Air and Space Power Journal, Published Quarterly, Is the Professional Flagship Publication of the United States Air Force

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Air and Space Power Journal, Published Quarterly, Is the Professional Flagship Publication of the United States Air Force Distribution A: Approved for Public Release Chief of Staff, US Air Force Gen John P. Jumper Commander, Air Education and Training Command Gen Donald G. Cook http://www.af.mil Commander, Air University Lt Gen John F. Regni Commander, College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education Col David S. Fadok Editor Lt Col Paul D. Berg http://www.aetc.randolph.af.mil Senior Editor Lt Col Malcolm D. Grimes Associate Editor Maj Donald R. Ferguson Editor and Military Defense Analyst Col Larry Carter, USAF, Retired Professional Staff Marvin W. Bassett, Contributing Editor http://www.au.af.mil Philip S. Adkins, Contributing Editor Mary J. Moore, Editorial Assistant Debbie Banker, Editorial Assistant Steven C. Garst, Director of Art and Production Daniel M. Armstrong, Illustrator L. Susan Fair, Illustrator Ann Bailey, Prepress Production Manager Air and Space Power Chronicles Luetwinder T. Eaves, Managing Editor http://www.cadre.maxwell.af.mil The Air and Space Power Journal, published quarterly, is the professional flagship publication of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for the presentation and stimulation of innova­ tive thinking on military doctrine, strategy, tactics, force structure, readiness, and other matters of na­ tional defense. The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanc­ tion of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or Visit Air and Space Power Journal online in part without permission. If they are reproduced, at http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil the Air and Space Power Journal requests a courtesy line. or e-mail to [email protected] Image of Jaguar aircraft on back cover reproduced by permission, Crown Copyright. Winter 2004 Volume XVIII, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective Past Trends and Future Plans . 6 Lt Gen Duncan J. McNabb, USAF Dr. Christopher J. Bowie Features The Tale of the C/JFACC: A Long and Winding Road . 18 Dr. Stephen O. Fought Aspects of Anglo-US Co-operation in the Air in the First World War . 27 Sebastian Cox Air Lines: Anglo-American Tactical Air Operations in World War II . 34 Dr. Thomas Alexander Hughes Anglo-American Strategic Air Power Co-operation in the Cold War and Beyond . 50 Group Capt Christopher Finn, RAF Lt Col Paul D. Berg, USAF British Commonwealth Carrier Operations in the Korean War . 62 Cdr David Hobbs, MBE, RN Post–Cold War Development of United Kingdom Joint Air Command and Control Capability . 74 Wing Cdr Redvers T. N. Thompson, RAF Operation Iraqi Freedom: Coalition Operations . 87 Squadron Leader Sophy Gardner, RAF Dynamic Followership: The Prerequisite for Effective Leadership . 102 Lt Col Sharon M. Latour, USAF Lt Col Vicki J. Rast, USAF Departments Prelaunch Notes Introducing the Arabic ASPJ . 10 Flight Lines British-American Cooperation in Airpower and Space Power . 11 Ricochets and Replies . 12 Vortices The Current Battle Damage Assessment Paradigm Is Obsolete . 13 Lt Col Hugh Curry, USAF PIREP The British American Forces Dining Club . 46 Col Larry G. Carter, USAF, Retired Doctrine NOTAMs Joint Publication 3-16, Joint Doctrine for Multinational Operations “If You Work with Friends, Bring It Along!” . 72 Lt Col Malcolm D. Grimes, USAF Maj Donald R. Ferguson, USAF New USAF Doctrine Publication: AFDD 2-2.1, Counterspace Operations . 100 Lt Col Paula B. Flavell, USAF Net Assessment Strategic Air Power in Desert Storm . 111 John Andreas Olsen Reviewer: Group Capt Chris Finn, RAF Tedder: Quietly in Command . 112 Vincent Orange Reviewer: Sebastian Ritchie Surprise, Security, and the American Experience . 113 John Lewis Gaddis Reviewer: Col Richard Szafranski, USAF, Retired The Iraq War: A Military History . 114 Williamson Murray and Maj Gen Robert H. Scales Jr. Reviewer: Col (sel) Merrick E. Krause, USAF Airpower Advantage: Planning the Gulf War Air Campaign, 1989–1991 . 116 Diane T. Putney Reviewer: Maj Gen David A. Deptula, USAF The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States . 117 Reviewer: Col (sel) Merrick E. Krause, USAF C3: Nuclear Command, Control Cooperation . 119 Valery E. Yarynich Reviewer: Capt Gilles Van Nederveen, USAF, Retired The Road to Rainbow: Army Planning for Global War, 1934–1940 . 120 Henry G. Gole Reviewer: Dr. David R. Mets Fixing Intelligence: For a More Secure America . 121 Lt Gen William E. Odom, USA, Retired Reviewer: Maj Gary Pounder, USAF, Retired Mission Debrief . 125 Air and Space Power Journal Board of Reviewers Prof. Tami Davis Biddle Lt Col Merrick E. Krause US Army War College Special Assistant to the Chairman Lt Col Price T. Bingham, USAF, Retired Joint Chiefs of Staff Melbourne, Florida Dr. Charles Krupnick Dr. Kendall K. Brown US Army War College NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Dr. Benjamin S. Lambeth RAND Brig Gen Phillip D. Caine, USAF, Retired Monument, Colorado Lt Col David MacIsaac, USAF, Retired Montgomery, Alabama Dr. Clayton K. S. Chun US Army War College Dr. Karl P. Magyar Montgomery, Alabama Dr. Mark Clodfelter National War College Col Edward Mann, USAF, Retired Colorado Springs, Colorado Dr. James Corum USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Dr. Jerome V. Martin Command Historian Dr. Conrad Crane Headquarters US Strategic Command Director, US Army Military Studies Institute Col Phillip Meilinger, USAF, Retired Dr. Dik A. Daso Northrop Grumman Corporation National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Prof. John H. Morrow Jr. University of Georgia Dr. William L. Dowdy Dr. Daniel Mortensen Alabama State University USAF College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research Col Dennis M. Drew, USAF, Retired and Education USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Prof. James Mowbray Brig Gen Charles Dunlap Jr., USAF USAF Air War College Staff Judge Advocate Dr. Karl Mueller USAF Air Combat Command RAND Dr. Stephen Fought Dr. Richard R. Muller USAF Air War College USAF Air Command and Staff College Col David M. Glantz, USA, Retired Col Robert Owen, USAF, Retired Journal of Slavic Military Studies Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Col Thomas E. Griffith Jr., USAF Dr. Reina J. Pennington USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Norwich University Dr. John F. Guilmartin Jr. Lt Col Thomas R. Searle Ohio State University Headquarters US Special Operations Command Dr. Grant T. Hammond Dr. James Smith Center for Strategy and Technology USAF Institute for National Security Studies Air University Col James Spencer, USAF, Retired Prof. Daniel Hughes USAF Academy USAF Air War College Col Richard Szafranski, USAF, Retired Dr. Thomas Hughes Toffler Associates USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Dr. James Titus Col Mark P. Jelonek, USAF USAF Academy Commander, 614th Space Operations Group Director of Operations, Fourteenth Air Force Col Mark Wells, USAF USAF Academy Dr. Tom Keaney School of Advanced International Studies Dr. Kenneth P. Werrell Johns Hopkins University Christiansburg, Virginia Prof. Theodore Kluz Dr. Harold R. Winton USAF Air War College USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies 3 Foreword Last year the RAF and the US Air Force were once again side by side over the skies of Iraq. During 21 days of combat, we demonstrated the power of organized and integrated air and space forces in joint and coalition warfare. We did not do it alone, but we contributed more than our fair share to enable the rapid success of ground forces. At the same time, we were able to join with our special operations forces—air and land—to keep activity in western Iraq from interfering with the main effort. In close coordination with ground forces, air- power prevented enemy attempts to mount coordinated or coherent resistance. These efforts on the part of coalition Airmen were largely outside the media spotlight and beyond public recognition. But make no mistake; our Airmen were key to the swift and overwhelming military victory. What made it work, and what must we do to get better? We can point to three major leveraging capabilities. First, we must make integration work. Integration is more than being “net-centric” or a “common operat­ ing picture” or “information sharing.” It’s about the ability of machines to direct the Gen John P. Jumper activities of other machines to produce Chief of Staff rapid target location and identification. We United States Air Force are far from having this right, but we did make tremendous progress during the dust storm in Operation Iraqi Freedom, where traditional stand-alone platforms—manned, unmanned, and space—were lashed to­ gether in a real-time network that located and destroyed Iraqi forces moving to rein­ force depleted Republican Guard divisions. Second is our growing ability to predict and persist. We are at the infant stages of prediction, but better tools will produce 4 the “battlefield forensics” for us to analyze patterns and draw logical conclusions about enemy options. Persistence is a tremendous leveraging capability. The evolution of re­ motely piloted and unmanned vehicles will give us 24-hour persistence to stare at an area and study patterns of activity, as well as deliver precise target location and identifi­ cation to manned aircraft. Our third com­ petitive advantage is our people and our training. Fifty years of NATO interoper­ ability and bilateral advanced training have allowed us to minimize the nagging barri­ ers to communications, terminology, and basic airmanship. Fourteen years of contin­ gency operations have kept our skills fresh, our tactics current, and our mutual respect strong. Bonds between the Royal Air Force and the United States Air Force have never been stronger. Especially in the past 14 years, we have shared the skies during all major con­ tingency operations.
Recommended publications
  • Hms Warrior - Ironclad Pdf
    FREE HMS WARRIOR - IRONCLAD PDF Wynford Davies | 128 pages | 15 Nov 2011 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781848320956 | English | Barnsley, United Kingdom HMS Warrior | Museum Ship & Venue | Portsmouth, Hampshir The Warrior -class ironclads were a class of two warships built for the Royal Navy between andthe first ocean-going ironclads with iron hulls ever constructed. They were initially armed with a mix of rifled breech-loading and muzzle-loading smoothbore guns, but the Armstrong breech-loading guns proved unreliable and were ultimately withdrawn from service. The ships spent their first commission with the Channel Fleet before being rearmed with new rifled muzzle-loading guns in the late s. Warrior rejoined the Channel Fleet after her refit while Black Prince joined the 1st Class Reserve and joined the fleet during its annual manoeuvres. The HMS Warrior - Ironclad ships exchanged roles after another refit in the mids. Both ships spent most of the last two decades of the 19th century in reserve. Warrior was hulked in and survived to be restored in as a museum ship. Black Prince became a training ship in and was hulked in before being sold for scrap in The Warrior -class ships have been described as revolutionary, but in truth they were more evolutionary than not as everything HMS Warrior - Ironclad their wrought iron armour had been in use by ocean-going ships for years. Brown commented, "What made [Warrior] truly novel was the way in which these individual aspects were blended together, making her the biggest and most powerful warship in the world. They were designed by Chief Constructor of the Navy Isaac Watts as gun armoured frigates largely based on the fine lines of the large frigate Mersey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Semaphore Circular No 659 the Beating Heart of the RNA May 2016
    The Semaphore Circular No 659 The Beating Heart of the RNA May 2016 HMS Mersey alongside in Antigua where she is currently the West Indies Guardship. The photo is courtesy of NCM 6 Shipmate Keith Ridley who was hanging around hoping for an invitation on board!!! This edition is the first on-line version of the Semaphore Circular, unless you have registered with Central Office, it will only be available on the RNA website in the ‘Members Area’ under ‘downloads’ at www.royal-naval-association.co.uk and will be emailed to the branch contact, usually the Hon Sec. 1 Daily Orders 1. April Open Day 2. New Insurance Credits 3. Blonde Joke 4. Service Deferred Pensions 5. Guess Where? 6. Donations 7. HMS Raleigh Open Day 8. Finance Corner 9. RN VC Series – T/Lt Thomas Wilkinson 10. Golf Joke 11. Book Review 12. Operation Neptune – Book Review 13. Aussie Trucker and Emu Joke 14. Legion D’Honneur 15. Covenant Fund 16. Coleman/Ansvar Insurance 17. RNPLS and Yard M/Sweepers 18. Ton Class Association Film 19. What’s the difference Joke 20. Naval Interest Groups Escorted Tours 21. RNRMC Donation 22. B of J - Paterdale 23. Smallie Joke 24. Supporting Seafarers Day Longcast “D’ye hear there” (Branch news) Crossed the Bar – Celebrating a life well lived RNA Benefits Page Shortcast Swinging the Lamp Forms Glossary of terms NCM National Council Member NC National Council AMC Association Management Committee FAC Finance Administration Committee NCh National Chairman NVCh National Vice Chairman NP National President DNP Deputy National President GS General
    [Show full text]
  • The British Commonwealth and Allied Naval Forces' Operation with the Anti
    THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH AND ALLIED NAVAL FORCES’ OPERATION WITH THE ANTI-COMMUNIST GUERRILLAS IN THE KOREAN WAR: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE OPERATION ON THE WEST COAST By INSEUNG KIM A dissertation submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham May 2018 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the British Commonwealth and Allied Naval forces operation on the west coast during the final two and a half years of the Korean War, particularly focused on their co- operation with the anti-Communist guerrillas. The purpose of this study is to present a more realistic picture of the United Nations (UN) naval forces operation in the west, which has been largely neglected, by analysing their activities in relation to the large number of irregular forces. This thesis shows that, even though it was often difficult and frustrating, working with the irregular groups was both strategically and operationally essential to the conduct of the war, and this naval-guerrilla relationship was of major importance during the latter part of the naval campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Education and the Transformation of the Canadian Forces Canadian Forces Transformation
    Painting by Giovanni Domenico Tieopolo, National Gallery, London National Gallery, Tieopolo, Painting by Giovanni Domenico The Procession of the Trojan Horse in Troy. MILITARY EDUCATION AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE CANADIAN FORCES CANADIAN FORCES TRANSFORMATION by Peter Foot stonishingly, nothing said in the Defence Historically, CFC has not always been amenable to rapid Policy Statement issued in April 2005, change. As is usually the case when managing change in any and very little said since, refers to institution, opinions and policy can adapt easily to a new professional military education in Canada. situation, but culture, attitudes and application tend to take No guidance is given directly about what longer. This institutional lag has received aggressive attention: Ais required to change in terms of training and education in course development and balance, together with delivery order to facilitate and sustain the Transformation of methods and student assessment, all involving the role of the the Canadian Forces (CF). More or less everything has permanent teaching staff – these are the focus for redesign. to be inferred from the International Policy Statements It is certainly not corporate restructuring for its own sake. taken as a whole, together with the implications of Transformation developments themselves, plus indications However, the reasons for an accelerated impulse for given by Chief of the Defence Staff General Rick Hillier change ought not to obscure those previous, mostly in his near-constant round of speeches.1 For the Canadian responsible inhibitions against change in the past. The root Forces College (CFC), the challenge is to accept these causes of the lag in implementing or accepting cultural implications and indications as defining its contribution change at CFC are understandable and often honourable.
    [Show full text]
  • Westland Wessex
    This article is taken from Wikipedia Westland Wessex This article is about the helicopter. For the fixed-wing for rapid starting and thus faster response times.[1] The aircraft, see Westland IV. Wessex could also operate in a wide range of weather conditions as well as at night, partly due to its use of an automatic pilot system. These same qualities that made The Westland Wessex is a British-built turbine-powered the Wessex well-suited to the anti-submarine role also development of the Sikorsky H-34, it was developed lent themselves to the search and rescue (SAR) mission, and produced under license by Westland Aircraft (later which the type would become heavily used for.[1] Westland Helicopters). One of the main changes from Sikorsky’s H-34 was the replacement of the piston-engine powerplant with a turboshaft engine; the Wessex was the first helicopter in the world to be produced in large num- bers that made use of a gas turbine propulsion system.[1] Early models were powered by a single Napier Gazelle engine, later builds used a pair of Rolls-Royce Gnome engines. The Wessex was initially produced for the Royal Navy (RN) and later for the Royal Air Force (RAF); a limited number of civilian aircraft were also produced, as well as some export sales. The Wessex operated as an anti- submarine warfare and utility helicopter; it is perhaps best recognised for its use as a search and rescue (SAR) he- licopter. The type entered operational service in 1961, A pair of Royal Navy Wessex helicopters in the flight deck of the and had a service life in excess of 40 years before being HMS Intrepid, 1968 retired in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Master Narrative Ours Is the Epic Story of the Royal Navy, Its Impact on Britain and the World from Its Origins in 625 A.D
    NMRN Master Narrative Ours is the epic story of the Royal Navy, its impact on Britain and the world from its origins in 625 A.D. to the present day. We will tell this emotionally-coloured and nuanced story, one of triumph and achievement as well as failure and muddle, through four key themes:- People. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s people. We examine the qualities that distinguish people serving at sea: courage, loyalty and sacrifice but also incidents of ignorance, cruelty and cowardice. We trace the changes from the amateur ‘soldiers at sea’, through the professionalization of officers and then ships’ companies, onto the ‘citizen sailors’ who fought the World Wars and finally to today’s small, elite force of men and women. We highlight the change as people are rewarded in war with personal profit and prize money but then dispensed with in peace, to the different kind of recognition given to salaried public servants. Increasingly the people’s story becomes one of highly trained specialists, often serving in branches with strong corporate identities: the Royal Marines, the Submarine Service and the Fleet Air Arm. We will examine these identities and the Royal Navy’s unique camaraderie, characterised by simultaneous loyalties to ship, trade, branch, service and comrades. Purpose. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s roles in the past, and explain its purpose today. Using examples of what the service did and continues to do, we show how for centuries it was the pre-eminent agent of first the British Crown and then of state policy throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffp2facts May06
    STAFF CADET PART II FACT SHEET HQ Kent Wing Air Training Corps Yeomanry Cottages, Boxley Road, Maidstone, Kent ME14 2AR Officer Commanding Wing Commander A. Atkins RAFVR(T) Wing Administrative Officer Squadron Leader R. Bushby RAFR (Including co-ordination of Camps and AEF) Wing Hon Chairman Squadron Leader R. E. Fawkes RAFVR(T) (Retd) Wing Chaplain Reverend D. Barnes Squadrons: 36 Staff Numbers: Officers: 63; Adult SNCOs: 68; Civilian Instructors 146 (correct at 20-Mar-06) Number of Cadets: 1115 enrolled and probationers (correct at 30-Sep-05) Wing Staff and Duties (as at 01-Jan-05) Post Duties WSO1 Squadron Leader V. R. Beaney RAFVR(T) Deputy Adventure Training Technical Officer, BELA Course Director, Duke of Edinburgh’s Award & Area 1 Staff Officer WSO2 Squadron Leader C. Hatton RAFVR(T) Gliding Liaison, Health and Safety, Airshows, Aircraft Recognition, Aeromodelling, AWO/Adult SNCO Liaison & Area 2 Staff Officer WSO3 Squadron Leader B. J. Fitzpatrick RAFVR(T) Classification and Syllabus Training (inc. BTECs), Pre-Adult and Adult Training Courses, Marconi-Elliott and Clarke Competitions, Bands & Area 3 Staff Officer WSO4 Squadron Leader R. C. Goodayle RAFVR(T) Deputy OC Wing, Adventure Training Technical Officer, Green Camps and ACF Liaison, PMC, Pentathlon & Area 4 Staff Officer WSO5 Flight Lieutenant D. C. Horsley RAFVR(T) Corporate Communications, Radio Communications, Flying Development and Flying Opportunities, Work Experience and Station Visits, Elworthy Trophy & Special Projects WSO6 Squadron Leader P. Atkins RAFVR(T) Cadet NCO Training Courses, Adult and Cadet First Aid Training, Techniques of Instruction, Nijmegen, Overseas Visits & Sun’n’Fun WWO AWO H. Hollamby Area Warrant Officers Wing Duties Performed by Squadron Staff Shooting Flight Lieutenant M.
    [Show full text]
  • Suez 1956 24 Planning the Intervention 26 During the Intervention 35 After the Intervention 43 Musketeer Learning 55
    Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd i 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East Louise Kettle 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiiiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Louise Kettle, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road, 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11/1 3 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 3795 0 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 3797 4 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 3798 1 (epub) The right of Louise Kettle to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iivv 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Contents Acknowledgements vii 1. Learning from History 1 Learning from History in Whitehall 3 Politicians Learning from History 8 Learning from the History of Military Interventions 9 How Do We Learn? 13 What is Learning from History? 15 Who Learns from History? 16 The Learning Process 18 Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENT NO. 6 DI Administration Cabinet 2/10
    SUPPLEMENT NO. 6 DI Administration Cabinet 2/10 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS This supplement contains the current committee composition chart with a description of the vacancy, committee history, nominee list and nomination forms for the following committees: 1. Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports. 2. Minority Opportunities and Interests Committee. 3. Olympic Sports Liaison Committee. 4. Postgraduate Scholarship Committee. 5. Research Committee. 6. Committee on Sportsmanship and Ethical Conduct. 7. Walter Byers Scholarship Committee. 8. Committee on Women’s Athletics. 9. Division I Amateurism Fact-Finding Committee. (One reappointment and two vacancies.) 10. Division I Committee on Athletics Certification. 11. Division I Men’s Basketball Issues Committee. 12. Division I Women’s Basketball Issues Committee. 13. Division I Football Issues Committee. (Three reappointments.) 14. Division I Committee on Infractions. 15. Division I Legislative Review/Interpretations Committee. 16. Division I Progress Toward Degree Waiver Committee. 17. Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement Committee. 18. Division I Baseball Committee. 19. Division I Men’s Basketball Committee. 20. Division I Women’s Basketball Committee. 21. Women’s Bowling Committee. 22. Men’s and Women’s Fencing Committee. (No nominees.) 23. Division I Field Hockey Committee. 24. Division I Football Championship Committee. (One reappointment and three vacancies.) 25. Division I Men’s Golf Committee. 26. Division I Women’s Golf Committee. 27. Men’s Gymnastics Committee. (No nominees.) 28. Women’s Gymnastics Committee. 29. Division I Men’s Ice Hockey Committee. 30. Women’s Ice Hockey Committee. 31. Division I Men’s Lacrosse Committee. 32. Division I Women’s Lacrosse Committee. 33. Men’s and Women’s Rifle Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File, 139.89 KB
    Armed Forces Equivalent Ranks Order Men Women Royal New Zealand New Zealand Army Royal New Zealand New Zealand Naval New Zealand Royal New Zealand Navy: Women’s Air Force: Forces Army Air Force Royal New Zealand New Zealand Royal Women’s Auxilliary Naval Service Women’s Royal New Zealand Air Force Army Corps Nursing Corps Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Vice-Admiral Lieutenant-General Air Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Rear-Admiral Major-General Air Vice-Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Commodore, 1st and Brigadier Air Commodore No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent 2nd Class Captain Colonel Group Captain Superintendent Colonel Matron-in-Chief Group Officer Commander Lieutenant-Colonel Wing Commander Chief Officer Lieutenant-Colonel Principal Matron Wing Officer Lieutentant- Major Squadron Leader First Officer Major Matron Squadron Officer Commander Lieutenant Captain Flight Lieutenant Second Officer Captain Charge Sister Flight Officer Sub-Lieutenant Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer Senior Commis- sioned Officer Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer (Branch List) { { Pilot Officer Acting Pilot Officer Probationary Assistant Section Acting Sub-Lieuten- 2nd Lieutenant but junior to Third Officer 2nd Lieutenant No equivalent Officer ant Navy and Army { ranks) Commissioned Officer No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No
    [Show full text]
  • FROM CRADLE to GRAVE? the Place of the Aircraft
    FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE? The Place of the Aircraft Carrier in Australia's post-war Defence Force Subthesis submitted for the degree of MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES at the University College The University of New South Wales Australian Defence Force Academy 1996 by ALLAN DU TOIT ACADEMY LIBRARy UNSW AT ADFA 437104 HMAS Melbourne, 1973. Trackers are parked to port and Skyhawks to starboard Declaration by Candidate I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgment is made in the text of the thesis. Allan du Toit Canberra, October 1996 Ill Abstract This subthesis sets out to study the place of the aircraft carrier in Australia's post-war defence force. Few changes in naval warfare have been as all embracing as the role played by the aircraft carrier, which is, without doubt, the most impressive, and at the same time the most controversial, manifestation of sea power. From 1948 until 1983 the aircraft carrier formed a significant component of the Australian Defence Force and the place of an aircraft carrier in defence strategy and the force structure seemed relatively secure. Although cost, especially in comparison to, and in competition with, other major defence projects, was probably the major issue in the demise of the aircraft carrier and an organic fixed-wing naval air capability in the Australian Defence Force, cost alone can obscure the ftindamental reordering of Australia's defence posture and strategic thinking, which significantly contributed to the decision not to replace HMAS Melbourne.
    [Show full text]