Efforts Towards a Pure Culture of a Vorticella Sp. from Cedar Swamp Elaina Graham1 1 University of Southern California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Efforts Towards a Pure Culture of a Vorticella Sp. from Cedar Swamp Elaina Graham1 1 University of Southern California Efforts towards a pure culture of a Vorticella sp. from Cedar Swamp Elaina Graham1 1 University of Southern California Abstract Microbial eukaryotes are extremely morphologically diverse. Vorticella, which are ciliates are a unique group of sessile peritrichs that form a contractile stalk. Unlike other organisms with contractile stalks like Zoothamnium and Carchesium, Vorticella has a single stalk and single zooid. Despite previous descriptions of the group few large imaging efforts have been done to capture cellular and nuclei structure. Here I use DAPI to show the macro- and micro- nuclei structure in in depth 3-dimensions using a Z-stack. The microtubule network is also visualized similarly in 3-dimensions to show the structural difference in the telotroch and trophont life stages, as well as the unique microtubulin centers along the length of the contractile tail. Introduction Within marine and freshwater ecosystem, a diverse array of microbial life exists. Microbes, which include bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes plat important roles in global biogeochemical cycling, particularly with respect to carbon 1. In recent years much effort has been placed in understanding the metabolic diversity, biogeography, and ecology of bacteria and archaea through massive sequencing initiatives2–4. Microbial eukaryotes are extremely underrepresented in genomics though. If you opened up NCBI today you’d find that 152,040 genomes representing bacteria and archaea (Date Collected 07/26/2018). In contrast NCBI contains only 6,262 eukaryotic genomes, of which 3,329 are fungi, 1646 are animals, 622 are plants, and 665 are protists. This bias in the database is surprising considering protist comprise most of the diversity within the eukaryotes5. Beyond this bias in genomics sequencing there is a lack of thorough information documenting the morphological diversity within the microbial eukaryotes. Eukaryotes tend to large genomes with many chromosomes, smaller populations, and more variance within gene families6. This makes them more difficult to study than bacteria and archaea. Within the microbial eukaryotes members of the SAR supergroup (Stramenopiles, Aveolates, Rhizaria) are particularly underrepresented in environmentally relevant studies. Vorticella is one interesting species which was first recorded in 1676 by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek7 and although previously brought into culture has few extensive microscopy initiatives to create a digital record of cellular morphology. This group is also interesting evolutionary as they have been discovered in a 200 million year old fossil8. Vorticella is a genera of peritrichs which falls within the Ciliophora (ciliates). Peritrichs fall into two monophyletic clades, the Mobilida and Sessilida9. The Vorticella fall into the Sessilida which are characterized by have a cell body (zooid) and a contractile stalk. Vorticella are filter feeding ciliates that live in 1 two forms throughout their lifes; a free-living telotroch and a stalked trophont attached to a substratum via a holdfast10. The Vorticella zooid consists of a mouth like opening called the peristome where there are bands of cilia (composed of microtubules) which are used to generate a current that draws food particles too the zooid. These currents create micro-eddies which have been show to have a maximum flow velocity of 360 μm/s and can move particles 450 μm away from the peristome11. Structurally the zooid has been described as having a small food vacuole and a J shaped macronucleus and single micronucleus12. This is characteristic of many ciliates, whereby the micronucleus acts as the germ line and does not express the genes13. One of the most unique aspects of the Vorticella genera is its contractile stalk. The stalk is unique within the protists due to its adherence to a variety of surfaces, including but not limited to crustaceans11, algae10, diatoms14, and detritus11. The stalk houses a spasmoneme (the contractile organ), a sheath, and a fibrillar matrix. The spasmoneme can coil up and retract in less than a millisecond in response to calcium signaling15. While most contractile stalks rely on ATP the Vorticella system utilizes calcium ions11. Other members of the Peritrichs such as Zoothamnium16 and Carcheslium17. The proteins in the stalk of Vorticella is believed to be a member of the centrin family of calcium binding EF hand proteins. This includes both centrin and caltractin. Electron micrography has determined that the stalk is able to attach to the substrate by an adhesive disc12. When separating the stalk from the zooid it has been suggested that G-protein signal transduction plays a role18. These interesting factors make Vorticella an ideal organisms to study as a pure culture to facilitate a better understanding about lifestyle and regulation in the Peritrichs. This project looked at Cedar Swamp near the Marine Biological Laboratory. Cedar Swamp has a highly diverse community of microbial eukaryotes as seen in Figure 1. Vorticella was enriched for from these samples when conducting experiments for enriching aerobic thiosulfate oxidizing bacteria. This is interesting because the related species Zoothamnium has been shown to have a symbiosis with a sulfur oxidizing chemolithoautotrophic bacteria which play important roles in nutrition for this organism19. 2 Figure 1. Various eukaryotes seen under wet mouns from samples collected in Cedar Swamp in July 2018. Methods Enrichment Initial enrichments for Vorticella were conducted by inoculating a 125mL flask containing 50mL of Freshwater aerobic thiosulfate autotroph medium (DI water to 1000 ml, 100X FW Base 10 ml, 1M Sodium Nitrate 5 ml, 100mM Potassium Phosphate 0.1 ml, 1M MES 5 ml, Vitamins 1 ml, Trace elements 1 ml, 1M Na Bicarbonate 5 ml, 1M Na Thiosulfate 25ml) with detrital leaf matter from the sediment surface of Cedar swamp (quantity was ~5 -10grams). Wet mounts of the sample were conducted prior to inoculation to record community. The sample was incubated at 30°C for 2 weeks. Isolation Densities of enrichment were monitored and imaged using a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope. When densities were high (e.g at least 2 individuals per 20 µL wet mount) six well plates were set up containing 5mL of Freshwater aerobic thiosulfate autotroph medium (FATAM) 1µL of yeast extract, and a glass coverslip (22x22) placed at the bottom of the well. From the enrichment 500µL was used to inoculate each of the six wells and left at room temperature for 24-48 hours. Each well was monitored daily under a Zeiss inverted microscope 3 looking for Vorticella with stalks affixed to the slide covers. When Density was at least 10 individuals the slide was carefully removed and rinsed 3 times with clean media before transferring to a new six well plate. Some individuals were also transferred in a 50µm-100µm glass pipette with a Sutter XenoWorks Micromanipulator System into individual wells. These were similarly monitored using a Zeiss inverted microscope daily. Immunostaining When slides had a dense enough population, some were selected and carefully removed from the six well plates and placed into 2% Paraformaldehyde (diluted in PBS) for 2.5 – 5 minutes. Slides were washed 3X in 1X PBS. Following this some slides were placed directly in 0.1% Triton-X for 10 minutes to permeabilize cells. Some slides were covered in 50µL of 0.8% low melting point agarose to embed cells. Following drying this slide was also permeabilized in 0.1% Triton-X for 10 minutes. Slides were then washed 3X with 1X pbs and transferred to a clean well. To this slide 20µL of a 1:200 concentration of mouse α-TAT1 anti-tubulin conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 was added and left to incubate for 4 hours at room temperature. Slides were then washed 3X with PEMBALG buffer (500ml PEM, 500ml BALG: 5g - 1% BSA , 0.5g - 0.1% NaN3, 9.1g - 100mM lysine, 2.5ml - 0.5% gelatin cold water fish). PEM was made with 100mM PIPES- pH 6.9, 1mM EGTA, 0.1mM MgSO4. Once slides were washed in PEMBALG 20 µL of 1µg/uL of 2-(4-amidinophenyl)-1H -indole-6-carboxamidine (DAPI) was pipetted and left in the dark for 10 minutes. Slides were then washed in 1X PBS 3 times and mounted on a slide with Thermofischer pro-long antifade. Slides were analyzed on a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope and a Nikon eclipse Ti2 inverted microscope. Images were analyzed in ImageJ for those images takon on the Zeiss scope and NIS-Elements for those taken on the Nikon. Results Initial visual inspection of Vorticella is seen in Figures 2A-H. The Vorticella were highly enriched at 30°C, but when returned to room temperature while in co-culture a large amoeba species overcame the enrichment. This is seen in Figure 3A-D. Interestingly these amoeba in figure 3A and figure 3D were consuming a Vorticella zooid. It is hypothesized that maintaining the culture at 30°C helped to initially select and enrich for Vorticella as other ciliates and amoeba tend to be temperature sensitive. 4 Figure 2. Various images of Vorticella throughout the enrichment. Photos 2E-G are shown in DIC, while Photos A-D and H are shown in Bright Field. All images were taken on a Zeiss Axio camera and edited in imageJ. Figure 3. Images of unknown ameoba that began growing in the enrichment when placed at room temperature. All images were taken on a Zeiss Axio camera and edited in Image J. 5 Visual analysis of the Vorticella enrichments under an inverted scope showed that although individuals picked using a micromanipulator were isolated and alive after four days they had not replicated. Due to this focus was placed on maintaining the dilution to extinction culturing method and enriching the Vorticella by transferring slides into clean media regularly. To conduct immunostaining the method of embedding the cells in 0.8% agarose was attempted first. Results indicated that embedding the cells in agarose did not improve the quality of imaging.
Recommended publications
  • Novel Contributions to the Peritrich Family Vaginicolidae
    applyparastyle “fig//caption/p[1]” parastyle “FigCapt” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2019, 187, 1–30. With 13 figures. Novel contributions to the peritrich family Vaginicolidae (Protista: Ciliophora), with morphological and Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-abstract/187/1/1/5434147/ by Ocean University of China user on 08 October 2019 phylogenetic analyses of poorly known species of Pyxicola, Cothurnia and Vaginicola BORONG LU1, LIFANG LI2, XIAOZHONG HU1,5,*, DAODE JI3,*, KHALED A. S. AL-RASHEID4 and WEIBO SONG1,5 1Institute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, & Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China 2Marine College, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China 3School of Ocean, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China 4Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia 5Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China Received 29 September 2018; revised 26 December 2018; accepted for publication 13 February 2019 The classification of loricate peritrich ciliates is difficult because of an accumulation of several taxonomic problems. In the present work, three poorly described vaginicolids, Pyxicola pusilla, Cothurnia ceramicola and Vaginicola tincta, were isolated from the surface of two freshwater/marine algae in China. In our study, the ciliature of Pyxicola and Vaginicola is revealed for the first time, demonstrating the taxonomic value of infundibular polykineties. The small subunit rDNA, ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 region and large subunit rDNA of the above species were sequenced for the first time. Phylogenetic analyses based on these genes indicated that Pyxicola and Cothurnia are closely related.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION Cooperstown, New York
    BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION Cooperstown, New York 49th ANNUAL REPORT 2016 STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK COLLEGE AT ONEONTA OCCASIONAL PAPERS PUBLISHED BY THE BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION No. 1. The diet and feeding habits of the terrestrial stage of the common newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Raf.). M.C. MacNamara, April 1976 No. 2. The relationship of age, growth and food habits to the relative success of the whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and the cisco (C. artedi) in Otsego Lake, New York. A.J. Newell, April 1976. No. 3. A basic limnology of Otsego Lake (Summary of research 1968-75). W. N. Harman and L. P. Sohacki, June 1976. No. 4. An ecology of the Unionidae of Otsego Lake with special references to the immature stages. G. P. Weir, November 1977. No. 5. A history and description of the Biological Field Station (1966-1977). W. N. Harman, November 1977. No. 6. The distribution and ecology of the aquatic molluscan fauna of the Black River drainage basin in northern New York. D. E Buckley, April 1977. No. 7. The fishes of Otsego Lake. R. C. MacWatters, May 1980. No. 8. The ecology of the aquatic macrophytes of Rat Cove, Otsego Lake, N.Y. F. A Vertucci, W. N. Harman and J. H. Peverly, December 1981. No. 9. Pictorial keys to the aquatic mollusks of the upper Susquehanna. W. N. Harman, April 1982. No. 10. The dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata: Anisoptera and Zygoptera) of Otsego County, New York with illustrated keys to the genera and species. L.S. House III, September 1982. No. 11. Some aspects of predator recognition and anti-predator behavior in the Black-capped chickadee (Parus atricapillus).
    [Show full text]
  • 28-Protistsf20r.Ppt [Compatibility Mode]
    9/3/20 Ch 28: The Protists (a.k.a. Protoctists) (meet these in more detail in your book and lab) 1 Protists invent: eukaryotic cells size complexity Remember: 1°(primary) endosymbiosis? -> mitochondrion -> chloroplast genome unicellular -> multicellular 2 1 9/3/20 For chloroplasts 2° (secondary) happened (more complicated) {3°(tertiary) happened too} 3 4 Eukaryotic “supergroups” (SG; between K and P) 4 2 9/3/20 Protists invent sex: meiosis and fertilization -> 3 Life Cycles/Histories (Fig 13.6) Spores and some protists (Humans do this one) 5 “Algae” Group PS Pigments Euglenoids chl a & b (& carotenoids) Dinoflagellates chl a & c (usually) (& carotenoids) Diatoms chl a & c (& carotenoids) Xanthophytes chl a & c (& carotenoids) Chrysophytes chl a & c (& carotenoids) Coccolithophorids chl a & c (& carotenoids) Browns chl a & c (& carotenoids) Reds chl a, phycobilins (& carotenoids) Greens chl a & b (& carotenoids) (more groups exist) 6 3 9/3/20 Name word roots (indicate nutrition) “algae” (-phyt-) protozoa (no consistent word ending) “fungal-like” (-myc-) Ecological terms plankton phytoplankton zooplankton 7 SG: Excavata/Excavates “excavated” feeding groove some have reduced mitochondria (e.g.: mitosomes, hydrogenosomes) 8 4 9/3/20 SG: Excavata O: Diplomonads: †Giardia Cl: Parabasalids: Trichonympha (bk only) †Trichomonas P: Euglenophyta/zoa C: Kinetoplastids = trypanosomes/hemoflagellates: †Trypanosoma C: Euglenids: Euglena 9 SG: “SAR” clade: Clade Alveolates cell membrane 10 5 9/3/20 SG: “SAR” clade: Clade Alveolates P: Dinoflagellata/Pyrrophyta:
    [Show full text]
  • The Planktonic Protist Interactome: Where Do We Stand After a Century of Research?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/587352; this version posted May 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bjorbækmo et al., 23.03.2019 – preprint copy - BioRxiv The planktonic protist interactome: where do we stand after a century of research? Marit F. Markussen Bjorbækmo1*, Andreas Evenstad1* and Line Lieblein Røsæg1*, Anders K. Krabberød1**, and Ramiro Logares2,1** 1 University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N- 0316 Oslo, Norway 2 Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, ES-08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain * The three authors contributed equally ** Corresponding authors: Ramiro Logares: Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Phone: 34-93-2309500; Fax: 34-93-2309555. [email protected] Anders K. Krabberød: University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. Phone +47 22845986, Fax: +47 22854726. [email protected] Abstract Microbial interactions are crucial for Earth ecosystem function, yet our knowledge about them is limited and has so far mainly existed as scattered records. Here, we have surveyed the literature involving planktonic protist interactions and gathered the information in a manually curated Protist Interaction DAtabase (PIDA). In total, we have registered ~2,500 ecological interactions from ~500 publications, spanning the last 150 years.
    [Show full text]
  • There Is Not a Latin Root Word Clear Your Desk Protist Quiz Grade Quiz
    There is not a Latin Root Word Clear your desk Protist Quiz Grade Quiz Malaria Fever Wars Classification Kingdom Protista contains THREE main groups of organisms: 1. Protozoa: “animal-like protists” 2. Algae: “plant-like protists” 3. Slime & Water Molds: “fungus-like protists” Basics of Protozoa Unicellular Eukaryotic unlike bacteria 65, 000 different species Heterotrophic Free-living (move in aquatic environments) or Parasitic Habitats include oceans, rivers, ponds, soil, and other organisms. Protozoa Reproduction ALL protozoa can use asexual reproduction through binary fission or multiple fission FEW protozoa reproduce sexually through conjugation. Adaptation Special Protozoa Adaptations Eyespot: detects changes in the quantity/ quality of light, and physical/chemical changes in their environment Cyst: hardened external covering that protects protozoa in extreme environments. Basics of Algae: “Plant-like” protists. MOST unicellular; SOME multicellular. Make food by photosynthesis (“autotrophic prostists”). Were classified as plants, BUT… – Lack tissue differentiation- NO roots, stems, leaves, etc. – Reproduce differently Most algal cells have pyrenoids (organelles that make and store starch) Can use asexual or sexual reproduction. Algae Structure: Thallus: body portion; usually haploid Body Structure: 1) unicellular: single-celled; aquatic (Ex.phytoplankton, Chlamydomonas) 2) colonial: groups of coordinated cells; “division of labor” (Ex. Volvox) 3) filamentous: rod-shaped thallus; some anchor to ocean bottom (Ex. Spyrogyra) 4) multicellular: large, complex, leaflike thallus (Ex. Macrocystis- giant kelp) Basics of Fungus-like Protists: Slime Molds: Water Molds: Once classified as fungi Fungus-like; composed of Found in damp soil, branching filaments rotting logs, and other Commonly freshwater; decaying matter. some in soil; some Some white, most yellow parasites.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrc Research Report No. 131 Effects of Feedlot Runoff
    WRC RESEARCH REPORT NO. 131 EFFECTS OF FEEDLOT RUNOFF ON FREE-LIVING AQUATIC CILIATED PROTOZOA BY Kenneth S. Todd, Jr. College of Veterinary Medicine Department of Veterinary Pathology and Hygiene University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois 61801 FINAL REPORT PROJECT NO. A-074-ILL This project was partially supported by the U. S. ~epartmentof the Interior in accordance with the Water Resources Research Act of 1964, P .L. 88-379, Agreement No. 14-31-0001-7030. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS WATER RESOURCES CENTER 2535 Hydrosystems Laboratory Urbana, Illinois 61801 AUGUST 1977 ABSTRACT Water samples and free-living and sessite ciliated protozoa were col- lected at various distances above and below a stream that received runoff from a feedlot. No correlation was found between the species of protozoa recovered, water chemistry, location in the stream, or time of collection. Kenneth S. Todd, Jr'. EFFECTS OF FEEDLOT RUNOFF ON FREE-LIVING AQUATIC CILIATED PROTOZOA Final Report Project A-074-ILL, Office of Water Resources Research, Department of the Interior, August 1977, Washington, D.C., 13 p. KEYWORDS--*ciliated protozoa/feed lots runoff/*water pollution/water chemistry/Illinois/surface water INTRODUCTION The current trend for feeding livestock in the United States is toward large confinement types of operation. Most of these large commercial feedlots have some means of manure disposal and programs to prevent runoff from feed- lots from reaching streams. However, there are still large numbers of smaller feedlots, many of which do not have adequate facilities for disposal of manure or preventing runoff from reaching waterways. The production of wastes by domestic animals was often not considered in the past, but management of wastes is currently one of the largest problems facing the livestock industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Peridinin-Containing Dinoflagellates Are Eukaryotic Protozoans, Which
    Investigation of Dinoflagellate Plastid Protein Transport using Heterologous and Homologous in vivo Systems Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) Vorgelegt dem Fachbereich Biologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg von Andrew Scott Bozarth aus Columbia, Maryland, USA Marburg/Lahn 2010 Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Philipps-Universität als Dissertation angenommen am 26.07.2010 angenommen. Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Uwe-G. Maier Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Klaus Lingelbach Prof. Dr. Andreas Brune Prof. Dr. Renate Renkawitz-Pohl Tag der Disputation am: 11.10.2010 Results! Why, man, I have gotten a lot of results. I know several thousand things that won’t work! -Thomas A. Edison Publications Bozarth A, Susanne Lieske, Christine Weber, Sven Gould, and Stefan Zauner (2010) Transfection with Dinoflagellate Transit Peptides (in progress). Bolte K, Bullmann L, Hempel F, Bozarth A, Zauner S, Maier UG (2009) Protein Targeting into Secondary Plastids. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 56, 9–15. Bozarth A, Maier UG, Zauner S (2009) Diatoms in biotechnology: modern tools and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 82, 195-201. Maier UG, Bozarth A, Funk HT, Zauner S, Rensing SA, Schmitz-Linneweber C, Börner T, Tillich M (2008) Complex chloroplast RNA metabolism: just debugging the genetic programme? BMC Biol. 6, 36. Hempel F, Bozarth A, Sommer MS, Zauner S, Przyborski JM, Maier UG. (2007) Transport of nuclear-encoded proteins into secondarily evolved plastids. Biol Chem. 388, 899-906. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Ciliate Diversity, Community Structure, and Novel Taxa in Lakes of the Mcmurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica
    Reference: Biol. Bull. 227: 175–190. (October 2014) © 2014 Marine Biological Laboratory Ciliate Diversity, Community Structure, and Novel Taxa in Lakes of the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica YUAN XU1,*†, TRISTA VICK-MAJORS2, RACHAEL MORGAN-KISS3, JOHN C. PRISCU2, AND LINDA AMARAL-ZETTLER4,5,*࿣ 1Laboratory of Protozoology, Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China; 2Montana State University, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, 334 Leon Johnson Hall, Bozeman, Montana 59717; 3Department of Microbiology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056; 4The Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543; and 5Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 Abstract. We report an in-depth survey of next-genera- trends in dissolved oxygen concentration and salinity may tion DNA sequencing of ciliate diversity and community play a critical role in structuring ciliate communities. A structure in two permanently ice-covered McMurdo Dry PCR-based strategy capitalizing on divergent eukaryotic V9 Valley lakes during the austral summer and autumn (No- hypervariable region ribosomal RNA gene targets unveiled vember 2007 and March 2008). We tested hypotheses on the two new genera in these lakes. A novel taxon belonging to relationship between species richness and environmental an unknown class most closely related to Cryptocaryon conditions
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Darwin Initiative Annual Report Important note: To be completed with reference to the Reporting Guidance Notes for Project Leaders – it is expected that this report will be about 10 pages in length, excluding annexes Submission deadline 30 April 2009 Darwin Project Information Project Ref Number 14-015 Project Title Conservation of Jiaozhou Bay: biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring using ciliates Country(ies) China UK Contract Holder Institution The Natural History Museum Host country Partner Institution(s) Ocean University of China Other Partner Institution(s) n/a Darwin Grant Value £137,897 Start/End dates of Project 1/11/05 – 30/09/09 Reporting period (1 Apr 200x to 1 Apr 2008 to 31 Mar 2009 31 Mar 200y) and annual report number (1,2,3..) Annual report no. 4 Project Leader Name Dr Alan Warren Project website Author(s) and main contributors, Dr Alan Warren (NHM); Professor Weibo Song (OUC); date Professor Xiaozhong Hu (OUC) 27 April 2009 1. Project Background Jiaozhou Bay is located near Qingdao on the NE coast of China (see map) and is a major centre for fisheries and mariculture industries, including fish, molluscs and crustaceans. It is also identified in China`s Biodiversity Action Plan (BCAP) as a potential nature reserve due to its high species richness. The environmental quality of the water in Jiaozhou Bay is therefore of immense significance for: (i) the maintenance of fisheries stock; (ii) successful mariculture; (iii) biodiversity conservation. Increased industrial activity and inadequate wastewater treatment in the area surrounding the bay, however, is compromising the marine water quality. Consequently Jiaozhou Bay is one of only seven estuarine wetland ecosystems listed in the BCAP as requiring priority conservation attention.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: IDENTIFICATION, LIFE HISTORY
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: IDENTIFICATION, LIFE HISTORY, AND ECOLOGY OF PERITRICH CILIATES AS EPIBIONTS ON CALANOID COPEPODS IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY Laura Roberta Pinto Utz, Doctor of Philosophy, 2003 Dissertation Directed by: Professor Eugene B. Small Department of Biology Adjunct Professor D. Wayne Coats Department of Biology and Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Epibiotic relationships are a widespread phenomenon in marine, estuarine and freshwater environments, and include diverse epibiont organisms such as bacteria, protists, rotifers, and barnacles. Despite its wide occurrence, epibiosis is still poorly known regarding its consequences, advantages, and disadvantages for host and epibiont. Most studies performed about epibiotic communities have focused on the epibionts’ effects on host fitness, with few studies emphasizing on the epibiont itself. The present work investigates species composition, spatial and temporal fluctuations, and aspects of the life cycle and attachment preferences of Peritrich epibionts on calanoid copepods in Chesapeake Bay, USA. Two species of Peritrich ciliates (Zoothamnium intermedium Precht, 1935, and Epistylis sp.) were identified to live as epibionts on the two most abundant copepod species (Acartia tonsa and Eurytemora affinis) during spring and summer months in Chesapeake Bay. Infestation prevalence was not significantly correlated with environmental variables or phytoplankton abundance, but displayed a trend following host abundance. Investigation of the life cycle of Z. intermedium suggested that it is an obligate epibiont, being unable to attach to non-living substrates in the laboratory or in the field. Formation of free-swimming stages (telotrochs) occurs as a result of binary fission, as observed for other peritrichs, and is also triggered by death or molt of the crustacean host.
    [Show full text]
  • Mixotrophic Protists Among Marine Ciliates and Dinoflagellates: Distribution, Physiology and Ecology
    FACULTY OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN PhD thesis Woraporn Tarangkoon Mixotrophic Protists among Marine Ciliates and Dinoflagellates: Distribution, Physiology and Ecology Academic advisor: Associate Professor Per Juel Hansen Submitted: 29/04/10 Contents List of publications 3 Preface 4 Summary 6 Sammenfating (Danish summary) 8 สรุป (Thai summary) 10 The sections and objectives of the thesis 12 Introduction 14 1) Mixotrophy among marine planktonic protists 14 1.1) The role of light, food concentration and nutrients for 17 the growth of marine mixotrophic planktonic protists 1.2) Importance of marine mixotrophic protists in the 20 planktonic food web 2) Marine symbiont-bearing dinoflagellates 24 2.1) Occurrence of symbionts in the order Dinophysiales 24 2.2) The spatial distribution of symbiont-bearing dinoflagellates in 27 marine waters 2.3) The role of symbionts and phagotrophy in dinoflagellates with symbionts 28 3) Symbiosis and mixotrophy in the marine ciliate genus Mesodinium 30 3.1) Occurrence of symbiosis in Mesodinium spp. 30 3.2) The distribution of marine Mesodinium spp. 30 3.3) The role of symbionts and phagotrophy in marine Mesodinium rubrum 33 and Mesodinium pulex Conclusion and future perspectives 36 References 38 Paper I Paper II Paper III Appendix-Paper IV Appendix-I Lists of publications The thesis consists of the following papers, referred to in the synthesis by their roman numerals. Co-author statements are attached to the thesis (Appendix-I). Paper I Tarangkoon W, Hansen G Hansen PJ (2010) Spatial distribution of symbiont-bearing dinoflagellates in the Indian Ocean in relation to oceanographic regimes. Aquat Microb Ecol 58:197-213.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromerid Genomes Reveal the Evolutionary Path From
    RESEARCH ARTICLE elifesciences.org Chromerid genomes reveal the evolutionary path from photosynthetic algae to obligate intracellular parasites Yong H Woo1*, Hifzur Ansari1,ThomasDOtto2, Christen M Klinger3†, Martin Kolisko4†, Jan Michalek´ 5,6†, Alka Saxena1†‡, Dhanasekaran Shanmugam7†, Annageldi Tayyrov1†, Alaguraj Veluchamy8†§, Shahjahan Ali9¶,AxelBernal10,JavierdelCampo4, Jaromır´ Cihla´ rˇ5,6, Pavel Flegontov5,11, Sebastian G Gornik12,EvaHajduskovˇ a´ 5, AlesHorˇ ak´ 5,6,JanJanouskovecˇ 4, Nicholas J Katris12,FredDMast13,DiegoMiranda- Saavedra14,15, Tobias Mourier16, Raeece Naeem1,MridulNair1, Aswini K Panigrahi9, Neil D Rawlings17, Eriko Padron-Regalado1, Abhinay Ramaprasad1, Nadira Samad12, AlesTomˇ calaˇ 5,6, Jon Wilkes18,DanielENeafsey19, Christian Doerig20, Chris Bowler8, 4 10 3 21,22 *For correspondence: yong. Patrick J Keeling , David S Roos ,JoelBDacks, Thomas J Templeton , 12,23 5,6,24 5,6,25 1 [email protected] (YHW); arnab. Ross F Waller , Julius Lukesˇ , Miroslav Obornık´ ,ArnabPain* [email protected] (AP) 1Pathogen Genomics Laboratory, Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering † These authors contributed Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia; equally to this work 2Parasite Genomics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Present address: ‡Vaccine and Cambridge, United Kingdom; 3Department of Cell Biology, University of Alberta, Infectious Disease Division, Fred Edmonton, Canada; 4Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Department of Botany,
    [Show full text]