Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Draft Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 June 2002 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Lead agency: United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Cooperating agencies: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs States and counties where the proposed action is located: New Mexico: Bernalillo, Sandoval, Socorro, and Valencia Counties; Abstract: This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) examines the impact on the environment of the designation of critical habitat for the Rio Grande silvery minnow (Hybognathus amarus), an aquatic species listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The silvery minnow was historically one of the most abundant and widespread fishes in the Rio Grande Basin, occurring from Espanola, New Mexico to the Gulf of Mexico. It was also found in the Pecos River from Santa Rosa, New Mexico downstream to the confluence of the Pecos with the Rio Grande in Texas. The minnow now occurs only in the Rio Grande in New Mexico, from Cochiti Dam downstream to Elephant Butte reservoir, five percent of its former range. Most of the minnows are found in the reach of the Rio Grande from San Acacia Diversion Dam to Elephant Butte, in Socorro County. Once a species is listed under the ESA, federal agencies must consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service and ensure that actions they authorize, fund or carry out do not jeopardize the species continued existence. Once critical habitat is designated, federal agencies must also consult to ensure that actions they authorize, fund or carry out do not adversely modify designated habitat. The ESA requires the Service to designate critical habitat for endangered species to the maximum extent prudent. Critical habitat includes occupied and occupied areas “essential to the conservation of the species,” and “conservation” is defined as actions necessary to bring the species to the point where it can be delisted. The Service proposes to designate as critical habitat for the minnow the currently occupied reaches of the Rio Grande in New Mexico, referred to as the Middle Rio Grande. Impacts of this alternative include an increased scope of consultations, which will be expanded to include effects of actions on critical habitat, as well as some changes to the actions to avoid adverse modification. It is likely that efforts will be made to increase the flow in the Rio Grande in areas that now experience drying events, and that this acquisition of water could impact agricultural communities. While a voluntary water market is important to maintaining silvery minnow habitat, the secondary impacts on the communities could be substantial. Efforts to minimize drying events, combined with river restoration activities for the minnow, will impact favorably on riverine and riparian ecosystems but, depending on the reduction in irrigated cropland, could reduce forage for the migratory bird population. This DEIS also analyzes the impacts of three other alternatives: (1) Designating the Middle Rio Grande, except for the Cochiti reach, the northern reach of the Middle Rio Grande and one that has undergone major changes since Cochiti Dam went online in 1975; (2) Designating the Middle Rio Grande except the San Acacia reach, the southern reach on the Middle Rio Grande and one that experiences significant drying during parts of the year; (3) Designating the Middle Rio Grande as well as two extended reaches within the minnow’s historical range, the Pecos River from Sumner Dam to Brantley Reservoir in NM and the Rio Grande in Big Bend NP and the Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River in Texas. A no action alternative is also analyzed. Public Comment: Public comments on the DEIS are welcome and will be accepted through September 4, 2002. Public comment meetings will also be held during this period. A final EIS will then be prepared. Comments should be directed to: Joy Nicholopoulos, Field Supervisor, New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2105 Osuna Blvd., NE, Albuquerque, NM 87113. H. Dale Hall Acting Regional Director Acronyms and Abbreviations AMAFCA Albuquerque Metropolitan Area Flood Control Authority BA Biological assessment BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior BO Biological Opinion bluntnose shiner Pecos bluntnose shiner BLM Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations CID Carlsbad Irrigation District Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CWA Clean Water Act, also known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act DEIS Draft environmental impact statement EA Economic analysis under Endangered Species Act EIS Environmental impact statement EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act, 16 USC sections 1531-1544 ESA Work Group Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act Collaborative Program flycatcher Southwestern willow flycatcher FR Federal Register FSID Fort Sumner Irrigation District IBWC International Boundary and Water Commission LPVRWP Lower Pecos Valley Regional Water Plan LFCC Low Flow Conveyance Channel MRG Middle Rio Grande MRGCD Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area NEPA National Environmental Policy Act, 42 USC sections 4321-4370d NMDGF New Mexico Department of Game and Fish NMHPD New Mexico Historic Preservation Division NMISC New Mexico Interstate Stream Comission NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System NPS National Park Service NWR National Wildlife Refuge OSE Office of the State Engineer, State of New Mexico OSM Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Reclamation Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior RGWSR Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River RPA Reasonable and prudent alternative under the ESA (see glossary) RPM Reasonable and prudent measures under the ESA (see glossary) Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior silvery minnow Rio Grande silvery minnow (Hybognathus aramus) iii SSCFCA Southern Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority TMDL Total maximum daily load TPW Texas Parks and Wildlife, State of Texas TNRCC Texas Natural Resources and Conservation Commission URGWOP Upper Rio Grande Water Operations USC United States Code USIBWC International Boundary and Water Commission, U.S. Section WMA Waterfowl Management Area iv Table of Contents Page Abstract ..................................................................... i Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................... iii Summary ..................................................................S-1 Chapter 1. Purpose and Need for Action ....................................... 1-1 Introduction .......................................................... 1-1 Purpose of the Action ................................................... 1-1 Need for the Action .................................................... 1-3 Background .......................................................... 1-4 Rio Grande Silvery Minnow ....................................... 1-4 Decision to List the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow as Endangered ........... 1-6 Original Designation of Critical Habitat .............................. 1-6 Present Proceeding to Prepare an EIS and Redesignate Critical Habitat ............ 1-8 Overview of the Scoping Process ................................... 1-8 Issues Raised During Scoping ...................................... 1-9 General Considerations ..................................... 1-9 Silvery Minnow .......................................... 1-10 Alternatives ............................................. 1-11 Impacts ................................................. 1-12 Permits Required for Implementation ..................................... 1-14 Related Environmental Planning ......................................... 1-14 Chapter 2. Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action .......................... 2-1 Development of Alternatives ............................................. 2-1 Alternative A – No Action Alternative ..................................... 2-5 Description of the Alternative ...................................... 2-5 Actions Associated with the Alternative .............................. 2-5 Alternative B – The Middle Rio Grande from Cochiti Dam to Elephant Butte Dam, And the Lower Jemez River ................................. 2-5 Description of the Alternative ...................................... 2-5 Actions Associated with the Alternative .............................. 2-8 Alternative C – Exclusion of the Cochiti Reach .............................. 2-8 Description of the Alternative ...................................... 2-8 Actions Associated with the Alternative ............................. 2-10 Alternative D – Exclusion of the San Acacia Reach .......................... 2-10 Description of the Alternative ..................................... 2-10 Actions Associated with the Alternative ............................. 2-10 Alternative E – Designation of Selected Reaches of the Middle Rio Grande, the Lower Rio Grande, and the Pecos River .......................... 2-12 v Description of the Alternative ..................................... 2-12 Actions Associated with the Alternative ............................. 2-14 Alternatives Considered But Not Selected
Recommended publications
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Contaminants and Their Effects on Fish in the Rio Grande Basin
    Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) Program: Environmental Contaminants and their Effects on Fish in the Rio Grande Basin S# S# S# S# S#S#S# S#S#S#S# S# S# # S S# S# # S S# S# S# S# # S# S# S S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# # S# S# # S S#S# S S# S# S# S# #S# S# S# S# S#S S# # S# SS# S# S# S#S# Scientific Investigations Report 2004—5108 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. The U.S. map shows the Rio Grande Basin (green) and stations sampled in this study (orange). Shown in gray are major river basins and stations in the conterminous U.S. sampled during other Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends Program (BEST) investigations. Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) Program: Environmental Contaminants and their Effects on Fish in the Rio Grande Basin By Christopher J. Schmitt, Gail M. Dethloff, Jo Ellen Hinck, Timothy M. Bartish, Vicki S. Blazer, James J. Coyle, Nancy D. Denslow, and Donald E. Tillitt Scientific Investigations Report 2004—5108 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CHISOS BASIN STORE Big Bend National Park Castolon Vicinity
    CHISOS BASIN STORE HABS No. TX-3399 Big Bend National Park Castolon Vicinity Brewster County HR65 Texas : O - /' ;PSTX REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 fiABS HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY % CHISOS BASIN STORE HABS No. TX-3399 Location: Green Gulch, Big Bend National Park, Castolon vicinity, Brewster County, Texas. Significance: The Chisos Basin Store, built as a temporary structure in 1941 or early 1942, is constructed of adobe in a vaguely Spanish style, part of a larger complex with this architectural theme. After the war, two prefabricated Dallas huts were added to the building. Description: The original building is one story in a T-shaped plan. The roughly coursed limestone foundation is held together with a simple mud mortar. Stuccoed walls of 10" x 15" adobe bricks were laid in common bond, and not keyed into each other at the corners, but simply butt-jointed. The roofe of the intersecting wings were low-sloped gable and shed roofs. A rounded adobe chimney poked out of the shed roof on the northern wing. The recessed porch at the front entrance provided shade from the hot desert sun. The windows consist of paired ten-light casements, and a band of four-light casements on the north wall. The flooring of the recessed porch and the steps up to the front of the building are flagstone laid in a cement-amended mortar. The original portion consists of two rooms. The walls are plastered.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY FOR: March 19, 2001
    1 LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY FOR: March 19, 2001 NRCS, Office of Legislative Affairs Room 5121, South Agriculture Bldg. (202) 720-2771 For additional information contact: Douglas J. McKalip Eric W. Carlson Sharyn C. Alvarez =============================================================== LAST WEEK FEDERAL FARM COMMODITY PROGRAMS - The House Agriculture Committee (Chairman Larry Combest, TX) held a full committee hearing on federal farm commodity programs. The witnesses were the National Farmers Union and the National Association of Wheat Growers. The Committee asked the witnesses to provide details on the direction they would like to see farm policy take in the 2002 Farm Bill. The National Farmers Union (NFU) stated that the primary goal of commodity programs should be to provide economic stability and opportunity for producers over time consistent with a responsible view of market realities, resource sustainable and food security and safety issues. The National Association of Wheat Growers (NAWG) stated that despite the economic difficulties over the last three years, the 1996 Farm Bill continues to serve the nation's farmers and ranchers well. The NAWG made positive comments about conservation programs as well. Questions included the concern with market signals, agriculture competition abroad, export values and currency exchange rates. The Committee also discussed reserve programs, market support levels and research of alternative uses of wheat. The Committee also posed questions ranging from trade issues, foreign competition, and set aside programs. LEGISLATION OF NOTE The following Bills of significance to NRCS and conservation have been introduced. BILL MEMBER PURPOSE H.R. 960 Rep. Kolbe (AZ) To amend the IRS code to exclude from taxes up to 50% capital gains value of certain land donated for qualified conservation purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Community Structure of Riverine
    FACTORS INFLUENCING COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF RIVERINE ORGANISMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPERILED SPECIES MANAGEMENT by David S. Ruppel, M.S. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Aquatic Resources and Integrative Biology May 2019 Committee Members: Timothy H. Bonner, Chair Noland H. Martin Joseph A. Veech Kenneth G. Ostrand James A. Stoeckel COPYRIGHT by David S. Ruppel 2019 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, David S. Ruppel, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I thank my major advisor, Timothy H. Bonner, who has been a great mentor throughout my time at Texas State University. He has passed along his vast knowledge and has provided exceptional professional guidance and support with will benefit me immensely as I continue to pursue an academic career. I also thank my committee members Dr. Noland H. Martin, Dr. Joseph A. Veech, Dr. Kenneth G. Ostrand, and Dr. James A. Stoeckel who provided great comments on my dissertation and have helped in shaping manuscripts that will be produced in the future from each one of my chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing the Colorado River and the Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Mexico
    Sharing the Colorado River and the Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Mexico December 12, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45430 {222A0E69-13A2-4985-84AE-73CC3DFF4D02}-R-065134085251065165027250227152136081055238021128244192097047169070027044111226189083158176100054014174027138098149076081229242065001223143228213208120077243222253018219014073197030033204036098221153115024066109133181160249027233236220178084 SUMMARY R45430 Sharing the Colorado River and the December 12, 2018 Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Nicole T. Carter Specialist in Natural Mexico Resources Policy The United States and Mexico share the waters of the Colorado River and the Rio Grande. A bilateral water treaty from 1944 (the 1944 Water Treaty) and other binational agreements guide Stephen P. Mulligan how the two governments share the flows of these rivers. The binational International Boundary Legislative Attorney and Water Commission (IBWC) administers these agreements. Since 1944, the IBWC has been the principal venue for addressing river-related disputes between the United States and Mexico. The 1944 Water Treaty authorizes the IBWC to develop rules and to issue proposed decisions, Charles V. Stern called minutes, regarding matters related to the treaty’s execution and interpretation. Specialist in Natural Resources Policy Water Delivery Requirements Established in Binational Agreements. The United States’ and Mexico’s water-delivery obligations derive from multiple treaty sources and vary depending on the body of water. Under the 1944 Water Treaty, the United States is required to provide Mexico with 1.5 million acre-feet (AF) of Colorado River water annually. The 1944 Water Treaty also addresses the nations’ respective rights to waters of the Rio Grande downstream of Fort Quitman, TX. It requires Mexico to deliver to the United States an annual minimum of 350,000 AF of water, measured in five-year cycles (i.e., 1.75 million AF over five years).
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Big Bend National Park Texas May 2016 Foundation Document
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Big Bend National Park Texas May 2016 Foundation Document Unpaved road Trail Ruins S A N 385 North 0 5 10 Kilometers T Primitive road Private land within I A Rapids G 0 5 10 Miles (four-wheel-drive, park boundary O high-clearance Please observe landowner’s vehicles only) BLACK GAP rights. M WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA Persimmon Gap O U N T A Stillwell Store and RV Park Graytop I N S Visitor Center on Dog Cany Trail d o a nch R 2627 TEXAS Ra a u ng Te r l i 118 Big Bend Dagger Mountain Stairway Mountain S I National Park ROSILLOS MOUNTAINS E R R A DAGGER Camels D r Packsaddle Rosillos e FLAT S Hump E v i l L I Mountain Peak i E R a C r R c Aqua Fria A i T R B n A Mountain o A e t CORAZONES PEAKS u c lat A L ROSILLOS gger F L S Da O L O A d RANCH ld M R n G a Hen Egg U O E A d l r R i Mountain T e T O W R O CHRI N R STM I A Terlingua Ranch o S L L M O a e O d d n U LA N F a TA L r LINDA I A N T G S Grapevine o d Fossil i a Spring o Bone R R THE Exhibit e Balanced Rock s G T E L E P d PAINT GAP l H l RA O N n SOLITARIO HILLS i P N E N Y O a H EV ail C A r Slickrock H I IN r LL E T G Croton Peak S S Mountain e n Government n o i I n T y u Spring v Roys Peak e E R e le n S o p p a R i Dogie h C R E gh ra O o u G l n T Mountain o d e R R A Panther Junction O A T O S Chisos Mountains r TERLINGUA STUDY BUTTE/ e C BLACK MESA Visitor Center Basin Junction I GHOST TOWN TERLINGUA R D Castolon/ Park Headquarters T X o o E MADERAS Maverick Santa Elena Chisos Basin Road a E 118
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(S): Noel M
    Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(s): Noel M. Burkhead Source: BioScience, 62(9):798-808. 2012. Published By: American Institute of Biological Sciences URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.5 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Articles Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 NOEL M. BURKHEAD Widespread evidence shows that the modern rates of extinction in many plants and animals exceed background rates in the fossil record. In the present article, I investigate this issue with regard to North American freshwater fishes. From 1898 to 2006, 57 taxa became extinct, and three distinct populations were extirpated from the continent. Since 1989, the numbers of extinct North American fishes have increased by 25%. From the end of the nineteenth century to the present, modern extinctions varied by decade but significantly increased after 1950 (post-1950s mean = 7.5 extinct taxa per decade).
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Law of the Rio Chama The Utton Transboundary Resources Center 2007 History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation Susan Kelly UNM School of Law, Utton Center Iris Augusten Joshua Mann Lara Katz Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/uc_rio_chama Recommended Citation Kelly, Susan; Iris Augusten; Joshua Mann; and Lara Katz. "History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation." (2007). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/uc_rio_chama/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The Utton Transboundary Resources Center at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law of the Rio Chama by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact amywinter@unm.edu, lsloane@salud.unm.edu, sarahrk@unm.edu. SUSAN KELLY, IRIS AUGUSTEN, JOSHUA MANN & LARA KATZ* History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation" ABSTRACT Nearly all of the dams and reservoirson the Rio Grandeand its tributaries in New Mexico were constructed by the federal government and were therefore authorized by acts of Congress. These congressionalauthorizations determine what and how much water can be stored, the purposesfor which water can be stored, and when and how it must be released. Water may be storedfor a variety of purposes such as flood control, conservation storage (storing the natural flow of the river for later use, usually municipal or agricultural),power production, sediment controlfish and wildlife benefits, or recreation. The effect of reservoir operations derived from acts of Congress is to control and manage theflow of rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Timing of the Largescale Stoneroller, Campostoma Oligolepis, in the Flint River, Alabama
    REPRODUCTIVE TIMING OF THE LARGESCALE STONEROLLER, CAMPOSTOMA OLIGOLEPIS, IN THE FLINT RIVER, ALABAMA by DANA M. TIMMS A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Biological Sciences to The School of Graduate Studies of The University of Alabama in Huntsville HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Bruce Stallsmith for all his guidance on this project and greater dedication to raising awareness to Alabama’s river ecosystems. I am grateful to my other committee members, Dr. Gordon MacGregor and Dr. Debra Moriarity also from UAH. Thanks to everyone who braved the weather and elements on collecting trips: Tiffany Bell, Austin Riley, Chelsie Smith, and Joshua Mann. I would like to thank Megan McEown, Corinne Peacher, and Bonnie Ferguson for dedicating long hours in the lab. Special thanks to Matthew Moore who assisted in collections, lab work, and data processing. Most of all, I would like to thank my husband, Patrick, for his love and encouragement in all my endeavors. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page • List of Figures viii • List of Tables x • CHAPTER ONE: Introduction 1 o Context 1 o Campostoma oligolepis Taxonomy 3 o History of Campostoma oligolepis 4 ▪ Campostoma oligolepis in the South 6 ▪ Campostoma Hybridization 8 ▪ Campostoma Ranges and Species Differentiation 9 ▪ Life History 12 ▪ Reproduction 12 o Purpose and Hypothesis 15 • CHAPTER TWO: Methodology 17 o Laboratory Analysis 19 o Reproductive Data 21 o Ovary and Oocyte Staging 22 o Statistical Analysis 22 • CHAPTER THREE: Results 27 o Reproductive Data 29 ▪ Ovary and Oocyte Development 32 ▪ Testicular Development 39 vi • CHAPTER FOUR: Discussion 40 o Study Limitations 40 o Lateral Line Scale Count 41 o Reproductive Cues and Environmental Influences 42 o Multiple-spawners 42 o Asymmetry of Ovaries 42 o Bourgeois Males 43 o Campostoma variability 44 o Conclusion 45 • WORKS CITED 46 vii LIST OF FIGURES Page • 1.1 Campostoma oligolepis, Largescale Stoneroller, specimens from the Flint River, Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Chama Flow Project Hough Short in Length, the Rio Chama Is Among the Most Regulated Tstretches of River in the West
    Improving River Management for People & Wildlife he Rio Chama is a river of both beauty and significance that rises in the San TJuan Mountains and flows 130 miles to its confluence with the Rio Grande. It runs through spruce and pine-clad slopes, colorful sandstone mesas and rich farming valleys. As the largest tributary in the upper Rio Grande basin, its flows have long supplied water to ancient pueblo people, traditional acequias and modern users, here and throughout the Rio Grande Valley. During the past century, the river became the subject of intensive water development. El Vado (1935), Abiquiu (1963) and Heron (1974) reservoirs captured the abundance of spring runoff to regulate water supplies throughout the year. Legal regimes have thus grown up to govern the division of the Chama’s water, transforming the river from dependency on local and natural forces to one whose flows now respond to a complex of distant administrative mandates. These institutions enforce the on-going alteration of the river’s basic, life-sustaining processes. river’s natural flow regime – its seasonality, Avolume and duration of its rise and fall over time – sustains native biodiversity and the integrity of aquatic and riparian ecosystems. Flow is the key serve to maintain today’s socio-economic benefits? process that supports a healthy river, enabling a river Could they fulfill some of the river’s unrealized to provide valuable services – clean water, flood potential, while also recovering a measure of its lost storage, groundwater recharge, abundant wildlife, values in the El Vado to Abiquiu reach? healthy riparian forests and recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Natural Resources, and the Urban Landscape 42 Chapter Two
    CHAPTER TWO WATER: A LIMITING FACTOR D E C I S I O N - M A K E R S FIELD CONFERENCE 2009 The Albuquerque Region 40 CHAPTER TWO The diversion dam on the Rio Grande just south of the Alameda bridge. EISEY H DRIEL © A DECISION-MAKERS FIELD GUIDE 2009 WATER: A LIMITING FACTOR 41 Water Supply Limitations in the Albuquerque Area Deborah L. Hathaway, S. S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc. ater: the limiting factor. Albuquerque residents This water supply is highly variable from year to year Wand their political leaders are familiar with but in part can be stored by the Middle Rio Grande this concept, as are urban planners and developers. Conservancy District (MRGCD) at El Vado Reservoir. Water is a high-profile hurdle that confronts urban Native surface water represented by upstream inflow at development and attracts uncountable legal and the Otowi gage (with adjustment for upstream storage engineering efforts. Legions of attorneys and engineers and imported water) is subject to apportionment under make careers of developing “innovative” schemes the Rio Grande Compact, which caps native surface to surmount the water supply hurdle, and although water inflow available for depletion in New Mexico. these may be time-consuming and expensive, seldom Native surface water comprises the bulk of water used does lack of water impede a strongly motivated and for agriculture in the Albuquerque area and is diverted well-financed development plan. “Finding water” often into MRGCD canals at Angostura. Further north and results in a water transfer, for example, a shift of water south within the Albuquerque Basin, water for irriga- from agricultural to urban uses.
    [Show full text]