DOCSLIB.ORG

Table S1. Clinicopathological Characterization of 99 Leiomyosarcoma Cases. STT Lib.Name Location Grade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table S1. Clinicopathological Characterization of 99 Leiomyosarcoma Cases. STT Lib.Name Location Grade Table S1. Clinicopathological characterization of 99 Leiomyosarcoma cases. Subtypes from Age Prior Consensus Silhouette STT Lib.name Location Grade (years) Sex Relapse therapy Clustering value 5858 STT5858_LMS Uterine Low 51 Female Primary No I 0.125666992 5840 STT5840_LMS Extremities High 58 Female Primary No I 0.113624441 5836 STT5836_LMS Uterine Low 48 Female Primary No I 0.087137194 5859 STT5859_LMS Uterine High 40 Female Primary No I 0.0834868 5977 STT5977_LMS Extremities Low 21 Female Primary No I 0.083093565 5980 STT5980_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal Low 51 Female Primary No I 0.080408626 5528 STT5528_LMS Extremities Intermediate 78 Male Local recur NA I 0.073772216 516 STT516_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal high 68 Female Local recur No I 0.07061551 5841 STT5841_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal High 74 Male Primary No I 0.070152611 6044 STT6044_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal low 42 Female Local recur No I 0.069310086 6027 STT6027_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal low 78 Male Local recur Yes I 0.0611887 6023 STT6023_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal Intermediate 68 Female Met Yes I 0.060305089 6045 STT6045_LMS Extremities Intermediate 56 Male Met Yes I 0.050367868 5862 STT5862_LMS Uterine High 46 Female Primary No I 0.048356007 5976 STT5976_LMS Extremities Intermediate 81 Male Primary No I 0.048039714 5986 STT5986_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal Intermediate 58 Male Primary No I 0.047491088 5846 STT5846_LMS Extremities Intermediate 46 Male Primary No I 0.044706292 6024 STT6024_LMS Unknown Intermediate 44 Female Met Yes I 0.043907123 5860 STT5860_LMS Uterine High 40 Female Met No I 0.043778974 6047 STT6047_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal low 63 Female Local recur No I 0.043567402 5843 STT5843_LMS Extremities High 84 Male Primary No I 0.042812811 5985 STT5985_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal Low 63 Female Primary No I 0.040251958 5851 STT5851_LMS Extremities High 65 Male Local recur No I 0.036103313 5863 STT5863_LMS Uterine High 35 Female Primary No I 0.035922655 5978 STT5978_LMS Extremities High 65 Female Primary No I 0.035346643 6046 STT6046_LMS Uterine Intermediate 53 Female Local recur No I 0.025546256 5855 STT5855_LMS Extremities High 56 Female Primary No I 0.023343122 5861 STT5861_LMS Uterine High 44 Female Primary No I 0.023081575 5975 STT5975_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal Intermediate 52 Male Primary No I 0.016164913 5981 STT5981_LMS Extremities High 73 Male Primary No I 0.015302853 6794 STT6794_LMS Uterine High 55 Female Primary No I 0.013749464 6035 STT6035_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal low 53 Female Primary No I 0.012552951 6036 STT6036_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal low 2 Female Primary No I 0.005798847 6021 STT6021_LMS Extremities high 81 Male Local recur NA I 0.004793186 5842 STT5842_LMS Extremities Intermediate 42 Male Local recur No I 0.00183114 6037 STT6037_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal Intermediate 94 Female Local recur No I ‐0.002303405 5838 STT5838_LMS Uterine High 64 Female Primary No I ‐0.003689111 5849 STT5849_LMS Extremities Low 38 Female Primary No I ‐0.007691372 6093 STT6093_LMS Extremities High 68 Female Primary No I ‐0.016743075 6799 STT6799_LMS Uterine High 57 Female Primary No I ‐0.017815515 6040 STT6040_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal high 45 Female Met No I ‐0.018449475 6779 STT6779_LMS Uterine High 57 Female Primary No I ‐0.019223609 5847 STT5847_LMS Extremities Intermediate 52 Female Local recur No I ‐0.023447131 6028 STT6028_LMS Uterine high 47 Female Local recur Yes I ‐0.026580215 6795 STT6795_LMS Uterine Low 65 Female Primary No I ‐0.035675753 5856 STT5856_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal High 67 Male Primary No I ‐0.036630406 5844 STT5844_LMS Extremities High 85 Male Primary No I ‐0.038219004 6025 STT6025_LMS Uterine high 52 Female Met Yes I ‐0.043624331 6029 STT6029_LMS Uterine high 39 Female Met No I ‐0.053120449 5837 STT5837_LMS Uterine High 55 Female Primary No I ‐0.059455969 5848 STT5848_LMS Extremities High 53 Male Primary No I ‐0.061915752 6096 STT6096_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal High 67 Female Primary No I ‐0.063337165 5845 STT5845_LMS Extremities High 72 Male Primary No I ‐0.068247842 5852 STT5852_LMS Extremities High 60 Female Primary No I ‐0.076071787 5839 STT5839_LMS Extremities High 50 Female Primary No I ‐0.089352234 6798 STT6798_LMS Uterine High 56 Female Primary No I ‐0.096945871 6803 STT6803_LMS Uterine High 54 Female Primary No II 0.201993776 6049 STT6049_LMS Uterine high 44 Female Local recur No II 0.186594445 6802 STT6802_LMS Uterine High 58 Female Primary No II 0.1775918 6038 STT6038_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal Intermediate 48 Male Local recur Yes II 0.16107199 6039 STT6039_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal high 59 Male Local recur No II 0.158447098 6784 STT6784_LMS Uterine High 50 Female Primary No II 0.157304316 6050 STT6050_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal low 67 Female Local recur No II 0.150862931 6788 STT6788_LMS Uterine Low 59 Female Primary No II 0.148595072 6032 STT6032_LMS Extremities high 43 Male Local recur No II 0.1439824 6034 STT6034_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal high 50 Female Local recur No II 0.134235712 6041 STT6041_LMS Uterine Intermediate 47 Female Local recur No II 0.133387215 6805 STT6805_LMS Uterine High 48 Female Primary No II 0.125907512 6043 STT6043_LMS Uterine low 57 Female Local recur Yes II 0.116911639 6801 STT6801_LMS Uterine High 51 Female Primary No II 0.113703303 6030 STT6030_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal Intermediate 57 Female Local recur Yes II 0.108366137 6033 STT6033_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal high 66 Female Local recur No II 0.102841058 6650 STT6650_LMS Uterine High 56 Female Primary No II 0.097045936 6652 STT6652_LMS Uterine High 41 Female Primary No II 0.093357847 6620 STT6620_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal high 63 Male Local recur No II 0.085595688 6806 STT6806_LMS Uterine High 56 Female Primary No II 0.084901255 6022 STT6022_LMS Uterine Intermediate 57 Female Met Yes II 0.077669139 1220 STT1220_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal high 46 Female Local recur No II 0.029450414 6804 STT6804_LMS Uterine Low 60 Female Primary No III 0.262114051 6780 STT6780_LMS Uterine High 47 Female Primary No III 0.250516979 6796 STT6796_LMS Uterine High 46 Female Primary No III 0.245780946 6782 STT6782_LMS Uterine High 65 Female Primary No III 0.243962292 5834 STT5834_LMS Uterine High 57 Female Primary No III 0.241472767 5857 STT5857_LMS Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal High 55 Male Primary No III 0.233951621 6775 STT6775_LMS Uterine High 70 Female Primary No III 0.179026041 6778 STT6778_LMS Uterine High 73 Female Primary No III 0.172778217 5835 STT5835_LMS Uterine low 61 Female Primary No III 0.127437241 6789 STT6789_LMS Uterine Low 57 Female Primary No III 0.097159818 6783 STT6783_LMS Uterine High 43 Female Met Yes III 0.060686741 6791 STT6791_LMS Uterine High 69 Female Primary No III 0.015848024 6776 STT6776_LMS Uterine High 80 Female Primary No III 0.002436252 6785 STT6785_LMS Uterine High 42 Female Met No III ‐0.009570967 5979 STT5979_LMS Extremities Intermediate 59 Male Local recur No III ‐0.041675365 6048 STT6048_LMS Uterine Intermediate 54 Female Local recur No III ‐0.051217895 6781 STT6781_LMS Uterine High 68 Female Primary No III ‐0.071479456 5854 STT5854_LMS Extremities High 83 Female Primary No III ‐0.074671556 5853 STT5853_LMS Uterine Intermediate 68 Female Local recur No III ‐0.14943816 6777 STT6777_LMS Uterine High 53 Female Primary No III ‐0.156690731 6651 STT6651_LMS Uterine High 46 Female Primary No III ‐0.22152812 Table S2. Patient clinical features for TCGA dataset (N=82). No. of Patients Percent (%) C3 (subtype I) C1 (subtype II) C2 (subtype III) LMS with Neg sil width Sex Female 43 52% 17 12 6 8 Male 21 26% 14 4 0 3 NA 18 22% 7 5 6 0 Location Uterine 19 23% 2 6 6 5 Thoracic/Abdominal/Retroperitoneal 32 39% 22 5 0 5 Extremities 13 16% 7 5 0 1 NA 18 22% 7 5 6 0 Relapse Primary 80 98% 37 21 11 11 recurent 2 2% 1 0 1 0 Prior therapy Yes 14 17% 5 4 3 2 No 33 40% 20 9 0 4 NA 35 43% 13 8 9 5 Total 82 38 21 12 11 Table S3.The number of overlapping genes by SAMSeq analysis between 3SEQ and TCGA RNASeq datasets. Subtype I‐3SEQ Subtype II‐3SEQ Subtype III‐3SEQ TCGA‐C3 (Subtype I) 2282 870 392 TCGA‐C1 (Subtype II) 1098 2075 230 TCGA‐C2 (Subtype III) 292 297 75 Table S4. Comparison of expression profiles between TCGA subtypes with SAMSeq. TCGA‐C3 (corresponding 3SEQ subtype I) vs. other TCGA subtypes Gene ID Score(d) Fold Change (C3/others) qvalue(%) LMOD1|25802 528.7 13.6986 0 MYLK|4638 402.1 13.5135 0 ACTG2|72 437.25 5.2083 0 CASQ2|845 516.95 166.6667 0 CFL2|1073 546.35 3.8168 0 SLMAP|7871 568.65 7.9365 0 TCGA‐C1 (corresponding 3SEQ subtype II) vs. other TCGA subtypes Gene ID Score(d) Fold Change (C1/others) qvalue(%) ARL4C|10123 436.2 8.333333333 0 Table S5. SAMSeq results between different LMS subtypes in 3SEQ data. Note before read this table: 1. SAMSeq was used to test the significance of differential expression between different LMS subtypes. E.g. "Subtype I vs. Others " is the comparsion between subtype I LMS and other LMS cases. 2. Genes were ranked by the SAMSeq significance, positive value means that this gene is significantly over‐expressed in second group, minus value means that gene is over‐expressed in first group. E.g. gene APLP2 is over‐expressed in Subtype I LMS with rank 5900, is also over‐expressed in Subtyp II iwith rank 3099, but is down‐expressed in Subtype III with rank 1549. 3. Increased absolute values of ranks from rank 1 to 10 (or ‐1 to ‐10), indicate decreased significances. Genes with rank 1 or ‐1 are most significant one from SAMSeq output.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Immunogenetics
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Immunogenetics. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 August 01. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Immunogenetics. 2012 August ; 64(8): 647–652. doi:10.1007/s00251-012-0626-0. A VpreB3 homologue from a marsupial, the gray short-tailed opossum, Monodelphis domestica Xinxin Wang, Zuly E. Parra, and Robert D. Miller Center for Evolutionary & Theoretical Immunology, Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA Robert D. Miller: [email protected] Abstract A VpreB surrogate light (SL) chain was identified for the first time in a marsupial, the opossum Monodelphis domestica. Comparing the opossum VpreB to homologues from eutherian (placental mammals) and avian species supported the marsupial gene being VpreB3. VpreB3 is a protein that is not known to traffic to the cell surface as part of the pre-B cell receptor. Rather, VpreB3 associates with nascent immunoglobulin (Ig) chains in the endoplasmic reticulum. Homologues of other known SL chains VpreB1, VpreB2, and λ5, which are found in eutherian mammals, were not found in the opossum genome, nor have they been identified in the genomes of non-mammals. VpreB3 likely evolved from earlier gene duplication, independent of that which generated VpreB1 and VpreB2 in eutherians. The apparent absence of VpreB1, VpreB2, and λ5 in marsupials suggests that an extra-cellular pre-B cell receptor containing SL chains, as it has been defined in humans and mice, may be unique to eutherian mammals. In contrast, the conservation of VpreB3 in marsupials and its presence in non-mammals is consistent with previous hypotheses that it is playing a more primordial role in B cell development.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypoxia and Oxygen-Sensing Signaling in Gene Regulation and Cancer Progression
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Hypoxia and Oxygen-Sensing Signaling in Gene Regulation and Cancer Progression Guang Yang, Rachel Shi and Qing Zhang * Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; [email protected] (G.Y.); [email protected] (R.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-214-645-4671 Received: 6 October 2020; Accepted: 29 October 2020; Published: 31 October 2020 Abstract: Oxygen homeostasis regulation is the most fundamental cellular process for adjusting physiological oxygen variations, and its irregularity leads to various human diseases, including cancer. Hypoxia is closely associated with cancer development, and hypoxia/oxygen-sensing signaling plays critical roles in the modulation of cancer progression. The key molecules of the hypoxia/oxygen-sensing signaling include the transcriptional regulator hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) which widely controls oxygen responsive genes, the central members of the 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG)-dependent dioxygenases, such as prolyl hydroxylase (PHD or EglN), and an E3 ubiquitin ligase component for HIF degeneration called von Hippel–Lindau (encoding protein pVHL). In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the canonical hypoxia signaling, HIF transcription factors, and pVHL. In addition, the role of 2-OG-dependent enzymes, such as DNA/RNA-modifying enzymes, JmjC domain-containing enzymes, and prolyl hydroxylases, in gene regulation of cancer progression, is specifically reviewed. We also discuss the therapeutic advancement of targeting hypoxia and oxygen sensing pathways in cancer. Keywords: hypoxia; PHDs; TETs; JmjCs; HIFs 1. Introduction Molecular oxygen serves as a co-factor in many biochemical processes and is fundamental for aerobic organisms to maintain intracellular ATP levels [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 T + is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology , 34 of which you can access for free at: 2016; 197:1477-1488; Prepublished online 1 July from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication 2016; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600589 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/197/4/1477 Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8 Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model Katherine A. Waugh, Sonia M. Leach, Brandon L. Moore, Tullia C. Bruno, Jonathan D. Buhrman and Jill E. Slansky J Immunol cites 95 articles Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2016/07/01/jimmunol.160058 9.DCSupplemental This article http://www.jimmunol.org/content/197/4/1477.full#ref-list-1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material References Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2016 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 25, 2021. The Journal of Immunology Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model Katherine A.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaporin Channels in the Heart—Physiology and Pathophysiology
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Aquaporin Channels in the Heart—Physiology and Pathophysiology Arie O. Verkerk 1,2,* , Elisabeth M. Lodder 2 and Ronald Wilders 1 1 Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2 Department of Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-20-5664670 Received: 29 March 2019; Accepted: 23 April 2019; Published: 25 April 2019 Abstract: Mammalian aquaporins (AQPs) are transmembrane channels expressed in a large variety of cells and tissues throughout the body. They are known as water channels, but they also facilitate the transport of small solutes, gasses, and monovalent cations. To date, 13 different AQPs, encoded by the genes AQP0–AQP12, have been identified in mammals, which regulate various important biological functions in kidney, brain, lung, digestive system, eye, and skin. Consequently, dysfunction of AQPs is involved in a wide variety of disorders. AQPs are also present in the heart, even with a specific distribution pattern in cardiomyocytes, but whether their presence is essential for proper (electro)physiological cardiac function has not intensively been studied. This review summarizes recent findings and highlights the involvement of AQPs in normal and pathological cardiac function. We conclude that AQPs are at least implicated in proper cardiac water homeostasis and energy balance as well as heart failure and arsenic cardiotoxicity. However, this review also demonstrates that many effects of cardiac AQPs, especially on excitation-contraction coupling processes, are virtually unexplored.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Interaction Network of Alternatively Spliced Isoforms from Brain Links Genetic Risk Factors for Autism
    ARTICLE Received 24 Aug 2013 | Accepted 14 Mar 2014 | Published 11 Apr 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4650 OPEN Protein interaction network of alternatively spliced isoforms from brain links genetic risk factors for autism Roser Corominas1,*, Xinping Yang2,3,*, Guan Ning Lin1,*, Shuli Kang1,*, Yun Shen2,3, Lila Ghamsari2,3,w, Martin Broly2,3, Maria Rodriguez2,3, Stanley Tam2,3, Shelly A. Trigg2,3,w, Changyu Fan2,3, Song Yi2,3, Murat Tasan4, Irma Lemmens5, Xingyan Kuang6, Nan Zhao6, Dheeraj Malhotra7, Jacob J. Michaelson7,w, Vladimir Vacic8, Michael A. Calderwood2,3, Frederick P. Roth2,3,4, Jan Tavernier5, Steve Horvath9, Kourosh Salehi-Ashtiani2,3,w, Dmitry Korkin6, Jonathan Sebat7, David E. Hill2,3, Tong Hao2,3, Marc Vidal2,3 & Lilia M. Iakoucheva1 Increased risk for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is attributed to hundreds of genetic loci. The convergence of ASD variants have been investigated using various approaches, including protein interactions extracted from the published literature. However, these datasets are frequently incomplete, carry biases and are limited to interactions of a single splicing isoform, which may not be expressed in the disease-relevant tissue. Here we introduce a new interactome mapping approach by experimentally identifying interactions between brain-expressed alternatively spliced variants of ASD risk factors. The Autism Spliceform Interaction Network reveals that almost half of the detected interactions and about 30% of the newly identified interacting partners represent contribution from splicing variants, emphasizing the importance of isoform networks. Isoform interactions greatly contribute to establishing direct physical connections between proteins from the de novo autism CNVs. Our findings demonstrate the critical role of spliceform networks for translating genetic knowledge into a better understanding of human diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • ` Probing the Epigenome Andrea Huston1, Cheryl H Arrowsmith1,2
    ` Probing the Epigenome Andrea Huston1, Cheryl H Arrowsmith1,2, Stefan Knapp3,4,*, Matthieu Schapira1,5,* 1. Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada 2. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada 3. Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Target Discovery Institute, and Structural Genomic Consortium, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom 4. Institute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 5. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected], [email protected] Epigenetic chemical probes are having a strong impact on biological discovery and target validation. Systematic coverage of emerging epigenetic target classes with these potent, selective, cell-active chemical tools will profoundly influence our understanding of the human biology and pathology of chromatin-templated mechanisms. ` Chemical probes are research-enablers Advances in genomics and proteomics methodologies in recent years have made it possible to associate thousands of genes and proteins with specific diseases, biological processes, molecular networks and pathways. However, data from these large scale initiatives alone has not translated widely into new studies on these disease-associated proteins, and the biomedical research community still tends to focus on proteins that were already known before the sequencing of the human genome1. The human kinome for instance, a target class of direct relevance to cancer and other disease areas, is a telling example: based on the number of research articles indexed in pubmed in 2011, 75% of the research activity focused on only 10% of the 518 human kinases – largely the same kinases that were the focus of research before sequencing of the human genome - while 60% of the kinome, some 300 enzymes, was virtually ignored by the community2.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Significant
    Table 2. Significant (Q < 0.05 and |d | > 0.5) transcripts from the meta-analysis Gene Chr Mb Gene Name Affy ProbeSet cDNA_IDs d HAP/LAP d HAP/LAP d d IS Average d Ztest P values Q-value Symbol ID (study #5) 1 2 STS B2m 2 122 beta-2 microglobulin 1452428_a_at AI848245 1.75334941 4 3.2 4 3.2316485 1.07398E-09 5.69E-08 Man2b1 8 84.4 mannosidase 2, alpha B1 1416340_a_at H4049B01 3.75722111 3.87309653 2.1 1.6 2.84852656 5.32443E-07 1.58E-05 1110032A03Rik 9 50.9 RIKEN cDNA 1110032A03 gene 1417211_a_at H4035E05 4 1.66015788 4 1.7 2.82772795 2.94266E-05 0.000527 NA 9 48.5 --- 1456111_at 3.43701477 1.85785922 4 2 2.8237185 9.97969E-08 3.48E-06 Scn4b 9 45.3 Sodium channel, type IV, beta 1434008_at AI844796 3.79536664 1.63774235 3.3 2.3 2.75319499 1.48057E-08 6.21E-07 polypeptide Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RIKEN cDNA 2310040G17 gene 1417619_at 4 3.38875643 1.4 2 2.69163229 8.84279E-06 0.0001904 BC056474 15 12.1 Mus musculus cDNA clone 1424117_at H3030A06 3.95752801 2.42838452 1.9 2.2 2.62132809 1.3344E-08 5.66E-07 MGC:67360 IMAGE:6823629, complete cds NA 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1454696_at -3.46081884 -4 -1.3 -1.6 -2.6026947 8.58458E-05 0.0012617 beta 1 Gnb1 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1417432_a_at H3094D02 -3.13334396 -4 -1.6 -1.7 -2.5946297 1.04542E-05 0.0002202 beta 1 Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RAD23a homolog (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Seq2pathway Vignette
    seq2pathway Vignette Bin Wang, Xinan Holly Yang, Arjun Kinstlick May 19, 2021 Contents 1 Abstract 1 2 Package Installation 2 3 runseq2pathway 2 4 Two main functions 3 4.1 seq2gene . .3 4.1.1 seq2gene flowchart . .3 4.1.2 runseq2gene inputs/parameters . .5 4.1.3 runseq2gene outputs . .8 4.2 gene2pathway . 10 4.2.1 gene2pathway flowchart . 11 4.2.2 gene2pathway test inputs/parameters . 11 4.2.3 gene2pathway test outputs . 12 5 Examples 13 5.1 ChIP-seq data analysis . 13 5.1.1 Map ChIP-seq enriched peaks to genes using runseq2gene .................... 13 5.1.2 Discover enriched GO terms using gene2pathway_test with gene scores . 15 5.1.3 Discover enriched GO terms using Fisher's Exact test without gene scores . 17 5.1.4 Add description for genes . 20 5.2 RNA-seq data analysis . 20 6 R environment session 23 1 Abstract Seq2pathway is a novel computational tool to analyze functional gene-sets (including signaling pathways) using variable next-generation sequencing data[1]. Integral to this tool are the \seq2gene" and \gene2pathway" components in series that infer a quantitative pathway-level profile for each sample. The seq2gene function assigns phenotype-associated significance of genomic regions to gene-level scores, where the significance could be p-values of SNPs or point mutations, protein-binding affinity, or transcriptional expression level. The seq2gene function has the feasibility to assign non-exon regions to a range of neighboring genes besides the nearest one, thus facilitating the study of functional non-coding elements[2]. Then the gene2pathway summarizes gene-level measurements to pathway-level scores, comparing the quantity of significance for gene members within a pathway with those outside a pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutant IDH, (R)-2-Hydroxyglutarate, and Cancer
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW What a difference a hydroxyl makes: mutant IDH, (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate, and cancer Julie-Aurore Losman1 and William G. Kaelin Jr.1,2,3 1Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA; 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, USA Mutations in metabolic enzymes, including isocitrate whether altered cellular metabolism is a cause of cancer dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2, in cancer strongly or merely an adaptive response of cancer cells in the face implicate altered metabolism in tumorigenesis. IDH1 of accelerated cell proliferation is still a topic of some and IDH2 catalyze the interconversion of isocitrate and debate. 2-oxoglutarate (2OG). 2OG is a TCA cycle intermediate The recent identification of cancer-associated muta- and an essential cofactor for many enzymes, including tions in three metabolic enzymes suggests that altered JmjC domain-containing histone demethylases, TET cellular metabolism can indeed be a cause of some 5-methylcytosine hydroxylases, and EglN prolyl-4-hydrox- cancers (Pollard et al. 2003; King et al. 2006; Raimundo ylases. Cancer-associated IDH mutations alter the enzymes et al. 2011). Two of these enzymes, fumarate hydratase such that they reduce 2OG to the structurally similar (FH) and succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), are bone fide metabolite (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate [(R)-2HG]. Here we tumor suppressors, and loss-of-function mutations in FH review what is known about the molecular mechanisms and SDH have been identified in various cancers, in- of transformation by mutant IDH and discuss their im- cluding renal cell carcinomas and paragangliomas.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Functional Interactions During Biogenesis of Epithelial Junctions
    ARTICLE Received 11 Dec 2015 | Accepted 13 Oct 2016 | Published 6 Dec 2016 | Updated 5 Jan 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13542 OPEN Defining functional interactions during biogenesis of epithelial junctions J.C. Erasmus1,*, S. Bruche1,*,w, L. Pizarro1,2,*, N. Maimari1,3,*, T. Poggioli1,w, C. Tomlinson4,J.Lees5, I. Zalivina1,w, A. Wheeler1,w, A. Alberts6, A. Russo2 & V.M.M. Braga1 In spite of extensive recent progress, a comprehensive understanding of how actin cytoskeleton remodelling supports stable junctions remains to be established. Here we design a platform that integrates actin functions with optimized phenotypic clustering and identify new cytoskeletal proteins, their functional hierarchy and pathways that modulate E-cadherin adhesion. Depletion of EEF1A, an actin bundling protein, increases E-cadherin levels at junctions without a corresponding reinforcement of cell–cell contacts. This unexpected result reflects a more dynamic and mobile junctional actin in EEF1A-depleted cells. A partner for EEF1A in cadherin contact maintenance is the formin DIAPH2, which interacts with EEF1A. In contrast, depletion of either the endocytic regulator TRIP10 or the Rho GTPase activator VAV2 reduces E-cadherin levels at junctions. TRIP10 binds to and requires VAV2 function for its junctional localization. Overall, we present new conceptual insights on junction stabilization, which integrate known and novel pathways with impact for epithelial morphogenesis, homeostasis and diseases. 1 National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 2 Computing Department, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 3 Bioengineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 4 Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Identities in Evs Isolated from U87-MG GBM Cells As Determined by NG LC-MS/MS
    Protein identities in EVs isolated from U87-MG GBM cells as determined by NG LC-MS/MS. No. Accession Description Σ Coverage Σ# Proteins Σ# Unique Peptides Σ# Peptides Σ# PSMs # AAs MW [kDa] calc. pI 1 A8MS94 Putative golgin subfamily A member 2-like protein 5 OS=Homo sapiens PE=5 SV=2 - [GG2L5_HUMAN] 100 1 1 7 88 110 12,03704523 5,681152344 2 P60660 Myosin light polypeptide 6 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MYL6 PE=1 SV=2 - [MYL6_HUMAN] 100 3 5 17 173 151 16,91913397 4,652832031 3 Q6ZYL4 General transcription factor IIH subunit 5 OS=Homo sapiens GN=GTF2H5 PE=1 SV=1 - [TF2H5_HUMAN] 98,59 1 1 4 13 71 8,048185945 4,652832031 4 P60709 Actin, cytoplasmic 1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=ACTB PE=1 SV=1 - [ACTB_HUMAN] 97,6 5 5 35 917 375 41,70973209 5,478027344 5 P13489 Ribonuclease inhibitor OS=Homo sapiens GN=RNH1 PE=1 SV=2 - [RINI_HUMAN] 96,75 1 12 37 173 461 49,94108966 4,817871094 6 P09382 Galectin-1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=LGALS1 PE=1 SV=2 - [LEG1_HUMAN] 96,3 1 7 14 283 135 14,70620005 5,503417969 7 P60174 Triosephosphate isomerase OS=Homo sapiens GN=TPI1 PE=1 SV=3 - [TPIS_HUMAN] 95,1 3 16 25 375 286 30,77169764 5,922363281 8 P04406 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase OS=Homo sapiens GN=GAPDH PE=1 SV=3 - [G3P_HUMAN] 94,63 2 13 31 509 335 36,03039959 8,455566406 9 Q15185 Prostaglandin E synthase 3 OS=Homo sapiens GN=PTGES3 PE=1 SV=1 - [TEBP_HUMAN] 93,13 1 5 12 74 160 18,68541938 4,538574219 10 P09417 Dihydropteridine reductase OS=Homo sapiens GN=QDPR PE=1 SV=2 - [DHPR_HUMAN] 93,03 1 1 17 69 244 25,77302971 7,371582031 11 P01911 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen,
    [Show full text]