Expression and Purification of Aquaporin6

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Expression and Purification of Aquaporin6 Expression and Purification of Aquaporin-6 in Different Systems Comparison of cell-free, Semliki Forest virus, and Pichia pastoris expression systems Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Basel von André Krüger aus Hattingen, Deutschland Basel, 2012 Genehmigt von der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät auf Antrag von Prof. Dr. Andreas Engel und Prof. Dr. Henning Stahlberg Basel, den 26.06.2012 Prof. Dr. Martin Spiess Dekan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Biological memBranes: composition and function ........................................ 1 1.2 ‘Transport’ of water across biological memBranes ....................................... 1 1.1.1 Types and functions of human AQPs ........................................................................ 2 1.1.2 Aquaporin-6 ......................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Heterologous expression of Aquaporins ........................................................ 18 1.2.1 Cell-free membrane protein expression .............................................................. 21 1.2.2 The Semliki Forest Virus expression system ...................................................... 26 1.2.3 The Pichia pastoris expression system ................................................................. 30 1.3 Aim of this work ..................................................................................................... 32 2 Methods ................................................................................................................ 35 2.1 Cell-free protein expression ............................................................................... 35 2.1.1 DNA template design .................................................................................................... 35 2.1.2 Transcription and translation ................................................................................... 35 2.1.2.1 Preparation of T7 RNA polymerase for cell-free expression .................................. 35 2.1.2.2 Preparation of E. coli S30 extract ........................................................................................ 36 2.1.2.3 Analytical and preparative scale cell-free expression ............................................... 37 2.1.2.4 Liposome preparation ............................................................................................................. 39 2.1.3 Purification ........................................................................................................................ 40 2.2 Protein expression with the Semliki Forest virus system ........................ 41 2.2.1 DNA template design .................................................................................................... 41 2.2.2 Transcription and translation ................................................................................... 41 2.2.2.1 In vitro transcription ................................................................................................................ 41 2.2.2.2 Transfection of mammalian cells ........................................................................................ 42 2.2.2.3 Harvesting and activation of recombinant virus ......................................................... 42 2.2.2.4 Titer determination .................................................................................................................. 43 2.2.2.5 Infection of mammalian cells and protein expression .............................................. 43 2.2.3 Purification ........................................................................................................................ 43 2.2.3.1 Membrane preparation and solubilization .................................................................... 43 2.2.3.2 Ni-NTA purification (IMAC) .................................................................................................. 44 2.2.3.3 Reconstitution ............................................................................................................................. 45 2.2.4 General cell culture methods .................................................................................... 45 2.3 Protein expression with Pichia pastoris ......................................................... 47 2.3.1 DNA template design .................................................................................................... 47 2.3.2 Transcription and translation ................................................................................... 48 2.3.3 Purification ........................................................................................................................ 48 2.4 Protein analysis ...................................................................................................... 50 2.4.1 Determination of protein concentration .............................................................. 50 2.4.2 SDS-PAGE ........................................................................................................................... 50 2.4.3 Western blot analysis ................................................................................................... 50 2.4.4 Size exclusion chromatography ............................................................................... 50 I EXPRESSION OF AQUAPORIN-6 IN DIFFERENT SYSTEMS 2.4.5 Single particle negative stain transmission electron microscopy ............ 51 2.5 Protein reconstitution into liposomes ............................................................ 52 2.6 Freeze fracture electron microscopy ............................................................... 54 2.6.1 Sample preparation ....................................................................................................... 54 2.6.2 Sample analysis ............................................................................................................... 54 2.7 Water conductance measurements of proteoliposomes ........................... 55 3 Results & Discussion ......................................................................................... 57 3.1 Cell-free expression of AQP6 .............................................................................. 57 3.1.1 Template design ............................................................................................................. 57 3.1.2 Transcription and translation .................................................................................. 58 3.1.2.1 Basic protocol ............................................................................................................................. 58 3.1.2.2 Buffer conditions ....................................................................................................................... 59 3.1.2.3 Optimizing parameters for expression ............................................................................ 59 3.1.2.4 Altering N-terminal tags to optimize transcription and translation ................... 61 3.1.2.5 Evaluation of detergents for expression and solubilization ................................... 62 3.1.3 Purification ....................................................................................................................... 65 3.1.4 Single particle analysis ................................................................................................ 69 3.1.5 Reconstitution into liposomes .................................................................................. 69 3.1.5 Co-translational reconstitution ................................................................................ 73 3.1.6 Water conductance of cell-free expressed AQP6 ............................................. 77 3.2 Semliki Forest virus expression of AQP6 ........................................................ 80 3.2.1 Template design ............................................................................................................. 80 3.2.2 Transcription ........................................................................................................................ 80 3.2.2.1 In vitro transcription .................................................................................................................. 80 3.2.2.2 Virus production ........................................................................................................................ 82 3.2.2 Translation ........................................................................................................................ 82 3.2.3 Solubilization ................................................................................................................... 84 3.2.4 Purification ....................................................................................................................... 85 3.2.5 Single particle analysis ................................................................................................ 89 3.2.6 Reconstitution into liposomes .................................................................................. 90 3.2.7 Water conductance of heterogously expressed AQP6 ................................... 93 3.3 Pichia pastoris expression of AQP6 .................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Aquaporin Channels in the Heart—Physiology and Pathophysiology
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Aquaporin Channels in the Heart—Physiology and Pathophysiology Arie O. Verkerk 1,2,* , Elisabeth M. Lodder 2 and Ronald Wilders 1 1 Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2 Department of Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-20-5664670 Received: 29 March 2019; Accepted: 23 April 2019; Published: 25 April 2019 Abstract: Mammalian aquaporins (AQPs) are transmembrane channels expressed in a large variety of cells and tissues throughout the body. They are known as water channels, but they also facilitate the transport of small solutes, gasses, and monovalent cations. To date, 13 different AQPs, encoded by the genes AQP0–AQP12, have been identified in mammals, which regulate various important biological functions in kidney, brain, lung, digestive system, eye, and skin. Consequently, dysfunction of AQPs is involved in a wide variety of disorders. AQPs are also present in the heart, even with a specific distribution pattern in cardiomyocytes, but whether their presence is essential for proper (electro)physiological cardiac function has not intensively been studied. This review summarizes recent findings and highlights the involvement of AQPs in normal and pathological cardiac function. We conclude that AQPs are at least implicated in proper cardiac water homeostasis and energy balance as well as heart failure and arsenic cardiotoxicity. However, this review also demonstrates that many effects of cardiac AQPs, especially on excitation-contraction coupling processes, are virtually unexplored.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Significant
    Table 2. Significant (Q < 0.05 and |d | > 0.5) transcripts from the meta-analysis Gene Chr Mb Gene Name Affy ProbeSet cDNA_IDs d HAP/LAP d HAP/LAP d d IS Average d Ztest P values Q-value Symbol ID (study #5) 1 2 STS B2m 2 122 beta-2 microglobulin 1452428_a_at AI848245 1.75334941 4 3.2 4 3.2316485 1.07398E-09 5.69E-08 Man2b1 8 84.4 mannosidase 2, alpha B1 1416340_a_at H4049B01 3.75722111 3.87309653 2.1 1.6 2.84852656 5.32443E-07 1.58E-05 1110032A03Rik 9 50.9 RIKEN cDNA 1110032A03 gene 1417211_a_at H4035E05 4 1.66015788 4 1.7 2.82772795 2.94266E-05 0.000527 NA 9 48.5 --- 1456111_at 3.43701477 1.85785922 4 2 2.8237185 9.97969E-08 3.48E-06 Scn4b 9 45.3 Sodium channel, type IV, beta 1434008_at AI844796 3.79536664 1.63774235 3.3 2.3 2.75319499 1.48057E-08 6.21E-07 polypeptide Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RIKEN cDNA 2310040G17 gene 1417619_at 4 3.38875643 1.4 2 2.69163229 8.84279E-06 0.0001904 BC056474 15 12.1 Mus musculus cDNA clone 1424117_at H3030A06 3.95752801 2.42838452 1.9 2.2 2.62132809 1.3344E-08 5.66E-07 MGC:67360 IMAGE:6823629, complete cds NA 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1454696_at -3.46081884 -4 -1.3 -1.6 -2.6026947 8.58458E-05 0.0012617 beta 1 Gnb1 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1417432_a_at H3094D02 -3.13334396 -4 -1.6 -1.7 -2.5946297 1.04542E-05 0.0002202 beta 1 Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RAD23a homolog (S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Ion Channels 3 1
    r r r Cell Signalling Biology Michael J. Berridge Module 3 Ion Channels 3 1 Module 3 Ion Channels Synopsis Ion channels have two main signalling functions: either they can generate second messengers or they can function as effectors by responding to such messengers. Their role in signal generation is mainly centred on the Ca2 + signalling pathway, which has a large number of Ca2+ entry channels and internal Ca2+ release channels, both of which contribute to the generation of Ca2 + signals. Ion channels are also important effectors in that they mediate the action of different intracellular signalling pathways. There are a large number of K+ channels and many of these function in different + aspects of cell signalling. The voltage-dependent K (KV) channels regulate membrane potential and + excitability. The inward rectifier K (Kir) channel family has a number of important groups of channels + + such as the G protein-gated inward rectifier K (GIRK) channels and the ATP-sensitive K (KATP) + + channels. The two-pore domain K (K2P) channels are responsible for the large background K current. Some of the actions of Ca2 + are carried out by Ca2+-sensitive K+ channels and Ca2+-sensitive Cl − channels. The latter are members of a large group of chloride channels and transporters with multiple functions. There is a large family of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters some of which have a signalling role in that they extrude signalling components from the cell. One of the ABC transporters is the cystic − − fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) that conducts anions (Cl and HCO3 )and contributes to the osmotic gradient for the parallel flow of water in various transporting epithelia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ion Channels
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Ion channels. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1442g5hg Journal British journal of pharmacology, 176 Suppl 1(S1) ISSN 0007-1188 Authors Alexander, Stephen PH Mathie, Alistair Peters, John A et al. Publication Date 2019-12-01 DOI 10.1111/bph.14749 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Ion channels. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S142–S228 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Ion channels Stephen PH Alexander1 , Alistair Mathie2 ,JohnAPeters3 , Emma L Veale2 , Jörg Striessnig4 , Eamonn Kelly5, Jane F Armstrong6 , Elena Faccenda6 ,SimonDHarding6 ,AdamJPawson6 , Joanna L Sharman6 , Christopher Southan6 , Jamie A Davies6 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK 2Medway School of Pharmacy, The Universities of Greenwich and Kent at Medway, Anson Building, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK 3Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK 4Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria 5School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK 6Centre for Discovery Brain Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 is the fourth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties.
    [Show full text]
  • AQP3 and AQP5—Potential Regulators of Redox Status in Breast Cancer
    molecules Review AQP3 and AQP5—Potential Regulators of Redox Status in Breast Cancer Lidija Milkovi´c and Ana Cipakˇ Gašparovi´c* Division of Molecular Medicine, Ruder¯ Boškovi´cInstitute, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +385-1-457-1212 Abstract: Breast cancer is still one of the leading causes of mortality in the female population. Despite the campaigns for early detection, the improvement in procedures and treatment, drastic improvement in survival rate is omitted. Discovery of aquaporins, at first described as cellular plumbing system, opened new insights in processes which contribute to cancer cell motility and proliferation. As we discover new pathways activated by aquaporins, the more we realize the complexity of biological processes and the necessity to fully understand the pathways affected by specific aquaporin in order to gain the desired outcome–remission of the disease. Among the 13 human aquaporins, AQP3 and AQP5 were shown to be significantly upregulated in breast cancer indicating their role in the development of this malignancy. Therefore, these two aquaporins will be discussed for their involvement in breast cancer development, regulation of oxidative stress and redox signalling pathways leading to possibly targeting them for new therapies. Keywords: AQP3; AQP5; oxidative stress Citation: Milkovi´c,L.; Cipakˇ 1. Introduction Gašparovi´c,A. AQP3 and Despite the progress in research and treatment procedures, cancer still remains the AQP5—Potential Regulators of Redox leading cause of death. Today, cancer is targeted via different approaches which is deter- Status in Breast Cancer. Molecules mined by diagnosis, tumour marker expression, and specific mutations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pflugers Final
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Serveur académique lausannois A comprehensive analysis of gene expression profiles in distal parts of the mouse renal tubule. Sylvain Pradervand2, Annie Mercier Zuber1, Gabriel Centeno1, Olivier Bonny1,3,4 and Dmitri Firsov1,4 1 - Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Lausanne, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland 2 - DNA Array Facility, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 3 - Service of Nephrology, Lausanne University Hospital, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland 4 – these two authors have equally contributed to the study to whom correspondence should be addressed: Dmitri FIRSOV Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Lausanne, 27 rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland Phone: ++ 41-216925406 Fax: ++ 41-216925355 e-mail: [email protected] and Olivier BONNY Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Lausanne, 27 rue du Bugnon, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland Phone: ++ 41-216925417 Fax: ++ 41-216925355 e-mail: [email protected] 1 Abstract The distal parts of the renal tubule play a critical role in maintaining homeostasis of extracellular fluids. In this review, we present an in-depth analysis of microarray-based gene expression profiles available for microdissected mouse distal nephron segments, i.e., the distal convoluted tubule (DCT) and the connecting tubule (CNT), and for the cortical portion of the collecting duct (CCD) (Zuber et al., 2009). Classification of expressed transcripts in 14 major functional gene categories demonstrated that all principal proteins involved in maintaining of salt and water balance are represented by highly abundant transcripts. However, a significant number of transcripts belonging, for instance, to categories of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) or serine-threonine kinases exhibit high expression levels but remain unassigned to a specific renal function.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Enrichments of Disease Variants Indicate Hundreds of Independent Loci Across Eight Diseases
    Functional enrichments of disease variants indicate hundreds of independent loci across eight diseases Abhishek K. Sarkar, Lucas D. Ward, & Manolis Kellis 1.00 0.75 Cohort correlation !"SS 0.50 #AN"$" %&!" N"!"C1 N"!"C2 Pearson 0.25 'verall )TC## 0.00 Hold-out -0.25 0 25000 50000 75000 100000 Top n SNPs (full meta-analysis) Supplementary Figure 1: Correlation between individual cohort 푧-scores and meta-analyzed 푧- scores of the remainder in a study of rheumatoid arthritis considering increasing number of SNPs. SNPs are ranked by 푝-value in the overall meta-analysis. Overall correlation is between sample-size weighted 푧-scores and published inverse-variance weighted 푧-scores. 1 15-state model, 5 marks, 127 epigenomes Cell type/ tissue group Epigenome name Addtl marks H3K4me1 H3K4me3 H3K36me3 H3K27me3 H3K9me3 H3K27ac H3K9ac DNase-Seq DNA methyl RNA-Seq EID states Chrom. E017 IMR90 fetal lung fibroblasts Cell Line 21 IMR90 E002 ES-WA7 Cell Line E008 H9 Cell Line 21 E001 ES-I3 Cell Line E015 HUES6 Cell Line ESC E014 HUES48 Cell Line E016 HUES64 Cell Line E003 H1 Cell Line 20 E024 ES-UCSF4 Cell Line E020 iPS-20b Cell Line E019 iPS-18 Cell Line iPSC E018 iPS-15b Cell Line E021 iPS DF 6.9 Cell Line E022 iPS DF 19.11 Cell Line E007 H1 Derived Neuronal Progenitor Cultured Cells 13 E009 H9 Derived Neuronal Progenitor Cultured Cells 1 E010 H9 Derived Neuron Cultured Cells 1 E013 hESC Derived CD56+ Mesoderm Cultured Cells ES-deriv E012 hESC Derived CD56+ Ectoderm Cultured Cells E011 hESC Derived CD184+ Endoderm Cultured Cells E004 H1 BMP4 Derived Mesendoderm Cultured Cells 11 E005 H1 BMP4 Derived Trophoblast Cultured Cells 15 E006 H1 Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells 13 E062 Primary mononuclear cells from peripheral blood E034 Primary T cells from peripheral blood E045 Prim.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Water Homeostasis: Diverse Functional Roles of Mammalian Aquaporins Philip Kitchena, Rebecca E. Dayb, Mootaz M. Salmanb
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Aston Publications Explorer © 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Beyond water homeostasis: Diverse functional roles of mammalian aquaporins Philip Kitchena, Rebecca E. Dayb, Mootaz M. Salmanb, Matthew T. Connerb, Roslyn M. Billc and Alex C. Connerd* aMolecular Organisation and Assembly in Cells Doctoral Training Centre, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK bBiomedical Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK cSchool of Life & Health Sciences and Aston Research Centre for Healthy Ageing, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK dInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK * To whom correspondence should be addressed: Alex C. Conner, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. 0044 121 415 8809 ([email protected]) Keywords: aquaporin, solute transport, ion transport, membrane trafficking, cell volume regulation The abbreviations used are: GLP, glyceroporin; MD, molecular dynamics; SC, stratum corneum; ANP, atrial natriuretic peptide; NSCC, non-selective cation channel; RVD/RVI, regulatory volume decrease/increase; TM, transmembrane; ROS, reactive oxygen species 1 Abstract BACKGROUND: Aquaporin (AQP) water channels are best known as passive transporters of water that are vital for water homeostasis. SCOPE OF REVIEW: AQP knockout studies in whole animals and cultured cells, along with naturally occurring human mutations suggest that the transport of neutral solutes through AQPs has important physiological roles. Emerging biophysical evidence suggests that AQPs may also facilitate gas (CO2) and cation transport.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1 2 3 Cell Type-Specific Transcriptomics of Hypothalamic
    1 2 3 4 Cell type-specific transcriptomics of hypothalamic energy-sensing neuron responses to 5 weight-loss 6 7 Fredrick E. Henry1,†, Ken Sugino1,†, Adam Tozer2, Tiago Branco2, Scott M. Sternson1,* 8 9 1Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 10 20147, USA. 11 2Division of Neurobiology, Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, 12 Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK 13 14 †Co-first author 15 *Correspondence to: [email protected] 16 Phone: 571-209-4103 17 18 Authors have no competing interests 19 1 20 Abstract 21 Molecular and cellular processes in neurons are critical for sensing and responding to energy 22 deficit states, such as during weight-loss. AGRP neurons are a key hypothalamic population 23 that is activated during energy deficit and increases appetite and weight-gain. Cell type-specific 24 transcriptomics can be used to identify pathways that counteract weight-loss, and here we 25 report high-quality gene expression profiles of AGRP neurons from well-fed and food-deprived 26 young adult mice. For comparison, we also analyzed POMC neurons, an intermingled 27 population that suppresses appetite and body weight. We find that AGRP neurons are 28 considerably more sensitive to energy deficit than POMC neurons. Furthermore, we identify cell 29 type-specific pathways involving endoplasmic reticulum-stress, circadian signaling, ion 30 channels, neuropeptides, and receptors. Combined with methods to validate and manipulate 31 these pathways, this resource greatly expands molecular insight into neuronal regulation of 32 body weight, and may be useful for devising therapeutic strategies for obesity and eating 33 disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relevance of Aquaporins for the Physiology, Pathology, and Aging of the Female Reproductive System in Mammals
    cells Review The Relevance of Aquaporins for the Physiology, Pathology, and Aging of the Female Reproductive System in Mammals Paweł Kordowitzki 1,2 , Wiesława Kranc 3, Rut Bryl 3, Bartosz Kempisty 3,4,5, Agnieszka Skowronska 6 and Mariusz T. Skowronski 1,* 1 Department of Basic and Preclinical Sciences, Institute for Veterinary Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland; [email protected] 2 Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of Polish Academy of Sciences, 10-243 Olsztyn, Poland 3 Department of Anatomy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland; [email protected] (W.K.); [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (B.K.) 4 Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland 5 Department of Veterinary Surgery, Institute for Veterinary Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland 6 Department of Human Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Warszawska Street 30, 10-082 Olsztyn, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-56-611-2231 Received: 27 October 2020; Accepted: 29 November 2020; Published: 1 December 2020 Abstract: Aquaporins constitute a group of water channel proteins located in numerous cell types. These are pore-forming transmembrane proteins, which mediate the specific passage of water molecules through membranes. It is well-known that water homeostasis plays a crucial role in different reproductive processes, e.g., oocyte transport, hormonal secretion, completion of successful fertilization, blastocyst formation, pregnancy, and birth. Further, aquaporins are involved in the process of spermatogenesis, and they have been reported to be involved during the storage of spermatozoa.
    [Show full text]