'In the Eye of the Cold War Hurricane'

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

'In the Eye of the Cold War Hurricane' ‘IN THE EYE OF THE HURRICANE’ COLD WAR ABOVE: Team 1, Scout Swimmer cadre of Detachment A undergo training in 1974 in Grossenbröde, DETACHMENT A, BERLIN BRIGADE Germany. They are, back row: Kevin Monahan, Bob Charest, Richard Lahue, Ralph Ormes, Willie Headon and Ron Bruce; Clandestine commandos of the legendary Green Berets front row: John Silk, Ernie Kirk, Frank Midill, Lee Dickerson, Paul served east of the Elbe River and behind the Iron Curtain Piuisz and Sparky Airhart. to confront communism between 1956 and 1984. Until this year, their role in the Cold contingent operated behind the scenes, not even acknowledged until long after War was unheralded. With the 25th the Cold War ended. Only this year were anniversary of the Berlin Wall’s fall, they fully and publicly recognized. now is a good time to provide them BORN IN THE MID-’50S with long overdue recognition. Though the Status-of-Forces Agreement signed by all four powers occupying 9P9F9:?8I<JK Photos courtesy Bob Charest Berlin prohibited elite forces, each coun- try had its own prowling the city. It was erlin was a dangerous place during the Cold War. A preserved piece of 10 years after WWII ended, however, the Wall containing a mural memorializing 146 Germans killed trying to before the U.S. had such a unit formally escape communism stands in stark testament. in place there. As the grand central station of East-West espionage, the city was a play- In August 1956, the elite 10th Special ground for all sorts of secret agents. And its place in the history of the 20th Forces Group, based in Bad Tolz, Germany, century far outweighs its size. Indeed, 37% of Americans viewed the fall of stationed the secretive 7781 Army Unit Bthe Berlin Wall as the single most important event of the 1980s. (also known as the 39th Special Forces That Wall came down after 28 years because Americans in uniform stood as a bar- Operational Detachment) in West Berlin. rier to Soviet aggression. The vast majority of those GIs were clearly visible. But a small It consisted of six modified detachments 42 VFW ƞNOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2014 that became part of the Headquarters Company of the 6th Infantry Regiment. Each team had six members. Two years later, the unit was renamed Detachment A and assigned to the Headquarters Company of the U.S. Army Garrison, Berlin. Then in April 1962, it was attached to the Berlin Brigade. Its area of operations was primarily that city, but it could undertake missions elsewhere in Europe. “Detachment A was literally in the eye of the Cold War hurricane,” said Lt. Gen. Charles T. Cleveland, commanding gen- On Jan. 30, 2014, this monument was dedicated to the Cold War warriors of eral of the U.S. Army Special Operations Detachment A of the Army Special Operations Command Memorial Plaza, N.C. Command. As an unconventional and classified outfit of 90 men (a normal tour of duty As masters of spy craft, team members military starting in 1972—came into play, was three years), Detachment A carried carried items reminiscent of a James killing six GIs in all. That meant being out clandestine operations. Originally Bond movie. Coal filled with C-4 explo- prepared to take on terrorists with snip- operating in small cells, by the late 1960s sives was used to potentially sabotage ers and SWAT tactics. it expanded to 12-man “A” teams. the rail ring surrounding Berlin. One- “They were very brave men and took Unit members were as unique as the shot cigarette-lighter guns, vials filled on some tough missions,” recalled Sidney U.S. Army ever recruited. Many were with metal shavings for destruction of Shachnow, who led Detachment A from German or East European refugees who turbines and noise-suppressed weapons 1970 to 1974. still had families trapped behind the Iron for eliminating targets were all part of Still, the Soviet threat hovered over ANE’ Curtain. In the early years, a significant the arsenal. The German Walther MPK the divided city. In 1978, the unit was number were WWII vets, too. Hence 9mm SMG that fit in a briefcase was the tasked by the CIA with digging up sev- they brought much-needed skills along weapon of choice. All scuba gear was eral mission sites positioned throughout with knowledge of other nations and lan- German-made, including the one-man Berlin for stay-behind operations. Also, guages to the unit. portable decompression chamber. to maintain the equipment in them— Every member spoke fluent German weapons and demolitions, for example. TRAINING & TOOLS OF THE TRADE and dressed mostly in authentic German Within six years, however, the mis- Physical training was wide-ranging and civilian clothes. They sometimes carried sion of this unique outfit was deemed progressively intense. For instance, win- non-American flash documentation and unnecessary even though the Cold War ter warfare training in Bavaria consist- identification. Dual passports, or dual was far from over. At the end of 1984, ed of downhill and cross-country skiing nationalities, were part of the deception. Detachment A was disbanded. “I knew equivalent to extreme skiing. Adversaries in this potentially dead- when I closed the door,” said Eugene Specialized demolition training was ly game of cat and mouse included the Piasecki, the detachment’s last com- required for various targets in Berlin. notorious East German Secret Police mander, “I would no longer serve in a Some teammates attended the CIA’s spe- (Stasi), Soviet KGB (Committee for State unit like that.” cialized demo course at Harvey Point, Security) and even Spetsnaz (Russian To preserve that legacy, the idea of N.C. Scuba diving was another required Special Purpose Forces). Being vigilant erecting a permanent tribute was born. skill. Every month, members made para- of Soviet surveillance was a given. It was the brainchild of unit veteran chute jumps staging out of Tempelhof The KGB had members under con- Jimmy Spoo. On Jan. 30, 2014, a monu- Air Base in Berlin. stant watch and possessed dossiers on ment was dedicated on the Army Special Detachment A participated in NATO everyone in Detachment A. Yet the Green Operations Command Memorial Plaza at escape and evasion exercises. Exercises Berets always deceived their adversaries Fort Bragg, N.C. exclusive to Berlin included dead drops, into believing they were an exponential- “This is the true legacy of the men of live drops, primary meetings, surveil- ly larger force than they really were. Detachment A,” Gen. Cleveland said. lance and communications. “They played a crucial role in vanquish- Team members trained with the elite MISSION AND MONUMENT ing an existential threat to our way of West German Federal Border Guard During the mid-1970s, the unit’s mission life. We bring this unit a bit more out the and Border Protection Group 9, British began to evolve. Though the classic Cold shadows by dedicating this stone.” - Special Air Service and special police War enemy always remained, a new one E-MAIL [email protected] units. But they also taught an urban reared its ugly head in the form of ter- BOB CHAREST, a retired Army master course to other 10th SFG personnel, as rorism. The lethal Red Army Faction —a sergeant, served with Detachment A from well as SEAL Team 2 based on Crete. rabid Marxist group targeting the U.S. 1969 to 1972 and 1973 to 1978. NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2014 WWW.VFW.ORG 43.
Recommended publications
  • 24Th Infantry Division Association
    24th Infantry Division . • 2 ECH) . l \C iO RY'O/ V ~T ~ ISIOty - - - ~ .- ,;;..'-'-' .. \;-.,. ~ Welcome to the 24th InfanCfll, Division, soldier. now a menib~\2u9h) combat-ready unit- with a -..Lor through two majo"4!~rs. Inltlally,~guestlQJIs ari~rdin!il your newlml,l or the country'-"""which you are SlaliO~iS booklet, cQn1IQe!"oraling the division's 26th anniversary; may gIve you some answers .- 2 ,~ , ......... ,.. '" .... ' ~, ~ <.... , "" ---.. ~ ........ ~--_., ..;:,"" --. ~-.., - - T1>t....,G.. _ d ,I>< Uth W....u-1 n""f"'" ~1"(" ....... 0\ .... ,1'",.• ........ 11k.I, to !orV'. Ttl. V!":" ..""" ......, ...~ ",,,b tIl<R'--~'" 0., ..... l.c>yto. ~ I/IdoO<O. lJ.o ,,,,,. CO"''';-' MInd''''"' Ta'l"'" ,td ~ .."" ... .... <0 ....... ,Iv"'. ""''''~ ..... ~. So "..,m>< y I><"'"~'' ' " ......00 ",... ,ItO pr'<tl<;:o: d «",,'\0.'" ,b< " "t~'1 L-""I>k>o ,...a.) ,B tit • .,.'" CO" "".~ .,Uo P''''''' Tot- T>r~ V" ... bo.l~" ~ ..Il""''''''' fPl"ltioc. " . ,,<or" ... ""'".,.,.. 01 ••n~ .""."".,,..! I'.••• , .... ""'01 .",:l <0""",,0«. AJJ Uo' ~ ~ 'b 1tlI;u>1'~ Ih<l"''' c~"...,~, .... ,t; lEI. fur .. .. r""" '0 ....... ,10>.. I ()::,~''''. ,II< dU"" ..,.d ".""n' ..... ' ,~- .. ", be ""'.... ,. , ..04.. rt~ ..., ~ '<<I" n,y ....... ,...... lOr M~'~ >~« ... ,n the ,n<I" ioO" thO \'''''''f 1)<""0<\. "' ... ...u .f to. .m.. '" .... ... " .f .... 1<11.1,"" , .. "...".o"."..,o! • ...,... .... 1 ....... _","'0"- ......." ",.".0 .. -" .. , .. ",,,, I"'''''''' .. .-1"_" "'" ....'" ~ f ..... ,-'>''''1><.0 AMI .... ..,.· ....... .,.u.'" ..... .... ,,""
    [Show full text]
  • US Army, Berlin, 1961-1994
    COLD WARRIORS, GOOD NEIGHBORS, SMART POWER: U.S. ARMY, BERLIN, 1961-1994 Rex A. Childers A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2015 Committee: Beth A. Griech-Polelle, Advisor Marc V. Simon Graduate Faculty Representative Bill Allison Michael E. Brooks © 2015 Rex Childers All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Beth Griech-Polelle, Advisor The end of the Cold War and the manner in which it was “won” by the Allied nations ignited debate over the utility of military power as a source of American leadership in the new unipolar world. A popular theme arose, that a new form of state power, soft power, had the capacity to achieve America’s interests as it prepared to enter the 21st century. The idea that expensive and dangerous technologies could be replaced by investments in peaceful means of influence, wielded by America’s foreign policy professionals to foster a new cooperative spirit in the world, was naturally attractive. The United States could be relieved of much of its global military presence and reduce its military’s intrusions upon foreign people and their cultures. This dissertation challenges the assumption that the impact of military stationing in the Cold War was limited to hard power. In the case of the U.S. Army in Berlin, the unit and its members practiced civic, social, cultural, and political behaviors that meet the criteria of the post-Cold War branded term, soft power. In their daily interactions with Berliners, they exercised the full spectrum of foreign policy smart power tools, as Cold Warrior defenders of West Berlin and in compliance with U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Update
    WASHINGTON UPDATE A MONTHLY NEWSLETIER Vol 6 No 7 Published by the AUSA Institute of Land Warfare August 1994 National security strategy statement signed by Readiness Task Force submits report. The find­ President Clinton. Titled "AN ational Security Strategy ings and recommendations of the Defense Science Board of Engagement and Enlargement, July 1994," this paper Task Force on Readiness, chaired by Gen. Edward C. outlines the administration's goals and guidelines under ·Meyer, former Army Chief of Staff, were released by three broad headings: security, economics and democ­ OSD on July 22. Based on preliminary releases, there racy. It is, therefore, considerably broader than national were no surprises in the final report. It found that the defense. readiness of forces today was generally acceptable for missions as currently defined. It did, however, note Such a statement has been long awaited, but it adds pockets of unreadiness and raised red flags for the future. nothing new with respect to national military strategy. Rather, it confirms the DoD Bottom-Up Review along The report strongly emphasized the need to keep readi­ with the adjusted five-year budget as basic defense ness as a top priority concern and the need to guard against the negative pressures (force reductions, fre­ guidelines. It endorses the need for capability to handle quent mission deployments, budget cuts, turbulence, two nearly simultaneous regional conflicts as the basis etc.) which could push forces into a "hollow state." for planning, and stresses the need to draw the line against further cuts that would undermine the force Special note was made of the need to address joint structure or erode U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divided City - Berlin 1965-67
    THE DIVIDED CITY - BERLIN 1965-67 The Battalion (Bn) went off to Berlin in September 1965, leaving me behind to complete the Regimental Signal Officers’ Course in Hythe. Their destination was Brooke Barracks, Spandau, where they had already been stationed in the mid-fifties. The whole Bn went in a standard move taking families, children and pets with them. In those days, few soldiers had cars and only some officers, so most of them went by air, and others by ferry and train. I arrived in Berlin in late November, to a cold and icy city. As my first time stationed in Germany, in its old capital, it was going to be quite a special experience. I knew about ‘The Wall’ and the divided nation, and the Four Power Agreement, and that it was a very old, very grand, very proud capital city. I spoke no German at that time, and had a jaundiced view about Berlin, acquired from my Mother who came from Hamburg. However, I realised it would be useful to know some German phrases, so she taught me enough to get going. One gem I remember especially is not exactly vital but is amusing: ‘Ich muss mal auf clo gehen!’ which means ‘I must go to the loo’! On arrival at Tempelhof Airport in the centre of Berlin, from Gatwick, I was most impressed with the modern art-nouveau design. The airport was very clean and spacious. There seemed to be many cleaners about to keep the place going. Tempelhof Airport was very avant-garde and shiny.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the Berlin Crisis of 1961
    A Brief History of the Berlin Crisis of 1961 Neil Carmichael National Declassification Center National Records and Archives Administration Autumn 2011 marks the 50th anniversary of the political crisis that resulted in the erection of the Berlin Wall which divided that German city for 28 years. The National Declassification Center of the National Archives and Records Administration and the Historical Collections Division of the Central Intelligence Agency have partnered to publish newly declassified documents that reveal intimate details of the five month Berlin Crisis of 1961. Included in this joint publication are newly released documents that show behind-the-scenes security discussions and planning. The Department of State has added a contemporary 600- page report, never before disclosed, on the impact of the events surrounding the crisis and the deepening of the Cold War. Other documents explain the looming threat the crisis represented to the legal status and rights of the three Western Powers in Berlin; Britain, France and the United States, and provides a sense of the real-time spiral of statements, military acts, parry and feints, that led to international brinksmanship as the West went toe-to-toe with a USSR ready to annex or asphyxiate Berlin. Events leading up to the Crisis 1958-1960 From the end of World War II in 1945, the question of Berlin’s status 90 miles within the Deutsche Demokratische Republik (East Germany) and the Soviet Unions’ zone of occupation, along with the status of Germany among the community of nations, remained a source of tension between the East and West. Premier Khrushchev continued to push President Eisenhower and the other Western leaders for resolution of the issue In November 1958, Khrushchev issued an ultimatum giving the Western Powers six months to agree to withdraw from Berlin and make it a free, demilitarized city.
    [Show full text]
  • Reserve Component Special Operations Forces
    Special Warfare The Professional Bulletin of the John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School Reserve Component Special Operations Forces PB 80–92–1 March 1992 Vol. 5, No. 1 From the Commandant Special Warfare Probably nowhere in the Army is the importance help them improve land-navigation and other basic of reserve-component forces more evident than in skills. Since 1989, this course, developed with the special operations. help of the National Guard Bureau, has reduced RC The majority of our special-operations forces are attrition by approximately 50 percent. found in the reserve components: Nearly half of our In September 1992, new tables of organization Special Forces soldiers belong to either Army and equipment for Civil Affairs foreign-internal- Reserve or National Guard groups; 87 percent of our defense and unconventional-warfare battalions will PSYOP and 97 percent of our Civil Affairs troops are provide reserve-component detachments more pre- in the Army Reserve. cisely tailored for the various CA missions in LIC. As Recent military operations have emphasized the we work to integrate this new RC capability into our value of these reserve components: During Opera- doctrinal, operational and organizational concepts, tion Just Cause, there was an urgent need for more we are also producing mission training plans which Civil Affairs soldiers, and thousands of reservists will assist commanders of these new units in train- volunteered, caring for civilians in the combat area, ing for their assigned missions. These MTPs are providing shelter to dislocated civilians, and restor- scheduled to be complete before the changeover to ing civil government and services quickly so that the new TOE.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Deterrent Impact of U.S. Overseas Forces for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N BRYAN FREDERICK, STEPHEN WATTS, MATTHEW LANE, ABBY DOLL, ASHLEY L. RHOADES, MEAGAN L. SMITH Understanding the Deterrent Impact of U.S. Overseas Forces For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2533 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0078-9 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: U.S. Army photo by Spc. Andrew McNeil Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Limited War: The Role of Ground Forces in Extended Deterrence and Escalation Management, sponsored by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Plans, and Training (G-3/5/7), U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Evaluation of U.S
    U.S. ARMY COLD WAR ERA MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES THEMATIC STUDY AND GUIDELINES: IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF U.S. ARMY COLD WAR ERA MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES U.S. Army Environmental Center Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21020-5401 1 U.S. ARMY COLD WAR ERA MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document provides a national historic context for the U.S. Army’s military-industrial involvement in the Cold War (1946-1989). The goal of the project was two-fold: (1) to develop a thematic study on historic properties associated specifically with the military-industrial theme of the Cold War and (2) to provide guidelines for the identification and evaluation of Cold War era military-industrial historic properties in the Army. The document emphasizes the specific relevance of the Cold War to the Army’s military- industrial history, rather than the general context of the Army during the Cold War period. In other words, although there is some discussion of the Army’s traditional mission, the focus of this historic context is on what the Army did in direct response to the Cold War. For the purposes of this study, the Cold War is defined primarily as the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union and is only secondarily defined as the general threat of communist aggression from other sources, such as China. The document is organized into seven chapters. Chapters 1, 2, and 3 provide an introduction and discuss the goals and methodology, respectively. Chapter 4.0, the Historical Narrative, provides an overview of the Army’s Cold War role.
    [Show full text]
  • Miraculously, It Worked the Improbable Beginnings of America’S First Post-Cold War Institution Abroad
    [PROD_10: TSP_04-SONDERTHEMEN-SONDERTHEMEN <KM_SONDER_R1E> ... 01.10.14] Autor:R_BROCKSCHMIDT 02.10.14 10:41 AMERICAN ACADEMY Twenty Years of Cultivating Relationships across the Atlantic MITTWOCH, 1. OKTOBER 2014 / NR. 22 182 SEITE B1 Miraculously, It Worked The Improbable Beginnings of America’s First Post-Cold War Institution Abroad IT ALL STARTED in a back room of Holbrooke, who was about to depart for and doers of outstanding talent and re- the Berlin Kempinski, in 1994. The “cabal” Washington as the State Department’s Di- nown. And it would do so without a penny consisted of people like Henry Kissinger, rector of European Affairs, snagged the first of government largesse. When the German Otto Graf Lambsdorff, Fritz Stern, and Ri- few million for operating expenses and for Bundestag offered to chip in a million chard von Weizsäcker. And Richard Hol- the magnificent villa on the Wannsee. The marks, the board politely declined. This brooke, the American ambassador, without building and the park had belonged to the was going to be done the “American way” – whom the Academy would never have got- Arnhold family before they were driven out as a strictly private venture, in a country ten off the ground, in 1998. There is an Eng- by the Nazis. The new owner nicely symbo- where high culture has always been funded lish word, borrowed from German and Yid- lized Germany’s postwar rebirth as a liberal by the state, starting with the princes and dish, for types like him: Macher. and inclusive democracy. This was the potentates of pre-Reich Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Witnesses Recall Berlin Wall's Fall
    Witnesses Recall Berlin Wall’s Fall http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=56561 By Jim Garamone American Forces Press Service WASHINGTON, Nov. 6, 2009 – A divided Berlin symbolized the Cold War. The Berlin Wall was a concrete example of the divide between East and West, between totalitarianism and democracy, between communism and capitalism. For millions of U.S. servicemembers, the celebratory scenes at the fall of the Berlin Wall on Nov. 9, 1989, were cause for deep satisfaction. Since World War II, millions of soldiers, airmen, sailors and Marines held the line in West A West German man uses a hammer Germany. Their very presence was enough to and chisel to chip off a piece of the secure half a continent for freedom. When the wall Berlin Wall as a souvenir in November fell, more than 300,000 American servicemembers 1989. DoD photo were in West Germany, witnessing history. (Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image "We were watching developments for weeks as available. events unfolded," said Jeff Anderson a building contractor in San Antonio who was an Army infantry sergeant in the Berlin Brigade near Checkpoint Charlie at the time. Restrictions had been loosening for weeks, he recalled, as Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Germans and other captive people streamed out of Eastern Europe to freedom in the West. After several weeks of unrest in East Germany, officials there announced that all citizens could visit West Germany and West Berlin. "As soon as the East Germans made the announcement, thousands of people came down to the wall in both the East and West," Anderson said.
    [Show full text]
  • Regiments of the U.S. Army
    SECRETARY OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON The recently implemented u. S. Army Regimental System is one of the new Army initiatives of which I am proudest. Inspiring traditions of courage and sacrifice came from each of our regiments, traditions that parallel our national heritage. Regimental histories cannot help but instill in today's soldier a sense of commitment to the memory of yesterday's warrior. The histories and traditions of the regiments contained in this booklet are inspiring. They relate many of the campaigns and victories which won for this country its freedom and have preserved that freedom for succeeding generations of Americans. Regiments create for the Army a unique environment in which soldiers can sense greater esprit and identity, loyalty and commitment. Those qualities are in turn translated into increased combat readiness. The history of war clearly demonstrates that cohesive units are tougher and stand a better chance of survival in combat. I see the U. s. Army Regimental System as a great step toward creating that cohesion. Reprinted from ARMY magazine, copyright 1983, 1984, Association of the U.S. Army. 1st Infantry 2nd Infantry 3rd Infantry 4th Infantry 5th Cavalry 5th Infantry 6th Infantry The following brief histories make up the plans to appoint honorary regimental colo­ parts of both, but rarely the full coat of arms. first installment in a monthly series on the 64 nels, distinguished senior retired soldiers hav­ The illustrations were provided by the Army's combat arms regiments which the Army has ing an association with the unit who would Institute of Heraldy (TIOH) and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • OCCUPATION: Structures of the Berlin Brigade Mike Terry | Visual
    OCCUPATION: Structures of the Berlin Brigade Mike Terry | Visual & Media Anthropology MA Thesis OCCUPATION: Structures of the Berlin Brigade Mike Terry | 6 Octo er 2013 M.A% Thesis in Visual & Media Anthropology | Freie Uni(ersität Berlin Super(isor | Samuli Schielke Matriculation Nu* er | 4559633 This pro/ect was partially funded through the Fine Arts, Architecture, Music & Dance Graduate Grant fro* the Ger*an Academic Exchange Ser(ice% 2011-!"#$ 5o(er image: Museu* and *e*bers club for the 6.,#st 1uard Battalion at the for*er 5lay 6ead7uarters co*plex in Berlin-8ehlendorf% 9hoto y Mike Terry: !"#$% TAB;2 O& 5O+T2+TS I+T=O>'5T<O+ ! <% MET6O>O;O1? 10 <<% S<T2S & A+A;?S<S 20 TEUFELSBERG 21 CLAY HEADQUARTERS 42 TURNER BARRACKS / MUNITIONS DEPOT 59 TEMPELHOF 66 HÜTTENWEG CHAPEL 85 III. MONTAGE 104 CONCLUSION 118 EPILOGUE 121 WORKS CITED 123 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 129 DECLARATION IN LIEU OF OATH >edicated to 5harles and 2dna Terry Thanks for ringing us on your ad(entures% Berlin | !"#$ [Remaining perimeter wall at Truman Plaza; former nucleus of the US military community in Berlin-Zehlendorf !"#!$ 1 %NTR'(UCT%'& “There are no lived bodies without the places they inhabit and traverse...Bodies and places are co-natural terms. They inter-animate each other.” (Casey 1997:24) A majority of life's deepest moments; emotional and meaningf l! o"" r in pla"es trans"ending t#e role of mere setting$ %it#in t#e na&oida'le # man tas( of d)elling! e*ists a relations#ip 'et)een t#e individ al and t#e str "t re$ As pla"e is "reated from spa"e! its infl ence on t#e "reator and t#ose )#o follo) as sers and "reators t#emsel&es! is sym'iotic and endless$ ,o) do individ als se and relate to t#e ' ilt environment and #o) "an vis ally representing t#ese relations#ips "reate nique (no)ledge.
    [Show full text]