DOCSLIB.ORG

Chronology of Pesticides Used on National Park Service Collections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chronology of Pesticides Used on National Park Service Collections Conserve O Gram June 2001 Number 2/16 Chronology Of Pesticides Used On National Park Service Collections The history of National Park Service pesticide use publication). Synonyms and trade names were policy for museum collection objects is obtained from the Merck Index, notes from the documented in various publications including IPM Coordinator, and two Internet sites Field Manual for Museums (Burns), Manual for (<http://chemfinder.com> and <http:// Museums (Lewis), versions of the Museum www.cdpr.ca.gov/cgi-bin/epa>). Handbook, Part I, and two versions of the Integrated Pest Management Information Manual. Not all of the chemicals listed in the Other non-policy sources include Coleman's accompanying charts were marketed as pesticides. Manual for Small Museums, object treatment Some are fungicides and microbiocides. One, reports and notes from NPS staff, and notes from Lexol, is a leather preservative and consolidant. the Office of the Integrated Pest Management All of these are included here because records (IPM) Coordinator. indicate they were applied to objects as pesticides. The two accompanying charts list the types of The potential for pesticide residue remaining on pesticides that may have been used on National collection objects is very high. Objects with such Park Service collections along with some common residues pose a health risk to curatorial staff and synonyms and trade names. to the public who come into physical contact with them, unless proper precautions are taken. Dates shown in blue on the chart represent Additional information on health and safety issues published recommendations for the use of and protective measures can be found in the pesticides. Those shown in red refer to Museum Handbook, Part I, Chapter 8, and several conservation treatment reports and other file Conserve O Grams. notations that confirm the use of pesticides on specific objects or collections. References While there is a strong probability that chemicals Burns, Ned J. Field Manual for Museums. recommended in NPS policy documents were used Washington, D.C.: National Park Service, 1941. with some frequency, few records exist for confirmation. It is also possible that some of the Coleman, Laurence V. Manual for Small chemicals were in use before the listed publication Museums. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1927. dates and that their use might have continued even after new pesticides were being recommended. Lewis, Ralph, H. Manual for Museums. The use of DDT in the 1970s is an example of the Washington, D.C.: National Park Service, 1976. latter; DDT was banned in 1972. _____. Museum Curatorship in the National Park With the exception of Swan Song (chemical Service 1904-1982. Washington, D.C.: National unidentified), the pesticides listed on the chart Park Service, 1993. prior to 1941 are from Lewis or Coleman (Coleman's book, published in 1927, was the main reference for NPS collections until Burns's 1941 National Park Service Conserve O Gram 2/16 National Park Service. "Chapter 3: Museum • Fort Davis National Historic Site, 1983 Collections." Museum Handbook, Part I. • Fort Donelson National Battlefield, 1986 Washington, D.C.: National Park Service, 1967. • Fort Laramie National Historic Site, 1992 • Mesa Verde National Park, 1988 _____. "Section XXIII: Museum Pests." IPM • Virgin Islands National Park, 1993 Information Manual. Washington, D.C.: National • Yellowstone National Park, 1997 Park Service, 1985. Department of the Interior Museum: Notes from _____. "Museum Pests." Integrated Pest nd conservation treatment records in museum files. Management Manual. 2 ed. <http://www.nature.nps.gov/wv/ipm/ Responses from a pesticide survey conducted by manual.htm> Museum Management Program (MMP) intern Barbara Hammond in 1999 on file in the MMP _____. "Chapter 5: Biological Infestations." office. The survey included the following parks, Museum Handbook, Part I. Washington, D.C.: offices, and centers: National Park Service, 1998. • Western Archeological and Conservation Center Windholz, Martha, ed. The Merck Index. Tenth • Harpers Ferry Center edition. Rahway, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc., 1983. • Denali National Park and Preserve • Katmai National Park and Preserve Additional Sources of Pesticide • Alaska Support Office Documentation: • Crater Lake National Park • Bandelier National Monument Harpers Ferry Center: Conservation Treatment • Hubbell Trading Post National Historic records in the Office of the Registrar. Site • Harpers Ferry National Historic Park: Notes Fort Davis National Historic Site from conservation treatment records in park files. Pesticide Use Proposal System (PUPS) database Collection Management Plans from the following in the Integrated Pest Management Program parks: Office, Exotic Species Management and Ecosystem Restoration Branch, Biological • Andrew Johnson National Historic Site, Resource Management Division, National Park 1992 Service. • Aztec Ruins National Monument, 1980 • Bandelier National Monument, 1980 • Big Hole National Battlefield, 1990 Melanie Pereira, Intern • Everglades National Park, 1989 Barbara Hammond, Intern Museum Management Program National Park Service The Conserve O Gram series is published as a reference on collections The series is distributed to all NPS units and is available to non-NPS management and curatorial issues. Mention of a product, a manufacturer, institutions and interested individuals by subscription through the or a supplier by name in this publication does not constitute an Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, endorsement of that product or supplier by the National Park Service. Washington, DC 20402; FAX (202) 512-2250. For further information Sources named are not all inclusive. It is suggested that readers also seek and guidance concerning any of the topics or procedures addressed in the alternative product and vendor information in order to assess the full range series, contact NPS Museum Management Program, 1849 C Street NW of available supplies and equipment. (NC 230), Washington, DC 20240; (202) 343-8142. 2 Chronology of Pesticides used on National Park Service Collections • Arsenic used in 1941, 1949, 1956, 1958 to 1962, 1968 to 1970, and 1976. • Baygone used from 1977 to 1978 and in 1980. • Benzethonium Chloride used in 1941 and 1976. • Benzol used in 1941. • Boric Acid used from 1976 to 1979, 1983, 1986 to 1988, 1991 to 1992, 1996 to 1997 and 2000. • Camphor Gum used in 1941. • Carbon disulfide used from 1926 to 1941. • Carbon tetrachloride used in 1941. • Chloroform used in 1941. • Chlordane used in 1967, 1969, 1972 to 1974, 1976, and from 1979 to 1980. Heavy use in 1973. • Chloretone used in 1941. • Chlorpyrifos used from 1978 to 1979 and 1983 to 1985. • Combat used in 1996. • Contrac Rat and Mouse Bait used in 1997. • Copper 8 quinolate used from 1974 to 1975. • Cuprinol Clear used in 1961, 1978, and 1988. • Cyanide used in 1966, 1968, 1971, and 1977. • DDT used in 1967, 1975, and 1977. • Diazinon used from 1978 to 1980. • Dichlorvos used in 1971, 1977, and from 1979 to 1991. • Dowfume 5, or 75% ethylene dichloride and 25% carbon tetrachloride, used in 1941, from 1950 to 1970, and in 1985. Heavy use in 1967. • Dri-Die used in 1969, 1975, and 1980. • Drione used from 1984 to 1988. • Ethion used in 1997. • Ethylene dichloride used in 1941 and 1967. • Ethylene oxide used from 1975 to 1976, 1978 to 1980, 1984, and in 1999. Pesticide Chronology • Formalin used in 1963, 1967, 1971, 1972, and 1976. • Hydrocyanic acid gas used in 1941. • Lexol used from 1967 to 1970 and 1974. • Lindane used in 1976. • Malathion used in 1979. • Mercuric chloride used in 1941 and from 1970 to 1980. • Methyl Bromide used in 1999. • Methyl formate, the carbon dioxide mix, used in 1941. • Naphthalene used in 1941, 1963, 1982 to 1987, 1989, 1994, and 1999. • Orkin aid 4E used in 1978. • Ortho-dichlorobenzene used in 1941. • Paradichlorobenzene (PDB) used in 1927, 1939, 1941 to 194, 1967 to 1969, 1976 to 1990, and 1996 to 1997. Heavy use in 1983, 1984, and 1987 to 1990. • Paranitrophenol used in 1970 and 1973 to 1976. Heavy use in 1974. • Pentachlorophenol used in 1965, 1972, 1974, and 1975. • Permethrin used from 1997 to 1999. • Phenol used in 1941. • Potassium cyanide used in 1941. • Premise 75 used in 1997. • Pyrethrins used in 1939, 1941, 1943, 1984 to 1989, and 1997 to 1998. • Pyrethrum used in 1939, 1941, 1942, 1985, and 1997. Heavy use in 1941. • Quintox mouse seed used from 1997 to 1998. • Recruit used from 1997 to 1998. • Roach Rid used in 1997. • Rozol used in 1986. • Sodium fluoride used in 1941. • Swan Song used in 1939 and 1949. • Thymol used from 1935 to 1941, 196, 1976 to 1977, 1989 to 1990, and 1993. • Vikane used in 1979, 1985 to 1987, and 1998 to 1999. • Warfarin used in 1984 and 1987. • Zinc Chloride used in 1941. Chronology ofPesticides Usedon NationalPark ServiceCollections Synonyms and Trade Names of Pesticides National ParkServiceConserveO Arsenic arsenical soap Baygone o-isopropoxyphenyl n- Bifex Blattanex Invisi-Gard Propyon Suncide Sendran methyl-carbamate Benzethonium Hyamine 1622 hemerol chloride Phemeride Phemithyn Quatrachlor Solamin BZT Chloride Benzol cyclohexatriene benzene coal naptha Boric Acid Perma Dust PT240 It Works Drax Ant Kill BoraCare JECTA BORID Ultracide Camphor Gum 2-camphanone 2-boranone Japan Formosa camphor laurel camphor Chigarid camphor Carbon disulfide dithiocarbonic carbon anhydride bisulfide Carbon Benzinoform Freon 10 Halon 104 Tetraform Tetrasol Necatorina tetrachloride Chloroform trichloromethane methyl trichloride formyl
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ri Wkh% Lrorjlfdo (Iihfwv Ri 6Hohfwhg &Rqvwlwxhqwv
    Guidelines for Interpretation of the Biological Effects of Selected Constituents in Biota, Water, and Sediment November 1998 NIATIONAL RRIGATION WQATER UALITY P ROGRAM INFORMATION REPORT No. 3 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Fish and Wildlife Service Geological Survey Bureau of Indian Affairs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ntroduction The guidelines, criteria, and other information in The Limitations of This Volume this volume were originally compiled for use by personnel conducting studies for the It is important to note five limitations on the Department of the Interior's National Irrigation material presented here: Water Quality Program (NIWQP). The purpose of these studies is to identify and address (1) Out of the hundreds of substances known irrigation-induced water quality and to affect wetlands and water bodies, this contamination problems associated with any of volume focuses on only nine constituents or the Department's water projects in the Western properties commonly identified during States. When NIWQP scientists submit NIWQP studies in the Western United samples of water, soil, sediment, eggs, or animal States—salinity, DDT, and the trace tissue for chemical analysis, they face a elements arsenic, boron, copper, mercury, challenge in determining the sig-nificance of the molybdenum, selenium, and zinc.
    [Show full text]
  • Carpenter Ants and Control in Homes Page 1 of 6
    Carpenter Ants and Control in Homes Page 1 of 6 Carpenter Ants and Control in Homes Fact Sheet No. 31 Revised May 2000 Dr. Jay B Karren, Extension Entomologist Alan H. Roe, Insect Diagnostician Introduction Carpenter ants are members of the insect order Hymenoptera, which includes bees, wasps, sawflies, and other ants. Carpenter ants can be occasional pests in the home and are noted particularly for the damage they can cause when nesting in wood. In Utah they are more of a nuisance rather than a major structural pest. Carpenter ants, along with a number of other ant species, utilize cavities in wood, particularly stumps and logs in decayed condition, as nesting sites. They are most abundant in forests and can be easily found under loose bark of dead trees, stumps, or fallen logs. Homeowners may bring them into their homes when they transport infested logs from forests to use as firewood. Description Carpenter ants include species that are among the largest ants found in the United States. They are social insects with a complex and well-defined caste system. The worker ants are sterile females and may occur in different sizes (majors and minors). Members of the reproductive caste (fertile males and females) are usually winged prior to mating. All ants develop from eggs deposited by a fertilized female (queen). The eggs hatch into grub-like larvae (immatures) which are fed and cared for by the workers. When fully grown, the larvae spin a cocoon and enter the pupal stage. The pupal stage is a period of transformation from the larva to adult.
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion & Information on Boric Acid
    Opinion & Information on Boric Acid By Michael R. Cartwright, Sr. (Michael R. Cartwright, Sr. is a third generation licensed professional in the fields of structural pest control and building construction and is also licensed in agriculture pest control. His qualifications are too extensive to print but are available on request from The Reporter.) Over the past years I have seen, in many homes and restaurants, boric acid covering everything. Carpets, floors, toys and furniture, in kitchen cabinets, on counter tops and tables, in refrigerators, clothing, etc. Why? Because environmentalists, helped by an uninformed news media, tell them to. Why don't the news media also explain the possible dangers of applying something not normally found in the home environment, that you or your animals will come in direct contact with? I'm writing this article even though a California environmentalist group advised me not to say anything against boric acid and that I would pay dearly for only trying to mislead the public. My company uses a lot of boric acid, but not as described above. Under an OSHA Hazard Communication Standard, based on animal chronic toxicity studies of inorganic borate chemicals, boric acid and/or borates are Hazardous Materials. California has identified boric acid as a hazardous waste. The above information is taken from Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) 25-80-2320 (Section 2 and 13) supplied by U.S. Borax Inc. (the major supplier of borax to many industries). The National Academy of Sciences reports that children may be uniquely sensitive to chemicals and pesticide residues because of their rapid tissue growth and development.
    [Show full text]
  • PLEASE CHECK for LATEST PART INFORMATION 0386006603 Active
    This document was generated on 07/30/2021 PLEASE CHECK WWW.MOLEX.COM FOR LATEST PART INFORMATION Part Number: 0386006603 Status: Active Overview: Beau Barrier Strips Description: 6.35mm Pitch Beau PCB Tri-Barrier Terminal Strip, without Mounting Ends, 300V, 3 Circuits Documents: 3D Model 3D Model (PDF) Drawing (PDF) RoHS Certificate of Compliance (PDF) General Series image - Reference only Product Family Terminal Blocks Series 38600 EU ELV Application N/A Not Relevant Component Type One Piece Overview Beau Barrier Strips EU RoHS China RoHS Product Name Fixed Mount Barrier Compliant Type Barrier Strip REACH SVHC UPC 800756242606 Contained Per - D(2020)4578-DC (25 Physical June 2020) Circuits (Loaded) 3 henicosafluoroundecanoic Circuits (maximum) 3 acid Color - Resin Black disodium 4- Entry Angle Horizontal amino-3-[[4'-[(2,4- Lock to Mating Part None diaminophenyl)azo] Material - Metal Brass chromium trioxide Material - Plating Mating Tin 1,3-propanesultone Material - Plating Termination Tin 1-vinylimidazole Material - Resin Polyester Alloy 4,4'-methylenedi-o- Number of Rows 1 toluidine Orientation Horizontal dibutyltin dichloride PC Tail Length 5.10mm methoxyacetic acid PCB Thickness - Recommended 3.18mm 1,2- Panel Mount No Benzenedicarboxylic Pitch - Mating Interface 6.35mm acid, bis(3- Pitch - Termination Interface 6.35mm methylbutyl) Polarized to Mating Part No disodium 3,3'-[[1,1'- Shrouded Tri-Barrier biphenyl]-4,4'- Stackable No diylbis(azo) Surface Mount Compatible (SMC) No octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane Temperature Range - Operating
    [Show full text]
  • Past Use of Chlordane, Dieldrin, And
    The Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response Office (HEER Office) is part of the Hawai‘i Department of Health (HDOH) Environmental Health Administration, whose mission is to protect human health and the environment. The HEER Office provides leadership, support, and partnership in preventing, planning for, responding to, and enforcing environmental laws relating to releases or threats of releases of hazardous substances. Past Use of Chlordane, Dieldrin, and other Organochlorine Pesticides for Termite Control in Hawai‘i: Safe Management Practices around Treated Foundations or during Building Demolition This fact sheet provides building owners, demolition and construction contractors, developers, realtors, and others with an overview of the potential environmental concerns associated with the past use of organochlorine termiticides (pesticides used to control termites) in Hawai‘i. In addition, this fact sheet discusses methods for reducing exposure to organochlorine termiticides during building demolition or around the foundations of treated buildings and identifies resources for further information. What are organochlorine termiticides? Organochlorine termiticides are a group of pesticides that were used for termite control in and around wooden buildings and homes from the mid-1940s to the late 1980s. These organochlorine pesticides included chlordane, aldrin, dieldrin, heptachlor, and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT). They were used primarily by pest control operators in Hawaii’s urban areas, but also by homeowners, the military, the state, and counties to protect buildings against termite damage. In the 1970s and 1980s, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) banned all uses of these organochlorine pesticides except for heptachlor, which can be used today only for control of fire ants in underground power transformers.
    [Show full text]
  • Transfer of Ingested Insecticides Among Cockroaches: Effects of Active Ingredient, Bait Formulation, and Assay Procedures
    HOUSEHOLD AND STRUCTURAL INSECTS Transfer of Ingested Insecticides Among Cockroaches: Effects of Active Ingredient, Bait Formulation, and Assay Procedures 1 2 1, 3 GRZEGORZ BUCZKOWSKI, ROBERT J. KOPANIC, JR., AND COBY SCHAL J. Econ. Entomol. 94(5): 1229Ð1236(2001) ABSTRACT Foraging cockroaches ingest insecticide baits, translocate them, and can cause mor- tality in untreated cockroaches that contact the foragers or ingest their excretions. Translocation of eight ingested baits by adult male Blattella germanica (L.) was examined in relation to the type of the active ingredient, formulation, and foraging area. Ingested boric acid, chlorpyrifos, Þpronil, and hydramethylnon that were excreted by adults in small dishes killed 100% of Þrst instars within 10 d and Ͼ50% of second instars within 14 d. Residues from these ingested baits were also highly effective on nymphs in larger arenas and killed 16Ð100% of the adults. However, when the baits and dead cockroaches were removed from the large arenas and replaced with new cockroaches, only residues of the slow-acting hydramethylnon killed most of the nymphs and adults, whereas residues of fast acting insecticides (chlorpyrifos and Þpronil) killed fewer nymphs and adults. Excretions from cockroaches that ingested abamectin baits failed to cause signiÞcant mortality in cockroaches that contacted the residues. These results suggest that hydramethylnon is highly effective in these assays because cockroaches that feed on the bait have ample time to return to their shelter and defecate insecticide-laden feces. The relatively high concentration of hydramethylnon in the bait (2.15%) and its apparent stability in the digestive tract and feces probably contribute to the efÞcacy of hydra- methylnon.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Listed Wastes Table 1: Maximum Concentration of Contaminants For
    EPA Listed Wastes Table 1: Maximum concentration of contaminants for the toxicity characteristic, as determined by the TCLP (D list) Regulatory HW No. Contaminant CAS No. Level (mg/L) D004 Arsenic 7440-38-2 5.0 D005 Barium 7440-39-3 100.0 D0018 Benzene 71-43-2 0.5 D006 Cadmium 7440-43-9 1.0 D019 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 0.5 D020 Chlordane 57-74-9 0.03 D021 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 100.0 D022 Chloroform 67-66-3 6.0 D007 Chromium 7440-47-3 5.0 D023 o-Cresol 95-48-7 200.0** D024 m-Cresol 108-39-4 200.0** D025 p-Cresol 106-44-5 200.0** D026 Cresol ------------ 200.0** D016 2,4-D 94-75-7 10.0 D027 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 7.5 D028 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.5 D029 1,1-Dichloroethylene 75-35-4 0.7 D030 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 0.13* D012 Endrin 72-20-8 0.02 D031 Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.008 D032 Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 0.13* D033 Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 0.5 D034 Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 3.0 D008 Lead 7439-92-1 5.0 D013 Lindane 58-89-9 0.4 D009 Mercury 7439-97-6 0.2 D014 Methoxychlor 72-43-5 10.0 D035 Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 200.0 D036 Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 2.0 D037 Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 100.0 D038 Pyridine 110-86-1 5.0* D010 Selenium 7782-49-2 1.0 D011 Silver 7740-22-4 5.0 D039 Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 0.7 D015 Toxaphene 8001-35-2 0.5 D040 Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 0.5 D041 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 400.0 D042 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 2.0 D017 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 1.0 D043 Vinyl Chloride 74-01-4 0.2 * Quantitation limit is greater than the calculated regulatory level.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Consultation Chevron Chemical Co
    - • ! t Health Consultation Chevron Chemical Co. (Ortho Division) Orlando, Orange County, Florida CERCLIS NO. FLD004064242 June 1995 Prepared by Environmental Toxicology The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services Under a Cooperative Agreement With Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry U.S. Public Health Service Department of Health and Human Services - ' ' Health Consultation - Chevron Chemical June 1995 Background and Statement of Issues The purpose of this health consultation is to interpret the results of indoor air monitoring for pesticides in two trailers adjacent to the Chevron Chemical Superfund site in Orlando, Florida. During a March 9, 1995 public meeting, two nearby residents expressed concerns that the insides of their trailers were contaminated with pesticides. We agreed to test their trailers for pesticide contamination. The Chevron Chemical Co. (Ortho Division) Superfund site is a former pesticide formulation plant and truck repair facility in Orlando, Florida (Figures 1-3, Appendix A). Past waste disposal practices contaminated soil and ground water. Stormwater run-off carried pesticide-contaminated soil to the adjacent Armstrong Trailer Park. In 1992, the Chevron Chemical Company removed the on-site contaminated soil. In 1994, they removed the contaminated soil from the Armstrong Trailer Park. In a 1995 public health assessment (ATSDR 1995), we found the site was a public health hazard because some residents of the adjacent Armstrong Trailer Park may have unknowingly eaten small amounts of soil contaminated with the pesticide chlordane. As a result, we estimated those residents have a moderately increased risk of liver cancer. Since Chevron cleaned up the chlordane-contaminated soil at this trailer park, we estimated the remaining cancer risk from chlordane is insignificant.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlordane and Toxaphene Residues Following Cooking of Treated Channel Catfish Fillets
    763 Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 63, No. 6, 2000, Pages 763±767 Copyright Q, International Association for Food Protection Chlordane and Toxaphene Residues following Cooking of Treated Channel Cat®sh Fillets C. R. SANTERRE,1* R. INGRAM,2 D. H. XU,3 G. W. LEWIS,4 AND L. G. LANE2 1Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1264; 2Mississippi State Chemical Laboratory, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762; 3Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849; and 4Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA MS 99-215: Received 28 July 1999/Accepted 17 December 1999 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/63/6/763/1673844/0362-028x-63_6_763.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 ABSTRACT The reduction in residues of chlordane and toxaphene following cooking (frying, baking, and smoking) of ®llets obtained from treated Channel cat®sh (Ictalurus punctatus) was determined. On average, cooking reduced moisture content by 17% and increased fat content by 28 to 274%. Frying reduced chlordane residues by 56 to 86% on a dry basis (db) or 84 to 92% on a percent fat basis (fb) when raw ®llets were compared to cooked ®llets. Baking and smoking reduced chlordane signi®cantly less (P , 0.05) than frying with reductions in residues of 12% and 9% (db) or 30% and 33% (fb), respectively. Frying reduced toxaphene residues by 40 to 49% (db) or 65 to 77% (fb), while baking and smoking reduced toxaphene by 35% and 24% (db) or 51% and 59% (fb), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards the Efficient Utilization of Geothermal Resources
    313 14th New Zealand Geothermal Workshop 1992 TOWARDS THE EFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES R. T. Harper and A. Thain Consultant, Tasman Pulp & Paper Ltd. Manager, Wairakei Geothermal Area, Electricorp - Separated geothermal water from production wells at Wairakei, Ohaaki, Kawerau, Ngawha and other less developed fields in New Zealand, contains potentially valuable chemical constituents. In particular, the extraction of precipitated amorphous silica is discussed in terms of its strategic and beneficial value to expanded energy generation in geothermal development, removal of environmentally sensitive constituents and as a marketable commodity in its own right. The prospect of recovering other minerals thereby the full potential of geothermal resources is considered. Expectations regarding high temperature reinjection could be reviewed in consideration of alternative opportunities which have been advanced in recent years. 1.0 INTRODUCTION proceeding with high temperature reinjection of part of the total separated water flow from Wairakei in an The opportunities to better utilize New Zealand's attempt to reduce the impact of geothermal water flow geothermal resources, which contribute significantly to to the Waikato river. Implementation of a reinjection the nation's wealth are addressed in this paper. The scheme at Wairakei or elsewhere, pre-empts to a degree, developments discussed here, represent a potential the options of recovering minerals and extracting further benefit to geothermal resource owners and operators, energy. Reinjection also involves a considerable capital the community and end users of minerals which are investment. The technologies believed important to the identified as being of commercial value. To date, processing of large water streams have advanced chemical processing of geothermal water has not significantly over recent years and have prompted received much attention and engineering solutions have reconsideration of the expectations of reinjection a been provided to treat separated water.
    [Show full text]
  • TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE for CHLORDANE U.S. DEPARTMENT of HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Subs
    TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR CHLORDANE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry May 1994 CHLORDANE ii DISCLAIMER The use of company or product name(s) is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. CHLORDANE iii UPDATE STATEMENT A Toxicological Profile for Chlordane was released on December 1989. This edition supersedes any previously released draft or final profile. Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary, but no less than once every three years. For information regarding the update status of previously released profiles contact ATSDR at: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Toxicology/Toxicology Information Branch 1600 Clifton Road NE, E-29 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 CHLORDANE vii CONTRIBUTORS CHEMICAL MANAGERS(S)/AUTHOR(S): Henry G. Abadin, M.S.P.H. ATSDR, Division of Toxicology, Atlanta, GA Ronald Baynes, D.V.M., M.S. Paul F. Goetchius, D.V.M. Syracuse Research Corporation, Syracuse, NY THE PROFILE HAS UNDERGONE THE FOLLOWING ATSDR INTERNAL REVIEWS: 1 . Green Border Review. Green Border review assures the consistency with ATSDR policy. 2 . Health Effects Review. The Health Effects Review Committee examines the health effects chapter of each profile for consistency and accuracy in interpreting health effects and classifying endpoints. 3 . Minimal Risk Level Review. The Minimal Risk Level Workgroup considers issues relevant to substance-specific minimal risk levels (MRLs), reviews the health effects database of each profile, and makes recommendations for derivation of MRLs. 4 . Quality Assurance Review. The Quality Assurance Branch assures that consistency across profiles is maintained, identifies any significant problems in format or content, and establishes that Guidance has been followed.
    [Show full text]
  • Household Insects – Homeowners ` CAUTION: All Insecticides Are Toxic to Some Degree; Therefore, Care Should Be Exercised in Their Use
    Household Insects – Homeowners ` CAUTION: All insecticides are toxic to some degree; therefore, care should be exercised in their use. The manufacturer’s directions on the label in the use of the material must be followed explicitly. Insect Threats Insecticides and Treatment* Remarks Ants Feed on foods and Baits (active ingredient and Remove food and clean up the area. Place (several may damage product): bait where ants occur or congregate. May species) clothing; may also sodium tetraborate decahydrate use several different baits at the same time sting, causing severe (Amdro Kills Ants Liquid Bait, Terro to discover one that ants will consume. reaction to some Liquid Ant Baits); Care should be taken not to contaminate people. hydramethylnon (Amdro Kills Ants foodstuffs. Also treat nests in yard. Follow Bait Stations and Stakes); label. orthoboric acid (Terro Perimeter Ant Bait); fipronil (Combat Max Ant Killing Bait Stations and Gel); abamectin (Raid Max Double Control Ant Baits, Raid Ant Baits III); dinotefuran (Hot Shot Ultra Clear Roach & Ant Gel Bait, Hot Shot Ultra Liquid Ant Bait); spinosad (Ortho Home Defense Liquid Ant Bait); thiamethoxam (Raid Precision Placement Ant Bait Gel) Crack and crevices: Follow label. prallethrin, esfenvalerate, pyrethrins, pyrethrum, permethrin, tetra- methrin, phenothrin, beta-cyfluthrin, cyfluthrin Indoor space: prallethrin, esfenvalerate, pyrethrins, pyrethrum, permethrin, tetramethrin, phenothrin, cyfluthrin, bifenthrin Outdoor barrier: prallethrin, esfenvalerate, permethrin, beta-cyfluthrin, cyfluthrin, bifenthrin, malathion, carbaryl Outdoor broadcast: hydramethylnon, pyriproxyfen, beta-cyfluthrin, esfenvalerate, bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, malathion, carbaryl *Labels on insecticides should state “material may be used in the household” and should be registered by the EPA for that purpose. Household Insects – Homeowners ` CAUTION: All insecticides are toxic to some degree; therefore, care should be exercised in their use.
    [Show full text]