DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities March 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities March 2011 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities March 2011 Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities Prepared by United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Power Resources Office U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado March 2011 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Disclaimer Statement The report contains no recommendations. Rather, it identifies a set of candidate sites based on explicit criteria that are general enough to address all sites across the geographically broad scope of the report. The report contains limited analysis of environmental and other potential constraints at the sites. The report must not be construed as advocating development of one site over another, or as any other site-specific support for development. There are no warranties, express or implied, for the accuracy or completeness of any information, tool, or process in this report. Contents Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities Contents Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ ES-1 Chapter 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Federal Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower ..................................... 1-2 1.1.2 Section 1834 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ..................................................... 1-2 1.1.3 Renewable Energy Incentive Programs .................................................................. 1-3 1.2 Purpose and Objectives ....................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Resource Assessment Overview ......................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Public Input ......................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Report Content .................................................................................................................... 1-5 Chapter 2 Hydropower Site Data Collection .................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Site Location and Proximity Data ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Site Hydrologic Data........................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 Flow ...................................................................................................................... 2-13 2.2.2 Net Hydraulic Head .............................................................................................. 2-14 2.3 Data for Canals and Tunnels ............................................................................................. 2-14 2.4 Data Sources ..................................................................................................................... 2-15 2.5 Data Collection and Confidence Levels ........................................................................... 2-16 2.6 Site Data Summary ........................................................................................................... 2-17 Chapter 3 Site Analysis Methods and Assumptions ...................................................... 3-1 3.1 Power Production Potential................................................................................................. 3-2 3.1.1 Design Head and Flow ............................................................................................ 3-2 3.1.2 Turbine Selection and Efficiency ............................................................................ 3-2 3.1.3 Power Production Calculations ............................................................................... 3-9 3.2 Benefits Evaluation ........................................................................................................... 3-11 3.2.1 Power Generation .................................................................................................. 3-12 3.2.2 Green Incentives ................................................................................................... 3-13 3.3 Cost Estimates ................................................................................................................... 3-15 3.3.1 Construction Costs ................................................................................................ 3-16 3.3.2 Total Development Costs ...................................................................................... 3-17 3.3.3 Operation and Maintenance Costs ........................................................................ 3-17 3.3.4 Cost Calculations .................................................................................................. 3-18 3.4 Benefit Cost Ratio and Internal Rate of Return ................................................................ 3-19 3.5 Constraints Analysis ......................................................................................................... 3-20 3.5.1 Potential Regulatory Constraints .......................................................................... 3-20 3.5.2 Constraint Mapping .............................................................................................. 3-22 3.5.3 Local Information for Fish and Wildlife and Fish Passage Constraints ............... 3-22 i – March 2011 Contents Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities Chapter 4 Hydropower Assessment Tool ....................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Model Software ................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Model Components ............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.3 Model Usage ....................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.4 Application and Limitations ............................................................................................... 4-3 Chapter 5 Site Evaluation Results ................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Great Plains Region ............................................................................................................ 5-2 5.1.1 Overview. ................................................................................................................ 5-2 5.1.2 Power Production .................................................................................................... 5-7 5.1.3 Economic Evaluation. ............................................................................................. 5-9 5.1.4 Constraints Evaluation .......................................................................................... 5-11 5.2 Lower Colorado Region .................................................................................................... 5-16 5.2.1 Overview. .............................................................................................................. 5-16 5.2.2 Power Production .................................................................................................. 5-17 5.2.3 Economic Evaluation. ........................................................................................... 5-17 5.2.4 Constraints Evaluation .......................................................................................... 5-18 5.3 Mid-Pacific Region ........................................................................................................... 5-21 5.3.1 Overview. .............................................................................................................. 5-21 5.3.2 Power Production .................................................................................................. 5-24 5.3.3 Economic Evaluation. ........................................................................................... 5-24 5.3.4 Constraints Evaluation .......................................................................................... 5-25 5.4 Pacific Northwest Region ................................................................................................. 5-29 5.4.1 Overview. .............................................................................................................. 5-29 5.4.2 Power Production .................................................................................................. 5-33 5.4.3 Economic Evaluation. ........................................................................................... 5-34 5.4.4 Constraints Evaluation .......................................................................................... 5-35 5.5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Floods in North and South Dakota Frequency and Magnitude
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS IN NORTH AND SOUTH DAKOTA FREQUENCY AND MAGNITUDE By John A. McCabe and Orlo A. Crosby Prepared in cooperation with the NORTH DAKOTA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT AND THE SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS Open-file report Bismarck, North Dakota May 1959 DEC 15 1967 PREFACE This report was prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the North Dakota State Highway Department and the South Dakota Department of Highways. The work was performed under the supervision of H. M. Erskine. District Engineer, Surface Water Branch. Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey. The authors were assisted by R. E. West. Advice and review were furnished by the Floods Section. Surface Water Branch, Washington. D. C. The streamflow records used in this report were collected and compiled by the U. S. Geological Survey co­ operating with the following agencies: the North Dakota State Engineer and State Water Conservation Commission; pthe South Dakota State Engineer, State Geologist. State Fish and Game Commission, and State Water Resources Commission; the Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army; the Department of State; the Bureau of Reclamation and the Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; the Soil Conservation Service, Department of Agriculture; and others. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract. .................. 1 Gaging-station records--Continued Introduction ................. 1 Red River of the North basin--Continued Description of the area .......... 1 Sheyenne River at West Fargo, Physiography ............ 1 N. Dak. (13). ........... 41 Climate ............... 1 Maple River at Mapleton, N. Dak. (14) . 42 Causes of floods ............. 1 Rush River at Amenia, N.
    [Show full text]
  • North Dakota 2016 Integrated Section 305(B) Water Quality Assessment Report and Section 303(D) List of Waters Needing Total Maximum Daily Loads
    North Dakota 2016 Integrated Section 305(b) Water Quality Assessment Report and Section 303(d) List of Waters Needing Total Maximum Daily Loads Submitted to the US EPA January 23, 2017 Approved February 21, 2017 North Dakota 2016 Integrated Section 305(b) Water Quality Assessment Report and Section 303(d) List of Waters Needing Total Maximum Daily Loads Doug Burgum, Governor Arvy Smith and L. David Glatt, Co-acting State Health Officer North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality Gold Seal Center, 4th Floor 918 East Divide Ave. Bismarck, North Dakota 58501-1947 701.328.5210 . Cover Photograph Photograph of Gravel Lake located in the Turtle Mountain region of the state (Rolette County). Gravel Lake was sampled by the North Dakota Department of Health in 2012 as part of the US EPA sponsored National Lakes Assessment. i CONTENTS PART I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................. I-1 PART II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. II-1 A. Section 305(b) Water Quality Assessment Report .......................................................... II-1 B. Section 303(d) TMDL List of Water Quality-limited Waters.......................................... II-1 PART III. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................... III-1 A. Atlas ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE RIO GRANDE Inside: Putting the Pieces Together on This Important Binational Water Source
    Winter 2021 THE RIO GRANDE Inside: Putting the pieces together on this important binational water source Texas A&M AgriLife Research Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Texas A&M University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Message from Assistant Director of TWRI, Allen Berthold Published by Texas Water Resources Institute Editor Working to make Kerry Halladay Texas Water Resources Institute every drop count Art Direction When you think about the Rio Grande, what comes to mind? The songs written about it? The cultures surrounding it? That it’s a physical border between two Audrey Guidry countries? The growing populations on both sides of the border that rely on that Texas A&M AgriLife Marketing water? The fact that in recent history it hasn’t reached the Gulf of Mexico? Or and Communications maybe it seems like some mystical landmark you only hear about on the news? Whatever your thoughts, the Rio Grande is an extremely important landmark, Assistant Editors resource and cultural icon in our history. Wars have been fought over using it as a border. There have been battles in courtrooms over allocation of its water. There is Danielle Kalisek a strong sense of culture and pride among those who live within close proximity Sarah Richardson of it. All viewpoints on the importance of the Rio Grande are valid, but they also present some unique challenges and have caused the river to be classified as one C hantal C ough-Schulze of the top most endangered American and world rivers according to the World Ava English Texas Water Resources Institute Wildlife Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Leasburg Diversion Dam Flows Along the Rio Grande River About a Mile and a Half Northwest of Fort Selden Historic Site
    H. Davis with the U.S. military was Explore History, Where It Happened surveying the area for use as a military Visit New Mexico Historic Sites and explore the state’s most important places. post. These seven historic sites and one historic property highlight the traditions and Today, the Diversion Dam is part of culture of New Mexico. It is an experience LEASBURG Leasburg Dam State Park, designated a you won’t forget. state park in 1971. DIVERSION DAM Help Preserve Fort Selden Help us preserve Fort Selden by becoming a site volunteer or by making a designated gift to the Museum of NM Foundation for the Fort’s preservation and interpretation. 100% of your gifts will be used to support Fort Selden. Become a Friend of Fort Selden Join other community members as we work to form a non-profit group to support the Fort. Call us for more information at 575-202-1638. The Leasburg Diversion Dam flows along the Rio Grande River about a mile and a half northwest of Fort Selden Historic Site. This diversion dam is vitally important to the region because water is one of New Mexico’s most important commodities. For thousands of years the Rio Grande has been a source of water for travelers, settlers, and livestock and provided water for crop irrigation. Fort Selden Historic Site However, the Rio Grande is an extremely powerful force of nature. It 1280 Ft. Selden Rd. Radium Springs, NM 88054 is a naturally moving river whose path changes on an almost yearly basis. Phone (575) 526-8911 Regional Office: (575) 202-1638 nmhistoricsites.org In the mid-19th century, settlers in the two flood controls in Picacho North and through to the Juarez Valley can have Upper Mesilla Valley were looking for Picacho South; and diversion dams access to water when needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Contaminants and Their Effects on Fish in the Rio Grande Basin
    Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) Program: Environmental Contaminants and their Effects on Fish in the Rio Grande Basin S# S# S# S# S#S#S# S#S#S#S# S# S# # S S# S# # S S# S# S# S# # S# S# S S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# # S# S# # S S#S# S S# S# S# S# #S# S# S# S# S#S S# # S# SS# S# S# S#S# Scientific Investigations Report 2004—5108 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. The U.S. map shows the Rio Grande Basin (green) and stations sampled in this study (orange). Shown in gray are major river basins and stations in the conterminous U.S. sampled during other Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends Program (BEST) investigations. Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) Program: Environmental Contaminants and their Effects on Fish in the Rio Grande Basin By Christopher J. Schmitt, Gail M. Dethloff, Jo Ellen Hinck, Timothy M. Bartish, Vicki S. Blazer, James J. Coyle, Nancy D. Denslow, and Donald E. Tillitt Scientific Investigations Report 2004—5108 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Rio Grande Water Operations FWCA Report
    Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report for the Upper Rio Grande Water Operations Review and Environmental Impact Statement Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas Submitted to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque, New Mexico U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission Albuquerque, New Mexico Prepared by: John C. Branstetter U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office 2105 Osuna Road NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113 August 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA .......................................................................................3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................................7 I-3...............................................................................................................................................9 I-2...............................................................................................................................................9 I-1...............................................................................................................................................9 E-3..............................................................................................................................................9 D-3 ...........................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • 06-14-11 2010 Coachella UWMP Draft
    2010 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN City of Coachella Prepared By: TKE Engineering and Planning 2305 Chicago Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 680-0440 Draft June 2011 City of Coachella 2010 Urban Water Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................. ACR-1 1 Urban Water Management Plan Preparation 1.1 Purpose and UWMP Summary ............................................................ 1-1 1.2 Agency Coordination and Public Participation ....................................... 1-2 1.3 UWMP Update Preparation ................................................................... 1-4 1.4 UWMP Adoption, Submittal, and Implementation .................................. 1-4 2 System Description 2.1 Service Area Description ....................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Facilities ....................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.2 Climate ......................................................................................... 2-5 2.2 Service Area Population ........................................................................ 2-5 2.2.2 Demographics .............................................................................. 2-6 3 System Demands 3.1 Water Demands .................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Past and Current Water Use ........................................................ 3-1 3.1.2 Water Demand
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Colorado Regulations 1 H
    DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Wildlife CHAPTER W-1 - FISHING 2 CCR 406-1 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _________________________________________________________________________ ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS #100 – DEFINITIONS See also 33-1-102, C.R.S and Chapter 0 of these regulations for other applicable definitions. A. "Artificial flies and lures" means devices made entirely of, or a combination of, natural or synthetic non-edible, non-scented (regardless if the scent is added in the manufacturing process or applied afterward), materials such as wood, plastic, silicone, rubber, epoxy, glass, hair, metal, feathers, or fiber, designed to attract fish. This definition does not include anything defined as bait in #100.B below. B. "Bait" means any hand-moldable material designed to attract fish by the sense of taste or smell; those devices to which scents or smell attractants have been added or externally applied (regardless if the scent is added in the manufacturing process or applied afterward); scented manufactured fish eggs and traditional organic baits, including but not limited to worms, grubs, crickets, leeches, dough baits or stink baits, insects, crayfish, human food, fish, fish parts or fis h eggs. C. "Chumming" means placing fish, parts of fish, or other material upon which fish might feed in the waters of this state for the purpose of attracting fish to a particular area in order that they might be taken, but such term shall not include fishing with baited hooks or live traps. D. “Game fish” means all species of fish except unregulated species, prohibited nongame, endangered and threatened species, which currently exist or may be introduced into the state and which are classified as game fish by the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Elwell (Tiber Dam)
    Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2013 Summary of Actual Operations Water Year 2014 Annual Operating Plans U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARIES OF OPERATION FOR WATER YEAR 2013 FOR RESERVOIRS IN MONTANA, WYOMING, AND THE DAKOTAS INTRODUCTION RESERVOIRS UNDER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MONTANA AREA OFFICE SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS DURING WY 2013 ........................................................................................................................ 1 FLOOD BENEFITS...................................................................................................................... 12 UNIT OPERATIONAL SUMMARIES FOR WY 2013 .............................................................. 14 Clark Canyon Reservoir ............................................................................................................ 14 Canyon Ferry Lake and Powerplant ......................................................................................... 21 Helena Valley Reservoir ........................................................................................................... 32 Sun River Project ...................................................................................................................... 34 Gibson Reservoir .................................................................................................................. 34 Pishkun Reservoir ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • All-American Canal Lining Project
    Supplemental Information Report All-American Canal Lining Project Prepared by: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation January 12, 2006 Executive Summary The lining of the All-American Canal (AAC) has been considered for decades, and in 1988 Public Law 100-675 authorized the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) to construct a parallel lined canal or to otherwise recover the seepage from the canal using construction funds from California water agencies entitled to the use of Colorado River water. In April of 1994, Reclamation completed a Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the AAC Lining Project (AAC Final EIS/EIR) that analyzed various alternatives to implement Public Law 100-675. The Record of Decision (ROD) for the Project was signed on July 29, 1994, and selected construction of a 23-mile parallel canal as the means to conserve approximately 67,700 acre-feet of seepage from the AAC. For a variety of reasons, non-Federal funding for implementation of the Project was unavailable, and agreements on funding sources and the allocation of water conserved by the Project remained unresolved for a number of years after execution of the ROD. As a result of an intensive effort to require California to limit its use of Colorado River water in a normal year to its legal apportionment (and limit its historic overuse of Colorado River water), a series of agreements were signed in 2002 and 2003. Funding for the AAC Lining Project was authorized by the California Legislature in September 2003. Final designs for the AAC Lining Project were initiated in 2004 and largely completed in early January 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Law of the Rio Chama The Utton Transboundary Resources Center 2007 History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation Susan Kelly UNM School of Law, Utton Center Iris Augusten Joshua Mann Lara Katz Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/uc_rio_chama Recommended Citation Kelly, Susan; Iris Augusten; Joshua Mann; and Lara Katz. "History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation." (2007). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/uc_rio_chama/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The Utton Transboundary Resources Center at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law of the Rio Chama by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. SUSAN KELLY, IRIS AUGUSTEN, JOSHUA MANN & LARA KATZ* History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation" ABSTRACT Nearly all of the dams and reservoirson the Rio Grandeand its tributaries in New Mexico were constructed by the federal government and were therefore authorized by acts of Congress. These congressionalauthorizations determine what and how much water can be stored, the purposesfor which water can be stored, and when and how it must be released. Water may be storedfor a variety of purposes such as flood control, conservation storage (storing the natural flow of the river for later use, usually municipal or agricultural),power production, sediment controlfish and wildlife benefits, or recreation. The effect of reservoir operations derived from acts of Congress is to control and manage theflow of rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Report No. REC-ERC-90-L, “Compilation Report on the Effects
    REC-ERC-SO-1 January 1990 Denver Office U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation 7-2090 (4-81) Bureau of Reclamation TECHNICAL REEPORT STANDARD TITLE PAG 3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG ~0. 5. REPORT DATE Compilation Report on the Effects January 1990 of Reservoir Releases on 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE Downstream Ecosystems D-3742 7. AUTHOR(S) 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION E. Cheslak REPORT NO. J. Carpenter REC-ERC-90-1 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Bureau of Reclamation Denver Office 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Denver CO 80225 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS Same 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE DIBR 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Microfiche and/or hard copy available at the Denver Office, Denver, Colorado. Ed: RDM 16. ABSTRACT Most of the dams built by the Bureau of Reclamation were completed before environmental regulations such as the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Protection Act, or Toxic Substances Control Act existed. The management and operation of dams was instituted under conditions where the ecology of the downstream habitat was unknown and largely ignored. Changing or modifying structures, flow regimes, and land use patterns are some of the efforts being pursued by the Bureau to reconcile or mitigate the effects of impoundment to comply with these environmental policies and to maximize the potential for recreation, fisheries, and water quality in tailwater habitats for the water resource users. The purpose of this report is to provide a reference document intended to aid in the management, compliance, and problem solving processes necessary to accomplish these goals in Bureau tailwater habitats.
    [Show full text]