DOCSLIB.ORG

6.3 Lightning Protection at the Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6.3 Lightning Protection at the Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station 6.3 LIGHTNING PROTECTION AT THE KENNEDY SPACE CENTER AND CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION Pedro J. Medelius * Dynacs, Inc., Kennedy Space Center, Florida William P. Roeder 45th Weather Squadron, USAF, Patrick AFB, Florida J. Willingham NASA, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 1. INTRODUCTION 2. LIGHTNING MEASUREMENTS AT THE SPACE SHUTTLE LAUNCH PADS Frequent lightning activity in Florida has resulted in the need for effective lightning protection systems at the The Kennedy Space Center is located in a region with Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and at Cape Canaveral significant lightning activity. The possibility of a lightning Air Force Station (CCAFS). Critical flight hardware, strike at the surface or aloft is a hazard that must be such as the Space Shuttle vehicle launched from KSC avoided during launches and during ground activities. and the expendable launch vehicles (ELV’s) launched Lightning activity at the Space Shuttle launch pads is from CCAFS, must be protected against direct lightning monitored in several ways. Local instrumentation and strikes, including their indirect effects, and the effects of remote measurements provide an indication of lightning nearby strikes. Electronic equipment is susceptible to strike locations and induced voltages or currents into damage when exposed to voltage beyond safe limits. conductors. Lightning strikes, which usually carry currents on the order of several thousand amperes, generate large A network of magnetic direction finder antennas is used magnetic fields with fast rise and decay times. These to locate ground strikes in the KSC area. Individual fast varying electric and magnetic fields result in antennas provide an azimuth angle to a particular induced voltages and currents on any conductor, which, lightning strike, and the location is determined by the if attached to an electronic device, can cause immediate intersection of the azimuth lines from different antennas. failure of the device, or cause lesser damage which can The accuracy of the system is in the order of a few significantly reduce its lifetime. An even more hundred meters within the KSC area. dangerous situation could result from a direct lightning attachment to an explosive or flammable device in a The Lightning Detection and Ranging (LDAR) system space vehicle or a storage facility. has shown to be highly useful to the spacecraft launch community in reducing the hazards associated with Statistical and probability studies of lightning strike and lightning activity, through a combination of effective damage data performed at KSC/CCAFS over the years detection and display technologies. The system was have resulted in a comprehensive set of lightning designed to map the location of intracloud and cloud-to- protection systems and methods. For instance, different ground lightning based on the time of arrival of the techniques have been applied to KSC’s launch pad electromagnetic radiation. The location system consists structures to estimate the lightning protection of 7 VHF radio receivers centered at 66 MHz., and effectiveness for the gaseous oxygen vent arm. In- displays intracloud lightning activity in real-time. depth studies of indirect effects caused by nearby lightning strikes have also affected the lightning A lightning strike location method currently in use at the protection criteria.* Studies have also been made to pads involves the use of a set of video cameras pointing determine the magnetic field environment in and around at different locations within the Pad. If a lightning strike the Payload Changeout Room (PCR) of the Space occurs within the field of view of three or more cameras, Shuttle when the complex is struck by lightning. the location of the strike can be determined. However, if the cameras are not pointing in the correct direction, or their field of view is obscured by either the Pad structure or by a heavy downpour, the determination of the striking point becomes difficult, and in some cases * Corresponding author address: Pedro J. Medelius, impossible. There is often an uncertainty as far as the Dynacs, Inc., M/S DNX-10, Kennedy Space Center, FL location of the exact point of contact to the ground. A 32899; e-mail: pedro.medelius [email protected] new, very accurate, lightning location system is being Nevertheless, there have been instances when a implemented at the Launch Pads. The Sonic Lightning lightning flash has traveled past the catenary wire Location (SOLLO) system is based on the use of both protection system and has directly struck the launch pad electric field and thunder measurements, and can structure. The effectiveness of the catenary wire achieve 5-meter accuracy for lightning strikes within the protection was studied and modeled by Stahmann (1). pad perimeter. The SOLLO System will enable the The study provided the probability of lightning striking users to accurately determine the attachment point of a different points of the pad structure past the catenary lightning strike. This will provide important information wire protection, and resulted in a probability of one that can be used to determine if any equipment and/or strike to the Space Shuttle vehicle once every 100 instrumentation needs to be retested or evaluated for years. hidden damage. Measurements of induced voltages are conducted using transient recorders connected to selected power and communication cables. The Lightning Induced Voltage Instrumentation System (LIVIS) consist of a fast sampling recorder with deep memory storage, which allows for the recording of multiple strikes within a lightning flash with high temporal resolution. Voltages and currents from direct lightning strikes on the launch pads’ catenary wire lightning protection are also monitored. The Catenary Wire Lightning Instrumentation System (CWLIS) is used to measure the current on the catenary wire following a direct lightning strike. Occasionally, nearby lightning dis charges induce enough current into the catenary wire for the CWLIS to detect and measure it. Portable, self contained, wideband electric and magnetic field sensors can be placed at selected locations to evaluate the intensity of the electromagnetic fields during a thunderstorm. These sensors record and store waveforms to be used for detailed analysis of the shielding effectiveness of the pad structure. 3. LIGHTNING PROTECTION AT KSC AND AT CCAFS Protection for personnel and equipment is of utmost Figure 1. Space Shuttle launch pad lightning protection importance at KSC and CCAFS. Warnings are issued mast. when lightning activity is expected in the area, and when A comprehensive study was performed to understand lightning activity is in progress. Warnings allow personnel to evacuate a dangerous area during a and identify the risks to payloads as they are brought thunderstorm, and to secure the area if needed to into position at the PCR, loaded in to the cargo bay of reduce the potential for lightning damage to equipment the Space Shuttle Orbiter, and checked out prior to and instrumentation. flight. The results of analysis using numerical techniques were compared against measurements Lightning protection at the Space Shuttle launch pads is performed using a lightning simulator used to inject a provided primarily by a 70-foot insulating fiberglass mast large current into the catenary wire. It was concluded 5 feet in diameter located on the Fixed Service Structure that as long as the Orbiter was grounded to the PCR, it with a lightning rod at the top of the mast, as shown in was unlikely that a lightning flash to the catenary wire would cause enough voltage to present a hazard to Figure 1. A catenary wire running from the top of the mast to grounding points 1000 feet to the north and personnel in the PCR. However, there could be enough south of the tower is used to direct the current away voltage to cause damage to electrical and electronic from the pad structure. The lightning protection mast is equipment not properly grounded and shielded either on the PCR or on a payload (2). struck an average of three times per year. The goal is to provide a more effective protection of the Protection against direct lightning strikes has also been spacecraft from direct and indirect lightning effects and implemented at selected facilities at KSC and at improve the prediction capability of induced voltages, CCAFS, as shown in Figure 2. Overhead grounded currents and electromagnetic fields on the spacecraft protective grids are used at various installations to hardware. protect equipment and personnel working underneath. Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) pads, such as the Analysis of the potential for damage inside ELV Titan IV, are protected in a similar way. processing buildings is also in progress. Metallic high bay buildings with open ends can behave as resonant cavities, thus resulting in large electromagnetic fields inside. Coupling of these fields into power and communication conductors can result in voltages large enough to damage electronic equipment. The outcome of the study is expected to provide a better understanding of the magnitude of the fields that can be expected inside such structures. These results can be used to determine ways to improve the shielding effectiveness and to minimize potential damage to sensitive components. 5. CONCLUSIONS The design of lightning protection methods, lightning sensing equipment, and lightning location systems is an ongoing process at KSC and CCAFS. The unique nature of the space-related activities, coupled with the relatively high incidence of lightning activity in the central Florida area, has resulted in increased attention to lightning and its direct and indirect effects. Analysis Figure 2. Lightning protection masts and overhead of data collected over the years, as well as that obtained protective grid for the Titan IV launch pad at CCAFS. from new measurements is expected to result in better protection systems for both personnel and equipment. 4. PLANNED STUDIES 6. REFERENCES The understanding of the effects of transient voltages and currents induced into conductors is important to allow for the design of protection systems for flight (1) Stahmann, J.R., Launch Pad Lightning Protection hardware and for personnel working in the area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Pad Constructed for Smaller Rocket Launches
    PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS • JULY 2015 At NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the Ground Systems Development and Operations (GSDO) Program Office is leading the center’s transfor- mation from a historically government-only launch complex to a spaceport bustling with activity involving government and commercial vehicles alike. GSDO is tasked with developing and using the complex equipment required to safely handle a variety of rockets and spacecraft during assembly, transport and launch. For more information about GSDO accomplishments happening around the center, visit http://go.nasa.gov/groundsystems. New Pad Constructed for Smaller Rocket Launches NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida took another step forward in its transformation to a 21st century multi-user spaceport with the completion of the new Small Class Vehicle Launch Pad, designated 39C, in the Launch Pad 39B area. This designated pad to test smaller rockets will make it more affordable for smaller aerospace companies to develop and launch from the center, and to break into the commercial spaceflight market. Kennedy Director Bob Cabana and representatives from the Ground Systems Development and Operations (GSDO) Program and the Center Planning and Development (CPD) and Engineering Directorates marked the completion of the new pad during a ribbon-cutting ceremony July 17. NASA Kennedy Space Center Director Bob Cabana, center, helps cut the ribbon on the new Small Class Vehicle Launch Pad, designated 39C, at Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Also helping to cut the ribbon are, from left, Pat Simpkins, director, Engineering and Technology Directorate; Rich Koller, senior vice president of design firm Jones Edmunds; Scott Col- loredo, director, Center Planning and Development; and Michelle Shoultz, president of Frazier Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • 1993 (179Kb Pdf)
    February 4, 1993 KSC Contact: Bruce Buckingham KSC Release No. 10-93 Notice To Editors/News Directors: KSC NEWS CENTER OFFICE HOURS FOR PEGASUS ARRIVAL The NASA B-52 aircraft carrying the Orbital Sciences Cor- poration Pegasus rocket is scheduled to arrive at KSC on Sunday, Feb. 7, with launch targeted for Feb. 9. The aircraft is currently scheduled to depart Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., at about 10:00 a.m. EST on Sunday with a single refueling stopover planned at Sheppard AFB, Texas. If weather permits, arrival of the aircraft at KSC's Shuttle Landing Facility should be about 4:30 p.m. EST. Status updates regarding the cross-country flight will be made on KSC's codaphone over the weekend. This can be reached by calling 407/867-2525. Public Affairs officers will be in the KSC Press Site office by 9:30 a.m. Sunday in order to provide status updates by phone. The office, however, will not officially open until it is deter- mined the aircraft will in fact be arriving at KSC. If it is determined that the aircraft will be successful in completing the day-long trip to KSC on Sunday, the office will officially open at 3:00 p.m. In that event, media interested in viewing the B-52/Pegasus arrival should plan on calling the KSC news center at 407/867-2468 for departure times to the Shuttle Landing Facility. News media who do not possess current credentials must con- tact the Public Information Office before close of business Friday, Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Brevard County
    Table of Contents Electricity .……………………………...2 Utilities ………………………………....3 Department of Motor Vehicles ………4 Housing & Public Transportation...….5 Medical Services……………………...6 Area Hospitals………………………...7 Post Offices……………………………8 Public Libraries………………………..9 Law Enforcement……………………10 ELECTRICITY Florida Power & Light Co. (FPL) FPL requires a deposit that varies according to customer’s credit rating. An initial services charge is included on the first bill. A certificate of occupancy following an electrical inspection is required for first time service. To receive FPL service, contact: Customer Service: (321) 723-7795 or go to: www.fpl.com Back to Contents Gas, Water, Sewer, Trash Florida City Gas supplies natural gas to most of Brevard. For Customer Service: 800-993-7546 or go to: www.floridacitygas.com Water Sewer & Trash services are provided by City. Cocoa: For Customer Service: (321) 433-8400 or go to: www.cocoafl.org Melbourne: For Customer Service: (321) 953-6390 or go to: www.melbourneflorida.org Titusville: For Customer Service: (321) 383-5775 or go to: www.titusville.com Palm Bay: For Customer Service: (321) 952-3420 or go to: www.palmbayflorida.org Back to Contents DRIVER’S LICENSE, VEHICLE REGISTRATION, TAG, & TITLE SERVICES For details about how to obtain Florida Driver’s License Go to: http://www.hsmv.state.fl.us/html/dlnew.html Now, you can take appointment online for driver licenses, driving tests, & Florida ID cards Go to: http://www.hsmv.state.fl.us/offices/brevard.html This web page also provides links to:- Motor Vehicle Services at Brevard county Tax Collector’s office for your vehicle registration, tag, and titles.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Construct and Operate a Satellite Launching Facility on Christmas Island
    Environment Assessment Report PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A SATELLITE LAUNCHING FACILITY ON CHRISTMAS ISLAND Environment Assessment Branch 2 May 2000 Christmas Island Satellite Launch Facility Proposal Environment Assessment Report - Environment Assessment Branch – May 2000 3 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................6 1.1 GENERAL ...........................................................................................................6 1.2 ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT............................................................................7 1.3 THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS ...............................................................................7 1.4 MAJOR ISSUES RAISED DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ON THE DRAFT EIS .................................................................................................................9 1.4.1 Socio-economic......................................................................................10 1.4.2 Biodiversity............................................................................................10 1.4.3 Roads and infrastructure .....................................................................11 1.4.4 Other.......................................................................................................12 2 NEED FOR THE PROJECT AND KEY ALTERNATIVES ......................14 2.1 NEED FOR THE PROJECT ..................................................................................14 2.2 KEY
    [Show full text]
  • Constellation Program Overview
    Constellation Program Overview October 2008 hris Culbert anager, Lunar Surface Systems Project Office ASA/Johnson Space Center Constellation Program EarthEarth DepartureDeparture OrionOrion -- StageStage CrewCrew ExplorationExploration VehicleVehicle AresAres VV -- HeavyHeavy LiftLift LaunchLaunch VehicleVehicle AltairAltair LunarLunar LanderLander AresAres II -- CrewCrew LaunchLaunch VehicleVehicle Lunar Capabilities Concept Review EstablishedEstablished Lunar Lunar Transportation Transportation EstablishEstablish Lunar Lunar Surface SurfaceArchitecturesArchitectures ArchitectureArchitecture Point Point of of Departure: Departure: StrategiesStrategies which: which: Satisfy NASA NGO’s to acceptable degree ProvidesProvides crew crew & & cargo cargo delivery delivery to to & & from from the the Satisfy NASA NGO’s to acceptable degree within acceptable schedule moonmoon within acceptable schedule Are consistent with capacity and capabilities ProvidesProvides capacity capacity and and ca capabilitiespabilities consistent consistent Are consistent with capacity and capabilities withwith candidate candidate surface surface architectures architectures ofof the the transportation transportation systems systems ProvidesProvides sufficient sufficient performance performance margins margins IncludeInclude set set of of options options fo for rvarious various prioritizations prioritizations of cost, schedule & risk RemainsRemains within within programmatic programmatic constraints constraints of cost, schedule & risk ResultsResults in in acceptable
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download
    www.arianespace.com www.starsem.com www.avio Arianespace’s eighth launch of 2021 with the fifth Soyuz of the year will place its satellite passengers into low Earth orbit. The launcher will be carrying a total payload of approximately 5 518 kg. The launch will be performed from Baikonur, in Kazakhstan. MISSION DESCRIPTION 2 ONEWEB SATELLITES 3 Liftoff is planned on at exactly: SOYUZ LAUNCHER 4 06:23 p.m. Washington, D.C. time, 10:23 p.m. Universal time (UTC), LAUNCH CAMPAIGN 4 00:23 a.m. Paris time, FLIGHT SEQUENCES 5 01:23 a.m. Moscow time, 03:23 a.m. Baikonur Cosmodrome. STAKEHOLDERS OF A LAUNCH 6 The nominal duration of the mission (from liftoff to separation of the satellites) is: 3 hours and 45 minutes. Satellites: OneWeb satellite #255 to #288 Customer: OneWeb • Altitude at separation: 450 km Cyrielle BOUJU • Inclination: 84.7degrees [email protected] +33 (0)6 32 65 97 48 RUAG Space AB (Linköping, Sweden) is the prime contractor in charge of development and production of the dispenser system used on Flight ST34. It will carry the satellites during their flight to low Earth orbit and then release them into space. The dedicated dispenser is designed to Flight ST34, the 29th commercial mission from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan performed by accommodate up to 36 spacecraft per launch, allowing Arianespace and its Starsem affiliate, will put 34 of OneWeb’s satellites bringing the total fleet to 288 satellites Arianespace to timely deliver the lion’s share of the initial into a near-polar orbit at an altitude of 450 kilometers.
    [Show full text]
  • Silencing Nasa's Space Shuttle Crawler
    SILENCING NASA’S SPACE SHUTTLE CRAWLER TRANSPORTER R. MacDonalda, C. Faszerb, and R. Margasahayamc aNoise Solutions Inc., #310 605 – 1st Street SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3S9 bFaszer Farquharson & Associates, #304 605 – 1st Street SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3S9 cNASA, John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida, United States of America 32899 [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract. The crawler transporter (CT) is the world’s second largest known tracked vehicle, weighing 6 million pounds with a length of 131 feet and a width of 113 feet. The Kennedy Space Center (KSC) has two CTs that were designed and built for the Apollo program in the 1960’s, maintained and retrofitted for use in the Space Shuttle program. As a key element of the Space Shuttle ground systems, the crawler transports the entire 12-million-pound stack comprising the orbiter, the mobile launch platform (MLP), the external tank (ET), and the solid rocket boosters (SRB) from the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) to the launch pad. This rollout, constituting a 3.5 to 5.0 mile journey at a top speed of 0.9 miles-per-hour, requires over 8 hours to reach either Launch Complex 39A or B. This activity is only a prelude to the spectacle of sound and fury of the Space Shuttle launch to orbit in less than 10 minutes and traveling at orbital velocities of Mach 24. This paper summarizes preliminary results from the Crawler Transporter Sound Attenuation Study, encompassing test and engineering analysis of significant sound sources to measure and record full frequency spectrum and intensity of the various noise sources and to analyze the potential for noise mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Operations
    7. Operations 7.1 Ground Operations The Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS) team addressed the launch site integra- tion of the exploration systems. The team was fortunate to draw on expertise from members with historical and contemporary human space flight program experience including the Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, Apollo Soyuz Test Project, Shuttle, and International Space Station (ISS) programs, as well as from members with ground operations experience reaching back to the Redstone, Jupiter, Pershing, and Titan launch vehicle programs. The team had a wealth of experience in both management and technical responsibilities and was able to draw on recent ground system concepts and other engineering products from the Orbital Space Plane (OSP) and Space Launch Initiative (SLI) programs, diverse X-vehicle projects, and leadership in NASA/Industry/Academia groups such as the Space Propulsion Synergy Team (SPST) and the Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group (ASTWG). 7.1.1 Ground Operations Summary The physical and functional integration of the proposed exploration architecture elements will occur at the primary launch site at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC). In order to support the ESAS recommendation of the use of a Shuttle-derived Cargo Launch Vehicle (CaLV) and a separate Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) for lunar missions and the use of a CLV for ISS missions, KSC’s Launch Complex 39 facilities and ground equipment were selected for conversion. Ground-up replacement of the pads, assembly, refurbishment, and/or process- ing facilities was determined to be too costly and time-consuming to design, build, outfit, activate, and certify in a timely manner to support initial test flights leading to an operational CEV/CLV system by 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Launching Orion Into Space
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration LAUNCHING ORION INTO SPACE LAUNCHING ORION 27,000 MPH Speed to propel into Space to Deep Space Learn about the tremendous effort put forth by thousands of people across the country to launch Orion into orbit, and the challenges that will be faced as Orion 17,500 MPH is prepared for flight. Orion separating from the launch vehicle Orion has been designed Flight tests are difficult and There are thousands of Separation events that are with the minimal mass and complex but are necessary for steps that must be carried critical during Orion’s first few maximum capability needed engineers to gain confidence out sequentially – or even minutes of spaceflight are very to safely transport everything that the systems critical to simultaneously – and function dynamic, requiring the close needed for four crew crew safety will work during in perfect harmony for a attention of the entire members to live and work in space flight. seamless launch. flight team. space for up to 21 days. E SPAC N OF ITIO FIN ES) DE MIL THE JOURNEY TO THE LAUNCH PAD LAUNCHING ORION (62 DESIGNING ORION PUTTING ORION SENDING ORION THROUGH PUSHING ORION TO THE TEST THE ATMOSPHERE INTO DEEP SPACE Orion accelerating through Earth’s atmosphere Orion on the launch pad O MPH at NASA’s multi-purpose AN ENGINEER’S MAGNUM OPUS RIGOROUS TESTING PRIOR TO FLIGHT OVERCOMING EARTH’S GRAVITY ACHIEVING SUCCESS spaceport in Florida www.nasa.gov Challenges of Spaceflight: Putting Orion to the Test Spaceflight Stage Fright Launching Orion into Space The Orion spacecraft is comprised of the crew module, On Orion’s way to orbit, there are a series of events where astronauts will live and work during the mission; that must occur to separate the spacecraft from the Orion is America’s next-generation spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Official MISSION KIT We Will Turn Our Faces to the Sun, and Our Dreams to the Stars
    official MISSION KIT We will turn our faces to the sun, and our dreams to the stars. We will take selfies with America’s icons, and shake hands with its heroes. We will marvel at humanity’s past, and glimpse AT what its future holds. We will explore everything from the Atlantic to Atlantis, stopping only to watch the sun go down and the rockets go up. Most of all, we will collect experiences just as surely as we collect shells. Because we are Vacationauts. And in Florida, more than anywhere else in the world, wE ARE GO. MEDIA CONTACTS Florida: Tara Tufo, 646.468.8834, [email protected] NYC: Terry Preston, 917.494.5313, [email protected] BE A VACATIONAUT! 4 MULTI-MEDIA CAMPAIGN 7 The VACATIONAUT COMMUNITY 8 BADGES, RANKS and MORE 13 DESTINATION SPACE: COLLECTIBLE POSTERS 25 The FUTURE of SPACE TOURISM is NEAR 28 KNOW Your LAUNCH VEHICLES 30 SPACE TIMELINE 32 The WORLD’S GATEWAY to SPACE 35 ATLANTIC to ATLANTIS 36 ABOUT WE ARE GO 39 ABOUT SPACE FLORIDA 40 ABOUT PARADISE ADVERTISING 43 All DIGITAL ASSETS ARE LOCATED ON ENCLOSED USB CARD 3 BE A VACATIONAUT! The quest to explore space has inspired countless generations, and this pursuit is still alive and thriving in Florida — America’s iconic launch pad to the stars. The desire to break one’s earthly bonds is the foundation of We Are Go’s new Vacationauts campaign. 4 We Are Go, Space Florida’s consumer facing brand, is looking for the next generation of recreational space explorers — the Vacationauts! Their mission is to make space a part of their epic Florida vacation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 19Th International Lightning Detection Conference
    19th International Lightning Detection Conference 24-25 April • Tucson, Arizona, USA 1st International Lightning Meteorology Conference 2006 26-27 April • Tucson, Arizona, USA LIGHTNING PROBABILITY FORECASTS AT KENNEDY SPACE CENTER/CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, FLORIDA Winfred Lambert* and Mark Wheeler ENSCO, Inc/Applied Meteorology Unit Cocoa Beach, FL William Roeder USAF 45th Weather Squadron 1. INTRODUCTION 2005 lightning season. In order to use the complex equations, the AMU provided a graphical user The 45th Weather Squadron (45 WS) provides interface (GUI) that the forecasters could use to comprehensive weather services to America’s input the required parameter values and output the space program at Cape Canaveral Air Force probability of lightning occurrence for the day. Station (CCAFS) and Kennedy Space Center (KSC). Two of the services provided by the 45 WS are the daily 24-Hour and Weekly Planning Forecasts, both of which include a probability of lightning occurrence. This information is used for general planning of operations at CCAFS and KSC. These facilities are located in east-central Florida at the east end of ‘Lightning Alley’, seen in Figure 1 as the red area oriented southwest to northeast across the center of Florida. The current lightning probability forecast is based on a subjective analysis of model and observational data and the output from a new objective lightning forecast tool (Lambert et al. 2005, Lambert and Wheeler 2005) developed by the Applied Meteorology Unit (AMU) (Bauman et al. 2004). This paper describes the new lightning probability Figure 1. Mean annual lightning flash density forecast tool and on-going efforts to improve its across the continental U.S., 1989 – 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbiter Processing Facility
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Shuttle: Orbiter Processing From Landing To Launch he work of preparing a space shuttle for the same facilities. Inside is a description of an flight takes place primarily at the Launch orbiter processing flow; in this case, Discovery. Complex 39 Area. TThe process actually begins at the end of each acts Shuttle Landing Facility flight, with a landing at the center or, after landing At the end of its mission, the Space Shuttle f at an alternate site, the return of the orbiter atop a Discovery lands at the Shuttle Landing Facility on shuttle carrier aircraft. Kennedy’s Shuttle Landing one of two runway headings – Runway 15 extends Facility is the primary landing site. from the northwest to the southeast, and Runway There are now three orbiters in the shuttle 33 extends from the southeast to the northwest fleet: Discovery, Atlantis and Endeavour. Chal- – based on wind currents. lenger was destroyed in an accident in January After touchdown and wheelstop, the orbiter 1986. Columbia was lost during approach to land- convoy is deployed to the runway. The convoy ing in February 2003. consists of about 25 specially designed vehicles or Each orbiter is processed independently using units and a team of about 150 trained personnel, NASA some of whom assist the crew in disembarking from the orbiter. the orbiter and a “white room” is mated to the orbiter hatch. The The others quickly begin the processes necessary to “safe” the hatch is opened and a physician performs a brief preliminary orbiter and prepare it for towing to the Orbiter Processing Fa- medical examination of the crew members before they leave the cility.
    [Show full text]