DOCSLIB.ORG

1 REFERENCES Abel M. 1903. Inscriptions Grecques De

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 REFERENCES Abel M. 1903. Inscriptions Grecques De 1 REFERENCES Abel M. 1903. Inscriptions grecques de Bersabée. RB 12:425–430. Abel F.M. 1926. Inscription grecque de l’aqueduc de Jérusalem avec la figure du pied byzantin. RB 35:284–288. Abel F.M. 1941. La liste des donations de Baîbars en Palestine d’après la charte de 663H. (1265). JPOS 19:38–44. Abela J. and Pappalardo C. 1998. Umm al-Rasas, Church of St. Paul: Southeastern Flank. LA 48:542–546. Abdou Daoud D.A. 1998. Evidence for the Production of Bronze in Alexandria. In J.-Y. Empereur ed. Commerce et artisanat dans l’Alexandrie hellénistique et romaine (Actes du Colloque d’Athènes, 11–12 décembre 1988) (BCH Suppl. 33). Paris. Pp. 115–124. Abu-Jaber N. and al Sa‘ad Z. 2000. Petrology of Middle Islamic Pottery from Khirbat Faris, Jordan. Levant 32:179–188. Abulafia D. 1980. Marseilles, Acre and the Mediterranean, 1200–1291. In P.W. Edbury and D.M. Metcalf eds. Coinage in the Latin West (BAR Int. S. 77). Oxford. Pp. 19– 39. Abu l’Faraj al-Ush M. 1960. Al-fukhar ghair al-mutli (The Unglazed Pottery). AAS 10:135–184 (Arabic). Abu Raya R. and Weissman M. 2013. A Burial Cave from the Roman and Byzantine Periods at ‘En Ya‘al, Jerusalem. ‘Atiqot 76:11*–14* (Hebrew; English summary, pp. 217). Abu Raya R. and Zissu B. 2000. Burial Caves from the Second Temple Period on Mount Scopus. ‘Atiqot 40:1*–12* (Hebrew; English summary, p. 157). Abu-‘Uqsa H. 2006. Kisra. ‘Atiqot 53:9*–19* (Hebrew; English summary, pp. 196–197). 2 Abu-‘Uqsa H. 2013. The Late Bronze Age II ‘Fisherman’s Grave’ from Akhziv. ‘Atiqot 74:1*–7* (Hebrew; English summary, pp. 241). Acconci A. 1994. L’arredo liturgico. In M. Piccirillo and E. Alliata. Umm al-Rasas .(ah I: Gli scavi del complesso di Santo Stefano (SBF Collectio Maior 28׳Mayfa Jerusalem. Pp. 290–313. Acconci A. 1998. Elements of the Liturgical Furniture. In M. Piccirillo and E. Alliata. Mount Nebo: New Archaeological Excavations 1967–1997 (SBF Collectio Maior 27) (2 vols.). Jerusalem. Pp. 468–542. Acién C.P. and Bass G.F. 2009. Bubble-Rim Bottles. In G.F. Bass, R.H. Brill, B. Lledó and S.D. Matthews. Serçe Limani II: The Glass of an Eleventh-Century Shipwreck. College Station, Tex. Pp. 215–221. Acquaro E. ed. 1996. Alle soglie della classicità; Il Mediterraneo tra tradizione e innovazione. Studi in onore di Sabatino Moscati I: Storia e culture. Pisa–Rome. ‘Ad U. 2012. Ḥorbat Burin (East): Remains of Buildings and a Pottery Kiln from the Persian to the Beginning of the Early Islamic Periods. ‘Atiqot 70:21–31 (Hebrew; English summary, pp. 80*–81*). Ad U. and Frankel R. 2012. Lever-and-Drum Presses at Moshav Habonim and Ḥorvat ‘Aqav (Ramat Hanadiv). IEJ 62:101–112. Adam J.-P. 1994. Roman Building: Materials and Techniques. London–New York. Adams J.L. 1989. Methods for Improving Ground Stone Artifact Analysis: Experiments in Mano Wear Patterns. In D.S. Amick and R.P. Mauldin eds. Experiments in Lithic Technology (BAR Int. S. 528). Oxford. Pp. 259–276. Adams J.L. 2002. Ground Stone Analysis: A Technological Approach. Salt Lake City. Adams R.McC. 1970. Tell Abū-Sarīfa: A Sassanian-Islamic Ceramic Sequence from South Central Iraq. Ars Orientalis 8:87–119. 3 Adan-Bayewitz D. 1986. The Pottery from the Late Byzantine Building (Stratum 4) and Its Implications. In L.I. Levine and E. Netzer. Excavations at Caesarea Maritima 1975, 1976, 1979—Final Report (Qedem 21). Jerusalem. Pp. 90–129. Adan-Bayewitz D. 1990. The Pottery. In S. Wachsmann. The Excavation of an Ancient Boat in the Sea of Galilee (Lake Kinneret) (‘Atiqot 19). Jerusalem. Pp. 89–96. Adan-Bayewitz D. 1993. Common Pottery in Roman Galilee: A Study of Local Trade. Ramat Gan. Adan-Bayewitz D. 2003. On the Chronology of the Common Pottery of Northern Roman Judaea/Palestine. In G.C. Bottini, L. Di Segni and L.D. Chrupcała eds. One Land— Many Cultures: Archaeological Studies in Honour of Stanislao Loffreda OFM (SBF Collectio Maior 41) Jerusalem. Pp. 5–32. Adan-Bayewitz D., Asaro F., Giauque R.D., Wieder M., Shaked I., Avshalom-Gorni D. and Gan D. 2002. Pottery Manufacture in Roman Galilee: Distinguishing Similar Provenance Groups Using High-Precision X-Ray Fluorescence and Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis. In V. Kilikoglou, A. Hein and Y. Maniatis eds. Modern Trends in Scientific Studies on Ancient Ceramics (Papers Presented at the 5th European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics, Athens 1999) (BAR Int. S. 1011). Oxford. Pp. 361–370. Adan-Bayewitz D., Asaro F., Wieder M. and Giauque R.D. 2008. Preferential Distribution of Lamps from the Jerusalem Area in the Late Second Temple Period (Late First Century B.C.E.–70 C.E.). BASOR 350:37–85. Adan-Bayewitz D. and Aviam M. 1997. Iotapata, Josephus, and the Siege of 67: Preliminary Report on the 1992–94 Seasons. JRA 10:131–165. Adan-Bayewitz D. and Wieder M. 1992. Ceramics from Roman Galilee: A Comparison of Several Techniques for Fabric Characterization. JFA 19:189–205. 4 Adawi Z. 2013. A Burial Cave and an Agricultural Terrace at Khirbat el-Mughram in the Shu‘afat Neighborhood, Jerusalem. ‘Atiqot 76:1*–9* (Hebrew; English summary, pp. 215–216). Adelson H.L. 1957. Light Weight Solidi and Byzantine Trade during the Sixth and Seventh Centuries (Numismatic Notes and Monographs 138). New York. Adkins L. and Adkins R.A. 1996. Dictionary of Roman Religion. New York. Adler N. 2004. A Comprehensive Catalog of Oil Lamps of the Holy Land from the Adler Collection. Jerusalem. Adler N. and Peleg O. 2007. The Pottery Assemblage from a Byzantine Building in Area XIV. In E. Mazar. The Temple Mount Excavations in Jerusalem 1968–1978 Directed by Benjamin Mazar; Final Reports III: The Byzantine Period (Qedem 46). Jerusalem. Pp. 71–80. Adovasio J.M. 1975–1977. The Textile and Basketry Impressions from Jarmo. Paléorient 3:223–230. Agadi S. 1996. The Bone Objects. In A. Ben-Tor, M. Avissar and Y. Portugali. Yoqne‘am I: The Late Periods (Qedem Reports 3). Jerusalem. Pp. 236–238. Agady S., Arazi M., Arubas B., Hadad S., Khamis E. and Tsafrir Y. 2002. Byzantine Shops in the Street of the Monuments at Bet Shean (Scythopolis). In L.V. Rutgers ed. What Athens Has To Do with Jerusalem: Essays on Classical, Jewish, and Early Christian Art and Archaeology in Honor of Gideon Foerster (Interdisciplinary Studies in Ancient Culture and Religion 1). Leuven. Pp. 423–506. Aharoni Y. 1961. The Expedition to the Judean Desert, 1960: Expedition B. IEJ 11:11–24. Aharoni Y. 1962. Excavations at Ramat Raḥel I: Seasons 1959 and 1960 (Centro di studi semitici, serie archeologica 2). Rome. 5 Aharoni Y. 1964. Excavations at Ramat Raḥel II: Seasons 1961 and 1962 (Centro di studi semitici, serie archeologica 6). Rome. Aharoni Y. ed. 1973. Beer-Sheba I: Excavations at Tel Beer-Sheba, 1969–1971 Seasons (Tel Aviv University Institute of Archaeology Publications 2). Tel Aviv. Aharoni Y. 1973. The Stratification of the Site. In Y. Aharoni ed. Beer-Sheba I: Excavations at Tel Beer-Sheba 1969–1971 Seasons (Tel Aviv University Institute of Archaeology Publications 2). Tel Aviv. Pp. 4–8. Aharoni Y. 1975. Lachish V: Investigations at Lachish; The Sanctuary and the Residency (Tel Aviv University Institute of Archaeology Publications 4). Tel Aviv. Ahn S. 2010. The Domestic Architecture of Jordan-Palestine in the Early Islamic Period: An Archaeological Approach. M.A. thesis. American University in Cairo. Cairo. Aitchison N.B. 1988. Roman Wealth, Native Ritual: Coin Hoards within and beyond Roman Britain. WA 20:270–284. AJC: Y. Meshorer. Ancient Jewish Coinage (2 vols.). Dix Hills, N.Y. 1982. AJC 1: Y. Meshorer. Ancient Jewish Coinage 1: Persian Period through Hasmonaeans. Dix Hills, N.Y. 1982. AJC 2: Y. Meshorer. Ancient Jewish Coinage 2: Herod the Great through Bar Cochba. Dix Hills, N.Y. 1982. Akkermans P.M.M.G. 1989. The Other Small Finds of Tell Sabi Abyad. In P.M.M.G. Akkermans ed. Excavations at Tell Sabi Abyad: Prehistoric Investigations in the Balikh Valley, Northern Syria (BAR Int. S. 468). Oxford. Pp. 285–294. Alarcão J. and Alarcão A. 1965. Vidros romanos de Conimbriga. Coimbra. Albright W.F. 1921–1922. Contributions to the Historical Geography of Palestine. AASOR 2–3:1–46. 6 Albright W.F. 1932. The Excavation of Tell Beit Mirsim I: The Pottery of the First Three Campaigns (AASOR 12). New Haven. Albright W.F. 1933. The Excavation of Tell Beit Mirsim IA: The Bronze Age Pottery of the Fourth Campaign. AASOR 13:55–127. Albright W.F. 1943. The Excavation of Tell Beit Mirsim III: The Iron Age (AASOR 21– 22). New Haven. Alcock J.P. 2001. Food in Roman Britain. Stroud. Aldred C. 1971. Jewels of the Pharaohs: Egyptian Jewellery of the Dynastic Period. London. Aldsworth F., Haggarty G., Jennings S. and Whitehouse D. 2002. Medieval Glassmaking at Tyre, Lebanon. JGS 44:49–66. Alexandre Y. 1999. Two Burial Caves at Kh. Naṣr ed-Din, Tiberias. ‘Atiqot 37:79–82 (Hebrew; English summary p. 171*). Alexandre Y. 2003. An Iron IB/IIA Burial Cave at Har Yona, Upper Nazareth. ‘Atiqot 44:183–189. Alexandre Y. 2012. The Glass Finds. In Y. Alexandre. Mary’s Well, Nazareth: The Late Hellenistic to the Ottoman Periods (IAA Reports 49). Jerusalem. Pp. 89–106. Alexandre Y. 2012. The Pottery. In Y. Alexandre. Mary’s Well, Nazareth: The Late Hellenistic to the Ottoman Periods (IAA Reports 49). Jerusalem. Pp. 57–88. Alexandre Y. 2012. Mary’s Well, Nazareth: The Late Hellenistic to the Ottoman Periods (IAA Reports 49).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Oberlin Near East Study Collection in Context Julian Hirsch
    1 The Oberlin Near East Study Collection in Context *See page 4 for citation. Julian Hirsch 2 Acknowledgements In some ways the groundwork for my thesis and work on the ONESC Initiative began more than five years ago in a kitchen in Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania. I was meeting Dr. Elizabeth Bloch Smith for the first time and could scarcely have imagined that our meeting would lead to my participation in an archaeological excavation in Israel that summer. After my first excavation, I was hooked. The spring before I came to Oberlin was filled with weekly meetings, readings, and discussions with Liz. I learned so much in that time and appreciate her continued guidance and support. If Liz was responsible for exposing me to just how fascinating the archaeology of the southern Levant was, Dr. Jeffrey Blakely was the person who helped me find the path where I could follow my passion at Oberlin. I still have my notes from the first day of the January 2017 Winter Term. I was amazed by everything Jeff knew about the history of biblical archaeology at the college and the history of the collection. If anything inspired me throughout my work, it was hearing vivid stories from Jeff about sitting in Harry Thomas Frank’s classroom learning about archaeology. Jeff has truly been my partner at every step of the way. I’ve consulted him for advice numerous times. Jeff kindly provided invaluable suggestions that only a true veteran of the field could offer. To give credit to Jeff in two more areas, Jeff certainly inspired my interest in the history of biblical archaeology and during the Winter Term in 2017 assigned me to work on the Bab edh-Dhra’ collection of Early Bronze Age tomb pots.
    [Show full text]
  • The Good Samaritan Inn 55 NATIONAL PARKS and NATURE Mosaic Museum RESERVES
    BUY AN ISRAEL NATURE AND PARKS AUTHORITY SUBSCRIPTION FOR UNLIMITED FREE ENTRY TO The Good Samaritan Inn 55 NATIONAL PARKS AND NATURE Mosaic Museum RESERVES. A lioness from the Gaza mosaic Rules of Conduct ■ Do not harm the antiquities: Do not carve on them, walk on them or pour water on them. ■ Do not collect “souvenirs” from remains scattered in the area. ■ Do not enter places that are off-limits for visitors. Nearby Sites: ■ Do not cross fences or roll stones. ■ Please keep the area clean. Qumran Location of the Good Samaritan Inn Mosaic Museum National Park about 25 minutes’ drive The museum is on the southern side of the Jerusalem–Jericho road (road 1) between kilometer markers 80 and 81. The interchange affords easy access from whichever direction you approach. To reserve a guided tour for a group, email: You Enot Tsukim are here Nature Reserve [email protected] about 25 minutes’ drive Hours: Daily from 8:00 to 17:00. En Prat During winter time, the site closes one hour earlier. Nature Reserve On Fridays and holiday eves, the site closes one hour earlier. about 20 minutes’ drive Entry is permitted up to one hour before closing. Text: Ya‘acov Shkolnik Translation: Miriam Feinberg Vamosh 6.18 Photos: Israel Nature and Parks Authority Archive; Ya‘acov Shkolnik; Tal Romano; Amir Aloni Production: Adi Greenbaum www.parks.org.il I *3639 I © Israel Nature and Parks Authority The Good Samaritan Inn, Tel: 02-6338230 established on the initiative of the archaeologist Dr. Yitzhak Welcome to the Magen, who served as the head of the Judea and Samaria Inn of the Good Samaritan Archaeology Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Civilians Weekly Report
    U N I TOCHA E D Weekly N A Report: T I O 28N FebruaryS – 6 March 2007 N A T I O N S| 1 U N I E S OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS P.O. Box 38712, East Jerusalem, Phone: (+972) 2-582 9962 / 582 5853, Fax: (+972) 2-582 5841 [email protected], www.ochaopt.org Protection of Civilians Weekly Report 28 February – 6 March 2007 Of note this week The IDF imposed a total closure on the West Bank during the Jewish holiday of Purim between 2 – 5 March. The closure prevented Palestinians, including workers, with valid permits, from accessing East Jerusalem and Israel during the four days. It is a year – the start of the 2006 Purim holiday – since Palestinian workers from the Gaza Strip have been prevented from accessing jobs in Israel. West Bank: − On 28 February, the IDF re-entered Nablus for one day to continue its largest scale operation for three years, codenamed ‘Hot Winter’. This second phase of the operation again saw a curfew imposed on the Old City, the occupation of schools and homes and house-to-house searches. The IDF also surrounded the three major hospitals in the area and checked all Palestinians entering and leaving. According to the Nablus Municipality 284 shops were damaged during the course of the operation. − Israeli Security Forces were on high alert in and around the Old city of Jerusalem in anticipation of further demonstrations and clashes following Friday Prayers at Al Aqsa mosque. Due to the Jewish holiday of Purim over the weekend, the Israeli authorities declared a blanket closure from Friday 2 March until the morning of Tuesday 6 March and all major roads leading to the Old City were blocked.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vandalism of the Mosaics in the Severan Synagogue in Hammat Tiberias
    Rebecca Kasmin The Vandalism of the Mosaics in the Severan Synagogue in Hammat Tiberias Rebecca Kasmin In the third and fourth century CE, the ancient city of Hammat Tiberias, located in modern-day Israel, developed as a Jewish center. One of its synagogues, excavated in the 1960s, contains a remarkable floor mosaic, one of the earliest synagogue mosaics in the country. It is composed of several panels, depicting traditional Jewish religious objects, as well as a zodiac wheel, complete with personifications of the four seasons, plus the figure of the god Helios in the middle, riding in his chariot. The extraordinary nature and circumstances of the mosaic and synagogue make its recent vandalism all the more difficult to bear. This article analyzes the vandalism of the mosaics that occurred on May 29, 2012, which seems most likely to be attributable to the Haredim, an ultra-orthodox sect of Judaism. After a discussion of the history of the site, and an analysis of the mosaics themselves, I discuss the perpetrators and their motive, the physical damage, recent comparable acts, and what could be done to prevent future attacks of a similar nature. One can only hope that raising awareness of these acts will prevent them in the future. 78 Chronika The Vandalism of the Mosaics in the Severan Synagogue in Hammat Tiberias Introduction years later, the Romans, always quick to take advantage of such a sought-after commodity, In 1920, the unsuspecting Jewish Labor erected beautiful spas and turned the town into Battalion was paving a road between the cities a popular resort.5 Hammat is mentioned as a of Tiberias and Zemach in Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illnesses of Herod the Great 1. Introduction 2. Sources of Information
    The illnesses of Herod the Great THE ILLNESSES OF HEROD THE GREAT ABSTRACT Herod the Great, Idumean by birth, was king of the Jews from 40BC to AD 4. An able statesman, builder and warrior, he ruthlessly stamped out all perceived opposi- tion to his rule. His last decade was characterised by vicious strife within his family and progressive ill health. We review the nature of his illnesses and suggest that he had meningoencephalitis in 59 BC, and that he died primarily of uraemia and hyper- tensive heart failure, but accept diabetes mellitus as a possible underlying etiological factor. The possibility that Josephus’s classical description of Herod’s disease could be biased by “topos” biography (popular at the time), is discussed. The latter conside- ration is particularly relevant in determining the significance of the king’s reputed worm- infested genital lesions. 1. INTRODUCTION Herod the Great, king of the Jews at the onset of the Christian era, had no Jewish blood in his veins. Infamous in Christian tradition for the massacre of the newborn in Bethlehem, he was nevertheless a vigorous and able ruler, a prolific builder, friend and ally of Rome and founder of an extensive Herodian dynasty which significantly influenced the history of Palestine. His miserable death at the age of 69 years was seen by the Jewish religious fraternity as Jahweh’s just retribution for his vio- lation of Judaic traditions (Ferguson 1987:328-330; Sizoo 1950:6-9). The nature and cause of his illness and death is the subject of this study. 2. SOURCES OF INFORMATION With the exception of fragmentary contributions from Rabbinic tradi- tions, Christian records in the New Testament and evidence from con- temporary coins, Herod’s biography comes to us predominantly through the writings of Flavius Josephus, a Jewish priest of aristocratic descent, military commander in a revolt against Rome, but subsequent recipient of Roman citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • 99.8% of State Lands Allocated in the West Bank Were Given to Israelis; Palestinians Were Given Almost Nothing
    State Land Allocation in the West Bank—For Israelis Only, July 2018 99.8% of state lands allocated in the West Bank were given to Israelis; Palestinians were given almost nothing Following a request under the Freedom of Information Act submitted by Peace Now and the Movement for Freedom of Information (and after refusing to give the information and a two-and-a-half year delay), the Civil Administration's response was received: 99.76% (about 674,459 dunams) of state land allocated for any use in the Occupied West Bank was allocated for the needs of Israeli settlements. The Palestinians were allocated, at most, only 0.24% (about 1,625 dunams). Some 80% of the allocations to Palestinians (1,299 dunams) were for the purpose of establishing settlements (669 dunams) and for the forced transfer of Bedouin communities (630 dunams). Only 326 dunams at most were allocated without strings for the benefit of Palestinians, and at least 121 of those dunams are currently in Area B under Palestinian control. Most of the allocations to the Palestinians (about 53%) were made prior to the 1995 Interim Agreement (the Oslo II Agreement, in which the West Bank was divided into Areas A, B and C, and transferred control over 40% of the West Bank to the Palestinian Authority). The High Court of Justice is currently facing the issue of the evacuation of the Palestinian village of Al-Khan al- Ahmar, which the state wants to demolish and expel its residents to another area. The residents of the village are asking the High Court of Justice to stop the evacuation until the Civil Administration discusses the detailed construction plan they prepared for the village's approval, which the state has refused to consider.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability in Levantine Tree-Ring Records
    VARIABILITY IN LEVANTINE TREE-RING RECORDS AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN DENDROCHRONOLOGICAL DATING, PROVENANCING, AND PALEOENVIRONMENTAL RECONSTRUCTION IN THE SOUTHERN LEVANT A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Brita Elizabeth Lorentzen August 2015 © 2015 Brita Elizabeth Lorentzen VARIABILITY IN LEVANTINE TREE-RING RECORDS AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN DENDROCHRONOLOGICAL DATING, PROVENANCING, AND PALEOENVIRONMENTAL RECONSTRUCTION IN THE SOUTHERN LEVANT Brita Elizabeth Lorentzen, Ph.D. Cornell University 2015 The East Mediterranean littoral (the Levant) is a bioclimatically diverse region with a rich cultural heritage. Such bioclimatic diversity creates important regional variations in vegetation growth and (potentially) human-landscape interactions, and critically impacts how one interprets and uses the region’s paleoenvironmental data. This study examines how to use dendrochronology to investigate paleoenvironmental change and date and source historical/archaeological timbers in such a varied landscape, focusing on the southern Levant (southern Lebanon, Israel/Palestine, Jordan, and the northern Sinai Peninsula). Chapter 1 introduces the Levant’s physical geography and climate. I review basic dendrochronological principles and applications in dating, provenancing, and climate reconstruction, and previous dendrochronological research in the Levant. In Chapter 2, I investigate variability in tree-ring growth patterns and climate responses of multiple tree species sampled along ecological gradients in the southern Levant. In Chapter 3, I compare tree-ring growth patterns and climate responses of Pinus halpensis Mill. and Pinus brutia Ten. sampled along bioclimatic gradients in both the southern and northern Levant. Finally, in Chapters 4 and 5, I use dendrochronological techniques to date and source timbers from al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, and two late 19th century buildings in Jaffa, Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Middle East at Peace: Hidden Issues in Arab–Israeli Hydropolitics
    Water Resources Development, Vol. 20, No. 2, 193–204, June 2004 Towards a Middle East at Peace: Hidden Issues in Arab–Israeli Hydropolitics ARNON MEDZINI* & AARON T. WOLF** *Department of Geography, Oranim School of Education, Tivon, Israel **Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA ABSTRACT When peace negotiations do one day resume between Israelis and Arabs, shared water resources will again take centre stage, acting both as an irritant between the parties, and as a tremendous inducement to reach agreement. The ‘hidden’ hydropo- litical issues that will need to be resolved between Israel, Lebanon and Syria in the course of eventual boundary talks are considered. Two of these issues, the village of Ghajar and its relation to the Wazani Springs, and the possibility of groundwater flow from the Litani to the Jordan headwaters, change the fundamental understanding of the relation- ship between hydrologic and political claims, and could threaten the entire approach to water negotiations both between Israel and Syria and between Israel and Lebanon. Fortunately, other agreements within the basin can inform the path solutions here might take. The most critical step towards conflict resolution is separating the concepts of territorial sovereignty from water security. This can be done most effectively by offering joint management, monitoring and enforcement strategies, as well as encouraging greater transparency in water data across boundaries. Introduction Despite the current deadly, and apparently intractable, conflict between Israelis and Arabs, history suggests that peace negotiations will one day resume. When they do, shared water resources will again take centre stage, acting both as an irritant between the parties, and as a tremendous inducement to reach agree- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessing the Judean Desert Caves: Libraries, Archives, Genizas and Hiding Places
    Bulletin of the Anglo-Israel Archaeological Society 2007 Volume 25 Reassessing the Judean Desert Caves: Libraries, Archives, Genizas and Hiding Places STEPHEN PFANN In December 1952, five years after the discovery of Qumran cave 1, Roland de Vaux connected its manuscript remains to the nearby site of Khirbet Qumran when he found one of the unique cylindrical jars, typical of cave 1Q, embedded in the floor of the site. The power of this suggestion was such that, from that point on, as each successive Judean Desert cave containing first-century scrolls was discovered, they, too, were assumed to have originated from the site of Qumran. Even the scrolls discovered at Masada were thought to have arrived there by the hands of Essene refugees. Other researchers have since proposed that certain teachings within the scrolls of Qumran’s caves provide evidence for a sect that does not match that of the Essenes described by first-century writers such as Josephus, Philo and Pliny. These researchers prefer to call this group ‘the Qumran Community’, ‘the Covenanters’, ‘the Yahad ’ or simply ‘sectarians’. The problem is that no single title sufficiently covers the doctrines presented in the scrolls, primarily since there is a clear diversity in doctrine among these scrolls.1 In this article, I would like to present a challenge to this monolithic approach to the understanding of the caves and their scroll collections. This reassessment will be based on a close examination of the material culture of the caves (including ceramics and fabrics) and the palaeographic dating of the scroll collections in individual caves.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Journey… October 19, 2021, Tuesday: USA – Tel Aviv, Israel Depart Our Home City to Tel Aviv
    Why this Pilgrimage to the Holy Land? But to go on a pilgrimage in the Holy Land means setting off and turning the physical journey into a “path of the soul”. Walking on this land with the heart, soul and mind for an encounter: of conversion, of devotion, of listening, with the Eucharist, and with Christ in brothers. John Paul II expressed this in very moving words: “How many memories and images and how much passion and great mystery surround the word Jerusalem! For us as Christians, it represents the geographical point of union between God and men, between eternity and history.” Our Journey… October 19, 2021, Tuesday: USA – Tel Aviv, Israel Depart our home city to Tel Aviv. (In-flight meals) October 20, Wednesday: Arrival to Holy Land and Nahsholim Seaside Resort Arrive in the Holy Land and transfer through the Plain of Sharon and the western coastal cities of Israel to the site of the ancient port city of Dor where the Nahsholim Seaside Resort is located at Kibbutz Nahsholim. After dinner and a brief information meeting, we retire to our cabins on the resort’s private Mediterranean beach. (Nahsholim Seaside Resort; D) October 21, Thursday: Nahsholim (Dor) – Nazareth After breakfast we travel south to Caesarea Maritina archaeological site. Caesarea, a historic seaport and home to the summer palace of Herod the Great built in 22 BC and later home to Pontius Pilate. We continue along the coastal plain to Haifa and up Mount Carmel to the Cave of Elijah below the Stelle Maris Monastery or the Monastery of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, a 19th-century Discalced Carmelite monastery.
    [Show full text]
  • Schechter@35: Living Judaism 4
    “The critical approach, the honest and straightforward study, the intimate atmosphere... that is Schechter.” Itzik Biton “The defining experience is that of being in a place where pluralism “What did Schechter isn't talked about: it's lived.” give me? The ability Liti Golan to read the most beautiful book in the world... in a different way.” Yosef Peleg “The exposure to all kinds of people and a variety of Jewish sources allowed for personal growth and the desire to engage with ideas and people “As a daughter of immigrants different than me.” from Libya, earning this degree is Sigal Aloni a way to connect to the Jewish values that guided my parents, which I am obliged to pass on to my children and grandchildren.” Schechter@35: Tikva Guetta Living Judaism “I acquired Annual Report 2018-2019 a significant and deep foundation in Halakhah and Midrash thanks to the best teachers in the field.” Raanan Malek “When it came to Jewish subjects, I felt like an alien, lost in a foreign city. At Schechter, I fell into a nurturing hothouse, leaving the barren behind, blossoming anew.” Dana Stavi The Schechter Institutes, Inc. • The Schechter Institute of Jewish Studies, the largest M.A. program in is a not for profit 501(c)(3) Jewish Studies in Israel with 400 students and 1756 graduates. organization dedicated to the • The Schechter Rabbinical Seminary is the international rabbinical school advancement of pluralistic of Masorti Judaism, serving Israel, Europe and the Americas. Jewish education. The Schechter Institutes, Inc. provides support • The TALI Education Fund offers a pluralistic Jewish studies program to to four non-profit organizations 65,000 children in over 300 Israeli secular public schools and kindergartens.
    [Show full text]