DOCSLIB.ORG

Hms Warrior - Ironclad Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hms Warrior - Ironclad Pdf FREE HMS WARRIOR - IRONCLAD PDF Wynford Davies | 128 pages | 15 Nov 2011 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781848320956 | English | Barnsley, United Kingdom HMS Warrior | Museum Ship & Venue | Portsmouth, Hampshir The Warrior -class ironclads were a class of two warships built for the Royal Navy between andthe first ocean-going ironclads with iron hulls ever constructed. They were initially armed with a mix of rifled breech-loading and muzzle-loading smoothbore guns, but the Armstrong breech-loading guns proved unreliable and were ultimately withdrawn from service. The ships spent their first commission with the Channel Fleet before being rearmed with new rifled muzzle-loading guns in the late s. Warrior rejoined the Channel Fleet after her refit while Black Prince joined the 1st Class Reserve and joined the fleet during its annual manoeuvres. The HMS Warrior - Ironclad ships exchanged roles after another refit in the mids. Both ships spent most of the last two decades of the 19th century in reserve. Warrior was hulked in and survived to be restored in as a museum ship. Black Prince became a training ship in and was hulked in before being sold for scrap in The Warrior -class ships have been described as revolutionary, but in truth they were more evolutionary than not as everything HMS Warrior - Ironclad their wrought iron armour had been in use by ocean-going ships for years. Brown commented, "What made [Warrior] truly novel was the way in which these individual aspects were blended together, making her the biggest and most powerful warship in the world. They were designed by Chief Constructor of the Navy Isaac Watts as gun armoured frigates largely based on the fine lines of the large frigate Mersey. Warrior and her sister Black Prince were not intended to stand in the line of battle as the Admiralty was uncertain about their ability to withstand concentrated fire from wooden two and three-deck ships of the line. Rather they were designed to be fast enough to force battle on a fleeing enemy and to control the range at which a battle was fought for their own advantage. The hull was subdivided by watertight transverse bulkheads into 92 compartments and had a double bottom underneath the engine and boiler rooms. Two HMS Warrior - Ironclad keels were fitted the first used by the HMS Warrior - Ironclad Navywhich significantly reduced the roll of the ships. Because of their length the ships proved to be very sluggish while manoeuvring, as Warrior proved when she collided with Royal Oak in This also prevented the ships from ramming any other ships. The bowsprit was shortened after completion in an effort to reduce the trim, but it was not noticeably successful. The Warrior -class ships had one 2-cylinder trunk steam engine made by John Penn and Sons driving HMS Warrior - Ironclad single footinch 7. The lower masts were made of wood, but the other masts were iron. Under both sail and steam Warrior once logged Both funnels were semi- retractable to reduce wind resistance while under sail alone. The ships' propellers could be hoisted up into the stern of the ship to reduce drag while under sail. They were the largest hoistable propellers ever made HMS Warrior - Ironclad required about men to be raised. The armament of the Warrior -class ships was intended to be 40 smoothbore, muzzle-loading pounder guns19 on each side on the main deck and one each fore and aft as chase guns on the upper deck. This HMS Warrior - Ironclad modified during construction to ten rifled pounder breech- loading gunstwenty-six pounders, and four rifled breech-loading pounder guns as saluting guns. The pounder guns were to have been replaced by pounder guns, but these failed their tests and were never issued. Four of the pounder guns were installed on the main deck amidships and the other two became chase guns; all of the pounder guns were mounted on the main deck. Firing tests carried out in September against an armoured target, however, proved that the HMS Warrior - Ironclad was inferior to the pounder smoothbore gun in armour penetration and repeated incidents of breech explosions during the Battles for Shimonoseki and the Bombardment of Kagoshima in —64 forestalled plans to completely equip the ships with the pounder gun. The 7. The shell of the pounder breech-loading gun was 4. In —64 the pounder guns were replaced by a heavier version with the same ballistics. All of the guns could fire both solid shot and explosive shells. Warrior received twenty-eight 7-inch and four 8-inch guns while Black Prince received four fewer 7-inch guns. Both ships received four pounder breech-loading guns for use as saluting guns. The calibre 7-inch gun weighed 6. It was credited with the nominal ability to penetrate 7. The Warrior -class ships had a wrought iron armour belt4. The armour extended 16 feet 4. The ends of the ship were left entirely unprotected which meant that the steering gear was very vulnerable. The gun ports of the Warrior -class ships were built 46 inches 1. While the ships were being built the directing bar was developed which consisted of an iron bar that fastened to a pivot bolt in the sill of the gun port. After the gun carriages were modified, this allowed them to pivot much closer HMS Warrior - Ironclad the gun port than had previously been possible and meant that the gun ports could be narrowed to a width of 24 inches 0. All together these modifications delayed the completion of Warrior by a year past her contract completion date. HMS Warrior - Ironclad Warrior joined the Channel Fleet in July and was placed in ordinary from toduring which time she HMS Warrior - Ironclad refitted. The ship rejoined the Channel Fleet in and towed a floating drydock to Bermuda in with her sister Black Prince. She was recommissioned into the 1st Class Reserve in and made periodic training cruises until The ship regained her original name in and was converted once more into an oil pipeline pier in Black Prince capsized while in dock at Greenockdamaging her masts. She arrived in Spithead in November with only jury-rigged fore and mizzenmasts. She was refitted in and given a poop deckHMS Warrior - Ironclad rejoined the Channel Fleet in as the flagship of Rear Admiral Sir John Dalrymple-Haysecond in command of the fleet. Black Prince was placed in reserve in in Devonport until she was converted to a training ship in in Queenstown, Ireland and renamed Emerald in From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. HMS Warrior in the s. Warrior -class ironclad. Warrior Black Prince. Ironclad warships of the United HMS Warrior - Ironclad. Temeraire S. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version. Wikimedia Commons. Royal Navy. Defence class. Armoured frigate. Belt : 4. Thames IronworksBlackwall, London. Robert NapierGovanGlasgow. Sold 21 February [22]. S Single ship of class X Cancelled. Ironclad - Warrior class | Total War Wiki | Fandom The HMS Warrior - Ironclad class ironclads are impressive, steam-propelled, ocean-going vessels, boasting strong iron hulls. Huge in scale, the ships are packed to the gunnels with rifle-armed crewmen who protect them from enemy attacks, should an enemy manage to get close enough to attempt a boarding. However, with the excellent firepower possessed by the Warrior class, few ships could get close enough to pose such an immediate threat. With all of this taken into account the crews of these ships have excellent morale. She had also been conceived, designed and built before the French ship was launched. However, such was the speed of change in naval architecture at this time that HMS Warrior was superseded by faster, HMS Warrior - Ironclad and better-armoured vessels in less than HMS Warrior - Ironclad decade. She was eventually withdrawn from service in The Warrior class ironclad is the strongest ship in Fall of the Samuraiboasting an armament of 42 cannons. Its heavy broadside can sink or detonate most ships with just a few volleys, and it boasts an unparalleled hull strength of 10, enough to take dozens of salvos from most ships and survive. It also boasts a slightly greater cannon range than most ships, allowing it to fire the first broadside and force opposing ships to maneuver closer to fire back. At close range, it has more crew than any other ship in the game, enough to fend off boarders with ease, though it cannot initiate boarding actions itself. A properly handled Warrior can take on an entire fleet and win. Its only significant weakness is its slow speed. Its large size also makes it somewhat more likely for enemy cannons to find their mark. The combination of its large size and slow speed make it an attractive target for torpedoesparticularly if caught between other ships or land. The Warrior HMS Warrior - Ironclad significantly more powerful than than its American or French counterparts, and is one of the main reasons for choosing to establish diplomatic relations with the British. Despite the very high cost of the Warrior and the British Trading District required to build it, the Warrior is well worth the cost. It is technically possible to have more than one Warrior class ship by successfully boarding and capturing an enemy Warrior, but this is difficult as it means declaring war on a fellow Imperial faction that is wealthy enough to build a British Trading District only Imperial factions can establish diplomatic missions with the United Kingdom and a Warrior something the A. I rarely doesthen trying to HMS Warrior - Ironclad the Warrior itself.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master Narrative Ours Is the Epic Story of the Royal Navy, Its Impact on Britain and the World from Its Origins in 625 A.D
    NMRN Master Narrative Ours is the epic story of the Royal Navy, its impact on Britain and the world from its origins in 625 A.D. to the present day. We will tell this emotionally-coloured and nuanced story, one of triumph and achievement as well as failure and muddle, through four key themes:- People. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s people. We examine the qualities that distinguish people serving at sea: courage, loyalty and sacrifice but also incidents of ignorance, cruelty and cowardice. We trace the changes from the amateur ‘soldiers at sea’, through the professionalization of officers and then ships’ companies, onto the ‘citizen sailors’ who fought the World Wars and finally to today’s small, elite force of men and women. We highlight the change as people are rewarded in war with personal profit and prize money but then dispensed with in peace, to the different kind of recognition given to salaried public servants. Increasingly the people’s story becomes one of highly trained specialists, often serving in branches with strong corporate identities: the Royal Marines, the Submarine Service and the Fleet Air Arm. We will examine these identities and the Royal Navy’s unique camaraderie, characterised by simultaneous loyalties to ship, trade, branch, service and comrades. Purpose. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s roles in the past, and explain its purpose today. Using examples of what the service did and continues to do, we show how for centuries it was the pre-eminent agent of first the British Crown and then of state policy throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Survivability and the Design of Modern Naval Warships
    Survivability and the Design of Modern Naval Warships ArsenalArsenal ShipShip ConceptConcept –– 1996 1996 Presented By: Russell Kupferer CSC Survivability Senior Engineer 202-675-8531, [email protected] 29 June 2010 EVENT/CLIENT NAME or Confidentiality statement 5/28/2008 4:54 PM New Brand FMT-P2_28May086/29/2010 1 Introduction • The primary difference between a Naval ship and a Commercial ship is SURVIVABILITY – Navy Ships are expected to be exposed to and survive enemy attack. – Safety ≠ Survivability, i.e. Design for safety does not ensure survivability. • Modern Naval Ships must balance a number of factors including weights, arrangements, missions, powering, propulsion, life cycle, cost, crewing, and survivability. • Survivability itself is a balance between expected threats, doctrine/tactics, susceptibility reduction, vulnerability reduction, damage control, and recoverability. EVENT/CLIENT NAME or Confidentiality statement 5/28/2008 4:54 PM New Brand FMT-P2_28May086/29/2010 2 Topics •Who am I? •An exceptionally brief review of warship evolution. •The Ship Design Spiral •The Kill Chain •Threat Weapon Types and Effects •Survivability Design –Susceptibility Reduction –Vulnerability Reduction –Damage Control Recoverability •Trends in Naval Ship/Survivability design •Conclusion/Questions EVENT/CLIENT NAME or Confidentiality statement 5/28/2008 4:54 PM New Brand FMT-P2_28May086/29/2010 3 CSC Advanced Marine Center Survivability Department •The CSC Advanced Marine Center Survivability department supports the NAVSEA design community, program
    [Show full text]
  • Military History Anniversaries 16 Thru 30 June
    Military History Anniversaries 16 thru 30 June Events in History over the next 15 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests Jun 16 1832 – Native Americans: Battle of Burr Oak Grove » The Battle is either of two minor battles, or skirmishes, fought during the Black Hawk War in U.S. state of Illinois, in present-day Stephenson County at and near Kellogg's Grove. In the first skirmish, also known as the Battle of Burr Oak Grove, on 16 JUN, Illinois militia forces fought against a band of at least 80 Native Americans. During the battle three militia men under the command of Adam W. Snyder were killed in action. The second battle occurred nine days later when a larger Sauk and Fox band, under the command of Black Hawk, attacked Major John Dement's detachment and killed five militia men. The second battle is known for playing a role in Abraham Lincoln's short career in the Illinois militia. He was part of a relief company sent to the grove on 26 JUN and he helped bury the dead. He made a statement about the incident years later which was recollected in Carl Sandburg's writing, among others. Sources conflict about who actually won the battle; it has been called a "rout" for both sides. The battle was the last on Illinois soil during the Black Hawk War. Jun 16 1861 – Civil War: Battle of Secessionville » A Union attempt to capture Charleston, South Carolina, is thwarted when the Confederates turn back an attack at Secessionville, just south of the city on James Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Maltese Casualties in the Battle of Jutland - May 31- June 1, 1916
    ., ~ I\ ' ' "" ,, ~ ·r " ' •i · f.;IHJ'¥T\f 1l,.l~-!l1 MAY 26, 2019 I 55 5~ I MAY 26, 2019 THE SUNDAY TIMES OF MALTA THE SUNDAY TIMES OF MALTA LIFE&WELLBEING HISTORY Maltese casualties in the Battle of Jutland - May 31- June 1, 1916 .. PATRICK FARRUGIA .... .. HMS Defence .. HMS lndefatigab!.e sinking HMS Black Prince ... In the afternoon and evening·of .. May 31, 1916, the Battle of Jutland (or Skagerrakschlact as it is krnwn •. to the Germans), was fought between the British Grand Fleet, under the command of Admiral Sir John Jellicoe, and the German High Seas Fleet commanded by Admiral Reinhold Scheer. It was to be the largest nava~ bat­ tle and the only full.-scale clash between battleships of the war. The British Grand Fleet was com­ posed of 151 warships, among which were 28 bat:leships and nine battle cruisers, wiile the German High Seas Fleet consisted of 99 war­ ships, including 16 battleships and 54 battle cruisers. Contact between these mighty fleets was made shortly after 2pm, when HMS Galatea reported that she had sighted the enemy. The first British disaster occured at 4pm, when, while engaging SMS Von der Tann, HMS Indefatigable was hit by a salvo onherupperdeck. The amidships. A huge pillar of smoke baden when they soon came under Giovanni Consiglio, Nicolo FOndac­ Giuseppe Cuomo and Achille the wounded men was Spiro Borg, and 5,769 men killed, among them missiles apparently penetrated her ascended to the sky, and she sank attack of the approaching battle­ aro, Emmanuele Ligrestischiros, Polizzi, resi1ing in Valletta, also lost son of Lorenzo and Lorenza Borg 72 men with a Malta connection; 25 'X' magazine, for she was sudcenly bow first.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS Drake, Church Bay, Rathlin Island
    Wessex Archaeology HMS Drake, Church Bay, Rathlin Island Undesignated Site Assessment Ref: 53111.02r-2 December 2006 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES IN RELATION TO THE PROTECTION OF WRECKS ACT (1973) HMS DRAKE, CHURCH BAY, RATHLIN ISLAND UNDESIGNATED SITE ASSESSMENT Prepared by: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park Salisbury Wiltshire SP4 6EB Prepared for: Environment and Heritage Service Built Heritage Directorate Waterman House 5-33 Hill St Belfast BT1 2LA December 2006 Ref: 53111.02r-2 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2006 Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No.287786 HMS Drake: Undesignated Site Assessment Wessex Archaeology 53111.02r-2 HMS DRAKE, CHURCH BAY, RATHLIN ISLAND UNDESIGNATED SITE ASSESSMENT Ref.: 53111.02r-2 Summary Wessex Archaeology was commissioned by Environment and Heritage Service: Built Heritage Directorate, to undertake an Undesignated Site Assessment of the wreck of HMS Drake. The site is located in Church Bay, Rathlin Island, Northern Ireland, at latitude 55º 17.1500′ N, longitude 06° 12.4036′ W (WGS 84). The work was undertaken as part of the Contract for Archaeological Services in Relation to the Protection of Wrecks Act (1973). Work was conducted in accordance with a brief that required WA to locate archaeological material, provide an accurate location for the wreck, determine the extent of the seabed remains, identify and characterise the main elements of the site and assess the remains against the non-statutory criteria for designation. Diving operations took place between 28th July and 5th August 2006. In addition to the diver assessment a limited desk-based assessment has been undertaken in order to assist with the interpretation and reporting of the wreck.
    [Show full text]
  • Examined: Archaeological Investigations of the Wrecks of HMS Indefatigable and SMS V4
    The Opening and Closing Sequences of the Battle of Jutland 1916 Re- examined: archaeological investigations of the wrecks of HMS Indefatigable and SMS V4 Innes McCartney Bournemouth University, Department of Archaeology, Anthropology and Forensic Science, Fern Barrow, Talbot Campus, Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB, UK This paper presents the findings from surveys carried out in 2016 of two wrecks sunk during the Battle of Jutland. The remains of HMS Indefatigable had previously only been partially understood. SMS V4, was found and surveyed for the first time. They represent the first and last ships sunk and allow the timings of the opening and closing of the battle to be established. In the case of HMS Indefatigable, the discovery that the ship broke in two, seemingly unnoticed, substantially revises the narrative of the opening minutes of the battle. Key words: nautical archaeology, battlefield archaeology, conflict archaeology, Battle of Jutland, World War One, Royal Navy. On 31 May 1916, the two most powerful battle-fleets in the world clashed off the coast of Denmark, in what in Britain has become known as the Battle of Jutland. In reality the battle was more of a skirmish from which the German High Seas Fleet, having accidentally run into the British Grand Fleet, was able to extricate itself and escape to base, leaving the British in control of the battlefield. However, in the 16 hours during which this drama played out, 25 ships were sunk, claiming more than 8500 lives. The Grand Fleet suffered 14 of the ships sunk and around 6000 of the lost sailors. More than 5000 of the British dead were lost on five ships that exploded, killing nearly every sailor aboard the ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Carriers Royal Canadian Navy (Rcn)
    CANADA AVIATION MUSEUM AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT CARRIERS ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY (RCN) Prepared by Commander E.J. L’Heureux CD, RCN (Ret’d) Introduction Naval Aviation had its start only eight years after the Wright Brothers first flew their “Flyer” at Kill Devil Hill, Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, USA, in 1903 and less than two years after J.A.D. McCurdy made the first airplane flight at Baddeck, on Bras D’Or Lake, Nova Scotia. It was in 1911 that Eugene Ely, an exhibition pilot, flew a Curtiss off the deck of the United States Ship (USS) BIRMINGHAM at anchor in Hampton Roads, Virginia, and flew it to Norfolk. Two months later he flew from Camp Selfridge to a 120 foot wooden deck fitted on the USS PENNSYLVANIA anchored in San Francisco Bay, proving the feasibility of the aircraft carrier. It would not be many years before the fledgling country of Canada was to participate in carrier based aviation, initially through the pilots who flew with the Royal Navy (RN) and latterly through the acquisition of aircraft carriers themselves. This story is a synopsis of that participation. Aircraft Carrier Development In the formative era of aircraft carrier development navies were tied to the concept that the bigger the ship and the larger the guns the more capable the navy. The bireme and trireme, referring to the numbers and layers of oars used in Greek and Roman galleons, gave way to the wooden hulls and big guns of later ships used in the Napoleonic Wars, and the battles of the Nile and Trafalgar.
    [Show full text]
  • Portsmouth Historic Dockyard Issue
    Middle School Scholars’ CONTENTS A Day at the Dockyard: Trip Report by ​ Newsletter Johnny James… p2-3 Lent Term 2019 A Brief History of Portsmouth Dockyard by Rory Middlemiss… p3-6 On HMS Victory by Oliver Hobbs… p6-8 Portsmouth ​ A Study of HMS Warrior by Alexander ​ Historic Dockyard Pavlides… p8-10 The Mary Rose: A Very Short Introduction by Matthew Rolfe… p10-11 ​ Issue HMS M33 and its Role in the Gallipoli Campaign by Thomas Perrott… p12-13 ​ Historical Perspectives: HMS Victory by ​ Fran Trotter… p13-15 The Story of the Ship that was Underwater for 430 Years by Thomas ​ Wright… p15-16 Early Modern Naval Cannons by Shawn ​ Xu… p17-18 Before; During; After: A Survey of HMS Victory and HMS Warrior by Rohan ​ Chandrasekaran… p18-20 Introduction There has been an aquatic theme to the scholars’ Lent term with fascinating talks, Creative Writing: respectively, from OA Tony Edwards on the The HMS Victory Diaries by Freddy sinking of the Tirpitz, and Commander Tony ​ Chelsom… p20-22 Long, CEO of Global Fishing Watch, on the threats to our oceans. The third year academic The Mary Rose : A Sailor’s Story by Ralph scholars also visited Portsmouth Historic ​ Hargreaves… p22-23 Dockyard, taking in The Mary Rose Museum, HMS Victory, HMS Warrior, HMS M33, as well as A Sonnet for The Mary Rose by Tom ​ having the chance to steer a tugboat. This Walters… p24 edition of the newsletter features articles from those students and we hope you enjoy it. 1 A Day at the Dockyard: Trip Report by Johnny James The group of seventeen scholars arrived by minibus at around 10 o’clock.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unpredictable Course of Naval Innovation – the Guns of HMS Thunderer
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 20, ISSUE 2 Studies The Unpredictable Course of Naval Innovation – The Guns of HMS Thunderer Ben Lombardi, PhD1 On 2 January 1879, a squadron of Britain’s Mediterranean Fleet was anchored near the entrance to the Gulf of Ismit in the Sea of Marmora. That morning, it conducted target practice. One of the battleships involved was HMS Thunderer, commissioned in 1877. Armed with two 38-ton (12.5 inch) muzzle-loading guns in its forward turret and two 35-ton (12 inch) guns in the aft turret, she was one of the most powerful and modern warships afloat. During the exercise that day, a broadside was fired at a target at a distance of 400 yards. After that, the guns were re-loaded and aimed at a target 1,000 yards distant. Firing independently, the right gun in the forward turret fired. Two or three minutes later, the left gun was fired and disaster struck. The gun’s barrel exploded, the lid of the turret was destroyed, and all but one man in the gun crew were killed, with 34 other members of the ship’s company injured. 2 A parliamentary committee convened in Malta only three weeks later. It concluded, after considering 1 The author is grateful for comments and suggestions on earlier drafts provided by Capt. (N) Matthew Coates (RCN), Cdr. William Reive (RCN), LCdr. Robert Bedard (RCN), Maj. Bill Ansell (RCAF), and Dr. Roy Rempel. 2 “Disaster in Naval Gunnery,” The Illustrated London News, 18 January 1879: pp. 4-6. ©Centre of Military and Strategic Studies, 2021 ISSN : 1488-559X VOLUME 20, ISSUE 4 several
    [Show full text]
  • Nmrn National Museum of the Royal Navy Master Narrative
    NMRN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE ROYAL NAVY MASTER NARRATIVE REVIEWED BY THE COLLECTIONS, RESEARCH, LEARNING AND ACCESS COMMITTEE OF THE TRUSTEES / 18 NOVEMBER 2015 NMRN NMRN MASTER NARRATIVE National Museum of the Royal Navy ~ Master Narrative OURS IS THE EPIC STOR Y of the Royal Navy, its impact on Britain and the world from its origins in 625AD to the present day. 1 3 4 NARRATIVE Fleet Air Arm. We will examine these identities and the Royal from a powerful internal force which at times shaped the Progress 1 Company from the first Royal Marines Commando We will tell this emotionally-coloured and nuanced Navy’s unique camaraderie, characterised by simultaneous policies of the state, to an armed force whose resources are unit, formed in 1942. story, one of triumph and achievement as well as failure loyalties to ship, trade, branch, service and comrades. determined by government priorities. We tell the story of the Royal Navy and innovation. Constant 2 Poster advertising ‘War Savings’ to fund naval technological developments in ship design, weapons, and muddle, through four key themes: expenditure, around 1942. Power Purpose navigation, infra-structure and communications have been People essential in providing a fighting advantage. These accelerate 3 The Royal Navy’s first aircraft flight from a We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s power as a defining We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s roles in the past, and from the 1840s as the Navy changes from a force of wooden stationary ship, 1912. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Jutland, “A Magnificent Spectacle, One Never to Be Forgotten”
    EMBARGO: 00.01 BST Sunday 22 May 2016 The Battle of Jutland, “a magnificent spectacle, one never to be forgotten” To mark the centenary of the Battle of Jutland, Imperial War Museums (IWM) is asking members of the public to discover, remember and share the stories of the men who bravely lived, fought and died, on the permanent digital memorial, Lives of the First World War. On the afternoon of the 31 May 1916, off the coast of Jutland in Denmark, the largest naval battle of the First World War took place, lasting just over 36 hours. Both sides claimed victory. However while the Germans lost 11 ships in comparison to the 14 ships lost by the British fleet, after the battle Britain managed to put as many as 24 dreadnoughts to sea, whereas the Germans only had ten ships fit to fight. Consequently the German surface fleet failed to significantly challenge the British again during the war. The Battle cost the lives of over 8,000 men and their stories, as well as those of all of the other people who served are recorded on Lives of the First World War. These stories include: Chief Baker Petty Officer Walter Joseph Henry Greenaway* was serving on HMS Vanguard during the Battle of Jutland. Walter was proving 360lb of dough when the fighting broke out. During the battle he witnessed several attacks on the British fleet by German torpedoes and his account of the battle details the battle and its aftermath. Walter survived Jutland but was killed in an internal explosion on HMS Vanguard in July 1917.
    [Show full text]
  • Centenary of the First World War the Battle of Jutland
    CENTENARY OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR THE BATTLE OF JUTLAND The National Commemoration of the Centenary of the Battle of Jutland 31 May 2016 St. Magnus Cathedral, Kirkwall, Orkney The Commonwealth War Graves Commission’s Lyness Royal Naval Cemetery, Hoy Jutland Bank THE NATIONAL COMMEMORATION OF THE CENTENARY OF THE BATTLE OF JUTLAND 31 May 2016 St. Magnus Cathedral, Kirkwall, Orkney The Commonwealth War Graves Commission’s Lyness Royal Naval Cemetery, Hoy Jutland Bank Front cover Ships of the Grand Fleet at anchor, Scapa Flow, 1916 © IWM SP1680 2 1 The clash between the British and German fleets in 1916 is described as the Battle of Jutland, but, in truth, the battle was fought over a huge area of the North Sea. It involved more ships than any previous naval battle. It also came at an awkward time in the development of power-driven warships. Their speed was much greater, but communication by radio was still in its infancy and radar had not been invented, while funnel smoke made communications by flags or light much more difficult. The potential for things to go wrong – always very great in sea battles – was greater than ever. There was, understandably, public disappointment with the result, but there is no doubt that it was fought with the highest courage and determination under the most difficult and challenging conditions. Whatever the judgement on the outcome, this commemoration of the centenary of the Battle is focused on the endurance and gallantry of all those who took part, on both sides, and particularly, on those who lost their lives.
    [Show full text]