11 Food Sovereignty Neither Growing Nor Yielding, but Fighting for Good Food for All!
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
11 Food Sovereignty Neither Growing nor Yielding, but Fighting for Good Food for All! By: About the authors and their positions Irmi Salzer and Julianna Fehlinger We see ourselves as part of the movement for food sovereignty and are wri- ting from the perspective of the Österreichische Berg- und Kleinbäuer_in- Translated by: nenvereinigung ÖBV – Via Campesina !ustria" #$rmi %al&er' and the agro- Santiago Killing-Stringer political group !grar !ttac #(ulianna )ehlinger'* We are mainly active in !us- Release date: trian networ+s and participate in the ,y-l-ni movement for food sover- 1 !"1!#"1 eignty* We are also involved in the European ,y-l-ni process and are thus connected to partners throughout Europe* $rmi %al&er is an organic farmer htt$%&'/www!degrowth!de' en/dim' in Burgenland and (ulianna )ehlinger is sometimes a community farmer and sometimes an alpine farmer* 1. What is the key idea of food souvereignty? Food souvereignty: The right of all people to democratically decide how food is produced distributed and consumed )ood sovereignty as a concept was /rst presented in 1996 at the World )ood %ummit of the )ood and !griculture 2rganisation of the United ,ations #)!2' by 4a Via ampesina56 a global organisation of small farmers, rural wor+ers6 /shing communities, and landless and indigenous peoples. %ince then, food sovereignty has evolved into the political leitmotif of a growing number of social actors from the widest possible range of societal groups /ghting for the transformation of a global food and agricultural system do- minated by industrial interests and focused solely on pro/t* !t the beginning of the 1990s6 small farmers’ movements #at /rst mainly in 4atin !merica and Europe6 then in the rest of the world' realised that6 in light of the globalisation of agricultural mar+ets and the increasing political power of institutions such as the W92 in the agriculture sector6 it was ne- cessary to form a globally active alliance of farmers. By founding 4a Via Campesina they sought to oppose through a strong transnational movement the neoliberal tendencies that were restricting the lives and survival chances of millions of small farmers and worsening the situation of hungry people all over the globe* !s an answer to the technical term :food security8 that was coined by the )!2 and that fails to address a number of ;uestions, the young movement developed the concept of :food sovereignty8* )ood sover- eignty addresses the power structures in which our food system is embed- ded< it addresses the conditions of food production and distribution; it asks about the conse;uences of our production methods for future generations; and it places the people who produce and consume food products at centre stage* 1Austrian Association of Mountain Farmers – Via Campesina 2Literally ‘the peasants’ way’ " 11 Food Sovereignty Neither Growing nor Yielding, but Fighting for Good Food for All! (he $rin)i$le% of food %o*ereignt+ )ood sovereignty can be understood as a framewor+ that must continuously be :/lled up8 through concrete6 local measures* )ood sovereignty cannot be de/ned from the top down and for all time6 but can only be shaped through a collective process of dialogue* 9hroughout the ,y-l-ni process #,y-l-ni is the name used by the global food sovereignty movement to refer to itself< see below)6 the attempt has been made to de/ne the main principles of food sovereignty based on the wide range of realities of both the farmers and the :eaters8* %uch principles include valuing food producers, the primary import- ance of feeding the population #instead of producing for e=port'6 the esta- blishment of local production systems and the strengthening of local con- trol over food6 the development of +nowledge and skills, and6 last but not least6 wor+ing with nature instead of against it* )ood sovereignty encompasses the rights of individuals, communities and institutions #including states)6 as well as a responsible relationship with na- ture6 animals and other human beings. $n the prevailing agricultural and food system6 a ma>ority of producers are denied their right to democratically participate in all political areas contingent to the production, processing and distribution of food products. $nternational trade agreements, agricultu- ral subsidies, ?@2 legislation, hygiene regulations, directives regarding ac- cess to mar+ets, production regulations, etc* are on the whole adopted wi- thout the people directly aAected having any right to participate in the pro- cess. 9he right to democratically choose and monitor agricultural6 food6 /s- hing6 social6 trade or energy policies is a necessary /rst step in order to en- force other rights such as the right to food6 education and access to re- sources. 2nly when these rights are enforced is it possible for producers to ful/l their responsibility regarding natural resources such as the soil6 and biodiversity and the climate6 so that future generations are also able to produce high- ;uality foods. )ood sovereignty means we must act in solidarity* 9ransnational solidarity6 networ+ing and mutual support are necessary to /ght against e=ploitation and domination mechanisms. 4ocal resistance and local alternatives must be completed through a global perspective* !. Who is part of food souvereignty what do they do? From the peasants to the eaters– defining food sovereignty together and uniting social and ecological struggles in the South and %orth )ood sovereignty has been developed since the 1990s as an alternative for the ?lobal ,orth and %outh* !t the beginning, the debate around food sover- eignty was mainly led by La -ia .am$e%ina* However6 La -ia .am$e%ina reco- 5 11 Food Sovereignty Neither Growing nor Yielding, but Fighting for Good Food for All! gnised early on that a profound change and democratisation of agriculture and food systems can only be achieved if the movement sought to form al- liances beyond those with producers, and to forge ties with other move- ments. Thus, the /rst $nternational )orum for )ood %overeignty6 the N+/léni )orum6 too+ place in @ali in 577C* 9ogether with initiatives and organisati- ons connected with environmental6 human rights,consumer protection,wo- men’s, and also urban movements, the principles of food sovereignty were developed6 and common goals, opponents and demands were identi/ed* %in- ce then6 both regional forums #for e=ample the Europe )orum for )ood %o- vereignty in Krems, !ustria in 57""' and national forums have been held* Ba- sed on the common principles of democratisation, solidarity6 local control6 and greater care for the environment6 movements for food sovereignty are continuously see+ing to both create and advance alternative practices. With regard to production models, adaptable #resilient' agro-ecological pro- duction methods are tested that6 for e=ample6 use open-pollinated6 non- ?@2 seeds6 reduce agricultural dependence on oil and are based on natural cycles. $n the area of food supply6 producer-consumer networ+s are constructed6 e*g. by replacing traditional mar+ets with relationships based on solidarity #Community %upported !griculture - .SA'6 or by ensuring that producers earn a living wage through collective buying. Darticipatory ?uarantee %ys- tems #D?%' are trust-based certi/cation systems that replace state control and supervision6 and alternative education networ+s enable +nowledge sha- ring on an e;ual footing, creating a collective space for all those involved in the agricultural and food system* $n order to stop the competition for land and soil and allow access to land for everybody who wants to farm it6 models are being developed that remo- ve land from the capitalist cycle of e=ploitation and promote the use of land as a commons. The food sovereignty movement demands global social rights and digni/ed wor+ conditions for all peopleEirrespective of their social origins or genderE throughout the agriculture and food system* Through emancipatory processes6 citi&ens should be empowered to partici- pate actively and e;ually in shaping the political framewor+ of the agricul- ture and food system* $n this respect6 the actors in the ?lobal %outh and ,orth face both similar and dissimilar political and social problems. The di- versity of the groups coming together under the :big tent8 #Datel 5770' of food sovereignty is a strength6 but also a challenge for the global food sover- eignty movement* 0emocrati%ation and the right to ha*e rights $n order to enforce the right to democratic participation in the agriculture F 11 Food Sovereignty Neither Growing nor Yielding, but Fighting for Good Food for All! and food system6 it is necessary to create conditions that do not arise of their own accord in our societies mar+ed by e=clusion and domination. 4ow- income people6 migrants and women are often particularly shut out from participation. The food sovereignty movement is therefore /ghting for con- ditions that enable all people to demand and enforce their social6 economic and cultural rights and their right to participate in decision-ma+ing proces- ses. &. 'ow do you see the relationship between food souvereignty and (egrowth? Working together against false alternatives and for social)ecological trans) formation $n the ?erman-spea+ing world6 degrowth and food sovereignty are closely related6 being often supported by the same activists and similar initiatives #such as Community %upported !griculture6 urban gardening, ecological agriculture6 food co-ops6 the occupation of /elds' or are based on the same approaches for alternative paths #e*g. subsistence6 unconditional basic inco- me6 commons, environmental and climate >ustice'* !ll these approaches and initiatives are areas of e=perimentation for both food sovereignty and de- growth* $n both movements, the combination Emainly non-institutionalE of science6 social movements and practical #collective' e=perience plays an im- portant role* Both food sovereignty and degrowth envision a new type of prosperity and well-being, one that includes social-ecological forms of production on the one hand6 and a comprehensive democratisation of society #and the econo- my' on the other* $n both cases the aim is to create new values that enable a good life for all based on solidarity and ecological living.