Filiberto Cortez, Bureau of Reclamation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Filiberto Cortez, Bureau of Reclamation Lower Rio Grande Project Operating Agreement: Settlement of Litigation SURFACE WATER OPPORTUNITIES IN NEW MEXICO 2008 OCTOBER NEW MEXICO WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE Filiberto (Bert) Cortez, a native of El Paso, Texas, attended Bel Air High school and served in the U.S. Air Force during the Vietnam War era. While completing a B.S. in civil engineering at the University of Texas at El Paso, he began working for the Rio Grande Project, Bureau of Reclamation, and upon graduation worked as a staff engineer with the Project. Over the course of his career he has held various positions in the El Paso office, which include design engineer, hydraulic engineer, safety engineer, information resources coordinator, and planning engineer. Bert is now the manager of the El Paso office, which manages the water supplies for the Rio Grande Project. He is the principal Reclamation representative in various negotiations on water operations procedures, water rights adjudications, negotiation conversions of irrigation water to municipal and industrial water use, and resolution of environmental issues. Lower Rio Grande Project Operating Agreement: Settlement of Litigation Filiberto Cortez Bureau of Reclamation 10737 Gateway West, Suite 350 El Paso, TX 79935 I want to start off by thanking WRRI for inviting me dore Roosevelt recognized the flood/drought reality to speak at this conference. The people here are at the and supported the establishment of the U.S. Reclama- top of the water industry and I appreciate being includ- tion Services. As somebody mentioned earlier, we were ed with them. I was looking forward to the conference originally part of the Geological Services, so we come because I was going to be last on the agenda and I was from the same agency but were separated out. Our assured there wasn’t going to be time for rebuttal. But initial mission was to capture the springtime floods then I found out that Gary and Chuy were conspiring from snowmelt runoff and store for the benefit of set- against me for me to go first, so I almost lost my train tlers, ranchers, and farmers in the arid West. The sign of thought but I will go on with my presentation. A lot in Figure 1 says something like “thank God and U.S. of it will be repetitive but I find you have to hear some- Reclamation.” thing at least three times before you really understand it. The Upper Rio Grande/Rio Bravo Basin experienced early agricultural development under Native American I want to start out by giving a little bit of the history of Pueblos that to this day exercise their water rights in the Project. We had a very good introduction to that northern New Mexico. The basin underwent a rapid yesterday during lunch when we heard about how we period of development during the Spanish Colonial got where we are. We have droughts, floods, and not period, but for the most part, rapid development and just in the Rio Grande Project. These are common in diversion of the Rio Grande for agricultural purposes the western United States, which was the reason Theo- occurred after the construction of railroads into 1 Filiberto Cortz in said waters.” I might mention that we don’t even call the river by the same name; depending on where you are located, we refer to it as the Rio Grande on the U.S. side and Rio Bravo on the Mexican side. It is the Upper Rio Grande in Texas, Lower Rio Grande if we are in New Mexico. The Joint Commission on November 25, 1896 found that development of irrigated acreage in the San Luis Valley of Colorado had depleted the flow. Construc- tion of a reservoir to capture the flood waters of the Rio Grande would provide the best and most feasible mode of affecting an equitable distribution. It further recommended that the United States prevent the con- struction of any large reservoirs on the Rio Grande in New Mexico or restrain any such reservoir hereafter constructed from the use of waters to which the citi- Figure 1. Western farmers and ranchers benefitted by the zens of the El Paso and Juarez Valleys had right. Basi- establishment of the U.S. Reclamation Services. cally, this established the senior right on the river at El Paso and Juarez. the San Luis Valley of Southern Colorado between 1860 and 1890, when about 400,000 acres of land were On December 5, 1896, the Secretary of Interior sus- converted into agricultural development. This agricul- pended all applications for right of way for irrigation tural development had an adverse impact on the flow in New Mexico and Colorado. It remained that way of the river in the El Paso Valley. One of the first indi- until 1925. While it was in effect, the development of cations of water supply problems was recorded in an of- storage facilities was prohibited. The objections by up- ficial report from Major O.H. Ernst, U.S. Army Corps stream states were the impetus that led to the negotia- of Engineers, to the Chief of Engineers in 1889, basi- tion of the Rio Grande Compact. cally saying that “At El Paso, … the water ceases to flow and except at detached pools the bed becomes entirely The 1904 Compromise of the 12th International Irriga- dry. The diminished flow is probably due to evapora- tion Congress was to find a solution and suggested the tion and to the abstraction of portions of [the river] for Reclamation Act of 1902, from which the Reclamation irrigation purposes. In my judgment, the stream is not Services was created, be enacted or authorized. It was worthy of improvement by the General Government.” to provide an interstate and international solution. In I think that thought permeates throughout the hun- November 1904, the Reclamation Service presented a dred-year history of the Project. compromise at the 12th International Irrigation Con- gress held in El Paso, Texas. Reclamation presented Comparatively, when we look at the flows of other plans for the Rio Grande Project, which stored waters major western rivers, we see 150 million acre-feet on at Elephant Butte Reservoir and supplied southern the Columbia River, which is 10 times the Colorado New Mexico, West Texas, and the Juarez Valley. River at 15 million acre-feet, which is 15 times the Rio Grande at 1 million acre-feet. The United States So what is the Rio Grande Project? It was constructed Congress passed a resolution on April 29, 1890 call- by the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, an agency under ing on the President of the United States to negotiate the Department of Interior. It was authorized by the with Mexico to settle the international aspects of the passing of the Reclamation Act of 1902 by Congress. Rio Grande. In 1894, Mexico formally complained to It was the first civil engineering work to affect interna- the Secretary of Agriculture that increased diversions tional allocation of water between the United States in the state of Colorado were causing damages to the and Mexico. In 1907, Congress appropriated $1mil- farms in the Juarez Valley. So in 1896, Mexico and the lion to start project construction which would provide United States agreed to a joint commission to inves- 60,000 acre-feet of water annually to Mexico. tigate the water resources of the Upper Rio Grande/ Rio Bravo and report on the “best and most feasible Figure 2 is a map showing the project; Truth or Conse- mode…of regulating the use of the waters of said river quences is where Elephant Butte Reservoir is located, as to assure to each country concerned and to its in- and right below is Caballo Reservoir, constructed in habitants their legal and equitable rights and interests the mid 1930s. Percha Dam is our first diversion point 2 Lower Rio Grande Project Operating Agreement: Settlement of Litigation that irrigates the Rincon Valley. Leasburg Diversion Dam is our next diversion point that irrigates the up- per portion of the Mesilla Valley; the Mesilla Diversion Dam irrigates the lower portion of the Mesilla Valley. Then we have the American Diver- sion Dam that irrigates the upper portion of the El Paso Valley and Riverside Diversion Dam that actu- ally no longer exists but was built to irrigate the lower portion of the El Paso Valley. The water is diverted to Mexico at the International Diver- sion Dam. That is where they get their 60,000 acre-ft under a full al- location. As stated before, we irrigate about 178,000 acres of land and supple- mental hydroelectric power to south- central New Mexico. The Project features are Elephant Butte and Caballo storage dams, four diver- Figure 2. Rio Grande Project area. sion dams, 586 miles of canals and laterals, 484 miles of open drainage ditches, and a hy- the Project was authorized in 1905, it was strictly for dro-electric plant. Water provided by the Rio Grande, irrigation. There were no other uses of the Rio Grande along with improved irrigation methods, has trans- Project water supply until 1925 with the Municipal formed the desert land in the valley into a productive Water Users Act that enabled us to go and provide the region. City of El Paso with water and then for other uses that were authorized under that Act. When we first sent astronauts up to circle the earth, one of the man-made features they could readily dis- The Project provides for flood control, fish and wildlife cern was the Rio Grande Valley, the Rio Grande Proj- enhancement, outdoor recreation, research on water- ect, and its irrigated acreage.
Recommended publications
  • Rio Grande Project
    Rio Grande Project Robert Autobee Bureau of Reclamation 1994 Table of Contents Rio Grande Project.............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................6 Construction History .....................................................7 Post-Construction History................................................15 Settlement of the Project .................................................19 Uses of Project Water ...................................................22 Conclusion............................................................25 Suggested Readings ...........................................................25 About the Author .............................................................25 Bibliography ................................................................27 Manuscript and Archival Collections .......................................27 Government Documents .................................................27 Articles...............................................................27 Books ................................................................29 Newspapers ...........................................................29 Other Sources..........................................................29 Index ......................................................................30 1 Rio Grande Project At the twentieth
    [Show full text]
  • Installation of Fencing, Lights, Cameras, Guardrails, and Sensors Along the American Canal Extension El Paso District Elpaso, Texas
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INSTALLATION OF FENCING, LIGHTS, CAMERAS, GUARDRAILS, AND SENSORS ALONG THE AMERICAN CANAL EXTENSION EL PASO DISTRICT ELPASO, TEXAS Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service Washington, D.C. Prepared in Conjunction with: HDR Engineering, Inc. Alexandria, VA. Apri11999 Environmental Assessment - Fencing & Lighting Along American Canal Extension El Paso Border Patrol/INS SUMMARY PROJECT SPONSOR: U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) COMMENTS DUE TO: Manuel M. Rodriguez Chief, Policy & Planning Facilities & Engineering Immigration & Naturalization Service U.S. Department of Justice 425 Eye Street, N.W. Room 2060 Washington, D.C. 20536 Phone.: (202) 353-0383 Fax: (202) 353-8551 TIERING: This Environmental Assessment is tiered from the "Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for JTF-6 Activities Along the U.S./Mexico Border (Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California)", dated August 1994, prepared for the INS. PROPOSED ACTION: TheEl Paso Sector of the United States Border Patrol, the law enforcement arm of the INS, proposes to install fencing, lights, cameras, guardrails and sensors along portions of the American Canal Extension in El Paso, TX. The Proposed Action directly supports the mission of the Border Patrol (BP), and will provide considerable added safety to the field personnel. The project is located near the Rio Grande River in northwestern Texas. All of the project is within the city limits of El Paso. The majority of the Project Location is along a man­ made canal and levee system. Portions of the canal are at times adjacent to industrial areas, downtown El Paso, and mixed commercial with limited residential development.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment on the Rio Grande Rectification Project
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RIO GRANDE RECTIFICATION PROJECT: FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS INTERNATIONAL DAM TO RIVERSIDE DIVERSION DAM, EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission El Paso, Texas COVER SHEET FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT RIO GRANDE RECTIFICATION PROJECT FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS INTERNATIONAL TO RIVERSIDE DIVERSION DAM Lead Agency: United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission Proposed Action: Raising the approximate 15-mile International to Riverside Diversion Dam Levee System in El Paso, El Paso County, Texas to meet current requirements for flood control. Report Designation: Environmental Assessment Abstract: The United States Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) is preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) for a proposed action to raise the levee system from International Dam to Riverside Diversion Dam. The levee system under consideration for this EA, approximately 15-miles long, is located entirely in El Paso County, Texas. The levee reach is one of the priority areas within the Rio Grande Rectification Project targeted for flood control improvements. The need for improvements to the levee system was determined by hydraulic modeling completed by the USIBWC in 2003. The USIBWC hydraulic study for this reach indicated that an increase in levee height would be required to meet design criteria for flood protection. The range of increase is from 0.5 to 2.5 feet for an approximate 8.14-mile levee segment. The increase in levee height would expand the levee footprint by lateral extension of the structure. Levee footprint increases in this reach will occur within the USIBWC right-of-way and extend primarily toward the riverside of the existing levee.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande Basin
    REGIONAL ASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY 2008 RIO GrANDE BASIN Texas Clean Rivers Program International Boundary and Water Commission, United States Section PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. The preparation of this report was financed through grants from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. PARTICIPATING AGENCIES Federal International Boundary and Water Commission, United States Section United States Geological Survey Big Bend National Park Service Natural Resource Conservation Service State Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Local Sabal Palm Audobon Center and Sanctuary The City of El Paso, Public Service Board The City of Laredo Environmental Services Division The City of Laredo Health Department The Rio Grande International Study Center Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Texas Cooperative Extension, Fort Stockton The University of Texas at El Paso The University of Texas at Brownsville El Paso Community College Regional Assessment of Water Quality in the Rio Grande Basin III TABLE OF CONTENTS Participating Agencies ........................................................................................................... III Table of Contents .................................................................................................................. Index of Figures ..................................................................................................................... VIII Index of Tables .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation
    Volume 47 Issue 3 Symposium on New Mexico's Rio Grande Reservoirs Summer 2007 History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation Susan Kelly Iris Augusten Joshua Mann Lara Katz Recommended Citation Susan Kelly, Iris Augusten, Joshua Mann & Lara Katz, History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation, 47 Nat. Resources J. 525 (2007). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol47/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. SUSAN KELLY, IRIS AUGUSTEN, JOSHUA MANN & LARA KATZ* History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation" ABSTRACT Nearly all of the dams and reservoirson the Rio Grandeand its tributaries in New Mexico were constructed by the federal government and were therefore authorized by acts of Congress. These congressionalauthorizations determine what and how much water can be stored, the purposesfor which water can be stored, and when and how it must be released. Water may be storedfor a variety of purposes such as flood control, conservation storage (storing the natural flow of the river for later use, usually municipal or agricultural),power production, sediment controlfish and wildlife benefits, or recreation. The effect of reservoir operations derived from acts of Congress is to control and manage theflow of rivers. When rivers cross state or other jurisdictionalboundaries, the states are very mindful of the language in the congressional authorization.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Basin Highlights Report May 2015 Texas Rio Grande Basin Program Update
    2015 Basin Highlights Report May 2015 Texas Rio Grande Basin Program Update International Boundary and Water Commission, U.S. Section Texas Clean Rivers Program Introduction In 1991, the Texas Legislature passed the Texas Clean Rivers Act (Senate Bill 818) to address water resources in an integrated, systematic manner, creating the Texas Clean Rivers Program (CRP). CRP is a state fee-funded program specifically for water quality monitoring, assessment, and public out- reach, and aims to improve the quality of water within each river basin in Texas through partnerships with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and participating entities. The CRP for the Rio Grande Basin was originally administered by the Border Environment Assessment team of the TCEQ, which at that time was called the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TN- RCC). In 1998, the State of Texas contracted with the U.S. Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) to administer and implement the CRP for the Rio Grande Basin in Texas to monitor and address water quality issues unique to an international water boundary. The USIBWC Clean Rivers Program is responsible for collecting water quality data throughout the portion of the Rio Grande Basin that lies within the State of Texas. The USIBWC Clean Rivers Program relies on multiple partners throughout the Rio Grande basin to collect water samples and field data from 91 stations along the Rio Grande and Pecos rivers. At this time, the program is partnered with 4 laboratories and 16
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities March 2011
    RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities March 2011 Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities Prepared by United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Power Resources Office U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado March 2011 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Disclaimer Statement The report contains no recommendations. Rather, it identifies a set of candidate sites based on explicit criteria that are general enough to address all sites across the geographically broad scope of the report. The report contains limited analysis of environmental and other potential constraints at the sites. The report must not be construed as advocating development of one site over another, or as any other site-specific support for development. There are no warranties, express or implied, for the accuracy or completeness of any information, tool, or process in this report. Contents Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities Contents Page Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Opportunities in New Mexico
    53rd Annual New Mexico Water Conference Surface Water Opportunities in New Mexico October 20-22, 2008 Embassy Suites Albuquerque, NM New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute TABLE OF CONTENTS Water Conference Advisory Committee ........................................................................................ iv Conference Program ........................................................................................................................v Overview of Albuquerque’s Vision and Projects John Stomp, Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority ...............................1 Economics and Legal Limitations of Using Surface Water for Municipal Supply John D’Antonio, Office of the State Engineer .....................................................................7 Regulatory Challenges to Shifting from Groundwater to Surface Water as a Source of Drinking Water Supply Robert Pine, NMED Drinking Water Bureau ....................................................................13 Return Flow Efficiency Phil King, New Mexico State University ..........................................................................19 El Paso’s Experience in Surface Water Treatment – Lessons Learned Ed Archuleta, El Paso Water Utilities ................................................................................25 Albert E. Utton Memorial Water Lecture 100 Years of Water Management in New Mexico – Stories about the People Involved John W. Hernandez, Water Resources Consulting Engineer .............................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Elep-Hant Butte To
    PASO DEL NORTE WATE SHED INTEGRATED IVER ESTORAT ON LAN DRAFT PROP SAL FOR LAN DEVELOPME T I Elephant Butte Dam- ------i : ' Sierra Co NeN MexIco RIO GRANDE, r ELEP-HANT BUTTE TO [JonnAr ~ Co tl w Me"co FORT QUITMAN EI Paso (,0 Texas .........:......,.,.:. cl 1..11.,(1 IIudspelh Co rexas Chihuahua MexIco ~ N ..... ~Miles o 4 8 16 24 32 40 Fort Quitman 11 August 2005 Paso del Norte Watershed Council 11 August 2005 CONTE TS INTRODUCTION ........................................... .. I The Paso del Norte Watershed Restoration Project Area. ............................... .. 1 What Have We Lost? :......................................... 1 Native Fishes. .............................................................. .. 3 Riparian and Wetland Habitats 5 Avifauna 8 Water Development Projects and Their Ecological Impacts 9 A PLAN FOR ACTION. ........................................................... .. II What Are the Benefits of Restoration? ............................................. .. II Why Develop a Plan? II STAKEHOLDERS 13 The Paso del Norte Watershed Council 13 PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS 15 SCOPE OF WORK 16 Introduction .................................................................. .. 16 Existing Conditions ............................................................ .. 16 Description of Stressors 16 Restoration Goals 16 Identification and Prioritization of Strategies. ....................................... .. 18 Development of Restoration Tasks ................................................ .. 18 Time Line and Milestones. .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Figure: 30 TAC §307.10(3) Appendix C
    Figure: 30 TAC §307.10(3) Appendix C - Segment Descriptions The following descriptions define the geographic extent of the state's classified segments. Boundaries of bay and estuary segments have not been precisely defined. Segment boundaries are illustrated in the document entitled The Atlas of Texas Surface Waters (GI-316) as amended and published by the commission. SEGMENT DESCRIPTION 0101 Canadian River Below Lake Meredith - from the Oklahoma State Line in Hemphill County to Sanford Dam in Hutchinson County 0102 Lake Meredith - from Sanford Dam in Hutchinson County to a point immediately upstream of the confluence of Camp Creek in Potter County, up to the normal pool elevation of 2936.5 feet (impounds Canadian River) 0103 Canadian River Above Lake Meredith - from a point immediately upstream of the confluence of Camp Creek in Potter County to the New Mexico State Line in Oldham County 0104 Wolf Creek - from the Oklahoma State Line in Lipscomb County to a point 2.0 km (1.2 mi) upstream of FM 3045 in Ochiltree County 0105 Rita Blanca Lake - from Rita Blanca Dam in Hartley County up to the normal pool elevation of 3860 feet (impounds Rita Blanca Creek) 0201 Lower Red River - from the Arkansas State Line in Bowie County to the Arkansas- Oklahoma State Line in Bowie County 0202 Red River Below Lake Texoma - from the Arkansas-Oklahoma State Line in Bowie County to Denison Dam in Grayson County 0203 Lake Texoma - from Denison Dam in Grayson County to a point immediately upstream of the confluence of Sycamore Creek in Cooke County, up to
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar Year 2017 Report to the Rio Grande Compact Commission
    Calendar Year 2017 Report to the Rio Grande Compact Commission Colorado New Mexico Texas Kevin Rein Tom Blaine Patrick R. Gordon Federal Chairman Hal Simpson U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Albuquerque Area Office Albuquerque, New Mexico March 2018 MISSION STATEMENTS The Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation's natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Cover photo – Eric Gonzales (Reclamation) and Eileen Henry (USFWS) seine for silvery minnows while Josh Grant (USFWS) takes notes, during Reclamation's annual fall fish surveys in the San Marcial Delta Water Conveyance Channel, within the boundaries of Elephant Butte Reservoir. (Liza Yazzie, Reclamation) Calendar Year 2017 Report to the Rio Grande Compact Commission U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation March 2018 Information contained in this document regarding commercial products or firms may not be used for advertising or promotional purposes and is not an endorsement of any product or firm by the Bureau of Reclamation. Table of Contents Table of Contents ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Attached Graphic
    Figure: 30 TAC §307.10(3) Appendix C - Segment Descriptions The following descriptions define the geographic extent of the state's classified segments. Boundaries of bay and estuary segments have not been precisely defined. SEGMENT DESCRIPTION 0101 Canadian River Below Lake Meredith - from the Oklahoma State Line in Hemphill County to Sanford Dam in Hutchinson County 0102 Lake Meredith - from Sanford Dam in Hutchinson County to a point immediately upstream of the confluence of Camp Creek in Potter County, up to the normal pool elevation of 2936.5 feet (impounds Canadian River) 0103 Canadian River Above Lake Meredith - from a point immediately upstream of the confluence of Camp Creek in Potter County to the New Mexico State Line in Oldham County 0104 Wolf Creek - from the Oklahoma State Line in Lipscomb County to a point 2.0 km (1.2 mi) upstream of FM 3045 in Ochiltree County 0105 Rita Blanca Lake - from Rita Blanca Dam in Hartley County up to the normal pool elevation of 3860 feet (impounds Rita Blanca Creek) 0201 Lower Red River - from the Arkansas State Line in Bowie County to the Arkansas-Oklahoma State Line in Bowie County 0202 Red River Below Lake Texoma - from the Arkansas-Oklahoma State Line in Bowie County to Denison Dam in Grayson County 0203 Lake Texoma - from Denison Dam in Grayson County to a point immediately upstream of the confluence of Sycamore Creek in Cooke County, up to the normal pool elevation of 617 feet (impounds Red River) 0204 Red River Above Lake Texoma - from a point immediately upstream of the confluence of
    [Show full text]