Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Faculty Scholarship 2006 Xinfang: An Alternative to Formal Chinese Legal Institutions Carl F. Minzner Fordham University School of Law,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Carl F. Minzner, Xinfang: An Alternative to Formal Chinese Legal Institutions, 42 Stan. J. Int'l L. 103 (2006) Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. XINFANG: AN ALTERNATIVE TO FORMAL CHINESE LEGAL INSTITUTIONS CARL F. MINZNER* I. INTRODUCTION Problems in Faxi village started out small. Residents suspected the local Communist Party secretary of skimming public funds for his own use. Groups of villagers mounted multiple trips to township authorities, requesting the secretary be removed from his post. Gradually, problems spread. After sacking the Party secretary to appease popular sentiment, township authorities attempted to reassert control over local affairs by rigging village committee elections. Villagers, now incensed by a combination of both electoral and financial injustices, began a steady process of petitioning higher levels of government for redress of their grievances. Over the next two years, Faxi petitioners launched petitions and protests directed at a range of township, county, and provincial officials.