ROHR ROHR AIRCRAFT CORPORATION M a G a Z I N E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ROHR ROHR AIRCRAFT CORPORATION M a G a Z I N E ROHR ROHR AIRCRAFT CORPORATION M a g a z i n e MAIN PLANT AND CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS: August I960 Cbula Vista, California MANUFACTURING PLANT: Riverside, California ASSEMBLY PLANTS: Auburn, Washington and Winder, Georgia -m% •«i. mm ittt Mi ^F7f-~^ h 1940 - 1960 I ti BEATINGTHOEES "XVRohr's New Honeycomb Core Machine JKXX/ Eases Production Problems EN men started pushing the honeycomb and then brazed to thin dustry learned, would give the re- speed of airplanes up toward skins, or face sheets, also of stainless quired protection. the speed of sound it soon became steel to form an extremely strong, Rohr and several other companies apparent that more than one barrier light and heat resistant structure, have been producing stainless honey- would be met before aircraft could Using this material in the critical heat comb panels of this kind for some fly at Mach II or Mach III. They areas of a Mach II aircraft, the in- time. Rohr builds such panels for the realized that better power plants alone would not suffice to get a plane to supersonic speeds much over Mach I. It was apparent that even the sturdy structures of the subsonic or Mach I jets would come completely "unglued" at high Mach numbers. The aluminum structures were cer­ tain to fail when they encountered the skin friction temperatures gener­ ated by such speeds. Sonic vibrations also had to be overcome. And all of this has to be done without substan­ tial increases in weight. Stainless steel offered the heat re­ sistant qualities and the strength needed at all temperatures but the material was too heavy when used in the same way as lighter metals. Many companies, Rohr among them, experimented with various materials and structures and eventually the brazed stainless steel honeycomb sandwich structure was hit upon as the best solution to the heat, sonic vibration and strength-weight prob­ lems. It was found that strips of stainless steel foil as thin as .005 of an inch could be welded together into a ¥&#• - •": Fred H. Rohr, chairman of the board, inspects operations on one of the core mac ines developed under his personal supervision. They are now in production. —— mWBfi • • y&M make it in continuous sections of al­ most any desired length or width. This is a decided advantage in the production of large airframe surfaces, since the previous practice of welding jWFjorfflE together small sections of core in­ creased weight, production time and the possibility of built-in flaws. Core produced on these new mach­ ines has a new degree of uniformity CllERY flflDS —with each square cell just like the next one—and closer tolerances on thickness. The machine can produce core in any thickness up to five inches and in any cell size from 3/16 i*^f A New Concept inch to 3/8 inch. Core can be per­ forated where required. Although the machines have been operating on a production basis a relatively short time, the core has Structurally slroiig brazed honeycomb uutdwich panels require perfectly been accepted, after rigid inspection An Indtiiftry formed core. and testing, by several major air­ frame producers and is being used in Convair B-58 Mach II bomber and universal use of this surprising ma­ for the McDonnell F4H II Phantom, terial. sandwich panels being built by Rohr a Navy interceptor. The Mach III Not only do these new Rohr mach­ for some of our most advanced air­ B-70 bomber being developed by ines make better core faster, they can craft. North American Aviation will em­ ploy substantial quantities of stain­ A small dirt airstrip between South Bay and Chula Vista farms was the site selected for the main plant and corporate head­ less honeycomb sandwich material— quarters of the company. a large portion of it from Rohr. Engineers see many potential ap­ HE Winter of 1940-41 was Cali­ were hundreds of acres of celery and scene that greets the visitor now, 20 plications for the material in the air­ T fornia's wettest for many years. tomato fields, and lemon groves. years later, when he visits the Rohr craft, missile and space field. But Reservoirs were filled, the ground Sloshing through mud and across main plant and corporate headquar­ frequently the same engineers have was soaked, streams were running duckboard walks, the moving task ters, or any of the Company's three made every effort to avoid using bank full, and the hillsides were force carried the last of the Com­ other plants. The original building stainless honeycomb structures be­ green with lush grass that sprang up, pany's equipment and materiel into now is but a small part of one of the cause of cost and production prob­ as if by magic, from hitherto parched the new budding, and Rohr Aircraft factory structures, and this, in turn, lems. The core has been difficult and and dusty fields. The rain that came Corporation, five months after its is surrounded by 40 other buildings, slow to manufacture. Brazing pro­ down steadily during January and founding—in August, 1940—was in all with a total floor space of cesses have been long and costly. In­ February was welcomed by everyone. production in its permanent home. 1,351,200 square feet, on 156 acres spection is difficult. Core dimensions Everyone, that is, except a small Office space was obtained in a of land. In addition, the plant at contingent of executives and work­ rented barn in an adjoining field, and Riverside occupies 645,190 square have been limited. men engaged in the interesting task the patter of winter rain on the cor­ feet on 95 acres; at Auburn, Wash­ Along with research into new and of moving Rohr Aircraft Corporation rugated iron roof frequently drowned ington, 49,271 square feet on 48 faster brazing methods—which have from a rented building in the whole­ out the clatter of typewriters and acres, and 28,525 square feet at Winder, Georgia. The latter is on resulted in some promising develop­ sale district of San Diego into the adding machines as the new Com­ first structure on its present site in pany's small office staff recorded the land leased from the city of Winder; ments—Rohr has had a continuing u Chula Vista. transactions that already were begin­ all the rest of the land occupied is program for several years pointed at This was a 37,000 square foot fac­ ning to increase. Greater office effici­ owned by the Company. The total a machine that would make better tory building, and its vast expanse of ency could have been maintained, square footage of floor space occu­ core faster. floor space caused some of these en­ some of the old timers recall, had the pied by the Company is 2,074,186, gaged in the moving task to wonder if rain stayed outside. But holes in the on 299 acres of Company owned Several such machines now are in perhaps they hadn't over-built. The metal roof let in vast quantities of land. production and the results indicate w/im building was situated in a muddy water, and bookkeepers and typists Fred H. Rohr founded the Com­ that the development program—per­ field at the lower end of San Diego divided their time between machines pany on an idea that the aircraft in­ sonally supervised throughout by Bay, on the outskirts of Chula Vista, and emptying buckets and pans dustry needed a "feeder plant," one ^ which surrounded them on desks, Chairman of the Board Fred H. Rohr which then had a population of about that furnished parts and assemblies, 5,000. Between the Company's new tables and the floor. the creation of which required spec­ —may point the way toward more £L Absolute uniformity of core structure is apparent in this close-up view. property and the business district All of which is a far cry from the ialized skills and equipment, to air- ROHR Magazine, August, 1960 - pr Rohr outgrew these early quarters in the San Diego warehouse the Company had not been formed airlines to replace equipment now With the outbreak of the Korean district in a matter of months. as a "war baby,** like all other manu­ worn out and obsolete. war in 1951, military orders increas­ facturers, in virtually all industries, Convair, Boeing and Lockheed, ed rapidly and in 1952 the Company frame manufacturers. He believed, its facilities had been diverted to mili­ all of whom were creating and manu­ established a second plant at River­ and later proved, that the Company tary production. facturing new transports turned to side, California. Then, as an added could provide these specialized com­ The lull that came with the end of Rohr for power packages and other service to customers—in this case ponents at a cost lower than that for the war had been foreseen by the assemblies, such as exhaust systems, Lockheed at Marietta, Georgia—an m which the prime contractor could Company's management and now be­ and oil and fuel tanks. The Boeing assembly plant was opened at Wind­ produce them. gan exploration of the demand for Stratocruiser, the Convair Liner, the er, Georgia in 1954. Also, to better First products of the new company commercial products. As a step in Lockheed Constellation series and, serve Boeing, a second assembly I II were cowl panels for the Hudson this direction, the Company jomed later on, the Douglas DC-7 went into plant was opened at Auburn, Wash­ bomber, then being built by Lock­ and became a subsidiary of Interna­ production, and Rohr became so ington in 1956.
Recommended publications
  • Flight Safety Digest May 1989
    The First Two Minutes The author reviews problems that have confronted flight crews during the critical takeoff phase and concludes that the accident record would improve considerably if as much attention is paid to the prevention of takeoff emergencies as to the response to them. by Gerard M. Bruggink Worldwide accident statistics show consistently that sented here. Nor does it follow that the recent primacy most air-carrier accidents occur in the approach and of takeoff accidents in the United States could not have landing phase of flight. In the same statistics, takeoff been duplicated elsewhere in the world; it so happens accidents are next in frequency of occurrence. Accord- that the U.S. accident data are the most-readily avail- ing to a recent study by Captain Caesar1, these two able for analysis — at least to this writer. phases of operation accounted for 80 percent of the 370 total losses of jet transports in the 1959-1987 period: Within the limited scope of this discussion it is suffi- 57 percent occurred during approach and landing; 23 cient to realize that the prominence of takeoff accidents percent during takeoff. as the greatest loss-producer in the United States during the past five years was brought about by two factors: The predominance of approach and landing (A&L) ac- cidents is confirmed by the fatal jet transport accident • The remarkable decline of A&L accidents over experience of U.S. air carriers over the last two decades the last 20 years, and (1968-1987). Of the 67 fatal accidents in that time frame, 33 (50 percent) were A&L accidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Facts and Figures 1983/84
    Aerospace Facts and Figures 1983/84 AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Published by Aviation Week & Space Technology A MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATION 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, N.Y. 10020 (212) 997-3289 $9.95 Per Copy Copyright, July 1983 by Aerospace Industries Association o' \merica, Inc. · Library of Congress Catalog No. 46-25007 2 Compiled by Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 429-4600 Director Research Center Virginia C. Lopez Manager Economic Data Service Janet Martinusen Editorial Consultant James J. Haggerty 3 ,- Acknowledgments Air Transport Association of America Battelle Memorial Institute Civil Aeronautics Board Council of Economic Advisers Export-Import Bank of the United States Exxon International Company Federal Trade Commission General Aviation Manufacturers Association International Civil Aviation Organization McGraw-Hill Publications Company National Aer~mautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Management and Budget U.S. Departments of Commerce (Bureau of the Census, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Industrial Economics) Defense (Comptroller; Directorate for Information, Operations and Reports; Army, Navy, Air Force) Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics) Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration The cover and chapter art throughout this edition of Aerospace Facts and Figures feature computer-inspired graphics-hot an original theme in the contemporary business environment, but one particularly relevant to the aerospace industry, which spawned the large-scale development and application of computers, and conti.nues to incorpora~e computer advances in all aspects of its design and manufacture of aircraft, mis­ siles, and space products.
    [Show full text]
  • Ntsb/Aas-64-Aa
    , I (j (. .1 u!) \J _l'·,· ~ABLE OF CONTENTS A. INT~ODUCTION 1 . Rcvie1-1 u f in;1'tents 2. T11,pl·:::r:cn ta ti on of Requirements b., Re.so luUoI~ of Conflicts c <· Consider a t,iorJ rif Avc:.ilable Research J, Considerat icn of Past Di.fficultie:3 et Aircraft CcckFits Accide~i/Incia2nt Re2ord 6 Conclusions C .. CREd COMP.LEHZ!~T l.. Review of 11.eq1.iirements ;::i, Views of the Industry a. Ma~uf2cturers ~~ Air Carriers c. 1·'!.:.:Uu.:·:J.l Avi at.ion Agency cL. .Pilot Organization e., Flisht Eng:inc:er Organization h. Conclusions .D. cnn·.r DUTIE.S 1. Review of ~equirements 2. Views of the Industry a. Manufacturers b .. Air Carriers c. FBricral Aviation Agency d, Military e, Flight Engi.near On.;..n] za ti on f. Pilot Organization 000002 Evalua 1:.ion Conclusions I l. e.. Fi..-:.. J.\.FI?ENDI CES II. TJ, S. J.._i-:: C:::.2'.'rie~ l~:.r..:i.Je'."'_t.s f'::.r 1J 1~riod cfo.:,.;:-::1v .July =...> ~964 - 'L-;_:rbcjet Aircr:;.ft J.11' r.·;.:;:: ~·=-:·:~-= B·::a_-l.:'..::::"~'.:':":. ~Tr: s -:~:; te1--,lis:-~:::d by BAC-ll.~. n:.:;. 9 E\r~.:il·;,s.T ~.or, Com~tr~:.t-_:.se- ::i.s p:cs.:_::,s~1ted by ..L;n~ pj_j_ot Org~r.. iz:-.. -.·. .ior; IV. Limi t:a·:::i..c:".::: f::i::.· T:·-cr:.1.::;por r:: Ai:t-::::.a.f~ Op.:::::-·:;.-:-.~~::.·":; w:i rh 1.;.r:..> '.!V:"':L!."1 crew ~L: p~~0:etJ.t:::l ty ~~1E: Fligl1t E11ginc('=Y O:t;ar,j_zg.-,l..Jn v.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2019
    Airbus A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2019 Contents Scope and definitions 02 1.0 2020 & beyond 05 Accidents in 2019 07 2020 & beyond 08 Forecast increase in number of aircraft 2019-2038 09 2.0 Commercial aviation accidents since the advent of the jet age 10 Evolution of the number of flights & accidents 12 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 13 Impact of technology on aviation safety 14 Technology has improved aviation safety 16 Evolution of accident rates by aircraft generation 17 3.0 Commercial aviation accidents over the last 20 years 18 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 20 Ten year moving average of accident rate 21 Accidents by flight phase 22 Distribution of accidents by accident category 24 Evolution of the main accident categories 25 Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accident rates 26 Loss Of Control In-flight (LOC-I) accident rates 27 Runway Excursion (RE) accident rates 28 List of tables & graphs 29 A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2019 02 Scope and definitions This publication provides Airbus’ a flight in a commercial aircraft annual analysis of aviation accidents, is a low risk activity. with commentary on the year 2019, Since the goal of any review of aviation as well as a review of the history of accidents is to help the industry Commercial Aviation’s safety record. further enhance safety, an analysis This analysis clearly demonstrates of forecasted aviation macro-trends that our industry has achieved huge is also provided. These highlight key improvements in safety over the factors influencing the industry’s last decades.
    [Show full text]
  • \Aircraft Recognition Manual
    Jf V t 9fn I 4-'!- Vw'^ ' 'o | ^ renai; 408.$ /•> ,A1.AI / -3o FM DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 30-30 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NavWeps 00-80T-75 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AFM 50-40 MARINE CORPS NavMC 2522 \AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION MANUAL SI ISSUED BY DIRECTION OF\ CHIEF OF BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS \ \ I 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 30-30 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NavWeps 00-80T-75 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AFM 50-40 MARINE CORPS NavMC 2522 AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION MANUAL •a ISSUED BY DIRECTION OF CHIEF OF BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS JUNE 1962 DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMY, THE NAVY AND THE AIR FORCE, WASHINGTON 25, D.C., 15 June 1962 FM 30-30/NAVWEPS 00-80T-75/AFM 50-40/NAVMC 2522, Aircraft Recognition Manual, is published for the information and guidance of all concerned. i BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARIES OF THE ARMY, THE NAVY, AND THE AIR FORCE: G. H. DECKER, General, Umted States Army, Official: Chief of Staff. J. C. LAMBERT, Major General, United States Army, The Adjutant General. PAUL D. STROOP Rear Admiral, United States Navy, Chief, Bureau of Naval Weapons. CURTIS E. LEMAY, Official: Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, R. J. PUGH, Colonel, United States Air Force, Director of Administrative Services. C. H. HAYES, Major General, U.S. Marine Corps, Deputy Chief of Staff (Plans). H DISTRIBUTION: ARMY: Active Army : DCSPER (1) Inf/Mech Div Co/Btry/Trp 7-2 44-112 ACSI (1) (5) except Arm/Abn Div 7- 44-236 52 DCSLOG (2) Co/Trp (1) 8- 44-237 137 DCSOPS(5) MDW (1) 8-500 (AA- 44-446 ACSRC (1) Svc Colleges (3) AH) 44447 CNGB (1) Br Svc Sch (5) except 10-201 44^536
    [Show full text]
  • B-162897 Aircraft Owned Or Leased By
    Dear Mr, Thompson: Reference is made to your letter of February 10, 1970, requesting that we update information which we furnished to you in a report dated March 4, 1968, relative to aircraft owned or leased by the Federal Avia- 1 tion Administration (FAA). In accordance with this request, we are fur- nishing you the following information. 1. Inventory of active aircraft owned as of June 30, 1967, 1968, 1969, and January 1, 1970 (enclosure I). 2. Installed passenger capacity and cost of aircraft owned as of June 30, 1967, and January 1, 1970 (enclosure II). 3. Aircraft leased or on loan during the period July 1, 1967, through June 30, 1969 (enclosure III). 4. Aircraft mazntenance, maJor overhaul, and modification costs by aircraft type, for fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure IV). 5. Average cost per flxght hour by aircraft type, fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure V>. 6. Aircraft utilization by aircraft type and maJor cate- gories, fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure VI). 7. Utilization and cost of open market rental aircraft, fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure VII). In addition, you requested that we advise you of the progress that has been made in establishing a uniform maintenance and operating cost re- porting system for all FAA owned and leased aircraft. As shown zn our March 4, 1968, report, FhCl had 101 aircraft which cost approximately $46 mzlllon 1n its inventory of active aircraft as of June 30, 1967. On January 1, 1970, the number of active air craft had decreased Co 98; however, the cost of the aircraft in the inventory was approximately $52 million, This increase was the net result of.
    [Show full text]
  • General Files Series, 1932-75
    GENERAL FILE SERIES Table of Contents Subseries Box Numbers Subseries Box Numbers Annual Files Annual Files 1933-36 1-3 1957 82-91 1937 3-4 1958 91-100 1938 4-5 1959 100-110 1939 5-7 1960 110-120 1940 7-9 1961 120-130 1941 9-10 1962 130-140 1942-43 10 1963 140-150 1946 10 1964 150-160 1947 11 1965 160-168 1948 11-12 1966 168-175 1949 13-23 1967 176-185 1950-53 24-53 Social File 186-201 1954 54-63 Subject File 202-238 1955 64-76 Foreign File 239-255 1956 76-82 Special File 255-263 JACQUELINE COCHRAN PAPERS GENERAL FILES SERIES CONTAINER LIST Box No. Contents Subseries I: Annual Files Sub-subseries 1: 1933-36 Files 1 Correspondence (Misc. planes) (1)(2) [Miscellaneous Correspondence 1933-36] [memo re JC’s crash at Indianapolis] [Financial Records 1934-35] (1)-(10) [maintenance of JC’s airplanes; arrangements for London - Melbourne race] Granville, Miller & DeLackner 1934 (1)-(7) 2 Granville, Miller & DeLackner 1935 (1)(2) Edmund Jakobi 1934 Re: G.B. Plane Return from England Just, G.W. 1934 Leonard, Royal (Harlan Hull) 1934 London Flight - General (1)-(12) London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables General (1)-(5) [cable file of Royal Leonard, FBO’s London agent, re preparations for race] 3 London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Fueling Arrangements London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Hangar Arrangements London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Insurance [London - Melbourne Flight Instructions] (1)(2) McLeod, Fred B. [Fred McLeod Correspondence July - August 1934] (1)-(3) Joseph B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power for Flight: NASA's Contributions To
    The Power Power The forFlight NASA’s Contributions to Aircraft Propulsion for for Flight Jeremy R. Kinney ThePower for NASA’s Contributions to Aircraft Propulsion Flight Jeremy R. Kinney Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Kinney, Jeremy R., author. Title: The power for flight : NASA’s contributions to aircraft propulsion / Jeremy R. Kinney. Description: Washington, DC : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017027182 (print) | LCCN 2017028761 (ebook) | ISBN 9781626830387 (Epub) | ISBN 9781626830370 (hardcover) ) | ISBN 9781626830394 (softcover) Subjects: LCSH: United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration– Research–History. | Airplanes–Jet propulsion–Research–United States– History. | Airplanes–Motors–Research–United States–History. Classification: LCC TL521.312 (ebook) | LCC TL521.312 .K47 2017 (print) | DDC 629.134/35072073–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017027182 Copyright © 2017 by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the United States Government or of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC Table of Contents Dedication v Acknowledgments vi Foreword vii Chapter 1: The NACA and Aircraft Propulsion, 1915–1958.................................1 Chapter 2: NASA Gets to Work, 1958–1975 ..................................................... 49 Chapter 3: The Shift Toward Commercial Aviation, 1966–1975 ...................... 73 Chapter 4: The Quest for Propulsive Efficiency, 1976–1989 ......................... 103 Chapter 5: Propulsion Control Enters the Computer Era, 1976–1998 ........... 139 Chapter 6: Transiting to a New Century, 1990–2008 ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • The :TWA: Hotel's Lockheed Constellation
    The :TWA: Hotel’s Lockheed Constellation THE “CONNIE” FLIES THROUGH NYC John F. Kennedy International Airport New York City NYC’s Aviation Triumph The magic of the Jet Age returns to John F. Kennedy International Airport with a 19581956 Lockheed ✈ Constellation L-1649A Starliner (the “Connie”) positioned on the TWA Hotel’s tarmac outside the landmark 1962 TWA Flight Center. Known as the secret weapons of TWA’s former owner, Howard Hughes, the airline’s fleet of cutting-edge Constellation planes broke the era’s transcontinental speed record. The aircraft will make history again as the first Connie transformed into a cocktail lounge. 2 Project Overview The TWA Hotel (currently under development by MCR and MORSE Development) will feature a one-of-a-kind cocktail lounge inside the fuselage of a fully restored Lockheed Constellation L-1649A Starliner (the “Connie”). ✈ The exterior of the plane is fully restored, complete with authentic 1962 TWA livery, engines and propellers. ✈ The interior fuselage of the plane will be refurbished and designed as a high-end lounge with 30 to 40 seats. ✈ The Connie will sit on the TWA Hotel’s “tarmac” located just outside the lobby. 3 Project Overview ✈ MCR and MORSE Development purchased the ✈ In October 2018, the Connie will journey from Maine aircraft from Lufthansa in early 2018. through the heart of Manhattan and finally to the TWA • The plane is one of four remaining Lockheed Constellation Hotel at JFK Airport. L-1649As in the entire world (only 44 total were made). • The plane will travel down I-95 through the Bronx and into Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Horizons
    3 F R To properly plan for the future of Coolidge facilities will be evaluated in Chapter Four Municipal Airport, it is necessary to trans- to determine the most cost-effective and late forecast aviation demand into the efficient means for implementation. specific types and quantities of facilities that can adequately serve this identified demand. This chapter uses the results of the PLANNING HORIZONS forecasts conducted in Chapter Two, as well as established planning criteria, to The cost-effective, efficient, and orderly determine the airside (i.e., runways, development of an airport should rely more taxiways, navigational aids, marking and upon actual demand at an airport than on a lighting) and landside (i.e., terminal build- time-based forecast figure. In order to ing, hangars, aircraft parking apron, and develop a Master Plan that is demand-based automobile parking) facility requirements. rather than time-based, a series of planning horizon milestones have been established The objective of this effort is to identify, in for Coolidge Municipal Airport that take general terms, the adequacy of the existing into consideration the reasonable range of airport facilities, outline what new facilities aviation demand projections prepared in the may be needed, and when these may be previous chapter. needed to accommodate forecast demands. Having established these facility require- ments, alternatives for providing these 3-1 It is important to consider that the ac- airport to develop facilities according tual activity at the airport may be to need generated by actual demand higher or lower than projected activity levels. The demand-based schedule levels. By planning according to activ- provides flexibility in development, as ity milestones, the resulting plan can development schedules can be slowed accommodate unexpected shifts, or or expedited according to actual de- changes, in the area’s aviation de- mand at any given time during the mand.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C – Key Studies on Aircraft Deviation ACRP 4-09 - Risk Assessment Method to Support Modification of Airfield Separation Standards
    Appendix C – Key Studies on Aircraft Deviation ACRP 4-09 - Risk Assessment Method to Support Modification of Airfield Separation Standards The following table summarizes some of the most relevant studies addressing lateral aircraft deviations during runway, taxiway and taxilane operations. The models developed by Scholz (2003a and 2003b) were used in the approach to analyze taxiway and taxilane separations. Table C-1. Relevant studies on aircraft lateral deviation in airfields Title Year/Author Description Evaluation of Brown & This study was conducted with test sections for B-47 Existing Thompson, 1973 (Stratojet), B-52, KC-87, and KC-135 aircraft. The Airfields for C- report also makes reference to studies conducted in 1949 5A Operations and field observations carried out in 1956. The concept of wander was introduced. Wander was defined as “the maximum lateral movement of a point on the centerline of an aircraft about the centerline (or guideline) on taxiways or runways during operation of the aircraft.” The lateral deviations for those aircraft from the taxiway and runway centerlines can be considered as approximately 3.2 ft and 33.7 ft, respectively, during 75 percent of the time. Field Survey and HoSang, 1975 Deviation data were collected from 9 airports and 12 Analysis of types of commercial aircraft with maximum gross Aircraft weights above 50,000 pounds, including: Boeing 747, Distribution on 707, 727 and 737; McDonnell-Douglas DC-10, DC-8 and Airport DC-9; Lockheed L-1101; General Dynamics Convair 880 Pavements and 580; British Aircraft Corporation BAC-111; and Nihon YS-11. The standard deviations for individual aircraft types, compared at the various airports, varied from 3 to 8 ft for takeoffs and from 4 to 9 ft for landings.
    [Show full text]
  • Lockheed Constellation Was the Biggest, Most Power - Lockheed Had a Strong Leaning Towards Powerful, Fast Aircraft, and Ful and Most Expensive of All Airliners
    The World’s Greatest Aircraft ~__- ______I___l_i __ - Though it initially suffered from protracted technical problems, the ‘Connie’ became the best-loved piston-engine airliner of all, and, in its maker’s words, was ‘Queen of the Skies’. Finally, while commercial Connies were slowly rotting away, military examples of a dozen species were working unnoticed around the clock. In its day the Lockheed Constellation was the biggest, most power - Lockheed had a strong leaning towards powerful, fast aircraft, and ful and most expensive of all airliners. But it avoided joining the had pioneered pressure cabins with the XC-35 flown in May 1937. list of unsuccessful giants, because at first its capacity was not so Nothing much could be done until suddenly on 9 June 1939 the great as to frighten the airlines. The ‘Connie’, as it was affection - company was visited by the famed Howard Hughes, who had ately known, was made possible by the development of engines of secretly bought most of the stock of TWA, and Jack Frye, whom he great power, and this power was used for speed, and to lift fuel for had appointed president. long range whilst cruising in pressurized comfort at high altitude. Hughes had lately given Lockheed a giant boost by flying a Once the basic type was established, Lockheed met the demand for Model 14 airliner around the world in record time. TWA was in greater capacity by introducing one of the first and greatest of all severe trouble with money and route competition, and Hughes ‘stretching’ programmes to yield the ‘Super Connie’, seating up to urged the development of a new super -luxury transport that could 100 or more.
    [Show full text]