FUELING up a Look at the Rising Cost of Fuel and Turboprops Make Strong Its Effect on the Industry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FUELING up a Look at the Rising Cost of Fuel and Turboprops Make Strong Its Effect on the Industry A MAGAZINE FOR AIRLINE EXECUTIVES 2007 Issue No. 1 2007 I ssue N o. 1 T a k i n g y o u r a i r l i n e t o n e w h e i g h t s A conversation with Wolfgang Prock-Schauer, the chief executive officer of Jet Airways. Special Section www.sabreairlinesolutions.com I NSIDE FUELING UP A look at the rising cost of fuel and Turboprops make strong its effect on the industry. 6 comeback 1892.7 L 500 gl WestJet saves US$5 million 1514.16 L 400 gl 36 annually 1135.62 L 300 gl 757.08 L 200 gl GOL scores big in Latin 78 America Inc. All rights reserved. and/or service marks of T aking your airline to new heights Holdings Corporation. ©2005 Sabre Airline Solutions logo are trademarks 2007 Issue No. 1 Editors in Chief Stephani Hawkins B. Scott Hunt 3150 Sabre Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 an affiliate of Sabre www.sabreairlinesolutions.com Sabre Airline Solutions and the Sabre Art Direction/Design Charles Urich Design Contributors Erin Jackson, Shari Manning, Tim St. Clair Contributors Teresa Alderink, Umit Cholak, Vinay Dube, Craig Foster, Kristen Fritschel, Carla Jensen, Dana Knight, Ilia Kostov, Srinivas Kothakota, Hanjo Krause, Craig Lindsey, Gordon Locke, Roman Lopatko, Apurva Mathur, Sandra Meekins, Mukundh Parthasarathy, Simone Silveira, Vish Viswanathan, Gabe Werth. Publisher George Lynch Awards 2005 and 2006 International Association of Business Communicators Bronze Quill, Silver Quill and Gold Quill. 2004 International Association of Business Communicators Bronze Quill and Silver Quill. 2004, 2005 and 2006 Awards for Publication Excellence. Reader Inquiries If you have questions about this publication or suggested topics for future articles, please send an e-mail to [email protected]. Address Corrections Please send address corrections via e-mail to [email protected]. Sabre, Sabre Airline Solutions, the Sabre Airline Solutions logo and products noted in italics in this publication are trademarks and/or service marks of an affiliate of Sabre Holdings Corp. All other trademarks, service marks and trade names are the property of their respective owners. ©2007 Sabre Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the USA. marks of an affiliate of Sabre Holdings Corp. ©2007 Sabre Inc. All rights reserved. Sabre Airline Solutions and the Sabre Airline Solutions logo are trademarks and/or service Helping you better market, sell, serve and operate — from planning through execution. We help you plan how to best offer your schedules market to customers and generate the most revenue. • Cargo management • Loyalty management • Revenue • Fares management • Revenue accounting management • Inventory • Revenue integrity • Schedule management management development We help you determine the best distribution channel sell to sell tickets to customers. • Booking engines • Customer relationship • Reservations • Business process management • Shopping management • Market data • Ticketing • Channel distribution and analysis We help you make the experience easier for your serve customers throughout the travel process. • Customer notification and trip information • Customer processing We help you manage daily operations to efficiently operate fly your schedules. • Crew management • Ground support • Resource • Dining and cabin • Maintenance, management services repair and overhaul • Schedule • Flight operations distribution smart. proven. bankable. contents profile industry special section 40 6 30 62 Propped Up Jet Stream Burning Fuel More airlines find value in adding CEO Wolfgang Prock-Schauer Airlines around the world are turboprop aircraft. discusses how Jet Airways has identifying ways to offset the achieved significant success in a rising cost of fuel. 9 Unlocking Hidden short time. Revenues 64 Group traffic generates 36 A Streamlined Approach Saving Fuel additional revenue. to Managing Staff Carriers have numerous options Advanced resource management to minimize fuel usage. 14 technology helps WestJet save The “X” Factor US$5 million annually. 56 Reconnecting with 67 Many airlines looking to “X” Corporate Travelers The Cost of Fuel factors to produce supplemental 40 JetBlue reestablishes Airlines take steps to cope with revenue. Delta’s Turn participation in global distribution high fuel prices. Delta Air Lines is back on the systems to reach corporate 17 Drive for Robustness: road to profitability. travelers. 68 From Optimization to Stretching the Tank Simplcity 43 Air transporters operate more More robust and hybrid airline Hub of Russia effectively to lessen the impact schedule planning is on the KDAvia’s ambitious growth plans of record-high fuel rates. horizon. include building the first true hub in Russia. 20 Winning Customer Relationships 46 Low-cost carriers inspire network Yemenia U-Turn airlines to change their traditional Yemenia implements turnaround perspective methods. plan to improve profits. 25 Traveler of the 50 Future A New Aeroflot New technologies significantly Aeroflot identifies several key enhance the travel experience. objectives to help it remain an industry leader. 28 Excess Baggage 53 Outside entities such as King of Good Times increased security have a A strong technology platform powerful effect on airline supports Kingfisher Airlines’ operations. desire for unmatched guest services. 6 t wouldn’t seem one cent would have much of an effect on a US$450 billion a year industry. But, in air transportation, where the difference between profit I and loss can seem thinner than the air at 30,000 feet, one penny can have a dramatic impact. Take the cost of fuel. Each penny swing in the cost of a gallon of jet fuel results in an increase or decrease of about US$550 million for the industry. As part of our first special section, we discuss fuel and how to maximize it. But, the issue of fuel consumption involves so much more than just costs. In today’s environment — pun intended — pressure is growing for airlines to operate more “green” by reducing their carbon emissions. Of course, there are incen- tives for airlines to become more environmentally conscious, ascend contents 82 regional products company 70 76 80 Taking It Online. Off the Mainframe One Stop Carriers increase online sales by North American carriers reap A single IT provider promotes partnering with Travelocity. benefits from solutions built on software integration, streamlined open-systems technology. training and improved 72 Right Offer, Right Person, productivity. Right Time 78 Behavioral targeting tools help Scoring a GOL 82 airlines better use travel agents GOL becomes one of Latin Legendary Quality to attain prospective customers. America’s leading airlines in a The highest levels of quality little more than five years. guarantee customer satisfaction 74 and repeat business. “Cashe”ing Out New functionality in the 78 Sabre GDS provides accurate availability responses in a high- volume transaction processing environment. with Tom Klein Group President, Sabre Airline Solutions/Sabre Travel Network not the least of which is reduced costs. But the push for more ing sustainability practices, cutting toxic emissions, engaging in charitable green operations will likely have other far-reaching implications. activities, developing products that are environmentally safe. It’s something The Kyoto Protocol requires developed countries to reduce that we at Sabre Holdings have adopted — our headquarters building in emissions by an average of 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. Texas, for example, has been recognized by the U.S. Green Building Council And although the air transportation industry currently produces only for leadership in energy and environmental design. Our sister company, 2 percent to 3 percent of the world’s carbon output, more atten- Travelocity, was the first major online agency to give travelers the option tion is being focused on our industry and its impact on the environ- to purchase “carbon offsets” when booking their vacation travel. The ment. Even with improvements in fuel efficiency, emissions from Sabre Travel Network® business has developed a product that enables international aviation increased 70 percent between 1990 and 2002. business travel agencies in Europe to produce reports for their corporate There have been some encouraging recent developments that customers about the environmental impact of the flights they are booking. could help reduce aviation’s emissions. Last year, for example, the U.S. Sustainability programs are becoming seen not only as Air Force began testing a synthetic jet fuel that burns with less pollution good will but good business. Companies benefit from choosing than regular jet fuel. So far, the tests have indicated the synthetic fuel, vendors with sustainability programs. An article in BusinessWeek made from natural gas, offers identical performance to traditional JP-8 fuel. noted that companies that embrace sustainability “help avert Such developments will help meet the need to be costly setbacks from environmental disasters, political protests and more green. More travelers are looking to counter their carbon out- human-rights or workplace abuses.” In other words, companies put, choosing airlines that have offset programs, which invest in envi- that practice sustainability are more reliable and stable long term. ronmentally friendly activities such as planting trees or develop- But, of course, environmental issues are not the only thing on ing renewable sources of energy. And more governments are likely to the radar screen of airlines. In our industry, the focus changes daily, and follow the lead of the European Union in regulating carbon emissions. issues that sat on the backburner for months can quickly become top pri- In December, the European Union added air transportation to ority. In this issue, we cover a range of issues currently facing our industry. its emissions trading scheme, which will cause airlines flying to, from or It’s certainly an interesting time to be in air trans- within the union to meet emissions targets. Although the move has proven portation. We hope you enjoy this issue, and we look for- controversial, it likely is just the first step. In February, the International Civil ward to visiting with you again in the coming months.
Recommended publications
  • FOOD SAFETY in AVIATION Presented by Brig Gen(Retd) Md Abdur Rab Miah
    WELCOME TO CAA, BANGLADESH DECRALATION OF WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY In 1974, the 27th world health Assembly stressed, “ the need for each member state to shoulder the responsibilities for the Safety of food Wat e r , and proper handling of waste disposal in international traffic.” FOOD SAFETY IN AVIATION Presented by Brig Gen(Retd) Md Abdur Rab Miah CAPSCA Focal Person & Aviation Public Health Inspector and consultant Civil Aviation Authority, Bangladesh POINTS OF DISCUSSION Introduction Standards of Flight catering Premises Water Supply Storage of Food Food Handlers Food Preparation Staff Cloakroom Crew Meals Transportation of food to the aircraft Waste Disposal Flight Catering Laboratory Flight Catering Inspection , Conclusion INTRODUCTION Food safety in Aviation ensures hygiene, wholesomeness and soundness of food from its production to its final consumption by the passengers and crew. So, the air operators are to provide contaminants free ,hygienic , safe, attractive, palatable and high quality food to the consumers. Because the passengers assess an airline by the quality of the meals it serves on board. STANDARD OF FLT CAT PREMISES 1) Flight catering premises - spacious (2) Protection against rodents & insects 3) Lighting and ventilation (4) Located at or in the vicinity of airport 5) No projections or ledges on the wall (6) Floor- smooth but not slippery (7) Walls to be tiles fitted with min partition (8) or, Washable/Glossy paint PROTECTION AGAINST INSECTS & RODENTS All doors, windows and other openings should be insect-proof • Plastic insect-proof screening is recommended Kitchen entrances should have self-closing, double doors, opening outwards. EXCLUSION OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS Dogs, cats and other domestic animals should be excluded from all parts of the food premises.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabin Crew Safety January-February 2000
    F L I G H T S A F E T Y F O U N D A T I O N CABIN CREW SAFETY Vol. 35 No. 1 For Everyone Concerned with the Safety of Flight January–February 2000 Working in, Around Aircraft Cabins Requires Awareness of Fall Prevention The availability of limited data on slips, trips and falls during normal aircraft operations complicates efforts to improve the prevention of injury to crewmembers and passengers in the cabin environment. Nevertheless, airlines periodically should review fall-prevention strategies and related training of flight attendants and other workers. FSF Editorial Staff In most contexts, being injured by a fall simply study by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics said means that the force of gravity caused a person’s that falls were the most common “injury and downward motion and injury occurred when illness cases by event or exposure” for pilots, most the moving person suddenly decelerated by striking involving walkways, stairs and vehicles. Falls were a surface or an object. When aircraft are in flight the third most common such event for flight or in motion on the ground, a variety of factors attendants, most involving walkways and stairs.1 can contribute to falls. For example, accident/ incident reports have identified factors such as In the early 1990s, researchers attempting to study turbulence, autopilot malfunctions, aircraft fatal falls in the workplace encountered difficulty upsets, sudden evasive maneuvers by flight crews, identifying such occurrences in most industries.2 aircraft collisions with airport structures, collisions Researchers have found that the available data do between ground vehicles and aircraft, and sudden not specify the circumstances for a large proportion braking while a flight crew is taxiing the of falls.3 Similarly, little public data and few studies aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Accident Report: American Airlines, Inc., Mcdonnell Douglas
    Explosive decompression, American Airlines, Inc., McDonnell Douglas DC-10-10, N103AA, Near Windsor, Ontario, Canada, June 12, 1972 Micro-summary: On climb, this McDonnell Douglas DC-10-10 experienced an opening of a cargo door, explosive decompression, and a main cabin floor collapse, disrupting the flight control system. Event Date: 1972-06-12 at 1925 EST Investigative Body: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), USA Investigative Body's Web Site: http://www.ntsb.gov/ Cautions: 1. Accident reports can be and sometimes are revised. Be sure to consult the investigative agency for the latest version before basing anything significant on content (e.g., thesis, research, etc). 2. Readers are advised that each report is a glimpse of events at specific points in time. While broad themes permeate the causal events leading up to crashes, and we can learn from those, the specific regulatory and technological environments can and do change. Your company's flight operations manual is the final authority as to the safe operation of your aircraft! 3. Reports may or may not represent reality. Many many non-scientific factors go into an investigation, including the magnitude of the event, the experience of the investigator, the political climate, relationship with the regulatory authority, technological and recovery capabilities, etc. It is recommended that the reader review all reports analytically. Even a "bad" report can be a very useful launching point for learning. 4. Contact us before reproducing or redistributing a report from this anthology. Individual countries have very differing views on copyright! We can advise you on the steps to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Fuselage Design
    6 - 1 6 Fuselage design In conventional aircraft the fuselage serves to accommodate the payload. The wings are used to store fuel and are therefore not available to accommodate the payload. The payload of civil aircraft can consist of passengers, baggage and cargo. The passengers are accommodated in the cabin and the cargo in the cargo compartment. Large items of baggage are also stored in the cargo compartment, whereas smaller items are taken into the cabin as carry-on baggage and stowed away in overhead stowage compartments above the seats. The cockpit and key aircraft systems are also located in the fuselage. 6.1 Fuselage cross-section and cargo compartment Today’s passenger aircraft have a constant fuselage cross-section in the central section. This design reduces the production costs (same frames; simply instead of doubly curved surfaces, i.e. a sheet of metal can be unwound over the fuselage) and makes it possible to construct aircraft variants with a lengthened or shortened fuselage. In this section we are going to examine the cross-section of this central fuselage section. In order to accommodate a specific number of passengers, the fuselage can be long and narrow or, conversely, short and wide. As the fuselage contributes approximately 25% to 50 % of an aircraft's total drag, it is especially important to ensure that it has a low-drag shape. A fuselage 1 fineness ratio ldFF/ of approximately 6 provides the smallest tube drag . However, as a longer fuselage leads to a longer tail lever arm, and therefore to smaller empennages and lower tail drag, a fineness ratio of 8 is seen as the ideal according to [ROSKAM III].
    [Show full text]
  • Cabin Safety Subject Index
    Cabin Safety Subject Index This document is prepared as part of the FAA Flight Standards Cabin Safety Inspector Program. For additional information about this document or the program contact: Donald Wecklein Pacific Certificate Management Office 7181 Amigo Street Las Vegas, NV 89119 [email protected] Jump to Table of Contents Rev. 43 Get familiar with the Cabin Safety Subject Index The Cabin Safety Subject Index (CSSI) is a reference guide to Federal Regulations, FAA Orders, Advisory Circulars, Information for Operators (InFO), Safety Alerts for Operators (SAFO), legal interpretations, and other FAA related content related to cabin safety. Subscribe to updates If you would like to receive updates to the Cabin Safety Subject Index whenever it’s revised, click here: I want to subscribe and receive updates. This is a free service. You will receive an automated response acknowledging your request. You may unsubscribe at any time. Getting around within the CSSI The CSSI structure is arranged in alphabetical order by subject, and the document has direct links to the subject matter, as well as links within the document for ease of navigation. The Table of Contents contains a hyperlinked list of all subjects covered within the CSSI. • Clicking the topic brings you to the desired subject. • Clicking the subject brings you back to the Table of Contents. • Next to some subjects you will see (also see xxxxxxxx). These are related subjects. Click on the “also see” subject and it will bring you directly to that subject. • Clicking on hyperlinked content will bring you directly to the desired content.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article
    A compre hensive systems-level approach in cabin design minimizes fire potential and helps ensure passenger safety. 18 AERO QUARTERLY QTR_04 | 11 Fire Protection: Passenger Cabin The cabins on all Boeing airplanes incorporate comprehensive fire-protective features and materials to minimize the potential for a fire and help ensure the safety of passengers. By Arthur L. Tutson, Boeing Organization Designation Authorization, Authorized Representative, Fire Protection; Douglas E. Ferguson, Technical Safety Chief, Fire Protection, Technical Services and modifications; and Mike Madden, Deputy Pressurized Compartment Fire Marshal, Payloads Design This article is the third in a series exploring approach that goes beyond ensuring This article describes how Boeing the implementation of fire protection on individual parts meet fire property require- incorporates fire protection features and transport category airplanes. ments by looking at the integration of all materials into the airplane cabin that meet those parts on the airplane. This approach or exceed fire protection standards defined Two types of fires can affect an airplane uses the principles of material selection, by U.S. Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR). and its occupants: in-flight and post-crash. separation, isolation, detection, and control. an in-flight fire usually occurs as a result of These principles involve separating the a system or component failure or mainte- FIRE-PROTECTIVE MATERIALS three contributory factors to a fire (fuel, nance issue. A post-crash fire usually ignition source, and oxygen), isolating results from ignition of fuel released during Most materials used in the construction potential fires from spreading to other parts a crash landing. Boeing considers both of passenger compartment interiors are of the airplane, and controlling a fire should types of fires when designing for airplane required by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • American Airlines
    AMERICAN AIRLINES FLIGHT ATTENDANT AGREEMENT Between AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and THE ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FLIGHT ATTENDANTS DECEMBER 13, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Recognition and Scope .......................................... 1-1 Section 2 Definitions………………………………………..2-1 Section 3 Compensation ........................................................ 3-1 Section 4 Expenses ................................................................ 4-1 Section 5 Moving Expenses .................................................. 5-1 Section 6 Crew Accommodations ........................................ 6-1 Section 7 Uniforms ............................................................... 7-1 Section 8 Vacation ............................................................... 8-1 Section 9 Sick Leave ............................................................ 9-1 Section 10 Scheduling .......................................................... 10-1 Section 11 Hours of Service ................................................. 11-1 Section 12 Reserve Duty ...................................................... 12-1 Section 13 Temporary Duty Assignment (TDY) .................. 13-1 Section 14 International Flying ............................................ 14-1 Section 15 Foreign Language Speaker ................................. 15-1 Section 16 Deadheading ....................................................... 16-1 Section 17 Co-Terminals ...................................................... 17-1 Section 18 Charters ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The American Airlines Bankruptcy
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies College of Law Student Work 4-28-2017 How to Get Away with Merger: The American Airlines Bankruptcy Kelsey Cunningham Osborne Christopher K. Coleman Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_studlawbankruptcy Part of the Bankruptcy Law Commons Recommended Citation Cunningham Osborne, Kelsey and Coleman, Christopher K., "How to Get Away with Merger: The American Airlines Bankruptcy" (2017). Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_studlawbankruptcy/46 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law Student Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How To Get Away with Merger: The American Airlines Bankruptcy By: Kelsey Cunningham Osborne & Christopher K. Coleman Table of Contents Cast of Characters ...................................................................................................... 4 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6 II. The Debtor’s Business .......................................................................................... 7 III. Events Leading to Filing for Chapter 11 .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board
    b NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM FLIGHT 901 McDONNELL DOUGLAS DC- 10-30 JOHN F. KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT JAMAICA, NEW YORK FEBRUARY 28, 1984 NTSB/AAR-84/ 15 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT NTSB/AkR-84/15 PB84-910415 4. Ti t le end Subt i t le Aircraft Accident Report-- 5.Report Date Scandinavian Airlines System Flight 901 MdDonnell Douglas November 15, 1984 DC-10-3d Norwegian Registry LN-RKB John F. Kennedy Inter- 6.Performi ng Organization national Aimort Jamaica. New York, Februarv 28. 1984 Code 7. Author(s) 8.Performing Organization Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board 3894-A Bureau of Accident Investigation 11.Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 1 13.Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsdring Agency Name and Address Aircraft Accident Report February 28, 1984 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1 .Sponsoring Agency Code 1 15.Supplementary Notes 1.8bstract On February 28, 1984, Scandinavian Airlines System Flight 901, a McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30, was a regularly scheduled international passenger flight from Stockholm, Sweden, to New York City, New York, with an en route stop at Oslo, Norway. Following an approach to runway 4 right at New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport, the airplane touched down about 4,700 ft (1,440 meters) beyond the threshold of the 8,400-foot (2,560-meter) runway and could not be stopped on the runway. The airplane was steered to the right to avoid the approach light pier at the departure end of the runway and came to rest in Thurston Basin, a tidal waterway located about 600 ft from the departure end of runway 4R.
    [Show full text]
  • FDA Could Better Communicate with Airlines to Encourage Voluntary Construction Inspections of Aircraft Galleys and Lavatories
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees September 2020 AVIATION SANITATION FDA Could Better Communicate with Airlines to Encourage Voluntary Construction Inspections of Aircraft Galleys and Lavatories GAO-20-612 September 2020 AVIATION SANITATION FDA Could Better Communicate with Airlines to Encourage Voluntary Construction Inspections of Highlights of GAO-20-612, a report to Aircraft Galleys and Lavatories congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Voluntary construction inspections are Most commercial aircraft undergo voluntary inspections to ensure that galleys the primary mechanism by which FDA and lavatories are constructed and assembled to meet the Food and Drug oversees compliance with its required Administration’s (FDA) sanitation standards, according to industry sanitation standards for the representatives. Twenty-seven percent of the inspections FDA conducted construction of aircraft galleys and between fiscal years 2015 and 2019 found objectionable conditions. But in nearly lavatories. all of these instances, the conditions identified, such as the need for additional A report accompanying the House sealant in areas where there was a gap or seam, were corrected by the airline or 2019 Agriculture, Rural Development, aircraft manufacturer during the inspection. However, some regional airline Food and Drug Administration, and representatives told GAO that their aircraft do not receive these construction Related Agencies Appropriations bill inspections, either because larger airlines with which they have contracts told included a provision for GAO to review them the inspections were unnecessary or because they did not believe the FDA’s process for ensuring proper inspections were relevant to them. FDA provides these inspections free of sanitation in aircraft galleys and charge, upon request of aircraft manufacturers or airlines, and aircraft passing lavatories.
    [Show full text]
  • 1995 Gulfstream GIVSP S/N 1262 (N432HC)
    1995 Gulfstream GIVSP s/n 1262 (N432HC) Specifications subject to verification upon inspection and 35 Waterview Blvd. 2nd FL. Parsippany, NJ 07054 aircraft is subject to prior sale or withdrawal from the market. [email protected] | 201.891.0881 | LEAS.COM 1995 Gulfstream GIVSP s/n 1262 Airframe: 15,651 Hours 7,582 Landings Date of Manufacture (CofA): March 1995 Entry into Service: December 1995 Engines: Rolls-Royce TAY 611-8 (MSG-3) Engines are Hard-Time & Enrolled on Rolls-Royce CorporateCare Left (Eng #1): S/N: 16663 15,002 Eng. Hrs. Since New 7,280 Eng. Cycles Mid-Life c/w May 2019 at 14,654 Hrs. & 7,136 Cycles (348 Hrs TSMLI) Overhaul c/w May 2019 at 14,654 Hrs. & 7,136 Cycles (348 Hrs TSOH) Right (Eng #2): S/N: 16664 15,054 Eng. Hrs. Since New 7,309 Eng. Cycles Mid-Life c/w May 2019 at 14,707 Hrs. & 7,165 Cycles (348 Hrs TSMLI) Overhaul c/w May 2019 at 14,707 Hrs. & 7,165 Cycles (348 Hrs TSOH) APU: Enrolled on MSP & On Condition GTCP36-150G S/N: P-789C 9,323 Hrs 1995 Gulfstream GIVSP s/n 1262 Avionics: Honeywell 6-Tube EFIS Enrolled on Honeywell HAPP Dual Honeywell SPZ-8400 Digital Auto Pilot Dual Honeywell FZ-820 Flight Guidance Computers Dual Honeywell NZ-2010 LR NAV/FMS w/ 6.1 Software Dual Collins VHF-422B COMM (8.33 Spacing) Dual Collins VIR-432 NAV w/ FM Immunity Dual Collins ADF-462 Dual Collins DME-442 Dual Honeywell AA-300 Radio Altimeter Dual Collins HF-9000 w/ Selcal HF COMM Honeywell Primus 870 Weather Radar Dorne & Margolin ELT Dual Honeywell 12-Channel GPS Dual Collins TDR-94D Mode S Transponder w/ Flight ID &
    [Show full text]
  • Basics of the Aircraft Cabin Environment Enable a Hygienic Environment and Contaminant Control
    Use Tab 'Insert - Header & Footer' for Presentation Title - Siglum - Reference Month 200X CAPSCA-Europe Meeting, Bern 18-21 June 2013 Basics of the aircraft cabin environment Enable a hygienic environment and contaminant control Presented by Dr Joerg CREMERS from Airbus Operations GmbH Expert Cabin Aeromedicine, Health & Comfort Overview Cabin Environment in relation to Hygiene Cabin Environment Air Supply Water/Waste Galley/Food System Potable water System Design & architecture supply Interfaces Contamination Food cooling control Waste water requirements & technologies Disposal Pandemics Page 2 © AIRBUS Operations GmbH. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Air Supply System Architecture The Air supply system has three main functions: supply air and pollutant removal; pressurization of the aircraft; temperature control and cooling of technical equipment Page 3 © AIRBUS Operations GmbH. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Air Purity and Contaminant Control Outside air Ozone (during cruise) VOC Odours (during ground operation) Converter + Catalytic converters for depletion of Ozone / VOC Ozone Pathogens outside air: adiabatic compression in engine Remover Pure Air Pure Pathogens inside: HEPA filters, also odours PACKs = Conditioned, filtered, pure air = Passenger well-being Air conditioning HEPA* Particles free Gaseous** Cabin air no odour Filter air Filter * HEPA : High Efficiency Particulate Air filter * VOC : Volatile Organic Compounds; ** Option on A330/A340 only Page 4 © AIRBUS Operations GmbH. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Use Tab 'Insert - Header & Footer' for Presentation Title - Siglum - Reference Air Ventilation aspects in Relation to Pandemics Risk of virus transmission is minimized by avoiding longitudinal flow, use of HEPA filters, low humidity of cabin air (5-15 %). Studies [1], [2] indicate that proximity, specifically in the few rows in front of the index case, is a major factor in the transmission.
    [Show full text]