Genie Energy Ltd. 2013 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genie Energy Ltd. 2013 Annual Report GENIE ENERGY LTD. 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Dear Fellow Genie Energy Stockholders: I write these words as Genie’s new CEO, having assumed that responsibility at the beginning of the year. Please join me in thanking Claude Pupkin for his able stewardship of our company during the challenging period of our separation from IDT and formation as a separate public company. This year, we will embark on an important new phase at Genie Energy. The time was right for me to dedicate more of my time to assist our capable management team and help realize Genie Energy’s value. As early as this summer, our Afek subsidiary in Israel intends to begin an exploratory drilling program to evaluate a potential oil and gas resource we identified in Northern Israel. The available evidence to date, including the results of our aboveground geological tests, has been consistent with our thesis that there may be a significant oil and gas deposit in the license area. We intend to validate our thesis through an extensive exploratory drilling program beginning later this year. If we determine that the resource is commercially viable, we will declare a discovery under Israeli law and seek a commercial production license. Because this resource would likely be suited to development through commercially available technologies, we anticipate that the timeline to commercial production would be significantly shorter than those of our oil shale projects in Israel, Colorado and Mongolia. Our three oil shale projects are making progress toward pilot test operations. Although each has unique regulatory or technical challenges, the underlying fundamentals remain compelling. That is why oil shale development is attracting a torrent of new investment around the world – from Jordan to Brazil to China -- and is receiving renewed interest from the majors. In our case, successful pilot tests would move us significantly closer to unlocking access to tens of billions of barrels of oil equivalent in place. Genie Energy marries these exciting early stage development projects with a dynamic retail energy provider business. Our retail energy business performed well again in 2013, generating over $25 million in EBITDA. As additional states deregulate their retail energy markets, IDT Energy will look to further expand its geographic footprint in states meeting our criteria, even as we seek to deepen our market penetration in the five states and the District of Colombia where we already operate. In that regard, late last year we purchased a platform for network marketing and energy brokerage services, and we expect them to begin onboarding customers later this year and eventually to become significant drivers of long term growth. Overall, I am very pleased by how much Genie has accomplished in an extremely short time. We first entered the retail energy business in late 2004 and did not begin oil shale development until 2008. Today, our retail energy business is one of the largest independent providers in our region, and the E&P side of our business is pursuing projects with tremendous upside potential around the world while it develops proprietary oil shale development technologies. While this is an impressive record of accomplishment, our best days are still ahead of us. I congratulate you for being on board, and look forward to working with you to realize the potential of Genie Energy. Sincerely, Howard S. Jonas Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ; Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, or Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Commission File Number: 1-35327 Genie Energy Ltd. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 45-2069276 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) or organization) 550 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102 (Address of principal executive offices, zip code) (973) 438-3500 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Class B common stock, par value $.01 per share New York Stock Exchange Series 2012-A Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No ; Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No ; Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ; No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ; No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ; Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b- 2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer ; Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No ; The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price on June 28, 2013 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) of the Class B common stock of $9.15 per share, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was approximately $145 million. As of March 10, 2014, the registrant had outstanding 19,765,182 shares of Class B common stock and 1,574,326 shares of Class A common stock. Excluded from these numbers are 58,978 shares of Class B common stock held in treasury by Genie Energy Ltd. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE The definitive proxy statement relating to the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be held May 7, 2014, is incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K to the extent described therein. Index Genie Energy Ltd. Annual Report on Form 10-K Part I ............................................................................................. 1 Item 1. Business. ............................................................................. 1 Item 1A. Risk Factors........................................................................... 13 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments. ........................................................... 21 Item 2. Properties. ............................................................................ 21 Item 3. Legal Proceedings. .................................................................... 21 Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures................................................................ 22 Part II ............................................................................................ 22 Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. ................................................................. 22 Item 6. Selected Financial Data. ............................................................... 25 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations... 26 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks. ............................. 50 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. .......................................... 51 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. .. 51 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures................................................................ 51 Item 9B. Other Information. .................................................................... 53 Part III ........................................................................................... 53 Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.................................. 53 Item 11. Executive Compensation. .............................................................. 54 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. ............................................................................ 54 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. ............... 54 Item 14. Principal
Recommended publications
  • Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources ______Profiles of Companies Engaged in Domestic Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource and Technology Development
    5th Edition Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources ______________________________________________________________________________ Profiles of Companies Engaged in Domestic Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource and Technology Development Prepared by INTEK, Inc. For the U.S. Department of Energy • Office of Petroleum Reserves Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Fifth Edition: September 2011 Note to Readers Regarding the Revised Edition (September 2011) This report was originally prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy in June 2007. The report and its contents have since been revised and updated to reflect changes and progress that have occurred in the domestic oil shale and tar sands industries since the first release and to include profiles of additional companies engaged in oil shale and tar sands resource and technology development. Each of the companies profiled in the original report has been extended the opportunity to update its profile to reflect progress, current activities and future plans. Acknowledgements This report was prepared by INTEK, Inc. for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Petroleum Reserves, Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves (DOE/NPOSR) as a part of the AOC Petroleum Support Services, LLC (AOC- PSS) Contract Number DE-FE0000175 (Task 30). Mr. Khosrow Biglarbigi of INTEK, Inc. served as the Project Manager. AOC-PSS and INTEK, Inc. wish to acknowledge the efforts of representatives of the companies that provided information, drafted revised or reviewed company profiles, or addressed technical issues associated with their companies, technologies, and project efforts. Special recognition is also due to those who directly performed the work on this report. Mr. Peter M. Crawford, Director at INTEK, Inc., served as the principal author of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Shale Tracing Federal Support for Oil Shale Development in the U.S
    SUBSIDIZING OIL SHALE TRACING FEDERAL SUPPORT FOR OIL SHALE DEVELOPMENT IN THE U.S. www.taxpayer.net OIL SHALE SPECIMEN. Image Courtesy of United States Geological Survey OIL SHALE SPECIMEN. Image Courtesy of United States Geological Survey lthough the oil shale industry is still in reserves were created to ensure a military oil supply. its commercial infancy, it has a long his- In response, the Bureau of Mines program began A tory of government support that continues research into exploiting oil shale technology and in today. The Bureau of Land Management recently the 1960s private industry followed. But significant issued two new research, development and demon- action was limited until the 1970s, when in response stration leases and new federal regulations for com- to the gas shortages Congress intervened in oil shale mercial leases and royalty rates are expected any day. development, in hopes of creating a domestic fuel Before the federal government goes down that road alternative. Their unsuccessful attempt to spur large- it’s important to take a look back and ask whether we scale commercial development of oil shale and other should be throwing good money after bad. unconventional fossil fuels became a notorious waste Oil shale, or kerogen shale, is a sedimentary rock of federal funds. that contains liquid hydrocarbons that are released Since then federal support has continued in vari- when heated. Considered an oil precursor, kerogen ous forms. Although not a key part of the overall is fossil organic matter that has not had exposure energy policy agenda, federal subsidies continue to to high enough temperatures or been in the ground appear in legislation and administrative actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Development Water Needs Assessment Update PHASE III FINAL REPORT
    Submitted to: Colorado and Yampa‐White‐Green Basin Roundtables Energy Development Water Needs Assessment Update PHASE III FINAL REPORT Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure 1002 Walnut Street, Suite 200 Boulder, Colorado 80302 and Canyon Water Resources, LLC 685 Canyon Creek Drive Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 June 30, 2014 ENERGY DEVELOPMENT WATER NEEDS ASSESSMENT UPDATE Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 THE WATER SUPPLY PLANNING PROCESS ......................................................................................... 2 2.1 Basin Roundtables ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Interbasin Compact Committee .................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Basin Implementation Plans (BIP) ................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Energy Water Needs Assessments ................................................................................................ 3 2.4.1 Overview of Phase I Study .................................................................................................... 3 2.4.2 Overview of the Phase II Energy Development Water Needs Study .................................... 7 3.0 COMMERCIAL OIL SHALE WATER DEMANDS .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genie Energy Ltd. 2016 Annual Report
    GENIE ENERGY LTD. 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Fellow Stockholders, Throughout 2016, Genie made signifi cant investments in growth opportunities and took additional steps to improve its strategic position for 2017 and beyond. We are now well situated to reap the benefi ts of these decisions as we continue to execute on our growth strategies. Genie Retail Energy captured robust margins and implemented operating effi ciencies to achieve strong bottom line growth during the past year. In the fourth quarter, we closed on the acquisition of Town Square Energy which signifi cantly expanded our geographic reach, added to our meter and RCE bases, and provided us with additional marketing savvy through new meter acquisition channels. As a result of the acquisition, Genie Retail is poised to further expand its meter base and deliver strong bottom-line results. Looking ahead, the retail energy space presents additional expansion opportunities. Here in the US, we are working to enter additional deregulated markets while scouting for additional acquisition opportunities. Globally, competitive energy supply is also a signifi cant growth sector. We are closely monitoring developments in several overseas markets to identify opportunities that meet our expansion criteria. Genie Retail Energy also made signifi cant progress to address legal and regulatory challenges. We enter 2017 with signifi cantly less uncertainty in those areas compared to the year ago. At GOGAS, we have narrowed our operational focus to our Afek exploratory oil project in Northern Israel, suspending operations at other units and decommissioning our AMSO oil shale project in Colorado. Afek has drilled fi ve wells in the southern portion of its license area and completed well fl ow tests on two of those wells.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Wind Energy Industry in the Occupied Syrian Golan
    Flash Report Greenwashing the Golan: The Israeli Wind Energy Industry in the Occupied Syrian Golan March 2019 Introduction 2 Methodology 2 The Israeli Wind Energy Industry 2 Targeting the Syrian Golan for Wind Farm Construction 3 About the Occupied Syrian Golan 5 Commercial Wind Farms in the Syrian Golan 6 Al-A’saniya Wind Farm 6 Valley of Tears (Emek Habacha) Wind Farm 7 Ruach Beresheet Wind Farm 10 Clean Wind Energy (ARAN) Wind Farm 10 Conclusion 12 Annex I: Aveeram Ltd. company response 13 Introduction For each farm we expose the involvement of international and Israeli companies which Though neither sun nor wind are finite re- include, Enlight Renewable Energy, Energix sources, their exploitation for electricity gen- Group and General Electric, among others. eration is not without material constraints. Green energy requires favorable geographic The report argues that the emergence of this conditions and extensive swathes of land. sector is a case of greenwashing: while touted In the Israeli context, the emergence of the as the “green solution” to Israel’s national en- green energy industry over the past decade, ergy requirements, the growth of this indus- has been inextricably tied to Israeli control try in the occupied Golan is in fact an inherent over Palestinian and Syrian land. part of the expansion of Israel’s control and presence in the Syrian Golan. Previous research by Who Profits demon- strated the centrality of Palestinian land to Methodology the development of Israeli solar energy.1 We This flash report is based on both desk and revealed that the Jordan Valley in the oc- field research.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied Investment Management (AIM) Program
    Applied Investment Management (AIM) Program AIM Class of 2013 Equity Fund Reports Spring 2013 Date: January 25th | Time: 3-5 p.m. | Location: AIM Research Room (488) Join us in person, or considering joining us live at: Connect to the LIVE meeting via Blackboard web-based conferencing tool Student Presenter Company Name Ticker Price Page No. Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Varun Varma BLX $22.57 2 Exterior SA Margaret Wanner Female Health Company FHCO $7.60 5 Sam Sladky Foster Wheeler AG FWLT $24.50 8 Nick Hartnell Genie Energy Ltd. GNE $7.44 11 Brandon Byrne Haynes International, Inc. HAYN $50.02 14 Kevin Kroeger Hibbett Sports Inc. HIBB $54.55 17 Michael Schwoerer SK Telecom SKM $17.01 20 These student presentations are an important element of the applied learning experience in the AIM program. The students conduct fundamental equity research and present their recommendations in written and oral format – with the goal of adding their stock to the AIM Equity Fund. Your comments and advice add considerably to their educational experience and is greatly appreciated. Each student will spend about 5-7 minutes presenting their formal recommendation, which is then followed by about 8-10 minutes of Q & A. For more information about AIM please contact: David S. Krause, PhD Director, Applied Investment Management Program Marquette University College of Business Administration, Department of Finance 436 Straz Hall, PO Box 1881 Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881 mailto: [email protected] Website: MarquetteBuz/AIM AIM Blog: AIM Program Blog Twitter: Marquette AIM Facebook: Marquette AIM Marquette University AIM Class 2013 Equity Reports Spring 2013 Page 1 Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior SA (BLX) January 25, 2013 Varun Varma International Financial Services Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior SA (NYSE:BLX), known as Bladex, is a supranational bank originally established by the Central Banks of Latin America (LatAm) and Caribbean countries to promote trade finance in the Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Unconventional Energy Resources: 2013 Review
    Unconventional Energy Resources: 2013 Review American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Energy Minerals Division Natural Resources Research formerly `Nonrenewable Resources' ISSN 1520-7439 Volume 23 Number 1 Nat Resour Res (2014) 23:19-98 DOI 10.1007/s11053-013-9224-6 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by International Association for Mathematical Geosciences (outside the USA). This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Natural Resources Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, March 2014 (Ó 2013) DOI: 10.1007/s11053-013-9224-6 Unconventional Energy Resources: 2013 Review American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Energy Minerals Division1,2 Received 23 July 2013; accepted 17 September 2013 Published online: 30 November 2013 This report contains nine unconventional energy resource commodity summaries and an analysis of energy economics prepared by committees of the Energy Minerals Division of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Unconventional energy resources, as used in this report, are those energy resources that do not occur in discrete oil or gas reservoirs held in structural or stratigraphic traps in sedimentary basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Genie Energy Ltd (NYSE: GNE, GNEPRA)
    Genie Energy Ltd (NYSE: GNE, GNEPRA) Investor Presentation August 2014 Safe Harbor Statement This presentation contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements and such forward-looking statements are statements made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include: • statements about Genie’s and its divisions’ future performance; • projections of Genie’s and its divisions’ results of operations or financial condition; • statements regarding Genie’s plans, objectives or goals, including those relating to its strategies, initiatives, competition, acquisitions, dispositions and/or its products; and • expectations concerning the permitting, timing and development of Genie’s shale oil projects. Words such as "believe," "anticipate," "plan," "expect," "intend," "target," "estimate," "project," "predict," "forecast," "guideline," "aim," "will," "should," “likely,” "continue" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward- looking statements and all such forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the following cautionary statements. Forward-looking statements are based on Genie’s current expectations, estimates and assumptions and because forward- looking statements address future results, events and conditions, they, by their very nature, involve inherent risks and uncertainties, many of which are unforeseeable and beyond the Genie’s control. Such known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause Genie’s actual results, performance or other achievements to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed, projected or implied by these forward-looking statements.
    [Show full text]
  • IDT Corporation
    IDT Corporation 2010 Annual Report Dear Fellow Stockholders: I have always thought of IDT as an engine of innovation, and in particular, as a vehicle to research, incubate and deploy game-changing technologies to benefit American consumers. Over our 20-year history, this approach has led to some remarkable successes: • When IDT pioneered the automated international call re-origination service, we attacked the highly regulated model of international telecommunications and opened that market to retail competition. The result – consumers benefitted from drastically lower international dialing costs. • Our Net2Phone subsidiary pioneered VoIP, and today, internet based telephony is ubiquitous. Once again, traditional pricing models were upended and consumers have reaped the benefits. Likewise, our oil shale initiatives in Western Colorado and Israel fit this model for innovation. Shale oil is a magnifi- cent, virtually untapped resource. Its development will substantially increase the long term supply of petroleum-based fuels, moderate liquid fuel prices for consumers, reduce price volatility, and enhance energy security for America and its allies. Oil shale is not the only area where IDT is developing disruptive technologies. Fabrix, an innovative technology venture, has pioneered a software platform for next generation television services. Its sophisticated cloud based DVR solution is currently being deployed by its first customer, a large cable operator. Zedge, our platform for the sharing and discovery of mobile content, continues to roll out exciting new features that are driving strong growth in its global user community. For all the promise of these initiatives, we remain focused on our core businesses – IDT Telecom and IDT Energy. The strong performances delivered by both these businesses in fiscal 2010 provided IDT with $48 million in free cash flow even as we continued to invest modestly in our high growth potential initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Plans and Progress on US Bureau of Land Management Oil Shale RD&D Leases in the United States Peter M
    Assessment of Plans and Progress on US Bureau of Land Management Oil Shale RD&D Leases in the United States Peter M. Crawford, Christopher Dean, and Jeffrey Stone, INTEK, Inc. James C. Killen, US Department of Energy Purpose This paper describes the original plans, progress and accomplishments, and future plans for nine oil shale research, development and demonstration (RD&D) projects on six existing RD&D leases awarded in 2006 and 2007 by the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to Shell, Chevron, EGL (now AMSO), and OSEC (now Enefit American, respectively); as well as three pending leases to Exxon, Natural Soda, and AuraSource, that were offered in 2010. The outcomes associated with these projects are expected to have global applicability. I. Background The United States is endowed with more than 6 trillion barrels of oil shale resources, of which between 800 billion and 1.4 trillion barrels of resources, primarily in Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah may be recoverable using known and emerging technologies. (Figure 11) These resources represent the largest and most concentrated oil shale resources in the world. More than 75 percent of these resources are located on Federal lands managed by the Department of the Interior. BLM is responsible for making land use decisions and managing exploration of energy and mineral resource on Federal lands. In 2003, rising oil prices and increasing concerns about the economic costs and security of oil imports gave rise to a BLM oil shale research, development and demonstration (RD&D) program on lands managed by BLM in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • EMD Oil Shale Committee
    EMD Oil Shale Committee 2016 EMD Oil Shale Committee Final Report Alan K. Burnham (Chair), Stanford University May 18, 2016 Vice-Chairs: Dr. Mariela Araujo (Vice-Chair: Industry), Shell International Exploration and Production Dr. Lauren Birgenheier (Vice-Chair: University), University of Utah Dr. Justin E. Birdwell (Vice-Chair: Government), U.S. Geological Survey Advisory Group: Dr. Jeremy Boak, Oklahoma Geological Survey, University of Oklahoma Mr. Ronald C. Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey Special Consultants to the Committee: Robert Kleinberg, Schlumberger-Doll Research Steven Kerr, Millcreek Mining Group Jaanus Purga, Viru Keemia Grupp (VKG) Rikki Hrenko-Browning, Enefit American Oil Indrek Aarna, Eesti Energia Steven Odut, Thyssenkrupp Gary Aho, Sage Geotech Pierre Allix, Total S.A. John Parsons, QER Pty Ltd Gerald Daub, Daub & Associates, Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Progress on oil shale continued around the world, although many projects have been cancelled recently due to low oil prices. New production capacity was in full force in Estonia and China, and plans for production moved forward in Jordan and Utah, although at a slower pace than expected a few years ago. Some companies are re-optimizing their processes and projects to adapt to the current economic situation. The current status is still in flux, and it is too early to know whether we are seeing a repeat of the 1980s or a shorter-term correction. Oil shale continues to be mined and retorted or burned in power plants in Estonia, China and Brazil. Production rose significantly in 2015, but future expansion is uncertain. In Estonia, Viru Keemia Grupp brought a second Petroter plant on line in Q3 of 2014 and a third unit in the Q3 of 2015, 1 bringing their total installed capacity to ~14,000 BOPD (barrels of oil per day).
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    IDT Corporation 2009 Annual Report Dear Fellow Stockholders: Approximately one year ago, IDT intensified execution of its turnaround program. A key objective was to narrow our scope of business to two core sectors – telecommunications and energy. As a result, we shed an array of non-core businesses and vastly improved our operational performance during fiscal 2009. Although IDT is a leaner, more focused company today, we remain committed to the prudent pursuit of bold ideas that can transform industries if not the world. There is no better example of this than our investment in American Shale Oil, LLC (AMSO), a joint venture with Total S.A., to research and commercialize shale oil production on federal land in Colorado. The economic and strategic rationales for domestic oil shale development are compelling: • The United States owns the world’s richest oil shale deposits; • Oil prices are already recovering rapidly as the global economy recovers; • Technologies to extract and process shale oil in an economical and environmentally sound manner are evolving rapidly; and • Shale oil production could significantly lessen America’s dependence on foreign oil. Because of these factors, I expect that commercial shale oil production will gradually become a key component of U.S. energy policy, and AMSO will become a key player in the oil shale industry. AMSO is one example of the strategically targeted growth opportunities in energy and telecommunications that IDT will pursue consistent with our financial condition and tolerance for risk. Moving forward, I will be more deeply involved in the day to day operations of IDT. My good friend and IDT’s long time CEO, Jim Courter, retired from that position in October, and I have since assumed the CEO role.
    [Show full text]