DOCSLIB.ORG

Equality in Accession Process, ILGA-Europe, 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Equality in Accession Process, ILGA-Europe, 2001 This report is published by: ILGA - EUROPE the European Region of the International Lesbian and Gay Association Tervurenlaan 94/1 B-1040 Brussels [email protected] www.ilga-europe.org ILGA-Europe enjoys consultative status with the Council of Europe and is member of the Platform for Social NGOs Project co-ordinators: Tatjana Greif (Ljubljana) and Adrian Coman (Bucharest) Design: Lucian David [[email protected]] The report is available at ILGA Europe’s website. Organisations in the accession countries are encouraged to create links from their web pages. © Authors/ILGA-Europe, Brussels, March 2001 ISBN 973-0-02296-8 Readers are encouraged to copy and disseminate this document widely, provided that appropriate reference is made to the source Printed in Romania by Arta Graficã Bucharest Printing commissioned by ACCEPT (Bucharest Acceptance Group) ILGA-Europe The International Lesbian and Gay Association activities is available at ILGA-Europe’s web-site (ILGA) was founded in 1978 and is a world-wide www.ilga-europe.org. federation of more than 300 groups and organisations in more than 70 countries on all continents fighting ILGA has also given impetus and support to gay for equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and and lesbian groups in, for example, Latin America transgendered people. In December 1996, ILGA- and South Africa, and not least played an important Europe became the first regional association of ILGA role in the emergence and development of the first to be formally established. gay and lesbian organisations in the former “East- Bloc”. ILGA’s support for activists and groups in During its 23 years of existence, ILGA has called these countries dates back to 1982 when its Vienna- for and carried out numerous campaigns for law based member Homosexuelle Initiative (HOSI) Wien reform in many countries and against individual started the Eastern Europe Information Pool (EEIP) cases of discrimination, highlighting many cases of on behalf of ILGA. It reached out to activists in human rights abuses against lesbians and gays. these countries, facilitated information exchange, supported activities such as the production and cir- Major successes of ILGA’s lobbying on the inter- culation of gay samisdat newsletters in Polish, and national level include the deletion of “homosexu- put together annual activity and news reports. It ality” from the World Health Organization’s Inter- published a first book on the situation of lesbians national Classification of Diseases, and the deci- and gays in Eastern Europe2 and helped organise sion of Amnesty International to adopt persons im- the first ILGA sub-regional conferences for East- prisoned solely on the grounds of their sexual ori- ern and Southern Europe which took place even entation as prisoners of conscience. before the lifting of Iron Curtain and the fall of the Berlin Wall. The first was organised in Budapest in ILGA has undertaken sustained lobbying of many 1987, and nine more were to follow: Warsaw 1988, international organisations, such as the United Na- Budapest 1989, Leipzig 1990, Prague 1991, tions, the Organization for Security and Co-opera- Bratislava 1992, Vienna 1993, Palanga/Lithuania tion in Europe (OSCE) and, in particular, the Coun- 1994, Kiev 1995, and Ljubljana 1996. cil of Europe and the European Union. In the last four years, ILGA-Europe has intensified its lobby- ILGA’s first regional conference for Europe ever ing activities with the two latter organisations in held in a former “East-Bloc” country was organised Strasbourg and Brussels. The inclusion of “sexual by its Latvian member LASV in Riga in 1995. orientation” in Article 13 TEC and in the non-dis- ILGA-Europe’s annual conference in 2000 was crimination clause of the EU Charter of Fundamen- hosted by ACCEPT in Bucharest. tal Rights were two of many positive results to which ILGA Europe contributed at EU level. ILGA- In all these years, ILGA and ILGA-Europe have tried Europe has also worked for the adoption of the first to support the lesbian and gay movement in these measures based on this Article 13.1 It has also car- countries as much as its own resources and possi- ried out several EU-funded projects, and in 2000 bilities allowed it to do so. received, for the first time, core funding from the European Commission. In 1998, ILGA-Europe was granted consultative status with the Council of Eu- rope. More and detailed information about these 1 Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, OJ 2000 L 303/16, and Council Decision 2000/750/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a Community action programme to combat discrimination (2001-2006), OJ 2000 L 303/23. 2 HOSI Wien/Auslandsgruppe (Gudrun Hauer, Kurt Krickler, Marek, Dieter Schmutzer – eds.): Rosa Liebe unterm roten Stern. Zur Lage der Lesben und Schwulen in Osteuropa. Frühlings Erwachen, Hamburg 1984. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The ILGA-Europe Executive Board gratefully acknowledges the contributions which made this report possible: Financial support: This report was produced as part of a project supported by the Open Society Institute. Production and editing: We would like to thank Tatjana Greif and Adrian Coman for the co-ordination of this project, all authors of the accession country reports, and Mark Bell for writing chapter 14. We also want to express our gratitude to Jackie Lewis, Mark Bell, Pierre Noël and Kurt Krickler for editing this report, also to Helmut Graupner for proof-reading the legal information contained in this report. Finances and accounting: We would like to thank Steffen Jensen and Nigel Warner, ILGA-Europe treasurers, also Florin Ghiþã, ACCEPT (Bucharest Acceptance Group) Office Manager, for taking care of the finances and ac- counting of this project. Design and layout: We are grateful to Lucian David for the final design and layout and to Mark Bell and Christian Högl for their support. The Executive Board of ILGA-Europe, Brussels, March 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS: Introduction.........................................................................................................7 Bulgaria..............................................................................................................9 Cyprus..............................................................................................................13 The Czech Republic........................................................................................18 Estonia.............................................................................................................23 Hungary............................................................................................................29 Latvia................................................................................................................35 Lithuania..............................................................................................................44 Malta.................................................................................................................48 Poland..............................................................................................................50 Romania...........................................................................................................55 Slovakia............................................................................................................65 Slovenia...........................................................................................................69 Turkey...............................................................................................................76 The EU – a new source of rights for citizens in the accession countries?.....80 Appendix 1: More Information about the EU.................................................90 Appendix 2: Contributors and LGBT groups in the accession countries.....94 Introduction ILGA - EUROPE Introduction Three years after the publication of the “Equality vice, military service, migration and asylum seek- Report”1 on the situation of lesbians and gay men ers. The authors of the country reports also tried to in the EU Member States, ILGA-Europe has pro- cover the social factors which clearly mirror the duced the current report, “Equality for Lesbians and above mentioned legal factors, e. g. public opinion, Gay Men - A Relevant Issue in the EU Accession homophobia, the approach of the media, violence Process”, with a view to filling the information gap against gays and lesbians, and the influence of regarding the situation for lesbians and gay men in churches and religions. Positive developments and the candidate countries. The report was produced information on the infrastructure of the LGBT com- as part of the project “Lesbian and Gay People in munity and culture are also reported, together with Candidate Countries to EU Membership” with fi- recommendations for improving the legal and so- nancial support from the Open Society Institute. cial status of lesbians and gay men. All 13 accession countries are represented with in- In conclusion, two things are evident from all the dividual reports: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, information presented in this book. First, it is clear Cyprus, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, that sexual orientation discrimination and homopho- Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Turkey. bic attitudes are widespread in the accession coun- A further chapter presents the European Union’s leg- tries; and secondly, that addressing this discrimina-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Production and the Canonisation of LGBT Histories in the Baltic States
    SQS Cultural Production and the Canonisation 1–2/2020 of LGBT Histories in the Baltic States 22 Clinton Glenn QueerScope Articles ABSTRACT Introduction This article examines three exhibitions held in the Baltic States that laid claim to being the first LGBT exhibitions that engaged with national In his 2018 article “Contemporary Art and Alternative Queer Archival history and identity in their respective contexts. These exhibitions include: From Dusk to Dawn: 20 Years of LGBT Freedom in Lithuania Strategies in Central and Eastern Europe,” Polish art historian and (Vilnius, Lithuania, 2013); Untold Stories (Tallinn, Estonia, 2011); and curator Paweł Leszkowicz describes how in the post-communist region Slash: Between the Normative and the Fantasy (Rīga, Latvia, 2015). of Europe, the state has the dominant role in “shaping and ideologically In my analysis I interrogate how these exhibitions critically engaged controlling historical commemoration,” which with the rise of conservative with transnational debates in LGBT and queer politics, while reflecting local understandings of national and sexual identity – as evidenced nationalism it has been accompanied by a “fixation on a heroic or traumatic in the exhibitions’ curatorial strategies, catalogues and curatorial national past” (2018, 74). In the three Baltic States – Estonia, Latvia, and statements, and in the artists and artworks presented. Lithuania – this can be exemplified in the promotion of national culture and language in the frame of 100 years of independence, celebrated in 2018.1 ABSTRAKTI This form of nationalist celebration leaves little room for voices silenced Artikkelissa tarkastellaan kolmea Baltian maissa järjestettyä näyttelyä, joita pidetään ensimmäisinä kansallista historiaa omissa konteks- from official rhetoric, such as local LGBT communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report for Use in Refugee Claims Based on Persecution Relating to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
    Turkey Country Report for use in refugee claims based on persecution relating to sexual orientation and gender identity Produced: January 20, 2010 Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity research – [email protected] International Human Rights Program University of Toronto This document was prepared by law students and highlights information about publicly-accessible country conditions available at the time it was prepared. It is not exhaustive, nor is it updated on a regular basis. The information provided here is not a substitute for legal advice or legal assistance, and the International Human Rights program at the University of Toronto, Faculty of Law cannot provide such advice or assistance. I: Introduction This report reveals that while homosexuality in Turkey is not considered a criminal act, Turkey remains a society where discrimination and persecution based on sexual orientation and gender identity exists both in civil society and in the military. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in Turkey face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. This can be partially attributed to the conservative values embedded in Turkish society. In civil society, there are numerous reports of persons who have been victim of violence based on sexual orientation. LGBT Turks are vulnerable to physical and verbal harassment and abuse from police officers. Judges and prosecutors also share a dismissive attitude toward reports of persecution. Numerous media outlets have reported incidences of persecution based on sexual orientation, including murder. In the military context, Turkey has adopted a “don‟t ask, don‟t tell” policy, similar to that of the United States. Homosexuality is therefore permitted in the military context, so long as it does not pose a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • De Ani 15-24
    DE ANI 15-24 MARTIE 2019 12 Festival Internațional de Documentar și Drepturile Omului 15-24 MARTIE 2019 12 Festival Internațional de Documentar și Drepturile Omului CINEMA ELVIRE POPESCO CINEMATECA EFORIE CINEMATECA UNION ARCUB POINT PAVILION 32 INFO & BILETE WWW.ONEWORLD.RO FACEBOOK: ONE.WORLD.ROMANIA ORGANIZATOR / ORGANIZER Asociația One World Romania PARTENER PRINCIPAL / MAIN PARTNER Programul Statul de Drept Europa de Sud Est al Fundației Konrad Adenauer CU SPRIJINUL / WITH THE SUPPORT OF Administrația Fondului Cultural Național, Centrul Național al Cinematografiei, Primăria Capitalei prin ARCUB – Centrul Cultural al Municipiului București, UNHCR – Agenția ONU pentru Refugiați, Reprezentanța Comisiei Eu- ropene în România, Uniunea Cineaștilor din România, DACIN-SARA, Organizația Internațională pentru Migrație, Institutul Cultural Român, Institutul de Investigare a Crimelor Comunismului și Memoria Exilului Românesc, Con- siliul Național pentru Combaterea Discriminării, Agenția de Cooperare Internaționalâ pentru Dezvoltare - RoAid SPONSORI / SPONSORS BOSCH, Aqua Carpatica, Domeniile Sâmburești CINEMA ELVIRE POPESCO PARTENERI / PARTNERS Ambasada Franței în România, Institutul Francez din București, Goethe-Institut București, Ambasada Statelor PARTENERI CINEMATECA EFORIE Unite ale Americii, Ambasada Regatului Țărilor de Jos în România, Forumul Cultural Austriac, Swiss Sponsor’s Fund, Ambasada Elveției în România, British Council, Ambasada Statului Palestina, Centrul Cultural Palestin- CINEMATECA UNION ian “Mahmoud Darwish”, Festivalul
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Violations on the Basis of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Homosexuality in the Philippines
    Human Rights Violations on the Basis of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Homosexuality in the Philippines Submitted for consideration at the 106 th Session of the Human Rights Committee for the fourth periodic review of the Philippines October 2012 COALITION REPORT Submitted by: International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) www.IGLHRC.org LGBT AND HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS: INDIVIDUAL LGBT ACTIVISTS: 1. Babaylanes, Inc. 1. Aleksi Gumela 2. Amnesty International Philippines - LGBT Group (AIPh-LGBT) 2. Alvin Cloyd Dakis 3. Bacolod and Negros Gender Identity Society (BANGIS) 3. Arnel Rostom Deiparine 4. Bisdak Pride – Cebu 4. Bemz Benedito 5. Cagayan De Oro Plus (CDO Plus) 5. Carlos Celdran 6. Changing Lane Women’s Group 6. Ian Carandang 7. Coalition for the Liberation of the Reassigned Sex (COLORS) 7. Mae Emmanuel 8. Elite Men’s Circle (EMC) 8. Marion Cabrera 9. EnGendeRights, Inc. 9. Mina Tenorio 10. Filipino Freethinkers (FF) 10. Neil Garcia 11. Fourlez Women’s Group 11. Raymond Alikpala 12. GAYAC (Gay Achievers Club) 12. Ryan Sylverio 13. KABARO-PUP 13. Santy Layno 14. LADLAD Cagayan De Oro 15. LADLAD Caraga, Inc. 16. LADLAD Europa 17. LADLAD LGBT Party 18. LADLAD Region II 19. Lesbian Activism Project Inc. (LeAP!), Inc. 20. Lesbian Piipinas 21. Link Davao 22. Metropolitan Community Church – Metro Baguio City (MCCMB) 23. Miss Maanyag Gay Organization of Butuan 24. OUT Exclusives Women’s Group 25. OUT Philippines LGBT Group 26. Outrage LGBT Magazine 27. Philippine Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches (MCC) 28. Philippine Forum on Sports, Culture, Sexuality and Human Rights (TEAM PILIPINAS) 29. Pink Watch (formerly Philippine LGBT Hate Crime Watch (PLHCW) ) 30.
    [Show full text]
  • ARES Update No. 1
    YEAR 1, NO. 1 25 APRIL 2014 Update How films and culture can help young LGBT adults How film and culture can help 12 November 2013 - Welcome to the first newsletter of the ARES project. ARES young LGBT adults... 1 stands for the “Artistic Educational System for the Social Inclusion of young Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender adults”. The project is a Grundtvig Partners across Europe... 2 Learning Partnership funded by Lifelong Learning Programme from 2013 to 2015. Kick-off for international ARES aims to develop exchange… 3 educational strategies Spring Festival in Montevarchi… 3 for the social and civil Amsterdam Pink Film Days… 4 inclusion of young lesbian, gay, bisexual Screening and focus group style and transgender adult workshop in London… 4 people from diverse Screening and workshops in cultural and ethnic Szczecin… 4 backgrounds across the Movie nights in Tallinn… 5 European Union. ARES Reviewing educational films can aims to promote the use mobilize youth…. 5 of LGBT artistic and cultural media (ACM) including cinema, theatre and literature, as an effective platform to: provide young LGBT adults with pathways to improve their knowledge and skills in order to manage and be critical about artistic messages (deconstructing negative or prejudiced messages of media); and to exchange knowledge and understanding of the issues they currently face in order to raise public awareness, achieve social acceptance, improve social skills and develop powerful communication tools. The ARES consortium has two key objectives: 1) to demonstrate that artistic education using ACM will facilitate learning and demonstrate how artistic education benefits young LGBT adults socially and culturally; 2) to promote a dialogue between local government, adult education providers, cultural associations and experts with LGBT associations concerning public policies to tackle homophobia and transphobia using ACM as a vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-27 Watch No 8
    EU-27 WATCH No. 8 ISSN 1610-6458 Issued in March 2009 Edited by the Institute for European Politics (IEP), Berlin in collaboration with the Austrian Institute of International Affairs, Vienna Institute for International Relations, Zagreb Bulgarian European Community Studies Association, Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Sofia Academy of Sciences, Budapest Center for European Studies / Middle East Technical Institute for Strategic and International Studies, University, Ankara Lisbon Centre européen de Sciences Po, Paris Institute of International and European Affairs, Centre d’étude de la vie politique, Université libre de Dublin Bruxelles Institute of International Relations, Prague Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Européennes Institute of International Relations and Political Robert Schuman, Luxembourg Science, Vilnius University Centre of International Relations, Ljubljana Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome Cyprus Institute for Mediterranean, European and Latvian Institute of International Affairs, International Studies, Nicosia Riga Danish Institute for International Studies, Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, Copenhagen University of Malta Elcano Royal Institute and UNED University, Madrid Netherlands Institute of International Relations European Institute of Romania, Bucharest ‘Clingendael’, The Hague Federal Trust for Education and Research, London Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Bratislava Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: “We Don´T Want Islam in Czech Republic”
    Case Study: We Don´t Want Islam in Czech Republic Jaroslav Valuch May 2018 Summary Martin Konvicka, co-founder and leader of the “We Don't Want Islam in Czech Republic” initiative (Islám v České republice nechceme – IVCRN) and one of its derivative movements, “Bloc Against Islam,” is currently under police investigation and awaiting trial for inciting hatred via comments on the Facebook page of the initiative. Inciting hatred against a group of persons or restricting their rights is a criminal offence according to the Czech legal code. This initiative started in 2009 as a very successful Facebook page community (the page had up to 160,000 followers in January 2016 before it was blocked by Facebook). It then morphed into a political movement with aspirations to gain representation in the Senate and parliament. At the height of his public political career, Konvicka and Bloc Against Islam received the endorsement of the President of the Czech Republic, who publicly supported the initiative by delivering a speech on their stage on November 17th 2015, the National Day of Fighting for Freedom and Democracy (anniversary of 1989 Velvet revolution). Konvicka decided to run in the Senate election in October 2016 with his new initiative called Alternative for Czech Republic (directly inspired by the German Alternative fur Deutschland). His run ended in failure, and he finished second from the bottom. Dangerous Speech Framework Analysis Social and Historical Context Since the rise of violent right-wing extremism after the Czech Velvet Revolution in 1989, measures to counter extremism (such as the training of security forces and the adoption of extremism and hate crime legislation) have been gradually implemented.1 The threat has received serious attention from even the highest political figures.
    [Show full text]
  • (SRHR) in European Institutions. by Elena
    Study for POLICY MAKERS on opposition to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in European institutions. by Elena Zacharenko Anti-gender mobilisations in Europe Study for policy makers on opposition to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in European institutions Author: Elena Zacharenko This study has been commissioned by Heidi Hautala MEP, Vice President of the European Parliament. Published in December 2020 Book cover illustration, design and layout by Laura Ospina - www.lauraennube.com 2 Table of CONTENTS Foreword from MEP Heidi Hautala.............................................................04 Executive summary.......................................................................................06 What is this study and who is it for? ........................................................... 08 Part 1: What drives the anti-gender movement?...........................................10 1.1 Origins and current manifestations...........................................................12 1.2 Global connections ..................................................................................13 1.3 The anti-gender movement in the EU...................................................... 16 1.4 Is it a backlash?........................................................................................23 1.5 Recommendations...................................................................................24 Part 2: Main anti-gender actors and their tactics at EU level........................26 2.1 Lobbying organisations
    [Show full text]
  • IGLHRC Book Romania 7/23/03 10:43 AM Page 155
    IGLHRC Book Romania 7/23/03 10:43 AM Page 155 Romania Ingrid Baciu, Vera Cîmpeanu, and Mona Nicoara omania is one of the few European states that makes homosexuality a crime. Consensual same-sex relations Rbetween adults, even if they take place in private, are illegal. A 1994 decision of the Constitutional Court overruled some of these legal restrictions, but maintained a discrimi- natory age of consent for same-sex sexual relations as com- pared to heterosexual sex. The Parliament has been review- ing the law for the past two years, but, as of April 1995, no final decision has been made. Moreover, some of the legal formulations under consideration before the Parliament hardly represent a step forward from the current statute. The criminalization of same-sex relations has hampered the development of a lesbian community, much less the devel- opment of any lesbian advocacy groups. Lesbians experience the same disadvantages as all women in Romanian society, and in addition, they are sub- ject to the stigma that the general public attaches to homo- sexuality. IGLHRC Book Romania 7/23/03 10:43 AM Page 156 156 UNSPOKEN RULES LEGAL RESTRICTIONS Same-sex relations are criminalized in Romania under Arti- cle 200 of the Penal Code, which specifies that: Same-sex relations shall be punished by prison from one to five years. If the deed provided under Para. 1 is perpetrated upon a minor or upon an individual unable to protect him/herself or to express his/her will, or by means of force, the punishment shall be prison from two to seven years.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Human Rights Situation of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex People in Europe and Central Asia
    OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION OF LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANS AND INTERSEX PEOPLE IN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA FIND THIS REPORT ONLINE: WWW.ILGA-EUROPE.ORG THIS REVIEW COVERS THE PERIOD OF JANUARY TO DECEMBER 2019. Rue du Trône/Troonstraat 60 Brussels B-1050 Belgium Tel.: +32 2 609 54 10 Fax: + 32 2 609 54 19 [email protected] www.ilga-europe.org Design & layout: Maque Studio, www.maque.it ISBN 978-92-95066-11-3 FIND THIS REPORT ONLINE: WWW.ILGA-EUROPE.ORG Co-funded by the Rights Equality and Citizenship (REC) programme 2014-2020 of the European Union This publication has been produced with the financial support of the Rights Equality and Citizenship (REC) programme 2014-2020 of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of ILGA-Europe and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION OF LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANS, AND INTERSEX PEOPLE COVERING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY TO DECEMBER 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS KAZAKHSTAN INTRODUCTION KOSOVO* A NOTE ON DATA COLLECTION AND PRESENTATION KYRGYZSTAN HIGHLIGHTS, KEY DEVELOPMENTS AND TRENDS LATVIA INSTITUTIONAL REVIEWS LIECHTENSTEIN LITHUANIA EUROPEAN UNION LUXEMBOURG UNITED NATIONS MALTA COUNCIL OF EUROPE MOLDOVA ORGANISATION FOR SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE MONACO MONTENEGRO COUNTRY REVIEWS NETHERLANDS ALBANIA NORTH MACEDONIA ANDORRA NORWAY A ARMENIA POLAND AUSTRIA PORTUGAL AZERBAIJAN ROMANIA BELARUS RUSSIA BELGIUM SAN MARINO BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA SERBIA BULGARIA SLOVAKIA
    [Show full text]
  • National Report Estonia
    NISO PROJECT “Fighting homophobia through active citizenship and media education” No. JUST/2009/FRAC/AG/1179 – 30 – CE – 0377095/00/44 WS1: Analysing homophobic attitudes and stereotypes D1.3: National report on homophobic attitudes and stereotypes among young people Estonia Project co-funded by the European Commission, Directorate General Justice, within the Specific Program “Fundamental Rights and Citizenship” D1.3: National report on homophobic attitudes and stereotypes among young people (Estonia) Contract Number: No. JUST/2009/FRAC/AG/1179 – 30 – CE – 0377095/00/44 Project Acronym: NISO Author: Christian Veske (Sekü) Partners contributed: T6 Coop Made available to: Public Quality check: Antonella Passani (Province of Rome) Internal Reviewer: Marie Debicki (T6 Coop.) NISO Project - No. JUST/2009/FRAC/AG/1179 – 30 – CE – 0377095/00/44 2 D1.3: National report on homophobic attitudes and stereotypes among young people (Estonia) Table of Contents SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 4 1 LGBT PEOPLE’S EXPERIENCES OF UNFAIR TREATMENT IN ESTONIA ................. 5 METHODOLOGY AND PRESENTATION OF THE SAMPLE .............................................................. 5 EXPERIENCES OF UNEQUAL TREATMENT ................................................................................. 8 STEREOTYPES AND REASONS BEHIND THEM .......................................................................... 10 DEVELOPMENTS IN SOCIETY ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]