DOCSLIB.ORG

General Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-69530-5 - The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism Edited by James Warren Index More information general index Abonuteichos 53–4 aponia 139, 158, 180, 249 Academic scepticism 5, 146, 188 application see epibole Academy 9, 14–15, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 34, Archytas 112 48, 64 Ares 225 Achilles 225 argos logos see lazy argument, the accidents see properties Aristippus of Cyrene 13 action see voluntary action Aristobulus 16, 23 Aelian 23 Ariston of Ceos 39 Aenesidemus 30 Ariston of Chios 39 Aëtius 204 Aristophanes 26 afterlife see mortality and immortality Aristotle 5, 11, 25, 30, 57, 66, 68, 69–70, Agamemnon 225, 241 73–4, 89, 106, 114, 116, 118, 127, aggregate see composition 139, 146–7, 179, 195, 212, 213, 226, agreement see convention; justice 266, 268, 270, 272, 284 Alcius 30 Aristoxenus 217 Alexander of Abonuteichos 53–4, 60 Arnobius 62 Alexandria 32, 132 arrogance 34, 261–2 Alypius 63 Artemis 24 Amafinius 39, 41 Asclepiades of Myrlea 223 Amastris 48, 53–4 Asclepius 52, 53 ambiguity 212–13 Astell, Mary 278 Anaxagoras 285 astrology 217 anger 34, 36, 51, 140, 150, 154, 213, 221, astronomy 106, 110, 234, 265, 275, 284 251, 261, 262, 275 ataraxia 105, 108, 111, 118, 122, 139, anima 131 158, 173, 177, 180, 194, 234 animals, non-human 129, 135, 137, atheism see cult; gods 144–5, 149–50, 175, 194, 202, 209, Athens 9–10, 11–12, 29, 43, 44, 48, 54, 235 190, 259 animus 131 atoms 59, 65–83, 85, 103, 108, 112, 125, Antiochus 27, 29, 30, 32 128, 133, 138, 142, 150–4, 267, 281, Antipater 20 284 anxiety 163, 234 Atticus 27–8, 44, 45 Apelles 216, 219 Augustine 47, 59, 63 Aphrodite 225 Aulis 241 apogegennemena 136 austerity 10, 16 Apollo 24 see also luxury Apollodorus ‘tyrant of the Garden’ 12, 31 Autun, mosaic 7–8 Apollophanes 30 Averroes 276 336 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-69530-5 - The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism Edited by James Warren Index More information General index 337 Bacon, Francis 269, 285 composition, composite bodies 65–83, Basilides of Tyre 31 116, 126, 150–4 Beeckman, Isaak 269, 270 convention 192, 201 belief 86, 98, 132, 203, 236 Copernicanism 273 Bentham, Jeremy 280 corpuscularism 266, 281 Bentley, Richard 282–3 see also atoms Bernier, François 277 Cos 48, 228, 230 Bithynia 53 cosmogony 116, 240 bivalence 146 cosmopolitanism 191 Boccaccio 64 Cotta 242 body 65–83, 127 cradle argument 174 human 125, 126, 130 see also hedonism, psychological see also atoms, composition Cranach the Elder 279 Boyle, Robert 266, 272, 281, 282, Crates of Mallos 226–7 284–5 Creech, Thomas 279 Braithwaite, Richard 268 criteria of truth see pathe; perception; Bromius 36 prolepsis Bruno, Giordano 268 Ctesippus 14 Brutus 44 Cudworth, Ralph 282 cult 15, 16, 20, 22–6, 241 Caesar, C. Iulius 32, 43–4, 225 see also Epicurus, portrayed as a god Calchis 20 Cynics 220, 221 calculus, hedonist 165–7, 169, 265 Cyrenaics 97, 172 Cassius 43, 44, 181 Cyzicus 26 Catius Insuber 39 causation 70, 81, 87, 110, 127, 142, 147, Damascius 60 150–4, 205, 209, 211 Damon of Oa 221 see explanation; teleology Dante 64 Cavendish, Margaret 271, 281 death 15, 34, 42, 56, 57, 123, 126, Celsus 47 138, 164, 187, 234, 236–8, 251, Chairedemus 16, 23 254, 257, 258–9, 260–1, 265, 284 Chalcis 54 see also Epicurus, death of; fear; Chaos 216, 284 mortality and immortality; character 129 symmetry argument development of 135, 142, 148–50 decision-making 34, 187 see also vice; virtue see also voluntary action; calculus, Charleton, Walter 271, 278, 280 hedonist children 27, 180, 190, 209 Demetrius of Laconia (Demetrius Christianity 46, 47, 52, 53, 60–4, 266, Lacon) 4, 31, 34, 35, 36, 38 267, 272, 275, 276, 284 Democritus 13, 57, 68, 69, 75, 80, 82, Chrysippus 52, 147–8, 199, 252 103–4, 133–5, 150–3, 266, 269, Cicero 23, 27–8, 33, 35, 36, 39, 40, 45, 270, 280 49, 63, 69, 76, 107, 146–8, 172, Descartes, René 266, 269, 272, 273, 275, 183, 188, 189, 202, 267, 281 282, 284, 285 civilization 63 desire 57, 63, 132, 139, 145, 148–9, 160, Clement of Alexandria 49, 61, 69, 90 260, 284 Colophon 12 desires, classification of 62, 167, 186 Colotes 13, 17–18, 22, 51, 152–3 determinism 52, 117, 132, 142 coming-to-be and passing-away 66, 70, see also bivalence; swerve, atomic; 78–83, 240 voluntary action © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-69530-5 - The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism Edited by James Warren Index More information 338 General index di Cosimo, Piero 279 epistemology see belief; empiricism; Diagoras 57 inference from signs; knowledge; dialectic 202 perception; prolepsis Digby, Sir Kenelm 266, 271 Erasistratus 132 Diodorus Siculus 211 Erato 224 Diogenes Laërtius 3, 12, 48, 49, 69, 106, ethics 267, 271 practical 47, 50, 51 Diogenes of Babylon 221, 224 see also decision-making; hedonism; Diogenes of Oinoanda 4, 11, 13, 39, 47, pleasure; telos 54–9, 76–7, 107, 155, 202, 206, eudaimonia 50, 57, 110, 126, 132, 138, 208–10, 211, 249 139, 169–78, 197, 221, 238, 249, Diogenianus 47, 52 260, 284 Dionysius of Alexandria 61–2 Euphronius 52 Dionysius of Halicarnassus 226 evil 240 Dionysius the Stoic 36 explanation 108, 110, 115, 120, 121, 123 disease 19, 56, 257, 259 see also therapy family see children divination 57, 73 fate see bivalence; determinism; divisibility 69, 73–5 divination; lazy argument, the dreams 102, 206 fear 57, 58, 105, 140, 150, 165, 184, 234–48, 250, 254, 265, 275 earth 114–15, 272 feelings see pathe earthquakes 105, 120, 122, festivals see cult 235, 275 flattery 34, 261 eclipse 109, 275, 283 frank speech see parrhesia economics see household management; free-will see voluntary action wealth friendship 15–16, 57, 182–91, 219 Egyptians 58 Furies 102, 205–6 eidola 101–2, 134, 206–7, 242, 269 eliminativism 71, 134, 152 Galen 252 see also properties Galileo Galilei 269 emergence 136, 150–4 Garden, The 9–10, 12, 15, 26–8, 32, 48, see also properties 107, 181, 190, 230 emotions see pathe Gassendi, Pierre 266, 270, 271, 272, Empedocles 41, 57, 256, 269 273–5, 277, 280, 284 empiricism 59, 67, 68, 111, 126, Glaucon 193 144–5 Glykon see Asclepius enargeia 85–101 gods 1, 15, 30, 34, 46, 47, 50, 51, 56, epibole 94 57, 58, 60, 62, 87, 88–92, 105, 108, Epicurus 119, 123–4, 145, 203, 208, 236–42, biography 11–14, 18 247, 254, 257, 266, 267, 270, 272, death of 12, 14, 184, 262 274, 284 house 28 grammar 216, 223 last will and testament 15, 16, 20, greed 140 181 Grotius, Hugo 279 portrayed as a god 11, 13 writings by 3, 12, 17, 57 Hadrian 48 dating by Athenian archon 19 hail 105 epigraphy 4, 48, 54–9, 107 Halley, Edmund 272 epilogismos 88, 90 happiness see eudaimonia © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-69530-5 - The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism Edited by James Warren Index More information General index 339 harm see pain Kos see Cos heavens see astronomy; meteorology kosmos 5, 58, 69, 72, 76, 81–3, 105, Hector 220 110, 266 Hedius Rufus Lollianus Avitus, L. 53 hedonism 5, 13, 46, 51, 59–60, 169–78, Lactantius 240, 267, 281 184, 244, 245, 266 Lampsacus 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 26 ethical 149, 276 language 197–215 psychological 149 origin of 198, 207–11 Heliodorus 28 see also ambiguity; naming; signifying Heliodorus the Epicurean 48 Latin 39, 41 Helmont, J. B. van 271 law 57, 191 Hephaestus 225 see also justice Heraclitus 57 lazy argument, the (argos logos) 146–8 Herculaneum 3, 25, 31, 32, 33, 48, 54 Le Grand, Antoine 278 Hermarchus 12, 14, 15, 17, 20, 26, 37, Leibniz, Gottfried 276, 281, 283 180, 184 lekta 199, 204, 205 Hermocrates 60 Leonteus 11, 12 Herodotus, recipient of letter from Lesbos see Mitylene Epicurus 20 letters 13–14, 16, 17, 18–20, 24, 57, 58, Herophilus 132 61, 62, 107 Hesiod 13, 216 Leucippus 68, 73, 266 Hobbes, Thomas 271, 275, 279, 282 library 3, 32 Homer 33, 34, 52, 220, 224–6 see also Papiri, Villa dei honour 25–6, 140, 180 lightning 105, 120, 122, 123 Horace 33, 49, 211, 279 Locke, John 274, 279 household management 34, 87, 217, love see sex and sexual desire 218–19 Lucian 46, 47, 53–4 Hume, David 278, 280 Lucilius 49 hylomorphism 268 Lucretius 3, 22, 40–3, 44–5, 46, 49, 51, 96, 99, 101, 107, 112, 114, 115, 120, ice 120, 121 121, 122, 127, 129, 131, 134, 136, Idomeneus 12, 184 138, 140, 143–6, 180, 204, 208–11, images see eidola 228, 237, 241, 249, 254, 255–9, 260, immortality see mortality and 266, 267, 268, 269, 279–80 immortality luxury 149, 159–69 inference from signs 35, 36, 88–9, Lyceum see Peripatos 93–100, 127 Lycia 54 infinity 15, 58, 66, 69, 71–2, 73, 75, see also Oinoanda 78, 81, 105, 112, 115, 128, 237, 272 magnets 122 Iphigenia 241 Manicheanism 63 Marcus Aurelius 15, 19, 46, 48, 50 Jefferson, Thomas 1 Marinus 47 Jews 58 marturesis 100, 103 Julian 59 Marx, Karl 1, 2, 280 justice 57, 58, 87, 88, 91, 179, 191–5, materialism 5, 46, 47, 51, 63, 66, 126, 132 271, 276, 278 mathematics 35–6, 106, 110 Melite Kant, Immanuel 276 Memmius, C.
Recommended publications
  • Philosophy Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:01 PM

    Philosophy Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:01 PM

    Philosophy Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:01 PM Western Pre-Socratics Fanon Heraclitus- Greek 535-475 Bayle Panta rhei Marshall Mcluhan • "Everything flows" Roman Jakobson • "No man ever steps in the same river twice" Saussure • Doctrine of flux Butler Logos Harris • "Reason" or "Argument" • "All entities come to be in accordance with the Logos" Dike eris • "Strife is justice" • Oppositional process of dissolving and generating known as strife "The Obscure" and "The Weeping Philosopher" "The path up and down are one and the same" • Theory about unity of opposites • Bow and lyre Native of Ephesus "Follow the common" "Character is fate" "Lighting steers the universe" Neitzshce said he was "eternally right" for "declaring that Being was an empty illusion" and embracing "becoming" Subject of Heideggar and Eugen Fink's lecture Fire was the origin of everything Influenced the Stoics Protagoras- Greek 490-420 BCE Most influential of the Sophists • Derided by Plato and Socrates for being mere rhetoricians "Man is the measure of all things" • Found many things to be unknowable • What is true for one person is not for another Could "make the worse case better" • Focused on persuasiveness of an argument Names a Socratic dialogue about whether virtue can be taught Pythagoras of Samos- Greek 570-495 BCE Metempsychosis • "Transmigration of souls" • Every soul is immortal and upon death enters a new body Pythagorean Theorem Pythagorean Tuning • System of musical tuning where frequency rations are on intervals based on ration 3:2 • "Pure" perfect fifth • Inspired
  • As Guest, Some Pages Are Restricted

    As Guest, Some Pages Are Restricted

    RELIG IONS ' ANCIENT AND MODERN B EDWARD GLODD au h o The Stor o Crea t o i n . Animism . y , t r of y f P B 'AMES ALLANSON PI CTON au h o f The li ion o the anth eism. y , t or Re g f Th li fAn en China . B P s G ILES LL . D . P s e Re g ions o ci t y rofes or , rofe sor f h e iv am d o Ch inese in t U n ersit o f C bri ge. B ' E H R R ISO u at Th e l i n f An i n . L Re ig o o c e t reece y AN A N , ect rer Ne vnha m C ll Camb d a u h o of Prole omm a. t o Stud o Greek v o ege, ri ge, t r g y f Rel igion . h e R H on. AMBER AL I SYED f h ud l m f His I B t t . o t e ' a C m e o slam. y , ici o itt e ’ s C un l au h o of The S it o slam and E hics o Isla m. Maje ty s Privy o ci , t r pir f I t f M i and Fe i hism . B Dr. A. C . H ADDON L u o n ag e t s y , ect rer hnolo a Ca m d e n s gt gy t bri g U iver ity .
  • Philosophical Vignettes at Lucretius' De Rerum Natura 2.1-13

    Philosophical Vignettes at Lucretius' De Rerum Natura 2.1-13

    Philosophical Vignettes at Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura 2.1-13 In a forthcoming article, Chris Eckerman offers a new interpretation of DRN 2.7-8, arguing that tenere…templa serena refers to practicing ataraxia. I am in agreement with Eckerman’s suggestion. The purpose of this talk is to consider interpretive ramifications, left unaddressed, deriving from his philological argument. I argue that Lucretius begins his proem by developing vignettes around cornerstone concepts in the Epicurean ethical doctrine. I suggest that Lucretius develops an argumentative tricolon, with two vignettes emphasizing aponia (1-2, 5-6) and one vignette emphasizing ataraxia (7-13). Scholars have already recognized that, in the proem, Lucretius develops the idea that the Epicurean life offers security (asphaleia) (cf. Konstan 2008, 32), but, since we have not recognized, until recently, that the third member of the tricolon references ataraxia, we have not recognized that Lucretius develops a tricolon dedicated specifically to reflection on aponia in the first two limbs and on ataraxia in the third. That is to say, the proem does not focus on security generally but on the security that may be had in aponia and ataraxia specifically. The first two lines provide Lucretius’ first vignette on aponia. Suave, mari magno turbantibus aequora ventis, e terra magnum alterius spectare laborem; Looking upon the great labor of another person from land when winds are upsetting the calm on the great sea is pleasant. The term laborem (2) is programmatic, for, as M. Gale (2013, 33) has shown, Lucretius uses labor and laborare to reference ‘the futile struggles of the non-Epicurean.’ Accordingly, readers, as they become familiar both with Epicurean doctrine and with Lucretius’ language, infer that the man is at sea for commercial reasons, pursuing the affluence that may result therefrom (cf.
  • Candide and Other Stories (Oxford World's Classics)

    Candide and Other Stories (Oxford World's Classics)

    oxford world’ s classics CANDIDE and other stories Voltaire was the assumed name of François-Marie Arouet (1694– 1778). Born into a well-to-do Parisian family, he was educated at the leading Jesuit college in Paris. Having refused to follow his father and elder brother into the legal profession he soon won widespread acclaim for Œdipe (1718), the first of some twenty-seven tragedies which he continued to write until the end of his life. His national epic La Henriade (1723) confirmed his reputation as the leading French literary figure of his generation. Following a quarrel with the worthless but influential aristocrat, the Chevalier de Rohan, he was forced into exile in England. This period (1726–8) was particularly formative, and his Letters concern- ing the English Nation (1733) constitute the first major expression of Voltaire’s deism and his subsequent lifelong opposition to religious and political oppression. Following the happy years (1734–43) spent at Cirey with his mistress Mme du Châtelet in the shared pursuit of several intellectual enthusiasms, notably the work of Isaac Newton, he enjoyed a brief interval of favour at court during which he was appointed Historiographer to the King. After the death of Mme du Châtelet in 1749 he finally accepted an invitation to the court of Frederick of Prussia, but left in 1753 when life with this particular enlightened despot became intolerable. In 1755, after temporary sojourn in Colmar, he settled at Les Délices on the outskirts of Geneva. He then moved to nearby Ferney in 1759, the year Candide was published.
  • The Sophistic Roman: Education and Status in Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny Brandon F. Jones a Dissertation Submitted in Partial

    The Sophistic Roman: Education and Status in Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny Brandon F. Jones a Dissertation Submitted in Partial

    The Sophistic Roman: Education and Status in Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny Brandon F. Jones A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Alain Gowing, Chair Catherine Connors Alexander Hollmann Deborah Kamen Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Classics ©Copyright 2015 Brandon F. Jones University of Washington Abstract The Sophistic Roman: Education and Status in Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny Brandon F. Jones Chair of Supervisory Commitee: Professor Alain Gowing Department of Classics This study is about the construction of identity and self-promotion of status by means of elite education during the first and second centuries CE, a cultural and historical period termed by many as the Second Sophistic. Though the Second Sophistic has traditionally been treated as a Greek cultural movement, individual Romans also viewed engagement with a past, Greek or otherwise, as a way of displaying education and authority, and, thereby, of promoting status. Readings of the work of Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny, first- and second-century Latin prose authors, reveal a remarkable engagement with the methodologies and motivations employed by their Greek contemporaries—Dio of Prusa, Plutarch, Lucian and Philostratus, most particularly. The first two chapters of this study illustrate and explain the centrality of Greek in the Roman educational system. The final three chapters focus on Roman displays of that acquired Greek paideia in language, literature and oratory, respectively. As these chapters demonstrate, the social practices of paideia and their deployment were a multi-cultural phenomenon. Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................... 2 Introduction ....................................................................................... 4 Chapter One.
  • The Problem: the Theory of Ideas in Ancient Atomism and Gilles Deleuze

    The Problem: the Theory of Ideas in Ancient Atomism and Gilles Deleuze

    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013 The rP oblem: The Theory of Ideas in Ancient Atomism and Gilles Deleuze Ryan J. Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Johnson, R. (2013). The rP oblem: The Theory of Ideas in Ancient Atomism and Gilles Deleuze (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/706 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PROBLEM: THE THEORY OF IDEAS IN ANCIENT ATOMISM AND GILLES DELEUZE A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty College & Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Ryan J. Johnson May 2014 Copyright by Ryan J. Johnson 2014 ii THE PROBLEM: THE THEORY OF IDEAS IN ANCIENT ATOMISM AND GILLES DELEUZE By Ryan J. Johnson Approved December 6, 2013 _______________________________ ______________________________ Daniel Selcer, Ph.D Kelly Arenson, Ph.D Associate Professor of Philosophy Assistant Professor of Philosophy (Committee Chair) (Committee Member) ______________________________ John Protevi, Ph.D Professor of Philosophy (Committee Member) ______________________________ ______________________________ James Swindal, Ph.D. Ronald Polansky, Ph.D. Dean, McAnulty College & Graduate Chair, Department of Philosophy School of Liberal Arts Professor of Philosophy Professor of Philosophy iii ABSTRACT THE PROBLEM: THE THEORY OF IDEAS IN ANCIENT ATOMISM AND GILLES DELEUZE By Ryan J. Johnson May 2014 Dissertation supervised by Dr.
  • HICKS-DISSERTATION-2013.Pdf

    HICKS-DISSERTATION-2013.Pdf

    Copyright by Benjamin Vines Hicks 2013 The Dissertation Committee for Benjamin Vines Hicks Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Satiric Effect in Horace’s Sermones in the Light of His Epicurean Reading Circle Committee: L. Michael White, Supervisor David Armstrong, Co-Supervisor Thomas Hubbard Timothy Moore Kirk Freudenburg The Satiric Effect in Horace’s Sermones in the Light of His Epicurean Reading Circle by Benjamin Vines Hicks, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2013 The Satiric Effect in Horace’s Sermones in the Light of His Epicurean Reading Circle Benjamin Vines Hicks, Ph.D The University of Texas at Austin, 2013 Supervisors: L.Michael White and David Armstrong Scholarship on Roman satire has been dominated for nearly fifty years by a rhetorical approach that emphasizes the artifice of the poet. Consequently, it has been unsure what to do with the philosophical material in Horace’s Sermones. In my dissertation, I argue for the importance of Epicurean philosophy in the interpretative scheme of Horace’s satiric oeuvre. Epicurean ideas appear prominently and repeatedly, mostly in a positive light, and respond to the concerns and philosophical prejudices of Horace’s closest friends. In the prologue, I explore how Horace himself inscribes the process of interpreting and responding to a satire into S. 2.8. He frames his reading circle as key observers in the satiric scene that unfolds before them, suggesting the importance of the audience to satire.
  • TREASURES from the VILLA DEI PAPIRI at the J. Paul Getty Museum, Getty Villa, June 26, 2019 – October 27, 2019

    TREASURES from the VILLA DEI PAPIRI at the J. Paul Getty Museum, Getty Villa, June 26, 2019 – October 27, 2019

    1 EXHIBITION CHECKLIST BURIED BY VESUVIUS: TREASURES FROM THE VILLA DEI PAPIRI At the J. Paul Getty Museum, Getty Villa, June 26, 2019 – October 27, 2019 The Villa dei Papiri was a sumptuous private residence on the Bay of Naples, just outside the Roman town of Herculaneum. Deeply buried by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in AD 79, it was rediscovered in 1750 when well diggers chanced upon its remains. Eighteenth-century excavators battled poisonous gases and underground collapses to extract elaborate floors, frescoes, and sculptures – the largest collection of statuary ever recovered from a single classical building. They also found more than one thousand carbonized papyrus book rolls, which gave the villa its modern Italian name. Because many of the scrolls contain the writings of the philosopher and poet Philodemus of Gadara, scholars believe that the villa originally belonged to his patron, Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus, father-in-law to Julius Caesar. The ancient villa fascinated oil magnate J. Paul Gh etty, w o decided to replicate it in Malibu, creating the Getty Villa in the early 1970s. Renewed excavations at Herculaneum in the 1990s and 2000s revealed additional parts of the building and narrowed the date of its initial construction to around 40 BC. This exhibition presents significant artifacts discovered in the 1750s, explores ongoing attempts to open and read the badly damaged papyri, and displays recent finds from the site for the first time. 1. Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus Pontifex Roman, 15 BC–AD 33 Bronze, H: 43.5 cm From Herculaneum Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Naples, 5601 VEX.2019.1.21 Exhibition catalog number 3 Image: Giorgio Albano Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus Pontifex (48 BC–AD 32) likely inherited the Villa dei Papiri from his father, and he may have been responsible for part of the building’s decoration and the expansion of its library.
  • Controversial Elements in Lucretius

    Controversial Elements in Lucretius

    Controversial Blements In Xucretius B^ (3eoroe p. Echman a^^ ^,.,^^^<^—i^/y^-"'^ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/controversialeleOOeckmrich ^ntxoi?tx0iat ^^tmrnte in Bucre^iue A THESIS FOR THE Doctorate in pbiloeopbi? BY- GEORGE P. ECKMAN APPROVED BY THE EACULTY OE THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OE THE XEW YORK CXIVERSITY, rSgy Nkw York 1899 El ^T]6ev r]\kas al twv (j.€T€(dp(ov viro\|/Cai t|v«x\ovv Kttl al irepl Gavdrov, |xir'] iroTe irpos rifids rj ti, €Ti t€ to }iT) Karavoeiv tovs opovs twv d\'YT]86va)v Kal twv eiriOv- (i,iwv, ovK dv irpocre8e6|ie8a 4>v(rio\o-Yias. 'EiriKOvpov Kvpiai A6|ai, XI. Dioi^encs Laerfins. X. 142. Printed for the author by Charles B. Jackson, New York. -3611 CONTEXTS. Table of Contents. INTRODUCTION. Ap Contemporary Interest in Epicureanism. Character of the period. Causes of the apparent neglect of Lucretius by his contemporaries. Influence of Epicureanism upon cultivated Romans. Reasons for Cicero's comparative silence regarding Lucretius. Recognition of the poet by later generations. (§) A Preliminary Question. To what extent did Lucretius pursue original investigations .' The poets devotion to Epicurus. Evidences of servile imita- tion. Marks of independent treatment of physical pheno- mena. No extreme position tenable. Divisions of the present discussion. L Philosophers With Whom Lucretius Contends Amicably. Respects for early physicists. The main contention. 7. Einpedocles. Object of Lucretius' admiration. Internal evidence that Lucretius studied the works of Empedocles. Halliers proofs. Similarity of literary style. Rhetorical imitations. Doctrinal agreement. Resemblances in explana- tions of physical phenomena.
  • Life and Works by the Middle of the First Century BCE a Flouris

    Life and Works by the Middle of the First Century BCE a Flouris

    FRANK SPEECH, FLAITERY, AND FRIENDSHIP IN PHILODEMUS CLARENCE E. GLAD Philodemus: life and Works By the middle of the first century BCE a flourishing Epicurean com­ munity existed at Naples under the leadership of the Greek teacher Siro. At nearby Herculaneum the Syrian Epicurean, Philodemus of Gadara, the house-philosopher of the influential patron Calpurnius Piso, father-in-law of Julius Caesar, was attracting a wide circle of students. Epicureanism also had its contemporary exponents in Latin-Catius Insuber, Rabirius, C. Amafinius, whose prose tracts enjoyed popularity in Rome and in various Italian towns, and the poet Lucretius. The relationship among the Epicurean groups in Italy is not clear but apparently Siro's group in Naples and that of Philodemus at Herculaneum had an open exchange of views. I Both Philodemus and Siro were former pupils of Zeno of Sidon, the scholarch of the Epicurean school in Athens, and one would expect a certain co-ordination in their efforts in promoting Epicurean views in southern Italy. Both groups cultivated interest in literary and philosophical study, thus escaping the charge traditionally levelled at Epicureans that they maintained a deliberate disregard for ge~eral learning; Cicero, for example, refers to both Siro and Philodemus as the "excellent and learned friends" of Torquatus.2 Philodemus' scholarly interest is evident from the number of pa­ pyrus rolls recovered from Piso's suburban villa at Herculaneum. I We know that the poets of Siro's group, L. Varius Rufus and Quintilius Varus, and possibly Virgil and Plotius Tucca, associated with Philodemus as well, and that the discussion between Philodemus and his fellow Epicureans at Naples extended also to philosophical matters (pHerc.
  • Hedonism in Abstract Art: Minimalist Digital Abstract Photography Srdjan Jovanović Palacky University

    Hedonism in Abstract Art: Minimalist Digital Abstract Photography Srdjan Jovanović Palacky University

    Hedonism in Abstract Art: Minimalist Digital Abstract Photography Srdjan Jovanović Palacky University Abstract In this piece of writing the writer/artist puts forward the view that art can be understood and taken in as sometimes purely hedonistic. By drawing upon the theories pertaining to hedonism, he applies this view to minimalist digital abstract photography and tries to justify his point of view with the help of three abstract photographs. Science is the one instance of human thought that has got the most explanatory power. Science explains, and that is wherefrom its importance comes. Its explanatory power is not only useful; however, it can also offer great amounts of pleasure for an intelligent being. Yet there are other instances of human effort in which pleasure is the only goal. From the Greek hedonist Democritus to today’s hedonist/atheist philosopher Michel Onfray, we can follow a line of pure pleasure in human thought. Hedonism, as a principle, is a philosophy of enjoyment. It is vastly misunderstood, though. It is a common error to say that hedonism simply means doing only and exclusively that which brings the subject intense pleasure. This line of thought falsely accuses and misinterprets the hedonist of taking joy as the only goal in life, sacrificing everything else to the unique goal of achieving greater states of gratification. This is incorrect on many a level. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities Summer Issue,Volume I, Number 1, 2009 URL of the journal: www.rupkatha.com/issue0109.php URL of the article: www.rupkatha.com/0109hedonisminabstractart.pdf © www.rupkatha.com Rupkatha Journal, Issue 1 2009 The designation ‘hedonism’ comes from the Greek word for ‘pleasure’, ήδονή.
  • University of London Thesis

    University of London Thesis

    REFERENCE ONLY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THESIS Degree pWo Year 'Loo'S' j Name of Author F COPYRIGHT This is a thesis accepted for a Higher Degree of the University of London. It is an unpublished typescript and the copyright is held by the author. All persons consulting the thesis must read and abide by the Copyright Declaration below. COPYRIGHT DECLARATION I recognise that the copyright of the above-described thesis rests with the author and that no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. LOANS Theses may not be lent to individuals, but the Senate House Library may lend a copy to approved libraries within the United Kingdom, for consultation solely on the premises of those libraries. Application should be made to: Inter-Library Loans, Senate House Library, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU. REPRODUCTION University of London theses may not be reproduced without explicit written permission from the Senate House Library. Enquiries should be addressed to the Theses Section of the Library. Regulations concerning reproduction vary according to the date of acceptance of the thesis and are listed below as guidelines. A. Before 1962. Permission granted only upon the prior written consent of the author. (The Senate House Library will provide addresses where possible). B. 1962 - 1974. In many cases the author has agreed to permit copying upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. C. 1975 - 1988. Most theses may be copied upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. D. 1989 onwards. Most theses may be copied. This thesis comes within category D.