DOCSLIB.ORG

Underground Waters of Missouri

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Underground Waters of Missouri Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 195 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR UNDERGROUND WATERS OF MISSOURI THEIR GEOLOGY AND UTILIZATION BY EDWARD M. SHEPARD WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1907 CONTENTS. Page Introduction............................................................. L Historical facts........................................................... 2 Requisite conditions for flowing artesian wells.............................. 3 Variation in the flow of artesian wells..................................... 5 Topography ............................................................. 7 Northwest plateau district ............................................ 7 North-central prairie district.......................................... 8 Ozark-St. Francis dome district. ..i.................................... 8 Ozark border district ................................................. 9 Southeastern lowlands district...........................'.............. 9 Lincoln Ridge district................................................ 10 Geology ................................................................. 11 Rock formations. ................^.... ................................ 11 General statement............. .................................. 11 Archean...................................... ..............^... 12 Knob Lick granite.................................... 13 Iron Mountain porphyry.............................. 13 Other igneous rocks .................................. 13 Cambrian........................................................ 13 La Motte sandstone...--..-..-..-..-..--...-...-...... 13 Boniieterre limestone................................. 14 Cambro-Ordovician.............................................. 14 Elvins formation..................................... 14 Gasconade limestone ................................. 14 Roubidoux sandstone................................. 15 Jefferson City limestone .............................. 15 St. Peter sandstone................................... 16 Joachim limestone ................................... 17 Ordovician........................................ .............. 17 Silurian ......................................................... 17 Devonian ....._.....*.................. .._...................... 18 Carboniferous.................................................... 18 Mississippian ................................................ 18 Louisiana limestone .........................--.-----. 18 Hannibal formation .................................. 19 Chouteau formation .................................. 20 Burlington limestone ................................. 20 Keokuk limestone.................................... 21 Warsaw formation.................................... 21 Spergen limestone.................................... 21 St. Louis limestone.-..-..........-...-.--...-...----. 22. Chester group........................................ 22 IH IV CONTENTS. Geology Continued. Page. Rock formations Continued. Carboniferous Continued. Pennsylvanian .............................. r .^.. ........... 22 Des Moines group ........................................ 22 Graydon formation.................................... 22 Cherokee shale....................................... 23 Henrietta, limestone -.-......-...............-...-..-- 23 Pleasanton shale -..............--.-....-....-...-.--- 23 Missouri group........................................... 24 Cretaceous....................................................... 24 Tertiary......................................................... 24 Porters Creek formation .............................. 24 Lagrange formation .................................. 25 Lafayette gravel...--.-..-..-...--......--..-.--.---.. 25 Quaternary ................. .................................... 25 Columbia clay ....................................... 25 Alluvium, etc........................................ 25 Geologic history......__............--..._......-...._............_... 26 Archean......................................................... 26 Cambrian and Carnbro-Ordovician ................................ 26 Ordovician....................................................... 27 Silurian and Devonian............................................ 27 Carboniferous.................................................... 27 Mesozoic ........................................................ 28 Tertiary ......................................................... 29 Quaternary ...................................................... 29 Descriptions of geologic sections....................................... 29 Section from Glenwood, Iowa, to Brunswick, Mo....... ........... 29 Section from Kansas City to Lebanon.............................. 31 Section from St. Joseph to Versailles .............................. 32 Section from Forest City to St. Louis .............. ............... 33 Section from Arcadia, Kans., to Memphis, Term...... ............. 34 Section from Doniphan, Mo., to Hickman, Ky ..................... 35 Section from Doniphan, Mo., to Cairo, 111.......................... 35 Section from Pleasant Hill to- Louisiana............................ 36 Section from Higginsville to Hannibal............................. 37 Section from Moberly southwest to Nevada, thence south to Carthage and east to Springfield.......................................... 38 Section from Pacific, Mo., to Greenville, 111 ........................ 41 Section from Keokuk, Iowa, to St. Louis, Mo....................... 41 Underground waters..... ................................................ 43 Artesian districts..................................................... 43 Northeastern district ....................1............................ 43 General artesian conditions ........................................ 43 Clark County .................................................... 44 Kahoka ..................................................... 44 Lewis County.................................................... 45 Canton ...................................................... 45 Lagrange .................................................... 46 Lincoln County .................................................. 48 Troy ........................................................ 48 Marion County .................................................... 48 Hannibal.................................................... 48 CONTENTS. V Underground waters Continued. Page. Northeastern district Coutiuued. Marion County Continued. Nelson ville .................................................. 50 Palmyra............. ....................................... 51 Oakwood.................................................... 51 Pike County..................................................... 52 Louisiana.................................................... 52 Balls County..................................................... 53 Renssdlaer.................................................... 53 Spalding..................................................... 54 North-central district................................................. 55 General artesian conditions ....................................... 55 Adair County.................................................... 55 Kirksviite ..................................'................. 55 Caldwell County ................................................. 56 Braymer .................................................... 56 Carroll County................................................... 57 Carrollton ................................................... 57 Tina ........................................................ 58 Clay County ..................................................... 58 Excelsior Springs............................................ 58 Kearney..--......-...........-...-.-.-.- .--.--..-..--...-.. 60 Daviess County .................................................. 60 Gallatin ..................................................... 60 Harrison County................................................. 61 Bethany..................................................... 61 Holt County..................................................... 62 Forest City .................................................. 62 Linn County..... ............................................... 66 Brookfield................... ............................... 66 St. Catherine................. .............................. 66 Livingston County................................................ 67 Chillicothe................................................... 67 Utica ;....................................................... 67 Mercer County................................................... 68 Wasson Creek....................................... ........ 68 Princeton ............ ^..............................,......... 70 Nodaway County -. ................................................ 70 Burlington Junction....................... .................. 70 Maryville.................................................... 70 South-central district............. ................................... 71 General artesian conditions.................-----.----..-.-.-.-.... 71 Audrain County.................................................. 72 Mexico...................................................... 72 Vandalia .................................................... 73 Boone County.................................................... 73 Columbia...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dhamori Village Development Plan
    This presentation premiered at WaterSmart Innovations watersmartinnovations.com Translating Historical Water Wisdom to Contemporary Challenges Leslie A. Johnson, 2018 MLA Capstone Chair: Professor John Koepke Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Minnesota Project Advisor: Alpa Nawre, University of Florida Agenda 1. Contemporary Issues in India & the Relationship to Traditional Water Management 2. Site Visit to Dhamori, India & Project Background 3. Water Wisdom: Capstone Research & Design 4. Lessons Learned & Broader Applications Image Credit: Dhamori Village - Leslie A. Johnson Part I. Contemporary Issues in India & the Relationship to Traditional Water Management India today faces a wide variety of social, environmental, and cultural issues related to water issues. • Conflicts between domestic and productive water use • Farmer suicides in rural communities Image Credit: Maharashtra Farmer during Drought - Jagadeesh NV, European Press Photo Agency / Relocated Workers - “Drought in Maharashtra,” Mumbai Mirror / Farmer Suicides - India You, 2011 Part I. Contemporary Issues in India & the Relationship to Traditional Water Management • Threats to food security • Seasonal migration to cities • During the monsoon, there can be too much water, but during the dry season, there can be too little Challenges stem from water mismanagement as much, or more so, as from water scarcity. Yet India has a rich history of water conservation strategies, so how is it that these current issues came to be? Image Credit: In wait for water - Mumbai Mirror / Stepwell – Atlas Obscura Part I. Contemporary Issues in India & the Relationship to Traditional Water Management What is ”traditional water management?” Broadly, water systems present prior to industrialization, specifically those systems derived from the vernacular of their landscapes and needs of a particular group of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Document (Pdf 1196
    Final Report GeoEngineers On-Call Agreement Y-7717 Task Order AU AN APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING INFILTRATION RATES FOR STORMWATER INFILTRATION DRY WELLS by Joel Massmann, Ph.D., P.E. Washington State Department of Transportation Technical Monitor Glorilyn Maw Washington State Transportation Commission Department of Transportation and in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration April 2004 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. WA-RD 589.1 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE AN APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING INFILTRATION April 2004 RATES FOR STORMWATER INFILTRATION DRY WELLS 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Joel Massmann, Ph.D., P.E. 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Agreement Y7717, Task AU 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED Research Office Final Research Report Washington State Department of Transportation Transportation Building, MS 47372 Olympia, Washington 98504-7372 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Keith Anderson, Project Manager, 360-709-5405 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This study was conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. ABSTRACT This report describes an approach for estimating infiltration rates for dry wells that are constructed using standard configurations developed by the Washington State Department of Transportation. The approach was developed recognizing that the performance of these dry wells depends upon a combination of subsurface geology, groundwater conditions, and dry well geometry. The report focuses on dry wells located in unconsolidated geologic materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Niangua River Trail Starts at Ha Ha Tonka Big Niangua State Park
    The Big Niangua River Trail starts at Ha Ha Tonka Big Niangua State Park. The first four miles are lake and require paddling. The kayak steps and launch rail provide a safe and For a river float try an upriver access. convenient way to access the Big Niangua River Trail and the Lake while protecting the shoreline from erosion. At Ÿ Distances River Trail the upper end of the cove Missouri’s 12th largest spring § Whistle Bridge to Ha Ha Tonka 13.3 miles flows into the lake. Ha Ha Tonka Spring has an average § Mother Nature’s Family Side to Ha Ha Tonka 11.7 output of 48 million gallons of water a day. On the south The Indigenous Osage People named this miles side of the cove, all that remains of a grist mill is the stone raceway and an old mill stone. Take State Highway D to river the Niangua § Mother Nature’s Wild Side to Ha Ha Tonka 9.5 Tonka Spring Road; turn left from the spring parking lot at which translates to miles the Lakeside Picnic Shelter to reach the kayak steps. Big Winding Stream of Many Springs. § Casa de Loco to Ha Ha Tonka 6.2 miles Ÿ The Lake of the Ozarks and Niangua River are public waterways available for fishing and boating. However, the Spencer Creek and Bank Branch join with the Niangua River shoreline and stream bank above the high waterline is in this area. These two spring-fed creeks can be navigated privately owned. Trespass laws do apply. Be considerate a short distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Family Residential Stormwater Management Plan Dry Well (Infiltration) Construction Inspections
    Single Family Residential Stormwater Management Plan DRY WELL (INFILTRATION) Definition : A dry well is an excavated pit filled with gravel and sand that provides temporary storage of runoff from roofs and allows for infiltration of that runoff over a 48 hour period. Constraints : • Dry wells should not be used in areas where their operation may create a risk for basement flooding, interfere with septic sewage disposal systems, or cause downslope seepage problems • May not be installed on slopes greater than 20% • Drainage area to each dry well shall not exceed 1000 square feet • Dry wells may not be used in HSG D or if the infiltration rate of the soil is less than 0.27 inches per hour • Dry wells are intended to capture rooftop runoff only Design Guidance: • Dry wells must be installed in accordance with the attached detail • Dry wells should not intercept water table, bedrock, fragipan or other confining layer • Dry wells must be located down gradient of building structures and set back at least 10 feet from buildings, 50 feet from water supply wells and 25 feet from septic systems • Dry wells must be set back at least 50 feet from fill slopes of 25% or steeper • Soils will be evaluated during excavation by ASCD representative to evaluate soil suitability assumed in original design which may alter type of practice to be constructed Installation: • Minimize compaction of dry well bottom and sidewalls • Collection pipes from downspouts shall be 4”-6” PVC installed at min. slope of 1% • The bottom of the dry well excavation should be
    [Show full text]
  • The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods
    The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods ... Have We Forgotten? Introduction - This report was originally written as NWS Technical Attachment 81-11 in 1981, the thirtieth anniversary of this devastating flood. The co-authors of the original report were Robert Cox, Ernest Kary, Lee Larson, Billy Olsen, and Craig Warren, all hydrologists at the Missouri Basin River Forecast Center at that time. Although most of the original report remains accurate today, Robert Cox has updated portions of the report in light of occurrences over the past twenty years. Comparisons of the 1951 flood to the events of 1993 as well as many other parenthetic remarks are examples of these revisions. The Storms of 1951 - Fifty years ago, the stage was being set for one of the greatest natural disasters ever to hit the Midwest. May, June and July of 1951 saw record rainfalls over most of Kansas and Missouri, resulting in record flooding on the Kansas, Osage, Neosho, Verdigris and Missouri Rivers. Twenty-eight lives were lost and damage totaled nearly 1 billion dollars. (Please note that monetary damages mentioned in this report are in 1951 dollars, unless otherwise stated. 1951 dollars can be equated to 2001 dollars using a factor of 6.83. The total damage would be $6.4 billion today.) More than 150 communities were devastated by the floods including two state capitals, Topeka and Jefferson City, as well as both Kansas Cities. Most of Kansas and Missouri as well as large portions of Nebraska and Oklahoma had monthly precipitation totaling 200 percent of normal in May, 300 percent in June, and 400 percent in July of 1951.
    [Show full text]
  • East Osage River Watershed Inventory and Assessment
    EAST OSAGE RIVER WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Prepared by Alex L. S. Schubert Missouri Department of Conservation West Central Region-Fisheries Division Clinton, MO November 30, 2001 Acknowledgments Thank you's are in order to numerous individuals who provided assistance on this document. Thanks to Mike Bayless and Tom Groshens for information gathering and the compilation of numerous tables, and to Ron Dent for his guidance on, and editing of early drafts of this document. Mike was also a tremendous help in getting me started and making final changes to this document. Thanks to Bill Turner for the guidance he provided throughout this process. Thanks to Mark Caldwell for assistance with ArcView GIS software, his assistance in the field, and his dedication to providing the best data and information possible in GIS format. Thanks to Del Lobb for extensive help throughout the draft process. Thanks also to Missouri Department of Conservation, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and U.S. Geological Survey personnel and to other contributors too numerous to mention. Executive Summary The East Osage River Basin is found in central Missouri in the Missouri counties of Osage, Maries, Cole, Pulaski, Miller, Camden, Morgan, Benton, and Hickory and encompasses 2,474.52 mi2. This basin has been divided into two 8-digit hydrologic units (HUCs) and fourteen 11-digit HUCs. Lake of the Ozarks was formed in 1931 in the western half of the East Osage River Basin. Geomorphology This basin lies within a dissected plateau known as the Salem Plateau and is represented by four of Missouri’s natural divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Infiltration Trench & Soakaway
    An Infiltration Trench System includes an inlet pipe or water source, catch basin sump, perforated DESIGN PRINCIPLES distribution pipe, infiltration trench and overflow to the storm drainage system. ■ Infiltration Trench System: A Soakaway Manhole (Sump, or Dry Well) System includes an inlet pipe, a sedimentation manhole, and one or more infiltration shafts with connecting pipes. Use of Infiltration Shaft will be limited by hydro- a) Locate infiltration trench at least 3m geotechnical conditions in much of GVRD. from any building, 1.5m from Limitations of Infiltration Trench or Soakaway Manholes: property lines, and 6m from adjacent a) To avoid groundwater pollution, do not direct un-treated polluted runoff to Infiltration Trench or Shaft: infiltration facilities (or as recommended by a geotechnical ▪ Direct clean runoff (roof, non-automobile paving) to Infiltration Trench or Shaft. engineer). ▪ For polluted runoff (roads > 1000 vehicles / day, parking areas, other pollution sources), provide upstream source control for pollutant reduction prior to release to Infiltration Trench or Shaft. b) Sump: Provide a lid for periodic b) Use infiltration trench or shaft only in areas with footing drains. inspection and cleanout. Include a 1. Grass or Other Planting T-inlet pipe to trap oils, sediments 2. Finish Grade and debris. 3. Growing Medium Backfill 4. 100mm Dia PVC DR28 Perforated 19 c) Infiltration Trench: installation of Pipe distribution pipe and bottom of 5. Light Non-woven Polyester drainrock to be level. If more than Geotextile c/w Min. 400mm Laps one section of infiltration trench is 9 1 required, design so that underground 6. 50mm Drain Rock or Rock of water is temporarily ‘ponded’ in each Equal Porosity infiltration section.
    [Show full text]
  • Caves of Missouri
    CAVES OF MISSOURI J HARLEN BRETZ Vol. XXXIX, Second Series E P LU M R I U BU N S U 1956 STATE OF MISSOURI Department of Business and Administration Division of GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND WATER RESOURCES T. R. B, State Geologist Rolla, Missouri vii CONTENT Page Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 5 Origin of Missouri's caves 6 Cave patterns 13 Solutional features 14 Phreatic solutional features 15 Vadose solutional features 17 Topographic relations of caves 23 Cave "formations" 28 Deposits made in air 30 Deposits made at air-water contact 34 Deposits made under water 36 Rate of growth of cave formations 37 Missouri caves with provision for visitors 39 Alley Spring and Cave 40 Big Spring and Cave 41 Bluff Dwellers' Cave 44 Bridal Cave 49 Cameron Cave 55 Cathedral Cave 62 Cave Spring Onyx Caverns 72 Cherokee Cave 74 Crystal Cave 81 Crystal Caverns 89 Doling City Park Cave 94 Fairy Cave 96 Fantastic Caverns 104 Fisher Cave 111 Hahatonka, caves in the vicinity of 123 River Cave 124 Counterfeiters' Cave 128 Robbers' Cave 128 Island Cave 130 Honey Branch Cave 133 Inca Cave 135 Jacob's Cave 139 Keener Cave 147 Mark Twain Cave 151 Marvel Cave 157 Meramec Caverns 166 Mount Shira Cave 185 Mushroom Cave 189 Old Spanish Cave 191 Onondaga Cave 197 Ozark Caverns 212 Ozark Wonder Cave 217 Pike's Peak Cave 222 Roaring River Spring and Cave 229 Round Spring Cavern 232 Sequiota Spring and Cave 248 viii Table of Contents Smittle Cave 250 Stark Caverns 256 Truitt's Cave 261 Wonder Cave 270 Undeveloped and wild caves of Missouri 275 Barry County 275 Ash Cave
    [Show full text]
  • Type Kinderhook Ammonoids
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 80 Number Article 6 1973 Type Kinderhook Ammonoids W. M. Furnish University of Iowa Walter L. Manger University of Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1973 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Furnish, W. M. and Manger, Walter L. (1973) "Type Kinderhook Ammonoids," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 80(1), 15-24. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol80/iss1/6 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Furnish and Manger: Type Kinderhook Ammonoids 15 Type Kinderhook Ammonoids W. M. FURNISH1 and WALTER L. MANGER FURNISH, W. M. and WALTER L. MANGER. Type Kinderhook Am­ and the associated conodont faunal data. The Kinderhookian monoids. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci., 80( 1): 15-24, 1973. Wassonville Member of the Hampton Formation in southeastern SYNOPSIS: Lower Mississippian rocks in the type area of North Iowa and the Chouteau Limestone of Missouri fall within the America have produced only a few scattered ammonoid cephalo­ lower "Pericyclus-Stufe" of the upper Tournaisian Stage as these pods. Those specimens from southeastern Iowa and northwestern units are designated for the early Lower Carboniferous of Western Missouri lie within the general vicinity of the designated type Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Osage River Downstream of Bagnell Dam
    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations Fall 2010 Stability of streambanks subjected to highly variable streamflows: the Osage River Downstream of Bagnell Dam Kathryn Nicole Heinley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Department: Recommended Citation Heinley, Kathryn Nicole, "Stability of streambanks subjected to highly variable streamflows: the Osage River Downstream of Bagnell Dam" (2010). Masters Theses. 5022. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/5022 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STABILITY OF STREAMBANKS SUBJECTED TO HIGHLY VARIABLE STREAMFLOWS: THE OSAGE RIVER DOWNSTREAM OF BAGNELL DAM by KATHRYN NICOLE HEINLEY A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 2010 Approved by Cesar Mendoza, Ph.D., Advisor A. Curtis Elmore, Ph.D., P.E. Charles D. Morris, Ph.D., P.E. © 2010 Kathryn Nicole Heinley All Rights Reserved 111 ABSTRACT Streambank erosion of the Osage River downstream of Bagnell Dam is naturally­ occurring; however, it may be significantly worsened due to releases made from the dam to generate hydropower. In this study, six typical outflow release patterns from Bagnell Dam were evaluated to determine their effects, if any, on the stability and the rate and amount of erosion of the banks of the Osage River.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Without the Tables
    Hydrologic, Soil, and Vegetation Gradients in Remnant and Constructed Riparian Wetlands in West-Central Missouri, 2001–04 By David C. Heimann1and Paige A. Mettler-Cherry2 1U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Discipline, Lee’s Summit, Missouri 2Lindenwood University, Department of Biological Sciences, St. Charles, Missouri Prepared in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Conservation Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5216 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Heimann, D.C., and Mettler-Cherry, P.A., 2004, Hydrologic, Soil, and Vegetation Gradients in Remnant and Constructed Riparian Wetlands in West-Central Missouri, 2001–04: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004- 5216, 160 p. iii CONTENTS Abstract. 1 Introduction . 2 Purpose and Scope . 3 Description of Study Area . 3 Land-Use History of Four Rivers Conservation Area . 3 Acknowledgments. 7 Methods . 7 Hydrology. 7 Surface-Water Monitoring . 7 Ground-Water Monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Interstate Highway 244 and 44 Exchange, Kirkwood, Missouri
    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations 1965 The geology of the interstate highway 244 and 44 exchange, Kirkwood, Missouri John Neil Thomas Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Department: Recommended Citation Thomas, John Neil, "The geology of the interstate highway 244 and 44 exchange, Kirkwood, Missouri" (1965). Masters Theses. 5338. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/5338 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GEOLOGY OF THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 244 AND 44 INTERCHANGE, KIRKWOOD MISSOURI BY JOHN NEIL THOMAS A THESIS submitted to the faculty of the UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT ROLLA in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE, GEOLOGY MAJOR Rolla, Missouri 1965 Approved by ~~ (advisor) ~.Ad~ ii ABSTRACT During the summer of 1964, construction was completed on the intersection of Interstate Highways 244, 44 and u.s. Highway 66, one mile southwest of Kirkwood, Missouri. Dur­ ing the construction of the interchange, numerous artificial exposures of rocks of the middle Mississippian Meramecian Series were exposed. This provided an excellent opportunity for examining fresh exposures near the type Meramecian Ser­ ies. The formations of the area were studied, and starti­ graphic sections were prepared from three of the more com­ plete sections that were measured and described. The high­ way cuts expose complete sections of the Warsaw and Salem formations, and the lower part of the St.
    [Show full text]