DOCSLIB.ORG

Mixotrophic Protists Among Marine Ciliates and Dinoflagellates: Distribution, Physiology and Ecology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FACULTY OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN PhD thesis Woraporn Tarangkoon Mixotrophic Protists among Marine Ciliates and Dinoflagellates: Distribution, Physiology and Ecology Academic advisor: Associate Professor Per Juel Hansen Submitted: 29/04/10 Contents List of publications 3 Preface 4 Summary 6 Sammenfating (Danish summary) 8 สรุป (Thai summary) 10 The sections and objectives of the thesis 12 Introduction 14 1) Mixotrophy among marine planktonic protists 14 1.1) The role of light, food concentration and nutrients for 17 the growth of marine mixotrophic planktonic protists 1.2) Importance of marine mixotrophic protists in the 20 planktonic food web 2) Marine symbiont-bearing dinoflagellates 24 2.1) Occurrence of symbionts in the order Dinophysiales 24 2.2) The spatial distribution of symbiont-bearing dinoflagellates in 27 marine waters 2.3) The role of symbionts and phagotrophy in dinoflagellates with symbionts 28 3) Symbiosis and mixotrophy in the marine ciliate genus Mesodinium 30 3.1) Occurrence of symbiosis in Mesodinium spp. 30 3.2) The distribution of marine Mesodinium spp. 30 3.3) The role of symbionts and phagotrophy in marine Mesodinium rubrum 33 and Mesodinium pulex Conclusion and future perspectives 36 References 38 Paper I Paper II Paper III Appendix-Paper IV Appendix-I Lists of publications The thesis consists of the following papers, referred to in the synthesis by their roman numerals. Co-author statements are attached to the thesis (Appendix-I). Paper I Tarangkoon W, Hansen G Hansen PJ (2010) Spatial distribution of symbiont-bearing dinoflagellates in the Indian Ocean in relation to oceanographic regimes. Aquat Microb Ecol 58:197-213. Paper II Tarangkoon W, Hansen PJ (Submitted) Prey selection, ingestion and growth responses of the common marine ciliate Mesodinium pulex in the light and in the dark. Aquat Microb Ecol Paper III Hansen PJ, Moldrup M, Tarangkoon W, Garcia-Cuetos L, Moestrup Ø (draft manuscript) Does the marine red tide ciliate Mesodinium rubrum have replaceable symbionts? Appendix-Paper IV Farnelid H, Riemann L, Tarangkoon W, Hansen G, Hansen PJ (Submitted) Putative N2-fixing heterotrophic bacteria associated with dinoflagellate-cyanobacteria consortia in the low-nitrogen Indian Ocean Aquat Microb Ecol Paper I is reprinted with kind permission from Inter-Research 3 Preface This thesis is written as part of the fulfillment of PhD degree from the Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen. My PhD grant was supported from Rajamangala University Srivijaya, Thailand.During the PhD period, I was based at the Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL), Helsingør. However, Paper I & Appendix-paper IV were based on results from materials sampled during the “Galathea 3” expedition (Leg 7). Heartfelt thanks to my supervisor, Per Juel Hansen, for all his help and kindness throughout my study. I could not have done it without him. Apart from him being a superb supervisor in an academic way (to open my eyes on culture experiments, contribute ecological thinking, guide the writing etc.), he has also solved my many life abroad obstacles during my study (language, finding a place to stay, visa problem, etc). He is always patient, always stimulate me during my difficult moments, and a companion along the way. “Thank you for being you, Per”. I am also grateful for the stimulating contribution of the other co-authors in my 4 papers. It has been a great pleasure to collaborate with you. I am particularly grateful to Torkel G. Nielsen for providing me with the opportunity to join Leg 7 in the “Galathea 3” expedition and sharing environmental data. I also thank other scientists on board, especially Thomas Kiørboe, Andre Visser, Karen Marie Hillingsø, Maria Hastrup Jensen, Carsten Smidt (Captain of HMDS ‘Vædderen’) and his crew for their help during Leg7. Sincere gratitude to Michael Olesen, regardless of what questions I brought up to him e.g. Danes life, religion, relationship, He was always open for an enthusiastic discussion. I am grateful to all members of the plankton group at the MBL, particularly Lasse T. Nielsen, Karen Riisgaard, Louise K. Poulsen, and Morten Moldrup, who always tried to understand my Thai-English accent and were helpful. Special thanks to Morten, who was frequently bothered (questioning, asking for help, etc) by me during all these years. All my officemates, Jane W. Berens, Herik Staahl, Jon Svendsen, Michael van Deurs, Maria F. Steinhausen, Bjørn Tirsgård are thanked for their help and friendly atmosphere. Another special thank is given to Marianne Ernsted, for her help with finding books and big warm hugs when I was frustrated and homesick. Birgit Thorell Lyck, Marriane Saietz, and other staffs at the MBL and the Aquarium also deserve my thanks for their support and help during my study. 4 Many thanks to Marc Staal and Carola Simon for your generous and all thoughtfulness, you guys are my Dutch big brother and sister who have taken good care of me, in my academic as well as during free time through these years. Cátia Carreirra, Christian Lønborg, Alejandro M. Garcia, are thanked for kindly help, making me laugh and having good times even though we have only met at the last phase of my stay in Denmark but your friendship and kindness are memorized. I am also lucky that I met my new Thai friends and their in laws, Worasiri&Urlik Pederson, Akkaraya&Allan Nielsen, Chanchira&Dennis Mølbæk, Atchaneey Chamnansinp. Thanks for your warm hospitality and help. I am deeply grateful to my colleagues at the Marine Science Department, Faculty of Science and Fisheries Technology, Rajamangala University Srivijaya for their support and hard work while I was away. Thanks are specially given to Suwat Tanyaros, for the achieved grant and encouragement, and to Pornthep Wiruchawong for listening to all my problems and being helpful in a general sense. Suree Satapoomin and Ajcharaporn Piumsomboon are appreciated for their help, advice and support. Without their help I might not end up having my PhD in Denmark. I am indebted to Suriyan Saramul for his advice in using Surfer program, Patama Singhruck, Itchika Sivaipram for always being there, listening and understanding all my issues. Last but not least, million thanks are not enough for my beloved family, mom, dad, my sister, my brother, and my grandparents. Without their love, support and beliefs in me, I could never have been strong enough to endure the cold and dark winters in Denmark and finish my PhD. 28th of April 2010 Woraporn (Mam) 5 Summary The mixotrophic protists (= protists which combine heterotrophy and photosynthesis) are common in marine waters around the world. They vary widely in their photosynthetic and ingestion capabilities and they add a further complication to the marine planktonic food web. This thesis focused on 2 groups of mixotrophic protists: 1) symbiont-bearing dinoflagellates and 2) ciliates belonging to the genus Mesodinium spp. The spatial distribution (horizontal and vertical) of symbiont-bearing dinoflagellates (order Dinophysiales, genera Ornithocercus, Histioneis Parahistioneis, Cithoristes, Amphisolenia, Triposolenia) was investigated along a transect from the deep ocean (Indian Ocean) to shallow coastal waters (North West off Australia), as well as on a transect outside Broome (Australia). The symbionts of these dinoflagellates are either prokaryotic (e.g. heterotrophic bacteria, cyanobacteria) or eukaryotic algae. Cell concentrations of these dinoflagellates were very low in these waters (< 4 cells L-1). The ectosymbionts-bearing dinoflagellates were most common and had the highest species diversity in waters characterized by high temperatures (> 28 ºC) and very low nitrogen concentrations (< 0.4µM). Using light and transmission electron microscopy, we could demonstrate that Ornithocercus spp. ingested not only their ectosymbionts but also other prey items (i.e. ciliates). For future research on their physiology, the successful establishment of these organisms in laboratory culture is required. The ciliate genus Mesodinium contains heterotrophic and mixotrophic species (so far only one symbiont containing species M. rubrum has been described). This study investigated the prey selection, photo and feeding physiology of a non-symbiont containing Mesodinium species, M. pulex. The results showed that Mesodinium pulex ingests a variety of prey cells, but that ingestion rates and especially growth rates varied depending upon the diet. The effects of light and prey concentration on photosynthesis, ingestion and growth rate of M. pulex was studied in detail when fed the dinoflagellate Heterocapsa rotundata, The photosynthetic performance of Mesodinium pulex was quite small, amounting for less then 4 % of its carbon uptake, indicating that M. pulex is primarily a heterotrophic species. Despite this, light affected ingestion rates. Ingestion rates increased by a factor of 2 in the light compared to in the dark. Consequently, growth rates also increased in the light. 6 The ciliate Mesodinium rubrum contains symbionts of cryptophyte origin. In the laboratory, our strain of Mesodinium rubrum is normally cultured on cryptophytes within the “Teleaulax clade”. Prey selection of M. rubrum was investigated by offering different prey types (i.e. cryptophytes, dinoflagellate). Mesodinium rubrum ingested all the offered prey, but it could only maintain sustained growth when fed on Teleaulax amphioxeia. To test whether the symbionts of M. rubrum are permanent or temporary (replaceable), M. rubrum cultures were offered preys from 4 different cryptophyte
Recommended publications
  • Basal Body Structure and Composition in the Apicomplexans Toxoplasma and Plasmodium Maria E

    Basal Body Structure and Composition in the Apicomplexans Toxoplasma and Plasmodium Maria E

    Francia et al. Cilia (2016) 5:3 DOI 10.1186/s13630-016-0025-5 Cilia REVIEW Open Access Basal body structure and composition in the apicomplexans Toxoplasma and Plasmodium Maria E. Francia1* , Jean‑Francois Dubremetz2 and Naomi S. Morrissette3 Abstract The phylum Apicomplexa encompasses numerous important human and animal disease-causing parasites, includ‑ ing the Plasmodium species, and Toxoplasma gondii, causative agents of malaria and toxoplasmosis, respectively. Apicomplexans proliferate by asexual replication and can also undergo sexual recombination. Most life cycle stages of the parasite lack flagella; these structures only appear on male gametes. Although male gametes (microgametes) assemble a typical 9 2 axoneme, the structure of the templating basal body is poorly defined. Moreover, the rela‑ tionship between asexual+ stage centrioles and microgamete basal bodies remains unclear. While asexual stages of Plasmodium lack defined centriole structures, the asexual stages of Toxoplasma and closely related coccidian api‑ complexans contain centrioles that consist of nine singlet microtubules and a central tubule. There are relatively few ultra-structural images of Toxoplasma microgametes, which only develop in cat intestinal epithelium. Only a subset of these include sections through the basal body: to date, none have unambiguously captured organization of the basal body structure. Moreover, it is unclear whether this basal body is derived from pre-existing asexual stage centrioles or is synthesized de novo. Basal bodies in Plasmodium microgametes are thought to be synthesized de novo, and their assembly remains ill-defined. Apicomplexan genomes harbor genes encoding δ- and ε-tubulin homologs, potentially enabling these parasites to assemble a typical triplet basal body structure.
  • Cryptophyte Farming by Symbiotic Ciliate Host Detected in Situ

    Cryptophyte Farming by Symbiotic Ciliate Host Detected in Situ

    Cryptophyte farming by symbiotic ciliate host detected in situ Dajun Qiua, Liangmin Huanga, and Senjie Linb,1 aChinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China; and bDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340 Edited by David M. Karl, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, and approved September 8, 2016 (received for review July 28, 2016) Protist–alga symbiosis is widespread in the ocean, but its character- as the causative species of the bloom, with no detectable crypto- istics and function in situ remain largely unexplored. Here we report phytes and hardly any other organisms present in the bloom water − the symbiosis of the ciliate Mesodinium rubrum with cryptophyte (Fig. 1B). At 1.03 × 106 cells L 1, M. rubrum abundance in the bloom cells during a red-tide bloom in Long Island Sound. In contrast to was over 100-fold higher than the annual peak in Long Island Sound the current notion that Mesodinium retains cryptophyte chloroplasts (15). Each Mesodinium cell harbored 20 to 30 cryptophyte cells (n = or organelles, our multiapproach analyses reveal that in this bloom 16), which packed the peripheral region of the M. rubrum cells (Fig. the endosymbiotic Teleaulax amphioxeia cells were intact and 1E), with complete cell structures, including cell membranes, nuclei, expressing genes of membrane transporters, nucleus-to-cytoplasm and chloroplasts (Fig. 1C). Taking advantage of the large cell size of RNA transporters, and all major metabolic pathways. Among the Mesodinium spp. (width, 20 to 23 μm; length, 25 to 26 μm), we most highly expressed were ammonium transporters in both organ- picked M.
  • Unfolding the Secrets of Coral–Algal Symbiosis

    Unfolding the Secrets of Coral–Algal Symbiosis

    The ISME Journal (2015) 9, 844–856 & 2015 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/15 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Unfolding the secrets of coral–algal symbiosis Nedeljka Rosic1, Edmund Yew Siang Ling2, Chon-Kit Kenneth Chan3, Hong Ching Lee4, Paulina Kaniewska1,5,DavidEdwards3,6,7,SophieDove1,8 and Ove Hoegh-Guldberg1,8,9 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; 2University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia; 3School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; 4The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; 5Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia; 6School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; 7Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; 8ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia and 9Global Change Institute and ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia Dinoflagellates from the genus Symbiodinium form a mutualistic symbiotic relationship with reef- building corals. Here we applied massively parallel Illumina sequencing to assess genetic similarity and diversity among four phylogenetically diverse dinoflagellate clades (A, B, C and D) that are commonly associated with corals. We obtained more than 30 000 predicted genes for each Symbiodinium clade, with a majority of the aligned transcripts corresponding to sequence data sets of symbiotic dinoflagellates and o2% of sequences having bacterial or other foreign origin.
  • Supplementary Table S2: New Taxonomic Assignment of Sequences of Basal Fungal Lineages

    Supplementary Table S2: New Taxonomic Assignment of Sequences of Basal Fungal Lineages

    Supplementary Table S2: New taxonomic assignment of sequences of basal fungal lineages. Fungal sequences were subjected to BLAST-N analysis and checked for their taxonomic placement in the eukaryotic guide-tree of the SILVA release 111. Sequences were classified depending on combined results from the methods mentioned above as well as literature searches. Accession Name New classification Clustering of the sequence in the Best BLAST-N hit number based on combined results eukaryotic guide tree of SILVA Name Accession number E.value Identity AB191431 Uncultured fungus Chytridiomycota Chytridiomycota Basidiobolus haptosporus AF113413.1 0.0 91 AB191432 Unculltured eukaryote Blastocladiomycota Blastocladiomycota Rhizophlyctis rosea NG_017175.1 0.0 91 AB252775 Uncultured eukaryote Chytridiomycota Chytridiomycota Blastocladiales sp. EF565163.1 0.0 91 AB252776 Uncultured eukaryote Fungi Nucletmycea_Fonticula Rhizophydium sp. AF164270.2 0.0 87 AB252777 Uncultured eukaryote Chytridiomycota Chytridiomycota Basidiobolus haptosporus AF113413.1 0.0 91 AB275063 Uncultured fungus Chytridiomycota Chytridiomycota Catenomyces sp. AY635830.1 0.0 90 AB275064 Uncultured fungus Chytridiomycota Chytridiomycota Endogone lactiflua DQ536471.1 0.0 91 AB433328 Nuclearia thermophila Nuclearia Nucletmycea_Nuclearia Nuclearia thermophila AB433328.1 0.0 100 AB468592 Uncultured fungus Basal clone group I Chytridiomycota Physoderma dulichii DQ536472.1 0.0 90 AB468593 Uncultured fungus Basal clone group I Chytridiomycota Physoderma dulichii DQ536472.1 0.0 91 AB468594 Uncultured
  • 182-188 Enhanced Chlorophyll a and Primary Production in the Northern

    182-188 Enhanced Chlorophyll a and Primary Production in the Northern

    Author version: Mar. Biol. Res., vol.8; 2012; 182-188 Enhanced chlorophyll a and primary production in the northern Arabian Sea during the spring intermonsoon due to green Noctiluca (N. scintillans) bloom N. V. Madhua,*, R. Jyothibabua, P. A. Maheswaranb, K. A. Jayaraja, C.T. Achuthankuttya aNational Institute of Oceanography, Regional Centre, Kochi -18, India bNaval Physical Oceanographic Laboratory, Kochi - 21, India Abstract The surface waters of the northeastern Arabian Sea sustained relatively high chlorophyll a (av. 0.81 ± 0.80 mgm-3) and primary production (av. 29.5 ± 23.6 mgC m-3d-1) during the early spring intermonsoon 2000. This was caused primarily by a thick patch of algal bloom spread over a vast area between 17° to 21°N and 66 to 70°E. Satellite images showed exceptionally high concentration of chlorophyll a in the bloom areas, representing the annually occurring ‘spring blooms’ during February-March. The causative organism of the bloom was the dinoflagellate, Noctiluca scintillans Macartney (synonym Noctiluca miliaris Suriray, Dinophyceae: Noctilucidea), symbiotically associated with an autotrophic prasinophyte Pedinomonas noctilucae. The symbiosis between N. scintillans and P. noctilucae is likely responsible for their explosive growth (av. 3 million cells L-1) over an extensive area making the northeastern Arabian Sea highly productive (av. 607 ± 338 mg Cm-3d-1) even during an oligotrophic period such as spring intermonsoon. Key words: - Chlorophyll a; Algal bloom; Noctiluca scintillans, Pedinomonas noctilucae; Spring intermonsoon *Email of the corresponding author - [email protected] 2 Introduction The Arabian Sea (AS hereafter) is one of the most productive regions in the Indian Ocean (Madhupratap et al., 1996), exhibiting a bimodal temperature cycles annually, with lows during winter (northeast monsoon - NEM) and summer (southwest monsoon - SWM) seasons.
  • Growth and Grazing Rates of the Herbivorous Dinoflagellate Gymnodinium Sp

    Growth and Grazing Rates of the Herbivorous Dinoflagellate Gymnodinium Sp

    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published December 16 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Growth and grazing rates of the herbivorous dinoflagellate Gymnodinium sp. from the open subarctic Pacific Ocean Suzanne L. Strom' School of Oceanography WB-10, University of Washington. Seattle. Washington 98195, USA ABSTRACT: Growth, grazing and cell volume of the small heterotroph~cdinoflagellate Gyrnnodin~um sp. Isolated from the open subarctic Pacific Ocean were measured as a funct~onof food concentration using 2 phytoplankton food species. Growth and lngestlon rates increased asymptotically with Increas- ing phytoplankon food levels, as did grazer cell volume; rates at representative oceanic food levels were high but below maxima. Clearance rates decreased with lncreaslng food levels when Isochrysis galbana was the food source; they increased ~vithlncreaslng food levels when Synechococcus sp. was the food source. There was apparently a grazlng threshold for Ingestion of Synechococcus: below an initial Synechococcus concentration of 20 pgC 1.' ingestion rates on this alga were very low, while above this initial concentratlon Synechococcus was grazed preferent~ally Gross growth efficiency varied between 0.03 and 0.53 (mean 0.21) and was highest at low food concentrations. Results support the hypothesis that heterotrophic d~noflagellatesmay contribute to controlling population increases of small, rap~dly-grow~ngphytoplankton specles even at low oceanic phytoplankton concentrations. INTRODUCTION as Gymnodinium and Gyrodinium is difficult or impos- sible using older preservation and microscopy tech- Heterotrophic dinoflagellates can be a significant niques; experimental emphasis has been on more component of the microzooplankton in marine waters. easily recognizable and collectable microzooplankton In the oceanic realm, Lessard (1984) and Shapiro et al.
  • 28-Protistsf20r.Ppt [Compatibility Mode]

    28-Protistsf20r.Ppt [Compatibility Mode]

    9/3/20 Ch 28: The Protists (a.k.a. Protoctists) (meet these in more detail in your book and lab) 1 Protists invent: eukaryotic cells size complexity Remember: 1°(primary) endosymbiosis? -> mitochondrion -> chloroplast genome unicellular -> multicellular 2 1 9/3/20 For chloroplasts 2° (secondary) happened (more complicated) {3°(tertiary) happened too} 3 4 Eukaryotic “supergroups” (SG; between K and P) 4 2 9/3/20 Protists invent sex: meiosis and fertilization -> 3 Life Cycles/Histories (Fig 13.6) Spores and some protists (Humans do this one) 5 “Algae” Group PS Pigments Euglenoids chl a & b (& carotenoids) Dinoflagellates chl a & c (usually) (& carotenoids) Diatoms chl a & c (& carotenoids) Xanthophytes chl a & c (& carotenoids) Chrysophytes chl a & c (& carotenoids) Coccolithophorids chl a & c (& carotenoids) Browns chl a & c (& carotenoids) Reds chl a, phycobilins (& carotenoids) Greens chl a & b (& carotenoids) (more groups exist) 6 3 9/3/20 Name word roots (indicate nutrition) “algae” (-phyt-) protozoa (no consistent word ending) “fungal-like” (-myc-) Ecological terms plankton phytoplankton zooplankton 7 SG: Excavata/Excavates “excavated” feeding groove some have reduced mitochondria (e.g.: mitosomes, hydrogenosomes) 8 4 9/3/20 SG: Excavata O: Diplomonads: †Giardia Cl: Parabasalids: Trichonympha (bk only) †Trichomonas P: Euglenophyta/zoa C: Kinetoplastids = trypanosomes/hemoflagellates: †Trypanosoma C: Euglenids: Euglena 9 SG: “SAR” clade: Clade Alveolates cell membrane 10 5 9/3/20 SG: “SAR” clade: Clade Alveolates P: Dinoflagellata/Pyrrophyta:
  • The Planktonic Protist Interactome: Where Do We Stand After a Century of Research?

    The Planktonic Protist Interactome: Where Do We Stand After a Century of Research?

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/587352; this version posted May 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bjorbækmo et al., 23.03.2019 – preprint copy - BioRxiv The planktonic protist interactome: where do we stand after a century of research? Marit F. Markussen Bjorbækmo1*, Andreas Evenstad1* and Line Lieblein Røsæg1*, Anders K. Krabberød1**, and Ramiro Logares2,1** 1 University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N- 0316 Oslo, Norway 2 Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, ES-08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain * The three authors contributed equally ** Corresponding authors: Ramiro Logares: Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Phone: 34-93-2309500; Fax: 34-93-2309555. [email protected] Anders K. Krabberød: University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. Phone +47 22845986, Fax: +47 22854726. [email protected] Abstract Microbial interactions are crucial for Earth ecosystem function, yet our knowledge about them is limited and has so far mainly existed as scattered records. Here, we have surveyed the literature involving planktonic protist interactions and gathered the information in a manually curated Protist Interaction DAtabase (PIDA). In total, we have registered ~2,500 ecological interactions from ~500 publications, spanning the last 150 years.
  • Check List 15 (5): 951–963

    Check List 15 (5): 951–963

    15 5 ANNOTATED LIST OF SPECIES Check List 15 (5): 951–963 https://doi.org/10.15560/15.5.951 Dinoflagellates in tropical estuarine waters from the Maraú River, Camamu Bay, northeastern Brazil Caio Ceza da Silva Nunes1, Sylvia Maria Moreira Susini-Ribeiro1, 2, Kaoli Pereira Cavalcante3 1 Mestrado em Sistemas Aquáticos Tropicais, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, km 16, Salobrinho, 45662090 Ilhéus, BA, Brazil. 2 Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, km 16, Salobrinho, 45662090 Ilhéus, BA, Brazil. 3 Universidade Estadual Vale do Acaraú, Avenida da Universidade, 850, Campus da Betânia, Betânia, 62040370, Sobral, CE, Brazil. Corresponding author: Caio Ceza da Silva Nunes, [email protected] Abstract Dinoflagellates display great diversity in tropical regions and play an important role in the complex microbial food webs of marine and brackish environments. The goal of this study is to identify planktonic dinoflagellates and their distribution in the estuary of the Maraú River, Camamu Bay, state of Bahia, in a region with increasing use of shellfish farming. Samples were carried out monthly from August 2006 to July 2007 at four stations along the estuary. Plankton was sampled with a 20 μm mesh net. We identified 20 dinoflagellate species. The greatest species richness was ob- served in the genera Protoperidinium (five spp.), Tripos (four spp.), and Prorocentrum (three spp.). Based on literature, six species were classified as potentially harmful: Akashiwo sanguinea, Dinophysis caudata, Gonyaulax spinifera, Prorocentrum micans, Scrippsiella cf. acuminata, and Tripos furca. Protoperidinium venustum was recorded for the first time in coastal waters of Bahia. Keywords Brackish water, Dinophyta, distribution, potentially harmful species, taxonomy.
  • A Morphological Re-Description of Ploeotia Pseudanisonema, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Ploeotia

    A Morphological Re-Description of Ploeotia Pseudanisonema, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Ploeotia

    A Morphological Re-Description of Ploeotia pseudanisonema, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Ploeotia by Andrew Buren Brooks (Under the direction of Mark A. Farmer) Abstract The genus Ploeotia represents a group of small, colorless, heterotrophic euglenids commonly found in shallow-water marine sediments. Species belonging to this genus have histori- cally been poorly described and studied. However, a Group I intron discovered within the small subunit ribosomal DNA gene of Ploeotia costata, makes P. costata the only euglena- zoan known to possess an actively splicing Group I intron. This intron contains conserved secondary structures that indicate monophyly with introns found in Stramenopiles and Ban- giales red algae. This project describes the internal and external morphology of a related species, Ploeotia pseudanisonema, using light and electron microscopy, and investigates the possibility of a Group I intron within P. pseudanisonema. Using recently obtained SSU rRNA sequences, we also examine the phylogeny of Ploeotia, and comment on the relationship of the genus Keelungia to Ploeotia. Index words: Ploeotia pseudanisonema, Ploeotia costata, Ploeotia vitrea, Keelungia pulex, Transmission electron microscopy, Scanning electron microscopy, Small subunit rRNA, Euglenozoan Phylogeny A Morphological Re-Description of Ploeotia pseudanisonema, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Ploeotia by Andrew Buren Brooks B.S., University of Alabama, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Athens, Georgia 2010 c 2014 Andrew Buren Brooks All Right Reserved A Morphological Re-Description of Ploeotia pseudanisonema, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Ploeotia by Andrew Buren Brooks Approved: Major Professor: Mark A.
  • Protocols for Monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms for Sustainable Aquaculture and Coastal Fisheries in Chile (Supplement Data)

    Protocols for Monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms for Sustainable Aquaculture and Coastal Fisheries in Chile (Supplement Data)

    Protocols for monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms for sustainable aquaculture and coastal fisheries in Chile (Supplement data) Provided by Kyoko Yarimizu, et al. Table S1. Phytoplankton Naming Dictionary: This dictionary was constructed from the species observed in Chilean coast water in the past combined with the IOC list. Each name was verified with the list provided by IFOP and online dictionaries, AlgaeBase (https://www.algaebase.org/) and WoRMS (http://www.marinespecies.org/). The list is subjected to be updated. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species Ochrophyta Bacillariophyceae Achnanthales Achnanthaceae Achnanthes Achnanthes longipes Bacillariophyta Coscinodiscophyceae Coscinodiscales Heliopeltaceae Actinoptychus Actinoptychus spp. Dinoflagellata Dinophyceae Gymnodiniales Gymnodiniaceae Akashiwo Akashiwo sanguinea Dinoflagellata Dinophyceae Gymnodiniales Gymnodiniaceae Amphidinium Amphidinium spp. Ochrophyta Bacillariophyceae Naviculales Amphipleuraceae Amphiprora Amphiprora spp. Bacillariophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiophysales Catenulaceae Amphora Amphora spp. Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Nostocales Aphanizomenonaceae Anabaenopsis Anabaenopsis milleri Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Coleofasciculaceae Anagnostidinema Anagnostidinema amphibium Anagnostidinema Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Coleofasciculaceae Anagnostidinema lemmermannii Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Microcoleaceae Annamia Annamia toxica Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Nostocales Aphanizomenonaceae Aphanizomenon Aphanizomenon flos-aquae
  • The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: a Digital Tool to Increase The

    The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: a Digital Tool to Increase The

    Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-171 Earth System Preprint. Discussion started: 21 July 2021 Science c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Open Access Open Data The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: A digital tool to increase the discoverability and usability of plankton time-series data Clare Ostle1*, Kevin Paxman1, Carolyn A. Graves2, Mathew Arnold1, Felipe Artigas3, Angus Atkinson4, Anaïs Aubert5, Malcolm Baptie6, Beth Bear7, Jacob Bedford8, Michael Best9, Eileen 5 Bresnan10, Rachel Brittain1, Derek Broughton1, Alexandre Budria5,11, Kathryn Cook12, Michelle Devlin7, George Graham1, Nick Halliday1, Pierre Hélaouët1, Marie Johansen13, David G. Johns1, Dan Lear1, Margarita Machairopoulou10, April McKinney14, Adam Mellor14, Alex Milligan7, Sophie Pitois7, Isabelle Rombouts5, Cordula Scherer15, Paul Tett16, Claire Widdicombe4, and Abigail McQuatters-Gollop8 1 10 The Marine Biological Association (MBA), The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK. 2 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquacu∑lture Science (Cefas), Weymouth, UK. 3 Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale, Université de Lille, CNRS UMR 8187 LOG, Laboratoire d’Océanologie et de Géosciences, Wimereux, France. 4 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK. 5 15 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), CRESCO, 38 UMS Patrinat, Dinard, France. 6 Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Angus Smith Building, Maxim 6, Parklands Avenue, Eurocentral, Holytown, North Lanarkshire ML1 4WQ, UK. 7 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK. 8 Marine Conservation Research Group, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK. 9 20 The Environment Agency, Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Peterborough, PE4 6HL, UK. 10 Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB, UK.