Fitzroy North Former Gasworks Site
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bridge Types in NSW Historical Overviews 2006
Bridge Types in NSW Historical overviews 2006 These historical overviews of bridge types in NSW are extracts compiled from bridge population studies commissioned by RTA Environment Branch. CONTENTS Section Page 1. Masonry Bridges 1 2. Timber Beam Bridges 12 3. Timber Truss Bridges 25 4. Pre-1930 Metal Bridges 57 5. Concrete Beam Bridges 75 6. Concrete Slab and Arch Bridges 101 Masonry Bridges Heritage Study of Masonry Bridges in NSW 2005 1 Historical Overview of Bridge Types in NSW: Extract from the Study of Masonry Bridges in NSW HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO MASONRY BRIDGES IN NSW 1.1 History of early bridges constructed in NSW Bridges constructed prior to the 1830s were relatively simple forms. The majority of these were timber structures, with the occasional use of stone piers. The first bridge constructed in NSW was built in 1788. The bridge was a simple timber bridge constructed over the Tank Stream, near what is today the intersection of George and Bridge Streets in the Central Business District of Sydney. Soon after it was washed away and needed to be replaced. The first "permanent" bridge in NSW was this bridge's successor. This was a masonry and timber arch bridge with a span of 24 feet erected in 1803 (Figure 1.1). However this was not a triumph of colonial bridge engineering, as it collapsed after only three years' service. It took a further five years for the bridge to be rebuilt in an improved form. The contractor who undertook this work received payment of 660 gallons of spirits, this being an alternative currency in the Colony at the time (Main Roads, 1950: 37) Figure 1.1 “View of Sydney from The Rocks, 1803”, by John Lancashire (Dixson Galleries, SLNSW). -
Height Clearance Under Structures for Permit Vehicles
SEPTEMBER 2007 Height Clearance Under Structures for Permit Vehicles INFORMATION BULLETIN Height Clearance A vehicle must not travel or attempt to travel: Under Structures for (a) beneath a bridge or overhead Permit Vehicles structure that carries a sign with the words “LOW CLEARANCE” or This information bulletin shows the “CLEARANCE” if the height of the clearance between the road surface and vehicle, including its load, is equal to overhead structures and is intended to or greater than the height shown on assist truck operators and drivers to plan the sign; or their routes. (b) beneath any other overhead It lists the roads with overhead structures structures, cables, wires or trees in alphabetical order for ready reference. unless there is at least 200 millimetres Map references are from Melway Greater clearance to the highest point of the Melbourne Street Directory Edition 34 (2007) vehicle. and Edition 6 of the RACV VicRoads Country Every effort has been made to ensure that Street Directory of Victoria. the information in this bulletin is correct at This bulletin lists the locations and height the time of publication. The height clearance clearance of structures over local roads figures listed in this bulletin, measured in and arterial roads (freeways, highways, and metres, are a result of field measurements or main roads) in metropolitan Melbourne sign posted clearances. Re-sealing of road and arterial roads outside Melbourne. While pavements or other works may reduce the some structures over local roads in rural available clearance under some structures. areas are listed, the relevant municipality Some works including structures over local should be consulted for details of overhead roads are not under the control of VicRoads structures. -
Lower Yarra River Corridor Study
Lower Yarra River Corridor Study YARRA MUNICIPAL TOOLKIT NOVEMBER 2016 Planisphere planning & urban design tel (03) 3419 7226 e-mail [email protected] Level 1/160 Johnston St Fitzroy VIC 3065 Find out more at www.planisphere.com.au Planisphere planning & urban design tel (03) 3419 7226 e-mail [email protected] Level 1/160 Johnston St Fitzroy VIC 3065 Find out more at www.planisphere.com.au © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning 2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/ ISBN XXX X XXXX (Online) Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136186, email customer. [email protected] (or relevant address), or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice. com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. -
HERITAGE GAP STUDY Review of Central Richmond
HERITAGE GAP STUDY Review of Central Richmond Stage 2 Final Report 12 November 2014 Prepared for City of Yarra Context Pty Ltd 2014 Project Team: Natica Schmeder, Associate Jessie Briggs, Heritage Consultant David Helms, David Helms Heritage Planning Report Register This report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Heritage Gap Study: Review of Central Richmond Stage 2 Final Report undertaken by Context Pty Ltd in accordance with our internal quality management system. Project Issue Notes/description Issue Date Issued to No. No. 1874 1 Stage 2 Final Report (draft 1) 22 October 2014 Erika Russell 1874 2 Stage 2 Final Report (draft 2) 6 November 2014 Erika Russell 1874 3 Stage 2 Final Report 12 November 2014 Erika Russell Context Pty Ltd 22 Merri Street, Brunswick VIC 3056 Phone 03 9380 6933 Facsimile 03 9380 4066 Email [email protected] Web www.contextpl.com.au ii STAGE 2 FINAL REPORT CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V Heritage precincts v Heritage places vi Review of existing HO places and precinct vii 1 INTRODUCTION 10 1.1 Purpose 10 1.2 Summary of stage 1 findings 11 1.3 Methodology 13 2 STAGE 2 FINDINGS 21 2.1 New precincts 21 2.2 Revised HO319 Elm Grove Precinct 29 2.3 Individual places 32 2.4 Review of existing HO places 38 2.5 City of Yarra Heritage Review Thematic History 42 2.6 Future work 44 3 RECOMMENDATIONS 45 3.1 Introduction 45 3.2 Statutory recommendations 45 3.3 Other actions 46 3.4 Stage 3: creation/updating of Hermes records 47 REFERENCES 48 City of Yarra Heritage Studies 48 Other 48 APPENDIX A – NEW PRECINCTS & HO319 ELM GROVE 49 A.1 Abinger Street Precinct 50 A.2 Bell Street Precinct 62 A.3 Bellevue Estate Precinct 74 A.4 Burnley Street Precinct 83 A.5 Coppin Street Precinct 93 A.6 Edinburgh Street Precinct 105 A.7 Hosie Street Precinct 114 A.8 Mitchell Street Precinct 123 A.9 Neptune Street Precinct 132 A.10 Park Avenue Precinct 141 A.11 Stawell Street Precinct 150 A.12 HO319 Elm Grove Precinct 158 APPENDIX B – INDIVIDUALLY SIGNIFICANT PLACES 167 B.1 Attached houses, 23 & 25 Abinger Street, Richmond 168 B.2 W. -
Boroondara Thematic Environmental History 2012
CITY OF BOROONDARA THEMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY prepared for CITY OF BOROONDARA FINAL : MAY 2012 P O B o x 8 0 1 9 C r o y d o n 3 1 3 6 w w w . b u i l t h e r i t a g e . c o m . a u p h o n e 9 0 1 8 9 3 1 1 Schedule of Changes Issued Draft for Public Consultation July 2011 Final, incorporating changes adopted by Council on 12 December 2011 March 2012 Updated, incorporating minor corrections May 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS A Executive Summary 5 B Project Background, Brief and Methodology 7 C Historical Overview 13 D Statement of Significance 17 E Thematic Environmental History 19 1.0 SHAPING VICTORIA'S ENVIRONMENT 21 1.1 Tracing climate and topographical change 21 1.2 Tracing the emergence of Victoria's plants and animals 21 1.3 Understanding scientifically diverse environments 22 1.4 Creation stories and defining country 22 1.5 Living with natural processes 22 1.6 Appreciating and protecting Victoria's natural wonders 25 2.0 PEOPLING VICTORIA'S PLACES AND LANDSCAPES 31 2.1 Living as Victoria's original inhabitants 31 2.2 Exploring, surveying and mapping 31 2.3 Adapting to diverse environments 34 2.4 Arriving in a new land 34 2.5 Migrating and making a home 35 2.6 Maintaining distinctive cultures 41 2.7 Promoting settlement 42 2.8 Fighting for identity 54 3.0 CONNECTING VICTORIANS BY TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS 55 3.1 Establishing pathways 55 3.2 Travelling by water 59 3.3 Linking Victorians by rail 59 3.4 Linking Victorians by road in the twentieth century 64 3.5 Travelling by tram 69 3.6 Linking Victorians by air 71 3.7 Establishing -
Richmond Conservation Study
I I I RICHMOND CONSERVATION I STUDY I I I I I VOLUME 2. I I |COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND PHONE4283131 I COMMISSIONER A. G. GILLON O.B.E..J.P. I Your Ref: Our Ref: I THE RICHMOND URBAN CONSERVATION STUDY I The completion of this Conservation Study hereby represents a significant milestone for Richmond. I commend it to you and 1 endorse its recommendations in principle. I use the term "in principle" because the Conservation Study is just one part of an overall strategy plan being proposed for I Richmond. This means that conservation controls will be considered in the wider context of other matters just as economic development, housing, traffic management and the like. There will inevitably be conflicting objectives and these must be 1 reconciled by Council, in due course, after extensive public consultation. I It seems that controls over the preservation of our built heritage are almost always "too late", no matter when they are introduced. Nevertheless, I believe we have done the best job within the I available resources and that the release of the Study is timely, given the increasing pressure for large scale redevelopment that Richmond is experiencing. I Council is grateful to the National Estates Committee, the Historic Buildings Council and the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works in providing funding for the Study. Undoubtedly credit I is due to the consultants who have done a superb job and to our Urban Conservation Advisory Committee for guidance and overall direction. I I look forward to the implementation of the Study and its impact on Richmond. -
City of Yarra Heritage Review Building Citations
CITY OF YARRA HERITAGE REVIEW BUILDING CITATIONS VOLUME 2 PART I CITY OF YARRA HERITAGE REVIEW BUILDING CITATIONS VOLUME 2 PART I Allom Lovell & Associates Conservation Architects 35 Little Bourke Street Melbourne 3000 July 1998 City ofYarra Heritage Review: Building Citations TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 2: PART I TABLE OF CONTENTS i CONSULTANTS ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and Brief 1 1.2 Methodology 1 1.3 Designation of Structures 1 1.4 Datasheets 2 2.0 SUMMARY LIST OF DATASHEETS 5 2.1 Summary List of Datasheets 7 3.0 DATASHEETS A-K 11 VOLUME 2: PART II 4.0 DATASHEETS L-Z 217 Allom Lovell & Associates City ofYarra Heritage Review: Building Citations CONSULTANTS This report was prepared by: Robyn Riddett Allom Lovell & Associates George Phillips Katrina Place Emma J Derham Watson Allom Lovell & Associates City of Yarra Heritage Review: Building Citations ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to acknowledge the assistance of the following people: The City of Yarra Steering Gommittee: John Phillips Mayor, City of Yarra Robyn Williams Councillor, City of Yarra Diane Morrison Manager of Major Projects & Development Planning Alison Blacket Co-ordinator of Development Planning In addition to: The staff of the Yarra-Melbourne Regional Library Corporation Nino Ceddia Engineering Manager, AMCOR Paper Australia Allom Lovell & Associates in City ofYarra Heritage Review: Building Citations iv Allom Lovell & Associates City ofYarra Heritage Review: Building Citations 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background and Brief As part of the Heritage Review of the City of Yarra, a review of individually significant structures was undertaken. A number of previous conservation studies existed: Andrew Ward's Collingwood Conservation Study (1995); John & Thurley O'Connor, Ros Coleman & Heather Wright's Richmond Conservation Study (1985); Graeme Butler's Northcote Urban Conservation Study (1982); and Allom Lovell & Associates' City of Fitzroy Heritage Study (1992). -
Victorian Heritage Database Place Details - 2/10/2021 Richmond Park
Victorian Heritage Database place details - 2/10/2021 Richmond Park Location: Yarra Blvd, BURNLEY VIC 3121 - Property No G13143 Heritage Inventory (HI) Number: Listing Authority: HI Extent of Registration: 1 Statement of Significance: Richmond Park, set aside as the Survey Paddock in 1836-37 for the agistment of the surveyor's horses, gazetted as Richmond's first public park in 1862, location of experimental horticultural gardens (1861) and Australia's first School of Horticulture (1891), traversed by the Yarra Boulevard built in the 1930s Depression by sustenance labourers, and maintained in continuous use as public parkland since its initial reservation, is of historic, aesthetic, social and scientific cultural significance to the state of Victoria. It is historically significant -- for its very early (1836-37) reservation, one of the earliest reserves of open space in Melbourne's history; -- for its close association with Robert Hoddle and Clement Hodgkinson, whose work was fundamental to the surveying and settlement of Victoria ; -- for its riverside location which makes it rare amongst Melbourne's early parks and gardens; -- as a place which contributes to a 140-year European tradition of recreation along the Yarra River, initially demonstrated by the construction of a railway station solely for picnickers in the Park (Pic Nic Station), the popularity of the Park's river frontage for tea gardens (in which the almost-encircling Yarra River played an integral role), recently reinforced by the construction and use of the Main Yarra