508 ESD Report March 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

508 ESD Report March 2019 EXPLORATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT COMBINED MONTHLY REPORT March 2019 Orion: Liftoff to Splashdown: Orion Is Safe SLS: A New Era of Space Exploration EGS: CSITU Swing Arm Prep www.nasa.gov ORION 4 Liftoff to Splashdown: Orion Is Safe 6 Fit To Fly 7 AA-2, Realigned 8 Supplier Spotlight: Honeybee Electronics SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM 10 A New Era of Space Exploration 11 SLS Engine Section Coming Together 12 What’s New in SLS Social Media 12 Rocket Science in 60 Seconds 13 RS-25 Engine Test Prep 14 Julie Bassler Is the Manager of the SLS Stages Office 14 Spaceflight Partners: Wildwood Electronics, Inc. EXPLORATION GROUND SYSTEMS 17 Moon to Mars 18 Crawler-Transporter 2 Gets Engine Maintenance in Prep for Exploration Mission-1 19 Exploration Ground Systems Gears Up for Exploration Mission-1 22 EGS Outreach on the Move 22 Outreach in the Virgin Islands ORION MARCH 2019 Liftoff to Splashdown: Orion is Safe Two key tests in March helped ensure NASA’s Orion spacecraft is safe from liftoff to splashdown for missions to the Moon. LIFTOFF TO SPLASHDOWN: ORION IS SAFE Engineers completed two key tests the week of March pounds of thrust from eight valves. This test was the first 18 to help ensure NASA’s Orion spacecraft is ready from in a series of evaluations aimed at qualifying the attitude liftoff to splashdown for missions to the Moon. Teams control motor for crewed missions. successfully tested one of the motors on Orion’s Launch Abort System responsible for taking the crew to safety in an Orion’s launch abort system is positioned on top of the crew emergency during launch, and completed testing at sea for module and is designed to protect astronauts during their the qualification of the system used to upright Orion after it trip to space. It can activate within milliseconds to pull the lands in the ocean. crew module to safety if needed. It consists of three solid rocket motors: the abort motor that pulls the crew module At its facility in Elkton, Maryland, Northrop Grumman away from a rocket, the attitude control motor that can hot fired a motor for Orion’s launch abort system. The steer Orion in any direction upon command, and the jettison attitude control motor is responsible for orienting the crew motor that ignites to separate the launch abort system from module for landing in the event that Orion’s ride to space the spacecraft so that Orion is free to deploy its parachutes experiences a failure during launch or ascent. The motor to assist with landing. is essential because it helps stabilize Orion and control its trajectory as it moves away from the rocket. During Ensuring crew safety continues throughout the mission, the 30-second test, the motor produced more than 7,000 including systems used to assist with returning astronauts 4 ESD Combined Report March 2019 to land. Off the coast of Atlantic Beach, North Carolina, if one of the airbags failed to inflate, the CMUS would still engineers tested the crew module uprighting system be able to perform as intended. (CMUS) to ensure the capsule can be oriented right-side up once it returns from its deep space missions. The system was previously tested in the Neutral Buoyancy Lab, a giant pool at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in When Orion splashes down in the ocean, it can settle in one Houston, primarily used for astronaut training, as well as off of two positions. In the most ideal scenario, the capsule is the coast of Galveston, Texas. Engineers also wanted to test oriented with the heat shield in the water and its windows the uprighting system in more challenging waves, similar to and hatches out of the water. The crew module also could those where Orion is expected to land, and partnered with land with the top submerged in the water, and the heat the Coast Guard to test the CMUS in the Atlantic Ocean. shield facing the sky. The CMUS deploys a series of five, bright orange airbags to flip the capsule right side up in Engineers experimented with four different CMUS the event the Orion lands upside down. It takes less than configurations over several days of testing. These tests four minutes for the system to upright the capsule to help verified the system’s ability to perform in varying wave protect the astronauts inside that are returning home from conditions, and demonstrated how the CMUS would protect future deep space missions. the crew in a wide range of landing scenarios. With the success of both tests, the Orion team is well on its way to In a perfect post-mission landing situation, all five of Orion’s verify Orion is ready for missions to the Moon and beyond. airbags will deploy to reorient the capsule, and while this is the most likely scenario for capsule recovery, NASA aims to Watch the ACM Hot Fire Facebook Live Here: be ready for any situation. Several tests performed with a bit.ly/ACM_Mar19Test mockup of the Orion crew capsule demonstrated that even FIT TO FLY Preparing for Orion’s crew and service modules leaving Florida for testing in Ohio, NASA’s Super Guppy aircraft underwent a fit check of the Orion crew and service module horizontal transport (CHT). At NASA’s Kennedy Space Center’s Shuttle Landing Facility in Florida, Space Florida operated the test to ensure transportation planning was correctly moving forward. The Super Guppy’s payload bay lay open as the CHT was moved inside, secured on the U.S. Air Force aircraft loader. This fit check was performed to confirm the procedure of loading operations, ensure that the CHT fit inside the Super Guppy with adequate space, and to test the needed aircraft interface to aircraft power. The Orion crew and service modules, which will be mated at the time, will be transported to NASA’s Plum Brook Station in Sandusky, Ohio, for full thermal vacuum testing. In this unique facility, the crew and service modules will be put through extensive testing to ensure they can survive the rigors of launch, space travel, re-entry and splashdown. AA-2, REALIGNED The Orion team at the NASA Kennedy Space Center Launch Abort System Facility in Florida recently completed the milestones of turning the Ascent Abort-2 (AA-2) launch abort system (LAS) vertical as well as mating the LAS with the AA-2 separation ring and crew module. This moves the AA-2 team another step closer toward the June 12 flight test. This full-stress test will see the LAS and a 22,000 pound crew module propelled on a booster to an altitude of 31,000 feet at Mach 1.15 (over 1,000 miles an hour). At that point, the LAS will begin its task of propelling the Orion crew module away from the vehicle, simulating an emergency abort of Orion. The test will verify that the LAS can steer astronauts inside the crew module to safety when the spacecraft is under the highest aerodynamics loads it will experience during ascent. SUPPLIER SPOTLIGHT HONEYBEE ELECTRONICS Headquartered in New York City, Honeybee Robotics, gearbox is part of the primary mechanism used in the Ltd. has been working with NASA since 1986. In the past, operation of the side hatch, which will allow crew members they have contributed hardware to programs such as their to manually open and close the hatch in order to enter Rock Abrasion Tool for the Mars Exploration Rovers and and egress the vehicle. Working on Orion is the first time the Sample Manipulation System on the Curiosity Rover, Honeybee will contribute their hardware and expertise to a to mention a few. However, for Orion, they developed human-rated spacecraft. They are proud to be a part of the something a little different. Honeybee is responsible for mission, as well as to have the opportunity to solve some of building Orion’s Side Hatch Gearbox Assembly. This the technical challenges associated with space travel. FOLLOW THE PROGRESS OF HOUSTON WE HAVE A PODCAST: NASA’S NEW SPACECRAFT ENGAGING THRUSTERS FOR HUMAN EXPLORATION: In episode 84, Steve Barsi, Orion European Service Module Propulsion Subsystem manager, discusses Orion’s propulsion system, how it works and why it’s Twitter .........................Twitter.com/NASA_Orion suited for deep space travel. Facebook .................... Facebook.com/NASAOrion Listen here: https://go.nasa.gov/2FBOs1W Flickr ............................ Flickr.com/NASAOrion Tumblr .......................... NASAOrion.tumblr.com SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM HIGHLIGHTS MARCH 2019 “AMERICA WILL ONCE AGAIN ASTONISH THE WORLD” www.nasa.gov A NEW ERA OF SPACE EXPLORATION NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine speaks with Marshall Space Flight Center employees during an all-hands meeting March 26. At the National Space Council meeting March 26, NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine told Vice President Vice President Mike Pence announced that NASA will Pence that NASA is up to the challenge. accelerate its plans to return to the Moon, with plans to “You have given us a charge today, and it is right on time,” land astronauts on the Moon’s South Pole by 2024. Administrator Bridenstine said. “Our Agency – NASA – is “Just as the United States was the first nation to reach going to do everything in its power to meet that vision, to the Moon in the 20th century, so too will be — we’d be the meet that deadline, and you have my full commitment to first nation to return astronauts to the Moon in the twenty- achieving that.” first century,” Pence said at the council gathering, held at During his visit to Huntsville, Administrator Bridenstine the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama.
Recommended publications
  • 1993 (179Kb Pdf)
    February 4, 1993 KSC Contact: Bruce Buckingham KSC Release No. 10-93 Notice To Editors/News Directors: KSC NEWS CENTER OFFICE HOURS FOR PEGASUS ARRIVAL The NASA B-52 aircraft carrying the Orbital Sciences Cor- poration Pegasus rocket is scheduled to arrive at KSC on Sunday, Feb. 7, with launch targeted for Feb. 9. The aircraft is currently scheduled to depart Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., at about 10:00 a.m. EST on Sunday with a single refueling stopover planned at Sheppard AFB, Texas. If weather permits, arrival of the aircraft at KSC's Shuttle Landing Facility should be about 4:30 p.m. EST. Status updates regarding the cross-country flight will be made on KSC's codaphone over the weekend. This can be reached by calling 407/867-2525. Public Affairs officers will be in the KSC Press Site office by 9:30 a.m. Sunday in order to provide status updates by phone. The office, however, will not officially open until it is deter- mined the aircraft will in fact be arriving at KSC. If it is determined that the aircraft will be successful in completing the day-long trip to KSC on Sunday, the office will officially open at 3:00 p.m. In that event, media interested in viewing the B-52/Pegasus arrival should plan on calling the KSC news center at 407/867-2468 for departure times to the Shuttle Landing Facility. News media who do not possess current credentials must con- tact the Public Information Office before close of business Friday, Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Operations
    7. Operations 7.1 Ground Operations The Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS) team addressed the launch site integra- tion of the exploration systems. The team was fortunate to draw on expertise from members with historical and contemporary human space flight program experience including the Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, Apollo Soyuz Test Project, Shuttle, and International Space Station (ISS) programs, as well as from members with ground operations experience reaching back to the Redstone, Jupiter, Pershing, and Titan launch vehicle programs. The team had a wealth of experience in both management and technical responsibilities and was able to draw on recent ground system concepts and other engineering products from the Orbital Space Plane (OSP) and Space Launch Initiative (SLI) programs, diverse X-vehicle projects, and leadership in NASA/Industry/Academia groups such as the Space Propulsion Synergy Team (SPST) and the Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group (ASTWG). 7.1.1 Ground Operations Summary The physical and functional integration of the proposed exploration architecture elements will occur at the primary launch site at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC). In order to support the ESAS recommendation of the use of a Shuttle-derived Cargo Launch Vehicle (CaLV) and a separate Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) for lunar missions and the use of a CLV for ISS missions, KSC’s Launch Complex 39 facilities and ground equipment were selected for conversion. Ground-up replacement of the pads, assembly, refurbishment, and/or process- ing facilities was determined to be too costly and time-consuming to design, build, outfit, activate, and certify in a timely manner to support initial test flights leading to an operational CEV/CLV system by 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbiter Processing Facility
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Shuttle: Orbiter Processing From Landing To Launch he work of preparing a space shuttle for the same facilities. Inside is a description of an flight takes place primarily at the Launch orbiter processing flow; in this case, Discovery. Complex 39 Area. TThe process actually begins at the end of each acts Shuttle Landing Facility flight, with a landing at the center or, after landing At the end of its mission, the Space Shuttle f at an alternate site, the return of the orbiter atop a Discovery lands at the Shuttle Landing Facility on shuttle carrier aircraft. Kennedy’s Shuttle Landing one of two runway headings – Runway 15 extends Facility is the primary landing site. from the northwest to the southeast, and Runway There are now three orbiters in the shuttle 33 extends from the southeast to the northwest fleet: Discovery, Atlantis and Endeavour. Chal- – based on wind currents. lenger was destroyed in an accident in January After touchdown and wheelstop, the orbiter 1986. Columbia was lost during approach to land- convoy is deployed to the runway. The convoy ing in February 2003. consists of about 25 specially designed vehicles or Each orbiter is processed independently using units and a team of about 150 trained personnel, NASA some of whom assist the crew in disembarking from the orbiter. the orbiter and a “white room” is mated to the orbiter hatch. The The others quickly begin the processes necessary to “safe” the hatch is opened and a physician performs a brief preliminary orbiter and prepare it for towing to the Orbiter Processing Fa- medical examination of the crew members before they leave the cility.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Spaceport
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration America’s Spaceport www.nasa.gov America’s Spaceport John F. Kennedy Space Center “This generation does not intend to founder in the backwash of the coming age of space. We mean to be a part of it — we mean to lead it.” President John Fitzgerald Kennedy September 12, 1962 he John F. Kennedy Space Center — America’s Spaceport — is the doorway to upon Spanish treasure ships laden with riches from space. From its unique facilities, humans and machines have begun the exploration the mines of Mexico and Peru. Shoals, reefs and T of the solar system, reaching out to the sun, the moon, the planets and beyond. storms also exacted their toll on the treasure fleets, While these spectacular achievements have fired the imagination of people throughout leaving behind a sunken bonanza now being reaped the world and enriched the lives of millions, they represent only a beginning. At America’s by modern-day treasure hunters. Spaceport, humanity’s long-cherished dream of establishing permanent outposts on the new space frontier is becoming a reality. By the early 18th century, America’s Spaceport Origins echoed with the footsteps of other intruders: Yet, our leap toward the stars is also an epilogue to a rich and colorful past . an almost English settlers and their Indian allies (the latter to forgotten legacy replete with Indian lore, stalwart adventurers, sunken treasure and hardy become known as the Seminoles) from colonies in pioneers. Georgia and South Carolina. Thus began a new era of conflict and expansion that ouldw continue until The sands of America’s Spaceport bear the imprint of New World history from its earliest the end of the Second U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • + Part 17: Acronyms and Abbreviations (265 Kb PDF)
    17. Acronyms and Abbreviations °C . Degrees.Celsius °F. Degrees.Fahrenheit °R . Degrees.Rankine 24/7. 24.Hours/day,.7.days/week 2–D. Two-Dimensional 3C. Command,.Control,.and.Checkout 3–D. Three-Dimensional 3–DOF . Three-Degrees.of.Freedom 6-DOF. Six-Degrees.of.Freedom A&E. Architectural.and.Engineering ACEIT. Automated.Cost-Estimating.Integrated.Tools ACES . Acceptance.and.Checkout.Evaluation.System ACP. Analytical.Consistency.Plan ACRN. Assured.Crew.Return.Vehicle ACRV. Assured.Crew.Return.Vehicle AD. Analog.to.Digital ADBS. Advanced.Docking.Berthing.System ADRA. Atlantic.Downrange.Recovery.Area AEDC. Arnold.Engineering.Development.Center AEG . Apollo.Entry.Guidance AETB. Alumina.Enhanced.Thermal.Barrier AFB .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Air.Force.Base AFE. Aero-assist.Flight.Experiment AFPG. Apollo.Final.Phase.Guidance AFRSI. Advanced.Flexible.Reusable.Surface.Insulation AFV . Anti-Flood.Valve AIAA . American.Institute.of.Aeronautics.and.Astronautics AL. Aluminum ALARA . As.Low.As.Reasonably.Achievable 17. Acronyms and Abbreviations 731 AL-Li . Aluminum-Lithium ALS. Advanced.Launch.System ALTV. Approach.and.Landing.Test.Vehicle AMS. Alpha.Magnetic.Spectrometer AMSAA. Army.Material.System.Analysis.Activity AOA . Analysis.of.Alternatives AOD. Aircraft.Operations.Division APAS . Androgynous.Peripheral.Attachment.System APS. Auxiliary.Propulsion.System APU . Auxiliary.Power.Unit APU . Auxiliary.Propulsion.Unit AR&D. Automated.Rendezvous.and.Docking. ARC . Ames.Research.Center ARF . Assembly/Remanufacturing.Facility ASE. Airborne.Support.Equipment ASI . Augmented.Space.Igniter ASTWG . Advanced.Spaceport.Technology.Working.Group ASTP. Advanced.Space.Transportation.Program AT. Alternate.Turbopump ATCO. Ambient.Temperature.Catalytic.Oxidation ATCS . Active.Thermal.Control.System ATO . Abort-To-Orbit ATP. Authority.to.Proceed ATS. Access.to.Space ATV . Automated.Transfer.Vehicles ATV .
    [Show full text]
  • Processing the Shuttle for Flight
    Processing When taking a road trip, it is important to plan ahead by making sure your vehicle is prepared for the journey. A typical road trip on Earth can be the Shuttle for routine and simple. The roadways are already properly paved, service Flight stations are available if vehicle repairs are needed, and food, lodging, and stores for other supplies can also be found. The same, however, could not be said for a Space Shuttle trip into space. The difficulties associated with Steven Sullivan space travel are complex compared with those we face when traveling here. Preparing the Shuttle for Flight Food, lodging, supplies, and repair equipment must be provided for within Ground Processing the space vehicle. Jennifer Hall Peter Nickolenko Vehicle preparation required a large amount of effort to restore the shuttle Jorge Rivera to nearly new condition each time it flew. Since it was a reusable vehicle Edith Stull Steven Sullivan with high technical performance requirements, processing involved a Space Operations Weather tremendous amount of “hands-on” labor; no simple tune-up here. Not only Francis Merceret was the shuttle’s exterior checked and repaired for its next flight, all Robert Scully components and systems within the vehicle were individually inspected and Terri Herst verified to be functioning correctly. This much detail work was necessary Steven Sullivan because a successful flight was dependent on proper vehicle assembly. Robert Youngquist During a launch attempt, decisions were made within milliseconds by equipment and systems that had to perform accurately the first time—there was no room for hesitation or error.
    [Show full text]
  • 24. CRAWLER TRANSPORTER STEERING and JEL SYSTEMS by Virgil Leon Davis John F
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19760012108 2020-03-22T16:53:17+00:00Z 24. CRAWLER TRANSPORTER STEERING AND JEL SYSTEMS By Virgil Leon Davis John F. Kennedy Space Center SUMMARY A vital element to Launch Complex 39 and the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) mobile transfer operation is a culmination of many unique engineering mech­ anisms known as the Crawler Transporter. The Transporter is a mighty tortoise weighing 2.8 million kilograms (6.3 million pounds) used to lift a S.7-million -kilogram (12.6-million-pound) combination of Mobile Launcher and space vehicle, transfer this load approximately 5.6 kilometers (3.5 miles) from its point of assembly, negotiate curves of l52-meter (500-foot) mean radius, climb a 5-percent grade while maintaining the 122-meter (400-foot) structure in a verti­ cal position within 10 minutes of are, and smoothly position this huge structure to within +5.1 centimeters (+ 2 inches) on support pedestals at the launch pad. - INTRODUCTION There are some unique mechanisms in the hydraulic jacking, equalization, leveling (JEL), and steering systems required by the Crawler to perform its mission. Numerous problems associated with these mechanisms have been over­ come in a program requiring fabrication of operational equipment while proceed­ ing with a developmental process. This was necessary since complete data did not exist in some phases of the design prior to construction. Besides, such an independent transporter system had never been built, and today only two such systems are in existence. PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS The primary impetus behind the selection of the Crawler Transporter as the prime mover during the development of facilities for the Saturn V space vehi­ cle in 1962 was the fabrication of a similar device--a 76.2-meter (250-foot) high, 8.16-million-kilogram (18-million-pound) stripping shovel.
    [Show full text]
  • STS Derivative Cargo Vehicles for the 1990'S Decade and Beyond
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 1990 (27th) 90's - Decade Of Opportunity Apr 26th, 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM Paper Session III-A - STS Derivative Cargo Vehicles for the 1990's Decade and Beyond Billy W. Shelton National Aeronautics and Space Administration George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, Alabama 35812 Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Shelton, Billy W., "Paper Session III-A - STS Derivative Cargo Vehicles for the 1990's Decade and Beyond" (1990). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 15. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1990-27th/april-26-1990/15 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STS Derivative Cargo Vehicles for the 1990*$ Decade and Beyond Billy W. Shelton National Aeronautics and Space Administration George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, Alabama 35812 Abstract Currently planned U.S. civil space activities for the late 1990's into the early 2000 time period will require the development of a new earth-to-orbit unmanned cargo vehicle(s). This system will be designed to support an aggressive space activity, including Space Station Freedom and eventually lunar/planetary exploration programs. Primary mission needs include increased cargo weight and volume capability and lower operating costs. A mid-90's unmannedcargo vehicle (Shuttle C), which utilizes existing space-qualified STS booster elements, is currently being designed for delivery of 100K-150K Ibs to low earth orbit.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Outpost the Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon Erik Seedhouse Lunar Outpost the Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon
    Lunar Outpost The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon Erik Seedhouse Lunar Outpost The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon Published in association with Praxis Publishing Chichester, UK Dr Erik Seedhouse, F.B.I.S., As.M.A. Milton Ontario Canada SPRINGER±PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION SUBJECT ADVISORY EDITOR: John Mason, M.Sc., B.Sc., Ph.D. ISBN 978-0-387-09746-6 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Springer is part of Springer-Science + Business Media (springer.com) Library of Congress Control Number: 2008934751 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. # Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2009 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a speci®c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: Jim Wilkie Project management: Originator Publishing Services, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK Printed on acid-free paper Contents Preface ............................................. xiii Acknowledgments ...................................... xvii About the author....................................... xix List of ®gures ........................................ xxi List of tables ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crawler-Transporters Fact Sheet
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Crawler-Transporters Crawler-Transporter Able to raise and lower its sides and corners inde- pendently, the crawlers are designed to roll under- A pair of behemoth machines called crawler-trans- neath a mobile launcher (ML), pick it up and steadily porters have carried the load of taking rockets and carry it 4.2 miles to Launch Pad 39B. Because each spacecraft to the launch pad for more than 50 years pad is built atop a sloping pyramid, the crawler uses at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. its hydraulic suspension to keep the platform level all the way to the top where it sets the platform in place Each larger than the size of a baseball infield and so the vehicle can lift off safely. powered by locomotive and large electrical power facts generator engines, the crawler-transporters stand ready to keep up the work for the next generation Crawler-Transporter 2 of launch vehicles that will lift astronauts into space. Kennedy has upgraded one of its two massive crawl- er transporters as the agency continues to prepare The crawlers are unique in the world, having been built for its journey to the Moon and Mars under the Ar- in 1965 to move the massive Saturn V rocket from temis program. Crawler-transporter 2 (CT-2) is more Kennedy’s Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) to Launch than 50 years old, but with the current modifications Complex 39. After the Moon landing and Skylab pro- conducted by the Exploration Ground Systems (EGS) grams ended, the crawlers continued their work, tak- Program, CT-2 is expected to be in service for many ing space shuttles to their launch pads for 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Building KSC's Launch Complex 39
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Building KSC’s Launch Complex 39 n the beginning, there was sand and house the Apollo spacecraft and the Launch I palmettos and water. Yet out of this idyllic Control Center. setting would grow the most unique structures The launcher-transporter would incorpo- -- engineering milestones -- that would set the rate three major facilities: a pedestal for the stage for the future in space. space vehicle, an umbilical tower to service The Kennedy Space Center of the 21st the upper reaches of the space vehicle, and a century began life in the early 1960s when new rail transporter. An arming tower would stand facilities were needed to launch the moon- about midway between the assembly building facts bound Saturn V rockets. and the pads. Initial plans called for a launch complex The Apollo Saturn would carry a number comprising a Vertical Assembly Building of hazardous explosives: the launch escape sys- (VAB), a launcher-transporter, an arming area tem (the tower on top of the vehicle that lifted and a launch pad. The VAB would consist of the spacecraft away from the launch vehicle in assembly bay areas for each of the stages, with case of an emergency), retrorockets to sepa- a high-bay unit approximately 110 meters in rate the stages, ullage rockets to force fuel to height for final assembly and checkout of the the bottom of tanks, and the launch vehicle’s vehicle. Buildings adjacent to the VAB would destruct system. Launch Pad 39A is under construction (foreground) with the imposing Vertical Assembly Building rising from the sand in the background.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNMENT Experience NASA Launch Complex 39B | John F
    GOVERNMENT experience NASA Launch Complex 39B | John F. Kennedy Space Center, FL A ‘pick’ demolition approach with long reach equipment ensured that debris did not drop from high above LVI safely completed structural demolition and hazardous Space Shuttle Launch Pad material abatement at John F. Kennedy Space Center’s Launch Complex 39B. The structure was first used in 1969 June 2010 - September 2011 to launch the Saturn 5 rocket on the Apollo 10 mission as a dress rehearsal for the historic Apollo 11 lunar landing. $1,546,345 Over nearly four decades, launch complex 39B ferried crews to the Skylab space NASA station, as well as the famed joint U.S./Soviet Apollo/Soyuz Saturn spacecraft in 1975. After undergoing extensive reconstruction, the launch pad facility prepared 53 space shuttle missions between 1986 and 2006, beginning with the final launch of the ill-fated space shuttle, Challenger. Hazardous Material Abatement NASA officially deactivated launch complex 39B on January 1, 2007, making the De- cember 9, 2006 nighttime launch of STS-116 its last shuttle mission. It was subse- Structural Demolition quently used in April and May of 2009, when space shuttle Endeavour sat on the pad poised for a potential rescue mission that was not needed. Zero OSHA Recordables RE-STRUCTURING FOR COMMERCIAL USE LVI’s demolition efforts supported NASA’s plans to restructure the system into a more versatile ‘clean pad’ design, to allow commercial vehicles to use their own launcher. LVI carefully designed a technical approach to dismantle the Fixed Service GOVERNMENT experience Fixed Service Structure (left) & Rotating Service Structure (right) before demo Nearing demolition completion Structure (FSS) and the Rotating Service Structure (RSS) since ties abutted up to a large 53-foot deep flame trench that ran the facility’s concrete pad surface, lightning tower protection down the middle of the pad.
    [Show full text]