Trustee Facts File, Third Edition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
John Newbery Award Committee Manual
JOHN NEWBERY AWARD COMMITTEE MANUAL October 2009 John Newbery Award Committee Manual – Formatted August 2015 1 FOREWORD John Newbery The Newbery Medal is named for John Newbery (1713-1767), known as the first publisher of books for children. The son of a farmer, he married a widow who owned a printing business in Reading, England. They moved to London and, in 1743, Newbery published “A Little Pretty Pocket-Book, intended for the Instruction and Amusement of Little Master Tommy and Pretty Miss Polly, with an agreeable Letter to read from Jack the Giant-Killer, as also a Ball and a Pincushion, the use of which will infallibly make Tommy a good Boy and Polly a good Girl.” Although this was not the first book published for children (A Play-Book for Children was published by “J.G.” as early as 1694), Newbery was the first person to take children’s book publishing seriously, and many of his methods were copied by other authors and publishers. Newbery was an admirer of John Locke, who advocated teaching children through “some easy pleasant book, suited to his capacity.” Newbery’s books invariably had their didactic side, but he tempered instruction with a sense of humor. Works like Goody Two-Shoes, in which a poor but virtuous young woman is rewarded with riches, satisfied the moralists while providing a story with all the ups and downs of a modern soap opera. Other books on Newbery’s list included Aesop’s Fables, books of history and science, miscellanies, and even a children’s magazine, The Lilliputian Magazine, which contained stories, riddles, and songs. -
Downloading—Marquee and the More You Teach Copyright, the More Students Will Punishment Typically Does Not Have a Deterrent Effect
June 2020 THE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION COPING in the Time of COVID-19 p. 20 Sanitizing Collections p. 10 Rainbow Round Table at 50 p. 26 PLUS: Stacey Abrams, Future Library Trends, 3D-Printing PPE Thank you for keeping us connected even when we’re apart. Libraries have always been places where communities connect. During the COVID19 pandemic, we’re seeing library workers excel in supporting this mission, even as we stay physically apart to keep the people in our communities healthy and safe. Libraries are 3D-printing masks and face shields. They’re hosting virtual storytimes, cultural events, and exhibitions. They’re doing more virtual reference than ever before and inding new ways to deliver additional e-resources. And through this di icult time, library workers are staying positive while holding the line as vital providers of factual sources for health information and news. OCLC is proud to support libraries in these e orts. Together, we’re inding new ways to serve our communities. For more information and resources about providing remote access to your collections, optimizing OCLC services, and how to connect and collaborate with other libraries during this crisis, visit: oc.lc/covid19-info June 2020 American Libraries | Volume 51 #6 | ISSN 0002-9769 COVER STORY 20 Coping in the Time of COVID-19 Librarians and health professionals discuss experiences and best practices 42 26 The Rainbow’s Arc ALA’s Rainbow Round Table celebrates 50 years of pride BY Anne Ford 32 What the Future Holds Library thinkers on the 38 most -
The FCC's Recent Enforcement of Obscenity Laws
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 15 Volume XV Number 4 Volume XV Book 4 Article 3 2005 PANEL III: Indecent Exposure? The FCC's Recent Enforcement of Obscenity Laws William Davenport Federal Communications Commission Jeffrey Hoeh NBC C. Edwin Baker University of Pennsylvania Law School Paul J. McGeady Morality in Media, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation William Davenport, Jeffrey Hoeh, C. Edwin Baker, and Paul J. McGeady, PANEL III: Indecent Exposure? The FCC's Recent Enforcement of Obscenity Laws, 15 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 1087 (2005). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol15/iss4/3 This Transcript is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PANEL 3 11/21/2005 1:10 PM PANEL III: Indecent Exposure? The FCC’s Recent Enforcement of Obscenity Laws Moderator: Abner Greene∗ Panelists: William Davenport† Jeffrey Hoeh‡ C. Edwin Baker§ Paul J. McGeady|| John Fiorini, III# MR. SPARKLER: Good afternoon and welcome back to our final panel, “Indecent Exposure? The FCC’s Recent Enforcement of Obscenity Laws.” Before we get started, I wanted to thank the staff and Editorial Board of the Journal for making this year’s Symposium such a success. -
Federal Depository Library Directory
Federal Depositoiy Library Directory MARCH 2001 Library Programs Service Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Wasliington, DC 20401 U.S. Government Printing Office Michael F. DIMarlo, Public Printer Superintendent of Documents Francis ]. Buclcley, Jr. Library Programs Service ^ Gil Baldwin, Director Depository Services Robin Haun-Mohamed, Chief Federal depository Library Directory Library Programs Service Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Wasliington, DC 20401 2001 \ CONTENTS Preface iv Federal Depository Libraries by State and City 1 Maps: Federal Depository Library System 74 Regional Federal Depository Libraries 74 Regional Depositories by State and City 75 U.S. Government Printing Office Booi<stores 80 iii Keeping America Informed Federal Depository Library Program A Program of the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) *******^******* • Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP) makes information produced by Federal Government agencies available for public access at no fee. • Access is through nearly 1,320 depository libraries located throughout the U.S. and its possessions, or, for online electronic Federal information, through GPO Access on the Litemet. * ************** Government Information at a Library Near You: The Federal Depository Library Program ^ ^ The Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP) was established by Congress to ensure that the American public has access to its Government's information (44 U.S.C. §§1901-1916). For more than 140 years, depository libraries have supported the public's right to know by collecting, organizing, preserving, and assisting users with information from the Federal Government. The Government Printing Office provides Government information products at no cost to designated depository libraries throughout the country. These depository libraries, in turn, provide local, no-fee access in an impartial environment with professional assistance. -
How to Deal with Crises, Cuts, & Conflict
CUSTOMER SERVICE Improvement n LITERACY Kids & Books n MANAGEMENT Next Steps JANUary/FEBRUary 2010 THE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION COPING MECHANISMS HOW TO DEAL WITH CRISES, CUTS, & CONFLICT n 8 Ways to Tackle Tough Times n Thriving by Design n ABLE in Afghanistan HAPPY 2O1O! (Your 2O11 solutions are already here.) While it may be 2010, our planning is well into 2011. It’s forward thinking that delivers solutions today for tomorrow’s library challenges. Like support for more databases than any other vendor, an unrivaled SaaS offering with fi ve datacenters around the world, mobile applications for staff productivity and patron use, and so much more. SoSo havehave a great 22O1O.O1O. We’llWe’ll bebe workingworking onon a greagreatt 2O112O11 andand beyond.beyond. GLOBALG L OBB AL HEADQUARTERS:HEADQD UARTERR S : PROVO,PROVOO , UTAH – 8800-288-802000-288- 8 020 – wwww.sirsidynix.comw w.sirsi d ynn ixi x ..como m CONTENTS AMERICAN LIBRARIES | January/February 2010 Features MIDWINTER MEETING PLANNER 79 WELCOME TO NEW ENGLAND Former vice president Al Gore, authors, advocacy, and youth media awards highlight the Boston agenda 95 WHERE TO EAT IN BOSTON Midwinter attendees won’t want for dining options BY BETSY CLARKE AND JESSICA SNOW ABLE IN AFGHANISTAN 44 One woman’s fight to reform information access in a war-torn nation BY CAROL A. ERICKSON It’s the CONTENT, STUPID 79 48 Librarians must help overcome resistance to research published online BY STEVEN ESCAR SMITH AND HOLLY MERCER 44 EMBRACING CHANGE FOR 52 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT -
KEEPING IT LEGAL a Guide for WV Broadcasters
KEEPING IT LEGAL A Guide for WV Broadcasters Published by: COLORADO INDIANA KENTUCKY OHIO PENNSYLVANIA WASHINGTON, D.C. WEST VIRGINIA This is an advertsiement. www.jacksonkelly.com TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i INTRODUCTION 1 ADVERTISING 3 ADVERTISING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES 3 What was the effect of Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island? .......................................................3 ADVERTISING OF LOTTERIES 5 What is a lottery? 5 How can the “lottery” designation be avoided? .......................................................................6 Is there an exception for charitable lotteries? ...........................................................................7 Are “snow ads” acceptable forms of advertising? ....................................................................7 Can you advertise lottery games which have been made legal by West Virginia state statute? ..................................................................................................................................................7 ADVERTISING OF TOBACCO 9 May television or radio stations advertise stores that specialize in the sale of tobacco products?...................................................................................................................................9 What may television and radio stations advertise? .................................................................10 What about advertisements for vaping? .................................................................................10 ADVERTISING MEDICAL -
The Threat of Conditioned Federal Funds for Indecent Programming on Public Broadcasting Rocio De Lourdes Cordoba
Hastings Law Journal Volume 42 | Issue 2 Article 5 1-1991 To Air or not to Err: The Threat of Conditioned Federal Funds for Indecent Programming on Public Broadcasting Rocio de Lourdes Cordoba Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Rocio de Lourdes Cordoba, To Air or not to Err: The Threat of Conditioned Federal Funds for Indecent Programming on Public Broadcasting, 42 Hastings L.J. 635 (1991). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol42/iss2/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To Air or Not to Err: The Threat of Conditioned Federal Funds for Indecent Programming on Public Broadcasting by Rocio.DE LOURDES CORDOBA* "The court jester who mocks the King must choose his words with great care.' Recent events have reinforced the truth of this maxim within the realm of the federal government's funding of the expression of ideas. While the funding activities of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) have received a great deal of attention, broadcasting also has become the target of legislation that highlights the federal govern- ment's morality campaign. The late 1980s appear to signal the apex of a forceful, yet iron- ically silent, campaign to remove indecency from the airwaves at any time, and in any shape or form. -
SELECTIVE HEARING: a CHALLENGE to the FCC's INDECENCY POLICY
NYLS Journal of Human Rights Volume 12 Issue 2 Article 5 Spring 1995 SELECTIVE HEARING: A CHALLENGE TO THE FCC's INDECENCY POLICY Tara Phelan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Phelan, Tara (1995) "SELECTIVE HEARING: A CHALLENGE TO THE FCC's INDECENCY POLICY," NYLS Journal of Human Rights: Vol. 12 : Iss. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights/vol12/iss2/5 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of Human Rights by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. SELECTIVE HEARING: A CHALLENGE TO THE FCC'S INDECENCY POLICY Forfive hundred years a struggle was fought, and in a few countries won, for the right of the people to speak and print freely, unlicensed, uncensored, and uncontrolled. But new technologies of electronic communication may now relegate old and freed media... to a corner of the public forum. Electronic modes of communication that enjoy lesser rights are moving to center stage. And so, as speech increasingly flows over those electronic media, the five-century growth of an unabridgedright of citizens to speak without controls may be endangered.' I. Introduction Freedom of speech and of the press, the touchstones of American democracy, have evolved hand in hand with the printed word.2 But in the communications revolution now afoot, print is being replaced as the most valuable information resource.' No longer do Americans turn only to the pages of the leading papers to receive news and opinions on important social topics; radio and television have become vital elements of today's media.4 The promises of 'ITHIEL DE SOLA POOL, TECHNOLOGIES OF FREEDOM 1 (1983). -
Racism and “Freedom of Speech”: Framing the Issues
Al Kagan Editorial Racism and “Freedom of Speech”: Framing the Issues The production and distribution of the ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom’s 1977 film was one of the most controversial and divisive issues in ALA history. The Speaker: A Film About Freedom was introduced at the 1977 ALA Annual Conference in Detroit, and was revived on June 30th, 2014, for a program in Las Vegas titled, “Speaking about ‘The Speaker.’” ALA Council’s Intellectual Freedom Committee (IFC) developed the program, which was cosponsored by the Freedom to Read Foundation (FTRF), the Library History Round Table and the ALA Black Caucus (BCALA). 4 Some background is necessary for context. This professionally made 42- minute color film was sponsored by the ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom in 1977 and made in virtual secret without oversight by the ALA Executive Board or even most of the Intellectual Freedom Committee members. In fact, requests for information about the film, for copies of the script from members of these two bodies were repeatedly rebuffed. Judith Krug (now deceased), Director of the Office for Intellectual Freedom, was in charge with coordination from a two- member IFC subcommittee and ALA Executive Director Robert Wedgeworth. The film was made by a New York production company, and was envisioned by Krug as an exploration of the First Amendment in contemporary society. The film’s plot is a fictionalized account of real events. A high school invites a famous scientist (based on physicist and Nobel prizewinner William Shockley) to speak on his research claiming that black people are genetically Al Kagan is Professor of Library Administration and African Studies Bibliographer Emeritus at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. -
Support for Digital Literacy in Public Libraries Contents
State Library Guidebook: Support for Digital Literacy in Public Libraries Contents Introduction Digital Literacy Planning in Action Step 1 Existing State Library Priorities and Supports Step 2 Current State of Digital Literacy Efforts Step 3 Common Challenges and Desired Support Step 4 Brainstorm Potential Support Ideas Step 5 Landscape Scan of Digital Literacy Resources Step 6 Prioritize Support Ideas for Further Exploration Appendices Appendix A 2012 Digital Literacy Survey Findings Appendix B 2012 Digital Literacy Survey Questions Appendix C Local Library Case Studies Appendix D State Library Support Vignettes Appendix E Big List of Support Ideas This guidebook has been designed so that relevant sections can be printed without printing the entire document. The sections have also been individually paginated. This project is made possible by a grant from the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. The Institute of Museum and Library Services is the primary source of federal support for the nation’s 123,000 libraries and 17,500 museums. Through grant making, policy development, and research, IMLS helps communities and individuals thrive through broad public access to knowledge, cultural heritage, and lifelong learning. Introduction State library agencies provide strategic and programmatic support to public library institutions to benefit local communities and help transform people’s lives. Statewide planning by state library agencies helps prioritize resources and support based on common and pressing needs across public libraries. Digital literacy is a critical area of need for support that has been growing in importance for public libraries in serving their communities. Digital literacy will continue to evolve as a necessary skill-set for individuals, organizations, and communities to have in order to participate in our ever more connected society. -
The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School Donald P
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Donald P. Bellisario College of Communications BROADCASTING, THE FCC, AND PROGRAMMING REGULATION: A NEW DIRECTION IN INDECENCY ENFORCEMENT A Dissertation in Mass Communications by David J. Weinert Ó 2018 David J. Weinert Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2018 The dissertation of David J. Weinert was reviewed and approved* by the following: Robert D. Richards John and Ann Curley Distinguished Professor of First Amendment Studies Dissertation Advisor and Chair of Committee Robert M. Frieden Pioneer Chair and Professor of Telecommunications and Law Matthew S. Jackson Head, Department of Telecommunications and Associate Professor Thomas M. Place Professor of Law, The Dickinson School of Law at Penn State Matthew P. McAllister Chair of Graduate Programs and Professor *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ABSTRACT The U.S. Supreme Court, in June 2012, left broadcasters in a “holding pattern” by dodging the longstanding question of whether the Federal Communications Commission’s broadcast indecency policy can survive constitutional scrutiny today given the vastly changed media landscape. The high court’s narrow ruling in FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. exonerated broadcasters for the specific on-air improprieties that brought the case to its attention, but did little to resolve the larger and more salient issue of whether such content regulations have become archaic. As a result, the Commission continues to police the broadcast airwaves, recently sanctioning a Roanoke, Virginia television station $325,000 for alleged broadcast indecency. This dissertation yields an in-depth analysis and synthesis of the legal obstacles the FCC will encounter in attempting to establish any revamped policy governing broadcast indecency. -
The FCC, Indecency, and Regulatory Transformations in the Shadows, 65 Admin
University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2013 "Smut and Nothing But": The CF C, Indecency, and Regulatory Transformations in the Shadows Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Lili Levi, "Smut and Nothing But": The FCC, Indecency, and Regulatory Transformations in the Shadows, 65 Admin. L. Rev. 509 (2013). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES "SMUT AND NOTHING BUT"*: THE FCC, INDECENCY, AND REGULATORY TRANSFORMATIONS IN THE SHADOWS LILI LEVI" TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .......................................... 511 I. The FCC's Indecency Regime ................................519 A. History of Indecency Regulation .............. ...... 520 B. The Indecency Policy in the Courts ................... 530 II. Beyond Fleeting Expletives-The Full Range of Changes to the FCC's Indecency Policy ................ ................... 536 A. Changes Regarding Remedies............. ................. 537 1. Fines..................... ...............