FY 2015-2020 Proposed Multi-Modal Transportation Improvement Program
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Commuter Parking Study
Commuter Parking Study River Forest, Illinois Source: Metra Source: CTA Source: Google Source: Steve Schering/Pioneer Press Prepared For: May 26, 2020 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... iii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Commuter Parking Questionnaire............................................................................................... 3 3. Existing Parking Inventory ......................................................................................................... 5 On-Street Parking Inventory ....................................................................................................... 5 Off-Street Parking Inventory .................................................................................................... 12 4. Existing Parking Utilization ...................................................................................................... 14 On-Street Parking Utilization ................................................................................................... 14 Off-Street Parking Utilization ................................................................................................... 22 5. Parking Analysis & Recommendations .................................................................................... 23 Zone 1 ...................................................................................................................................... -
August 2015 ERA Bulletin.Pub
The ERA BULLETIN - AUGUST, 2015 Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 58, No. 8 August, 2015 The Bulletin TWO ANNIVERSARIES — Published by the Electric SEA BEACH AND STEINWAY TUNNEL Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box The first Brooklyn Rapid Transit (BRT) was incorporated on August 29, 1896. 3323, New York, New steel cars started operating in revenue ser- BRT acquired the company’s stock on or York 10163-3323. N about November 5, 1897. The line was elec- vice on the Sea Beach Line (now ) and the new Fourth Avenue Subway one hundred trified with overhead trolley wire at an un- For general inquiries, years ago, June 22, 1915. Revenue opera- known date. contact us at bulletin@ tion began at noon with trains departing from A March 1, 1907 agreement allowed the erausa.org . ERA’s Chambers Street and Coney Island at the company to operate through service from the website is th www.erausa.org . same time. Two– and three-car trains were Coney Island terminal to 38 Street and New routed via Fourth Avenue local tracks and Utrecht Avenue. Starting 1908 or earlier, nd Editorial Staff: southerly Manhattan Bridge tracks. trains operate via the Sea Beach Line to 62 Editor-in-Chief : On March 31, 1915, Interborough Rapid Street and New Utrecht Avenue, the West Bernard Linder End (now D) Line, and the Fifth Avenue “L.” Tri-State News and Transit, Brooklyn Rapid Transit, and Public Commuter Rail Editor : Service Commission officials attended BRT’s Sea Beach cars were coupled to West End Ronald Yee exhibit of the new B-Type cars, nicknamed or Culver cars. -
December 2020 Project Management Oversight Report
Project Management Oversight December 2020 REPORT ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT – DECEMBER 2020 Executive Summary This semi‐annual Report on Project Management Oversight details Service Board efforts in implementing their capital programs. Included are details on all state‐funded projects, regardless of budget, and all systemwide projects with budgets of $10 million or more, regardless of funding source. Information in this report was collected by direct , interviews project meetings, and documented submissions from Service Board project management teams. The RTA’s 2018‐2023 Regional Transit Strategic Plan, Invest in Transit, highlights $30 billion of projects that are needed to maintain and modernize the region’s transit network. To maintain and preserve the current system in a State of Good Repair (SGR), as well as address the backlog of deferred SGR projects, requires a capital investment of $2 to $3 billion per year. The Rebuild Illinois funding is planned to expedite overdue repair and replacement projects, reduce the backlog of deferred improvements, and move the system toward a state of good repair. It nearly doubles the previous five‐year regional capital program of $4.3 billion. The funds enable real progress on the state of good repair, by allowing improvements and in some cases replace aging system assets. Although this has been a difficult year due to operating funding shortfalls related to COVID‐19, the Service Boards are continuing with the implementation of their capital programs. This report includes, for the first time, 13 Rebuild Illinois projects representing $655 million in Rebuild Illinois funding. The 13 projects reported on have begun during this reporting period and have ongoing activities. -
June 2018 Project Management Oversight Report
June 2018 Project Management Oversight Prepared by the Department of Finance, Innovation & Technology REPORT ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT – JUNE 2018 Executive Summary This semi‐annual Report on Project Management Oversight details Service Board efforts in implementing their capital programs. Included are details on all state‐funded projects, regardless of budget, and all systemwide projects with budgets of $10 million or more, regardless of funding source. Information in this report was collected by direct interviews, project meetings, and documented submissions from Service Board project management teams. The State of Good Repair backlog for the region currently stands at $19.4 billion, and the 10‐ year capital need for normal reinvestment is $18.3 billion, which results in total 10‐year capital need of $37.7 billion. The 60 projects detailed in this report together represent $3,861,547,183 worth of construction, maintenance, and procurement. Many of these projects will address outstanding capital needs, while others are directed to compliance with federal requirements or enhancing customer experience, safety, and security. The majority of state funded projects are within budget, one project is under budget. 80% of the state funded projects are on schedule. Regarding change orders, some of the added budget came from decisions by the Service Boards to add value to projects or comply with federal requirements. Other change orders were mostly for unforeseen conditions, and a minimal amount was due to errors and omissions. There were also change orders that provided credit for value engineering and for unused allowance and deleted work. Although the progress being made on these projects is significant, current capital funding will not support much needed renewal of the region’s aging transit infrastructure. -
RED VEST Issue Campaign
The in this RED VEST issue Campaign = * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION WEEK A New Look at Railroading VJHTl.lALLY eve'l'ything Ame1'icans FACT 1Ise mores by rail at some point of its formation ancl along the d'ist1'ilmtion Railroad rolling' stock owned 01' leased j'oute to consumej·s. The bed a pe'l'son as of Dec. 31, 1963 included 28,600 locomotives, 1,515,139 freight cars and Vol. 52 May-June 1964 No.2 sleep.~ in, the ala'l'm doc/,; that alvak ens llim, tlle b'reak/ast he eats, the 25,800 passenger cars. The freight conreyrmr.e he 1I8e8 to get to ·1COI'I.' car fleet, placed end to end, would all, in oue form 0'1' anotltp,j', depend form a solid train 14,348 miles long, on tl'ansp01·tation fOj' n/'ll' rn(lte1'irlls spanning the continent more than 4 and luuls basic to pTodllction. lVith times. ouf. it the1'e isn't a r.ity in the ~'nited States tlwl; lcouldn't come to a .r;rind FACT in!} pconomic halt. MARIE HOTTON N (I tional Transportation lVeek Hf'l'e are some of the things the rail (In roads do erej'Y 24 hours: Managing Editor "May 10-16 ott'el'ed oppoTtunity to '1'('111 inr7 the p/(blic of how that 'role is * Movr. about 9 tons of freight a dis played in 1964. The fol101cing high tance of one mile for every man, PUBLIC RELATIONS /il/hts (Jj'p, fj'om a "facts" bj'oc)ml'e woman and child in the United DEPARTMENT leh ieh was rlist1'ibutecl dW'ing that States. -
Fox Lake to Chicago – Saturday Fox Lake to Chicago – Sunday* METRA MILWAUKEE Many Buses Board at the Union Station Available on Weekends and Selected Holidays
g y CONNECTING SERVICES TICKET INFORMATION CONTINUED Fox Lake to Chicago – Saturday Fox Lake to Chicago – Sunday* METRA MILWAUKEE Many buses board at the Union Station Available on weekends and selected holidays. 2600 2602 2604 2606 2608 2610 2612 2614 2616 2618 2620 2622 2600 2602 2604 2606 2608 2612 2614 2616 2620 2622 DISTRICT NORTH LINE TCrTaAn sCit oCnennetcetri on sJ:a ckson, including popular routes to Navy C Fahmildirlye nF argees 1 —1 and under ride when accompanied by a ZON E ST ATIONS AM AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM ST A TI ON S AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM )<@ Pier, North Michigan Avenue and Illinois Center. fare paying adult (up to three chiflrdere en free per adult). J FOX LAKE LV : 5:38 6:45 8:4 5 9:45 10:45 11:4 5 12:45 2:45 4:45 — 8:25 10:25 FOX LA KE LV : 5:38 6:45 8:45 9:45 10:4 5 12:45 2:45 4:45 8:2 5 10:25 • DOWNLOAD SCHEDULES Board CTA Blue Line trains at the Clinton/Congress subway • J Ingleside f5:41 f6:48 f8:4 8 — f10:48 — f12:48 f2:48 f4:4 8 — f8:28 f10:28 Ingl esid e f5:4 1 f6:4 8 f8:4 8 — f10:48 f12:48 f2:4 8 f4:4 8 f8:28 f10:28 ;0*2,;: station, two blocks south of Union Station. Board CTA Brown, — Full time students enrolled in an accredited J Lo ng L ak e 5:44 6:51 8:5 1 — f10:51 — f12:51 f2:51 f4:5 1 — 8:31 10:31 Long L ak e 5:44 6:51 8:51 — f10:51 f12:51 f2:5 1 f4:5 1 8:3 1 10:31 NOWNOW Chicago to Orange, Purple, and Pink Line trains at the Quincy/Wells gSrtauddee sncth Foaorl eos r high school can purchase a reduced One-Way, ° I Roun d La ke 5:47 6:54 8:5 4 9:52 10:54 11:5 2 12:54 2:54 4:54 — 8:34 10:34 Ro un d La ke 5:47 6:54 8:54 9:52 10:5 4 12:54 2:54 4:54 8:3 4 10:34 90./; Elevated Station, three blocks east of Union Station. -
Inner Circumferential Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
INNER CIRCUMFERENTIAL COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT and STV Inc. April 1999 Inner Circumferential Commuter Rail Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE FOREWORD ............................................................. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................ ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................... 5 2.1 Alignment Options .................................................. 5 2.2 Description of Alignments ............................................ 8 2.3 Land Use and Zoning ................................................ 12 2.4 Potential Station Locations ............................................ 12 2.5 Environmental Issues ................................................ 19 3.0 FUTURE PLANS .................................................. 24 3.1 Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics .......................... 24 3.2 Municipal Development Plans. ........................................ 27 3.3 Railroads and Other Agencies .......................................... 34 4.0 POTENTIAL OPERATIONS ...................................... 39 4.1 Option 1: IHB-BRC ................................................. 40 4.2 Option 2 :MDW-BRC. .............................................. 41 4.3 Option 3: WCL-CSX-BRC ........................................... 42 4.4 Option 4: IHB-CCP-BRC ............................................ 43 5.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS .................................... -
Union Pacific West Schedule Pdf
Union pacific west schedule pdf Continue Description This project is part of a public-private partnership between Metro and the Union Pacific Railroad to build a new third major line. Segments funded under this project are located between mileposts 10.0 and 11.8 in Maywood and Melrose Park, and between mile posts 32.1 and 38.4 in West Chicago and Geneva. State Service Board: Metro Commuter Rail Program Category: Modernization Budget: $124,939,627 Total status: Construction status Status: Budget plan status: On schedule Current activity: Construction continues for the eastern part. Work has been completed along the east abutment of the Des Plaines River Bridge. Electrical work is almost complete at Maywood station and recently started at Melrose Park station. The platform for the south side of Melrose Park station has begun to be built and should be packed soon. It is estimated that the construction part of the western part of the project will be up for bidding in the third quarter of 2020 once Metro and UP finalize the agreement. Information Updated: August 2020 Federal Funding: $0 State: $44,500,000 RTA: $0 Local: $0 Related Transit Assets Metro Rail Lines: Union Pacific West Line Related Jurisdiction Counties: Cook, DuPage, Kane Municipalities: Bellwood, Geneva, Maywood, Melrose Park, River Forest, West Chicago U.S. Congressional Districts: 14 Lauren Underwood, 4 Chuy Garcia, 6 Sean Casten, 7 Danny Davis Illinois Senate Districts: 25 Jim Oberweis, 33 Donald P. DeWitte, 39 Don Harmon, 4 Kimberly A. Lightford Illinois House Districts:49 -
N:\JOE\RTCP\Interim Progress Report\Links\Report Cover.Tif
Final Report Submitted to Regional Transportation Authority REGIONAL TRANSIT COORDINATION PLAN: LOCATION STUDY prepared by BOOZ·ALLEN & HAMILTON INC. in association with WELSH PLANNING July 2001 This report is confidential and intended solely for the use and information of the company to whom it is addressed Table of Contents Disclaimer Page.........................................................................................................................1 Section 1 – Project Summary...................................................................................................2 Section 2 – Study Purpose .......................................................................................................5 Section 3 – Background............................................................................................................7 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................7 3.2 Assessment of Transit Coordination ...................................................................8 3.2.1 Physical Coordination.............................................................................9 3.2.2 Service Coordination .............................................................................10 3.2.3 Fare Coordination ..................................................................................10 3.2.4 Information Coordination.....................................................................11 3.2.5 Other Themes and Issues......................................................................13 -
CMAQ Project Selection Committee Meeting Note Day Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:00 A.M
CMAQ Project Selection Committee Meeting Note Day Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:00 a.m. Cook/Cunningham-Williams Conference Room 233 South Wacker Dr. Chicago, Illinois Agenda - revised Note: the meeting materials can be found at http://www.catsmpo.com/min-cmaq.htm 1. FY 2007 CMAQ program A. Project rankings and sponsor presentations Project rankings will be presented; they will be posted to the CATS web site, www.catsmpo.com, before the meeting. Project sponsors will be given an opportunity to pre- sent additional information on their projects. If someone wishes to make a presentation, please contact Ross Patronsky, telephone 312-386-8796, e-mail [email protected], be- fore the meeting. Letters in support of specific projects will be noted to the Committee. B. FY 2007 CMAQ programming mark The status of CMAQ apportionments and the proposed mark will be discussed. C. Local Agency Flexible Match Program The local agency flexible match program allows certain public donations of cash, materials and services to satisfy the non-Federal matching requirements. Sponsors could advance a project by paying for preliminary engineering with local funds while still realizing match credit for those funds when the project goes to construction. The draft proposal is attached. Committee discus- sion of whether or not to use this option for the CMAQ program, and criteria for its use, is re- quested. D. FY 2007 CMAQ program development options Options for programming CMAQ funds will be discussed. E. CMAQ program management options Options for managing the obligation of CMAQ funds will be discussed. 2. Project Changes A. -
June, 1952 13
VOLUME 40 No.3 The Hole In Our Pocket MOST OF US, while still small children, learned an important lesson in finance when we firSt decided to see how many pennies we could save. The boys espe cially found our that in order to have enough to jingle, A. G. Dupuis they nOt only had to get them and be careful nOt to Manager spend tOO many, but they also had to make sure there Marc Green Marie Hotton weren't any holes in their trouser pockets. Ed;tor Assistant to Editor The Milwaukee Road has a hole in its pocket. That's PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT to be expected, I suppose, considering the traffic in and UNION STATION-CHICACO out of it, but to my mind the hole is much bigger than The Milwaukee Road Magazine is pub it should be. lished for active and retired employes of The Milwaukee Road. to whom it is dis tributed free. It is available to others Last year almost $5,400,000 slipped through it and at 10c per single copy or $1.00 per year. was lost forever. Loss and damage to our customers' goods COSt us $2,460,000 in freight claims, while an IN THIS ISSUE other $426,000 went to repair cars damaged by rough handling. Train accidents, including damage to prop Page erty and equipment and the cost of clearing wrecks, The Hole In Our Pocket By President J. P. Kiley-------- 2 cost another $2,498,000. These figures are apart from Twin City Safety Show---------- 3 the factOr of custOmer dissatisfaction and the risk of C. -
May-June 1962
· Safety Bulletin • • • • MILWAUKEE REPEATS! Bulletin Board REDUCED RAIL RATES fot' visit.ors road tank car whiGh (~ost thc g-ovenllllent tl'OlIl !llll'o~d hl'l'lUll(' dT('(·.Li'e :'Ila.\' 1011 'Vi,nOO ill 1[)4~. It ~old for $:-),200. a II pa~"ellg'('r (,alT.yjJJg- l'nilroads in the Ot1'leia h, :-:i1id that at toda~"s pI'iecs !.he l'lIi tcd Stnt(~~ 1111'1 Canada. The cub lJU.I'e" got :\ b:\rgain, a llloUllt to a ];) pel' ccnt, red1J(·(ioll in Vol. 50 May-June 1962 No.2 eo~('h f<1J'e~ from <Ill port;; to 'lIl." in f<:l'ior j.!Oiut, j'(·/..lIruillg to any port, HORATIO ALGER AWARD (\oIli't'l'1'ed SpPl'p[Hry of Comuu'J'('e liodgeH ha~ elwh year h.y th(; Amel'icon S~hools and c:nJllllH'1H1('d til(' l'ailroads tOl' oJTl'I'illg' ('olk~(':,; _-\s:,;()('iatioll on 10 Jll"OJJ\i)l(·nt. ">\11 ('.';I'iting n P 11' iJl(lncemrn[ for Alll('li('!lll~ "'!lo h,ivc :l"hiev('c! SlH'~PSS ]WOjlll'K I'rom CV('l"y\rhere to S(;e the through illil i\'illnol illit.illli n' "'as pre hefll't-l>llHl (It AlHel'lc~ 011 Ollt< of Allleri seull'd On AI ay 9 t.o .J. I'a!.ril'k Lannan, ('a'~ fl1Yorii(' mlldp:; of t.nlll:<portation". ('!w imwn of till' e.xeeutivc ~omlJlittee of MARJE HaTTON tIl(' :'II i1,,'m] ke(" Roa tl hoard of (1 iredoJ"s.