DOCSLIB.ORG

LOCAL POTTERY of the PERSIAN PERIOD Ephraim Stern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LOCAL POTTERY of the PERSIAN PERIOD Ephraim Stern CHAPTER TWO LOCAL POTTERY OF THE PERSIAN PERIOD Ephraim Stern INTRODUCTION The following typological discussion differs from our pre­ vious summary in two respects. The imported East Greek A surprisingly meager quantity of local pottery of the Per­ and Attic vessels have been omitted and are dealt with in sian period was discovered in Areas A and C of Tel Dor. Still separate chapters (see below, Chapters 3-4). We have there­ more surprising was the lack of diversity in the ceramic rep­ fore also excluded all the undecorated vessels of Greek ertoire, even if we take into account the relatively small origin, such as wine jars and amphorae, which were dealt extent of the excavated areas. The low reliability of conclu­ with in the 1982 study. We have, however, included those sions drawn from such sparse finds can be demonstrated by vessels which we consider to have been of foreign origin - our excavations. Almost all the types absent from Areas A in our view Rhodian, but in the opinion of other scholars and C were encountered in the other excavated areas: B, D, Cypriot - but in the course oftime were absorbed into the E, F, and G. It therefore appears that the ceramic repertoire local repertoire and were locally produced in great quanti­ of Areas A and Cis a result of chance, or perhaps of the lim­ ties. Such vessels include the well-known 'Persian bowls' and ited size of the excavated area or its special character of small 'basket jars.' units of residential buildings. Our discussion of the pottery will proceed in the usual Generally speaking, none of the pottery vessels found in order, beginning with the open vessels and continuing with these areas can be considered new types; all belong to types the closed. In addition to the typological discussion, the dealt with by the present writer in 1982 in his typological reader will find at the end of the chapter the material from discussion of the pottery of the Persian period (Stern 1982). selected loci arranged by area and phase, in which the other For this reason the present discussion will follow the outlines finds are presented together with the pottery. This presenta­ of the previous study. tion also illustrates the gradual development of the pottery Since the publication of the above-mentioned study, from phase to phase which was noted in the field. many more large-scale excavations have been conducted and their material published, including a number from the BOWLS (Fig. 2.1) area of Dor. Since this material did not appear in the 1982 publication, we have taken the opportunity to include their It is already evident that ordinary bowls are very poorly rep­ results here and to discuss their contribution to pottery resented at Dor, both in number and in variety of types. We typology in general. The newly excavated sites in the vicinity have already noted a similar phenomenon at the neighbor­ ofTel Dorwhose finds will be discussed here are Tell Keisan, ing Tel Mevorakh (Stern 1978: 30); this is also the case at the Yoqne'am, Tell Qiri, Tel Michal, Qadum, and Shechem. recent excavations at Tell Qiri (Ben-Tor and Portugali 1987: It can be stated with confidence that our study of 1982 is 18) and to an even more marked degree at Tel Michal still valid and that, with the exception of a number of new (Herzog 1989: 139). types unknown at that time, all our conclusions regarding The reason is difficult to determine. In the final report of typology and chronology have proved correct. Moreover, the Tel Mevorakh excavations, we offered the following the new finds from recent excavations, including those of explanation: 'The sparsity of the bowl types seems to stem Dor, have in fact strengthened our previous conclusions. from the fact that all the Persian vessels at the site belong to Our observations as to the regional character of several of the later part of the period' (Stern 1978: 30). Their absence the ceramic types have also withstood the test oftime, and at Dor, however, cannot be similarly explained. It is possible some of them have been finally proven. that the difficulty is a technical one, namely that we did not We shall mention here only two examples. The Phoeni­ succeed in collecting all the small sherds of these bowls and cian jars ofType F, which were attributed to the Sharon and thus could not estimate their numbers accurately. Alterna­ Carmel coast, were uncovered at Tel Michal in a kiln in the tively, the reason may be connected with the coastal or process of manufacture (Stern 1982: 104-105, Fig. 142; regional location of the site. Whatever the case may be, as at Herzog 1989: 102-103, Fig. 8.14, Pis. 30, 63: 1-5). The other Tel Mevorakh, four classes of bowls can be distinguished: example is that of jugs of Type H which were attributed to A. Large and small bowls with rounded walls and the same region (Stern 1982: 117, Fig. 172); though these inverted rims (Fig. 2.1:1-2, 8). were found in large concentrations at Qadum near Samaria, B. Large and small bowls with ledge rims (Fig.2.1 :3-5). they also occur at Dor and Tel Michal, but are completely C. Large and small bowls with rounded walls (Fig. 2.1 :7). absent from other regions. D. Carinated bowls (Fig. 2.1 :9). 51 I 7 2 ~17 3 4 5 6 I \~ J 8 7 9 0 5 10 15CM Fig. 2.1. Bowls. No. Reg. No. Locus Area Phase Description I. 46627/2 4668 C2 6b Light red clay (2.5YR 6/8). Large and small white and shiny grit~ 2. 11823111 !227 AI 7 Red-brown clay (2.5YR 5/6). Many white grits. 3. 1189711 1237 AI 7/8 Red-brown clay (2.5YR 5/6). White and gray grits. 4. 11897/2 1237 AI 7/8 Red-brown clay (2.5YR 5/6). Many minute white grits. 5. 11956/1 1242 AI 7/9 Yellowish red clay (5YR 5/8). White and gray grits. 6. 43065/2 4301 Cl 5 +topsoil Light red clay (2.5YR 6/8). Many minute white grits. 7. 43065/1 4301 Cl 5 +topsoil Reddish yellow clay (7.5YR 8/6). Smooth white surface. Very fe, 8. 11650 1197 AI 6a?/5c? white grits. 9. 11694/4 1206 AI 6(b'!/c?) Brownish yellow clay (I OYR 6/6). Many white and gray grits. This classification is also valid for the finds at Tel Dor, Qiri and Tell Keisan (Ben-Tor and Portugali 1987: 18, Fig with the addition of Type E, a new type which may be a local 2:24-25; Briend and Humbert 1980: Pl. 20:22), as well as a imitation of the Attic fish plate (Fig. 2.1 :6). Yoqne'am (Ben-Tor eta/. !983: 45, Fig. 8:5); it dates fron the 5th-4th centuries BCE. Type A TypeC Flat bowl with disk base, rounded wall, and inverted rim (Fig. 2.1: l-2) (Stern 1982: 95-96, Fig. 118, Type B l; Stern Bowl with high to low disk base, rounded wall, and rounc and Magen 1984: 116, Fig. 5: I). This type was common in upright rim (Fig. 2.1 :7) (Stern 1982: Type A2). It dates fron all parts of the country throughout the Persian period. Our the 5th-4th centuries BCE, and was also found at Yoqne'an examples come from the earlier part of the period. (Ben-Tor eta/. 1983: 45, Fig. 8:6). Fig. 2.1:8 is a small bowl with high to low disk base, rounded wall, and sharply inverted rim (Stern 1982: 94, Fig. TypeD 112, Type AI). Examples have also been uncovered in the new excavations at Tell Qiri (Ben-Tor and Portugali 1987: Bowl of a well-known type, whose characteristic feature is ' 18, Fig. 2:23), Tell Keisan (Briend and Humbert !980: Pl. fairly sharp carination of the wall (Fig. 2.1 :9). The bow 20:6), Tel Michal (Herzog 1989: 141, Fig. 9.16.4), and appears in a wide range of variations in the base, which i' Yoqne'am (Ben-Tor et a/. 1983: 45, Fig. 8.4). The bowl sometimes convex (as in our case) and sometimes flat or' resembles its larger predecessor, but most examples occur in concave disk. Parallels from other sites indicate that it wa' contexts dating from the mid-5th to the end of the 4th cen­ widely distributed throughout Palestine during the entin turies BCE. The smaller type is undoubtedly a copy of an Persian period (Stern 1982: 95, Fig. 116, Type A-5). Thi' Attic prototype. bowl is well represented at Qadum, where it is ascribed tc the second half of the 5th century BCE (Stern and Mager 1984: 16, Fig. 5:4-7), and at Tell Qiri (Ben-Tor anc TypeB Portugali !987: 18, Fig. 2:26), where it is dated to the sam( Bowl with ledge rim (Fig. 2.1 :3-5) (Stern 1982: 94, Fig. 14, period. Our bowl comes from Area AI, phase 6, which i' Type A3). It is also found in the recent excavations at Tell attributed to the 4th century BCE. 52 TypeE Beersheba, Arad, and 'En Gedi (Aharoni and Aharoni 197 6). It is now also certain that most of these early vessels 'his type (Fig. 2. I :6) is clearly an imitation of the Attic fish are either East Greek imports (in the opinion of the present late, which is usually considered to belong to the Hellenistic writer) or Cypriot (according to other scholars).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adan-Bayewitz, David. "On the Chronology of the Common Pottery of the Northern Roman Judaea/Palestine." One Land - Many Cultures
    Adan-Bayewitz, David. "On the Chronology of the Common Pottery of the Northern Roman Judaea/Palestine." One Land - Many Cultures. Archaeological Studies in Honour of S. Loffreda. Eds. Giovanni Claudio Bottini, Leah Di Segni and Lesław Daniel Chrupcala. Jerusalem: Franciscan Printing Press, 2003. 5-32. Adan-Bayewitz, David, Frank Asaro, Moshe Wiedner, and Robert D. Giauque. "Preferential Distribution of Lamps from the Jerusalem Area in the Late Second Temple Period (Late First Century B.C.E. - 70 C.E.)." Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 350 (2008): 37-85. Albert, Rosa Maria, Ruth Shahack-Gross, Dan Cabanes, Ayelet Gilboa, Simcha Lev-Yadun, Marta Portillo, Ilan Sharon, Elisabetta Boaretto, and Steve Weiner. "Phytolith-Rich Layers from the Late Bronze and Iron Ages at Tel Dor (Israel): Mode of Formation and Archaeological Significance." Journal of Archaeological Science 35.1 (2007): 57-75. Ariel, Donald T., Ilan Sharon, Jan. Gunneweg, and Isidore Perlman. "A Group of Stamped Hellenistic Storage Jar Handles from Dor." Israel Exploration Journal 35 (1985): 135-52. Avigad, Nahman. "The Priest of Dor." Israel Exploration Journal 25 (1975): 101-05. ---. "A Hebrew Seal Depicting a Sailing Ship." Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 246 (1982): 59-62. ---. "The Ship of Oniyahu - A Hebrew Seal Depicting a Sailing Vessel." Qadmoniot 16 (1983): 124-26. Ayalon, Y., ed. The Coast of Dor, Society for the Protection of Nature. 1988. Baines, John. "On Wenamun as a Literary Text." Literatur und Politik im pharaonischen und ptolemäischen Ägypten: Vorträge der Tagung zum Gedenken an Georges Posener 5.-10. September 1996 in Leipzig.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaffa's Ancient Inland Harbor: Historical, Cartographic, and Geomorphological Data ������������������������� 89 Aaron A
    c hapter 4 Jaffa’s ancient inland harbor: historical,cartographic, and geomorphological data a aron a. burke,1 shelley wachsmann,2 simona avnaim-katav,3 richard k. dunn,4 krister kowalski,5 george a. pierce,6 and martin peilstöcker7 1UniversityofCalifornia,Los Angeles; 2Te xasA&M; 3UniversityofCalifornia, LosAngeles; 4Norwich University; 5Johannes GutenbergUniversity; 6BrighamYoung University; 7Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Thecontext created by recent studies of thegeomorphologyofLevantine harborsand renewedarchaeologicalresearchinthe Late Bronze AgelevelsofTel Yafo (Jaffa) by theJaffa Cultural Heritage Projecthaveled to efforts to identifythe location of apossible inland Bronze andIronAge harbor at Jaffa, Israel.Althoughseveral scholarsduring thetwentieth centuryspeculatedabout theexistenceand location of an ancient inlandharbor, theextent of theproxy data in supportofits identification hasnever been fullyassessed. Nonetheless, a range of historical, cartographic, arthistorical,topographical, andgeomorphologicaldata can be summoned thatpoint to theexistenceofabodyofwater thatlay to theeastofthe settle- ment andmound of ancient Jaffa. This feature is likely avestige of Jaffa’searliestanchorage or harbor andprobablywentout of usebythe startofthe Hellenisticperiod. slongasbiblicalscholars, archaeologists, always directly relatedtoits declineasaport(see historians,and geographershaveconcerned historicaloverviews in Peilstöcker andBurke 2011). athemselves with Jaffa, itsidentityhas revolved Jaffa’seclipse by anotherportisfirstattestedwiththe
    [Show full text]
  • Members' Magazine
    oi.uchicago.edu News & Notes MEMBERS’ MAGAZINE ISSUE 241 | SPRING 2019 | TRAVEL oi.uchicago.edu THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE 1155 East 58th Street Chicago, IL, 60637 WEBSITE oi.uchicago.edu FACSIMILE 773.702.9853 MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION 773.702.9513 [email protected] MUSEUM INFORMATION 773.702.9520 SUQ GIFT AND BOOK SHOP 773.702.9510 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 773.702.9514 [email protected] MUSEUM GALLERY HOURS Mon: Closed Sun–Tue, Thu–Sat: 10am–5pm Wed: 10am–8pm CREDITS Editors: Matt Welton, Charissa Johnson, Rebecca Cain, Steve Townshend, & Tasha Vorderstrasse Designers: Rebecca Cain, Matt Welton, & Charissa Johnson Additional photos: Judith R. Kolar, Sara Jean Lindholm, & George Surgeon News & Notes is a quarterly publication of the Oriental Institute, printed exclusively as one of the privileges of membership. ON THE COVER: View of the Nile from the Old Cataract Hotel, Aswan Egypt. BACKGROUND: Castelli drawing of a wondrous pear in human form. Biblioteca Communale di Palermo, Ms.3 Qq E 94, fol. 36r. oi.uchicago.edu From the DIRECTOR’S STUDY REMEMBERING MIGUEL CIVIL (1926–2019) Miguel Civil’s scholarly contributions are simply monumental—more than any other scholar, he shaped the modern, post-WWII, study of Sumerology. Our understanding of Sumerian writing, lexicography, grammar, literature, agriculture, and socio-economic institutions all bear his deep imprint. He was a mentor, teacher, and friend to two generations of Sumerologists, Assyriologists, and archaeologists. It remains the greatest honor of my career to have come to Chicago to replace Miguel after he retired in 2001. Born outside of Barcelona in 1926 and trained in Paris, Miguel came to the US in 1958 to take the position of associate researcher under Samuel Noah Kramer at the Uni- versity of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Vasemania: Neoclassical Form and Ornament
    VOLUME: 4 WINTER, 2004 Vasemania: Neoclassical Form and Ornament: Selections from The Metropolitan Museum of Art at the Bard Graduate Center for Studies in the Decorative Arts, Design, and Culture Review by Nancy H. Ramage 1) is a copy of a vase that belonged to Ithaca College Hamilton, painted in Wedgwood’s “encaustic” technique that imitated red-figure with red, An unusual and worthwhile exhibit on the orange, and white painted on top of the “black passion for vases in the 18th century has been basalt” body, as he called it. But here, assembled at the Bard Graduate Center in Wedgwood’s artist has taken all the figures New York City. The show, entitled that encircle the entire vessel on the original, Vasemania: Neoclassical Form and and put them on the front of the pot, just as Ornament: Selections from The Metropolitan they appear in a plate in Hamilton’s first vol- Museum of Art, was curated by a group of ume in the publication of his first collection, graduate students, together with Stefanie sold to the British Museum in 1772. On the Walker at Bard and William Rieder at the Met. original Greek pot, the last two figures on the It aims to set out the different kinds of taste — left and right goût grec, goût étrusque, goût empire — that sides were Fig. 1 Wedgwood Hydria, developed over a period of decades across painted on the Etruria Works, Staffordshire, Britain, France, Italy, Spain, and Germany. back of the ves- ca. 1780. Black basalt with “encaustic” painting. The at the Bard Graduate Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications of the INSTITUTE of ARCHAEOLOGY the HEBREW UNIVERSITY of JERUSALEM in Cooperation with the ISRAEL EXPLORATION SOCIETY QEDEM REPORTS 10
    Publications of THE INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM in cooperation with THE ISRAEL EXPLORATION SOCIETY QEDEM REPORTS 10 EDITORIAL BOARD Y. Garfinkel, N. Goring-Morris, T. Ornan, N. Panitz-Cohen, Z. Weiss 2018 Ayelet Gilboa, Ilan Sharon, Jeffrey R. Zorn and Sveta Matskevich EXCAVATIONS AT DOR, FINAL REPORT VOLUME IIA AREA G, THE LATE BRONZE AND IRON AGES: SYNTHESIS, ARCHITECTURE AND STRATIGRAPHY DIRECTED BY EPHRAIM STERN 1986–2000 ILAN SHARON AND AYELET GILBOA 2002–2004 with contributions by: John E. Berg, Elizabeth Bloch-Smith, Allen Estes THE RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION OF THE LATE BRONZE AND IRON AGE REMAINS FROM AREA G WERE MADE POSSIBLE THROUGH: The ongoing support of The Goldhirsh-Yellin Foundation, California A publication grant of the Shelby White-Leon Levy Program for Archaeological Publications Certain aspects of the research were conducted with the aid of the Israel Science Foundation: Grant No. 812/97 (stratigraphical and ceramic analysis); Grant Nos. 778/00, 141/04; The Getty Collaborative Research Program, the Israel-Hungary Bi-national Science Foundation and the US National Science Foundation (Grant EAR01–15488) Anonymous donors We also acknowledge the support of: The Israel Exploration Society and its director, Joseph Aviram The Muriel and Philip Berman Center for Biblical Archaeology The Institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem The Zinman Institute of Archaeology, The University of Haifa The Kimmel Center for Archaeological Science, The Weizmann Institute of Science The Division of Humanities and the Department of History of Art, College of Letters and Science, University of California, Berkeley The Cornell University Hirsch Fund The Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University Special thanks to: Andrew Stewart, who directed the first decade of excavations in Area G and who graciously provided many of the photographs used in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Ports Phéniciens Du Liban in the Lebanon Issue 36-37 Milieux Naturels, Organisation Spatiale Et Autumn -S Pring 2012-13 , Pp
    ARCHAEOLOGY & H ISTORY LES PORTS PHÉNICIENS DU LIBAN IN THE LEBANON ISSUE 36-37 MILIEUX NATURELS, ORGANISATION SPATIALE ET AUTUMN -S PRING 2012-13 , PP. 1-137. INFRASTRUCTURES NICOLAS CARAYON 1 H 1 Carte 1 : SARDAIG les 183 agglomérations (1) Olbia portuaires phéniciennes ESPAGNE (4) Carbo et/ou puniques (1) Guardamar del Segura ; (2) Carthagène ; (7) Bitia ; (3) Villaricos ; (4) Adra ;(5) Almuñecar ;(6) Chorreras ; (Carayon, 2008). (10) Sulc (7) Morro de Mezquitilla ; (8) Cerro del Mar ; (9) Toscanos ; (12) Carlo (10) Malaga ; (11) Cerro del Villar ; (12) Cerro del Castillo ; (15) Thar (13) Torreon ; (14) Montilla ; (15) Carteia ; 1 (16) Cerro del Prado ; (17) Tarifa ; (18) Cadix ; (19) Castillo de Doña Blanca. 17 SARDAIGNE 16 15 14 2 2 1 13 5 3 3 12 4 PORTUGAL 4 11 6 10 5 BALEARES 9 8 7 Abul (1) Mahon ; (2) Cala Coves ; 1 (3) Na Guardis ; (4) Ibiza ; (5) Sa Caleta. ESPAGNE 2 27 28 26 3 25 19 3 18 9 6 30 29 21 10 9 7 12 10 5 1 17 19 11 5 4 24 13 16 15 14 2 20 16 14 6 13 11 8 4 23 22 15 8 7 18 12 15 17 16 17 14 18 13 3 19 TUNISIE 4 20 12 10 9 5 2 1 21 ALGERIE 11 6 22 8 7 7 MAROC 6 5 4 8 3 MAROC 2 (1) Melilla ; (2) S. Abdeslam del Behar ; (3) Ceuta ; (4) Tanger ; (5) Kouass ; (6) Lixus ; (7) Sala ; (8) El-Djadida ; (9) Mogador. ALGERIE (1) Annaba ; (2) Skikda ; (3) Collo ; (4) Djidjelli ; (5) Bougie ; (6) Aze"oun ; (7) Taksebt ; (8) Tigzirt ; (9) Dellys ; (10) Cap Djinet ; (11) Mers el-Hadjedje ; (12) Matifou ; (13) Alger ; (14) Tipaza ; (15) Cherchel; (16) Gouraya ; (17) Arzew ; (18) Andalouses ; (19) Mersa Madakh ; (20) Mersa Bou Zedjar ; (21) Rachgoun ; (22) Siga.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print t>leedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6’ x 9” black arxf white photographic prints are available for any pfiotographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI TRADE IN THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN, 100-700 AD: THE CERAMIC EVIDENCE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert Scott Moore, M.A., B.A. The Ohio State University 2000 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Timothy E.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazor, Dor and Megiddo in the Time of Ahab and Under Assyrian Rule Author(S): EPHRAIM STERN Source: Israel Exploration Journal, Vol
    Hazor, Dor and Megiddo in the Time of Ahab and under Assyrian Rule Author(s): EPHRAIM STERN Source: Israel Exploration Journal, Vol. 40, No. 1 (1990), pp. 12-30 Published by: Israel Exploration Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27926166 Accessed: 20-10-2017 06:56 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Israel Exploration Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Israel Exploration Journal This content downloaded from 109.67.249.19 on Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:56:20 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Hazor, Dor and Megiddo in the Time of Ahab and under Assyrian Rule* EPHRAIM STERN Institute of Archaeology The Hebrew University of Jerusalem INTRODUCTION IN the early 1960s, shortly after the publication of his well-known article, 'Hazor, Gezer and Megiddo in Solomon's Time',1 the late Y. Yadin advised me to undertake an examination of the fortifications and gates of Palestine as the subject of my master's thesis. After completing it, I published some of my conclusions on the Iron Age gates,2 to which I now return after excavating two gates at Dor.
    [Show full text]
  • British Archaeological Reports
    British Archaeological Reports Gordon House, 276 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7ED, England Tel +44 (0) 1865 311914 Fax +44 (0) 1865 512231 [email protected] www.archaeopress.com TITLES IN PRINT JANUARY 2013 – BAR INTERNATIONAL SERIES The BAR series of archaeological monographs were started in 1974 by Anthony Hands and David Walker. From 1991, the publishers have been Tempus Reparatum, Archaeopress and John and Erica Hedges. From 2010 they are published exclusively by Archaeopress. Descriptions of the Archaeopress titles are to be found on www.archaeopress.com Publication proposals to [email protected] Sign up to our ALERTS SERVICE Find us on Facebook www.facebook.com/Archaeopress. and Twitter www.twitter.com/archaeopress BAR –S545, 1989 Ecology, Settlement and History in the Osmore Drainage, Peru edited by Don S. Rice, Charles Stanish and Philip R. Scarr. ISBN 0 86054 692 6. £42.00. BAR –S546, 1989 Formal Variation in Australian Spear and Spearthrower Technology by B. J. Cundy. ISBN 0 86054 693 4. £13.00. BAR –S547, 1989 The Early Roman Frontier in the Upper Rhine Area Assimilation and Acculturation on a Roman Frontier by Marcia L. Okun. ISBN 0 86054 694 2. £25.00. BAR –S548, 1989 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1989 edited by Sebastian Rahtz and Julian Richards. ISBN 0 86054 695 0. £29.00. BAR –S549, 1989 La Colonización Griega en Sicilia Griegos, Indígenas y Púnicos en la Sicilia Arcaica: Interacción por Adopho J. Dominguez. ISBN 0 86054 696 9. £58.00. BAR –S550, 1989 Art, Death and Social Order The Mortuary Arts of Pre-Conquest Central Panama by Peter S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Archaeological Evidence
    2 THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE THE SHARON AND THE CARMEL COAST All the sites on the Canaanite coast of the I:Iefer Valley, in the Sharon, and on the Carmel coast­ The data contained in the above-mentioned documents without exception-were laid waste at the end of the as well as the biblical sources indicate that after the de­ thirteenth century BCE in a total destruction that put struction of the Canaanite world, Philistines had settled an end to Canaanite culture and Egyptian domina­ in southern Palestine; the Bible, the Egyptian sources, tion. This destruction has been attributed by the ex­ and the archaeological evidence all provide consid­ cavators of all the settlements in these areas to the erable information about Philistine domination and Sea Peoples (Gadot 2008, Paley and Porath 1993; settlement of this area and about their five great cities. Kochavi 1993; Herzog, Rapp, and Negbi 1989; Stern As was stated above, their northern border was at the 1978; Stern 2000; Artzy 1993; Elgavish 1994; M, Do­ Yarkon River, where the remains of several flourish­ than 1955; 1986; Ben-Tor, Bonfil, and Zuckerman 2003; ing Sea Peoples' cities were uncovered: The first, Tel Ben-Tor, Zarzecki-Peleg, and Cohen-Anidjar 2005). Aphek, was excavated by M. Kochavi and published by Following this destruction, four groups of settlements Gadot and Yadin (Beck and Kochavi 1993; Gadot 2006; can be distinguished. The first comprises Late Bronze Gadot and Yadin 2009:300-314); others include Tell Age settlements which were destroyed and never re­ Qasile with its buildings and temples, discovered by built.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrographic Variability of the Fabrics of Wine Jars from Sha'ar-Ha
    Études et Travaux XXX (2017), 339–387 Petrographic Variability of the Fabrics of Wine Jars from Sha‘ar-Ha Ἁmakim as a Refl ection of Diff erences in Their Provenance and Chronology J M, J M Abstract: The aim of the present study is to investigate the relationship between the shape of the Levantine wine jars discovered at Sha‘ar-Ha Ἁmakim and the petrography of their respective fabrics. The majority of sampled ceramic material originates in well-defi ned chronological phases of the settlement at the site, spanning the Persian through to the Middle Roman periods. The obtained results clearly demonstrate a connection between the historical period and the raw materials used in jar production. Specifi cally, the jars of the Phoenician type used in the Persian and Hellenistic periods were made from a fairly homogeneous raw material, the features of which such as the content of the fragments of the coralline alga Amphiroa confi rm the previous results of the investigations of jars whose fabric has been considered as Phoenician. On the other hand the bag-shaped jars, especially those of the Hellenistic period, are characterized by the more diversifi ed petrography of their fabrics, suggesting that they were produced by a number of local workshops to supply the needs of local wineries. Finally, the Roman period brings an abrupt change in the production of wine containers, with the introduction of the common use of the fi ne ferruginous soil rich in quartz silt. Keywords: Sha‘ar-Ha Ἁmakim, wine jars, Persian period, Hellenistic period, Roman period, jars petrography Jacek Michniewicz, Institute of Geology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań; [email protected] Jolanta Młynarczyk, Institute of Archaeology, University of Warsaw, Warszawa; [email protected] As is known from written sources and archaeological fi nds, Galilee was a region abounding not only in olive groves, but also in vineyards.1 The wine that came from them was prob- ably an object of regional trade, especially intense in the borderland between western Galilee and southern Phoenicia.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 REFERENCES Abel M. 1903. Inscriptions Grecques De
    1 REFERENCES Abel M. 1903. Inscriptions grecques de Bersabée. RB 12:425–430. Abel F.M. 1926. Inscription grecque de l’aqueduc de Jérusalem avec la figure du pied byzantin. RB 35:284–288. Abel F.M. 1941. La liste des donations de Baîbars en Palestine d’après la charte de 663H. (1265). JPOS 19:38–44. Abela J. and Pappalardo C. 1998. Umm al-Rasas, Church of St. Paul: Southeastern Flank. LA 48:542–546. Abdou Daoud D.A. 1998. Evidence for the Production of Bronze in Alexandria. In J.-Y. Empereur ed. Commerce et artisanat dans l’Alexandrie hellénistique et romaine (Actes du Colloque d’Athènes, 11–12 décembre 1988) (BCH Suppl. 33). Paris. Pp. 115–124. Abu-Jaber N. and al Sa‘ad Z. 2000. Petrology of Middle Islamic Pottery from Khirbat Faris, Jordan. Levant 32:179–188. Abulafia D. 1980. Marseilles, Acre and the Mediterranean, 1200–1291. In P.W. Edbury and D.M. Metcalf eds. Coinage in the Latin West (BAR Int. S. 77). Oxford. Pp. 19– 39. Abu l’Faraj al-Ush M. 1960. Al-fukhar ghair al-mutli (The Unglazed Pottery). AAS 10:135–184 (Arabic). Abu Raya R. and Weissman M. 2013. A Burial Cave from the Roman and Byzantine Periods at ‘En Ya‘al, Jerusalem. ‘Atiqot 76:11*–14* (Hebrew; English summary, pp. 217). Abu Raya R. and Zissu B. 2000. Burial Caves from the Second Temple Period on Mount Scopus. ‘Atiqot 40:1*–12* (Hebrew; English summary, p. 157). Abu-‘Uqsa H. 2006. Kisra. ‘Atiqot 53:9*–19* (Hebrew; English summary, pp.
    [Show full text]