DOCSLIB.ORG

In the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico Case 1:20-cv-01289-MV-JHR Document 12 Filed 12/22/20 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 1:20-cv-01289-MV v. MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of New Mexico, the ELECTORS of NEW MEXICO and the STATE CANVASSING BOARD OF NEW MEXICO, Defendants. THE DNC’S MOTION TO INTERVENE AS DEFENDANTS AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24, the DNC Services Corporation/Democratic National Committee (the “DNC”) files this Motion to Intervene in this action as a matter of right or, alternatively, to permissively intervene. The DNC has conferred with counsel for Defendants, who have no objection to this Motion. The DNC has also conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and Plaintiff has not yet taken a position on this Motion. In support of its Motion to Intervene, the DNC respectfully submits the following: Case 1:20-cv-01289-MV-JHR Document 12 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 2 III. ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................................... 4 A. The DNC is entitled to intervene as of right. .......................................................... 4 1. The DNC’s motion to intervene is timely. .................................................. 6 2. The DNC has a significant protectible interest in the outcome of the litigation. ..................................................................................................... 6 3. Denial of the motion to intervene will impair the DNC’s ability to protect its interests. ................................................................................................. 8 4. The DNC’s interests are not adequately represented by Defendants. ......... 9 B. The DNC is also entitled to permissive intervention. ........................................... 11 IV. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 12 i Case 1:20-cv-01289-MV-JHR Document 12 Filed 12/22/20 Page 3 of 17 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Citizens for Balanced Use v. Mont. Wilderness Ass’n, 647 F.3d 893 (9th Cir. 2011) .....................................................................................................9 City of Stilwell v. Ozarks Rural Elec. Coop., 79 F.3d 1038 (10th Cir.1996) ..................................................................................................11 Cook Cnty. Republican Party v. Pritzker, No. 20-cv-4676 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 28, 2020), ECF No. 37 ............................................................5 Crawford v. Marion Cnty. Election Bd., 553 U.S. 181 (2008) ...................................................................................................................8 DCCC v. Ziriax, No. 20-CV-211-JED-JFJ, 2020 WL 5569576 (N.D. Okla. Sept. 17, 2020), ECF No. 56 ......................................................................................................6 Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., No. 20-cv10753, 2020 WL 5229209 (D. N.J. Sept. 01, 2020) .............................................................................................................5 Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Benson, No. 1:20-cv-01083-JTN-PJG, ECF No. 20 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 17, 2020) .................................5 Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, No. 4:20-cv-02078-MWB, ECF No. 72 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 12, 2020) ..........................................5 Donald J. Trump for President v. Bullock, No. 20-cv-66 (D. Mont. Sept. 08, 2020), ECF No. 35 ...............................................................5 Issa v. Newsom, No. 20-cv-01044-MCE-CKD, 2020 WL 3074351 (E.D. Cal. June 10, 2020) ....................5, 11 Kane Cty. v. United States, 928 F.3d 877 (10th Cir. 2019) ......................................................................................... passim King v. Whitmer, No. 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW, ECF No. 28 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 7, 2020) ..................................5 NEOCH v. Husted, 696 F.3d 580 (6th Cir. 2012) .....................................................................................................8 Paher v. Cegavske, No. 20-cv-00243-MMD-WGC, 2020 WL 2042365 (D. Nev. Apr. 28, 2020)...........................5 Parnell v. Allegheny Bd. of Elections, No. 20-cv-01570 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 22, 2020), ECF No. 34 ..........................................................5 ii Case 1:20-cv-01289-MV-JHR Document 12 Filed 12/22/20 Page 4 of 17 Pearson v. Kemp, 1:20-cv-04809-TCB, ECF No. 42 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 2, 2020) ......................................................5 Tex. Democratic Party v. Benkiser, 459 F.3d 582 (5th Cir. 2006) .....................................................................................................8 Trbovich v. United Mine Wkers., 404 U.S. 528 (1972) ...................................................................................................................9 Utah Ass’n of Ctys. v. Clinton, 255 F.3d 1246 (10th Cir. 2001) ...........................................................................................6, 10 WildEarth Guardians v. Nat’l Park Serv., 604 F.3d 1192 ........................................................................................................................8, 9 WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Forest Serv., 573 F.3d 992 ............................................................................................................................10 Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 1:20-CV-04651-SDG, 2020 WL 6817513 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 20, 2020), aff’d, No. 20-14418, 2020 WL 7094866 (11th Cir. Dec. 5, 2020) ............................................4 STATUTES 3 U.S.C. §§ 1-11 ................................................................................................................3, 7, 8, 10 52 U.S.C. § 30101 ............................................................................................................................1 N.M. Stat. § 1-12-72 ........................................................................................................................2 N.M. Stat. § 1-12-72(O) ...................................................................................................................2 N.M. Stat. §§ 1-13-13–15 ................................................................................................................3 N.M. Stat. § 1-14-14 ........................................................................................................................3 N.M. Stat. §§ 1-15-1–10 ................................................................................................................10 OTHER AUTHORITIES Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 (1966 Amendment) ............................................................................................9 Fed R. Civ. P. 24(a)(2) .............................................................................................................2, 4, 8 Fed R. Civ. P. 24(b) ...................................................................................................................2, 11 Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b)(1)(B) and (b)(3) ...........................................................................................11 Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(c) ........................................................................................................................2 iii Case 1:20-cv-01289-MV-JHR Document 12 Filed 12/22/20 Page 5 of 17 I. INTRODUCTION On December 14, 2020, the Electoral College met in accordance with federal law to cast ballots for President and Vice President and carry out the will of the American people as expressed in the November election. Along with three hundred and one other Electors, all of New Mexico’s Electors cast their ballots for and formally elected Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as the next President and Vice President of the United States. On that same day, the losing presidential campaign, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. (the “Campaign”), filed this action seeking— somehow, someway—to defy the expressed will of New Mexico’s voters and undo and overturn the votes cast by New Mexico’s Electors. This timing on behalf of the Campaign was no mistake— indeed, it is part and parcel of the increasingly desperate, and apparently bottomless, efforts by the Campaign and its allies to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. In its oddly-styled Amended “Complaint” slash “Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order or, Alternatively, for Stay and Administrative Stay,” the Campaign boldly asserts that it is entitled to “disregard” federal statutes and disenfranchise almost a million New Mexicans who voted in the Presidential Election. See Compl. ¶ 32, B-E. For myriad reasons, Proposed Intervenor DNC Services Corporation/Democratic National Committee (the “DNC”) has a significant and protectable interest in the outcome of this litigation. The DNC is a national committee, as that term is defined by and used in 52 U.S.C. § 30101, dedicated to electing local, state, and national candidates of the Democratic Party, including President-Elect Biden and Vice-President-Elect Harris, to public office throughout the United States.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Convention
    How to Become a State & National Delegate Presented by Adi Ben-Yehoshua Indiana Democratic Party Data Director What this training will cover State Convention National Convention Representation and Next Steps What happens at State Who makes up our delegation Diversity Goals What you should be doing now What our delegation will strive Convention and how to become and how to become a National to prepare to run to be a to look like a State Delegate Delegate delegate Helpful Information National Convention 2020 Page indems.org -> Events -> National Convention 2020 State Convention 2020 Page indems.org -> Events -> State Convention Adi Ben-Yehoshua [email protected] State Convention 2020 Indiana Democratic State Convention June 13, 2020 Indiana Convention Center What Happens at State Convention Congressional District Constituency Caucus Convention General Session Meetings Meetings Committee Meetings Voting, speeches by Contact IDP to have Credentials Adoption of candidates, official caucus meeting Rules Platform and district business scheduled Resolutions Resolutions Where voting on Nomination of district-level Lieutenant National Delegates Governor and takes place Attorney General Other Things at State Convention Hoosier Hospitality Dinner IYD After Party Speeches Vendors Current Night before Right after HH Will have area for officeholders, convention, highly Dinner, highly vendors for candidates for recommend recommend campaigns office, special guests Becoming a State Convention Delegate What does a State Delegate do? Vote on Vote on Vote on
    [Show full text]
  • Precinct Committeeperson and Activist Handbook & Resource Guide
    Precinct Committeeperson and Activist Handbook & Resource Guide Precinct Committeeperson /Volunteer: County and Precinct: 110 W Washington St. Suite 1110 East Indianapolis, IN 46204 Ph: (317) 231-7100 Fax: (317) 231-7129 www.indems.org [email protected] Paid for by the Indiana Democratic Party, www.indems.org, John Zody, Chair. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee. Table of Contents Chapters 1. This Handbook & Resource Guide: General Overview of the Handbook 2. What It Means To Be A Democrat: Party Values and Space for Candidate Materials 3. The Basics: The Precinct, Party Organization, Job Description, Essential Functions, Election Year Responsibilities, Qualifications, Becoming a Precinct Committeeperson, Term of Office and Privileges 4. Getting Started: Know Your Precinct, Know Your Precinct Demographics, Know Your Neighbors, Know Your Local Election Laws, Know the Issues and Know the Party Organization 5. Effective Canvassing: Canvassing, The Importance of Canvassing, Recruiting Volunteers, Neighborhood / Block Captains, Providing Service, Canvassing Tools and Tips, Canvassing Techniques: Walking, Calling and House Parties and Reading the Voters 6. Registering Voters: Voter Registration Tips, Frequently Asked Questions: Voter Registration, Increasing Democratic Registration and Voting Information 7. Candidate Support: Supporting Candidates, Qualifying, Campaigning: Walking, Calling, Emailing, House Parties, Fundraising, Publicity, Other Ways You Can Help, Ballot Issues and Non-Partisan Races 8. Winning Elections: Field Efforts and Teamwork, Absentee Voting, Get Out The Vote and Frequently Asked Questions: Voting 9. Recruiting Volunteers: The Importance of Volunteers, Phone Other Democrats, Approaching Volunteers, Handling Volunteers and Recruiting Tips 10. Other Opportunities for Involvement: List of Other Opportunities, Overall Precinct Committeeperson Duties 11. Important Contact Information: State Party Headquarters, Your County Party, Your District Party, State Elected Officials, District, County, City Elected Officials 12.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Rules of the Indiana Democratic Party
    February 2021 Rules of the Indiana Democratic Party PLEASE NOTE: In December 2020, the State Central Committee passed two supplemental rules regarding reorganization that can be found in the accompanying 2021 Reorganization Guide on the IDP website where these rules are found. Those should be viewed in conjunction with these rules when planning for 2021 Reorganization meetings. These supplemental rules relate (generally) to timing of county reorganization meetings and proxies at county reorganization meetings. 1 February 2021 Table of Contents Page Rules 3 I. Party Structure 3 Rule 1. Party Composition 3 II. Party Governance 3 Rule 2. Applicability of Rules 3 Rule 3. State Committee Authority Over Rules 3 Rule 4. Adoption of Supplemental Rules 3 Rule 5. Rule Conflicts Between Committees 3 Rule 6. Rules of Order 3 Rule 7. Acceptance of Rules 4 III. Membership & Party office 4 Rule 8. Eligibility for Membership & Party offices 4 IV. Statements of Principle 4 Rule 9. Gender Equality 4 Rule 10. Party Access 5 V. Party Committees 5 Rule 11. Precinct Committees 7 Rule 12. Town or city committees 8 Rule 13. County Committees 13 Rule 14. District Committees 15 Rule 15. State Committee 19 Rule 16. National Committee 20 VI. The State Convention 20 Rule 17. State Convention 23 VII. Vacancies 23 Rule 18. Candidate and Elected Officeholder Vacancies 30 VIII. Removal 30 Rule 19. Removal of Party Officers 34 IX. Controversies 34 Rule 20. Controversies 35 X. Miscellaneous Provisions 35 Rule 21. Proxies 36 Rule 22. Quorum and Voting 36 Rule 23. Secret Ballots 36 Rule 24. Changes of office Provided in writing 36 Rule 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Rights and the Primary Election of 1964 in Indiana: the Wallace Challenge* Matthew E
    Civil Rights and the Primary Election of 1964 in Indiana: The Wallace Challenge* Matthew E. Welsh** In the spring of 1964 Democratic Governor George Corley Wallace of Alabama announced that he was going to campaign for the presidency of the United States, opposing President Lyndon B. Johnson, also a Democrat. Wallace had become a national figure by defying the United States Supreme Court in refusing admission of Negro students to the University of Ala- bama, and his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomi- nation had obvious overtones of racial intolerance which I found most disturbing. Indiana had come a long way since the adoption of its Constitution of 1851, Article XI11 of which barred Negroes and mulattoes from entering the state. At that time blacks already living in the state, many of whom had been born here, were not regarded as citizens. They could neither vote nor hold public office. They could not serve on juries or in the militia, and they were barred from public schools.' Article XI11 was voided by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1866. The General Assembly authorized school integration in 1877, prohibited discrimination in enjoyment of public accommodations in 1885, and in 1963 created the Indiana Civil Rights Commission with broad pow- ers and an adequate budget.2 The record also disclosed, how- ever, that the statewide referendum in 1936 approving amend- ment of the Constitution to permit Negroes to be members of * This article is an account of the 1964 primary election in Indiana as experienced and remembered by one of the major participants in the campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics Indiana
    Politics Indiana V14 N44 Tuesday, June 24, 2008 JLT labors under the unity facade UAW, Schellinger don’t join Jill’s Convention confab By RYAN NEES INDIANAPOLIS - Jill Long Thompson has work still to do with the party faithful, who at the state convention Saturday appeared more swept by the candidacy of Barack Obama and even the muted appearances by the Hoosier Congressional delegation than of Indiana’s first female gubernato- rial nominee. And behind the scenes, the machinery of the Democratic establishment still appears to be exacting upon her nothing short of malicious ven- geance. The candidate was met with polite ap- plause as she toured district and interest group caucus meetings, but skepticism persisted especially amongst the roughly half of the party that supported her opponent in Indiana’s May primary. That unease was punctuated dramatically by the UAW’s refusal to endorse her candidacy the morning of the conven- tion, a move that appeared designed to rain on the nominee’s parade. Jill Long Thompson listens to her brother talk about her life and candidacy The UAW’s support provided vital to archi- just prior to taking the stage Saturday at the Indiana Democratic Conven- tect Jim Schellinger’s primary tion. (HPI Photo by Brian A. Howey) campaign, which received See Page 4 Back home again with Jill By BRIAN A. HOWEY NASHVILLE, Ind. - In the Hoosier brand of guber- natorial politics, home is where the heart is. We remember Frank O’Bannon talking about his “wired” barn down near Corydon. In January 2005, Mitch Daniels talked about an “These days many politicians Amish-style barn raising.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the People Are So Damn Angry New Economic Realities Putting the ‘American Dream’ out of Reach of the Middle Class by BRIAN A
    V21, 39 Thursday, June 9, 2016 Why the people are so damn angry New economic realities putting the ‘American Dream’ out of reach of the middle class By BRIAN A. HOWEY MICHIGAN CITY, Ind. – Ameri- cans and Hoosiers are angry. They are seeking political retribution. They are finding Republican presidential nomi- nee Donald Trump as the answer. But the critical question that has remained largely unanswered is why? Why are We the People so pissed off? Appearing at two events in Angry Donald Trump supporters confront U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz in Marion on the eve of the Elkhart last week, President Barack Indiana primary on May 2 Obama laid out the template for the doesn’t always yield the wisest decision making. sizzling anger that is fueling one of the most unpredict- At the Lerner Theater in Elkhart, PBS moderator able political climates in modern times. And Prof. Robert J. Gwen Ifill listened as Obama made what Howey Politics In- Gordon of Northwestern University, a macroeconomist and diana called an “economic victory lap,” where the president economic historian, supplies an array of data that helps reminded the Republican-dominated county that the 20% understand why the political decisions of 2016 are almost Continued on page 4 certainly being framed in the context of an emotion which Party of Lincoln stained By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – On May 17, 1860, the Repub- lican convention campaign team of native son Abraham Lincoln met with the Indiana and Pennsylvania delega- tions in Chicago. What emerged hours later was that the Hoosier delegation would vote “Oh, look at my African-Ameri- as a solid bloc for the president who would go on to become the can over here.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor Previews Legislative Goals Pence Will Focus on Jobs and Education by BRIAN A
    V19, N13 Thursday, Nov. 14, 2013 Governor previews legislative goals Pence will focus on jobs and education By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – Gov. Mike Pence’s second Indiana Gen- eral Assembly agenda will feature legislation on jobs and education. In an exclusive interview with Howey Politics Indiana on Wednesday, Pence held a stuffed manila folder he said contained much of his agenda. “I could tell you everything, but then I’d have to kill you,” he joked. Pence said he would unveil more details in early December when he gives what he calls “a major address that will outline our agenda.” But, he added, “I can tell you in very broad strokes a couple of things. My focus is going to be on jobs and schools. We’re going to continue to drive toward the six office 10 months ago, the Roadmap has had a prominent goals in our Roadmap for Indiana and our advanced poli- station in his Statehouse office on an easel. cies about that.” The priorities include: The Pence “Roadmap” began as a 2012 campaign 1.) Increasing private sector employment: As brochure outlining his policy priorities. But since he took Continued on page 3 Pence will seek reelection By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – Gov. Mike Pence plans to seek a second term in 2016, with senior administration officials dousing any notion of a potential presidential run. “Gov. Pence, through his newly “Follow the money,” a senior Pence administration official told Howey Politics Indiana on created education agency, the Wednesday. Center for Education and Career While Pence has a national political action committee that could raise fed- Innovation, is undermining the eral election money, the source told exceptional work done every day by HPI that all of the governor’s fundrais- ing activity is related to his Indiana the Department of Education.” gubernatorial campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Howey Political Report Is Published by Newslink Ination, Indiana Sen
    Thursday, March 11, 2004 Volume 10, Number 29 Page 1 of 10 he Rating Bayh’s odds T for Kerry’s ticket Howey Key question: Could he carry Indiana? By BRIAN A. HOWEY in Indianapolis and MARK SCHOEFF JR. in Washington Arianna Huffington has written to U.S. Sen. John Political Kerry telling him to forget Evan Bayh. University of Virginia Prof. Larry Sabato said that Al Gore would have won in 2000 if Bayh had been on the ticket. The Hill gives Report Bayh 4:1 odds of making the cut, best on its list. In the race for the Democratic vice presidential nom- The Howey Political Report is published by NewsLink ination, Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh ranks high on the buzz list Inc. Founded in 1994, The Howey Political Report is in Washington. “I'd put him in the top half-dozen. He's on an independent, non-partisan newsletter analyzing the political process in Indiana. virtually every top 10 list,” said Joe Romer, a capital denizen who's worked in Hoosier Democratic politics for 35 years. Brian A. Howey, publisher “Bayh is a very capable guy. He's got a great resume. On Mark Schoeff Jr., Washington writer balance, he brings huge assets to the ticket.” Jack E. Howey, editor Romer's list of Bayh's strengths include a moderate voting record, executive experience as governor, a telegenic, The Howey Political Report Office: 317-254-1533 PO Box 40265 Fax: 317-968-0487 articulate demeanor, security policy background developed Indianapolis, IN 46240-0265 Mobile: 317-506-0883 through his positions on the Senate Armed Services and [email protected] Intelligence committees, the regional balance he would pro- www.howeypolitics.com vide for Kerry, his clean record and his relative youth.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIANA's 1988 GUBERNATORIAL RESIDENCY CHALLENGE Joseph
    INDIANA’S 1988 GUBERNATORIAL RESIDENCY CHALLENGE Joseph Hadden Hogsett Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of History Indiana University June 2007 Accepted by the Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Robert G. Barrows, Ph.D., Chair Elizabeth Brand Monroe, Ph.D. Master’s Thesis Committee William A. Blomquist, Ph.D. ii Dedicated to the memory of my colleague and friend, Jon D. Krahulik iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I take this opportunity to thank the people who helped make this paper possible. Dr. Robert G. Barrows served as my seminar professor, my mentor and the Chair of this thesis committee. Many other graduate students have acknowledged his sound advice, his guidance, his editing and his sense of humor. All of those also apply here. In my case, however, above all, I owe him a debt of gratitude for patience. This paper began as a concept in his seminar in the spring of 2002, but was not finished for five years. Even if Dr. Barrows had known then how flawed and distracted the author would prove to be, I am convinced he still would have agreed to chair the project. His patience is a gift. I also acknowledge the advice offered unconditionally by the committee’s other members, Dr. Elizabeth Brand Monroe and Dr. William A. Blomquist. Though they, like Dr. Barrows, possessed sufficient probable cause to notify authorities of a “missing person”, both exercised incredible restraint and, in so doing, no doubt violated some antiquainted canon of academic protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • Era Record Fifth Cycle of GOP Dominance Stresses the Statehouse Process by BRIAN A
    V26, N32 Thursday, April 15, 2021 Deep into the ‘Super Majority’ era Record fifth cycle of GOP dominance stresses the Statehouse process By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – In the state’s 205th year, we are now in the “Super Majority Era” of governance. While there have been 20 Democratic House and Senate super majorities, and 49 for Republicans over the past two centuries, never have these decks been stacked like they are today with both chambers a deep House Speaker Todd Huston (left) and Senate President Pro Tem Rod Bray crimson red for the past four cycles. have had to lead super majority GOP caucuses since taking their helms. According to former speakers Brian 21 sine die, Huston and Bray are attempting to shepherd Bosma and John Gregg, current Speaker Todd Huston and their super majority caucuses (39 in the Senate, 71 in the Senate President Pro Tempore Rod Bray are working with House) on an array of issues that could alter the state’s fu- caucuses that are too big. As the General Assembly heads toward an April Continued on page 3 The book of Pence By JACK COLWELL SOUTH BEND – We know some things about the autobiography former Vice President Mike Pence is writing. We know the title won’t be one of those suggested by the late-night TV hosts or on Twitter. “There just seems to be no Some of those suggestions: “I Did It His Way.” “Lord of the Flies.” “Thank you, balance anymore in this build- Sir. Can I Have Another?” Nor will ing.” there be, as Jimmy Fallon sug- gests, a chapter on “how his boss - State Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • HPI Forecast: Super Majority Hold Bers
    V20, N13 Thursday Oct. 30, 2014 HPI forecast: Super majority hold bers. Walorski expected to fend And the 2014 off Bock; Dems could pick up midterm? A compara- tive yawner. House seats, but not enough; Yes there is the historic all-female Senate eyes on 3 river races Republican statewide ticket, with this trio of By BRIAN A. HOWEY Connie Lawson, Kelly ENGLISH, Ind. – In the 2008 election Mitchell and Suzanne cycle, we had the epic Barack Obama/Hillary Crouch expected to Clinton presidential primary, and then Obama prevail. broke a 44-year Republican lock on Indiana’s Yes, there are Electoral College vote as the Obamas, Clintons, a cluster of Indiana McCains and Palins made more than 150 cam- House seats where paign appearances on Hoosier soil. Democrats are In the 2010 midterms, the Republicans pressing Republican stormed back, taking two Congressional seats, incumbents like Reps. Evan Bayh’s Senate seat and a 60-40 major- Ed Soliday and Hal ity in the Indiana House. In 2012, we had the Slager in The Region. $50 million U.S. Senate race that saw Rich- HPI is forecasting the historic all-female GOP ticket of There’s another set ard Mourdock depose Sen. Dick Lugar in the treasurer nominee Kelly Mitchell, Secretary of State of Indiana Senate primary, only to blunder and watch Democrat Connie Lawson, and Auditor Suzanne Crouch to prevail, seats along the Ohio Joe Donnelly capture the seat, saw Mike and House and Senate super majorities to hold River that are tos- Pence become the first governor in half a century without 50 percent of the vote, and Continued on page 3 Republicans took super majorities in both legislative cham- Indiana Democrats struggle By CHRIS SAUTTER WASHINGTON – There’s a little known fact about Democratic congressional challengers in Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-Year-End-Political-Report.Pdf
    1 Verizon Political Activity January – December 2017 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies -- from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more -- that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 18 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon and its affiliates during 2017. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Executive Vice President, Public Policy and General Counsel 2 Verizon Political Activity January – December 2017 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Democratic Process What are the Verizon Political Action Committees? including the setting of monetary contribution limitations and The Verizon Political Action Committees (PACs) exist to help the establishment of periodic reporting requirements.
    [Show full text]