DOCSLIB.ORG

Delegation to the EU-Armenia and EU-Azerbaijan Parliamentary List of Members Cooperation Committees and the EU-Georgia Parliamentary Association Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delegation to the EU-Armenia and EU-Azerbaijan Parliamentary List of Members Cooperation Committees and the EU-Georgia Parliamentary Association Committee Delegation to the EU-Armenia and EU-Azerbaijan Parliamentary List of members Cooperation Committees and the EU-Georgia Parliamentary Association Committee Members Sajjad KARIM Chair European Conservatives and Reformists Group United Kingdom Conservative Party Elisabeth KÖSTINGER Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Austria Österreichische Volkspartei Antanas GUOGA Vice-Chair Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Lithuania Lietuvos Respublikos liberalų sąjūdis Lorenzo CESA Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Italy Nuovo Centrodestra - Unione di Centro Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands Damian DRĂGHICI Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Romania Uniunea Națională pentru Progresul României Heidi HAUTALA Member Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Finland Vihreä liitto Iris HOFFMANN Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Germany Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands 20/04/2016 1 Robert Jarosław IWASZKIEWICZ Member Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group Poland KORWiN Kateřina KONEČNÁ Member Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left Czech Republic Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy Iskra MIHAYLOVA Member Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Bulgaria Movement for Rights and Freedoms Clare MOODY Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament United Kingdom Labour Party Rolandas PAKSAS Member Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group Lithuania Partija Tvarka ir teisingumas Georgi PIRINSKI Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Bulgaria Bulgarian Socialist Party Monika SMOLKOVÁ Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Slovakia SMER-Sociálna demokracia Jaromír ŠTĚTINA Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Czech Republic TOP 09 a Starostové Traian UNGUREANU Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Romania Partidul Naţional Liberal Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group Poland Prawo i Sprawiedliwość 20/04/2016 2 Substitutes Laura AGEA Substitute Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group Italy Movimento 5 Stelle Nikolay BAREKOV Substitute European Conservatives and Reformists Group Bulgaria Bulgaria without Censorship Dita CHARANZOVÁ Substitute Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Czech Republic ANO 2011 Nikolaos CHOUNTIS Substitute Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left Greece Popular Unity Andi CRISTEA Substitute Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Romania Partidul Social Democrat Miriam DALLI Substitute Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Malta Partit Laburista Martina DLABAJOVÁ Substitute Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Czech Republic ANO 2011 Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT Substitute Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Spain Partido Popular András GYÜRK Substitute Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Hungary Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség-Keresztény Demokrata Néppárt Gunnar HÖKMARK Substitute Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Sweden Moderaterna Marc JOULAUD Substitute Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) France Les Républicains 20/04/2016 3 Krišjānis KARIŅŠ Substitute Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Latvia Partija "VIENOTĪBA" Notis MARIAS Substitute European Conservatives and Reformists Group Greece Independent Susanne MELIOR Substitute Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Germany Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands Tamás MESZERICS Substitute Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Hungary Lehet Más A Politika Sergei STANISHEV Substitute Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Bulgaria Bulgarian Socialist Party Boris ZALA Substitute Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Slovakia SMER-Sociálna demokracia Source : © European Union, 2016 - EP 20/04/2016 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • En En Amendments
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 2016/0133(COD) 4.4.2017 AMENDMENTS 535 - 771 Draft report Cecilia Wikström (PE599.751v02-00) Establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast) Proposal for a regulation (COM(2016)0270 – C8-0173/2016 – 2016/0133(COD)) AM\1122581EN.docx PE602.908v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_LegReport PE602.908v01-00 2/151 AM\1122581EN.docx EN Amendment 535 Elly Schlein, Sylvie Guillaume, Josef Weidenholzer, Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Miltiadis Kyrkos, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Ana Gomes, Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Kati Piri, Miriam Dalli, Péter Niedermüller Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 1. The criteria for determining the 1. The criteria for determining the Member State responsible shall be applied Member State responsible shall be applied only once, in the order in which they are in the order in which they are set out in set out in this Chapter. Chapter III, IV and VII of this Regulation. Or. en Justification In order to be coherent with the Resolution on the situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration approved by the Parliament in April 2016, and with the Resolution on migration and refugees in Europe approved in September 2015, the shadow rapporteur is proposing a centralised, permanent and automatic mechanism of fair distribution of responsibilities among Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read the Newsletter
    EPILEPSY ALLIANCE EUROPE NEWS FROM THE TASK FORCE CHAIRS under the auspices of: ® EA E International Bureau for APRIL 2018 Epilepsy Alliance Europe IBE Epilepsy Meet the members of the Task Force 2017-2021 Martin Brodie, Co-chair representing IBE Philippe Ryvlin, Co-chair representing ILAE Janet Mifsud, representing IBE Caroline Morton, representing IBE Francesca Sofia, representing IBE Lievan Lagae, representing ILAE Eugen Trinka, representing ILAE Kristl Vonck, representing ILAE FIND OUT MORE www.epilepsyallianceeurope.org/epilepsy-alliance-europe-task-force/ INTERNATIONAL EPILEPSY DAY IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Philippe Ryvlin and Martin Brodie, Co-chair, Epilepsy Alliance Europe Task Force A global alliance for epilepsy The European Advocates for Epilepsy MEP group in the European In opening the briefing, Brian Hayes MEP explained that the work- Parliament, organised a Breakfast Briefing in the parliament in Brus- shop focused on the need for a global alliance for epilepsy research sels on 31st January to mark International Epilepsy and was a follow up to an important workshop held Day. Hosted by its President, Brian Hayes MEP (Ire- in 2017 and which involved representatives from land), the event was attended by several MEPs, Epilepsy is a the national health agencies in the US and Canada. including Mrs Lieve Wierlinck (Belgium), Seán Kelly most complex Speaking at the event, Francesca Sofia, the mother (Ireland), Alojz Peterle (Slovenia), Roberta Metsola of an eight-year old girl with difficult refractory epi- (Malta), José Inácio Faria (Portugal), and Franc disease. lepsy, said: “My plea to you today is to work with us Bogovič (Slovenia). in a life-changing movement to save a community Also present were Stéphane Hogan, Head of Sec- Fighting of 6 million people (with epilepsy).
    [Show full text]
  • Dear President of the European Parliament, Dear President of The
    Dear President of the European Parliament, Dear President of the European Council, Dear President of the European Commission and Dear President of the French Republic, We all have a responsibility for the shared future of Europe. In this time of crisis, it is high time to re-evaluate some of the rules we have upheld till now and focus on the most important aspects of the European project, which will help us move forward. An unprecedented health crisis is currently affecting millions of people in Europe and tragically taking thousands of lives. However, this is not the end. The economic crisis will crush the hopes and dreams of generations of Europeans. We sincerely hope that we will all do whatever is in our power not to leave anyone behind. We firmly believe that the European Parliament needs to take on its responsibility and share the burden since it is the highest European directly elected body. We need to be part of the solution, not part of the problem. If we want the people to have confidence and trust in the European project, we need to show them that we are also ready to make concessions. Therefore, we would like to ask you to do everything in your power to change the treaties in order to have just a single seat of the Parliament in Brussels. This call has again gained a large majority of support in the 2018 Parliament discharge resolution adopted on 13 May 2020 and shall now be taken into account and acted upon. The financial and environmental costs of moving the Parliament are, especially in these times of digitally connected Europe, extremely high and hard to justify.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2014 - 2019
    European Parliament 2014 - 2019 Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Version 19 May 2017 FINAL VOTING LIST Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 for a resilient Energy Union and to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement and amending Regulation No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council on a mechanism for monitoring and reporting greenhouse gas emissions and other information relevant to climate changes (2016/0231 (COD)) PR – PE592.423 v02-00 + AM – PE599.569 v01-00 + AM – 599.594 v01-00 + AD TRAN + AD ITRE + AD AGRI Rapporteur: Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy Articles AM Tabled by Comment Rapp Vote Title, Article COMP A EPP, S&D, If adopted, AMs 1, + 1 - subpara (Objective ECR, ALDE, 2, 4, 6, 8 1a+b(new), and long- GUE/NGL, (corresponding Article term GREENS/EFA, part: “and from 4a(new), ambition) EFDD Recitals 3, 2031 to 2050”), 13, 4a(new), 18, 38-42, 57, 58, 9a(new), 104-106, 107 (1st 10b(new), part), 108-111, 143- Recital 20 145, 264, ITRE 3, ITRE 15-16, TRAN 1, TRAN 12-13, AGRI 3-4 and AGRI 14 fall. Title AM 1 Rapporteur Falls if COMP A + adopted. 1 Articles AM Tabled by Comment Rapp Vote Article 1 – AM 105 Eleonora Evi, Falls if COMP A - paragraph 1 Dario adopted. Tamburrano, Piernicola Pedicini TRAN 12 Falls if COMP A or - 105 adopted ITRE 16 Falls if COMP A, - 105 or TRAN 12 adopted AM 104 Merja Kyllönen, Falls if COMP A, + Katerina 105, TRAN 12 or Konecná ITRE 16 adopted AM 106 Pilar Ayuso, Falls if COMP A - Michel Dantin adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • Parlament Europejski
    26.3.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 107/1 Poniedziałek, 16 września 2019 r. IV (Informacje) INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ PARLAMENT EUROPEJSKI SESJA 2019-2020 Posiedzenia od 16 do 19 września 2019 r. STRASBURG PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 16 WRZEŚNIA 2019 R. (2021/C 107/01) Spis treści Strona 1. Wznowienie sesji . 3 2. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 3 3. In Memoriam . 3 4. Oświadczenie Przewodniczącego . 3 5. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 3 6. Skład Parlamentu . 4 7. Weryfikacja mandatów . 4 8. Skład komisji i delegacji . 4 9. Sprostowania (art. 241 Regulaminu) . 5 10. Negocjacje przed pierwszym czytaniem w Radzie (art. 72 Regulaminu) . 6 C 107/2 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 26.3.2021 Poniedziałek, 16 września 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 11. Komunikat Przewodniczącego — Wybór Europejskiego Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich . 6 12. Składanie dokumentów . 7 13. Działania podjęte w związku ze stanowiskami i rezolucjami Parlamentu . 9 14. Pytania wymagające odpowiedzi ustnej (składanie dokumentów) . 9 15. Porządek obrad . 9 16. Stan lasów w UE (debata) . 11 17. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (debata) . 11 18. Sytuacja w Hongkongu (debata) . 12 19. Jednominutowe wystąpienia w ważnych kwestiach politycznych . 12 20. Porządek obrad następnego posiedzenia . 13 21. Zamknięcie posiedzenia . 13 LISTA OBECNOŚCI . 14 ZAŁĄCZNIK WYNIKI GŁOSOWAŃ IMIENNYCH . 15 1. Porządek dnia z wtorku — wniosek grup Verts/ALE i GUE/NGL . 15 2. Porządek dnia z wtorku — wniosek grup ID i GUE/NGL . 16 3. Porządek dnia ze środy — wniosek grupy PPE . 17 26.3.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 107/3 Poniedziałek, 16 września 2019 r.
    [Show full text]
  • SYRIZA, Bloco and Podemos
    Transnational networking and cooperation among neo-reformist left parties in Southern Europe during the Eurozone crisis: SYRIZA, Bloco and Podemos Vladimir Bortun The thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Portsmouth. March 2019 Abstract European parties to the left of social democracy have always lagged behind the main political families in terms of transnational cooperation at the level of the EU. However, the markedly transnational character of the Eurozone crisis and of the management of that crisis has arguably provided a uniquely propitious context for these parties to reduce that gap. This research project aims to establish whether they achieved that by focusing on three parties that were particularly prone to seeking an increase in their transnational cooperation: SYRIZA from Greece, Bloco de Esquerda from Portugal and Podemos from Spain. For these parties not only come from the member states most affected by the crisis, both economically and politically, but they also share several programmatic and strategic features favouring such an increase. By using a mix of document analysis, semi-structured interviews and non-participatory observation, the thesis discusses both the informal and formal transnational networking and cooperation among the three parties. This discussion reveals four key findings, with potentially useful insights for wider transnational party cooperation that are to be pursued in future research. Firstly, the transnational networking and cooperation among SYRIZA, Bloco and Podemos did increase at some point during the crisis, particularly around SYRIZA’s electoral victory in January 2015. Secondly, since the U-turn of that government in July 2015, SYRIZA’s relationship with both Bloco and Podemos has declined significantly, as reflected in their diverging views of the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimitra PANAGIOTATOU, Phd Candidate D.Panagiotatou@Qmul
    Dimitra PANAGIOTATOU, PhD Candidate [email protected] Queen Mary University of London School of Business and Management Supervisors: Professor Martin Laffin, and Senior Lecturer Dr. Stella Ladi May 2017 Short Paper prepared for the 8th Biennial Hellenic Observatory PhD Symposium on Contemporary Greece and Cyprus European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science July 1st 2017 PhD Thesis Title: Investigating the correlation between the practice of EU Cohesion Policy and Euroscepticism: An exploratory qualitative analysis of selected EU regions PhD Thesis/Paper Abstract: The aim of the doctoral project consists in investigating whether and at which extent the practice of EU Cohesion Policy has inadvertently impacted upon the centrifugal forces and Eurosceptic dynamics observed in the EU, by focusing in particular on why the policy has not managed to create lasting positive images about the Union and thus contribute to the development and diffusion of the EU identity. Drawing from and aspiring to contribute to the literatures on Europeanization, Euroscepticism and Public Policy, the project explores the perceptions of supranational, national and sub-national elites about EU Cohesion Policy and the extent at which different strategies and organizational/operational modalities at national and sub- national levels influence the efficient implementation thereof. The methodological framework consists in exploratory qualitative case-study research of selected EU regions in Greece, the United Kingdom and Poland, whereas data and findings collated during elite interviews are interpreted through the lens of discourse analysis. The paper submitted to the Symposium represents a section of the literature review and some preliminary theoretical considerations relating to Euroscepticism.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members of the European Parliament, 2014–2019
    List of members of the European Parliament, 2014–2019 Below is a list of Members of the European Parliament serving in the eighth term (2014–2019). It is sorted by an English perception of surname treating all variations of de/di/do, van/von, Ó/Ní, and so forth as part of the collation key, even if this is not the normal practice in a member's own country. During the 2014–19 term, there are 751 members of parliament divided among the 28 member states. Contents List of members Austria Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Results of the election: Finland GUE/NGL G-EFA EPP EFDD France S&D ALDE ECR NI Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom Members of the European Parliament who are also citizen of a non-EU country Notes See also List of members Austria On the Austrian People's Party list: (EPP Group) On the Freedom Party list: (Non-inscrits, since 15 June 2015 ENF) 1. Othmar Karas 2. Elisabeth Köstinger – until 8 November 1. Harald Vilimsky 2017[1] 2. Franz Obermayr Lukas Mandl – since 30 November 2017 3. Georg Mayer 3. Paul Rübig 4. Barbara Kappel 4. Claudia Schmidt On The Greens – The Green Alternative list: (Greens- 5. Heinz K. Becker EFA) On the Social Democratic Party of Austria list: (S&D) 1. Ulrike Lunacek – until 8 November 2017[3] 1. Eugen Freund Thomas Waitz – since 10 November 2017 2. Evelyn Regner 2. Michel Reimon 3. Jörg Leichtfried – until 23 June 2015[2] 3.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Pdf File
    1 Interview with Eric Toussaint, spokesperson and co-founder of the international network of the Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt INTRO (CADTM). Interview by Benjamin Lemoine. This interview presents the genealogy From Africa to Latin America, citizens’ of the anti-debt struggle, the campaigns participation in audits ushers in hope. for debt cancellation, the empirical However, most of the time their purpo- foundation, the political battles and the se is lost due to the neglect of the cru- concepts of the “illegitimate”, “illegal” or saders-turned-rulers, where the rulers “odious” nature of public debt. In other have the final say vis-à-vis the financial words, how it is necessary for the Com- system. Yet, sometimes the audits are mittee for the Abolition of Illegitimate immensely successful. We review the Debt (CADTM) – formerly known as the experience of the audit of the Greek so- Committee for the Abolition of Third vereign debt, full of intrigues and unex- World Debt – to ally with opposition pected twists in which it took very little forces and social movements, where to tip the balance. When the hopeful the concepts and the people involved dream for a new international coope- can challenge and overpower debt and ration (a conference in London on the its «system” once the government hears Greek debt as requested by Alexis Tsi- their voice. Yet, for CADTM the outright pras) seems naive and where, according priority is to fortify the activities descri- to Eric Toussaint, unilateral sovereign bed below rather than lobbying. decisions are indispensable in order to reverse the balance of power.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Parliament Elections of 2019
    The European Parliament Elections of 2019 Edited by Lorenzo De Sio Mark N. Franklin Luana Russo luiss university press The European Parliament Elections of 2019 Edited by Lorenzo De Sio Mark N. Franklin Luana Russo © 2019 Luiss University Press – Pola Srl All rights reserved ISBN (print) 978-88-6105-411-0 ISBN (ebook) 978-88-6105-424-0 Luiss University Press – Pola s.r.l. viale Romania, 32 00197 Roma tel. 06 85225481/431 www.luissuniversitypress.it e-mail [email protected] Graphic design: HaunagDesign Srl Layout: Livia Pierini First published in July 2019 Table of contents Introduction Understanding the European Parliament elections of 2019 luana russo, mark n. franklin, lorenzo de sio .....................................p. 9 part i − comparative overview Chapter One Much ado about nothing? The EP elections in comparative perspective davide angelucci, luca carrieri, mark n. franklin ...............................p. 15 Chapter Two Party system change in EU countries: long-term instability and cleavage restructuring vincenzo emanuele, bruno marino ........................................................p. 29 Chapter Three Spitzenkandidaten 2.0: From experiment to routine in European elections? thomas christiansen, michael shackleton ...........................................p. 43 Chapter Four Explaining the outcome. Second-order factors still matter, but with an exceptional turnout increase lorenzo de sio, luana russo, mark n. franklin ....................................p. 57 Chapter Five Impact of issues on party performance
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]