DOCSLIB.ORG

Abstracts of Plenary Keynotes [Pdf, 1,4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abstracts of Plenary Keynotes [Pdf, 1,4 1 CONTENTS PLENARY SESSION PROGRAMME . 3 SECTION SESSION PROGRAMME SECTION 1. Safe and Effective Operation of Russian NPPs . 17 Subsection .1 .1 . .Operation, .Maintenance .and .Repair .of .NPPs .with .VVER, . RBMK, .BN .and .EGP-6 .Reactors . 18 Topical .area: .1 .1 .1 . .Operation .of .NPPs .with .VVER .Reactors . 18 Topical .area: .1 .1 .2 . .Operation .of .NPPs .with .RBMK, .BN .and .EGP-6 . Reactors . 31 Topical .area: .1 .1 .3 . .Maintenance, .Repair .and .Installation .of .NPP . Equipment . 42 Subsection .1 .2 . .Engineering .Support .to .NPP .Operations . 53 Topical .area: .1 .2 .1 . .Equipment .Life .Management .and .Nuclear .Power . Units .Lifetime .Extension . 53 Topical .area: .1 .2 .2 . .Operation .and .Upgrading .of .Electric .Equipment . and .I&C .Systems . 62 Topical .area: .1 .2 .3 . .Material .Science .and .Metal .Inspections . 78 Topical .area: .1 .2 .4 . .RW .Management, .Nuclear .Power .Units . Decommissioning .Including .Preparation .to .Decommissioning . 90 Topical .area: .1 .2 .5 . .SNF .Management . 108 Topical .area: .1 .2 .6 . .Fire .Safety . 116 Subsection .1 .3 . .Radiation .Safety, .NPP .Ecology, .Emergency .Preparedness . 144 Topical .area: .1 .3 .1 . .Radiation .Safety . 144 Topical .area: .1 .3 .2 . .NPP .Ecology . 149 Topical .area: .1 .3 .3 . .Emergency .Preparedness . .153 SECTION 2. Nuclear Power Development . 159 Subsection .2 .1 . .Advanced .Nuclear .Power .Unit .Designs . 160 Subsection .2 .2 . .Development .of .New .Nuclear .Power .Units . 167 Subsection .2 .3 . .Comissioning .of .New .Nuclear .Power .Plants . 181 SECTION 3. Nuclear Power Economics . 191 SECTION 4. International Cooperation Focused on Ensuring NPPs Safety . 203 SECTION 5. Human Resource for Nuclear Power . 213 Subsection .5 .1 . .Training .of .Young .Specialists .for .NPPs . 214 Subsection .5 .2 . .Use .of .Veterans’ .Experience .and .Expertise . .Tutorship . 220 2 PLENARY SESSION PROGRAMME 3 TODAY STATUS OF NUCLEAR INDUSTRY IN THE RF. LOOK INTO THE FUTURE THROUGH ANALYSIS OF THE PAST Petrov А.Yu. Rosenergoatom Concern JSC 1. ROSENERGOATOM TODAY: 1.1. Rosenergoatom today means 10 nuclear power plants in operation, 34 power units in commercial operation, three types of reactors; 1.2. Rosenergoatom role as a generating company in the world and in Russia; 1.3. Share of nuclear power in electric power generation through the regions in 2015. 2. DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS: 2.1. Lessons learned from Chernobyl accident; 2.2. Systems and equipment modernization to ensure safety, reliability and efficiency; 2.3. Keeping generating capacities of NPP through lifetime extension; 2.4. Programme for power output increase at NPP units in operation; 2.5. 6 new power units putting into operation; 2.6. Output, load factor; 2.7. Dynamics of faults at Russian NPPs; 2.8. Outages duration optimization; 2.9. RAW and SNF management; 2.10. Russian nuclear power plants readiness to beyond-design basis ac- cidents. 3. TODAY STATUS OF NUCLEAR INDUSTRY 3.1. Organizational structure of Electric energy division of State Corporation ROSATOM. 3.2. Main strategic tasks: · unconditional priority of safety; · assuring protection of personnel, public and environment; · increase in electric power output and share of nuclear power genera- tion; · improvement of NPP operation efficiency; · development of international activities; · improvement of efficiency of NPP engineering and capital invest- ment into construction. 4. LOOK INTO THE FUTURE: 4.3. New power units commissioning: designs VVER-1200 (AES-2006), VVER-1500, and VVER-TOI. 4 4.4. Closing nuclear fuel cycle basing on power units of type BN-1200, VVER-TOI with MOX-fuel. 4.5. Implementation of projects for construction of NPP of small and medium capacity. 4.6. NPP units decommissioning. NUCLEAR POWER COMPLEX OF RUSSIA: SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY Asmolov V.G. Rosenergoatom Concern JSC To the requirements to large-scale nuclear power complex (NPC) of Russia are both traditional: · guaranteed safety · economic efficiency and systematic, ensuring its long-term staying in demand: · By the size of power generation the share of nuclear power in electric power market in the country should not be less than 30%. · By export potential the volume of nuclear power technologies export (when meeting the requirement of sensitive materials and technologies non- dissemination) should be comparable to the volume of its domestic use. · By the structure of power generation NPC should provide for the possibility to expand sales markets, i.e. to ensure thermal power generation for both electric power generation and “non-electric” applications: heating, water desalination, hydrogen and motor fuel manufacture, new technological appliances. · By raw material base NPC shouldn’t be limited for the historically sig- nificant period of time (hundreds of years). · By RAW management arrangement of the NPC fuel cycle should provide for safe and final isolation of RAW. Nuclear power development principles implementation makes for the exact objectives that can be put as follows: · in short-term prospect: - power capacity build-up to achieve NP share in overall electric power generation in the country by at least 25% by 2030 to create the invest- ment basis for development, - investigation of demands and ways of development of regional nuclear power industry on the basis of NPP with small and medium capacity reactors, - ensuring growth in nuclear technologies export at the level comparable to the one of the same technologies use inside the country, 5 - setup of basic elements of new technological platform of large-scale NPC for nuclear fuel cycle closing. · in long-term prospect: - setup and deployment of closed by Uranium and Plutonium large-scale NPC as a basis for power supply for Russia sustainable development in the third millennium. Thanks to the achieve by today results, Russia now has a high level of technological preparedness for ensuring innovative development of her nuclear power industry. The level of this preparedness is determined by the following parameters. By reactor technologies: · There was developed an evolutionary design AES-2006 with VVER 1200 reactor for mass construction of NPPs in short-term prospect. · At pilot operation level there were successfully demonstrated sodium cooled fast neutron reactors – BN-800 power unit is at the stage of com- missioning, there was started the programme of its 100% loading with MOX-fuel and its use for mastering pilot technologies of closed nuclear fuel cycle. · At various stages of completion there are developmental works for new de- signs of sodium cooled fast neutron reactors of high capacity, fast reactors with heavy metals, and some projects for small and medium size reactors. By closed nuclear fuel cycle technologies (NFC): · At industrial level there was demonstrated a technology of water chemi- cal treatment of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) of Uranium reactors, with Plutonium discharge and glassing of highly radioactive waste (RAW) (plant RT-1). · At pilot operation level there were demonstrated pellet and vibro- tech- nologies for mixed Uranium-Plutonium oxide fuel (MOX-fuel) of sodium cooled fast neutron reactors. · R&D works were started for development of alternative technologies of NP fuel cycle with fast reactors (nitride fuel, SNF reprocessing dry meth- ods, transmutation of minor actinides (MA) in fast reactors; elements of Uranium – Thorium cycle). · There are being considered the concepts of hybrid accelerating-manage- ment facilities and molten salt reactors for the purpose of long-life RAW burning-out. By technologies of nuclear power sources for “non-electric” applications: · At pilot operation level there was demonstrated the possibility to use sodium cooled fast reactors (BN) for water desalination (BN-350), and also thermal reactors for regional heat supply (Bilibino NPP). · At various stages of development there are technologies of power genera- tion for “non-electric” and mixed application, and projects on promising nuclear power facilities for these technologies implementation, includ- 6 ing facilities of transport and space energy complex, heat supply, water desalination, coal gasification, and hydrogen production. Basing on this status Russian nuclear industry shall now start its systemic development to achieve the set short-term and long-term goals – creation of double-component nuclear power complex with thermal and fast reactors operating in closed fuel cycle. NEW APPROACHES TO DESIGNING NUCLEAR POWER UNITS Ivanov Yu.A., Alenkov V.V. United Company NIAEP JSC – ASE JSC The important integral part of successful implementation of NPP con- struction project is effective project information management and data transfer in the required scope and format in-between the stages of NPP lifecycle. Information effective management under the project is achieved through organization of work of all participants to the project in common informational space ensuring data exchange between them, their interaction between themselves and with the project Customer, project management, processes of data management relating to equipment, procurement, sup- plies, Project documentation management, construction-and-erection and commissioning works. Works in common informational space (CIS) are based on NPP design informational model developed at the stages of design and engineering docu- mentation issue. All data under the project at power unit engineering and construction stages (including NPP 3D-models, documents, data bases) are gathered in unified system of project information management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's Nuclear Security Policy
    Innovative approaches to peace and security from the Stanley Foundation POLICYANALYSISBRIEF THE STANLEY FOUNDATION | MAY 2015 Russia’s Nuclear Security Policy: Priorities and Potential Areas for Cooperation The crisis over Ukraine has led to a drastic reduction in regular official Russian-US contacts in most areas, including those where it is in the two countries’ mutual national security interests to work together. Bilateral cooperation on nuclear nonproliferation and nuclear security has been among the affected areas. The United States has suspended contacts with Russia in the framework of the G-8 and in the Russian-US Bilateral Presidential Commission’s Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Security Working Group. Implementation of the September 2013 agreement on Cooperation in Nuclear- and Energy- Related Scientific Research and Development (R&D Agreement), which Anton Khlopkov prioritizes joint efforts on nuclear nonproliferation and nuclear security, has also been put on hold, and exchanges between nuclear scientists of the two Author countries have been frozen. In turn, Russia has decided not to take part in Anton Khlopkov1 is director of the preparations for the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit. Moscow also notified Moscow-based Center for Energy and Washington that most of the joint nuclear security projects in Russia would Security Studies and editor in chief of the not be extended beyond December 31, 2014. journal Nuclear Club. He is a member of the Advisory Board under the Security This trend is a serious cause for concern, given that Russia and the United Council of the Russian Federation and States, which are depositaries of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of chairman of the Moscow Nonproliferation Nuclear Weapons (NPT), bear special responsibility for maintaining the Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrity of Reactor Pressure Vessels in Nuclear Power Plants: Assessment of Irradiation Embrittlement Effects in Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels No
    156 pages, 9mm IAEA Nuclear Energy Series IAEA Nuclear No. No. NP-T-3.11 No. No. Steels Vessel Pressure Reactor in Effects Embrittlement Irradiation of Assessment Plants: Power Nuclear in Vessels Pressure Reactor of Integrity IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NP-T-3.11 Basic Integrity of Reactor Principles Pressure Vessels in Nuclear Power Plants: Objectives Assessment of Irradiation Embrittlement Guides Effects in Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels Technical Reports INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA ISBN 978–92–0–101709–3 ISSN 1995–7807 P1382_covI-IV.indd 1 2009-05-05 11:14:48 INTEGRITY OF REACTOR PRESSURE VESSELS IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: ASSESSMENT OF IRRADIATION EMBRITTLEMENT EFFECTS IN REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL STEELS The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GUATEMALA OMAN ALBANIA HAITI PAKISTAN ALGERIA HOLY SEE PALAU ANGOLA HONDURAS PANAMA ARGENTINA HUNGARY PARAGUAY ARMENIA ICELAND PERU AUSTRALIA INDIA PHILIPPINES AUSTRIA INDONESIA POLAND AZERBAIJAN IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PORTUGAL BANGLADESH IRAQ QATAR BELARUS IRELAND REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BELGIUM ISRAEL ROMANIA BELIZE ITALY RUSSIAN FEDERATION BENIN JAMAICA SAUDI ARABIA BOLIVIA JAPAN SENEGAL BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JORDAN SERBIA BOTSWANA KAZAKHSTAN SEYCHELLES BRAZIL KENYA SIERRA LEONE BULGARIA KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE BURKINA FASO KUWAIT SLOVAKIA CAMEROON KYRGYZSTAN SLOVENIA CANADA LATVIA SOUTH AFRICA CENTRAL AFRICAN LEBANON SPAIN REPUBLIC LIBERIA SRI LANKA CHAD LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA SUDAN CHILE LIECHTENSTEIN SWEDEN CHINA LITHUANIA
    [Show full text]
  • E-Mail: [email protected]
    ATOMENERGOMASH JSC Nuclear and Power Engineering Address: 28/3 Ozerkovsakaya nab., Moscow, 115184 Telephone: +7(495) 668-20-93 Fax: +7(495) 668-20-95 Website: http://www.aem-group.ru/en/ E-mail: [email protected] www.aem-group.ru/en/ 3 JSC Atomenergomash ABOUT US Аtomenergomash JSC (AEM, Сompany, Group) is a machine building division of ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corporation. One of the leading Russian power engineering companies, a supplier of efficient integrated solutions for nuclear and thermal power plants, natural gas and petrochemical industry, shipbuilding, hydroelectricity, demineralization, water treatment, water purification and special steel market. FIGURES AND FACTS ATOMENERGOMASH • The key developer and equipment manu- • AEM was established in 2006 as part of facturer for the reactor facility of the ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corporation. water-water energetic reactor (VVER). • The Holding includes about 20 • The key developer and equipement man- power engineering companies, R&D, ufacturer of fast nuclear reactors (FNR). manufacturing, construction and • Equipment manufacturer for the turbine construction companies located in Russia, island of NPP with VVER. Ukraine, the Czech Republic, and Hungary. • The only Russian manufacturer of steam • The Holding’s equipment is installed in generators and main circulation pumps more than 20 countries. for Russian-built NPPs. • 14% of global Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) • The key developer and manufacturer of and 40% of Thermal Power Plants (TPP) marine reactor plants for the Navy and in Russia and the former Soviet Union nuclear icebreakers. countries run our equipment. • One of the largest manufacturers of power plant boilers and Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) for medium and large Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) units.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of JSC Atomenergomash
    JSC ATOMENERGOMASH 2016 INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT ar2016.aem-group.ru JSC Atomenergomash provides access to the integrated interactive version of the annual report for 2016 for its stakeholders. This product allows easy information presentation of the main annual results of the Company, as well as the access to additional data, which was not included in the print version in a analysis-friendly format. i – Links to online version GRI – GRI indicators Approved by the Board of Directors on May 26, 2017 Preliminarily approved by the Chief Executive Officer on May 19, 2017 Chief Executive Officer Andrey Nikipelov JSC ATOMENERGOMASH THE COMPANY IN BRIEF Contents 10 YEARS OF PROGRESS ............................................................................................................................4 THE COMPANY IN BRIEF ..............................................................................................................................6 6. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ...................................................................................................................66 2016 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................................8 6.1. Ecological management ................................................................................................................................................................................................66 6.2. Emissions and Wastes .....................................................................................................................................................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • Small Modular Reactor Design and Deployment
    INL/MIS-15-34247 Small Modular Reactor Design and Deployment Curtis Wright Symposium xx/xx/xxxx www.inl.gov INL SMR Activities • INL works with all vendors to provide fair access to the laboratory benefits • INL works with industry on SMR technology and deployment • INL is supporting multiple LWR SMR vendors – Small, <300MWe reactors and less expensive reactors compared to current LWR reactors (Small) – Often, but not always, multiple reactors at the same site that can be deployed as power is needed (Modular) – Primary cooling system and reactor core in a single containment structure, but not always (Reactors) – Factory built, usually, which improves quality and costs • Integrated PWR SMR’s are closest to deployment – designed to be inherently safer and simple – primary reactor system inside a single factory built containment vessel – Higher dependence on passive systems to simplify operation and design Reactor Power Nuclear Plant Power Los Angeles Class Submarine -26 MW 5000 Enterprise Class Aircraft Carrier 8x 4000 Unit Power Nimitz Class Aircraft Carrier 2x97MW, 194MW 3000 Plant Power NuScale Reactor 12 x 150MW, 1800MW 2000 Cooper BWR, 1743MW PowerThermal MW 1000 Westinghouse AP-1000, 3000MW 0 European Pressurized Reactor, 4953MW SMRs are Smaller VC Summer • Power less than 300MWe. Dearater – Current Plants 1000MWe – Physically smaller – Fewer inputs – Fits on power grid with less infrastructure – Built in a factory – Simplified designs VC Summer • Passive systems Core • Fewer components NuScale Reactor Multiple Units • SMR Nuclear
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report JSC CONCERN ROSENERGOATOM for 2009
    Annual Report JSC CONCERN ROSENERGOATOM FOR 2009 Safety Effi ciency Responsibility Safety Effi ciency Responsibility JSC Concern Rosenergoatom Annual report for 2009 Content I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Preamble 7 1.1. On the Annual Report 7 2. Statements of top management of Rosenergoatom 8 2.1. Statement of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rosenergoatom 8 2.2. Statement of the General Director of Rosenergoatom 9 3. General information on Rosenergoatom 10 4. Key corporate events in 2009 11 5. Mission of Rosenergoatom 13 6. Management 13 6.1. Management structure 13 6.2. Management methods and corporate policy 24 II. CORE BUSINESS 7. Strategy 29 7.1. Positions of Rosenergoatom within the industry 29 7.2. Strategy of Rosenergoatom 30 7.3. Rosenergoatom’s medium-term development objectives and tasks (2009–2011) 30 7.4. Key performance indicators of Rosenergoatom 31 7.5. Key risks associated with Rosenergoatom’s operations 31 8. Rosenergoatom. Facts and fi gures 32 8.1. Generating capacities of Rosenergoatom 34 8.2. Electricity generation at Russian NPPs 44 8.3. Maintenance and repairs 45 8.4. Lifetime extension of NPP units 46 8.5. Production growth program 46 8.6. Construction of new power units 47 9. Priority areas of operations of Rosenergoatom 49 9.1. Production and marketing activities of Rosenergoatom 49 9.2. Investments 50 9.3. Innovation and competitive growth 50 III. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY 10. Safety 53 10.1. Safety indicators 53 10.2. Ensuring nuclear and radiation safety and non-proliferation of nuclear materials 55 4 JSC Concern Rosenergoatom 10.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications Report Prepared for Alberta Innovates
    PNNL-25978 Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications Report Prepared for Alberta Innovates November 2016 SM Short B Olateju (AI) SD Unwin S Singh (AI) A Meisen (AI) DISCLAIMER NOTICE This report was prepared under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), as an account of work sponsored by Alberta Innovates (“AI”). Neither AI, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), DOE, the U.S. Government, nor any person acting on their behalf makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by AI, PNNL, DOE, or the U.S. Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of AI, PNNL, DOE or the U.S. Government. Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications SM Short B Olateju (AI) SD Unwin S Singh (AI) A Meisen (AI) November 2016 Prepared for Alberta Innovates (AI) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Executive Summary At present, the steam requirements of Alberta’s heavy oil industry and the Province’s electricity requirements are predominantly met by natural gas and coal, respectively. On November 22, 2015 the Government of Alberta announced its Climate Change Leadership Plan to 1) phase out all pollution created by burning coal and transition to more renewable energy and natural gas generation by 2030 and 2) limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from oil sands operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Passive Safety Injection System Design and Simulation for Small Scale Pressurized Water Reactor
    Passive Safety Injection System Design and Simulation for Small Scale Pressurized Water Reactor Muhammad Tahir A dissertation submitted for the degree of “Doctor of Philosophy” (PhD) in Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences Islamabad Pakistan May 2011 Declaration I declare that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree in this or in any other university. Signature: __________________________ Author’s Name: (Muhammad Tahir) Supervisor Dr. Imran Rafiq Chughtai Principal Engineer Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences [PIEAS] Islamabad, Pakistan. Head, DNE, PIEAS 2 Acknowledgements All praises and thanks to God, the most Merciful, Compassionate, Gracious and Beneficent who has created man and is a source of knowledge and wisdom. At the very outset, I am thankful to my supervisors, Dr. Imran Rafiq Chughtai, PE and Dr. Muhammad Aslam, CE for their supervision, technical advices throughout the investigations and preparation of this manuscript. I am greatly indebted to director Imtiaz Rabbani for his administrative guidance. I am also grateful to my professors at PIEAS especially Dr. Muhammad Aslam, Dr. Tehsin Hamid, Dr. Naseem Irfan, Dr. Mansoor Hamid Inayat, Dr. Nasir Majid Mirza, Dr. Sikandar Majid Mirza and Dr. Muhammad Tufail. I am thankful to Dr. Muhammad Arfin Khan for his assistance in visiting Texas Tech University USA and guidance in educational and research activities. I am also grateful to my friends and colleagues who ensured a creative and good working environment and helped me in technical and non-technical matters.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Integrated Annual Report Jsc Atomenergomash Capacity Building
    Capacity building 2014 INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT Short version 2014 INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT JSC ATOMENERGOMASH CAPACITY BUILDING THE COMPANY IN BRIEF ............................................................................ 2 2014 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS ........................................................... 3 KEY EVENTS IN 2014 ................................................................................... 4 MESSAGE FROM COMPANY MANAGEMENT ............................................. 6 BUSINESS MODEL .................................................................................... 12 BUSINESS GEOGRAPHY ........................................................................... 16 KEY PROJECTS .......................................................................................... 18 STRATEGIC VISION AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................... 19 ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE .................................................................... 20 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 22 INNOVATION ACTIVITIES .......................................................................... 23 ar2014.aem-group.ru RESULTS OF PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES .................................................. 24 OPTIMIZATION OF PRODUCTION PROCESSES ....................................... 25 JSC Atomenergomash provides access to the integrated interactive ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ....................................................................... 26 version of the annual
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Industry
    JSC ATOMENERGOMASH RESULTS OF 20161 1 The brochure data are valid as of April 26, 2017. JSC ATOMENERGOMASH RESULTS OF 2016 The pilot fast neutron reactor After a long interruption, JSC Atomenergomash with primary sodium CEFR the nuclear industry equipment reinforces the key 3,668 developed under the order manufacture was resumed at business areas – nuclear from Chinese Nuclear Power “Atommash” plant. In particular, power industry, gas and Corporation. The developer the activities were commenced petrochemical industry, of the reactor plant was for the manufacture of the main shipbuilding and general 10 YEARS OF PROGRESS OJSC Afrikantov OKBM, the equipment of the reactor island industry. steam generator developer of the Power units 1 and 2 of was OJSC OKB GIDROPRESS. Belarusian NPP. THE HISTORY OF JSC ATOMENERGOMASH, THE mechanical ENGINEERING DIVISION OF ROSATOM STATE CORPORATION (THE «DIVISION») STARTED FROM TWO 2,947 OJSC Atomenergomash The complete cycle of steam COMPANIES. TODAY THE DIVISION IS ONE OF THE LEADING mechanical ENGINEERING COMPANIES IN RUSSIA. IT COMPRISES OVER 20 LEADING ENGINEERING manufactured a core catcher generators manufacture was at the Atommash plant in mastered – from semi-products JSC TsKBM completed the BUREAUS, MAJOR MACHINE BUILDERS, RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS. THE DIVISION IS INVOLVED IN THE KEY PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED BY ROSATOM, WIDENS unprecedentedly short time (PJSC Energomashspetsstal) to test of the new MCP design – and supplied it to the Baltic body manufacture (OJSC PZM), single-shaft configuration 2,414 Labor productivity per employee, thousand rubles THE COMPETENCES AND ACTIVELY MASTERS NEW MARKETS AND TECHNOLOGIES. 2,397 NPP. assembly of in-vessel components with water cooling of motor and shipment to client and bearing assemblies that (OJSC ZiO-Podolsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Programme [Pdf, 568
    Joint Stock Company «Russian concern for production of electric and thermal energy at nuclear power plants» (Rosenergoatom Concern JSC) ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CONFERENCE “SAFETY, EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMICS OF NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY” (MNTK-2018) CONFERENCE PROGRAMME Moscow, May 23–24, 2018 OVERALL SCHEDULE AND TIMING May 23rd (1st Day) Participants registration (Conference hall lobby). с 0800 до 0900 Opening (Conference hall) . с 0900 до 0920 Plenary session (Conference hall) . с 0920 до 1200 Section session (the allocated rooms) . с 1400 до 1800 Exhibition of nuclear enterprises & organizations (Building 2 lobby) . с 1400 до 1800 Official dinner . с 1830 до 2100 May 24th (2nd Day) Section sessions, cont’d (the allocated rooms) . с 0900 до 1400 Exhibition of nuclear enterprises & organizations, cont’d (Building 2 lobby) . с 0900 до 1400 Plenary session – Summing up and Closing (Conference hall) . с 1430 до 1530 Timing Presentations at the plenary session: 25 to 30 min Presentations at the section sessions: 15 to 30 min including Q&A 2 CONTENTS CONFERENCE TOPICS. 5 PLENARY SESSION. 10 SECTION PROGRAMMES SECTION 1. SAFE AND EFFECTIVE OPERATION OF NPPS . 11 1.1. Operation, maintenance and repair of NPPs with VVER, RBMK, BN and EGP-6 reactors . 11 1.1.1. Operation of NPPs with VVER reactors . 11 1.1.2. Operation of NPPs with RBMK, BN and EGP-6 reactors. 13 1.1.3. Maintenance & repair and installation of NPP equipment . 15 1.2. Engineering support to NPP operations . 17 1.2.1. Equipment life management and nuclear power units lifetime extension . .17 1.2.2. Enhancement of electric equipment reliability .
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS Back to Contents
    NEWSLETTER #8 (244) AUGUST 2021 CONTENTS Back to contents ROSATOM NEWS TRENDS Kudankulam, High Five! Nuclear Technology Saves Lives Arctic Sea Lane ROSATOM GEOGRAPHY Russian Atom Reaches New Heights NEWSLETTER #8 (244) AUGUST 2021 ROSATOM NEWS Back to contents Представители ТВЭЛ, ENUSA, ENSA и IDOM подписывают меморандум we are prepared to launch mass Kudankulam, construction of Russian- designed power units with the state-of-the-art Generation High Five! III+ reactors at other sites in India. This possibility is stipulated in our existing Construction of Kudankulam Unit 5 agreements,” Director General of Rosatom has been officially kicked off. This is Alexey Likhachev said at the ceremony. the third stage of the Indian nuclear project carried out by Rosatom. Kudankulam profile The ceremony of pouring the first concrete for the basemat of Kudankulam Unit 5 The fifth power unit is constructed within located in the same-name town in the Indian the framework of a Russian- Indian treaty state of Tamil Nadu was held on June 29. signed in November 1988 and amended in June 1998. Since then, Rosatom has “The nuclear construction project in constructed and put in operation two power Kudankulam has been a symbol of close units of the Kudankulam Nuclear Power collaboration between Russia and India Plant. The first of them was connected to for many years. But it is not the time to the Indian national power grid in October rest — Rosatom possesses all the most 2013, followed by the other in August 2016. advanced nuclear energy technologies. In The two units have VVER-1000 reactors, the a partnership with our Indian colleagues, most powerful in India.
    [Show full text]