DOCSLIB.ORG

EIFAAC International Symposium Recreational Fishing in an Era of Change Lillehammer, Norway 14 – 17 June 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EIFAAC International Symposium Recreational Fishing in an Era of Change Lillehammer, Norway 14 – 17 June 2015 REPORT M-369 | 2015 EIFAAC International Symposium Recreational fishing in an era of change Lillehammer, Norway 14 – 17 June 2015 COLOPHON Executive institution Norwegian Environment Agency Project manager for the contractor Contact person in the Norwegian Environment Agency Øystein Aas Arne Eggereide M-no Year Pages Contract number 369 2015 70 Publisher The project is funded by Norwegian Environment Agency, NINA, NASCO, Norwegian Environment Agency EIFAAC Registration Fees Author(s) Øystein Aas (editor) Title – Norwegian and English EIFAAC International Symposium - Recreational fishing in an era of change. Symposium Program and Abstracts. Summary – sammendrag Norway host an international symposium on recreational fisheries initiated and organised through the European Inland Fisheries and Aquaculture Advisory Commission (EIFAAC), in Lillehammer, 14 – 17 June 2015. Nearly 200 participants from around 20 countries have registered for the meeting. This report presents the full program of the Symposium, including abstracts for the more than 100 presentations given at the meeting. 4 emneord 4 subject words Konferanse, fritidsfiske, EIFAAC, program Conference, programme, EIFAAC, angling Front page photo Øystein Aas 2 EIFAAC International Symposium | M-369 | 2015 Content 1. Preface ....................................................................................................... 4 2. Symposium organisation ................................................................................... 5 3. Supporters and sponsors ................................................................................... 6 4. Main Programme ............................................................................................ 7 5. EIFAAC Symposium Abstracts .......................................................................... 10 5.1 Keynote presentations ............................................................................. 10 5.2 Technical Parallel Sessions ....................................................................... 14 A1: Integrative Management of Esox Lucius Considering Ecological, Evolutionary and Socio-economic Perspectives. Chairs: Skov & Arlinghaus ................................. 14 B1a: Crayfish Recreational Fisheries Management: Challenges and Opportunities. Chairs: Johnson & Skurdal ........................................................................ 18 B1b & B2: Use of Data Collected from Anglers for Management of Recreational Fisheries. Chairs: Pope, Wilde, Aarts & Sawynok ............................................. 19 C1: Participation and Monitoring of Recreational Fisheries, Recruitment and Outreach. Chairs: Fjeldseth & Evensen ...................................................................... 26 D1: Social Dynamics in C&R Fisheries. Chairs: Stensland & Kagervall ................... 31 A2a: Challenges and Opportunities in Using Reference Points for the Management of Recreational Fisheries for Atlantic Salmon. Chairs: Vehanen & Hutchinson ............. 36 B2: See above on B1b .............................................................................. 39 C2: Trans-disciplinary Approaches to Sustainable Fish Stocking and the Besatzfisch Project. Chair: Arlinghaus ........................................................................ 40 D2: C&R Fisheries – New Insights from Fish Biology Research. Chairs: Uglem & Kraabøl .......................................................................... 44 A3: The Right Angle – Balancing Biological, Social and Economic Goals in the Management of Recreational Fisheries. (NB. Starts with Intro 1230 after Session A2) Chairs: Hyder & Strehlow ......................................................................... 49 B3: Trait-based Vulnerability of Fish to Angling Gear. Chairs: Köck & Arlinghaus ...... 54 C3: Sustainable Fishing Tourism in Freshwater Environments Chair: Liberg ............. 58 D3: Stocking for Conservation – the Cases of Salmon, Eel and Sturgeon. The IMPRESS Project. Chairs: Weltzien & Mayer ............................................................ 61 6. Graduate student’s grant for best presentations sponsored by NASCO ......................... 65 7. List of Participants ....................................................................................... 66 3 EIFAAC International Symposium | M-369 | 2015 1. Preface EIFAAC, the European Inland Fisheries and Aquaculture Advisory Commission, has for decades promoted and encouraged informed, sustainable and science-based use, management and conservation of freshwater fish resources. An important milestone event took place in 1996 with the EIFAC Symposium on Social, Economic and Management aspects of recreational fisheries in Dublin chaired by Phil Hickley and Helena Tompkins. This symposium established a platform for the development of European recreational fisheries including the promotion of applied and multidisciplinary “recreational fisheries sciences”. These themes were later addressed in EIFAC recreational fisheries symposia, annual meetings, by several working groups and specific activities with the aim to professionalize and improve recreational fisheries management and development in Europe. Outputs include for instance the Code of practice for recreational fishing (2008) and the Guidelines for assessing social and economic benefits of recreational fisheries (2010). Europe is seeing a rapid transformation in social issues, e.g. there has been a shift in values caused by globalization and urbanization, as well as by more recent and very different challenges such as climate change and the economic crisis in several countries. All this influences freshwater fisheries and recreational fishing in many ways. It might affect behavior and preferred outcomes of recreational fisheries, recruitment of anglers and the general standing of recreational fisheries and freshwater resources in society as well as how we manage and utilize freshwater resources in a wider sense. While we have seen improvements in the ecological status of some aquatic environments, e.g. reduction in nutrient loading in lakes and reduction in acid deposition, there are new pressures e.g. the demand for carbon neutral electricity through hydropower. At the same time, rural areas are constantly seeking to capitalize on their natural resources through tourism, including fishing tourism as a means to create jobs and income. In order to address many of these and other issues the 2015 EIFAAC Symposium “Managing recreational freshwater fisheries in an era of change” bring together stakeholders, managers, scientists and users to focus on the multidisciplinary challenges of sustainable recreational fisheries management. The Symposium endeavors to provide a forum for exchange of novel research, practical experiences and management approaches that foster and support sustainable recreational fisheries. Nearly 200 participants and contributors have signed up for the meeting, which will have more than 100 presentations from scientists, managers, NGOs and business representatives from approximately 20 countries. We look forward to the symposium and will use the opportunity to thank all participants and contributors for their eager and friendly responses so far! On behalf of the organizing committee, Øystein Aas, Symposium Project Leader 4 EIFAAC International Symposium | M-369 | 2015 2. Symposium organisation Organising committee Petri Heinimaa, Finland Miran Aprahamian, United Kingdom Cathal Gallagher, Ireland Arne Eggereide, Norway Robert Arlinghaus, Germany Tomislav Treer, Croatia Håkan Carlstrand, Sweden Carl Burger, USA Brian Graeb, USA Ian Winfield, UK Øyvind Fjeldseth, Norwegian Hunters and Anglers Association Torfinn Evensen, Norwegian Salmon Rivers Ola Hegge, County Administration Oppland, Norway Berit Torsbakken, County Administration Oppland, Norway Øystein Aas, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Norway (Symposium project leader) [email protected] ; phone + 47 934 66 710 5 EIFAAC International Symposium | M-369 | 2015 3. Supporters and sponsors American Fisheries Society – AFS www.fisheries.org European Angling Alliance - EAA www.eaa-europe.org European Fishing Tackle and Trade Association - EFTTA www.eftta.com Fisheries Society of the British Isles - FSBI www.fsbi.org.uk Institute of Fisheries Management - IFM www.ifm.org.uk North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organisation - NASCO www.nasco.int Norwegian Hunters’ and Anglers’ Alliance www.njff.no Norwegian Salmon Rivers www.lakseelver.no Lillehammer Museum, Maihaugen (http://www.maihaugen.no/en/Maihaugen/) Oppland County Council (http://oppland.org/Oppland-English/) County Governor Administration Oppland http://www.fylkesmannen.no/en/Oppland/ Norwegian Institute for Nature Research http://www.nina.no/ninaenglish/Start.aspx 6 EIFAAC International Symposium | M-369 | 2015 4. Main Programme Sunday 14th June 2015 From 1400: Registration 1900 - 2100: “Get together” barbeque in the Lillehammer Radisson Hotel Garden Monday 15th June 2015 From 0700: Breakfast 0800 - 1000: Registration 1000 – 1230: Plenary Opening of Symposium. Recreational fisheries in an era of change – an international perspective. Chair: Head of Department, Mr Raoul Bierach, Norwegian Environment Agency 1000 – 1015: Opening. Welcome to Lillehammer and Oppland. County Governor of Oppland, Ms Christl Kvam 1015 – 1030: Aim and goal of Symposium. Symposium project leader Professor, Dr. Øystein Aas, NINA, Norway 1030 – 1105: Demographic, economic and social change in sustainable recreational fisheries
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profiles The Republic of Uzbekistan Part I Overview and main indicators 1. Country brief 2. FAO Fisheries statistics Part II Narrative (2008) 3. Production sector Inland sub-sector Aquaculture sub-sector Recreational sub-sector 4. Post-harvest sector Fish utilization Source of information United Nations Geospatial Information Section http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/english/htmain.htm Fish markets Imagery for continents and oceans reproduced from GEBCO, www.gebco.net 5. Socio-economic contribution of the fishery sector Role of fisheries in the national economy Supply and demand Trade Food security Employment Rural development 6. Trends, issues and development Constraints and opportunities Government and non-government sector policies and development strategies Research, education and training Foreign aid 7. Institutional framework 8. Legal framework Additional information 9. FAO Thematic data bases 10. Publications 11. Meetings & News archive FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Part I Overview and main indicators Part I of the Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profile is compiled using the most up-to-date information available from the FAO Country briefs and Statistics programmes at the time of publication. The Country Brief and the FAO Fisheries Statistics provided in Part I may, however, have been prepared at different times, which would explain any inconsistencies. Country brief Prepared: March 2018 Uzbekistan covers an area of 447400km2. It is a landlocked country and mountains dominate the landscape in the east and northeast. The fisheries in Uzbekistan comprise two main components, namely inland capture fisheries and aquaculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Centre Research Reports 2006 Volume 14 Number 6
    ISSN 1198-6727 Fisheries Centre Research Reports 2006 Volume 14 Number 6 CATCHING MORE BAIT: A BOTTOM-UP RE-ESTIMATION OF GLOBAL FISHERIES SUBSIDIES Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada CATCHING MORE BAIT: A BOTTOM-UP RE-ESTIMATION OF GLOBAL FISHERIES SUBSIDIES edited by Ussif Rashid Sumaila and Daniel Pauly Fisheries Centre Research Reports 14(6) 114 pages © published 2006 by The Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 1Z4 ISSN 1198-6727 Fisheries Centre Research Reports 14(6) 2006 CATCHING MORE BAIT: A BOTTOM-UP RE-ESTIMATION OF GLOBAL FISHERIES SUBSIDIES edited by Ussif Rashid Sumaila and Daniel Pauly CONTENTS Page DIRECTOR’S FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................ 3 CHAPTER 1 THE NATURE AND MAGNITUDE OF GLOBAL NON-FUEL FISHERIES SUBSIDIES KHAN, A. S., U. R. SUMAILA, R. WATSON, G. MUNRO AND D. PAULY............................................. 5 CHAPTER 2 FUEL SUBSIDIES TO GLOBAL FISHERIES SUMAILA, U.R., L. TEH, R. WATSON, P. TYEDMERS AND D. PAULY .............................................. 38 CHAPTER 3 SUBSIDIES TO HIGH SEAS BOTTOM TRAWL FLEETS SUMAILA,
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Meeting of the American Fisheries Society
    September 17, 2008 MEMORANDUM TO: H. Brent Clayton, Chief Environmental Technical Support Branch Division of Site and Environmental Reviews Office of New Reactors FROM: Harriet L. Nash, Aquatic Biologist /RA/ Environmental Technical Support Branch Division of Site and Environmental Reviews Office of New Reactors SUBJECT: FOREIGN TRIP REPORT: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY The enclosed trip report describes the August 17 - 22, 2008, 138th Annual Meeting of the American Fisheries Society, Ottawa, Canada in which I participated. The report is a combined quick look and final report. The content of this report is not likely to be of interest to the Commission. CONTACT: Harriet Nash, NRO/DSER/RENV (301) 415-4100 Enclosure: Foreign Trip Report w/Attachment: Meeting Agenda MEMORANDUM TO: H. Brent Clayton, Chief Environmental Technical Support Branch Division of Site and Environmental Reviews Office of New Reactors FROM: Harriet L. Nash, Aquatic Biologist Environmental Technical Support Branch Division of Site and Environmental Reviews Office of New Reactors SUBJECT: FOREIGN TRIP REPORT: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY The enclosed trip report describes the August 17 - 22, 2008, 138th Annual Meeting of the American Fisheries Society, Ottawa, Canada in which I participated. The report is a combined quick look and final report. The content of this report is not likely to be of interest to the Commission. CONTACT: Harriet Nash, NRO/DSER/RENV (301) 415-4100 Enclosure: Foreign Trip Report w/Attachment: Meeting Agenda Distribution: HNash [email protected] ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER: ML082590548 OFFICE PM:DSER:RENV:NRO LA:DSER:RAP2:NRO NAME HNash ARedden DATE 09/17/08 09/16/08 OFFICAL RECORD COPY U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Animal Welfare in U.S Fish Culture
    AQUATIC ANIMAL WELFARE IN U.S FISH CULTURE F. S. Conte Department of Animal Science University of California Davis 60th Annual Northwest Fish Culture Conference Redding, CA December 1-3, 2009 Animal Rights People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) http://www.animalactivist.com/ Animal Rights & Animal Welfare Animal Rights: A philosophy that animals have the same rights as people. Objective: to end the use of animals as companions and pets, and in extreme cases, opposition to the use of animals for food, fiber, entertainment and medical research. Animal Welfare: Concern for the well-being of individual animals, unrelated to the perceived rights of the animal or the ecological dynamics of the species. The position usually focuses on the morality of human action (or inaction), as opposed to making deeper political or philosophical claims about the status of animals Fish Welfare: A challenge to the feeling-based approach, with implications to recreational fisheries Table 1 Implications of animal welfare, animal liberation and animal rights concepts for the socially accepted interaction of humans with fish. Animal welfare Animal Animal Criteria liberation rights Fish have intrinsic value Yes/No No Yes Fish have rights No No Yes Duties towards fish Yes Yes Yes Catch, kill and eat Yes No No Regulatory catch-and-release Yes No No Voluntary catch-and-release Yes No No Recreational fishing Yes No No Fishery management Yes No No Use of animals (food, work, Yes No No manufacture, recreation and science) Robert Arlinghaus, Steven J. Cooke, Alexander Schwab & Ian G. Cowx. Fish and Fisheries, 2007, 8, 57-71.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsustainable Marine Fisheries Daniel Pauly
    Sustainable Development Law & Policy Volume 7 Article 5 Issue 1 Fall 2006: Ocean & Fisheries Law Unsustainable Marine Fisheries Daniel Pauly Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/sdlp Part of the Environmental Law Commons, International Law Commons, and the Law of the Sea Commons Recommended Citation Pauly, Daniel. “Unsustainable Marine Fisheries.” Sustainable Development Law & Policy, Fall 2006, 10-12, 79. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sustainable Development Law & Policy by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNSUSTAINABLE MARINE FISHERIES by Daniel Pauly* INTRODUCTION HISTORIC ANTECEDENT Many have long assumed that the expanse and mysterious While fisheries7 and localized overexploitation have depths of the world’s oceans contain vast living resources, ready occurred for millennia,8 the massive impact of fishing on ocean to be exploited in the ways that its more familiar coastal fringes ecosystems began only in the early nineteenth century, when have. This assumption is very wrong. Of the 362 million square English steam trawlers began to land their catches.9 These kilometers of ocean on this planet, only 7.5 percent — the conti- trawlers were soon rendered more effective by power winches nental shelves — are shallower than 200 meters (“m”), and some and, following World War I, diesel engines. The aftermath of of this shelf area is covered by ice.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 20062006 NationalNational SurveySurvey ofof Fishing,Fishing, Hunting,Hunting, andand Wildlife-AssociatedWildlife-Associated RecreationRecreation FHW/06-NAT 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of Commerce Dirk Kempthorne, Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary Secretary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Economics and Statistics Administration H. Dale Hall, Cynthia A. Glassman, Director Under Secretary for Economic Affairs U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Charles Louis Kincannon, Director U.S. Department of the Interior Economics and Statistics Dirk Kempthorne, Administration Secretary Cynthia A. Glassman, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service H. Dale Hall, Director U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Charles Louis Kincannon, Director Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Rowan Gould, Assistant Director The U.S. Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientifi c and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsi- bilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affi liated Island Communities. The mission of the Department’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fi sh, wildlife, and their habitats for the continuing benefi t of the American people. The Service is responsible for national programs of vital importance to our natural resources, including administration of the Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Programs. These two programs provide fi nan- cial assistance to the States for projects to enhance and protect fi sh and wildlife resources and to assure their availability to the public for recreational purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Recreational Fishing Participation Among Alaska Residents
    Special Publication No. 06-20 Factors Affecting Recreational Fishing Participation among Alaska Residents by William J. Romberg July 2006 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Measures (fisheries) centimeter cm Alaska Administrative fork length FL deciliter dL Code AAC mideye-to-fork MEF gram g all commonly accepted mideye-to-tail-fork METF hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., standard length SL kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. total length TL kilometer km all commonly accepted liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., Mathematics, statistics meter m R.N., etc. all standard mathematical milliliter mL at @ signs, symbols and millimeter mm compass directions: abbreviations east E alternate hypothesis HA Weights and measures (English) north N base of natural logarithm e cubic feet per second ft3/s south S catch per unit effort CPUE foot ft west W coefficient of variation CV gallon gal copyright © common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) inch in corporate suffixes: confidence interval CI mile mi Company Co. correlation coefficient nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Participation in Recreational Fishing
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources Natural Resources, School of 12-2013 Spatial and Temporal Participation in Recreational Fishing Dustin R. Martin University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresdiss Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Martin, Dustin R., "Spatial and Temporal Participation in Recreational Fishing" (2013). Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources. 79. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresdiss/79 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL PARTICIPATION IN RECREATIONAL FISHING by Dustin R. Martin A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Natural Resource Sciences Under the Supervision of Professor Kevin L. Pope Lincoln, Nebraska December, 2013 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL PARTICIPATION IN RECREATIONAL FISHING Dustin Robert Martin, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2013 Advisor: Kevin L. Pope Buffering inland fisheries against large-scale changes in ecosystem function, climate regimes, and societal valuations of natural resources requires progressive management approaches that incorporate fish and angler dynamics at large spatial and temporal scales. Current paradigms of inland fishery management generally utilize waterbody-specific, fish-centric frameworks designed to regulate fish populations directly, and anglers indirectly, through fish stock enhancement and harvest regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish & Wildlife Service Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildli
    To: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge 5396 VT Route 105 Brunswick, VT 05905 Re: Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge Recreational Hunting and Fishing Plan for New Hampshire and Vermont Position: Support Date: July 6, 2021 To Whom It May Concern: My name is Joseph Mullin, and I am the Assistant Manager, Northeastern States for the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF). As an avid sportsman, and a non-resident license holder who enjoys participating in the many outdoor opportunities that New Hampshire and Vermont have to offer, I submit this letter to express our general support while providing additional recommendations on the Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge Recreational Hunting and Fishing Plan for New Hampshire and Vermont (Hunting and Fishing Plan). It is my earnest hope that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service takes these recommendations into account when producing a final plan for this National Fish and Wildlife Refuge. Since 1989, CSF has dedicated itself to the mission of working with Congress, governors, and state legislatures to protect and advance hunting, angling, recreational shooting and trapping. The unique and collective force of the Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus, the Governors Sportsmen's Caucus, and the National Assembly of Sportsmen's Caucuses, working closely with CSF, and with the support of major hunting, recreational fishing and shooting, and trapping organizations, serves as an unprecedented network of pro-sportsmen elected officials that advance the conservation interests of America's hunters and anglers. It is from this voice – with more than three decades of organizational history and a staff with more than a century of combined policy experience on sportsmen’s issues – that we strongly support the proposed Hunting and Fishing Plan and offer additional recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Welfare in Recreational Fishing
    Chapter 19 Fish Welfare in Recreational Fishing Keno Ferter, Steven J. Cooke, Odd-Børre Humborstad, Jonatan Nilsson, and Robert Arlinghaus Abstract Recreational fishing is a popular activity around the globe, and fish welfare issues related to the activity have received increasing attention in some countries, particularly in central and northern Europe and Australia. This chapter offers an introduction to recreational fishing, reviews literature on fish welfare in relation to recreational fishing and provides an overview of potential biological impacts and ways to reduce such impacts. We first focus on the question on how to reduce impacts on the welfare of the fish during recreational fishing. Second, we describe two case studies highlighting that practical implications of the fish welfare discourse may be disjointed from the scientific information base and be rather about fundamental moral questions about the ethical acceptability of the activity per se. We end by providing an outlook on the future of recreational fishing in the light of the current fish welfare discourse. Keywords Best practice guidelines · Catch-and-release · Fish welfare · Function- based approach · Recreational fishing · Sublethal impacts Recreational fishing is a popular activity around the globe (Arlinghaus et al. 2015, 2019). Apart from the recognized biological and socio-economic importance of recreational fishing, fish welfare issues related to the activity have received increas- ing attention in some countries and in the academic literature (Huntingford et al. 2006; Arlinghaus et al. 2007a, b, 2012b; Cooke and Sneddon 2007; Volpato 2009; Arlinghaus and Schwab 2011). This chapter offers an introduction to recreational K. Ferter (*) · O.-B. Humborstad · J.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMPORTANCE of MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHING in SHANGHAI1 What Is Marine Recreational Fishing?
    IIFET 2014 Australia Conference Proceedings THE IMPORTANCE OF MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHING IN SHANGHAI1 CHEN Ye2 (College of Economies & Management, Shanghai Ocean University) Abstract Recreational fishing, also called sport fishing, is fishing for pleasure or competition. Recreational fishing can advance fisheries technology and benefits related industries. Recreational fishing can also diversify and increase the income of fishermen. Recreational fishing promotes mutual understanding between urban dwellers and fishermen, which is important to “Harmonious Society”. Last but not least, recreational fishing can raise ordinary people’s awareness of the importance of environment protection and territorial waters, which is especially important after China outlined the "maritime power strategy” in 2012. Shanghai, the most modern city in China, is just beside East China Sea (Shanghai means “Upon-the-Sea” in Chinese language). Shanghai is also the birthplace of China’s tourism industry. Shanghainese spent a lot of money on tourism annually. Recreational fishing has the potential to be a big and profitable industry in Shanghai. As people’s income increases, the value of recreational fishing in Shanghai will became more obvious. To order to promote the development of marine recreational fishing, the municipal governance of Shanghai should cooperate with neighboring provinces, set up laws and regulation and promote the development of related industries. Key Words： marine recreational fishing Shanghai What is Marine Recreational Fishing? Recreational fishing, also called sport fisheries, is fishing for pleasure or competition. It can be contrasted with commercial fishing, which is fishing for profit, or subsistence fishing, which is fishing for survival. The most common form of recreational fishing is done with a rod, reel, line, hooks and any one of a wide range of baits.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Pew Fellowship in Marine Conservation Awarded to Dr. Ussif Rashid Sumaila
    2008 Pew Fellowship in Marine Conservation awarded to Dr. Ussif Rashid Sumaila Page 1 of 2 Public release date: 5-Feb-2008 [ Print Article | E-mail Article | Close Window ] Contact: Kathryn Cervino, Communications Manager [email protected] 212-756-0042 University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science 2008 Pew Fellowship in Marine Conservation awarded to Dr. Ussif Rashid Sumaila Dr. Sumalia to Document the Economics of Unsustainable Fishing Globally NEW YORK CITY - Dr. Ussif Rashid Sumaila, an Associate Professor at the University of British Columbia Fisheries Centre in Vancouver, Canada, is among five ocean experts to be awarded the prestigious 2008 Pew Fellowship in Marine Conservation, which supports critical marine conservation projects around the world. Dr. Sumaila will use his fellowship to document the financial factors contributing to unsustainable commercial fishing and depletion of ocean resources around the world. The Pew Institute for Ocean Science administers the three-year, $150,000 awards and today announced the 2008 Fellows, whose innovative projects are urgently needed to improve coral reef health, sustain fisheries, and enhance the effectiveness of marine protected areas. The winners are based in Canada, the United States, China, France and Australia and join more than 100 Pew Fellows in Marine Conservation from 29 countries around the globe (Learn more about the other recipients and their projects at www.pewoceanscience.org). Dr. Sumaila’s prior work has shown that taxpayers worldwide are paying massive subsidies to support overfishing, and has drawn international attention from the media and policymakers. Through his fellowship project on “Global Data on the Economics of Fishing," Dr.
    [Show full text]