DOCSLIB.ORG

Philadelphia Stormwater Manual V2.1 Philadelphia Stormwater Manual V2.1 This Pageintentionallyleftblank Simplified Approach Design Criteria Rooftop Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

7 Stormwater Management Practice Design Guidelines 7.1 Green Roofs 7.2 Rain Barrels and Cisterns 7.3 Filter Strips 7.4 Filters 7.5 Bioinfiltration / Bioretention 7.6 Detention Basins 7.7 Berms and Retentive Grading 7.8 Swales 7.9 Constructed Wetlands (see PA Stormwater BMP Manual) 7.10 Ponds & Wet Basins (see PA Stormwater BMP Manual) 7.11 Subsurface Vaults 7.12 Subsurface Infiltration 7.13 Porous Pavement 7.14 Pre-fabricated and Proprietary Designs (see PA Stormwater BMP Manual) 7.15 Inlet and Outlet Controls Philadelphia Stormwater Manual v2.1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Philadelphia Stormwater Manual v2.1 Simplified Approach Design Criteria Rooftop Systems This section provides the following information about eco-roofs and roof gardens: S Typical cross section S Description S General specifications S Checklist of minimal information to be shown on the permit drawings S Construction inspection requirements and schedule S Link to landscaping requirements S Link to example landscaping plans S Link to operation and maintenance requirements S Link to photos 7.1 S Link to drawings 7.1 S Eco-roof Central City F.A.R. bonus guidelines Green roofs (vegetated roof/eco roof/roof garden) consist of a layer of vegetation that completely covers an otherwise conventional flat or pitched roof. The hydrologic response of a green roof bears closer resemblance to a lawn or meadow than impervious surface. The green roof system is composed of multiple layers including waterproofing, a drainage City of Portland, OR layer, engineered planting media, and specially selected plants. Vegetated roof covers can be optimized to achieve water quantity and quality benefits. Through the appropriate selection of materials, vegetated covers can provide rainfall retention green roofs green roofs and detention functions. Stormwater Management Manual Page 2-16 key elementsAdopted July: 1, 1999; revised September 1, 2002 • Extensive green roofs with engineered media at least 3 inches in depth can be considered pervious in stormwater design calculations. • Vegetated roof covers intended to achieve water quality benefits should maintain a soluble nitrogen level of 4ppm. • Internal drainage, including provisions to cover and protect deck drains or scuppers, must anticipate the need to manage large rainfall events without inundating the cover. • Provide urban green space and aesthetically pleasing views. • Act as heat sink to reduce heating and cooling costs. • Can extend roof life by two to three times. • Improve air quality by filtering dust particles. potential applications stormwater regulations Residential Subdivision:Case by case Water Quality: Commercial: Yes Infiltration: No Volume Reduction: Ultra Urban: Yes Yes (no infiltration) Industrial: Yes Channel Protection: Retrofit: Yes Not included in DCIA Flood Control: Highway Road: No Low acceptable forms of pre-treatment N/A Philadelphia Stormwater Manual v2.1 7 - 1 7.1 Green Roofs in the Urban Landscape Unlike conventional roofing, green roofs promote retention, slow release, and evapotranspiration of precipitation. This stormwater management technique is very effective in reducing the volume and velocity of stormwater runoff from roofs. Green roofs can be installed on many types of roofs, from small slanting roofs to large commercial flat roofs. Green roofs are an ideal option for new buildings that are taking long term cost savings and energy conservation into consideration. Many existing buildings can also be retrofitted with green roofs. Although green roofs are more expensive than conventional roofs up front, they provide long term benefits and cost savings. The vegetated cover assembly should be compatible with and designed to protect the underlying waterproofing materials. By protecting the waterproofing from mechanical damage, shielding it from UV radiation, and buffering temperature extremes, the service life of the roof can be extended by two to three times. Green roofs also may reduce energy costs by acting green roofs as a heat sink. The roof slowly absorbs energy from the sun during the day and releases it as the air cools, thereby reducing heating and cooling costs. The benefits will be greatest during the summer months, especially for low buildings. Green roofs also reduce the urban heat island effect by providing evaporative cooling and can © 2004, Roofscapes, Inc. Used by permission; all rights reserved. improve air quality by filtering dust particles. Example of a green roof at the Heinz 57 Center Pittsburgh, PA Components of a Green Roof There are two basic types of green roofs. An extensive green roof system is a thin (usually less than 6 inches), lighter weight system planted predominantly with drought-tolerant succulent plants and grasses. An intensive green roof is a deeper, heavier system designed to sustain more complex landscapes. A green roof system, extensive or intensive, is often comprised of the same components: • Plant material • Growing medium • Filter fabric • Drainage layer • Waterproof membrane/root barrier • Roof structure Plant Material The plant material chosen for green roofs is designed to take up much of the water that falls on the roof during a storm event. Plant selection is very important to the sustainability of the roof. About 50% of the vegetation on an extensive green roof should be Sedums. Plant material also collects dust, creates oxygen, releases moisture, and provides evaporative cooling. Philadelphia Stormwater Manual v2.1 7 - 2 7.1 Growing Medium The growing medium is a critical element of stormwater storage and detention on a green roof, and provides a buffer between the roof structure and vegetation for root development. Storage is provided by a green roof primarily through water held in tension in the growing medium pores. The growing medium in an extensive green roof should be a lightweight mineral material with a minimum of organic material and should stand up to freeze/thaw cycles. Filter Fabric An engineered filter fabric prevents fine soil particles from passing into the drainage layer of the green roof system. Drainage Layer The drainage layer may be either a lightweight granular medium or a synthetic layer that underlays and promotes free drainage of the planting medium. In some City of Portland, OR assemblages, synthetic drainage layers green roofs green roofs may also incorporate depressions that can intercept and retain small quantities of runoff. Figure 7.1: Cross-section view of roof garden Waterproof Membrane/Root Barrier To maintain structural integrity of the roof, a waterproof material is laid above the roof structure. Some waterproofing materials are inherently root resistant, whereas others require an additional root barrier. Roof Structure The load capacity of a roof structure must be taken into account when considering the installation of a green roof. Extensive green roofs typically weigh between 15 and 30 lbs per square foot and are compatible with wood or steel decks. Intensive green roofs weigh more than 36 lbs per square foot and typically require concrete supporting decks. Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Manual Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Manual Ponding of water on standard rooftop Rooftop after greenroof installation Philadelphia Stormwater Manual v2.1 7 - 3 7.1 Recommended Design Procedure • Investigate the feasibility of the installation of a green roof. A Structural Engineer should verify that the roof will support the weight of the green roof system. It is important to consider the wet weight of the roof in the design calculations. • Determine the portion of roof that will have a green roof. • Extensive green roofs that have an engineered media at least 3 inches thick are permitted a DCIA reduction equal to the entire area of the green roof. • Impervious roof area directing runoff onto the green roof cannot exceed 50% of the green roof area. • The minimum thickness of the green roof growing medium is 3 inches. When only a portion of a roof is a green roof, it is acceptable to drain runoff from the impervious portion of the roof to the green roof. The minimum thickness of the green roof qualifying as pervious area is determined using the following formula, where impervious roof area/green roof area ≤ 0.50 : Minimum thickness (in inches) of green roof growing medium = 3” + [3 * (Impervious roof area/ Green roof area)] • The contributing area of rooftop to each disconnected discharge point must be equal to or less than 500 square feet. • Runoff from impervious roof area onto green roof must be dispersed evenly across it and pass through the growing medium. Drainage piping may be necessary to ensure distribution. green roofs • The green roof is considered pervious area when determining whether a redevelopment project has reduced DCIA by 20%. • The area of the green roof is not included in the calculation of the Water Quality Volume, because it is not considered DCIA. • The area of the green roof is not included in the calculation of the Channel Protection Volume, because it is not considered DCIA. • The green roof area can be considered pervious open space in good condition with moderate soils when determining post-development flow rates for the Flood Control requirement. • Although green roofs are not considered as impervious surfaces when determining applicability of stormwater management requirements, they are not zero discharge systems. The roof drainage system and the remainder of the site drainage system must safely convey roof runoff to the storm sewer, combined sewer, or receiving water. • Green roofs with a media thickness less than 3 inches can only be considered pervious if the designer can demonstrate that the initial abstraction of the green roof will be 0.5 inches or greater. • Develop Planting Plan based on the thickness of the planting media. • Complete construction plans and specifications. Materials Presently, the most complete established standards for green roof construction are those developed in Germany by the Forschungsgesellschaft Landschaftsentwicklung Landschaftsbau (FLL). The FLL standards and guidelines include industry standard tests for the weight, moisture, nutrient content, and grain-size distribution of growing media.
Recommended publications
  • Dhamori Village Development Plan

    Dhamori Village Development Plan

    This presentation premiered at WaterSmart Innovations watersmartinnovations.com Translating Historical Water Wisdom to Contemporary Challenges Leslie A. Johnson, 2018 MLA Capstone Chair: Professor John Koepke Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Minnesota Project Advisor: Alpa Nawre, University of Florida Agenda 1. Contemporary Issues in India & the Relationship to Traditional Water Management 2. Site Visit to Dhamori, India & Project Background 3. Water Wisdom: Capstone Research & Design 4. Lessons Learned & Broader Applications Image Credit: Dhamori Village - Leslie A. Johnson Part I. Contemporary Issues in India & the Relationship to Traditional Water Management India today faces a wide variety of social, environmental, and cultural issues related to water issues. • Conflicts between domestic and productive water use • Farmer suicides in rural communities Image Credit: Maharashtra Farmer during Drought - Jagadeesh NV, European Press Photo Agency / Relocated Workers - “Drought in Maharashtra,” Mumbai Mirror / Farmer Suicides - India You, 2011 Part I. Contemporary Issues in India & the Relationship to Traditional Water Management • Threats to food security • Seasonal migration to cities • During the monsoon, there can be too much water, but during the dry season, there can be too little Challenges stem from water mismanagement as much, or more so, as from water scarcity. Yet India has a rich history of water conservation strategies, so how is it that these current issues came to be? Image Credit: In wait for water - Mumbai Mirror / Stepwell – Atlas Obscura Part I. Contemporary Issues in India & the Relationship to Traditional Water Management What is ”traditional water management?” Broadly, water systems present prior to industrialization, specifically those systems derived from the vernacular of their landscapes and needs of a particular group of people.
  • Map Plan and Report for Proposed Sewer District

    Map Plan and Report for Proposed Sewer District

    MAP, PLAN AND REPORT SEWER DISTRICT FORMATION SCHOHARIE BUSINESS PARK TOWN OF SCHOHARIE, NEW YORK MARCH 11, 2020 197 ELM STREET PO BOX 610 COBLESKILL, NEW YORK 12043 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 Wastewater System History 1 3 Existing Conditions 1 4 Evaluation of Facilities 5 5 Proposed Sewer District Options 7 6 Conclusion and Recommendations 8 APPENDICES A Schoharie Business Park Mapping B NYSDEC Correspondence C Existing Sewer System Schematic D Water Production Data E Existing SPDES Permit F Mapping of Sewer District Options G Proposed Improvements H User Cost Calculations I Proposed Sewer District Map and Description Page 1 1 INTRODUCTION The Schoharie Business Park (SBP) consists of 13 tax parcels as indicated on the mapping in Appendix A. The Business Park is currently served by private water and sewer systems and a private road network. Recently, NYSDEC has urged the Town to consider forming a Sewer District so that certain administrative and ownership issues related to the sewer system can be addressed. While the water system and the road network also have some technical issues that need attention, the scope of this Map, Plan and Report (MPR) only includes the Sewer System. 2 WASTEWATER SYSTEM HISTORY The wastewater system for the Schoharie Business Park was issued a discharge permit from NYSDEC in March of 2001. In 2002, Schoharie Park Sewage Works, Inc. was formed to operate the wastewater system under the NYS Transportation Corporation Law. In 2017, when many properties within the Schoharie Business Park were sold, Schoharie Park Sewage Works, Inc. was dissolved. This has left two options for the proper administration of the sewer system: 1) the current owner of the Schoharie Business Park (7 Summits, LLC) can form a new Transportation Corporation or 2) the Town of Schoharie can form a Sewer District.
  • Bioretention a Guide for Stormwater Retention & Water Quality Improvement Bioretention: a Guide for Stormwater Retention & Water Quality Improvement

    Bioretention a Guide for Stormwater Retention & Water Quality Improvement Bioretention: a Guide for Stormwater Retention & Water Quality Improvement

    Bioretention A Guide for Stormwater Retention & Water Quality Improvement Bioretention: A Guide for Stormwater Retention & Water Quality Improvement Table of Contents BIORETENTION OVERVIEW 1 01. INTRODUCTION 3 02. CRITICAL PROCESSES OF BIORETENTION 3 03. BIORETENTION TYPES 4 A. Facility Performance Types 4 B. Commercial Bioretention Area Types 7 C. Residential Bioretention Area Types 8 D. Design Themes 13 04. DESIGN PHASES 13 A. Concept Phase 13 B. Engineering Design Phase 15 C. Engineering Plan Review Phase 20 D. Pre-Construction Phase 21 E. Construction Phase 21 F. Final Closeout Phase 21 G. Maintenance and Operation Phase 22 05. REFERENCES 22 Bioretention: A Guide for Stormwater Retention & Water Quality Improvement 1 Bioretention Overview BIORETENTION: DEFINITION & PURPOSE Suburban and urban development often creates a loss of natural land, negatively impacting natural aquatic systems through an increase of runoff and polluted waters. Bioretention is a regenerative upland-based water quality and quantity control practice that uses the physical, biological and chemical properties of plants, microbes and soils to remove pollutants from stormwater runoff. Bioretention facilities provide several benefits, including water quality improvements, environ- mental stewardship opportunities, aesthetic enrichment and wildlife habitat creation/preserva- tion. There are also various types of bioretention facilities that can be used in an area, and it is important to choose one that suits the particulars of the impacted site. When making a decision on the type of facility to be implemented, the land manager must consider both the aesthetic aspect and stormwater management needs. Bioretention can be used in both residential and industrial settings. The difference between the two is the scale of the design.
  • Managing Storm Water Runoff

    Managing Storm Water Runoff

    Managing Storm Water Runoff Storm water runoff is coming under increasing scrutiny as both a source of pollutants to our lakes and streams, and as a cause of depleted groundwater resources. Commercial parcels A Self-Assessment typically create more runoff per square foot than other land uses, due mostly to large areas of Guide for Wisconsin impervious surfaces such as roofs Businesses and parking lots. This guide provides businesses with the ability to evaluate and improve their existing storm water management practices, and ultimately lead to improved water quality. It begins with a brief description of the extent of the problem, and information on storm water management, with an emphasis on how you as a business can contribute to solving this problem. After working through the runoff self-assessment process, you will be able to evaluate the options available for improving storm water management activities, making sound business decisions about improving your property, and adding value to your enterprise. Urban Growth and the Storm Water Problems Under natural, undeveloped conditions, storm water filters into the soil through openings created by plants and soil animals. In most areas, erosion was stabilized by plant roots, and the water that reached lakes and rivers was cool and clear. As urbanization progressed, the increase of impervious surfaces such as roofs and roadways combined with soil disturbance and compaction to interrupt natural infiltration by diverting runoff directly to surface waters. This resulted in increased flows, eroded soils, and runoff that carried nutrients and other pollutants to lakes and steams. Over time, cities established storm drain systems to prevent erosion and flooding and convey runoff directly to surface waters.
  • Infiltration/Inflow Task Force Report

    Infiltration/Inflow Task Force Report

    INFILTRATION/INFLOW TASK FORCE REPORT A GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR MWRA MEMBER SEWER COMMUNITIES AND REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS MARCH 2001 INFILTRATION/INFLOW TASK FORCE REPORT A GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR MWRA MEMBER SEWER COMMUNITIES AND REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS MARCH 2001 Executive Summary This report is the product of the Infiltration/Inflow (I/I) Task Force. It has been developed through the cooperative efforts of the 43 Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) member sewer communities, MWRA Advisory Board, The Wastewater Advisory Committee (WAC) to the MWRA, Charles River Watershed Association (CRWA), Fore River Watershed Association (FRWA), Mystic River Watershed Association (MRWA), Neponset River Watershed Association (NRWA), South Shore Chamber of Commerce (SSCC), Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and MWRA. The I/I Task Force recommends implementation of the regional I/I reduction goals and implementation strategies detailed in this report. The report outlines a regional I/I reduction plan with appropriate burdens and benefits for stakeholders. The report is intended to be a guidance document for use by local sewer communities, as well as other regional stakeholders, who may tailor appropriate aspects of the report recommendations to their unique situations. Severe storms in October 1996 and June 1998 led to the unusual circumstance of numerous sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) from local and MWRA collection systems. In the aftermath of these events, EPA and DEP began an aggressive effort to make MWRA regulate flows from community sewer systems. MWRA recommended cooperative efforts by local collection system operators, as well as regulators and environmental advocates, would be more effective than a prescriptive, enforcement based approach.
  • Bioretention Fact Sheet

    Bioretention Fact Sheet

    BIORETENTION FACT SHEET Bioretention is a shallow basin or landscaped depression designed to store, infiltrate and treat stormwater runoff. It is excavated and backfilled with well-draining, engineered soil media and planted with native vegetation, grasses or sod. Bioretention systems can also enhance habitat, mitigate for heat island effects and improve water quality. They are designed to temporarily hold (24 hours post rain event) BIORETENTION POLLUTANT REMOVAL1 and slowly infiltrate stormwater runoff. Bioretention systems use many pollutant removal mechanisms (i.e., infiltration, absorption, of suspended adsorption, evapotranspiration, microbial and biological 85% solids decomposition, plant uptake, sedimentation and filtration) to of phosphorus improve stormwater quality prior to it leaving the system. Filtered 80% runoff can exfiltrate into surrounding native soils, or these of nitrogen systems can be designed to use an underdrain to collect and return 60% filtered runoff to the conveyance system. Bioretention systems are of fecal coliform most effective when used to treat small to moderate quantities of 90% stormwater. 95% of metals As with any type of infrastructure, bioretention and other green infrastructure practices require maintenance to ensure continued functionality. Key maintenance activities include stabilizing erosion and removal of sediment, trash and debris, particularly if inlet or outlet structure openings are impeded. General inspections and assessment of five critical features can keep the practice operational. Visual clues for inspection can be used at any time, but it is ideal to inspect the bioretention system shortly after a moderately-sized rainfall event (~ 1 inch) and, again, 24-hours later to ensure runoff is entering the bioretention cell and infiltrating.
  • Green Roof for Stormwater Management in a Highly Urbanized Area: the Case of Seoul, Korea

    Green Roof for Stormwater Management in a Highly Urbanized Area: the Case of Seoul, Korea

    sustainability Article Green Roof for Stormwater Management in a Highly Urbanized Area: The Case of Seoul, Korea Muhammad Shafique 1,2, Reeho Kim 1,2,* and Kwon Kyung-Ho 3 1 Department of Smart City and Construction Engineering, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, University of Science & Technology (UST), 217, Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34113, Korea; shafi[email protected] 2 Environmental & Plant Engineering Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 83, Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10223, Korea 3 Urban Water Cycle Research Center, Korea Institute of Safe Drinking Water Research, Anyang si, Gyeonggi-do 14059, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-9100-291 Received: 26 December 2017; Accepted: 21 February 2018; Published: 26 February 2018 Abstract: Urbanization changes natural pervious surfaces to hard, impervious surfaces such as roads, buildings and roofs. These modifications significantly affect the natural hydrologic cycle by increasing stormwater runoff rates and volume. Under these circumstances, green roofs offer multiple benefits including on-site stormwater management that mimics the natural hydrologic conditions in an urban area. It can retain a large amount of rainwater for a longer time and delay the peak discharge. However, there is very limited research that has been carried out on the retrofitted green roof for stormwater management for South Korean conditions. This study has investigated the performance of retrofitted green roofs for stormwater management in a highly urbanized area of Seoul, the capital city of Korea. In this study, various storm events were monitored and the research results were analyzed to check the performance of the green roof with controlling the runoff in urban areas.
  • Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities

    Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities

    RECOMMENDED STANDARDS for WASTEWATER FACILITIES POLICIES FOR THE DESIGN, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT FACILITIES 2014 EDITION A REPORT OF THE WASTEWATER COMMITTEE OF THE GREAT LAKES - UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BOARD OF STATE AND PROVINCIAL PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERS MEMBER STATES AND PROVINCE ILLINOIS NEW YORK INDIANA OHIO IOWA ONTARIO MICHIGAN PENNSYLVANIA MINNESOTA WISCONSIN MISSOURI PUBLISHED BY: Health Research, Inc., Health Education Services Division P.O. Box 7126 Albany, N.Y. 12224 Phone: (518) 439-7286 Visit Our Web Site http://www.healthresearch.org/store/ten-state-standards Copyright © 2014 by the Great Lakes - Upper Mississippi River Board of State and Provincial Public Health and Environmental Managers This document, or portions thereof, may be reproduced without permission if credit is given to the Board and to this publication as a source. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE FOREWORD ..................................................................................................................................... v 10 ENGINEERING REPORTS AND FACILITY PLANS 10. General ............................................................................................................................. 10-1 11. Engineering Report Or Facility Plan ................................................................................ 10-1 12. Pre-Design Meeting ....................................................................................................... 10-12
  • Urban Flooding Mitigation Techniques: a Systematic Review and Future Studies

    Urban Flooding Mitigation Techniques: a Systematic Review and Future Studies

    water Review Urban Flooding Mitigation Techniques: A Systematic Review and Future Studies Yinghong Qin 1,2 1 College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China; [email protected]; Tel.: +86-0771-323-2464 2 College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, 100 University Road, Nanning 530004, China Received: 20 November 2020; Accepted: 14 December 2020; Published: 20 December 2020 Abstract: Urbanization has replaced natural permeable surfaces with roofs, roads, and other sealed surfaces, which convert rainfall into runoff that finally is carried away by the local sewage system. High intensity rainfall can cause flooding when the city sewer system fails to carry the amounts of runoff offsite. Although projects, such as low-impact development and water-sensitive urban design, have been proposed to retain, detain, infiltrate, harvest, evaporate, transpire, or re-use rainwater on-site, urban flooding is still a serious, unresolved problem. This review sequentially discusses runoff reduction facilities installed above the ground, at the ground surface, and underground. Mainstream techniques include green roofs, non-vegetated roofs, permeable pavements, water-retaining pavements, infiltration trenches, trees, rainwater harvest, rain garden, vegetated filter strip, swale, and soakaways. While these techniques function differently, they share a common characteristic; that is, they can effectively reduce runoff for small rainfalls but lead to overflow in the case of heavy rainfalls. In addition, most of these techniques require sizable land areas for construction. The end of this review highlights the necessity of developing novel, discharge-controllable facilities that can attenuate the peak flow of urban runoff by extending the duration of the runoff discharge.
  • Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention for Pima County

    Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention for Pima County

    Pima County Regional Flood Control District Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Supplement to Title 16, Chapter 16.48, Runoff Detention Systems Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management Ordinance Pima County Regional Flood Control District 97 E. Congress St., 3rd Floor Tucson, AZ 85701-1791 (520) 724 -4600 June 2014 _________________ Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention for Pima County REVISIONS Because of ongoing regulatory and technical changes in the fields of floodplain and stormwater management, revisions to this manual will be required from time to time. Such revisions will be approved by the Floodplain Administrator. Hard copy (printed) revisions will not be distributed. It is the holder’s responsibility to keep the document current by periodically checking the Regional Flood Control District’s web page for new digital versions. The revision history of the document is listed below. Chronology of Publication, Updates and Revisions Description Date First Edition June 2014 Chapter 6 Revised to Include Benefits of February 2015 Multiple-Use Basins I _________________ Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention for Pima County TABLE OF CONTENTS No. Description Page No. 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Ordinance Overview and Detention Requirements ..................................................2
  • Comparison of Water Discharge from Three Parking Lots in Nacogdoches

    Comparison of Water Discharge from Three Parking Lots in Nacogdoches

    Comparison of Water Pollutant Discharge from Three Parking Lots in Nacogdoches Mary-Leigh Winkler, Emily Greenstein, Turner McDougal, Bryce German Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Sheryll B. Jerez (Environmental Science) Stephen F. AusJn State University Nacogdoches, TX Introduc)on pH of Storm water Runoff Discussion & Conclusion Storm water runoff can have harmful effects on a community. Our results concluded that Pecan Park had a higher DO and higher Runoff water picks up chemicals and pollutants from surfaces 8.2 pH which is a result because of the large amount of organic materials that do not absorb water like concrete areas (ex. roads, 8 7.8 found near the park parking lot. Our results concluded that Pecan parking lots, and others) The same water will then eventually 7.6 Park had the best water quality which coincided with our hypothesis. be drained into local lakes, rivers, and surrounding 7.4 Sample 1 Although our total research results were inconclusive, the prevenJon environment. Our experiment measured the pollutant 7.2 of hazardous pollutants into storm water runoff is sJll an important Sample 2 discharge of parking lots aer a storm. The main water quality 7 issue. To keep Nacogdoches beauJful and have good water quality, Sample 3 indicators are temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and 6.8 the three possible soluJons are as follows: Permeable Pavements, turbidity/alkalinity. For the parking lot runoff measurements, 6.6 Rain Gardens, and a Water Quality Awareness Day. 6.4 the parameters we measured included copper and lead. Our 6.2 • Permeable Pavements: A large amount of contaminants entered hypothesis was that there are more metal pollutants and Wal-Mart Car Wash Peacan ParkPecan Park into the ecosystem when new development or construcJon is poorer quality in a Wal-Mart parking lot and car wash parking occurring in the community.
  • Full Document (Pdf 1196

    Full Document (Pdf 1196

    Final Report GeoEngineers On-Call Agreement Y-7717 Task Order AU AN APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING INFILTRATION RATES FOR STORMWATER INFILTRATION DRY WELLS by Joel Massmann, Ph.D., P.E. Washington State Department of Transportation Technical Monitor Glorilyn Maw Washington State Transportation Commission Department of Transportation and in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration April 2004 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. WA-RD 589.1 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE AN APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING INFILTRATION April 2004 RATES FOR STORMWATER INFILTRATION DRY WELLS 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Joel Massmann, Ph.D., P.E. 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Agreement Y7717, Task AU 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED Research Office Final Research Report Washington State Department of Transportation Transportation Building, MS 47372 Olympia, Washington 98504-7372 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Keith Anderson, Project Manager, 360-709-5405 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This study was conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. ABSTRACT This report describes an approach for estimating infiltration rates for dry wells that are constructed using standard configurations developed by the Washington State Department of Transportation. The approach was developed recognizing that the performance of these dry wells depends upon a combination of subsurface geology, groundwater conditions, and dry well geometry. The report focuses on dry wells located in unconsolidated geologic materials.