DOCSLIB.ORG

As Guest, Some Pages Are Restricted

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RELIG IONS ' ANCIENT AND MODERN B EDWARD GLODD au h o The Stor o Crea t o i n . Animism . y , t r of y f P B 'AMES ALLANSON PI CTON au h o f The li ion o the anth eism. y , t or Re g f Th li fAn en China . B P s G ILES LL . D . P s e Re g ions o ci t y rofes or , rofe sor f h e iv am d o Ch inese in t U n ersit o f C bri ge. B ' E H R R ISO u at Th e l i n f An i n . L Re ig o o c e t reece y AN A N , ect rer Ne vnha m C ll Camb d a u h o of Prole omm a. t o Stud o Greek v o ege, ri ge, t r g y f Rel igion . h e R H on. AMBER AL I SYED f h ud l m f His I B t t . o t e ' a C m e o slam. y , ici o itt e ’ s C un l au h o of The S it o slam and E hics o Isla m. Maje ty s Privy o ci , t r pir f I t f M i and Fe i hism . B Dr. A. C . H ADDON L u o n ag e t s y , ect rer hnolo a Ca m d e n s gt gy t bri g U iver ity . li n B W FL I D ERS PETB IE T n n i . P . M . N h e gio of A c e t Egypt y rofessor , nS F 0 ' ou of Bab l nia. an d B THEOPHI LUS G PiNCB Es Th e Re s ri . o A sy a y , l h e h use um ate 0 t Britis . B o es R n r s D V IDS D la f uddhism. P A LL . a o Early B y r f sor , te Secret ry i The Ro ya l As atic Society. H B D . D . NETT . L AR o ft he D a m n o f n P n e d in duism . y r B , ep rt e t Orie tal ri t k and M88 sh Mu um Boo s . , Briti se . l i B WILLI M A C IG IE ' n E f h an n. o d o t e Scandinavi Re ig o y A RA , i t itor Oxford E n lish Dict iona ry. C e B f s ANW YL e o f W l h n el tic Relig on. y Pro e sor , Prof ssor e s at U iversity lle e A e w C o b h . g , ryst yt Th e M t h l o n n B i a in and Ir lan B CHAR LES y o gy of A cie t r t e d. y S U l a E a u h o f The M tholo o t he Brit ish Isla nd s. Q , t or y gy f B ISR AEL ABR AHAMS L e u in Talm ud L e n m 'udaism . y , ct rer ic it rature i Ca b d Un i e au h Of 'ewish Li e in the M A ri ge v rsity, t or f iddle ges. i f n i n m B C Y I L BAILE Y M e l n o . R A. Th Re ig o A c e t Ro e y , . B W Th e n i n li i n . G A T C . hin o e o 'a . S ON . M . G an. S t , A c e t R g of p y , l i n of n n M i P B Law s SPE E M Th e an d u . NC i A. Re g o A cie t ex co er y , ‘ Earl Chris iani . B S . LAC K P s at MG ill Un e s y t ty y B B , rofe sor iv r it y. Th e Ps ch ol o ical Ori in and Na ur B P e s o v g g t e of Religion. y rof s r '. li LEU BA. e i i n f n i n Pal B ST NLE Y A COO K l . Th e R g o o A c e t est ine. y A . B F A . C . ONYB E RE S Manich ee ism. y C . ( hortly ) PHILOSOPHIES W B A. E au h f Early G reek Phil osop y B NN, t or o The Phil osophy of e Rat iona lism m t Nine teent h C u G reec , ent ry. ici m . B P o e o ST . G EORG E STOC K au h of Ded uc tive L St o s y r f ss r , t or ogic , d o oft h e A olo la to . e it r p gy ofP , etc P B o s A. T YLO St An P E . A R . d w U n la to . y r fes or , re s iversity, author o f oblem o ond uc The Pr fC t. B Fa h e R IC K ABY S' Sch olasticism . y t r , . H A YLO B P . E . TA R. ob be s . y rofessor L B Pro ALE' ANDER of w n C lle e ock e . y fessor , O e s o g . B T WH IT’I‘ AKER C . au h of The Ne la . omte and Mill . y , t or op ton ists Apollo the ssa s. n in e of Tya na. a nd o r E y H e n r B W. H . H UDSON au ho o f An Int rodu erb ert Sp ce . y , t r ct ion t o ' s hi o h Spe ncer P los p y. B T WE m AxE E Sch ope nh auer. y . B P o fe s CAMPBELL FRAS ER LL D Be rk el ey. y r sor , . B r SEW LL . mmed ia te l D . A I Swedenborg . y ( y ) L B EDW D C LODD ucre tius and t h e Atomists. y AR . L Wo k s. B ANTHONY M. Lunovr x Nie tzsch e ' His ife and r y c . E P I C U R U S By A . E . T AY L O R NEW YO RK DO DG E PU BLISHING C O MPANY 2 1 4 - 2 2 0 E A ST 2 3 1m ST R EET a nd A . T . FO R EWO R D HI T S little volume is , as its title proclaims, a brief study of the thought and te mperament of a remarkable f o . man , not the history a scientific school The band Of comrades who gathered round Epicurus in his Garden were held together n ot so much by a common intellectual interest in the pursuit of truth as by the ties of personal affection among themselves and per sonal devotion to a master whom they regarded more as a Redeemer from the ills of life than as a mere thinker . That the feelings of the Epicurea n society of a later date were of the same kind is amply proved o f by the tone the poem of Lucretius . Atomism as a scientific hypothesis Owes nothing t o Epicurus or to of d e any his followers he found it alrea y in exist nce, and every innovation which he made upon its existing o f V form was, from the scientific point iew, a change f for . o the worse As a man science , his place is with - - fla t t e ne rs. the circle squarers and the earth This , together with the fact that a volume o n ancient Atomism is announced to appear in due time in the Wh I present series , will explain y have said no more about the really scientific Atomism of the fifth century B C . than was absolutely necessary to place the indifference of Epicurus and his followers t o For I science in the proper light . similar reasons aoahi e e E P I C U R U S one have avoided dealing with Lucretius , the man a of genius in the Epicure n following, except where it has been necessary to cite him as a mere witness t o T he one the Epicurean tradition . point of interest to the student of the history of physical theories which has, as I hope, been made clearer than is usual in works on ancient Atomism is that the Epicurean Physics are throughout the result of an unhappy - attempt, which no clear headed thinker would ever d ln have undertaken , to fuse together the ra ically compatible doctrines Oi Democritus and Aristotle . If the esta blishment of this important point has made my second chapter into something like the exposure ‘ f For difi rent o . e a charlatan , the fault is not mine a ' reason I have said little as to the few facts definitely know n about the illustrious obscurities of the Epi cureau succession . I trust some compensation may be found in the chapter o n the anti - Epicurean polemic d carried on by the Platonic Aca emy .
Recommended publications
  • The Morals, Vol. 2 [1878]

    The Morals, Vol. 2 [1878]

    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. Plutarch, The Morals, vol. 2 [1878] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected]. LIBERTY FUND, INC.
  • Epicuro Y Su Escuela

    Epicuro Y Su Escuela

    EPICURO Y SU ESCUELA MARCELINO RODRÍGUEZ DüNÍS I. SITUACIÓN HISTÓRICA En el período helenístico surgen con gran fuerza tres escuelas de filosofía: la epicúrea, la estoica y la escéptica. Entre ellas hay más coincidencias de lo que en general se cree, aunque, ciertamente, el hilo conductor que las une radica en el afán por asegurar al hombre la serenidad y tranquilidad de ánimo, difíciles de conseguir en un mundo tan sumamente complejo y turbulento como el que sigue a la conquista del Oriente por parte de Alejandro. Sería un error sostener que la filosofía helenística en conjunto ocupa una si­ tuación secundaria respecto de los grandes sistemas de Platón y Aristóteles, aun­ que es cierto que el pensamiento espiritualista sufre un duro golpe con los epicúreos y los escépticos. En el estoicismo, por el contrario, hay, a pesar de su materialis­ mo corporealista, mayor afinidad con el platonismo. Los factores que explican la escasa atención que Epicuro presta a las tesis fundamentales de Platón y Aristóteles son de muy diversa índole. Las circunstancias históricas han cambiado. Alejandro, el discípulo de Aristóteles y el conquistador del mundo conocido, había demostra­ do que el orgullo y la autocomplacencia de los griegos se basaban al fin y al cabo en un vergonzante provincianismo. Otros mundos más exuberantes se habían abierto ante las mentes atónitas e incrédulas de los nuevos conquistadores, otros dioses, otras costumbres, otros hombres. Ya nada podía ser como antes. Los moldes den­ tro de los que se había desarrollado la vida de los griegos hasta entonces ya no servían; hasta los mismos dioses de la ciudad habían dejado de existir o estaban alejados de los intereses patrios, sordos a las súplicas de los hombres que, a pesar de rendirles el culto debido, no encontraban en ellos las fuerzas necesarias para seguir ostentando la merecida supremacía personal y colectiva sobre los otros pue­ blos.
  • The Polemical Practice in Ancient Epicureanism* M

    The Polemical Practice in Ancient Epicureanism* M

    UDK 101.1;141.5 Вестник СПбГУ. Философия и конфликтология. 2019. Т. 35. Вып. 3 The polemical practice in ancient Epicureanism* M. M. Shakhnovich St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation For citation: Shakhnovich M. M. The polemical practice in ancient Epicureanism. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2019, vol. 35, issue 3, pp. 461–471. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.306 The article explores the presentation methods of a philosophical doctrine in Greek and Ro- man Epicureanism; it is shown that for the ancient, middle, and Roman Epicureans a con- troversy with representatives of other philosophical schools was a typical way of present- ing their own views. The polemical practice, in which the basic principles of Epicureanism were expounded through the criticism of other philosophical systems, first of all, Academics and Stoics, was considered not only as the preferred way of presenting the own doctrine, but also as the most convenient rhetorical device, which had, among other things, didac- tic significance. The founder of the school, Epicurus, often included in his texts the terms used in other philosophical schools, giving them a different, often opposite, content. While presenting his teaching in the treatise “On Nature” or in letters to his followers, Epicurus pushed off the opinions of Democritus, Plato, and the Stoics, but resorted mainly to implicit criticism of his opponents, often without naming them by name. His closest students and later followers — Metrodorus, Hermarchus, Colotes, Philodemus, Lucretius, Diogenes of Oenoanda — continuing the controversy with the Academics and the Stoics, more frank- ly expressed their indignation about the “falsely understood Epicureanism” or erroneous opinions.
  • Reading of “De Rerum Natura” in the Light of Modern Physics

    Reading of “De Rerum Natura” in the Light of Modern Physics

    Open Journal of Philosophy 2012. Vol.2, No.4, 268-271 Published Online November 2012 in SciRes (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ojpp) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2012.24039 Reading of “De Rerum Natura” in the Light of Modern Physics Gualtiero Pisent Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, Padova, Italy Email: [email protected] Received April 28th, 2012; revised May 30th, 2012; accepted June 10th, 2012 An analysis of the Lucretius atomism is given, that makes particular reference to the naturalistic argu- ments and contents of the poem. A possible comparison with the atomism of nowadays, based on quite new, both theoretical (quantum mechanics) and experimental (particle accelerators) grounds, must be treated with much care. But it seems possible and interesting to compare at least the world outlined by Lucretius, with the new world, derived by familiarity with modern theories of matter. This is the point I have tried to stress. Keywords: Science; Nature; Atomism; Vacuum; Swerve Introduction gust of wind, which lashes the sea, strikes the ships and drag- sthe clouds [I-265].” Although Lucretius theories are not fully original (being de- We shall see later on, the reasons that suggest the atomistic rived in particular from Epicurus), the poem “De rerum natura” idea, but first of all we must be aware that the assumption, al- is so wide, self consistent and miraculously integral in the form though not trivial, is nevertheless realistic. arrived up to our days, that it is worthwhile to be studied and “The clothes, left on the seaside, become wet.
  • Candide and Other Stories (Oxford World's Classics)

    Candide and Other Stories (Oxford World's Classics)

    oxford world’ s classics CANDIDE and other stories Voltaire was the assumed name of François-Marie Arouet (1694– 1778). Born into a well-to-do Parisian family, he was educated at the leading Jesuit college in Paris. Having refused to follow his father and elder brother into the legal profession he soon won widespread acclaim for Œdipe (1718), the first of some twenty-seven tragedies which he continued to write until the end of his life. His national epic La Henriade (1723) confirmed his reputation as the leading French literary figure of his generation. Following a quarrel with the worthless but influential aristocrat, the Chevalier de Rohan, he was forced into exile in England. This period (1726–8) was particularly formative, and his Letters concern- ing the English Nation (1733) constitute the first major expression of Voltaire’s deism and his subsequent lifelong opposition to religious and political oppression. Following the happy years (1734–43) spent at Cirey with his mistress Mme du Châtelet in the shared pursuit of several intellectual enthusiasms, notably the work of Isaac Newton, he enjoyed a brief interval of favour at court during which he was appointed Historiographer to the King. After the death of Mme du Châtelet in 1749 he finally accepted an invitation to the court of Frederick of Prussia, but left in 1753 when life with this particular enlightened despot became intolerable. In 1755, after temporary sojourn in Colmar, he settled at Les Délices on the outskirts of Geneva. He then moved to nearby Ferney in 1759, the year Candide was published.
  • The Theory of Pleasure According to Epicurus 4 7

    The Theory of Pleasure According to Epicurus 4 7

    The Theory of Pleasure According to Epicurus 4 7 The Theory of Pleasure According to Epicurus Victor Brochard Translated and edited by Eve Grace Colorado College [email protected] Note: Victor Brochard (1848-1907) was a French scholar whose work was praised very highly by, among others, Friedrich Nietzsche and Leo Strauss. In Ecce Homo, Nietzsche described Brochard’s The Greek Skeptics as a “superb study” (1967, 243). During a course on Cicero given in the spring quarter at the University of Chicago in 1959, Strauss praised Brochard as among the greatest students of Greek philosophy prior to the First World War, and described this article as one of the rare cases in which, in his view, a problem has been properly solved. “La théorie du plaisir d’après Épicure” was first published in Journal des Savants (1904, 156-70, 205-13, 284-90), then reprinted in a collection of Brochard’s articles entitled Études de Philosophie Ancienne et de Philosophie Moderne (Paris: Vrin, 1954). It is here translated into English for the first time and reprinted by kind permission of Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin. I All those who have studied the moral philosophy of Epicu- rus with some care know that while the philosopher defines the sovereign good as pleasure, he gives to this word a very particular meaning which is not that of ordinary speech or of common opinion (Schiller 1902; cf. Guyau 1878; Usener 1887; Natorp 1893).1 But what exactly is this meaning? How did Epicurus conceive of pleasure? Here the difficulty begins. Most historians, perhaps excepting only Guyau, accept that according to Epicurus pleasure © 2009 Interpretation, Inc.
  • Eliopoulos Panos. Epicurus and Lucretius on the Creation of The

    Eliopoulos Panos. Epicurus and Lucretius on the Creation of The

    Eliopoulos Panos . Epicurus and Lucretius on the Creation of the Cosmos РАЗДЕЛIV COSMOLOGYINPERSONS КОСМОЛОГИЯВЛИЦАХ EPICURUS AND LUCRETIUS ON THE CREATION OF THE COSMOS PANOS ELIOPOULOS – Ph.D., University of Peloponnese, (Tripoli, Greece) E-mail:[email protected] Abstract: Although in the extants of Epicurus there is not a direct mention to the atomic swerve, other sources, among them Lucretius, confirm that the Athenian philosopher foresaw in the presence of this unpredictable atomic movement the solution for the cosmological problem. In the epicurean system, as presented through the writings of Epicurus and Lucretius, the creation of the cosmos is owed to the presence of atoms, which form compound bodies, and the void, which allows unimpeded movement. Keywords: Epicurus, Lucretius, Cosmos, Creation, Atom, Atomic Motion, Swerve. ЭПИКУР И ЛУКРЕЦИЙ О СОЗДАНИИ КОСМОСА ПАНОС ЭЛИОПУЛОС – доктор философии, Пелопонесский университет (г. Триполи, Греция) Статья посвящена компаративному анализу космологических концепций древнегрече- ского философа Эпикура и его последователя и доксографа, римского поэта и философа Лукреция. Сделан вывод о том, что и Эпикур, и Лукреций не представляют Вселенную хаосом, полагая, что сотворение и функционирование космоса подчинено законам природы и определенному порядку, наиболее значительная и исключительную роль в котором от- ведена атомам. Ключевые слова: Эпикур, Лукреций, космос, создание, атом, движение атомов. The aim of the epicurean reports on Physics is, according to Epicurus himself, to become acquainted with the celestial phenomena so as not to attribute to them characteristics that are shared only in the lives of men, such as will, deliberate action, or even causality (Epicurus, Letter to Herodotus , 80–82). Knowing science, discover- © EliopoulosPanos, 2015 ISSN 2307-3705.
  • The Problem: the Theory of Ideas in Ancient Atomism and Gilles Deleuze

    The Problem: the Theory of Ideas in Ancient Atomism and Gilles Deleuze

    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013 The rP oblem: The Theory of Ideas in Ancient Atomism and Gilles Deleuze Ryan J. Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Johnson, R. (2013). The rP oblem: The Theory of Ideas in Ancient Atomism and Gilles Deleuze (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/706 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PROBLEM: THE THEORY OF IDEAS IN ANCIENT ATOMISM AND GILLES DELEUZE A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty College & Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Ryan J. Johnson May 2014 Copyright by Ryan J. Johnson 2014 ii THE PROBLEM: THE THEORY OF IDEAS IN ANCIENT ATOMISM AND GILLES DELEUZE By Ryan J. Johnson Approved December 6, 2013 _______________________________ ______________________________ Daniel Selcer, Ph.D Kelly Arenson, Ph.D Associate Professor of Philosophy Assistant Professor of Philosophy (Committee Chair) (Committee Member) ______________________________ John Protevi, Ph.D Professor of Philosophy (Committee Member) ______________________________ ______________________________ James Swindal, Ph.D. Ronald Polansky, Ph.D. Dean, McAnulty College & Graduate Chair, Department of Philosophy School of Liberal Arts Professor of Philosophy Professor of Philosophy iii ABSTRACT THE PROBLEM: THE THEORY OF IDEAS IN ANCIENT ATOMISM AND GILLES DELEUZE By Ryan J. Johnson May 2014 Dissertation supervised by Dr.
  • Lucretius, Catullus, Propartius And

    Lucretius, Catullus, Propartius And

    University of Alberta An Zllusion of Love: A Study of Male-Pemale Relationships in Four Roman Poets (Lucretius, Catullus, Propartius and Ovid) , and of the Reflections of their Poetry in Visual Art Margaret Marina Dtummond 0 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classical Studies Department of History and Classics Edmonton, Alberta Spring 1997 The author has granteci a non- L'auteur a accordé une Iiccnce non exclwve licence dowing the cxc1USiVT permettant à la Nationai Liirary of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, discn%ute or sell nprodiiirr, p&m, disa%uaou copies of Mer thesis by any means vendre des copies de sa thèse de and in any fomi or format, mahg 9ue1que manière et sous quelque this thesis available to interested forme que ce soit pour me- des persons. exemplaires de cetîe thèse à la disposition des personnes intéressées. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in hidher thesis. Ne~ther droit d'auteur qui protège sa thèse. Ni the thesis nor substantial extracts la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de fkom it may be p~tedor otherwise celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou reproduced with the author's autrement reproduits sans son permission. amtoriSati~1, To my children: àlison, Alexander Benjamin, fan, Andrew, Robert, Anastasia This thesis is interdisciplinary in nature, as it deals not only with Roman poetry of the late Republic and the early Empire, but also with visual art.
  • TREASURES from the VILLA DEI PAPIRI at the J. Paul Getty Museum, Getty Villa, June 26, 2019 – October 27, 2019

    TREASURES from the VILLA DEI PAPIRI at the J. Paul Getty Museum, Getty Villa, June 26, 2019 – October 27, 2019

    1 EXHIBITION CHECKLIST BURIED BY VESUVIUS: TREASURES FROM THE VILLA DEI PAPIRI At the J. Paul Getty Museum, Getty Villa, June 26, 2019 – October 27, 2019 The Villa dei Papiri was a sumptuous private residence on the Bay of Naples, just outside the Roman town of Herculaneum. Deeply buried by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in AD 79, it was rediscovered in 1750 when well diggers chanced upon its remains. Eighteenth-century excavators battled poisonous gases and underground collapses to extract elaborate floors, frescoes, and sculptures – the largest collection of statuary ever recovered from a single classical building. They also found more than one thousand carbonized papyrus book rolls, which gave the villa its modern Italian name. Because many of the scrolls contain the writings of the philosopher and poet Philodemus of Gadara, scholars believe that the villa originally belonged to his patron, Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus, father-in-law to Julius Caesar. The ancient villa fascinated oil magnate J. Paul Gh etty, w o decided to replicate it in Malibu, creating the Getty Villa in the early 1970s. Renewed excavations at Herculaneum in the 1990s and 2000s revealed additional parts of the building and narrowed the date of its initial construction to around 40 BC. This exhibition presents significant artifacts discovered in the 1750s, explores ongoing attempts to open and read the badly damaged papyri, and displays recent finds from the site for the first time. 1. Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus Pontifex Roman, 15 BC–AD 33 Bronze, H: 43.5 cm From Herculaneum Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Naples, 5601 VEX.2019.1.21 Exhibition catalog number 3 Image: Giorgio Albano Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus Pontifex (48 BC–AD 32) likely inherited the Villa dei Papiri from his father, and he may have been responsible for part of the building’s decoration and the expansion of its library.
  • Returning to Lucretius My Talk Is Divided up Into Two Parts

    Returning to Lucretius My Talk Is Divided up Into Two Parts

    Returning to Lucretius My talk is divided up into two parts: the first part tries explain about why I think we should return to Lucretius and where I am coming from in my own approach; the second part poses three heterodox “counter-theses” about Lucretius 1) that he was not an atomist, 2) that he did not believe in a spontaneous swerve in a rain of atoms through the void, 3) and that, for Lucretius, there is no ethical “peace of mind” or ataraxia, as Epicurus called it. Why Return to Luc retius? I think a new Lucretius is coming into view today. Every period in Western history since Lucretius has returned to him like bees returning to their flower fields in search of nourishment. Each time, though, our return is different—like the expanding arc of a spiral. We bring new questions, find new answers, and make Lucretius speak to us again as if for the first time. We make Lucretius’ epic poem De Rerum Natura into the mellifluous honey of a liquid antiquity that always has coursed through the veins of modern history like a spring of fresh meaning and inspiration.i We thus return to Lucretius today not as though he were an unchanging figure carved in stone but as if he were a rush of new life at the cutting edge of the 21st century. We stand in front of Lucretius’ breathtaking and revolutionary poem not as passive students of unchanging relics in a museum but as active participants in a history of our present. Today, we are asking Lucretius again to tell us something about nature.ii I recently returned to Lucretius in 2014, when I taught Book II of De Rerum Natura for a class on what I called “the philosophy of movement.” I added Lucretius to the syllabus because he was an overlooked figure in the history of philosophy who wrote about motion.
  • Controversial Elements in Lucretius

    Controversial Elements in Lucretius

    Controversial Blements In Xucretius B^ (3eoroe p. Echman a^^ ^,.,^^^<^—i^/y^-"'^ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/controversialeleOOeckmrich ^ntxoi?tx0iat ^^tmrnte in Bucre^iue A THESIS FOR THE Doctorate in pbiloeopbi? BY- GEORGE P. ECKMAN APPROVED BY THE EACULTY OE THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OE THE XEW YORK CXIVERSITY, rSgy Nkw York 1899 El ^T]6ev r]\kas al twv (j.€T€(dp(ov viro\|/Cai t|v«x\ovv Kttl al irepl Gavdrov, |xir'] iroTe irpos rifids rj ti, €Ti t€ to }iT) Karavoeiv tovs opovs twv d\'YT]86va)v Kal twv eiriOv- (i,iwv, ovK dv irpocre8e6|ie8a 4>v(rio\o-Yias. 'EiriKOvpov Kvpiai A6|ai, XI. Dioi^encs Laerfins. X. 142. Printed for the author by Charles B. Jackson, New York. -3611 CONTEXTS. Table of Contents. INTRODUCTION. Ap Contemporary Interest in Epicureanism. Character of the period. Causes of the apparent neglect of Lucretius by his contemporaries. Influence of Epicureanism upon cultivated Romans. Reasons for Cicero's comparative silence regarding Lucretius. Recognition of the poet by later generations. (§) A Preliminary Question. To what extent did Lucretius pursue original investigations .' The poets devotion to Epicurus. Evidences of servile imita- tion. Marks of independent treatment of physical pheno- mena. No extreme position tenable. Divisions of the present discussion. L Philosophers With Whom Lucretius Contends Amicably. Respects for early physicists. The main contention. 7. Einpedocles. Object of Lucretius' admiration. Internal evidence that Lucretius studied the works of Empedocles. Halliers proofs. Similarity of literary style. Rhetorical imitations. Doctrinal agreement. Resemblances in explana- tions of physical phenomena.