DOCSLIB.ORG

Taiwan's Elections: Political Development and Democratization in the Republic of China

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taiwan's Elections: Political Development and Democratization in the Republic of China NUMBER 5 - 1884 (84) TAIWAN'S ELECTIONS: POLITICAL •• DEVELOPMENT MID DEIIOCRAnZATION •• IN THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA John F. Copper, with George P. Chen Sdlael of LAw lWvasiry of ~··~ TAIWAN'S ELECTIONS: POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMOCRATIZATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA John F. Copper, with George P. Chen Occasional Papers/Reprints Series in Contemporary Asian Studies. No. 5-1984(64) Occasional Papers/Reprint Series in Contemporary Asian Studies General Editor: Hungdah Chiu Executive Editor: Mitchell A. Silk Acting Managing Editor: Shaiw-chei Chuang Editorial Advisory Board Professor Robert A. Scalapino, University of California at Berkeley Professor Martin Wilbur, Columbia University Professor Gaston J. Sigur, George Washington University Professor Shao-chuan Leng, University of Virginia Professor Lawrence W. Beer, Lafayette College Professor James Hsiung, New York University Dr. Lih-wu Han, Political Science Association of the Republic of China Professor J. S. Prybyla, The Pennsylvania State University Professor Toshio Sawada, Sophia University, Japan Professor Gottfried-Karl Kindermann, Center for International Politics, University of Munich, Federal Republic of Germany Professor Choon-ho Park, College of Law and East Asian Law of the Sea Institute, Korea University, Republic of Korea Published with the cooperation of the Maryland International Law Society All contributions (in English only) and communications should be sent to Professor Hungdah Chiu, University of Maryland School of Law, 500 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 USA. All publications in this series reflect only the views of the authors. While the editor accepts responsibility for the selection of materials to be published, the individual author is responsible for statements of facts and expressions of opinion contained therein. Subscription is US $15.00 for 6 issues (regardless of the price of individual issues) in the United States and Canada and $20.00 for overseas. Check should be addressed to OPRSCAS and sent to Professor Hungdah Chiu. Price for single copy of this issue: US $5.00 (paperback) $10.00 (hardcover) © 1984 by Occasional Papers/Reprint Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, Inc. ISSN 0730-0107 ISBN 0-942182-65-0 (paperback) ISBN 0-942182-66-9 (hardcover) U.S. Library of Congress Card Catalog No. 84-062053 TAIWAN'S ELECTIONS: POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMOCRATIZATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA John F. Copper, with George P. Chen Table o.f Contents Preface ...................................................... lll Chapter l Introduction ..................................... l Chapter 2 Elections and the Polity of the Republic of China 7 Chapter 3 Internal and External Pressures Evoking Political Participation and Elections . 20 Chapter 4 Elections in Taiwan to 1980. 40 Chapter 5 The 1980 "Watershed" Election.................. 59 Chapter 6 "Local" Elections During 1981 and 1982......... 77 Chapter 7 The 1983 National Election . 93 Chapter 8 Conclusions...................................... 112 English translation of The Public Officials Election and Recall Law, promulgated on May 14, 1980 . 128 Index......................................................... 168 About the Authors . 180 Preface During the 1950s many developing nations sought to adopt democratic systems by following the Western model of political de­ velopment. Almost all of them failed. In the 1960s transplanting democracy to the Third World was still a goal of the West. The experience of Vietnam, however, under­ scored the fact that it did not work very well. In the 1970s and early 1980s there was more realism in the West concerning the appropri­ ateness of "quick fix" means of democratizing the rest of the world. Still there was much emphasis upon human rights, and, with that, political rights and freedoms. Democracy was still a goal and its advocates were usually not patient. During this same period Taiwan institutionalized democracy at a measured pace. Elections were first made a meaningful part of the political process at the local level. Government at all levels was made more responsive to public demands and the needs of economic and social change. As a result, by 1980 the nation was ready for party competition in elections that coincided with expanded political freedoms and an enlarging of the size of the National Assembly and the Legislative branch of the government. The process of democracy "from below" seemed to prove to be the right approach, as did putting economic modernization and social change before democratization. To some extent, however, Taiwan was under pressure to make the system democratic through meaningful elections, even though maintaining stability was considered a sine qua non. The U.S., which had considerable influence over political decisions in the Re­ public of China, wanted democracy. Taiwan also needed to make a favorable impression with the international community in order to defend its right to exist in the face of threats by the People's Repub­ lic of China to "liberate" Taiwan and incorporate the Republic of China's territory. Thus, it had to take risks in terms of speeding up the process of democratization. Taiwan has been a success story in terms of elections, democ­ racy and political development; it is, in fact, a model for other non­ Western nations. Obviously it will be studied more as other nations' leaders and more scholars and observers of events outside their own country realize its significance. This study is only a beginning. More precisely, this work focuses on Taiwan's elections andre- (iii) lV CONTEMPORARY ASIAN STUDIES SERIES lates the election process to political development. It is a process that deserves both attention and analysis not only in the Republic of China but in all developing countries. John F. Copper, with George P. Chen June 1, 1984 TAIWAN'S ELECTIONS: POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMOCRATIZATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA John F. Copper George P. Chen CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION For a number of years many in the West have held great expec­ tations regarding the growth of democracy in China. Some of the reasons for such hopes were valid, some spurious. Clearly, however, democracy was premature. The evolution of democratic institutions in the West took several centuries. Why should China differ? Per­ haps it should take longer. Indeed why should democracy develop in China at all? China was thought to have the makings of a democratic nation because of its so-called democratic culture: little central government; the imper­ ative of good and virtuous government, which restricted the ultimate authority of all political leaders; a class system which was not rigid; government which conducted itself in the name of the people; con­ siderable mass participation in local government; and finally the presence of individualism, free speech, and religious freedom. 1 Added to this, in 1911, China, behind the leadership of Sun Y at-sen, repudiated the ancient imperial system and its autocratic rule and established a republic. And although democracy at that time had its enemies, it was neither repudiated by the masses nor defeated by dictatorial forces or tendencies in subsequent years. Chiang Kai-shek-a Christian, whose wife and frequent spokesman was Western educated, followed in Sun Yat-sen's tradition of de­ mocracy. Chiang was an ally of the West during World War II and knew how to make friends-whom he and China needed. He main­ tained during internal and external crises China's democratic institu­ tions in form if not in practice.2 During World War II China's political system and its political culture were contrasted with Japan's, which were highly undemo- I. For further details on these points, see Lawrence K. Rosinger, China's Crisis (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1945), pp. 3-5 and Creighton Lacy, Is China A De­ mocracy? (New York: John Day Co., 1943), pp. 12-17. 2. Lacy, supra note 1, pp. 73-74. (1) 2 CONTEMPORARY ASIAN STUDIES SERIES cratic, militaristic and authoritarian. Some in fact, saw the antipathy between the two as evidence of their different political traditions and proclivities. China, by contrast, was seen as a bastion of individual­ ism and democracy in Asia. Many in America felt U.S. aid would help realize democracy quickly in China. Others argued that the establishment of demo­ cratic institutions in China was possible to a meaningful degree only when the war ended. But most anticipated that it would be realized. The belief that China was a world power or soon would be and that for this reason it should-or must-be a democracy provided a strong impetus to think that China would democratize. This would solve two problems: China could be fully accepted by the West, and there would be no fear it might disrupt the international system. It also meant that the Communist dictatorship in the Soviet Union would be balanced or offset. In 1949 the West suffered a big disappointment. It even had to search for scapegoats for the fact that Communism won in China over democracy. Chiang Kai-shek and the Nationalists were gener­ ally written off as proponents of authoritarian dictatorship and spe­ cial privilege-not democracy. The Nationalists were labeled corrupt and incompetent. To many the Communists were seen as reformers and by some even as true democrats-though this view did not last long in the West except among the extreme left and a few naive idealists. Informed scholars meanwhile generally admitted that it was premature to think of China, either the People's Republic of China or the Republic of China, as evolving a working democratic system soon. For the next ten years, those that felt that Western influence and a free economy were important, gave the Republic of China some hope, but not much. Seeing attempts at democracy fail throughout the world during the 1950s, the Republic of China on Taiwan was generally categorized as an example of the authorita­ rian-development modeJ.l Whether democracy was to evolve from this kind of system was uncertain. To some it depended upon the further success of economic development.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tatay-Sheng Wang, the Legal Development of Taiwan in the 20Th
    Washington International Law Journal Volume 11 Number 3 6-1-2002 The Legal Development of Taiwan in the 20th Century: Toward a Liberal and Democratic Country Tay-sheng Wang Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Tay-sheng Wang, The Legal Development of Taiwan in the 20th Century: Toward a Liberal and Democratic Country, 11 Pac. Rim L & Pol'y J. 531 (2002). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol11/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington International Law Journal by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright 0 2002 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Associalion THE LEGAL DEVELOPMENT OF TAIWAN IN THE 20TH CENTURY: TOWARD A LIBERAL AND DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY* Tay-sheng Wang I. INTRODbCTION The legal development of Taiwan' in the twentieth century reflects the complex legacy of "one land with two national flags." A government imposed by Japan ruled Taiwan for the first half of the twentieth century (1895-1945), followed by a government originating in China (the Chinese mainland) in the second half of the century (1945-2000). The people who came from Japan or Republican China became the leading class in Taiwan. Accordingly, these two regimes were regarded by the native inhabitants as foreign rulers.2 Taiwan's legal institutions underwent a radical change on the eve of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • No. Area Post Office Name Zip Code Address Telephone No. Same Day
    Zip No. Area Post Office Name Address Telephone No. Same Day Flight Cut Off Time * Code Pingtung Minsheng Rd. Post No. 250, Minsheng Rd., Pingtung 900-41, 1 Pingtung 900 (08)7323-310 (08)7330-222 11:30 Office Taiwan 2 Pingtung Pingtung Tancian Post Office 900 No. 350, Shengli Rd., Pingtung 900-68, Taiwan (08)7665-735 10:00 Pingtung Linsen Rd. Post 3 Pingtung 900 No. 30-5, Linsen Rd., Pingtung 900-47, Taiwan (08)7225-848 10:00 Office No. 3, Taitang St., Yisin Village, Pingtung 900- 4 Pingtung Pingtung Fusing Post Office 900 (08)7520-482 10:00 83, Taiwan Pingtung Beiping Rd. Post 5 Pingtung 900 No. 26, Beiping Rd., Pingtung 900-74, Taiwan (08)7326-608 10:00 Office No. 990, Guangdong Rd., Pingtung 900-66, 6 Pingtung Pingtung Chonglan Post Office 900 (08)7330-072 10:00 Taiwan 7 Pingtung Pingtung Dapu Post Office 900 No. 182-2, Minzu Rd., Pingtung 900-78, Taiwan (08)7326-609 10:00 No. 61-7, Minsheng Rd., Pingtung 900-49, 8 Pingtung Pingtung Gueilai Post Office 900 (08)7224-840 10:00 Taiwan 1 F, No. 57, Bangciou Rd., Pingtung 900-87, 9 Pingtung Pingtung Yong-an Post Office 900 (08)7535-942 10:00 Taiwan 10 Pingtung Pingtung Haifong Post Office 900 No. 36-4, Haifong St., Pingtung, 900-61, Taiwan (08)7367-224 Next-Day-Flight Service ** Pingtung Gongguan Post 11 Pingtung 900 No. 18, Longhua Rd., Pingtung 900-86, Taiwan (08)7522-521 10:00 Office Pingtung Jhongjheng Rd. Post No. 247, Jhongjheng Rd., Pingtung 900-74, 12 Pingtung 900 (08)7327-905 10:00 Office Taiwan Pingtung Guangdong Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 21 Global Taiwan Brief Vol 4
    Global Taiwan Brief Vol. 4, Issue 21 Global Taiwan Brief Vol 4. Issue1 21 Fortnightly Review Russell Hsiao Taiwan and Russia Ties and the China Factor By: I-wei Jennifer Chang A Taiwanese Perspective on the Impact of Hong Kong Protests in Taiwan By: Fang-Yu Chen Taiwan’s International Space: A Tale of Two Speeches By: Michael Mazza Fortnightly Review The Global Taiwan Brief is a By: Russell Hsiao bi-weekly publication released every other Wednesday and pro- Russell Hsiao is the executive director of the Global Taiwan Institute (GTI) and edi- vides insight into the latest news tor-in-chief of the Global Taiwan Brief. on Taiwan. Political Warfare Alert: Is China Using Religious Organizations as Proxies to Funnel Editor-in-Chief Political Donations and Influence in Taiwan? Russell Hsiao In an interview with the magazine Mirror Weekly (鏡週刊), the head of the Chinese Uni- Staff Editor fication Promotion Party (CUPP) (also known as the Unionist Party)—a fringe pro-China Katherine Schultz political party in Taiwan—Chang An-Lo (張安樂 b. 1948) claimed that there are around 30 heads of temples on the island whom are either members of the CUPP or its support- The views and opinions expressed ers. The former triad leader mentioned several of these temples by name. They include in these articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily re- Tainan City Wenheng Temple (文衡殿), Taichung City Shengwu Temple (聖武宮), Chiayi flect the official policy or position 奉天宮 朝天宮 County Fengtian Temple ( ), and Yunlin County Chaotian Temple ( ). Chang of the Global Taiwan Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan Independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Dalei Jie University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Jie, Dalei, "The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 524. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Abstract How to explain the rise and fall of the Taiwan independence policy? As the Taiwan Strait is still the only conceivable scenario where a major power war can break out and Taiwan's words and deeds can significantly affect the prospect of a cross-strait military conflict, ot answer this question is not just a scholarly inquiry. I define the aiwanT independence policy as internal political moves by the Taiwanese government to establish Taiwan as a separate and sovereign political entity on the world stage. Although two existing prevailing explanations--electoral politics and shifting identity--have some merits, they are inadequate to explain policy change over the past twenty years. Instead, I argue that there is strategic rationale for Taiwan to assert a separate sovereignty. Sovereignty assertions are attempts to substitute normative power--the international consensus on the sanctity of sovereignty--for a shortfall in military- economic-diplomatic assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan Open Government Report Introduction 0
    License This report is released under CC-BY-SA 4.0 International-Open Culture Foundation. Its raw data is released under CC0 1.0. Universal. The website is released under MIT license. Report Website Production Team http://opengovreport.ocf.tw/ Author: Mei-chun Lee, Po-yu Tseng Translation: Melissa Chen, John Chen Website and Visualization: Kirby Wu Design: Chofy Lin Publisher: Open Culture Foundation Authors Po-yu Tseng \ Author of Chapter 1 and 3 Mei-chun Lee \ Author of Chapter 2 and 4 Researcher, Open Culture Foundation Researcher, Open Culture Foundation Po-yu is an activist fighting for human rights, Mei-chun is an anthropology PhD candidate gender equality and generational justice. She is also at the University of California, Davis. She also the secretary of the Network of Young Democratic holds a master's degree in anthropology from Asians, an alliance of young activists in Asia working the University of Cambridge. Her research on achieving effective democracy and protection interests include hackitivism, open movements, of human rights. Po-yu was an active participant digital democracy and activism. She is currently of Taiwan's Sunflower Movement in 2014, and conducting fieldwork of civic technology in was a candidate for the Legislative Yuan (Taiwan's Taiwan. At the same time, she is an active Congress) during the 2016 general elections. She participant of the g0v.tw community. also served at the Media Affairs Division of Taipei City Government. Acknowledgement (in alphabetical order) This report was made possible by the generous support of BOST, Chen Chun-Hung, Chen Ling-Jyh, Chen Shun- Ling, ET Blue, Hsu En-en, Hsu Wuu-long, Chuang Miao-tzu, Jyan Hong-Wei, Ju Yu-ren, Lee Yi-Kung, Liu Yu-tin, Lucien Lin, National Development Council, PDIS, Saul Peng, Shaina Wang, Shih Sheng-wen, Taiwan Civil Service Innovation Coalition, TonyQ, Taipei City Government, the LASS community, the g0v community, the jothon organizers, the opendata/tw community, the vTaiwan task force, Tseng I-hsin, Tseng Shu-cheng, Whisky, Watchout, Yu Chihao, and anonymous contributors.
    [Show full text]
  • Culturalism Through Public Art Practices
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research John Jay College of Criminal Justice 2011 Assessing (Multi)culturalism through Public Art Practices Anru Lee CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice Perng-juh Peter Shyong How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/jj_pubs/49 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] 1 How to Cite: Lee, Anru, and Perng-juh Peter Shyong. 2011. “Assessing (Multi)culturalism through Public Art Practices.” In Tak-Wing Ngo and Hong-zen Wang (eds.) Politics of Difference in Taiwan. Pp. 181-207. London and New York: Routledge. 2 Assessing (Multi)culturalism through Public Art Practices Anru Lee and Perng-juh Peter Shyong This chapter investigates the issue of multiculturalism through public art practices in Taiwan. Specifically, we focus on the public art project of the Mass 14Rapid Transit System in Kaohsiung (hereafter, Kaohsiung MRT), and examine how the discourse of multiculturalism intertwines with the discourse of public art that informs the practice of the latter. Multiculturalism in this case is considered as an ideological embodiment of the politics of difference, wherein our main concern is placed on the ways in which different constituencies in Kaohsiung respond to the political-economic ordering of Kaohsiung in post-Second World War Taiwan and to the challenges Kaohsiung City faces in the recent events engendering global economic change. We see the Kaohsiung MRT public art project as a field of contentions and its public artwork as a ‘device of imagination’ and ‘technique of representation’ (see Ngo and Wang in this volume).
    [Show full text]
  • The Presbyterian Church in Taiwan and the Advocacy of Local Autonomy
    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 92 January, 1999 The Presbyterian Church in Taiwan and the Advocacy of Local Autonomy by Christine Louise Lin Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series edited by Victor H. Mair. The purpose of the series is to make available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor actively encourages younger, not yet well established, scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including Romanized Modern Standard Mandarin (MSM) and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino-Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. The only style-sheet we honor is that of consistency. Where possible, we prefer the usages of the Journal of Asian Studies. Sinographs (hanzi, also called tetragraphs [fangkuaizi]) and other unusual symbols should be kept to an absolute minimum. Sino-Platonic Papers emphasizes substance over form.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitional Justice and Judicial Reform in Taiwan
    Washington International Law Journal Volume 28 Number 3 7-1-2019 Whither Converging Narratives of Justice in Transition? Transitional Justice and Judicial Reform in Taiwan Agnes S. Schick-Chen Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Courts Commons Recommended Citation Agnes S. Schick-Chen, Whither Converging Narratives of Justice in Transition? Transitional Justice and Judicial Reform in Taiwan, 28 Wash. L. Rev. 677 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol28/iss3/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington International Law Journal by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Compilation © 2019 Washington International Law Journal Association WHITHER CONVERGING NARRATIVES OF JUSTICE IN TRANSITION? TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AND JUDICIAL REFORM IN TAIWAN1 Agnes S. Schick-Chen2 Abstract: Referring to Taiwan’s recent transitional justice legislation as a first tentative step towards the possibility of judicial solutions for problems of injustice dating from the authoritarian era, this paper elaborates chances and difficulties of introducing the judiciary to the ongoing processes of coming to terms with the past in Taiwan. It intends to argue that apart from the specific circumstances of Taiwan’s transition to democracy after the lifting of martial law in 1987, the avoidance of a judicial approach to transitional justice was both caused by and the reason for a deficit in narratives of judicial justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking Teie: Secrets of Domestk Political Hegemow
    UNLOCKING TEIE: SECRETS OF DOMESTK POLITICAL HEGEMOW. P OLïïICAL SPACE AND ECONOMIC LIBERALIZATION IN TAIWAN AND SOUTH KOREA, 1987-2000 Michael Edward Huenefeld B.A. (Won), University of British Columbia, 1998 THESIS SUBMlTi'ED IN PARTIAL OF THE REQUlREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Political Science OMichael Edward Huenefeld 2000 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY August 2000 Ali rights resewed- This work may not be ceproduceci in whole or part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. This thesis argues tbat, under certain conditions, economic liberalization can strengthen the plitical position of consewative coalitions in transitional democracies. A large body of titerature on the effect of market-opening reforms and democratization posits that economic libedization, by generating social change, cceates new opportunicies for political refonn. This viewpoint, while not unchallenged, appears to be predorninant within academic circles. Through an empirical analysis of two case studies, Taiwan and South Korea, this study contributes a new perspective to the debate over the political effect of economic liberalization. The luialysis of these two countries focuses especially on the impact of market-opening refonn on the electoral- ideological area of pditical lik, an area (termed "political space" by this thesis) to which most existing literaîure seerns to attach only secondary importance (as it focuses ptimarily on institutional dynamics). Taiwan began its democratization process in 1987 with the lifting of marumarualIaw, while the fit rneasures to liberalize the island's economy were implernented in the 1980s. However, as economic and institutional cefonn progressed throughout the 1990s. conservative political elements (represented rnainly by the Kuominrang) have managed to mniatain their dominance over Taiwan's political space.
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School Certification for Approving
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certification for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Stephen Hess Candidate for the Degree: Doctor of Philosophy ____________________________________ Director (Dr. Venelin Ganev) ____________________________________ Reader (Dr. Gulnaz Sharafutdinova) ____________________________________ Reader (Dr. Adeed Dawisha) ____________________________________ Graduate School Representative (Dr. Stanley Toops) ABSTRACT AUTHORITARIAN LANDSCAPES: STATE DECENTRALIZATION, POPULAR MOBILIZATION, AND THE INSTITUTIONAL SOURCES OF RESILIENCE IN NONDEMOCRACIES by Stephen Hess Beginning with the insight that highly-centralized state structures have historically provided a unifying target and fulcrum for the mobilization of contentious nationwide social movements, this dissertation investigates the hypothesis that decentralized state structures in authoritarian regimes impede the development of forms of popular contention sustained and coordinated on a national scale. As defined in this work, in a decentralized state, local officials assume greater discretionary control over public expenditures, authority over the implementation of government policies, and latitude in managing outbreaks of social unrest within their jurisdictions. As a result, they become the direct targets of most protests aimed at the state and the primary mediators of actions directed at third-party, non-state actors. A decentralized state therefore presents not one but a multitude of loci for protests, diminishing claimants‘ ability to use the central state as a unifying target and fulcrum for organizing national contentious movements. For this reason, decentralized autocracies are expected to face more fragmented popular oppositions and exhibit higher levels of durability than their more centralized counterparts. To examine this claim, I conduct four comparative case studies, organized into pairs of autocracies that share a common regime type but vary in terms of state decentralization.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Governance Structures for Performance and Accountability Developments in Australia and Greater China
    DESIGNING GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES FOR PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEVELOPMENTS IN AUSTRALIA AND GREATER CHINA DESIGNING GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES FOR PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEVELOPMENTS IN AUSTRALIA AND GREATER CHINA EDITED BY ANDREW PODGER, TSAI-TSU SU, JOHN WANNA, HON S. CHAN AND MEILI NIU Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463595 ISBN (online): 9781760463601 WorldCat (print): 1162836373 WorldCat (online): 1162821573 DOI: 10.22459/DGSPA.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS Figures . vii Tables . ix Abbreviations and acronyms . xi Contributors . xv 1 . Designing governance structures for performance and accountability: Developments in Australia and greater China . 1 Andrew Podger, Hon S Chan and John Wanna 2 . Theorising public bureaucracies: Comparing organisational purpose, function and form, while counter‑posing political control versus bureaucratic autonomy . 13 John Wanna 3 . How independent should administration be from politics? Theory and practice in public sector institutional design in Australia . 35 Andrew Podger 4 . Governance structure, organisational reform and administrative efficiency: Lessons from Taiwan . 75 Yi‑Huah Jiang 5 . Practical action, theoretical impacts: Aged care and disability services reform in Australia . 97 Mike Woods and David Gilchrist 6 . All the best intentions: A review of a sub‑national attempt at reshaping the not-for-profit/public sector nexus .
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Politics of Taiwan's February 28
    The History and Politics of Taiwan’s February 28 Incident, 1947- 2008 by Yen-Kuang Kuo BA, National Taiwan Univeristy, Taiwan, 1991 BA, University of Victoria, 2007 MA, University of Victoria, 2009 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of History © Yen-Kuang Kuo, 2020 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee The History and Politics of Taiwan’s February 28 Incident, 1947- 2008 by Yen-Kuang Kuo BA, National Taiwan Univeristy, Taiwan, 1991 BA, University of Victoria, 2007 MA, University of Victoria, 2009 Supervisory Committee Dr. Zhongping Chen, Supervisor Department of History Dr. Gregory Blue, Departmental Member Department of History Dr. John Price, Departmental Member Department of History Dr. Andrew Marton, Outside Member Department of Pacific and Asian Studies iii Abstract Taiwan’s February 28 Incident happened in 1947 as a set of popular protests against the postwar policies of the Nationalist Party, and it then sparked militant actions and political struggles of Taiwanese but ended with military suppression and political persecution by the Nanjing government. The Nationalist Party first defined the Incident as a rebellion by pro-Japanese forces and communist saboteurs. As the enemy of the Nationalist Party in China’s Civil War (1946-1949), the Chinese Communist Party initially interpreted the Incident as a Taiwanese fight for political autonomy in the party’s wartime propaganda, and then reinterpreted the event as an anti-Nationalist uprising under its own leadership.
    [Show full text]