or intrusive necks (where the feeder dykes join the intrusive body). The Jinchuan and Voisey’s Bay deposits represent well documented examples of this geometry (Figure 8-1) SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 31 Figure 8-1.Geology map and cross sections of the Jinchuan deposits (Lightfoot 2007). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 32 Several features are common to igneous systems that contain Ni sulphide mineralisation; these have been referred to as ‘key features’ and they are commonly used in evaluation of exploration opportunities. Some of the principal observations that relate to many, but importantly not all, major Ni sulphide deposits include such features as available source of metals (mafic and ultramafic magmas), a source of S to saturate the magma (e.g., sulphidic black shales), gravitational segregation of dense immiscible sulphide liquid, and concentration of the sulphides into physical traps at the base of intrusions, within conduits, or in rock bodies emplaced in transpressional shears. The geophysical signatures of nickel sulphide ore systems can (but don’t always) include magnetic high signatures, gravity highs, and/or either conductivity (due to the presence of massive sulphide) or chargeability (due to disseminated sulphides). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 33 9 Exploration TNN undertook exploration of the Property during the 2012 and 2013 summer field seasons and has spent $6,000,000 in work. This work included geologic mapping, geophysical and topographic surveys, structural studies, prospecting, and diamond drilling. Results built on the 2003 – 2010 programs completed by AAEC and have resulted in new sulphide discoveries and enabled a clearer understanding of the distribution and controls on mineralization. TNN initiated exploration on the Project in July, 2012. Revelation Geoscience based in Vancouver, British Columbia was contracted to operate the Project and Bradley Nuvumiut Drilling of Rouyn-Noranda, QC was contracted to complete the drilling program. The focus of 2012 exploration was to advance the Frontier Area, where high grade Ni-Cu-PGM mineralization had been intersected over potentially minable widths. In 2013, Equity Exploration based in Vancouver, British Columbia was contracted to operate the Project and conducted a program of detailed geologic mapping, prospecting and 3D structural studies, primarily over the Frontier area. Results were compiled into a new 1:1000 scale geological map and a series of North-South cross sections were constructed (see Appendix 3). 9.1 Diamond Drilling Significant Ni-Cu-PGE mineralized intervals were intersected in seven of 31 holes drilled during the 2012 summer program. These holes were drilled in the Seahawk A, Frontier East and Frontier South zones, and are tabulated along with other significant, historic intercepts in Table 10-1. A summary of previous drilling campaign and results can be found in section 10. 9.2 Geologic Mapping Detailed 1:1000 geologic mapping was undertaken during August, 2013, with a focus on the Frontier Area. Mapping was conducted on 25m centred, North-South lines which permitted geologists frequent opportunities to reconcile mapping differences line to line. Results were merged with diamond drill logs to generate a new series of NS cross sections on 25m centres, designed to serve as the basis for future geologic interpretation and target generation. The results have been integrated in the cross section interpretations that can be found in Appendix 3. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 34 9.3 Geophysics During the period 2003-2010, AAEC completed multiple programs of airborne and ground geophysical surveys which provided a comprehensive high quality dataset inherited by TNN. Property-wide airborne surveys were conducted early in the program, and included SpectrEM, AeroTEM and VTEM electromagnetic and magnetic surveys. Follow-up ground surveys were extensive, and included multiple campaigns of HLEM, TEM, moving loop TDEM, and magnetics. In addition, down hole pulse EM surveys were routinely conducted. A chronological summary of AAEC geophysical programs is presented in Table 6-2. In 2012, TNN conducted infill ground magnetic surveys over four areas: Frontier, Red Zone, Rain Day-CDC and Beverly. The purpose of this program of work was to acquire 25 meter line- spaced data to allow for detailed, 3D magnetic inversions at between 5 and 10 meter cell size. This high resolution data is used to model the location and form of the basal contacts of the host ultramafic intrusions in concert with EM plate modeling to target mineralized embayment sites along these geological contacts (Figure 9-1). Results of these magnetic surveys have been incorporated into the West Raglan Property magnetic base maps (Appendix 2). Consistent with previous AAEC programs TNN carried out borehole pulse electromagnetic surveys on 26 of 31 holes completed during the 2012 program. Borehole interpretations are those of Grant Lockhart, project geophysicist for Revelation Geoscience Ltd and are summarized elsewhere (Wells and Smerchanski, 2012). Figure 9-1. Long section showing mineralized bodies in red, and modeled conductive plates as blue squares. Topography and drill hole traces are also shown. 9.4 Topography A one-person crew from Chartiss Remote Sensing of Calgary, AB was contracted to complete a drone-borne photogrammetric survey over the Frontier area. All flights were flown at 300 meters above ground on pre-programmed flight lines. The result is high resolution, gridded and shaded topographic data which has been of significant value in detailed mapping of lithology and structure. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 35 9.5 Prospecting In 2012, a four person crew from Rio Minerals of Vancouver, BC was contracted to prospect and rock sample parts of the Beverly and Red target areas. The prospecting consisted of tightly spaced traverses focused on basal contacts of ultramafic units identified from the detailed ground magnetics, with emphasis on searching for any signs of disseminated nickel sulphide mineralization (Figure 9-2).. A sample of peridotite with finely disseminated sulphide from a new occurrence at Beverly returned 0.69% Ni, 0.28% Cu, 0.67 g/t Pd and 0.03 g/t Pt. In 2013, continued prospecting was undertaken by the same team working in the Seahawk, Central, Discovery, Century, Frontier, CDC, and Beverly Zones. Three samples collected from this locale returned 0.3–0.7% Ni, and 0.04-1.01 g/t PGM. Figure 9-2. Gossanous subcrop of lens 14 at Frontier Central displaying surface expression of mineralization within the West Raglan Property. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 36 9.6 Structural Studies Consultant Rogerio Monteiro conducted a preliminary, 3D structural study of the Discovery, 128, and 164 Lenses, based on new outcrop and drill core data. The methodology involved collection of key linear and planar data, including sulphide foliations and lineations, to better predict the 3D orientation of mineralized bodies. The overall objective was to utilize these data to improve success rates for future drilling programs. Results suggest that; while sulphide fabrics in some lenses are crudely parallel to the EW grain of regional geologic contacts; others are sharply discordant. This is deemed significant as historic drilling directions are almost universally North-South, or perpendicular to geological contacts as recorded on outcrop. Future drilling may well be justified on azimuths oblique to these lithologic contacts. 9.7 Exploration Summary Multiple programs of geochemical sampling, geophysics, surface mapping, and diamond drilling, were completed by AAEC and TNN over the period 2003-2013. Rock, till, and soil sampling programs have covered significant parts of the linear, East-West belts of ultramafic rocks, and have played an important, if subordinate role, in generating drill targets. Examples of compiled nickel geochemical data are presented in Appendix 1. Geophysical surveys over the Property, in a general sense, progressed from property-wide studies to focus on more specific areas of interest. Initial airborne geophysical surveys (2003- 2004) identified EM conductors related to sulphide accumulations and provided sufficiently detailed magnetics to define major ultramafic intrusive units. Subsequent ground geophysical surveys focused within developing areas of interest, refined geologic contacts and contributed to drill target definition (Appendix 2). Exploration targeting over the history of the Project has involved consistent application of multiple layers of geologic, geophysical, and geochemical data to generate new drill targets. This process has been iterative, with increasingly sophisticated, hybrid datasets providing powerful tools for interpreting results of previous drilling programs (Figure 9-2, Figure 9-3, Figure 9-4). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 37 Figure 9-3. Merged, EM and detailed topographic and imagery data, Frontier Zone (Perk et al., 2013) SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 38 Figure 9-4. Merged, detailed geologic mapping and ground magnetics data, Frontier Zone (Perk et al., 2013). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 39 Analysis of these varied datasets leads to a number of conclusions which have the potential to impact significantly on future exploration: Ultramafic rocks at the Frontier Zone are intrusive and not volcanic in origin, and comprise a limited number of weakly differentiated (peridotite-wherlite-pyroxenite) sill or dyke form intrusions. These intrusions are internally complex and are interpreted to be comprised of multiple pulses of channelized magma. Sulphide mineralization occurs both at contacts with the volcano-sedimentary host rocks and at internal ultramafic- ultramafic contacts. Basalt massifs outcropping in the central portion of the Frontier Zone have limited vertical continuity and in almost all instances where drilled can be seen to be underlain by ultramafic rocks. Overall map patterns suggest the current level of bedrock exposure at the Frontier Zone corresponds to the top of the main ultramafic sill complex where it is in contact with “roof pendants” of supracrustal rocks. This is consistent with the broad distribution of small basalt remnants intruded and/or underlain by a narrow carapace or hood of pyroxenite across the central part of the mapped area. That this pyroxenite hood is in turn underlain at shallow depths by wherlite is implied by the sectional interpretation, and observed directly in the Frontier Seahawk area. Consistent with mineralization elsewhere in the Raglan Belt, sulphide accumulations at West Raglan correspond to two basic types: “Contact” deposits at or very near ultramafic/basalt/sediment contacts (Discovery, Frontier South). These lenses tend to be complex in character; although higher grade mineralization is hosted by ultramafic rocks, sulphidic sediments - including sedimentary massive sulphide - occur in close proximity. Intimate interlayering of screens of ultramafic rock, basalt and sediment is common in drill holes, providing opportunity for a degree of physical and chemical interaction between magma and wallrock. Current interpretation is that second order structural/magmatic embayments are responsible for trapping (or preserving) mineralization. “Perched” deposits located on internal contacts between ultramafic units of similar composition (164 lens, Seahawk A). These deposits are enigmatic in character and much harder to predict respect location. Internal ultramafic contacts may be subtle, but generally display discontinuities in sulphide abundance and textures, olivine content (visual percentage) and olivine grain size. Review of highly detailed geochemical data crossing the 164 Lens documents repetitive, sub-metre scale variations in whole rock chemistry, perhaps indicative of a magma mixing event. These sub-meter scale variations are interpreted to form larger more coherent packages of similar small scale units representing magmatic pulses. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 40 10 Drilling 10.1 Introduction Diamond drilling at West Raglan has been carried out in sequential annual campaigns since 2003, with the exceptions of 2009, 2011, and 2013. Drilling operations were completed under contract with Bradley Nuvumiut, which is a joint venture between Bradley Core Drilling of Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, utilizing two, helicopter-portable, LD-250 diamond drill rigs. A total of 229 diamond drill holes have been drilled across the Property, for 43,541 meters (Figure 10-1). No drills were in operation at the time of the site visit in August, 2013, and the writers have therefore not been able to independently confirm diamond drilling, core logging, and sampling practices. Core logging, cutting, and sampling facilities and some drill core as well as a few historical drill sites were inspected. The following summary has been mostly gleaned from AAEC and TNN archival reports, and is believed to be true and accurate. Figure 10-1 Drill hole locations throughout the West Raglan area. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 41 10.2 Drilling Methods All drill hole setups were marked by placing pickets at predetermined locations using differential GPS. The drill rig was then sighted and aligned by a professional geologist prior to collaring the hole. A differential GPS survey of all historical drill hole collar locations was completed in 2012 by Revelation Geoscience. Locations recorded in the database were adjusted in a few cases where variances were greater than 2 meters and are now believed to represent better than 0.5 meters horizontal accuracy and better than 1.5 meters vertical accuracy. AAEC diamond drill holes were cored with BTW diameter, and TNN utilized NTW sized core barrels. No orientated core surveys were carried out during diamond drilling. Water utilized for drilling was sourced locally from ponds and seasonal creeks. In the case of early work by AAEC, dips and azimuths of drill holes were taken with a Maxibore II multi-shot system and later this evolved to using a Reflex Gyro to record deviation for both AAEC and TNN. During the 2012 Revelation collar survey all historical drill hole casings were measured with an APS unit to record azimuth and dip of the casing as a check on the drill database. Variances were determined to be within +/-1.5 degrees in all cases and no changes were made to the historical database. Diamond drilling was carried out on a 24-hour basis using 12-hour, day and night shifts After each hole was completed, drill sites were inspected to ensure that the site was clean and drill hole casings were capped and identified. Digital photographs of each site were taken before and after drilling. Inspection forms were completed and signed by Company representatives and the drill contractor’s foreman. Core was transported by helicopter to Chukotat Camp, where logging and sampling were conducted. 10.3 Core Logging Procedures In the case of AAEC, core logging observations and measurements were entered into Gemslogger software. In the case of TNN, logging data were captured directly into an Access database (X-Logger). Magnetic susceptibility measurements were taken systematically every 3 meters in each drill hole using a KT-9 magnetic susceptibility meter and later a KT-10 meter. A GDD MPP EM2F probe was used to record both magnetic susceptibility and conductivity measurements during the 2010 season. RQD was estimated and recorded for every hole. All cores were photographed both wet and dry for future reference.Geological information recorded during logging included: Lithology- mineralogy, silicate/oxide textures, and associated rock type, Alteration- mineralogy, intensity, resulting rock texture Structure – measurement of structural elements relative to the core axis; Mineralization – sulphide content, mineralogy, texture SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 42 The logging process as conducted by the geologist involved the recording of geologic information and magnetic susceptibility, and the definition, marking and numbering of sample intervals on the core and core boxes. Sample intervals were based on lithologic unit and sulphide mineral percentages in preference to meter by meter sampling. Minimum and maximum sample intervals of 0.5 and 1.5 meters were utilized by the TNN program. Core lengths sampled during the AAEC programs varied from 0.1 to 3m and greater sample lengths up to 27.5m were sampled through the ‘compositing’ of several visually similar samples of 0.2- 0.5m each over the interval in an effort to save on shipping and sampling costs. This method of ‘composite’ sampling has created difficulty in modeling low grades as pathfinders to mineralization. Figure 10-2. This core mosaic shows from right to left magmatic foliation (Smg) and sulphide blebs alignment (Ldbs) (conformable to foliation), progressively into a conformable magmatic and sulphide foliation (Ss). Note that massive sulphide veins and veinlets are nucleating and cutting both. Photo from Wells and Smerchanski 2013 (Vektore study). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 43 10.4 Core Storage With the exception of “show core” transported to Vancouver, all Project drill cores are stored at the Lac Chukotat camp core yard. Individual holes are stacked on pallets convenient to the core shack and to layout within the adjacent area. 10.5 Results Multiple sets of North-South oriented, West-facing geological sections have been generated by TNN geologists, using a variety of different software packages. When merged with surface geologic maps, these sections form the basis for interpretation of lithologic boundaries, structural features, and zones of sulphide mineralization. Figure 10-2 is an example of an interpreted cross section from this compilation work. The remainder of this generation of sections can be found in Appendix 3. A summary of significant drill intersections for the West Raglan Project is presented inTable 10-1. Figure 10-2shows a photo showing the typical sulphide textures in mineralized zones. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 44 Figure 10-3. Section 443925E, Seahawk A Lens. Interpretation merges historic drilling results with 2013 geologic mapping. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 45 Table 10-1 Significant drill intersections from West Raglan Project. From To Interval Nickel Copper Platinum Palladium Cobalt Drill hole ID (metres) (metres) (metres) % % g/t g/t % Frontier Central TR-12-025 40.00 48.23 8.23 0.76 0.28 0.24 0.71 0.03 WR-03-14 20.75 31.25 10.50 2.78 1.21 0.80 2.78 0.05 WR-03-16 63.75 70.00 6.25 3.49 1.46 0.51 2.08 0.08 WR-08-152 158.70 174.60 15.90 0.85 0.42 0.19 0.71 0.05 Frontier East TR-12-011 15.94 23.60 7.66 1.28 0.39 0.20 0.65 0.05 WR-03-12 15.50 31.00 15.50 1.20 0.81 0.28 1.03 0.04 WR-03-13 41.80 49.42 7.62 2.54 1.42 0.39 1.56 0.09 WR-03-17 50.80 68.00 17.20 1.16 0.55 0.23 0.87 0.03 WR-05-98 77.45 84.05 6.60 0.87 0.42 0.15 0.58 0.02 Frontier: Seahawk A TR-12-001 122.10 136.60 14.50 1.96 0.65 0.30 1.10 0.05 TR-12-006 129.81 138.74 8.93 0.75 0.29 0.15 0.80 0.03 WR-04-48 52.60 60.10 7.50 0.73 0.33 0.12 0.41 0.03 WR-07-130 152.00 157.00 5.00 2.38 1.38 0.70 2.39 0.05 WR-08-151 56.70 67.90 11.20 3.81 1.14 0.69 2.74 0.11 WR-08-164 132.30 141.70 9.4 0.71 0.33 0.12 0.48 0.02 WR-08-164 141.85 170.13 28.28 3.21 1.32 0.65 2.43 0.07 Frontier Seahawk B WR-04-47 44.50 61.25 16.75 0.78 0.31 0.44 0.44 0.02 Frontier South TR-12-010 99.00 114.00 15.00 1.64 0.62 0.22 0.22 0.04 TR-12-029 172.00 179.50 7.50 2.71 1.50 0.68 4.79 0.06 WR-03-04 0.00 10.00 10.00 0.88 0.54 0.32 1.25 0.02 WR-03-08 15.00 35.00 20.00 2.41 0.92 0.66 2.28 0.06 WR-04-57 4.00 12.50 8.50 1.83 0.93 0.50 1.91 0.04 WR-04-69 77.50 88.10 10.60 0.76 0.35 0.11 0.48 0.02 WR-04-74 15.60 30.50 14.90 2.52 1.07 0.37 1.50 0.06 WR-05-100 118.80 128.00 9.20 1.89 0.60 0.26 1.06 0.05 WR-06-113 125.00 143.60 18.60 1.34 0.68 0.26 1.00 0.04 WR-06-125 161.65 171.50 9.85 0.89 0.27 0.26 1.03 0.02 WR-07-128 157.60 186.25 28.65 1.06 0.36 0.24 0.96 0.03 WR-07-128 217.20 223.10 5.90 2.98 0.68 0.41 1.61 0.07 WR-07-142 246.60 253.90 7.30 2.72 2.07 0.65 2.43 0.07 WR-08-149 132.20 144.26 12.06 1.50 0.71 0.26 1.03 0.04 Drill composites were calculated using a cut-off of 0.5% Nickel, a minimum composite grade of 0.7% Nickel, and a minimum composite length of 5 metres, a minimum internal dilution grade of 0.2% Nickel and a maximum internal dilution length of 2 metres. Drill intersections are reported as drilled thicknesses. True widths of the mineralized intervals are interpreted to be between 60-100% of the reported lengths. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 46 Figure 10-4. Key map for the significant mineralized drill intersections included in Table 10-1. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 47 11 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security 11.1 Sample Security, Preparation and Analysis 11.1.1 AAEC 2003-2011 All samples collected by AAEC in 2003 are believed to have been transported by air from the Lake Chukotat camp to Salluit where they were shipped via commercial airline to Montreal and then by Purolator to ACME Analytical Laboratories (“ACME”), Vancouver. The drill core samples were crushed to > 70% passing a 10 mesh screen, followed by splitting off of a 250g sub- sample that was then pulverized to > 95% passing 150 mesh. A 1g sub-sample was then treated using a hot aqua regia digest followed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry analysis (“ICP-ES”) in 2003 (Group 7AR). The elements analyzed and their lower orders of detection (“LODs”) are as follows: Mo (0.001%), Cu (0.001%), Pb (0.01%), Zn (0.01%), Ag (0.3 g/t), Ni (0.001%), Co (0.001%), Mn (0.01%), Fe (0.01%), As (0.01%), Sr (0.001%), Cd (0.001%), Sb (0.001%), Bi (0.01%), Ca (0.01%), P (0.001%), Cr (0.001%), Mg (0.01%), Al (0.01%), Na (0.01%), K (0.01%), W (0.001%)and Hg (0.001%). The samples were also analyzed for Pt, Pd, Au and Rh using a 30 g silver inquart lead collection fire assay (Group 3B-MS) with LODs of 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 0.05 ppb, respectively. Between 2004 and 2010, samples were shipped to La Grande (LG2), Quebec by private charter plane from the Lake Chukotat camp. The samples were then transported by road from La Grande to Val d’Or. The samples were prepared at Bourlemaque Assay Lab in Val d’Or in 2004 but no details of the preparation procedure used are available. However, the samples are assumed to have been prepared following a similar process to that subsequently used at ALS Minerals. Pulp splits were sent to both ACME and ALS Minerals using a ground courier service (Purolator). Beginning in 2005, core samples were sent directly to ALS Minerals in Vancouver from Val d’Or by road, although it appears some preparation work was done at the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Val d’Or in subsequent years and only pulp splits were transported. Once in Vancouver, the samples were dried, crushed to >70% less than 2mm, and 250g riffle split and pulverized to >85% less than 75 microns. In 2008 AAEC modified the preparation procedures to include quartz washes of both the crushing and pulverizing equipment between samples, and increased the crushing efficiency to >90% less than 2mm and pulverizing efficiency to >90% less than 75 microns. The aqua regia digestion was replaced by a sodium peroxide fusion followed by acid digestion and analysis by ICP-ES at ALS Minerals in Vancouver between 2004 and 2010 (method ME- ICP81). The elements analyzed and their LODs are as follows: Al (0.01%), As (0.01%), Ca (0.01%), Co (0.002%), Cr (0.01%), Cu (0.005%), Fe (0.05%), K (0.1%), Mg (0.01%), Mn (0.01%), Ni (0.005%), Pb (0.01%), S (0.01%), Si (0.01%), Ti (0.01%) and Zn (0.01%). There was also a determination of Mg using a 4-acid digestion with an atomic absorption spectrometry (“AAS”) finish at ALS in 2004. The precious metals continued to be analyzed by ACME using Group 3B-MS in 2004 but, beginning in 2005, the samples were fire assayed at ALS Minerals SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 48 using a 30g silver inquart lead collection fire assay with an ICP-ES finish (method PGM-ICP23) for Au, Pt and Pd with LODs of 1, 5 and 1 ppb, respectively. Bulk densities during this period were determined on representative core samples in the field using the water displacement method. 11.1.2 Quality Assurance and Quality Control The ALS Minerals quality management system is accredited by the International Organization for Standards (“ISO”) 9001:2008. In addition, the ALS Minerals Vancouver laboratory is accredited by the ISO and International Electrotechnical Commission (“IEC”) 17025:2005 for Au, Pt, and Pd by lead collection fire assay with an ICP finish, as well as multi-element analyses by ICP-ES following a sodium peroxide digestion. It is not known whether this accreditation extended back to 2004 when samples were initially shipped to ALS Minerals. Both commercially available certified and in-house standard reference materials (“CRMs“ and “SRMs“) were inserted with the core samples prior to analyses at both ACME and ALS Minerals. In the case of samples sent to ALS Minerals, these were inserted at the Val d’Or preparation lab but were disguised from the laboratory as to their exact nature. A series of ¼ core duplicate (field duplicates) were submitted during the sampling program. In addition, requests were made for the analysis of preparation (crusher) duplicate samples and a series of sieve tests were conducted in 2005 by AAEC to check the percentage of crushed sample material <2mm was conducted. Bulk densities were periodically analyzed at ALS Minerals for comparison with field- based analyses to ensure reproducibility. The quality control (“QC”) data were reviewed periodically by AAEC and there is evidence of re- assays being requested from ALS Minerals, suggesting at least some quality assurance (“QA”) was in place between 2003 and 2010. The QC data were also reviewed by CSA Global in 2012 as part of re-establishing a drill hole database and data verification process conducted in 2012 (Arne, 2012) and summarised in the following section. Certificates were obtained for most of the commercially available CRMs used by AAEC and by the laboratories. Details of other standard reference materials used in the latter stages of the West Raglan project were obtained from an internal AAEC memo (Barr, 2007). Accuracy control charts were constructed using the expected value of the CRM taken from the certificates of analysis where these were available. Where these were not available, the expected value was taken to be the mean value calculated from repeat analysis of the standard. Control lines were constructed using the standard deviation (“SD”) of the accepted data from the round robin analyses used to certify the CRM where this information was available. Where this information was not available, (for example, some of the Canmet CRMs) control lines of +/- 20% and 30% were substituted for the SDs. Original spreadsheet files were not available for approximately 10% of the drill hole data, and so data quality cannot be independently verified for these samples. The QC data have been evaluated using the following criteria: 1) Any individual analyses more than 3 standard deviations (SD) above or below the expected value for the CRM are considered a failure. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 49 2) Two or more consecutive values greater than 2 SD above or below the expected value and in the same sense (positive or negative) are considered to be failures, and are usually associated with a bias in the data. 3) A mean bias greater than a 5% variance from the expected value is considered to be unacceptable. It should be borne in mind that the use of a mean bias may disguise significant periodic biases in the data related to machine calibration issues, so examination of the control charts is necessary. 4) A blank analysis greater than 10 times the lower limit of detection (LLD) is considered to be clear evidence of contamination where sample labeling mistakes can be discounted, as there is often quantization of data within an order of magnitude of the LLD. 5) Duplicate pairs (field, crusher, pulp) having more than a 10% relative difference are considered to be imprecise. 11.1.2.1 Data Accuracy Drill hole data from six analytical batches (51 QC samples) generated by ACME in 2003 were evaluated. It was not possible to assess QAQC data where assay data were not available from original spreadsheet files. Certificates were not available for all standards and therefore the most emphasis has been placed on data from commercial CRMs (eg. Oreas 14P) currently still available. Where no certificate for the standard was available, and data for the same standard were available from the ALS Minerals data, then the mean and standard deviations from the ALS Minerals data were used to determine control limits for the ACME data. While not ideal, this approach allows an evaluation of most of the ACME QAQC data. Standard deviations for control purpose were derived from the mean of the ACME data where no independent controls were available (eg. R2). These limits test internal consistency, or precision, of the data, rather than its accuracy. A listing of the standards used (both CRMs and standard reference materials) and the results from their assessment are summarized in Table 1. The overall pass rate for the standards used in 2013 is 82% using the rules previously defined. Table 11-1 Summary of historical Acme QAQC data from 2003. Standard No. of Analyses QC Failures Oreas 13P 3 0 BAS2 12 5 FA10R 9 0 Oreas 14P 13 3 SO17 5 1 Canmet WMS1 3 0 Canmet WPR1 6 3 (base metals – possible errors) Totals 51 9 SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 50 A total of 4291 drill core samples were assayed at ALS Minerals in Vancouver between 2004 and 2010. An additional 596 CRMs and 504 duplicate samples were also analyzed, for a total QC sample to core sample ratio of 1:4, which is a very high percentage of quality control samples. There are therefore more than sufficient data from a wide range of matrix-suitable CRMs analyzed at ALS Minerals for a rigorous assessment of data quality to be undertaken of drill core assays between 2004 and 2010. A statistical summary of QAQC performance from CRMs is summarized in Table 11-2. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 51 Table 11-2 Summary of historical quality control data from ALS between 2004 and 2010 with failures (in brackets) listed by standard and element. Standard Ni Cu Co Pt Pd (failures) (failures) (failures) (failures) (failures) Blank 91 (3) 94 (1) 98 (1) 149 (1) 149 (1) MR FW05/1 n/a n/a n/a 10 (0) 10 (5) MR HW05/1 n/a n/a n/a 9 (0) 9 (1) Oreas 13P 169 (5) 169 (0) 169 (47) 12 (8) 12 (0) Oreas 14P 39 (0) 39 (2) 39 (12) n/a n/a Oreas 72a 9 (0) 11 (0) 11 (0) 2 (1) 2 (0) Oreas 73a 3 (0) 3 (0) 3 (0) 2 (0) 2 (0) Oreas74a 14 (0) 14 (0) 14 (2) 31 (1) 31 (1) Oreas75a 1 (0) 1 (0) 1 (0) 11 (0) 11 (0) Oreas76a n/a n/a n/a 3 (0) 3 (0) Oreas77a 3 (1) 3 (1) 3 (1) 3 (1) 3 (1) Canmet 8 (0) 8 (1) 8 (0) 42 (0) 42 (1) WMG1 Canmet 8 (0) 8 (0) 8 (0) 11 (4) 11 (2) WMS1 Canmet n/a n/a n/a 13 (0) 13 (0) WPR1 BAS2 13 (1) 12 (2) 13 (0) n/a n/a Totals 358 (9) 362 (7) 367 (63) 298 (16) 298 (12) Compliance 97% 98% 83% 95% 96% Field 244 (77) 236 (51) 244 (18) 95 (12) 112 (50) duplicates Compliance 68% 78% 97% 87% 55% Prep 195 (15) 192 (13) 194 (14) 142 (7) 124 (5) duplicates Compliance 92% 93% 93% 95% 96% Pulp 154 (10) 148 (3) 152 (1) 44 (2) 54 (5) duplicates Compliance 94% 98% 99% 95% 91% SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 52 Aside from a single possible case of cross contamination, the Pt data from the blanks are acceptable. A standard developed from a sample of Merensky Reef footwall material (MR FW05/1) shows evidence of a slight negative bias, but the analyses are otherwise acceptable. The Pt data from Oreas 13p are generally poor. By contrast, the Pt data from Oreas 74a, Oreas 75a, WPR1 and WMG1 are excellent; aside from one possible mistakenly identified CRM. Data from WMS1 are inconsistent. Overall, the quality of the Pt assays is very good. As with the Pt data, Pd data from MR FW05/1 show a negative bias, although data from MR HW05/1 are very good, with one exception. Data from the Oreas CRMs 13p, 74a, 75a, 76a and 77a are generally good, although with a slight negative bias. By contrast, data for the Canmet CRMs WMG1, WMS1 and WPR1 are generally very accurate, apart from several clear failures. Aside from such clear cases, which may have been a sample labelling issue, there are also a couple of possible examples of cross contamination of Pd. The Ni data from Oreas 13p show very little bias, but show more variability than expected for normally distributed data (Figure 11-1). Data for Oreas 14p are acceptable, but there is a suggestion of a slight negative bias. Nickel data from the other Oreas CRMs, 72a, 73a, 74a, 75a and 77a are all acceptable, apart from one possible mistakenly identified sample. Data from the Canmet CRMs WMS1 and WMG1 are also excellent, although there is a clear decreasing trend over time in the Ni data for WMS1. Aside from one extreme case, which is likely to be an error in CRM labelling, there is no clear evidence for Ni cross contamination in the blank data using the criteria listed previously. Figure 11-1. Summary of Ni fusion data for Oreas 13p from ALS Minerals between 2003 and 2011. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 53 There is evidence for drift in the Cu data over time for CRM Oreas 13p (Figure 11-2), but the data all remain within acceptable limits. The Cu data for Oreas 14p show evidence for a slight negative bias, with two clear QC failures. Data for the remaining Oreas CRMs, 72a, 73a, 74a, 75a, and 77a all lie within acceptable limits, aside from one sample. There is one clear QC failure for the Canmet CRMs WMG1 and WMS1, but overall, the data are very good. There is a single extreme case of elevated Cu in one of the blanks that also has elevated Ni, suggesting that the sample has been incorrectly labeled. Figure 11-2 Summary of Cu fusion for Oreas 13p from ALS Minerals between 2003 and 2011. The Co data for Oreas 13p are too close to the lower limit of detection to be precise but, overall, the accuracy of the data is good. Cobalt levels in Oreas 14p are higher than in 13p, and the more recent data show evidence of a clear negative bias. Apart from one exception, Co data for the Oreas CRMs, 72a, 73a, 74a, 75a and 77a are all acceptable, as are the data from the Canmet CRMs WMG1 and WMs1. There is one blank with a significant level of Co more than 10 times the lower limit of detection. 11.1.2.2 Data Precision Precision data calculated from duplicate pairs analyzed by ALS Minerals are summarized in Table 11-2. The quarter core field duplicate data show the most variability, with the exception of Co. As expected, data precision improves for crusher duplicate pairs and then improves again slightly for the pulp duplicate pairs. Overall, the precision of the Ni, Cu, Co, Pt and Pd pulp duplicate data are within acceptable bounds, with greater than 90% of preparation and pulp duplicate pairs having a relative difference of less than 10%. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 54 11.1.2.3 Summary Statement It is the opinion of the author responsible for this section that, as far as these can be verified, the security of sample transport, sample preparation and analytical methods used by AAEC from the period 2003 and 2010 for core samples were adequate and QAQC procedures either met or exceeded accepted industry standards for the time. 11.2 TNN 2012 11.2.1 Sample Security, Preparation and Analysis In 2012 half-core samples were sawn and placed into sample bags by geotechnical staff contracted to Revelation Geoscience Ltd (“Revelation”). Samples were placed into rice bags for transport and each bag sealed with a unique security tag. The samples within each bag were recorded and each shipment identified by a unique identifier number. Sample shipments were flown by chartered aircraft to Iqaluit where an expediter contracted to Revelation unloaded the samples and retained them in a secure area. The samples were then shipped to Ottawa by First Air where they were collected by Manitoulin Transport and shipped by truck to the ACME preparation facility in Timmins, Ontario. The samples were entered into the laboratory information system in Timmins and Revelation was notified of arrival through a confirmation “Request for Analysis” by email. The analytical methods employed for the 2012 drilling program were selected to conform with the bulk of the previous analytical data generated for the project by AAEC. The samples were dried, passed through a jaw crusher and a 250g split of <10 mesh material was pulverized to a nominal 85% passing 200 mesh (<75 microns) in Timmins. This pulp was transported by air to the main ACME laboratory facility in Vancouver where a 0.5g split of <200 mesh material was digested with a sodium peroxide fusion followed by acid digestion and an ICP-ES finish (Group 7PF2). The elements analyzed, and their LODs, were: Al (0.01%), As (0.007%), Ca (0.006%), Co (0.001%), Cr (0.006%), Cu (0.008%), Fe (0.02%), K (0.02%), Li (0.001%), Mg (0.01%), Mn (0.001%), Ni (0.002%), Pb (0.003%), S (0.01%), Sn (0.005%), Ti (0.002%), and Zn (0.002%). The precious metals (Pd, Pt and Au) were analyzed by 30g silver inquart lead collection fire assay (Group 606) having a LOD of 0.01 ppm for all three elements. Bulk densities were determined for selected core samples using the water displacement method (Method G813). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 55 11.2.1.1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control The ACME quality management system is also ISO 9001:2008 accredited and the Vancouver laboratory is accredited by ISO/IEC 17025:2005 for Au analyses by lead collection fire assay, but not using an ICP finish. It is not an accredited facility for the analysis of either Pt or Pd by fire assay, or multi-element analyses by sodium peroxide fusion. A documented QAQC program was implemented in 2013 that included the insertion of blind, matrix-matched CRMs and blanks at the ratio of 1:11. CRMs were purchased from reputable suppliers immediately prior to use – Ore Research & Exploration and CDN Resource Laboratories, and were stored in air-tight packages until needed. Data for the internal CRMs used by ACME, some of which were also obtained from CDN Resource Laboratories, were also assessed, and these were included at a ratio of 1:3, to give a total of 618 CRMs for 1278 samples, or approximately 1:2 overall. Field duplicates (28) consisting of quarter core duplicate samples were inserted at the ratio of 1:46. Preparation duplicates (72), consisting of a duplicate analysis of the <10 mesh crusher material, were analyzed at a ratio of 1:18, and pulp duplicate analyses (166) were performed at the ratio of 1:8. Re-assays were requested for those sample batches where the quality of the QC data was considered to be inadequate. Logging data and sample information, including the insertion of blind CRMs and quarter core duplicate samples, were captured in the field using a X-Logger AccessTM database. The data were then uploaded by Revelation Geoscience into Maxwell Geosciences’ DataShedTM for validation and QA assessment once assays were received directly from the laboratory. Graphical summaries of both the blind (external) and laboratory (internal) QC data were generated in DataShedTM using the QAQCRTM module for quality assurance purposes during the drilling program and for a final assessment of the QC data at the end of the program by Revelation Geoscience (Arne 2012). Revelation Geoscience Ltd was acquired by CSA Global Pty Ltd in June of 2012. 11.2.1.2 Data Accuracy Overall, the accuracy of the data is considered to be good for Ni based on an assessment of the QC data using the rules outlined previously (Table 11-3). There are negative biases in the Ni (Figure 11-3) and Cu (Figure 11-4) data of just under 5%, and a significant negative bias in the range of 5 to 10% for the Co data, even when QC data for the Acme Labs CRM Oreas 14P in the first few batches are excluded because the initial CRM used was poorly stored and had oxidized. Although Pd CRMs containing less than 0.5 ppm Pd display a significant negative bias, these CRMs have values within an order of magnitude of the LOD and so are not suitable for the assessment of accuracy for the method employed (Group 606). The CRMs with greater than 0.5 ppm Pd have returned acceptable results (Figure 11-5). The Pt results for the CRMs are good overall, with both positive and negative biases less than 5%. The poor performance of the CRMs containing low levels of precious metals is not unexpected when using assay methods, as these are likely to be imprecise within an order of magnitude of the lower limit of detection. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 56 Table 11-3 Summary of QC data from ACME in 2012 with failures (in brackets) listed by standard and element. n/a = not applicable. Standard Ni (failures) Cu (failures) Co (failures) Pt (failures) Pd (failures) G1-TIM- ACME 22 (1) 22 (0) 22 (0) 22 (1) 22 (0) CDN-BL10 46 (5) 46 (0) 46 (0) 46 (2) 46 (0) CDN-ME-10 15 (0) 15 (9) 15 (1) 15 (3) 15 (2) CDN-ME-9 16 (1) 16 (2) 16 (3) 16 (0) 16 (1) CDN-ME-9 ACME 66 (3) 66 (4) 66 (6) n/a n/a CDN-PGMS-19 n/a n/a n/a 62 (5) 62 (1) CDN-PGMS-23 n/a n/a n/a 14 (1) 14 (0) Oreas 75a 16 (0) 16 (10) 16 (7) 16 (3) 16 (5) Oreas 14p 13 (0) 13 (0) 13 (5) 13 (3) 13 (5) Oreas 14p ACME 51 (5) 51 (7) 51 (31) n/a n/a PD1 - ACME 74 (0) 74 (0) 74 (0) 74 (2) 74 (4) Totals 319 (15) 319 (32) 319 (53) 278 (20) 278 (18) Compliance 95% 90% 83% 93% 93% Field duplicates 28 (5) 28 (8) 28 (0) 28 (2) 28 (9) Compliance 68% 78% 97% 87% 55% Prep duplicates 72 (3) 72 (0) 72 (0) 72 (2) 72 (2) Compliance 96% 100% 100% 97% 97% Pulp duplicates 123 (3) 123 (1) 123 (0) 123 (0) 123 (1) Compliance 98% 99% 100% 100% 99% SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 57 Figure 11-3 Slight negative bias in Ni data evident in ACME internal CRM CDN-ME-9. Figure 11-4 Negative bias in Cu data evident in ACME internal CRM CDN-ME-9. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 58 Figure 11-5 Analytical data for Pd from ACME internal CRM CDN-PGMS-19. 11.2.2 Data Precision The precision of the data improves in moving from field duplicates to preparation and pulp duplicates, as measured by an increasing percentage of duplicate pairs with a relative difference of less than 10%. The precision of the pulp duplicate pairs is considered to be acceptable as typically less than 2% of the duplicate pairs have a difference greater than 10%. 11.2.3 Summary Statement It is the opinion of the author responsible for this section of the report that sample security, preparation and analyses were all adequate during the 2012 drill program and met current industry conventions. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 59 12 Data Verification 12.1 AAEC 2003 to 2011 Historical drill core assay data were provided to Revelation Geosciences Ltd (now owned by CSA Global Canada Geosciences Ltd) in May and June, 2012 by TNN from a variety of sources. These sources included a GemcomTM drill hole database supplied by AAEC, both digital and hard copies of laboratory files, exports from the Snowdon AAEC geochemistry web portal and exports from an acQuireTM database supplied by AAEC. Only the latter database contained information on the historical quality control samples included with the submissions. The main GemcomTM data files (collars, survey, lithology, assay, whole rock geochemistry) were validated by TNN and provided to CSA Global Pty Ltd for loading into a new DataShedTM database in mid-2012. The available original laboratory spreadsheet files provided by AAEC to TNN were also loaded to replace the GemcomTM assay and geochemistry fields where laboratory data were available. These data were validated against the GemcomTM data file and were generally found to be in good agreement. Where digital assay certificates were not available, the data source remained the original GemcomTM data file. Subsequent to the creation of the database, original copies of Certificates of Analysis (CoA) and spreadsheet files were obtained from both ACME and ALS Minerals with the permission of AAEC, and additional hard copies of the CoAs were provided by AAEC for 2003 and 2004. The CoAs have been used to validate the ALS Minerals assay data in the DataShedTM database through random spot checks. Minor discrepancies observed between the database and the original laboratory files for a few samples are not of a significant nature and probably relate to re-assays or multiple analyses of some sample intervals by different methods. Collar locations for drill holes in the Frontier area were re-surveyed during the 2012 field season using a Trimble GeoXH handheld differential global positioning system (”DGPS”) receiver with post-processing of the data in order to validate their locations. It is the opinion of the author responsible for this section of the report that the TNN DataShedTM database generated by CSA Global Pty Ltd represents an accurate record of the historical assay data obtained by AAEC for the West Raglan project and that the data quality is adequate for the purposes for which it is used in this report. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 60 12.2 TNN 2012 All logging and assay data were captured digitally during the 2012 drilling program. The information was validated with DataShedTM by CSA Global Pty Ltd and errors corrected where found. Collar locations were surveyed using the same Trimble DGPS described previously (Wells, 2013). Downhole surveys were undertaken using a Reflex Gyro but there was no independent validation of the survey results. Collar azimuth and inclination were checked using a Reflex APS. Assay results from the 2012 final database from an exported spreadsheet file were checked against the original assay certificates issued by ACME for the purposes of this report. Randomly selected samples from each assay certificate were checked against the database export to confirm integrity of the data. The author responsible for this section of the report considers the 2012 data to be adequate for the purposes for which it is used in this report. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 61 13 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing The West Raglan Project is an early stage exploration project; no metallurgical testwork has been completed. 14 Mineral Resource Estimates The West Raglan Project is an early stage exploration project; no mineral resource estimate has been completed. 15 Mineral Reserve Estimate The West Raglan Project is an early stage exploration project; no mineral reserve estimate has been completed. 16 Mining Methods The West Raglan Project is an early stage exploration project; no mining methods have been investigated for the project. 17 Recovery Methods The West Raglan Project is an early stage exploration project; no recovery methods have been investigated for the project. 18 Project Infrastructure The Lac Chukotat camp currently has the capacity to house 50 people and includes two helipads, a wooden kitchen building, a shower and laundry facility, and several small wooden shacks (driller’s laundry, driller’s dry, helicopter mechanics storage, and tool sheds). Offices and sleeping quarters are either prospector-style canvas tents or Weatherhaven tents, all with wooden floors. A core-logging facility and rock saw tent are located adjacent the helipads. Fresh water is sourced from a nearby creek, treated with filtration and UV light, and tested regularly to ensure absence of colliform. The camp was occupied by the 2013 exploration team and found to be in good condition, with ample equipment and field supplies for future programs. Inventory was taken of all of the equipment and buildings, and a list of equipment needed for future exploration programs was compiled (Perk et al, 2013). Improvements to the fuel storage, walkways, buildings and camp infrastructure were ongoing throughout the short field program. Seasonal and annual maintenance were completed on the two main generators, all water systems were drained and the camp was winterized. Although there is no indigenous population at site, residents of Salluit worked at Chukotat Camp as assistant core technicians, core cutters, and as general camp workers. Additionally, local laborers and equipment operators from Salluit were hired to move supplies and equipment from the dock to the staging area for transport to Chukotat camp. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 62 19 Market studies and Contracts The West Raglan Project is an early stage exploration project; no market studies have been completed. 20 Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact 20.1 Environment and Permitting AAEC carried out environmental studies on the property from 2004 to 2011. Work focused on baseline chemical studies of stream and lake sediments and waters across the Project Area. Studies were typically conducted by a third party environmental consultancy, with the exception of 2008 when they were done internally. Activities focused on assuring that neither camp function nor exploration work had materially affected water quality (Roche, 2012). In 2012, True North Nickel continued the water quality studies begun by Anglo American with a water sampling program across the property conducted by Revelation Geoscience. During annual field programs, material such as empty drums, used oils, batteries and scrap metal were shipped annually to Quebec City on the last sealift of the year. Appropriate disposal and recycling were done through Genivar, a third party environmental company. Genivar submitted a report to AAEC on an annual basis once disposal and recycling were complete. During the most recent field program in 2013, empty drums were flown out of Chukotat camp to Salluit as weather and resources allowed, and full drums were brought back to Chukotat camp to replace fuel that was utilized during the program. The pilot remained behind in Salluit until August 27th to continue moving fuel drums from and to camp, and returning empty drums to Salluit. Drums were stacked neatly and weighted with drill rods (Perk et al., 2013). 20.2 Social and Community Impact Since project inception, people from the Northern Village of Salluit have been hired to work on the project as equipment operators, kitchen helpers, core and sample technicians and for camp maintenance and operations. Bradley Nuvumiut employs a number of local Inuit as drill helpers and ~17% of the work force at Glencore’s Raglan Mine are Inuit from Nunavik (Dombrowksi et al, 2011). This implies that there is a growing pool of skilled workers that could participate in future campaigns. Previous consultations with the local communities have shown that employment and respect for the environment and wildlife represent the cornerstones of community relations. TNN understands that close cooperation and communication is going to be crucial to obtaining the social license to further develop the West Raglan project. Consultation with the local stakeholders for future exploration or development programs should be an integral part of project planning. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 63 21 Capital and Operating Costs The West Raglan Project is an early exploration project; no capital and operating costs have been established. 22 Economic Analysis The West Raglan Project is an early exploration project; no economic analyses have been established. 23 Adjacent Properties The West Raglan Property is located in the centre of the Cape Smith Nickel Belt in northern Quebec, Canada. The Cape Smith Belt hosts several high-grade nickel sulphide deposits, including two producing Ni-Cu-PGM operations; Glencore’s Raglan Mine and Jilin Jien Nickel’s Nunavik Mine (Figure 23-1). The neighboring Raglan Mine hosts similar clusters of mineralized lenses in 12 distinct zones, four of which are currently in production and feeding a central mill facility (Lesher, 2007). SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 64 Figure 23-1 Adjacent properties to West Raglan (Figure Provided by TNN) 23.1 Glencore’s Raglan Mine Glencore’s Raglan Mine has been in operation for more than 15 years and has been producing between 1 and 1.3Mt of ore per year for most of that time. The geological context of this mine operation is amply described in Item 7 of this report, due to its analogous geological context and economic importance. The resources and reserves reported in their 2013 annual report are shown in theTable 23-1. The qualified person has been unable to verify this information and the resource and reserve statement is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on the property that is the subject of this technical report. Table 23-1. Reserve and Resources for Glencore’s Raglan Mine. Taken from 2013 Annual Report. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 65 23.2 Jilin Jien Nickel’s Nuvilik Mine Jilin Jien Nickel started operations at its Nuvilik mine in 2013. This company is not publicly traded so there is little information that is available since they purchased the mine’s previous owner (Canadian Royalties) in 2010. The geological context of this mine operation is described in Item 7 of this report. All of the deposits described are located within the “South Trend” which typically show lower overall Ni tenors. Higher grade deposits such as Mesamax are composed primarily of massive or semi-massive sulphides (Table 23-2). The qualified person has been unable to verify this information and the resource and reserve statement is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on the property that is the subject of this technical report. Table 23-2. Compilation of Reserves and Resources belonging to Jilin Jien. Data was obtained from technical reports dated 2008 to 2010 from Sedar.com (see references). Ivakkak Ivakkak Méquillon Puimajuq Mesamax Expo Pit UG Resources Allammaq Resources Resources Probable Reserves Indicated Inferred Measured Indicated Inferred Indicated Tonnage (Mt) 2.08 7.84 0.60 0.20 5.37 3.09 0.56 3.76 1.59 0.21 Ni (%) 1.85 0.68 1.22 2.28 0.74 0.82 0.93 0.90 0.47 1.64 Cu (%) 2.49 0.69 1.53 2.73 1.07 1.12 1.10 1.11 0.53 2.73 Co (%) 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.06 Au (ppm) 0.19 0.07 0.16 0.21 0.23 0.18 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.09 Pt (ppm) 0.95 0.29 0.67 1.04 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.50 0.28 0.92 Pd (ppm) 3.46 1.25 3.22 4.90 2.65 2.57 2.66 2.18 1.15 2.48 24 Other Relevant Data and Information All relevant information is within other sections, and there is nothing further to add that is material to the property in question. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 66 25 Interpretation and Conclusions Existing work is significant in breadth and scope, and some of drill results are remarkable: 28.28m grading 3.21% Ni, 1.32% Cu, 2.43g/t Pd, 0.65g/t Pt and 10.5m grading 2.78% Ni, 1.21% Cu, 2.78g/t Pd and 0.80g/t Pt (Frontier Zone Target). To date, however, no resource estimates have been undertaken, because most of the significant intersections do not have sufficient geological support to understand the orientations and extents of the mineralized bodies. The authors believe that the “Exploration Target Potential” exists to identify a deposit of 5Mt to 20Mt grading between 1% and 3% Ni for this property. This statement is supported by the geologically favorable factors for the property: 1. Geological disposition within a world class Ni mining camp; 2. Presence of large volume of ultramafic rocks which are characterized by abundant examples of sulphide saturation, accompanied by anomalous Ni and Pd values over broad areas; 3. Dozens of untested conductivity targets from airborne (0-100m depth) and surface surveys (0-300m); 4. An expanded genetic model which has increased the number of high priority targets. The “Exploration Target Potential” described above refers to a conceptual quantity and grade of mineralized material that is based on geological information and interpretation, but lacks sufficient data density to be declared a ‘Mineral Resource’, under CIM and NI 43-101 guidelines. This estimate is conceptual in nature, information is insufficient to declare resources, and it is uncertain whether further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource. SGS Geostat concludes that exploration and drilling including sample handling, logging and analysis were done according to conventional industry standards and conform to generally accepted best practices. The authors are confident that the protocols and methodology used by TNN are appropriate and data produced thereof is suitable for the completion of a NI 43-101 Technical Report. Significant exploration has been conducted on the property, including 229 diamond drill holes for a total 43,541 meters, property scale mapping, detailed 1:1000 geological target mapping, ground geophysical, geochemical, and photogrammetric surveys. TNN has discovered significant mineralized zones across their property through prospecting and drilling. Given the historic success, complex geological setting and multiple target horizons at West Raglan the authors strongly believe that further exploration is warranted, and should result in discovery of additional mineralized bodies. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 67 26 Recommendations 26.1 Drilling Recommendations The West Raglan Property hosts a great volume of ultramafic rock with abundant examples of sulphide saturation. Exploration based on the “classic Raglan model” has resulted in several significant discoveries and a resource estimation should eventually be completed. The “canoe- shaped intrusion” model has not been tested on the property and could result in additional, major discoveries. Controls on mineralization in these geological environments can be complex, and successful exploration requires a persistent and systematic approach. Further delineation drilling of existing mineralized lenses is strongly recommended (Table 26-1) and is considered likely to discover additional thickened zones of mineralization. Six other zones on the property, in addition to the Frontier Area, have good indications of prospectivity as illustrated by the presence of disseminated nickel sulphide mineralization in surface rock samples and in limited reconnaissance drilling. Drilling in these sectors should focus on shallow, discrete conductors directly associated with ultramafic rocks. Prior to commencing the next drill campaign, a review of the geophysical and geological data should be undertaken to identify new targets and rank them according to their prospectivity, proximity to surface and size potential. 26.2 Other Recommendations Future work should evaluate the claims with a new geophysical tool to evaluate if there are any blind targets that have yet to be tested. TNN has suggested that a high resolution low level helicopter gravity survey (heliFalcon) of maximum 75 meter line spacing should enable the identification of shallow deposits due to the moderate density contrasts between the sulphide mineralization and the olivine pyroxenite host rocks. Modelling completed by Grant Lockhart using the parameters of the Frontier Zone’s 164 lens and generic parameters from mineralization on other deposits in the South Trend of the Cape Smith Belt supports this thesis. Future work should also include a re-evaluation and re-modelling of the electromagnetic data in light of the newly proposed geological model (canoe-shaped) to focus on flat-lying or equant conductivity targets that are not necessarily associated with the highly magnetic core of the intrusions. Following this re-evaluation and re-modelling, a significant drill campaign should be undertaken to test these targets as well as extensions to the existing mineralized bodies. Some drill holes have sulphide mineralization hosted within sedimentary rock that was not sampled (e.g. WR-03-18), we recognize that Ni-sulphides are in places injected into argillite. Drill holes should be revisited and sampled where the sulphide provenance is questionable. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 68 26.3 Recommended Program This report outlines two basic scenarios for further exploration of the West Raglan Project. Option one is a limited program focused on acquiring more geophysical data with the objective to discover new sulphide bodies under cover and prepare targets for a future drill program. Option two would fully utilize the two helicopter-portable, LD-250 diamond drills onsite at the Frontier Zone with the intent to 1) expand existing lens footprints and 2) advance one or more targets within the present mineral inventory to a resource category. These proposed project budgets are specific to the work programs and do not include G&A and other annual operating costs. Option One ($2.0M) Property wide detailed helicopter-borne Falcon gravity survey EM modeling: Frontier Zone, Red Zone, Beverly Zone Detailed target mapping and prospecting Frontier Zone, Red Zone, Beverly Zone Option Two ($9.6M) EM modeling: Frontier Zone 12,000 meters of diamond drilling utilizing two helicopter portable drills, helicopter support; o ≈ 2,000m should be used to test extensions to known mineralization (Error! Reference source not found.). o ≈ 7,000m should be planned to test new targets based on a reinterpretation of the geophysical data o ≈ 3,000m should be reserved for follow up of the best results from the above programs. Downhole EM geophysical surveying; Full-time dedicated Twin Otter fixed wing aircraft, and a four-man prospecting team working for the duration of the program. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 69 Table 26-1. Drill hole proposal for follow up on existing drill hole intersections. Does not include new targets. Holes X Y Z Azimuth Dip Length Lenses Description Located West of Discovery lenses in order to validate extensions to Upper PH-14-001 443357 6802760 2329.1 180 -55 100 Discovery Deep and Deep Disco Discovery Located Norh West of Discovery lenses in order to validate extensions to PH-14-002 443371 6802780 2330.95 180 -55 100 Upper & Deep Upper and Deep Disco Located to East of Discovery Upper lens in order to find and validate an PH-14-003 443420 6802750 2322.99 180 -55 50 Discovery Upper extension of the lenses Upper. If hole data return good results the following 2 holes (004 & 005) will be drilled PH-14-004 443442 6802760 2323.28 180 -55 50 Discovery Upper Contingent on a hit in PH-14-003 PH-14-005 443444 6802730 2319.82 180 -55 50 Discovery Upper Contingent on a hit in PH-14-003 Located at the West end of lens 168 in order to validate the potential PH-14-006 443702 6802970 2333.37 180 -50 250 168 extensions. PH-14-007 443717 6802940 2331.88 180 -50 250 168 Contingent on a hit in PH-14-006 PH-14-008 443691 6802940 2333.48 180 -50 250 168 Contingent on a hit in PH-14-006 151 Beta PH-14-009 443884 6803000 2337.63 180 -50 200 Test western extensions to 151 Beta and 151 lenses 151 151 Beta PH-14-010 443856 6803000 2337.27 180 -50 200 Test western extensions to 151 Beta and 151 lenses 151 PH-14-011 443979 6802950 2336.97 180 -50 200 151 Test eastern extensions to 151 Beta and 151 lenses PH-14-012 443890 6802710 2308.23 0 -50 100 130 Teste SW extension to 130 lens. 12N Located East of 12N and West of 12S to validate the potential extension of PH-14-013 444884 6803350 2310.59 180 -45 100 12S both lenses in the area. PH-14-014 444935 6803350 2315.42 180 -45 100 12S Located East of 12S to validate the potential extension 12S in this area TOTAL: 2000 SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 70 27 References Armstrong, T., Puritch, E., Yassa, A., 2009. Technical Report and Resource Estimate on the Puimajuq Ni-Cu-PGE Deposit, Nunavik Nickel Project, Nunavik Québec (Sedar). Armstrong, T., Puritch, E., Yassa, A., 2009. Technical Report and Updated Resource Estimate on the Allammaq Ni-Cu-PGE Deposit, Nunavik Nickel Project, Nunavik Québec (Sedar). Armstrong, T., Puritch, E., Yassa, A., 2007. Technical Report and Updated Resource Estimate on the Mequillon Ni-Cu-PGE Deposit, Nunavik Nickel Project, Nunavik Québec (Sedar). Arne, D. 2012, Review of historical assay data quality from the West Raglan Ni-Cu-PGE project, northern Quebec. CSA Global Report R-TNN-1.2012, Internal report to True North Nickel Inc., December 31, 2012. Baragar, W. R. A. and Scoates, R. F. J., 1987. Volcanic geochemistry of the northern segments of the Circum-Superior Belt of the Canadian Shield. in Geochemistry and mineralization of Proterozoic volcanic suites, Geological Society Special Publications. Eds: Pharaoh, T., Beckinsale, R.D. and Rickard, D.T. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, Boston, USA, 33: 113-131. Barr, J., 2007, Use of CRMs: Recommendations for the 2007 NAE Field Season. Internal memo to Anglo American Exploration Division, June 27, 2007. Beausejour, M., 2011. Avancement des travaux à la mine Kikialik. Katinniapik, V.4 No.1. Demers, P.,. Puritch, E., Coté, M., Lafleur, P.J., Lemieux, R., Dufort, D., Poirier, P., Rivard, S., 2007., Raglan South Nickel Project –Technical Report. (Summary of the Bankable Feasibility Study on Sedar). Desharnais, G. 2005., Geochemical and Isotopic Investigation of Magmatism in the Fox River Belt:Tectonic and Economic Implications. Ph.D., Thesis. Dombrowski, C, Laporte, M-A., Belanger, A-F., and Annell, H. 2011. Annual Report (2010) on the West Raglan Property NTS 35G/05, 35G/06 & 35F/08, VOLUME 1. Anglo American Canada Ltd. 60p. Glencore Annual Report: http://www.glencore.com/assets/Uploads/reports_and_results/glencore/2013/GLEN-2013- Resources-Reserves-Report.pdf Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Mineral Deposits: Nickel Occurrences. http://sigeom.mrn.gouv.qc.ca/signet/classes/I1102_index Lesher, C.M., 2007. Ni-Cu-(PGE) Depsoits in the Raglan Area, Cape Smith Belt, New Québec, in Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, GAC., 351-386. Lightfoot 2007. Advances in Ni-Cu-PGE Sulphide Deposit Models and Implications for Exploration Technologies., In "Proceedings of Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration" edited by B. Milkereit, 2007, p. 629-646. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 71 Mungall, J.E., 2007. Crustal Contamination of Picritic Magmas During Transport Through Dikes: the Expo Intrusive Suite, Cape Smith Fold Belt, New Québec. Journal of Petrology, 48. 1021- 1039. Naldrett, A.J., 2004, Magmatic Sulfide Deposits: Geology, Geochemistry and Exploration, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, 728 p. Nunavik Landholding Corporations Association (NLHCA), 2014. Community Maps: Salluit Category Lands. (http://nlhca.strata360.com/maps/ ) Osmond, R.T., Ravenhurst, W.R., Foley, C.P., Leslie, K.E., 2002. Finding Nickel from the B- Field at Raglan “To B or not DB”. CSEG Recorder, November, Focus Article. Perk, N., Peat, C., Bow, C.S., and Smerchanski, P. 2013. Geological, Geochemical, and Structural Report on the West Raglan Project. Report submitted by Equity Exploration Consultants to True North Nickel. 31p. Roche, 2012. 2011 Water, sediment and soil quality monitoring program; West Raglan Project. Proprietary report submitted to Anglo American (Canada), Ltd. 85p. Welch, M., 2012. http://www.northernlightsottawa.com/presentations/thursday/MikeWelch_201201_NorthernLight s_V1-5.1.pdf Wells, K. W., 2013, 2012 re-survey of historic drill holes: Frontier area. Internal memo to True North Nickel Inc., January 10, 2013. Wells, K. and Smerchanski, P. 2013. Diamond Drilling and Exploration Program on the on the West Raglan Property, Nunavik, Quebec, Canada: True North Nickel Annual Report 2012. 59p. SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 72 Appendix 1 Nickel geochemistry: West Raglan Rock chip nickel results (provided by TNN) SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 73 Till sample results (provided by TNN) SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 74 Appendix 2 Geophysical data for the West Raglan Project Area Total field Spectrem magnetics data (AAEC 2003) SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 75 Colored Tau Z-component Spectrem Electromagnetic conductors (AAEC 2003) SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 76 Merged detailed ground magnetics data from AAEC and TNN programs (provided by TNN) SGS Canada Inc. West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 77 Appendix 3 Geological Cross Section Interpretations SGS Canada Inc. 6803300mN 443100 mE 443200 mE 443300 mE 443400 mE 443500 mE 443600 mE 443700 mE 443800 mE 443900 mE 444000 mE 6803300mN T R - 12 022 025 WR-08-152 TR-12-023 ¾ ¾ W R - 08 162 ¾ ¾ 6803200mN 6803200mN TR-12-031 W R-0 WR-07-135 4-32 ¾ W R - 04 38 ‡‡‡‡ ¾ ¾ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ¾ ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡‡ ¾ ‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ¾ ‡‡‡ ¾ ‡‡‡‡‡‡ ¾ ¾ ¾ WR-03-14 W R - 06 124 ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ WR-03-15 WR-04-21 ‡‡‡ 47 ‡ 8-1 W R - 04 20 ¾ R-0 ¾ W ¾ ¾ ¾ W R - 06 126 6803100mN WR-03-16 6803100mN ¾ W R - 04 78 ¾ W R - 08 150 W R - 04 64 ¾ W R - 05 99 WR-03-03 W R - 04 40 ¾ W R - 06 123 ‡‡ ¾ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡‡ W R - 04 19 W R - 08 173 ¾ TR-12-030 W R - 08 163 -25 WR-08-170 ¾ WR-08-159 04 ¾ 1 R- TR-12-009 TR-12-006TR- W TR-12-027 WR-04-22 12-007 ¾ ¾¾ -08-16 W R - 08 151 WR 6803000mN ¾ 6803000mN ¾ ¾ W R - 08 166 ¾ W R - 05 102 ‡‡‡ ‡‡ ¾ W R - 08 165 169 W R - 06 127 W R - 08 164 TR-12-004TR W R - 08 160 ¾ -12 -001 -002 -12 TR ¾ W R - 07 130 ¾ ¾ WR-07-141 ‡‡ ¾ ¾ W R - 07 145 W R - 07 142 8 -07-12 ¾ ¾ WR W R - 07 132 W R - 07 137 ¾ 7 W R - 06 122 W R - 08 153 W R - 06 125 -08-16 WR-07-140 WR-07-131 6802900mN WR 6802900mN sample text W R - 06 121 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ TR-12-029 ¾ ¾ W R - 06 120 ‡ WR-04-77 ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ W R - 07 136 WR-07-12 W R - 07 129 ¾ ¾ ‡‡‡‡ ‡ 9A ¾ ¾ ‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡ ¾ ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡ W R - 04 24 ‡‡ ‡‡ W R - 04 60 ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ 6802800mN TR-12T-R0-1052-008 6802800mN ‡‡‡‡ ¾ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ WR-04-45 ¾ WR-04-72 ¾ ‡ W R - 06 115 116 ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ¾ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ¾ ¾ ‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡WR-03-04 ‡‡‡ TTRR-1-122-024-019 WR TR-12-021 W R - 06 113 114 ‡ ‡‡‡‡ ¾ -08-14 W R - 04 58 ‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ 8 WR-04-50 ¾ 9 ‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ TR-12-026 ¾ W R - 06 110 111 112 -07-13 ¾ W R - 04 57 ¾ ‡ ‡‡‡‡ ¾ W R - 05 100 W R - 06 108 ¾ W R - 04 70 Plan Map Interpreted Lithology WR ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡WR-03-06 ‡‡‡ ¾ WR-03-05 W R - 04 48 ¾ WR-W0R4-0474-46 ‡‡‡‡‡ TR-12-028 ‡‡‡ ‡‡ Chukotat Basalt ¾ W R - 06 69A ¾¾ T ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ W R - 04 69 ¾ ¾ R-1 W R - 04 54 W R - 06 109 ‡‡‡‡‡16 ‡‡ WR-08-146 W R - 04 74 76 W R - 04 66 67 Povungnituk Basalt ¾¾ 2- ¾ ¾ ¾ 2-0 ¾ 010 ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡‡ W R - 04 71 -1 TR-12-012 WR-04-75 WR-03-11 ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡ WR-03-08 TR WR-03-09 Sediments W R - 04 55 ¾ ¾ ¾ W R - 04 62 W R - 06 118 119 ¾ ‡ ‡‡‡‡‡ WR-04-51 ¾ ‡‡ ¾ ¾ Ultramafic ‡‡‡‡‡ TR-12-003 ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡ ¾ ‡‡‡‡ ¾ WR-03-10 ¾ WR-06-08M ¾ ‡‡‡Outcrop type: Boulders ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ¾ ‡‡‡‡ ¾ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡ W R - 04 73 ‡‡‡ 6802700mN ‡‡ ‡‡ 6802700mN ¾ Downhole Lithology ¾ NR OB W R - 05 97 ‡‡ MMSUL ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ UM ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ EXSUL ‡‡‡‡ ¾ ‡‡‡‡ MAF ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ SEDS ‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ WR-08-148 ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ 6802600mN 6802600mN ¾ WR-07-134 Cross Section Interpreted Lithology ‡ Peridotite, Olivine Pyroxenite ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡ Pyroxenite ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ Basalt ‡‡‡‡‡ Sediment rrr W R - 05 101 ¾ rrrShear Zone rrr ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ¾ WR-07-143 Scale 1 : 1000 West Raglan Project 6802500mN Projection: UTM 18 - NAD83 6802500mN Wireframes Mining District: Raglan contact | layering | magmatic foliation ‡‡ fault | mylonitic foliation Map Sheet: 35F/08 ‡‡ Plan Map EM Plates ‡‡ Prov/State: QC ‡‡‡ Pd ppm 1cm = 1 ppm ‡‡‡ Plot Date: 29-Oct-2013 ‡‡‡ Figure: (cutoff at 2 ppm) ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ 20 0 20 40m 443200 mE 443300 mE 443400 mE 443500 mE 443600 mE 443700 mE 443800 mE 443900 mE 444000 mE 443100 mE 443400mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Wireframes Cross SectionInrpedLholgy Downhole Lithogy Plan MapInterpedLihoogy r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Fr ontier Zone r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ SEDS MAF EXSUL UM MMSUL OB NR Outcrop ype:Boulders Ultramfic Sediments Povungnituk Baslt Chukota Bslt (cutoff a2 ppm) Pd ppm1c=ppm EM Plates fault |myonicolia conta |lyeringmifoli Shear Zone Sediment Baslt Pyroxenite Peridotie, OlivnePyroxente 6802500mN 6802500mN mN 6802500 mN 6802500 ¾ ¾ WR-07143 W R-05101 ¾ ¾ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡ ‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡‡ 6802600mN 6802600mN mN 6802600 mN 6802600 ¾ ¾ 6802700mN 6802700mN WR-03-10 mN 6802700 mN 6802700 W R-0473 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ 08M 08M - - 06 06 - - R R W W ¾ ¾ WR-03-09 WR-03-08 003 003 - - 2 2 1 1 - - R R T T ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ WR-047476 WR-0455 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ WR-03-06 WR-0470 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ TR-12-026 028 028 - - 2 2 1 1 - - R R T T WR-0457 ¾ ¾ WR-03-04 WR-0458 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ 72 72 - - 04 04 - - R R W W ¾ ¾ ¾ 6802800mN 6802800mN ¾ 0m 0 028 8 6 0m 0 028 8 6 N N W R-0424 WR-0460 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ WR-04-77 W R-06120 ¾ ¾ 029 029 - - 2 2 1 1 - - R R T T WR-06125 6802900mN 6802900mN mN 6802900 mN 6802900 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ WR-07142 128 128 - - 7 7 0 0 - - R R W W ¾ ¾ WR-08160 6803000mN 6803000mN 0m 0 030 8 6 0m 0 030 8 6 N N WR-03-03 6803100mN 6803100mN mN 6803100 mN 6803100 ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡ Figure: 443400E Plot Date:17-ec2013 Prov/State: QC Map Sheet:35F/08 Ming Distrct:Raglan Projection: UTM18-NAD83 ‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡ 1 :1000 Scale 6803200mN 6803200mN mN 6803200 mN 6803200 West RaglanProje ct 20 Frontier Zne Sections 2013 Looking 270 +/-12.5 m 20 0 ± 40m 6803300mN 6803300mN mN 6803300 mN 6803300 443400mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m 443500mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Wireframes Cross SectionInrpedLholgy Downhole Lithogy Plan MapInterpedLihoogy r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Fr ontier Zone r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ SEDS MAF EXSUL UM MMSUL OB NR Outcrop ype:Boulders Ultramfic Sediments Povungnituk Baslt Chukota Bslt (cutoff a2 ppm) Pd ppm1c=ppm EM Plates fault |myonicolia conta |lyeringmifoli Shear Zone Sediment Baslt Pyroxenite Peridotie, OlivnePyroxente 6802500mN 6802500mN mN 6802500 mN 6802500 6802600mN 6802600mN mN 6802600 mN 6802600 6802700mN 6802700mN mN 6802700 mN 6802700 ¾ ¾ 138 138 - - 7 7 0 0 - - R R W W 6802800mN 6802800mN 0m 0 028 8 6 0m 0 028 8 6 N N ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ¾ ¾ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ WR-04-77 ‡ ¾ 6802900mN 6802900mN ¾ mN 6802900 mN 6802900 167 167 - - 8 8 0 0 - - R R W W 6803000mN 6803000mN 0m 0 030 8 6 0m 0 030 8 6 N N ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ WR-08173 W R-08170 WR-0440 ¾ ¾ 6803100mN 6803100mN mN 6803100 mN 6803100 Figure: 443500E Plot Date:17-ec2013 Prov/State: QC Map Sheet:35F/08 Ming Distrct:Raglan Projection: UTM18-NAD83 1 :1000 Scale 6803200mN 6803200mN mN 6803200 mN 6803200 West RaglanProje ct 20 Frontier Zne Sections 2013 Looking 270 +/-12.5 m 20 0 ± 40m 6803300mN 6803300mN mN 6803300 mN 6803300 443500mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m 443700mE 443600mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Wireframes Cross SectionInrpedLholgy Downhole Lithogy Plan MapInterpedLihoogy r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Fr ontier Zone r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ SEDS MAF EXSUL UM MMSUL OB NR Outcrop ype:Boulders Ultramfic Sediments Povungnituk Baslt Chukota Bslt (cutoff a2 ppm) Pd ppm1c=ppm EM Plates fault |myonicolia conta |lyeringmifoli Shear Zone Sediment Baslt Pyroxenite Peridotie, OlivnePyroxente 6802500mN 6802500mN mN 6802500 mN 6802500 6802600mN 6802600mN mN 6802600 mN 6802600 6802700mN 6802700mN mN 6802700 mN 6802700 ¾ ¾ WR-0462 51 51 - - 04 04 - - R R W W ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ W R-0454 WR-0471 ¾ ¾ 6802800mN 6802800mN ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ 0m 0 028 8 6 0m 0 028 8 6 N ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡ N ¾ 6802900mN 6802900mN ¾ WR-07137 mN 6802900 mN 6802900 ‡‡ ‡‡ WR-06127 ¾ 6803000mN 6803000mN ¾ 0m 0 030 8 6 0m 0 030 8 6 N N ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ TR-12-030 22 22 - - 4 4 0 0 - - R R W W 027 027 - - 2 2 1 1 - - R R T T 25 25 - - 4 4 0 0 - - R R W W ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ WR-0599 ¾ 6803100mN 6803100mN ¾ mN 6803100 mN 6803100 W R-0420 ¾ ¾ Figure: 443650E Plot Date:17-ec2013 Prov/State: QC Map Sheet:35F/08 Ming Distrct:Raglan Projection: UTM18-NAD83 1 :1000 Scale 6803200mN 6803200mN mN 6803200 mN 6803200 West RaglanProje ct 20 Frontier Zne Sections 2013 Looking 270 +/-12.5 m 20 0 ± 40m 6803300mN 6803300mN mN 6803300 mN 6803300 443700mE 443600mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m 443700mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Wireframes Cross SectionInrpedLholgy Downhole Lithogy Plan MapInterpedLihoogy r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Fr ontier Zone r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ SEDS MAF EXSUL UM MMSUL OB NR Outcrop ype:Boulders Ultramfic Sediments Povungnituk Baslt Chukota Bslt (cutoff a2 ppm) Pd ppm1c=ppm EM Plates fault |myonicolia conta |lyeringmifoli Shear Zone Sediment Baslt Pyroxenite Peridotie, OlivnePyroxente 6802500mN 6802500mN mN 6802500 mN 6802500 6802600mN 6802600mN mN 6802600 mN 6802600 ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡ ‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ 6802700mN 6802700mN mN 6802700 mN ‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡ 6802700 ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡ ‡‡ ‡ 6802800mN 6802800mN ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ 0m 0 028 8 6 0m 0 028 8 6 N ‡ ‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ N ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ 6802900mN 6802900mN mN 6802900 mN 6802900 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ 001 001 - - 2 2 1 1 - - R R T T TR TR-12-004 -12-0 ¾ ¾ ¾ 02 ¾ WR-08164166 WR-06127 ‡‡ ‡‡ ¾ 6803000mN 6803000mN ¾ 0m 0 030 8 6 0m 0 030 8 6 N N ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ TR-12-030 027 027 - - 2 2 1 1 - - R R T T W ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ R-0419 ¾ ¾ WR-06123 ¾ ¾ WR-03-16 WR-08150 6803100mN 6803100mN WR-0478 mN 6803100 mN 6803100 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ WR-0420 WR-06124 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Figure: 443725E Plot Date:17-ec2013 Prov/State: QC Map Sheet:35F/08 Ming Distrct:Raglan Projection: UTM18-NAD83 ¾ ¾ WR-0438 1 :1000 Scale 6803200mN 6803200mN mN 6803200 mN 6803200 West RaglanProje ct 20 Frontier Zne Sections 2013 Looking 270 +/-12.5 m 20 0 ± 40m 6803300mN 6803300mN mN 6803300 mN 6803300 443700mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m 443800mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Wireframes Cross SectionInrpedLholgy Downhole Lithogy Plan MapInterpedLihoogy r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Fr ontier Zone r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ SEDS MAF EXSUL UM MMSUL OB NR Outcrop ype:Boulders Ultramfic Sediments Povungnituk Baslt Chukota Bslt (cutoff a2 ppm) Pd ppm1c=ppm EM Plates fault |myonicolia conta |lyeringmifoli Shear Zone Sediment Baslt Pyroxenite Peridotie, OlivnePyroxente 6802500mN 6802500mN mN 6802500 mN 6802500 6802600mN 6802600mN mN 6802600 mN 6802600 ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡ WR-0597 ¾ ¾ 6802700mN 6802700mN mN 6802700 mN ‡‡‡‡‡ 6802700 ‡‡‡‡ 6802800mN 6802800mN 0m 0 028 8 6 0m 0 028 8 6 N N 6802900mN 6802900mN mN 6802900 mN 6802900 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ WR-08165169 6803000mN 6803000mN 0m 0 030 8 6 0m 0 030 8 6 N N W R-0419 ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡ ¾ ¾ WR-06123 ¾ ¾ WR-0464 WR-03-16 6803100mN 6803100mN WR-0478 mN 6803100 mN 6803100 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ 147 147 - - 8 8 0 0 - - R R W W ¾ WR-03-15 WR-03-14 ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ WR-06124 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ‡‡ ‡ ¾ ¾ ‡‡ ‡‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ¾ ¾ Figure: 443825E Plot Date:17-ec2013 Prov/State: QC Map Sheet:35F/08 Ming Distrct:Raglan Projection: UTM18-NAD83 ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡ 1 :1000 Scale ¾ ¾ TR-12-031 ¾ ¾ WR-07135 6803200mN 6803200mN mN 6803200 mN 6803200 ¾ ¾ WR-08162 West RaglanProje ct ¾ ¾ W R-08152 ¾ ¾ 20 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ TR-12023 TR-12022025 Frontier Zne Sections 2013 Looking 270 +/-12.5 m 20 0 ± 40m 6803300mN 6803300mN mN 6803300 mN 6803300 443800mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m 443900mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Wireframes Cross SectionInrpedLholgy Downhole Lithogy Plan MapInterpedLihoogy r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ Fr ontier Zone r r r ‡ ‡ ‡ SEDS MAF EXSUL UM MMSUL OB NR Outcrop ype:Boulders Ultramfic Sediments Povungnituk Baslt Chukota Bslt (cutoff a2 ppm) Pd ppm1c=ppm EM Plates fault |myonicolia conta |lyeringmifoli Shear Zone Sediment Baslt Pyroxenite Peridotie, OlivnePyroxente 6802500mN 6802500mN mN 6802500 mN 6802500 6802600mN 6802600mN mN 6802600 mN 6802600 WR-08148 ¾ ¾ 6802700mN 6802700mN mN 6802700 mN 6802700 WR-0467 W R-0466 47 47 - - 4 4 0 0 - - R R W W 46 46 - - 4 4 0 0 - - R R W W W ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ R-0448 50 50 - - 04 04 - - R R W W ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ 45 45 - - 04 04 - - R R W W ¾ 6802800mN 6802800mN ¾ 0m 0 028 8 6 0m 0 028 8 6 N N 6802900mN 6802900mN mN 6802900 mN 6802900 WR-07131 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ WR-07130 ¾ ¾ WR-07141 ¾ ¾ WR-08151 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ 6803000mN 6803000mN ¾ TR-12 TR-12-006 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ 0m 0 030 8 6 0m 0 030 8 6 N TR-12-009 N 161 161 - - 8 8 0 0 - - R R W W WR-08159 -007 ¾ ¾ W R-08163 6803100mN 6803100mN mN 6803100 mN 6803100 WR-06126 WR-03-15 WR-03-14 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ‡ ‡ Figure: 443925E Plot Date:17-ec2013 Prov/State: QC Map Sheet:35F/08 Ming Distrct:Raglan Projection: UTM18-NAD83 ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ ‡‡‡ 1 :1000 Scale 6803200mN 6803200mN mN 6803200 mN 6803200 West RaglanProje ct 20 Frontier Zne Sections 2013 Looking 270 +/-12.5 m 20 0 ± 40m 6803300mN 6803300mN mN 6803300 mN 6803300 443900mE 1900m 2000m 2100m 2200m 2300m 2400m West Raglan Technical Report – Northern Quebec, Canada Page 88 Appendix 4 List of Claims SGS Canada Inc. Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1092770 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.49 18667.27 2500 101 CDC1092776 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.48 18765.99 2500 101 CDC1092778 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.48 16370.85 2500 101 CDC1092780 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2018 23:59 41.47 405.6 2500 101 CDC1092781 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2018 23:59 41.47 405.6 2500 101 CDC1092782 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2018 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1092783 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2018 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1092784 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2018 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1092785 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2018 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1092786 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2018 23:59 41.46 405.6 2500 101 CDC1092787 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1092788 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1092789 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1092790 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1092791 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1092792 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1092793 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1092794 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1092795 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1092796 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1092797 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1092798 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1092799 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1092800 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1092801 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1092802 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1092803 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1092805 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1092806 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1092807 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1092808 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1092809 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1092810 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1092811 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1092812 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1092813 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1092814 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1092815 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1092822 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.4 0 2500 101 CDC1092823 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.4 0 2500 101 CDC1092830 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1092831 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1092832 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.37 1731.28 2500 101 CDC1092837 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 10973.1 2500 101 CDC1092838 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 5703.99 2500 101 CDC1092839 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 3532.65 2500 101 CDC1092840 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 3532.65 2500 101 CDC1092841 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 2048.69 2500 101 CDC1092842 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.35 22111.64 2500 101 CDC1092843 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.35 5492.98 2500 101 CDC1092844 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.35 3532.65 2500 101 CDC1092845 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.35 3532.65 2500 101 CDC1092846 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.35 2048.69 2500 101 CDC1092859 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1092860 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.38 124518.4 2500 101 CDC1092861 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1092865 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1092866 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.37 2476.55 2500 101 CDC1092867 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.37 2328.91 2500 101 CDC1092868 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.37 452.85 2500 101 CDC1092869 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.37 2476.55 2500 101 CDC1092870 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1092871 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1092872 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1092873 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1092874 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1092875 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1092876 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1092877 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1092878 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1092879 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1092881 5/28/2002 0:00 5/27/2016 23:59 41.35 0 2500 101 CDC1093555 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.48 405.6 2500 101 CDC1093556 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.48 2516.51 2500 101 CDC1093557 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.48 2516.51 2500 101 CDC1093558 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.48 12221.97 2500 101 CDC1093559 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.47 434.87 2500 101 CDC1093560 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.47 405.6 2500 101 CDC1093561 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1093562 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.47 4176.86 2500 101 CDC1093563 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.47 9792.76 2500 101 CDC1093564 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.47 3370.58 2500 101 CDC1093565 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.47 3370.58 2500 101 CDC1093566 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.47 405.6 2500 101 CDC1093567 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.47 405.6 2500 101 CDC1093568 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.47 405.6 2500 101 CDC1093569 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.47 405.6 2500 101 CDC1093570 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1093571 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1093572 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.46 197.84 2500 101 CDC1093573 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.46 2911.39 2500 101 CDC1093574 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.46 139193.34 2500 101 CDC1093575 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1093576 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1093577 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1093578 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1093579 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1093580 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1093581 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093582 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093583 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093584 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093585 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093586 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093587 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093588 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093589 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093590 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2018 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093591 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093592 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093593 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093595 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093596 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093597 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093598 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093599 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093600 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093601 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093602 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093603 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093607 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1093608 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1093609 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1093610 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1093611 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.43 1260.99 2500 101 CDC1093612 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.43 1260.99 2500 101 CDC1093613 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.43 360.99 2500 101 CDC1093614 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.43 1260.99 2500 101 CDC1093615 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1093619 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1093620 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1093621 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1093622 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1093623 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.42 1260.99 2500 101 CDC1093624 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2014 23:59 41.42 1260.99 1800 202 CDC1093625 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.42 360.99 2500 101 CDC1093626 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.42 825.96 2500 101 CDC1093628 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.41 4016.34 2500 101 CDC1093629 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.41 3461.36 2500 101 CDC1093640 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.4 3594.46 2500 101 CDC1093641 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.4 6737.22 2500 101 CDC1093642 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.4 3636.9 2500 101 CDC1093643 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.4 8436.89 2500 101 CDC1093644 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.4 7337.48 2500 101 CDC1093645 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.4 8436.89 2500 101 CDC1093646 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.4 22925.28 2500 101 CDC1093647 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.4 17729.78 2500 101 CDC1093652 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 1162.84 2500 101 CDC1093653 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 7337.48 2500 101 CDC1093654 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 3636.89 2500 101 CDC1093655 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 8436.89 2500 101 CDC1093656 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 8436.89 2500 101 CDC1093657 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 22925.28 2500 101 CDC1093658 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 27830.74 2500 101 CDC1093659 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 27836.14 2500 101 CDC1093660 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 27099.45 2500 101 CDC1093661 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 27099.44 2500 101 CDC1093662 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 27099.44 2500 101 CDC1093663 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 12611.05 2500 101 CDC1093664 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 12611.05 2500 101 CDC1093673 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.38 2905.6 2500 101 CDC1093674 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.38 2905.6 2500 101 CDC1093675 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 2905.6 2500 101 CDC1093676 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 2905.6 2500 101 CDC1093677 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 27099.44 2500 101 CDC1093678 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 27099.44 2500 101 CDC1093679 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 27099.44 2500 101 CDC1093680 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 12611.05 2500 101 CDC1093681 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 12611.05 2500 101 CDC1093686 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 12611.05 2500 101 CDC1093687 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 12611.05 2500 101 CDC1093688 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 12611.05 2500 101 CDC1093689 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 12611.05 2500 101 CDC1093702 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 74.58 2500 101 CDC1093703 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 153.37 2500 101 CDC1093704 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2014 23:59 41.44 0 1800 202 CDC1093705 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 141.48 2500 101 CDC1093706 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2014 23:59 41.44 0 1800 202 CDC1093708 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1093724 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.42 721.98 2500 101 CDC1093730 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.42 1260.99 2500 101 CDC1093735 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1093749 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 0 2500 101 CDC1093750 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.39 0 2500 101 CDC1093755 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1093756 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1093757 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1093758 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.38 21876.65 2500 101 CDC1093759 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.38 26690.04 2500 101 CDC1093760 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.38 109079.29 2500 101 CDC1093761 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.38 23758.82 2500 101 CDC1093762 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1093763 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1093764 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1093765 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1093766 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1093767 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1093768 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 11088.39 2500 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1093769 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 11961.54 2500 101 CDC1093770 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 16761.54 2500 101 CDC1093771 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.37 16761.54 2500 101 CDC1093772 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1093773 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1093774 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1093775 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1093776 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1093777 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1093778 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1093779 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1093780 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1093781 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1093782 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.35 85583.69 2500 101 CDC1093783 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.35 4746.09 2500 101 CDC1093784 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.35 16945.29 2500 101 CDC1093785 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.35 16945.29 2500 101 CDC1093786 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.35 15845.88 2500 101 CDC1093787 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.35 13125.31 2500 101 CDC1093788 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.35 23385.17 2500 101 CDC1093789 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.35 24484.58 2500 101 CDC1093790 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.35 23561.84 2500 101 CDC1093791 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.35 26655.92 2500 101 CDC1093792 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.34 212153.46 2500 101 CDC1093793 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.34 22276.05 2500 101 CDC1093794 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.34 16945.29 2500 101 CDC1093795 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.34 16945.29 2500 101 CDC1093796 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.34 9814.9 2500 101 CDC1093797 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.34 10819.71 2500 101 CDC1093798 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.34 25556.51 2500 101 CDC1093799 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.34 158833.24 2500 101 CDC1093800 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.34 323893.05 2500 101 CDC1093801 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.34 81958.48 2500 101 CDC1093802 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.48 750.94 2500 101 CDC1093804 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1093810 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1093817 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093818 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093819 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093820 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 1901.01 2500 101 CDC1093821 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 301.01 2500 101 CDC1093822 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 926.49 2500 101 CDC1093823 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093824 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 9032.42 2500 101 CDC1093825 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1093827 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.45 1368.73 2500 101 CDC1093834 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.33 4778.7 2500 101 CDC1093870 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.33 0 2500 101 CDC1093871 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.33 0 2500 101 CDC1093872 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.33 0 2500 101 CDC1093873 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.33 0 2500 101 CDC1093876 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1093884 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1093885 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1093886 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1093887 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1093888 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1093889 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1093898 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1093899 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1093900 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1093901 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1093902 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1093903 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1093904 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093905 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1093906 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2014 23:59 41.29 0 1800 202 CDC1093907 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093908 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093909 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093910 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093911 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093912 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093913 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093914 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093915 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093916 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093917 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1093920 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1093921 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1093922 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1093923 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1093924 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2014 23:59 41.28 29.18 1800 202 CDC1093925 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1093929 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1093930 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1093931 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1093932 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.27 0 2500 101 CDC1093933 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.27 0 2500 101 CDC1093946 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.26 0 2500 101 CDC1093947 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.26 0 2500 101 CDC1093948 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.26 0 2500 101 CDC1093949 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.26 0 2500 101 CDC1093950 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.26 0 2500 101 CDC1093951 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.26 0 2500 101 CDC1093958 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.26 0 2500 101 CDC1093960 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.26 0 2500 101 CDC1093961 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.25 924.23 2500 101 CDC1093962 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.25 0 2500 101 CDC1093963 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.25 0 2500 101 CDC1093971 6/19/2002 0:00 6/18/2016 23:59 41.25 0 2500 101 CDC1094008 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.49 17719.01 2500 101 CDC1094009 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.48 1081.65 2500 101 CDC1094010 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.48 2516.51 2500 101 CDC1094011 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.48 2516.51 2500 101 CDC1094012 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.48 9045.66 2500 101 CDC1094013 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.48 2516.51 2500 101 CDC1094014 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.48 4399.57 2500 101 CDC1094015 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.48 418.81 2500 101 CDC1094016 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.48 4399.57 2500 101 CDC1094017 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.48 18887.96 2500 101 CDC1094020 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.47 3370.58 2500 101 CDC1094021 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.47 3370.58 2500 101 CDC1094022 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.47 3370.58 2500 101 CDC1094023 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.47 3370.58 2500 101 CDC1094024 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.47 3370.58 2500 101 CDC1094025 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.47 4278.1 2500 101 CDC1094026 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.47 4278.1 2500 101 CDC1094027 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.47 4278.1 2500 101 CDC1094028 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.47 1313.12 2500 101 CDC1094029 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.47 1313.12 2500 101 CDC1094030 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.47 1313.12 2500 101 CDC1094031 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.46 3367.28 2500 101 CDC1094032 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.46 3370.58 2500 101 CDC1094033 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.46 3370.58 2500 101 CDC1094034 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.46 3370.58 2500 101 CDC1094035 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.46 3370.57 2500 101 CDC1094036 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1094037 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.46 1799.84 2500 101 CDC1094038 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.46 3399.84 2500 101 CDC1094039 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.46 434.87 2500 101 CDC1094040 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.46 434.87 2500 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1094041 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2018 23:59 41.46 434.87 2500 101 CDC1094042 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.45 2905.6 2500 101 CDC1094043 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.45 2905.6 2500 101 CDC1094044 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.45 2294.27 2500 101 CDC1094045 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.45 5894.27 2500 101 CDC1094046 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.45 2929.3 2500 101 CDC1094047 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.45 1105.6 2500 101 CDC1094048 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.45 2905.59 2500 101 CDC1094049 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.45 2905.59 2500 101 CDC1094050 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.45 1105.59 2500 101 CDC1094051 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.45 880.43 2500 101 CDC1094052 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.45 2156.43 2500 101 CDC1094053 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1094054 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1094064 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2014 23:59 41.43 0 1800 202 CDC1094065 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2014 23:59 41.43 0 1800 202 CDC1094066 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2014 23:59 41.43 0 1800 202 CDC1094067 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.43 1878.2 2500 101 CDC1094068 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.43 1878.2 2500 101 CDC1094069 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.43 1878.2 2500 101 CDC1094070 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2014 23:59 41.43 0 1800 202 CDC1094071 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2014 23:59 41.43 0 1800 202 CDC1094072 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2014 23:59 41.43 0 1800 202 CDC1094073 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2014 23:59 41.43 0 1800 202 CDC1094077 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1094078 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 2249.54 2500 101 CDC1094079 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 1878.2 2500 101 CDC1094080 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 78.2 2500 101 CDC1094081 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1094082 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1094083 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1094084 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1094085 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1094091 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1094092 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1094093 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1094094 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1094095 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1094098 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.4 2905.59 2500 101 CDC1094099 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.4 2905.59 2500 101 CDC1094100 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.4 2905.59 2500 101 CDC1094101 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.4 0 2500 101 CDC1094102 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.4 0 2500 101 CDC1094103 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.4 0 2500 101 CDC1094104 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.4 0 2500 101 CDC1094105 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.4 0 2500 101 CDC1094106 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.4 6165.36 2500 101 CDC1094107 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.4 5722.87 2500 101 CDC1094108 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 17189.63 2500 101 CDC1094109 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 17008.8 2500 101 CDC1094110 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 19399.87 2500 101 CDC1094111 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 11214.7 2500 101 CDC1094112 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 10850.91 2500 101 CDC1094113 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 5408.13 2500 101 CDC1094114 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 1095.31 2500 101 CDC1094115 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 0 2500 101 CDC1094116 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 0 2500 101 CDC1094117 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 0 2500 101 CDC1094118 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 31571.75 2500 101 CDC1094119 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 610951.29 2500 101 CDC1094120 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 7173136.82 2500 101 CDC1094121 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 5529208.14 2500 101 CDC1094122 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 2973702.42 2500 101 CDC1094123 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 168658.87 2500 101 CDC1094124 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 28553.93 2500 101 CDC1094125 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 3980.4 2500 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1094126 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 8975.31 2500 101 CDC1094127 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 25811.19 2500 101 CDC1094128 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 23349.9 2500 101 CDC1094129 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 53044.28 2500 101 CDC1094130 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 104800.96 2500 101 CDC1094131 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 866877.46 2500 101 CDC1094132 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 373598.2 2500 101 CDC1094133 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 846874.66 2500 101 CDC1094134 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 1235025.68 2500 101 CDC1094135 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 263859.83 2500 101 CDC1094136 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 251973.41 2500 101 CDC1094137 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 45716.39 2500 101 CDC1094145 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 22094.25 2500 101 CDC1094146 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 83489.7 2500 101 CDC1094147 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 81355.85 2500 101 CDC1094156 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 1260.97 2500 101 CDC1094157 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 1260.97 2500 101 CDC1094158 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1094159 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 1260.97 2500 101 CDC1094160 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 1260.97 2500 101 CDC1094161 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 1260.97 2500 101 CDC1094162 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 1260.97 2500 101 CDC1094163 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1094164 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1094175 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1094176 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1094177 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.41 1260.97 2500 101 CDC1094178 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 6693.63 2500 101 CDC1094179 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 7488.39 2500 101 CDC1094188 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.39 499.01 2500 101 CDC1094190 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.38 23758.81 2500 101 CDC1094191 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.38 14053.36 2500 101 CDC1094193 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1094194 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1094195 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1094196 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1094197 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1094202 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 13161.54 2500 101 CDC1094203 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 14137.08 2500 101 CDC1094204 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.37 11088.39 2500 101 CDC1094215 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 619.1 2500 101 CDC1094216 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 6619.1 2500 101 CDC1094217 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1094218 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1094222 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1094223 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1094224 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1094225 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.36 491.67 2500 101 CDC1094228 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 13929.43 2500 101 CDC1094229 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 15028.91 2500 101 CDC1094230 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 13929.5 2500 101 CDC1094231 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 16053.37 2500 101 CDC1094232 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 17125.3 2500 101 CDC1094233 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 26095.13 2500 101 CDC1094234 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 84869.34 2500 101 CDC1094235 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 237752.45 2500 101 CDC1094236 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 347699.44 2500 101 CDC1094237 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 289466.13 2500 101 CDC1094238 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 11680.59 2500 101 CDC1094239 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.35 10568.31 2500 101 CDC1094241 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 17125.3 2500 101 CDC1094242 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 16100.84 2500 101 CDC1094243 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 16100.84 2500 101 CDC1094244 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 212869.13 2500 101 CDC1094245 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 56671.21 2500 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1094246 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 25634.68 2500 101 CDC1094247 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 28195.72 2500 101 CDC1094248 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 8463.71 2500 101 CDC1094249 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 19306.62 2500 101 CDC1094250 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 24891.05 2500 101 CDC1094251 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 11371.69 2500 101 CDC1094252 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.34 18362.05 2500 101 CDC1094257 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.33 6619.1 2500 101 CDC1094258 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.33 14953.96 2500 101 CDC1094259 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.33 13278.61 2500 101 CDC1094260 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.33 8643.25 2500 101 CDC1094261 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.33 12659.6 2500 101 CDC1094262 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.33 4305.49 2500 101 CDC1094263 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.33 9906.32 2500 101 CDC1094264 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.33 9906.32 2500 101 CDC1094265 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.33 7919.28 2500 101 CDC1094270 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1094271 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1094272 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.44 3870.42 2500 101 CDC1094273 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1094283 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.32 171.18 2500 101 CDC1094284 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.32 171.18 2500 101 CDC1094285 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.32 2194.88 2500 101 CDC1094289 6/5/2002 0:00 6/4/2016 23:59 41.31 171.18 2500 101 CDC1094304 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.48 21206.97 2500 101 CDC1094308 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2018 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1094309 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2018 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1094310 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2018 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1094311 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2018 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1094312 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2018 23:59 41.47 10735.96 2500 101 CDC1094313 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.47 11212.26 2500 101 CDC1094314 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.47 11088.39 2500 101 CDC1094317 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1094318 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.46 0 1800 202 CDC1094319 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.46 0 1800 202 CDC1094320 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.46 0 1800 202 CDC1094321 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1094322 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1094323 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1094324 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1094325 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.46 472.49 2500 101 CDC1094326 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1094327 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1094331 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.45 4661.38 2500 101 CDC1094332 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.45 6019.98 2500 101 CDC1094333 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1094334 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.45 472.49 2500 101 CDC1094337 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1094338 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1094344 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1094353 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.42 6267.93 2500 101 CDC1094354 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.42 5964.75 2500 101 CDC1094355 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.42 0 2500 101 CDC1094365 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.41 0 1800 202 CDC1094366 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1094367 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.41 0 1800 202 CDC1094368 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1094369 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1094372 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.4 0 2500 101 CDC1094374 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.4 0 1800 202 CDC1094375 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.4 0 1800 202 CDC1094376 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.4 0 1800 202 CDC1094381 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1094387 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1094388 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.38 0 1800 202 CDC1094389 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.38 0 1800 202 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1094390 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.38 0 2500 101 CDC1094396 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1094399 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1094400 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1094401 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1094402 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1094403 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1094404 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1094406 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.36 2779.98 2500 101 CDC1094407 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.36 7680.56 2500 101 CDC1094408 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.36 7680.56 2500 101 CDC1094409 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.36 2048.69 2500 101 CDC1094410 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.36 2109.44 2500 101 CDC1094411 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1094412 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.36 1535.14 2500 101 CDC1094413 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.36 5135.14 2500 101 CDC1094414 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1094415 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.36 6619.1 2500 101 CDC1094416 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 9804.43 2500 101 CDC1094417 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 71136.08 2500 101 CDC1094418 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 156982.1 2500 101 CDC1094419 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 111039.24 2500 101 CDC1094420 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 116062.97 2500 101 CDC1094421 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 27650.37 2500 101 CDC1094422 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 25893.51 2500 101 CDC1094423 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 17477.6 2500 101 CDC1094424 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 98260.21 2500 101 CDC1094425 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 241938.09 2500 101 CDC1094434 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.34 13630.44 2500 101 CDC1094435 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.34 13818.78 2500 101 CDC1094683 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.48 0 2500 101 CDC1094684 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.48 0 2500 101 CDC1094685 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.48 0 2500 101 CDC1094699 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1094700 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.47 0 2500 101 CDC1094701 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.47 2905.59 2500 101 CDC1094702 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2018 23:59 41.47 434.86 2500 101 CDC1094703 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2018 23:59 41.47 434.86 2500 101 CDC1094704 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2018 23:59 41.47 434.86 2500 101 CDC1094718 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1094719 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1094720 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1094721 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1094722 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2018 23:59 41.46 0 2500 101 CDC1094733 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1094734 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1094735 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1094736 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1094737 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.45 0 2500 101 CDC1094748 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1094749 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1094750 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.44 0 2500 101 CDC1094755 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1094756 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1094757 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1094758 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1094759 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.43 0 2500 101 CDC1094764 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.42 16614.57 2500 101 CDC1094765 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.42 19168.61 2500 101 CDC1094766 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.42 3096.08 2500 101 CDC1094767 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.42 8436.87 2500 101 CDC1094768 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.42 3119.93 2500 101 CDC1094769 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.42 4993.31 2500 101 CDC1094770 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.42 10319.93 2500 101 CDC1094777 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 20848.61 2500 101 CDC1094778 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 20854.09 2500 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1094779 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 337350.67 2500 101 CDC1094780 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 161099.31 2500 101 CDC1094781 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 338617.1 2500 101 CDC1094782 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 8436.87 2500 101 CDC1094783 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 19325.26 2500 101 CDC1094784 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 22925.26 2500 101 CDC1094785 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 148932.35 2500 101 CDC1094786 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 10533.26 2500 101 CDC1094787 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 11632.67 2500 101 CDC1094788 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 194907.66 2500 101 CDC1094789 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.41 208529.72 2500 101 CDC1094797 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.4 17393.98 2500 101 CDC1094798 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.4 17393.98 2500 101 CDC1094799 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.4 17393.98 2500 101 CDC1094800 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.4 278559.96 2500 101 CDC1094801 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.4 3477.83 2500 101 CDC1094802 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.4 5360.89 2500 101 CDC1094803 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.4 5360.89 2500 101 CDC1094813 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.39 2905.59 2500 101 CDC1094814 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.39 2905.59 2500 101 CDC1094815 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.39 7337.46 2500 101 CDC1094816 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.39 7337.46 2500 101 CDC1094817 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.39 7337.46 2500 101 CDC1095506 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 0 2500 101 CDC1095507 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 0 2500 101 CDC1095508 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.35 0 2500 101 CDC1095509 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.34 0 2500 101 CDC1095510 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.34 0 2500 101 CDC1095511 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.34 0 2500 101 CDC1095512 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.34 0 2500 101 CDC1095513 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.34 0 2500 101 CDC1095514 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.34 0 2500 101 CDC1095523 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1095524 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1095525 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1095526 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1095527 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1095528 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1095529 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.33 0 2500 101 CDC1095530 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1095531 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1095532 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1095533 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.33 0 2500 101 CDC1095534 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1095535 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1095537 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1095538 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1095539 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1095540 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1095541 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1095542 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1095545 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.32 0 1800 202 CDC1095546 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.32 0 1800 202 CDC1095547 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.32 0 1800 202 CDC1095548 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.32 0 1800 202 CDC1095549 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.32 0 1800 202 CDC1095550 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.32 0 1800 202 CDC1095551 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 3477.83 2500 101 CDC1095552 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 3477.83 2500 101 CDC1095553 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1095554 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1095555 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1095556 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1095557 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1095558 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1095559 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1095561 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1095562 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1095563 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1095564 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1095571 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.3 325.22 2500 101 CDC1095572 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.3 1129.05 2500 101 CDC1095573 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1095575 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.3 0 2500 101 CDC1095576 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1095578 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.29 0 2500 101 CDC1095579 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.28 6582.36 2500 101 CDC1095580 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.28 5482.95 2500 101 CDC1095581 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1095582 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1095583 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.28 6470.09 2500 101 CDC1095586 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.28 783.64 1800 202 CDC1095587 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1095588 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1095589 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.28 0 2500 101 CDC1095593 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 10383.86 2500 101 CDC1095594 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 18215.3 2500 101 CDC1095595 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 4914.15 2500 101 CDC1095596 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 15039.15 2500 101 CDC1095597 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 5482.94 2500 101 CDC1095598 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 12131.63 2500 101 CDC1095599 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 0 2500 101 CDC1095600 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 0 2500 101 CDC1095601 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 94.59 2500 101 CDC1095602 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 859.35 2500 101 CDC1095603 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.27 0 1800 202 CDC1095604 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2014 23:59 41.27 0 1800 202 CDC1095605 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 0 2500 101 CDC1095606 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.27 0 2500 101 CDC1095607 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 16332.24 2500 101 CDC1095608 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 18215.3 2500 101 CDC1095609 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 63137.42 2500 101 CDC1095610 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 21879.76 2500 101 CDC1095611 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 15327.43 2500 101 CDC1095612 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 14928.33 2500 101 CDC1095613 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 15327.43 2500 101 CDC1095614 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 11227.73 2500 101 CDC1095615 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 2420.26 2500 101 CDC1095616 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 11224.14 2500 101 CDC1095617 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 11224.14 2500 101 CDC1095618 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 0 2500 101 CDC1095619 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.26 0 2500 101 CDC1095622 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.25 7125.12 2500 101 CDC1095623 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.25 7657.67 2500 101 CDC1095624 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.25 13378.51 2500 101 CDC1095625 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.25 13112.78 2500 101 CDC1095626 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.25 13527.43 2500 101 CDC1095627 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.25 16426.84 2500 101 CDC1095628 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.25 18.55 2500 101 CDC1095629 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.25 7654.28 2500 101 CDC1095630 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.25 7654.28 2500 101 CDC1095631 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.25 0 2500 101 CDC1095632 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.25 2489.48 2500 101 CDC1095649 6/6/2002 0:00 6/5/2016 23:59 41.23 1415.58 2500 101 CDC1095716 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1095717 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.41 0 2500 101 CDC1095725 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.39 0 2500 101 CDC1095726 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.39 0 2500 101 CDC1095727 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.39 0 1800 202 CDC1095728 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.39 0 1800 202 CDC1095729 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.39 0 1800 202 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1095730 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.39 0 1800 202 CDC1095765 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.36 0 1800 202 CDC1095766 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.36 0 1800 202 CDC1095775 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.35 0 2500 101 CDC1095776 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.35 0 1800 202 CDC1095777 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.35 0 1800 202 CDC1095778 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.35 0 1800 202 CDC1095779 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.35 0 2500 101 CDC1095780 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.35 0 1800 202 CDC1095781 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.35 0 1800 202 CDC1095782 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.35 0 1800 202 CDC1095787 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.34 0 2500 101 CDC1095791 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1095792 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1095793 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1095794 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.33 2851.33 2500 101 CDC1095795 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.33 0 2500 101 CDC1095796 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.33 0 2500 101 CDC1095797 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.33 296.48 2500 101 CDC1095798 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.33 1335.38 2500 101 CDC1095805 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1095806 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 497.2 2500 101 CDC1095807 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 6596.78 2500 101 CDC1095808 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 7380.43 2500 101 CDC1095809 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 7380.43 2500 101 CDC1095810 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 3173.89 2500 101 CDC1095811 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 3173.89 2500 101 CDC1095815 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1095816 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 171.18 2500 101 CDC1095817 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 6718.25 2500 101 CDC1095818 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 2417.11 2500 101 CDC1095819 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 10948.86 2500 101 CDC1095820 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 9944.05 2500 101 CDC1095821 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 9944.05 2500 101 CDC1095822 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 9944.05 2500 101 CDC1095823 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 9698.63 2500 101 CDC1095824 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 9944.05 2500 101 CDC1095825 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 6979.41 2500 101 CDC1095826 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 0 2500 101 CDC1095828 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 5618.84 2500 101 CDC1095829 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 2417.11 2500 101 CDC1095830 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 11973.32 2500 101 CDC1095831 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 89500.07 2500 101 CDC1095832 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 32451.61 2500 101 CDC1095833 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 240220.87 2500 101 CDC1095834 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 44902.24 2500 101 CDC1095835 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 43357.88 2500 101 CDC1095836 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 29972.17 2500 101 CDC1095837 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 153231.04 2500 101 CDC1095845 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 18304.45 2500 101 CDC1095846 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 33555.51 2500 101 CDC1095847 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 29034.97 2500 101 CDC1095848 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 41657.39 2500 101 CDC1095855 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 10068.72 2500 101 CDC1095856 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 10369.66 2500 101 CDC1095857 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 12142.17 2500 101 CDC1096666 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1096667 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1096668 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1096669 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1096670 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1096671 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1096672 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1096673 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.37 0 2500 101 CDC1096678 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1096679 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1096680 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1096681 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1096682 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1096683 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1096684 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.36 0 2500 101 CDC1096696 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1096697 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1096698 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1096699 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.34 0 2500 101 CDC1096700 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.34 0 2500 101 CDC1096701 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1096702 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1096703 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1096704 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1096705 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1096706 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.34 0 1800 202 CDC1096709 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1096710 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1096711 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1096712 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1096713 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1096714 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1096715 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1096716 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1096717 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.33 0 1800 202 CDC1096718 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 1539.49 2500 101 CDC1096719 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 0 2500 101 CDC1096720 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 2115.03 2500 101 CDC1096721 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 3119.83 2500 101 CDC1096722 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 11668.68 2500 101 CDC1096723 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 21441.15 2500 101 CDC1096724 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 3031.36 2500 101 CDC1096725 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 15675.87 2500 101 CDC1096726 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 20760.26 2500 101 CDC1096727 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.32 15260.66 2500 101 CDC1096730 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 7230.73 2500 101 CDC1096731 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 3044.88 2500 101 CDC1096732 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 1015.61 2500 101 CDC1096733 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 10412.81 2500 101 CDC1096734 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 31798.38 2500 101 CDC1096735 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 107427.9 2500 101 CDC1096736 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 28036.1 2500 101 CDC1096737 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 20933.65 2500 101 CDC1096738 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 30022.04 2500 101 CDC1096739 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 32522.63 2500 101 CDC1096740 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 32522.63 2500 101 CDC1096741 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.31 712.46 2500 101 CDC1096742 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 22434.77 2500 101 CDC1096743 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 20658.55 2500 101 CDC1096744 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 13285.43 2500 101 CDC1096745 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 13578.64 2500 101 CDC1096746 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 20547.24 2500 101 CDC1096747 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 14198.16 2500 101 CDC1096748 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.3 18243.86 1800 202 CDC1096749 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.3 12854.2 1800 202 CDC1096750 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2014 23:59 41.3 7995.53 1800 202 CDC1096751 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 5030.56 2500 101 CDC1096752 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 5030.56 2500 101 CDC1096753 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.3 3770.53 2500 101 CDC1096754 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 132448.79 2500 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC1096755 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 90208.75 2500 101 CDC1096756 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 31068.75 2500 101 CDC1096757 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 32777.76 2500 101 CDC1096758 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 30786.2 2500 101 CDC1096759 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 8316.16 2500 101 CDC1096760 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 7443.27 2500 101 CDC1096761 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 10408.24 2500 101 CDC1096762 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 11413.04 2500 101 CDC1096763 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 7443.26 2500 101 CDC1096764 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 7443.26 2500 101 CDC1096765 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.28 5482.93 2500 101 CDC1096766 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 12904.75 2500 101 CDC1096767 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 21024.03 2500 101 CDC1096768 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 21315.03 2500 101 CDC1096769 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 36714.44 2500 101 CDC1096770 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 171310.98 2500 101 CDC1096771 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 49169.4 2500 101 CDC1096772 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 40037.39 2500 101 CDC1096773 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 23950.93 2500 101 CDC1096774 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 20116.47 2500 101 CDC1096775 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 10876.19 2500 101 CDC1096776 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 9547.47 2500 101 CDC1096777 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.27 15751.35 2500 101 CDC1096782 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.26 2887.44 2500 101 CDC1096783 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.26 8460.08 2500 101 CDC1096784 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.26 20365.58 2500 101 CDC1096785 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.26 10402.54 2500 101 CDC1096786 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.26 11725.42 2500 101 CDC1096787 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.26 8923.95 2500 101 CDC1096788 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.26 10619.4 2500 101 CDC1096789 6/18/2002 0:00 6/17/2016 23:59 41.26 9683.52 2500 101 CDC2358058 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 39.61 0 120 202 CDC2358059 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.49 0 120 202 CDC2358060 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.49 0 120 202 CDC2358061 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.49 0 120 202 CDC2358062 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.49 0 120 202 CDC2358063 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.49 0 120 202 CDC2358064 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.48 0 120 202 CDC2358065 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.48 0 120 202 CDC2358066 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.48 0 120 202 CDC2358067 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.48 0 120 202 CDC2358068 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.48 0 120 202 CDC2358069 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.48 0 120 202 CDC2358070 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.48 0 120 202 CDC2358071 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 37.87 0 120 202 CDC2358072 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.46 0 120 202 CDC2358073 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.46 0 120 202 CDC2358074 7/25/2012 0:00 7/24/2014 23:59 41.46 0 120 202 CDC2359773 7/31/2012 0:00 7/30/2016 23:59 41.26 0 400 101 CDC2359774 7/31/2012 0:00 7/30/2016 23:59 41.25 0 400 101 CDC2359775 7/31/2012 0:00 7/30/2016 23:59 41.25 0 400 101 CDC2359776 7/31/2012 0:00 7/30/2016 23:59 41.25 0 400 101 CDC2359777 7/31/2012 0:00 7/30/2016 23:59 41.25 0 400 101 CDC2359778 7/31/2012 0:00 7/30/2016 23:59 41.24 0 400 101 CDC2359779 7/31/2012 0:00 7/30/2016 23:59 41.24 0 400 101 CDC2359780 7/31/2012 0:00 7/30/2016 23:59 41.24 0 400 101 CDC2359781 7/31/2012 0:00 7/30/2016 23:59 41.24 0 400 101 CDC2382300 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.32 0 120 101 CDC2382301 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.32 0 120 101 CDC2382302 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.32 0 120 101 CDC2382303 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.32 0 120 101 CDC2382304 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.32 0 120 101 CDC2382305 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.32 0 120 101 Excess Work Title Date of Registration Expiry Date Area (Ha) (CAD$) Required Work Required Fees CDC2382306 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.32 0 120 101 CDC2382307 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.31 0 120 101 CDC2382308 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.31 0 120 101 CDC2382309 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.31 0 120 101 CDC2382310 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.31 0 120 101 CDC2382311 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.31 0 120 101 CDC2382312 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.31 0 120 101 CDC2382313 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.31 0 120 101 CDC2382314 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.29 0 120 101 CDC2382315 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.29 0 120 101 CDC2382316 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.29 0 120 101 CDC2382317 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.29 0 120 101 CDC2382318 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.29 0 120 101 CDC2382319 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.29 0 120 101 CDC2382320 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.29 0 120 101 CDC2382321 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.28 0 120 101 CDC2382322 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.28 0 120 101 CDC2382323 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.28 0 120 101 CDC2382324 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.28 0 120 101 CDC2382325 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.28 0 120 101 CDC2382326 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.28 0 120 101 CDC2382327 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.28 0 120 101 CDC2382328 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.27 0 120 101 CDC2382329 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.27 0 120 101 CDC2382330 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.27 0 120 101 CDC2382331 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.27 0 120 101 CDC2382332 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.27 0 120 101 CDC2382333 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.27 0 120 101 CDC2382334 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.27 0 120 101 CDC2382335 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.26 0 120 101 CDC2382336 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.26 0 120 101 CDC2382337 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.26 0 120 101 CDC2382338 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.26 0 120 101 CDC2382339 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.26 0 120 101 CDC2382340 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.26 0 120 101 CDC2382341 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.26 0 120 101 CDC2382342 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.25 0 120 101 CDC2382343 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.25 0 120 101 CDC2382344 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.25 0 120 101 CDC2382345 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.25 0 120 101 CDC2382346 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.25 0 120 101 CDC2382347 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.25 0 120 101 CDC2382348 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.25 0 120 101 CDC2382349 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.24 0 120 101 CDC2382350 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.24 0 120 101 CDC2382351 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.24 0 120 101 CDC2382352 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.24 0 120 101 CDC2382353 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.24 0 120 101 CDC2382354 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.24 0 120 101 CDC2382355 3/13/2013 0:00 3/12/2015 23:59 41.24 0 120 101