Proc Soc Antiq ScotARCHAEOLOGY 143 (2013), 363–391 AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 363

Archaeology at the margins – RCAHMS emergency survey in the 1950s George Geddes*

ABSTRACT In the years following the Second World War, the British government made a number of changes DLPHGDWLPSURYLQJRXUVHOIVXIÀFLHQF\ZKHWKHULQIRRGVWXIIVWLPEHURUHQHUJ\7KHFRPELQDWLRQ of schemes of subsidy and improvements in technology brought with it an increasing threat to PRQXPHQWVWKDWKDGVXUYLYHGE\YLUWXHRIWKHIDFWWKDWWKH\ZHUHVLWHGLQPDUJLQDOODQG,QUHVSRQVH the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland (RCAHMS) halted its national programme of County Inventories to undertake a rescue project that used newly available aerial photographs to identify threatened unrecorded prehistoric monuments, such as brochs, forts, SDOLVDGHGVHWWOHPHQWVDQGHDUWKZRUNV$IWHUHLJKW\HDUVWKHWZRDUFKDHRORJLVWVZLWKVRPHKHOSIURP other professionals and volunteers, had recorded more than 700 sites and prepared 190 measured VXUYH\V:KLOHUHVFXHZDVLQLWLDOO\DFKLHYHGWKRXJKUHFRUGH[FDYDWLRQDQGFRPPXQLFDWLRQZLWKWKH 2UGQDQFH6XUYH\ 26 DVPDOOQXPEHUDUHQRZSURWHFWHGE\6FKHGXOLQJ7KHUHVXOWVRIWKHSURMHFW went further, helping to underpin Stuart Piggott’s development of a regional Iron Age synthesis in WKHV1RZRQOLQHIRUWKHÀUVWWLPHWKHLQIRUPDWLRQWKDWZDVSURGXFHGLVWKHPRVWGHWDLOHGWKDW H[LVWVIRUPRUHWKDQRIWKHVLWHVDQGDVZLWKDQ\GRFXPHQWDU\VRXUFHLWLVLQFXPEHQWXSRQXV to understand its strengths and weaknesses when we use it to understand, manage or protect the sites ZHFDUHIRUDQGYDOXH

INTRODUCTION In 1950, RCAHMS was a part of the small archaeological establishment, undertaking The period after the Second World War was excavations and surveys and publishing the crucial for the Royal Commission as it strove results in traditional County Inventories and to regain the impetus of the preceding decades. journals such as these Proceedings when 7KH ÀUVW SURIHVVLRQDOO\ WUDLQHG DUFKDHRORJLVW appropriate. Staff were involved in running the Dr Kenneth Steer (illus 1), had joined the Council for British Archaeology (CBA) Scottish staff in 1937, and technical innovation was Regional Group (now Archaeology Scotland) beginning to have a profound effect on both and in editing 'LVFRYHU\ DQG ([FDYDWLRQ the organisation and the whole discipline. in Scotland. Furthermore, they undertook The availability of high-quality vertical aerial H[FDYDWLRQV WR DQVZHU VSHFLÀF TXHVWLRQV WKDW photographs was of particular importance to the DURVHIURPÀHOGVXUYH\ZLWKWKHVXSSRUWRIWKLV Royal Commission’s work at this time; it didn’t Society, Steer excavated the settlement at West VLPSO\LQÁXHQFHWKHLUVXUYH\RIWKHFRXQW\RI Plean, Stirling (Steer 1958; NS88NW 5), while Roxburgh begun in 1931, but required much all of the Commission’s archaeologists took of the county to be ‘gone over again’ (Graham part in the rescue excavations undertaken in 1950: 2). advance of the construction of the Inter Services

* RCAHMS, John Sinclair House, 16 Bernard Terrace, Edinburgh EH8 9NX 364 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013

description of the Commission in 1950, which is crucial to an understanding of their work, the paper goes on to describe the Marginal Land Survey (MLS) in some detail, looking at the progress, the results, and the setbacks, which include recognisable challenges such as foot and mouth and terrible weather, not to mention a surprising degree of partnership working and voluntary contribution. While the analysis of aerial photographs was certainly innovative, the opportunity is also taken to look at the measured drawings produced during WKHVXUYH\ LQWRWDO DQGWREULHÁ\GLVFXVV some of the evolution of interpretation and depiction in archaeological plans at RCAHMS. A section on the dissemination of the results considers the unpublished material, academic and popular publications, as well as liaison ZLWKRWKHUJRYHUQPHQWDJHQFLHVZKLOHWKHÀQDO part provides both a discussion and a critique of the project, the results of which still form an important part of the historic environment record. As mentioned, archaeology in Scotland Illus 1 Dr Kenneth Steer, archaeologist and Secretary was a very small world, and the business of the Royal Commission (1937–78), in 1964. archive of the Royal Commission provides a SC1058563 © Crown Copyright RCAHMS unique and essentially untapped opportunity WR VWXG\ LQWHUFRQQHFWLRQV UHÁHFWHG ERWK LQ ÀHOGZRUN DQG LQ LQWHUSUHWDWLRQV 3URMHFWV Guided Missile Range in the Western Isles in like this formed the springboard from which 1956 (MacLaren 1974; NF74SE 5; NF74SE meta-analyses were generated, and this too is 6; NF74SE 10). The small size of the Scottish explored to some extent, although there is not archaeological profession at this time meant that the scope here to write the fuller accounts that the work of the Commissioners and their staff are needed. PDGHXSDVLJQLÀFDQWSURSRUWLRQRIWKHQDWLRQ·V WRWDO ÀHOGZRUN 7R WDNH EXW RQH \HDU RI WKHVH Proceedings, Volume 83 (1948–9) has nine THE ROYAL COMMISSION IN 1950 articles that describe excavations and surveys undertaken by Commissioners, the Secretary For much of its history, the Royal Commission and staff; many, but not all, under the auspices was essentially a group of chosen experts of the Royal Commission’s programme. reporting directly to the monarch with respect to The purpose of this paper is to bring one its remit to ‘provide an Inventory of monuments’ large but largely unpublished rescue project pre-dating 1707 – thus the 16th report was LQWRIRFXVDQGWRH[SORUHQRWRQO\KRZLWÀWV addressed ‘to the Queen’s most excellent in with other elements of the Commission’s majesty’ (RCAHMS 1963: xxi). In order to work (illus 2 and 3), but how it contributes gather the requisite information for these to the overall national record. Starting with a reports, the Commission employed a Secretary, ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 365

Illus 2 $JHQHUDOLVHGPDSRI5&$+06ÀHOGZRUNXSWR GV005411 © Crown Copyright RCAHMS 366 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013

illus 3 $JHQHUDOLVHGPDSRI5&$+06ÀHOGZRUNDIWHU GV005412 © Crown Copyright RCAHMS ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 367 backed up by an executive staff. By 1949, the helped improve the illustrations (Mercer 1998: staff was back to its full pre-war complement of 431). Perhaps as important, he and his wife ÀYHDQGVLJQLÀFDQWLQURDGVZHUHEHLQJPDGHWR undertook a major programme of excavations catch up on the inevitable delays caused by the with the assistance of Commission staff (Piggott war (Dunbar 1992). 1950; 1951; 1952), and these were promptly The chairman of the Commission at published in contrast to the work of some this time was Francis David Charteris, Earl contemporaries (Piggott 1947: 93). Professor of Wemyss and March, an experienced Richmond too, who is particularly well known colonial administrator. Alexander Ormiston in Scotland for his excavations at the Roman Curle was joined as a Commissioner by fort of Newstead (Richmond 1952), was a key fellow archaeologists Stuart Piggott and Ian member of the archaeological establishment. Richmond; architect Reginald Fairlie, who Although based with Hawkes and Galbraith designed the National Library of Scotland; at the University of Oxford, where he was former Secretary William Mackay Mackenzie, Professor of the Archaeology of the Roman historian, archaeologist and writer; William Empire, Richmond was a Commissioner from Douglas Simpson, architect and archaeologist; 1944 until his sudden death in 1965. and Vivian Hunter Galbraith, historian. Piggott, Richmond and Childe, who was Particular Commissioners were key to the himself an active member of the Commission programme of archaeological survey. Curle, from 1942 to 1947, were all involved in the described by an obituarist as a ‘pillar of the preparation of a document entitled ‘A Survey establishment’ (Ritchie 2002) had undertaken and Policy of Field Research in the Archaeology WKH ÀUVW ÀHOGZRUN IRU WKH &RPPLVVLRQ IURP of Great Britain’, which was published by 1908 to 1913, before accepting the post as the Council for British Archaeology in 1948. Director of the National Museum of Antiquities The document was principally aimed at those of Scotland. Professor Stuart Piggott was of ‘pursuing archaeology in their spare time’ course fundamental to the development of (Hawkes & Piggott 1948: 11) and, in the British archaeology, taking over from Vere main, provided a survey of current thinking Gordon Childe in 1947, both as Abercromby and a call for the development of more Chair at the University of Edinburgh, and as a UHÀQHGFKURQRORJLHV:LWKUHIHUHQFHWR:DOHV Commissioner until 1976. Piggott’s 1947 review UHJLRQDOÀHOGVXUYH\VZHUHUHFRPPHQGHGEXW of Orkney and Shetland gives us a valuable the work of all three Commissions received insight into his view of the Commission’s work scant attention and although the Commission’s immediately before his appointment. While staff were clearly aware of it, the policy did celebrating the ‘clear diagrammatic’ plans, he QRW DIIHFW WKH DSSURDFK WR UHJLRQDO ÀHOG noted that the ‘general intelligent public’ was survey – their policy and strategy coming mainly not well-served by the lack of synthesis. He from within the organisations themselves. went to on to say that: ‘while their objective Having said that, it is important to recognise ÀHOGZRUNDQGUHFRUGLQJDUHEH\RQGSUDLVHWKH that both the 1948 policy and the Commission’s Commissioners, unfortunately, contrive to give work were driven by the thinking of certain the impression that the prehistoric antiquities individuals and were set within a culture- of Orkney and Shetland have not been dealt historical and diffusionist model, one that with by prehistorians’ (1947: 93). As one can strove to identify a chronological and regional imagine, his role was thus crucial in improving pattern of type-sites, and support it through the syntheses in successive volumes. Indeed, excavation. he wrote substantial parts of the introductory The Secretary of the Commission from text to the Roxburgh Inventory himself and 1935 until 1957 was Angus Graham, a 368 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013

IRUHVWHU DQG DXWKRU RI ÀFWLRQ DV ZHOO DV DQ that served for over 40 years: architects Pat archaeologist, whose main strengths in relation Watson and Charles Calder, and archaeologist to the Commission were described by his Kenneth Steer. Helen Mclaren also deserves obituarist as both editing and ‘his readiness to a mention as a long-serving, and presumably entertain new ideas’ (Dunbar 1981: 2). Dunbar long-suffering, secretary. To this team was went further, explaining that ‘the employment added Richard (Dick) Feachem, as a junior RIDLUSKRWRJUDSKVWKHLQWURGXFWLRQRIRIÀFLDO archaeologist, in 1947 (illus 4). four-wheel drive cars, and the creation Graham, writing in 1950, detailed the of a photographic department’ increased respective roles of the staff: ERWK WKH HIÀFLHQF\ DQG WKH DXWKRULW\ RI WKH Commission’s work. It is of particular note in To the Secretary, administration, editorial work and the putting of volumes through the press; relation to this paper that Graham successfully to Mr Watson, charge and main conduct of the argued for an increase of more than double architectural part of the programme, including in the budget during the period described the historical research connected therewith; to 1 here, between 1950 and 1960 (105/5 ). After Mr Calder, assistance with architectural work, demobilisation, the Commission had three plane-table planning, photography, drafting ¶6HQLRU ,QYHVWLJDWLQJ 2IÀFHUV· DOO VWDII of plans and preparation of illustrations for volumes; to Dr Steer, charge and main conduct of the prehistoric and Roman surveys, with the research necessary thereto; to Mr Feachem, assistance with the foregoing; and to Miss Mclaren RIÀFHPDQDJHPHQW DFFRXQWV FRUUHVSRQGHQFH and the typing of matter for publication (Graham 1950: 2).

By late 1949, the proposed programme of winter ZRUNLQFOXGHGWKHÀQDOLVDWLRQRIHGLWRULDOZRUN for the Edinburgh Inventory, the preparation of articles and introductory material for the Roxburgh Inventory DQGDVSHFLÀFUHTXHVWIRU staff to co-direct the excavation at Bonchester Hill (Piggott 1952; RCAHMS 1956). Intentions were that the survey of Selkirkshire would continue the following summer, as would Peeblesshire, much of the architectural work in these counties being already complete. ‘As funds and petrol permit’ opportunities were to be taken to visit important monuments under threat or to make ‘exceptional enquiries’, and a general review of forts was to be continued (102/3 i).

THE SURVEY OF MARGINAL LANDS Illus 4 Richard Feachem, archaeologist at the Royal Commission (1947–65), and his wife Meghan in 1956. SC1360453 © Crown Copyright In the introduction to the Edinburgh Inventory, RCAHMS the Commission explained the nature of their ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 369 work during the war years, the subject of a Conservative government policy at the time forthcoming publication by this writer: fundamentally aimed to improve the country’s ability to be self-sustaining in foodstuffs, The war brought special risks to ancient timber, and energy. Steer’s memorandum was monuments in all parts of Scotland, not only written during this period of expansion in WKURXJK HQHP\ DFWLRQ EXW WKURXJK WKH ÀHOG agriculture, and in particular during at a time training of troops, and we endeavoured to when the Marginal Agricultural Production forestall such damage by preparing emergency (MAP) Scheme, instituted in Scotland from records. Under this programme, some 2,300 photographs were taken of buildings situated in 1942, was helping farmers to bring in new land. counties not yet covered by Inventories, and 636 In the House of Commons, marginal land was monuments were visited and recorded in military debated regularly in the late 1940s and 1950s, as training areas. We have to thank Professor Childe, a number of Agricultural Bills were introduced, who was then a member of the Commission, for providing incentives to small- and medium- having done the bulk of this latter work himself sized farms to take in additional ground. While (RCAHMS 1951: xxvii). MAP provided additional help for producers in marginal areas, ‘exposing the potentialities’, It was in this context, and in the light of his the 1947 Agriculture Act established a system own work with the Monuments, Fine Arts of guaranteed prices for key commodities, and Archives section in wartime Germany, an annual review, and a series of new or that Kenneth Steer prepared a memorandum strengthened research institutes (Symon 1959: proposing an emergency survey of monuments 256; Bryden 1995)The incentive toward self- threatened with destruction, and this was taken VXIÀFLHQF\DOVREURXJKWVLJQLÀFDQWFKDQJHVLQ forward by the Secretary to a meeting of the Britain’s forestry policy, leading to growth in Commission in November 1949 (Appendix the acreage of forestry by over 1000% during 1). Steer emphasised the good preservation of the period 1949–59 (Anderson 1967: 434, monuments in marginal land and explained the 506–11). Other industries mentioned by Steer great value of stereoscopic aerial photographs, included hydro-electric power which, during which had helped the Commission’s Roxburgh the 1950s, was expanding to take in very large Inventory ‘far outrun its predecessors’ allowing areas of Highland Scotland in particular. it to be ‘much more nearly complete than any In April 1950, 7KH 7LPHV, 7KH 6FRWVPDQ other as yet produced’ (RCAHMS 1956: xxvi). and7KH*ODVJRZ+HUDOG published letters from Steer’s experience visiting Stobs training the Commission’s Chairman explaining the camp at Hawick had demonstrated that aerial importance of the project, and the rationale was photographs could assist the Ministry of also set out in detail in the introduction of the Works with development control by allowing next report, published six years later: DGGLWLRQDOIHDWXUHVWREHLGHQWLÀHG+HDUJXHG that sudden changes in policy might result Earthworks and forts, apart from those situated in the destruction and damage of numerous RQXQSURÀWDEOHKLOOWRSVDUHVXEMHFWWRFRQVWDQW monuments without an adequate response. attrition through ploughing, drainage and other forms of rural exploitation, and this process Finally, he suggested that although elements of must be expected to extend as more land is this survey could be carried out by either the made available for production of food or timber. Inspectorate of Ancient Monuments or the OS, Believing that rigorous measures should be taken it was only the Commission’s staff that were at once to record and, where appropriate, to in a position to work holistically, undertaking investigate monuments which must necessarily photographic interpretation, ground-checking be destroyed during the next few years, we DQGÀHOGVXUYH\ postponed, at the end of 1950, our normal 370 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013

programme of County Inventories in favour of MacLaren to assist him in ground-checking an emergency survey of marginal lands in all in Scotland during that decade. The principal parts of Scotland where an early expansion of resource, however, was the RAF National Air agriculture or forestry might be expected. The 6XUYH\ÁRZQEHWZHHQDQGZKLFKZDV requisite complement to this survey is a campaign designed to produce national stereoscopic cover of test excavations, but for this we have at present at a scale of 1:10,000 (illus 5). This became a neither the funds nor the personnel (RCAHMS crucial resource for prospective archaeological 1956: xxvi). survey as soon as it was available, and Steer The aerial photographs referred to by Steer in particular was familiar with the material, and used during the MLS included a collection having used it during the war while with an Air ÁRZQ E\ WKH 5R\DO $LU )RUFH LQ  DW Photograph Interpretation Unit; indeed, soon the request of the Commission’s Secretary, after the war he published a paper advocating J G Callander (eg RCAHMS 1933: Fig. 10; its use for the discovery of archaeological Collection Item F70), along with images from earthworks (Steer 1947; Dunbar & Maxwell the Cambridge University collection built 2007). up by Dr J K St Joseph, who was in regular While the study of aerial photographs and contact with RCAHMS during the 1950s (eg ground-checking was well underway in Scotland )HDFKHPE 6W-RVHSKEHQHÀWHGIURPWKH by 1955, the English Commission, ‘at the request secondment of RCAHMS archaeologist Alastair of the Ancient Monuments Board of the Ministry

Illus 5 Examining 1940s air-photos through a more modern stereoscopic viewer. © Author ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 371 of Works and various other learned bodies by J H Craw for the Berwickshire Inventory … undertook to make emergency surveys of (RCAHMS 1915: No 92), was found in 1950 to monuments of the prehistoric and early historic be ‘completely ploughed out’, while another at period threatened with destruction by recent Marygoldhill (NT86SW 4) was obscured by tree- developments in the techniques of agriculture, felling operations. Others, such as Battleknowes forestry, mining etc’ (RCHME 1963: 1; Sargent (NT85SE 5), were partly ploughed out. In 2001: 68). The staff of the English Commission certain instances, Steer reinterpreted the visible visited in the order of 1,000 sites over the next features, arguing that the remains of a palisade WZR\HDUVLQUHVSRQVHWRQRWLÀFDWLRQIURPWKH slot at Dabshead Hill (NT55SW 14) and a Monuments Inspectorate of developments in similar feature a Prestoncleugh (NT75NE 7) had mining, quarrying and gravel working. Their been misinterpreted by Craw (1921: 234), and methodology differed in that they occasionally that the huts at Haerfaulds (NT55SE 14) were omitted ground-checking, but this is simply due certainly later than the defences, a point that to the larger area that they covered. However, had been left unclear in the original Inventory the inclusion of six-digit grid references in the description (RCAHMS 1915: No 218). One limited list was a welcome innovation. major survey was undertaken in September 1950, that of the broch, fort and settlement at Edin’s Hall (NT76SE 6) (illus 6). Originally PROGRAMME AND PROGRESS proposed in October 1948, it was re-surveyed to provide a comparison with Torwoodlee, We are fortunate in having the six-monthly Selkirkshire, and was intended as an appendix reports of the Secretary on both the progress to that volume (102/3 i; 102/4 ii; Piggott 1953). of the staff and the intended programme. This Although not strictly part of the MLS, the Edin’s KHOSVÁHVKRXWWKHGHWDLORIWKHZRUNÁRZZKLOH Hall survey, discussed further below (p 378), is a also providing the context for the survey which good example from the period. was undertaken between 1950 and 1958 (illus By April 1951, the aerial coverage had been 2 and 3). The work began in earnest during the examined for Fife, Peeblesshire, Dumfriesshire, HDUO\PRQWKVRIZKHQ6WHHULGHQWLÀHG Kirkcudbrightshire and Wigtownshire, and targets for ground-checking in Berwickshire, ÀHOGZRUN KDG EHJXQ LQ WKH ÀUVW WZR FRXQWLHV all missed by both the OS and RCAHMS more During the winter, Steer completed the study than 35 years before (RCAHMS 1909; 1915; of the Berwickshire photos, and, on Stuart 102/A i). Feachem too, while searching the Piggott’s recommendation, R J C Atkinson of aerial photographs for evidence of a Roman the University of Edinburgh was engaged to road, discovered the Roman fort at Broomholm, assist with the survey of the Lothians. Atkinson Dumfriesshire (NY38SE 7), which was also surveyed and published a description of the subsequently planned in August 1950 (Feachem henge at Balfarg, which had been discovered 1950; 1951). A group of 15 sites in Berwickshire during the MLS in 1950 (Atkinson 1952; Mercer were ground-checked that same month, while 1982: 64). This form of direct collaboration pottery was recovered at Marygoldhill Plantation between the Royal Commission and the (NT86SW 3) and ‘ancient tracks’ noted on the University of Edinburgh was not unusual at this OS map were reinterpreted as the remains of period. D SUHKLVWRULF ÀHOG V\VWHP ² QRZ FODVVLÀHG DV It was agreed in early 1951 that Feachem’s a pit alignment (NT86SW 72). The condition study of the photographs of Peeblesshire would of many sites Steer encountered served to represent a ‘material instalment’ of the regular emphasise the rescue component of the project; Peeblesshire survey, hence the discovery of new the fort at Dalkslaw (NT86NW 4), planned sites and monuments on aerial photographs was 372 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013

Illus 6 The plane-table survey of Edin’s Hall, undertaken in 1950. DP148104 © Crown Copyright RCAHMS

considered part of the MLS (RCAHMS 1963: derived in part from his experience during 1951. xvi–xvii), but the descriptions and surveys By November, the progress report recorded that were published in the main report (RCAHMS a new broch, two new henge monuments and LOOXV 6WHHU·VÀHOGZRUNLQ)LIHLQFOXGHG numerous native forts and settlements had been both new and previously known sites and discovered, also noting a visit to the military KH RFFDVLRQDOO\ PDGH VSHFLÀF FRPPHQW RQ camp at Stobo (NT40NE 56), which had been scheduling, as considerations of what we might mentioned in Steer’s original memorandum. In FDOO VLJQLÀFDQFH DQG SURWHFWLRQ ZHUH DW WKH July, staff attended the conference in Dublin forefront of his mind eg the earthwork at Cash of the Prehistoric Society. During the winter, 0LOO 126:   ,Q 0D\ ÀHOGZRUN ZDV work continued on the examination of aerial extended into Dumfries and, later in the year, to photographs and on the preparation of site the counties of Wigtown and Lanark. Feachem’s descriptions. work in the latter county survives only in his 7KHÀHOGZRUNLQWKHVXPPHURIZDV notebooks and some plans, as the prehistoric hindered by an outbreak of foot and mouth monuments were all revisited after 1969, and disease and poor weather, but the Secretary the majority were resurveyed. His proposal felt able to say that the counties of Berwick and that the Commission produce an Inventory )LIH ZHUH ÀQLVKHG   )XUWKHU HYLGHQFH on the prehistoric and Roman monuments of for the threat to monuments was found at Lanarkshire was accepted by the Commission Park Wood, Ayrshire (NS42NE 1), where an in November 1963 (102 ii), and it was surely enclosure was being cleared of trees in advance ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 373 of cultivation (TS: 701). The Commission’s the list of monuments deemed most worthy of RIÀFHUV XQGHUWRRN D VPDOO UHVFXH H[FDYDWLRQ preservation’ (TS: 20). establishing that the site was domestic rather By the end of 1953, it was possible to fully than defensive. This sense of exigency helps assess the project’s impact and Steer prepared a explain the short notes added to sites such as detailed report for the Commission’s November Carwinning Hill (NS25SE 6), which was later meeting (103/6). Original estimates of time subject to a rescue excavation (Cowie 1977; were now considered ‘totally inadequate’, and 1978), as well as The Knock (NS26SW 2), an it was felt that two to three years would be LPSUHVVLYHYLWULÀHGIRUWLQ$\UVKLUHZKHUH6WHHU needed to complete the programme as originally wrote simply that ‘a plan should eventually be envisaged, and that ‘if the scheme is to be carried made, but there is no urgency’ (TS: 38). The to its logical conclusion’, a further three to four new discovery of an Antonine fortlet at Lurg years must be allowed for ‘investigation of the 0RRU 166( ZDVFRQÀUPHGLQ1RYHPEHU east coast plain from Fife to the Moray Firth’ 1952. (102/4 i). Steer explained that progress had During the winter of 1952–3 the study of been affected by the fact that the comprehensive the aerial coverage was completed south of the survey of Stirlingshire, ie a survey that combined Forth–Clyde isthmus, and both Stirlingshire WKH JURXQGWUXWKLQJ RI VLWHV LGHQWLÀHG IURP and Fife had also been included. A proposal to aerial photographs with the remainder, had not employ two students to assist Steer and Feachem been foreseen, and that the team had used the ‘to permit them to operate as two separate same comprehensive approach in Peebleshire. parties’ was accepted by the Commission, Furthermore, they had chosen to review a high though it is clear that Feachem teamed up with number of ‘known’ sites, either ‘because the his wife, and that her expenses were paid by the sites in question were rapidly deteriorating or Commission. Calder, not perhaps involved in were threatened with mutilation or destruction; WKHÀHOGZRUNE\WKLVVWDJHKDGDOVREHJXQWKH or because existing plans were inaccurate or inking of the survey drawings and about 40 had misleading; or, in a few instances, because the been completed. remains were of special interest and had not been During the following summer, numerous surveyed in the past’. He went on to say that ‘by monuments in Ayrshire were recorded, with a relatively small additional expenditure of time targets taken from aerial photographs, OS maps and effort it has been possible in this way to and a wide range of other publications. Smith’s complete or bring up to date the existing corpus Prehistoric Man in Ayrshire provided Steer of plans of major earthworks in Ayr, Berwick, with a list of forts to check, and he discounted Fife and Kirkcudbright, and it is recommended nine (TS: 18) Fieldwork included the survey that this policy should be continued in Renfrew’. of a possible henge at Lindston (NS31NE 6), Finally, bad weather and a lack of suitable a supposed ‘Roman camp’ at Gormyre Hill student assistants were also cited as problems. (NS97SE 5) and the survey of the small fort Major discoveries listed included at least one at Craigie Hill (NS43SW 4), which was then KHQJH WZR EURFKV WKUHH 5RPDQ IRUWV ÀYH being quarried away and is now completely palisaded settlements, several homestead destroyed. A mistake was made at Stevenston moats and some mottes. An appendix to the /RFK 166( ZKHUHWKHUHPDLQVLGHQWLÀHG report, by Atkinson, noted that he was unable as an earthwork (TS: 55) were described in 1965 to complete the survey of the Lothians due to as a plantation enclosure. At Crammag Head other commitments (103/6). Steer recommended (NX03SE 1), Steer noted that a ‘lighthouse that any decision on policy with regard to the and its appurtenances have been built … in coastal belt north of Fife should be delayed spite of the fact that the fort was included in until 1955. Altogether, the work completed by 374 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013

1953 included the discovery of 248 new sites, were discovered just in Midlothian (TS: 17). of which 175 had been visited and 57 planned. In an important reanalysis, the subtle remains In addition, 44 previously known sites had also of an earlier denuded fort were recovered from been planned. within Kidlaw, East Lothian (NT56SW 1) (illus During the summer of 1954, Renfrewshire 7), although it was the relationship with the later and the Lothians were nearing completion, ‘homesteads’ that was emphasised. Steer saw though the tying up of loose ends extended into these as ‘of a familiar type, seen throughout 1956, while survey continued in Lanarkshire, SE Scotland and Northumbria between the 2nd despite ‘exceptionally bad weather’. Such and 7th centuries ad’. It followed then that ‘not weather caused even more problems than it only the second fort at Kidlaw, but also the other would today, since the drawings were prepared circular, multivallate forts of this class, which are on paper that could not withstand a serious so widely distributed throughout Berwickshire wetting. Despite such drawbacks, major sites and the Lothians, but which do not appear in the in the county of Kinross were completely adjacent counties of Roxburgh and Selkirk, are re-described in 1954. Thus, at Benarty Hill to be assigned to the Early Iron Age’ (TS: 28). (NT19NW 7), it was recognised that much After another winter of research, writing up more of the fort survived, while at and aerial photograph interpretation, the survey of Dummiefarlane (NT09NE 1), a record was the fort at Duncarnock, Renfrewshire (NS55SW written as a ‘substitute’ for that in the Inventory. 3), was undertaken by Feachem in March 7KHÀUVWIRUD\ZDVPDGHLQWR,QYHUQHVVVKLUH 1955. This was followed by the investigation where a motte at Tomnacross was recorded of Traprain Law, East Lothian (NT57SE 1), (NH54SW 7). an ambitious survey involving four staff and a A fort at Walls Hill, Renfrewshire (NS45NW volunteer (see below; Feachem 1958a). Work 1), was also discovered in 1954, and this was continued in West Lothian, and in Wigtown, investigated with a trench by Frank Newall in the latter including Ardwell Broch (NX04SE the following years (Newall 1960). Newall was 1), where the staff undertook some clearance to a regular correspondent with the Commission expose the wall faces, and the Fell of Barhulion through the 1950s, and a large numbers of (NX34SE 15), where a chevauz de frise was letters between him and the archaeologists discovered and planned (illus 8). Wigtown survive in MacLaren’s uncatalogued archive proved to be one of the main foci of the MLS; at material.2 Another fort, at Barr Hill, Kilbarchan Core Hill (NX13NW 6), the condition of the fort (NS46SW 2), was found to be completely had seriously deteriorated, but further success quarried away. Other structures in Renfrewshire came with the discovery of a third fort at Burrow that were depicted on the 1st edition of the OS Head (NX43SE 3) and others at Portobello Head 6-inch map were investigated but rejected – (NW96NE 9) and Dove Cave (NX04NE 13). The eg Castlehead and Dykebar Hill – although in earthworks at the Mull of Galloway (NX13SW both cases later excavations revealed some 17) were surveyed, with Steer concluding that FRQÀUPDWRU\ HYLGHQFH 7DOERW  /RQLH  ‘I very much doubt whether either of these so- Newall 1968). Work in the Lothians included called entrenchments is defensive or of any great the discovery of a new fort at Dechmont Law, antiquity’, inconclusive comments that have not West Lothian (NT06NW 6), and a re-analysis been completely resolved by more recent surveys of the settlements at Watherston, Midlothian (RCAHMS 1985; Strachan 2000). Fieldwork was (NT44NW 8), and Park Burn, East Lothian also undertaken in Caithness and Dumfriesshire, (NT56NE 6). Despite the fact that it was felt that DQGRQHRIWKHPRVWVLJQLÀFDQWGLVFRYHULHVFDPH the vertical aerial photographs did not register during the re-survey of the palisaded settlement FURS PDUNV ZLWK UHJXODULW\ VL[ RI VLJQLÀFDQFH at Morton Mains Hill (NS80SE 7; TS: 23), which ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 375

LGHQWLÀHGWKHUHPDLQVRIWZRSDOLVDGHWUHQFKHV Hill (NJ56SE 4), Banffshire, and others in DQGDQXQÀQLVKHGUDPSDUWQRWLQJWKH¶VWULNLQJ Aberdeenshire and Inverness-shire. Durn Hill similarities’ with Hayhope Knowe – a crucial ZDV GHVFULEHG DV XQÀQLVKHG EHFDXVH RI WKH site in Roxburghshire that had been surveyed presence of both a large number of gaps in by the Commission in 1946, and excavated in what he perceived to be marker trenches as well 1947 and 1949 (NT81NE 18; Piggott 1951; DVVHFWLRQVRIXQÀQLVKHGGLWFK6RPH\HDUVODWHU RCAHMS 1956). In fact, Margaret Piggott’s KHSURGXFHGDQDQDO\VLVRIXQÀQLVKHGKLOOIRUWV publication on Hayhope included an appendix by in Britain, including Durn Hill (Feachem 1971). .HQQHWK6WHHURQWKHLGHQWLÀFDWLRQRISDOLVDGHG Although the staff were regularly identifying enclosures from surface indications, intended ERWK SDOLVDGHG VHWWOHPHQWV DQG XQÀQLVKHG KLOO WR ¶KHOS ÀHOGZRUNHUV HOVHZKHUH WR UHFRJQLVH forts during the 1950s, it is not always certain similar structures before they are destroyed by that they made the correct call. More recently, ploughing or afforestation’ (Piggott 1951: 64). staff have reinterpreted Feachem’s marker In 1956, Feachem moved farther north, trenches as the evidence of a palisade not only preparing detailed descriptions of the sites at Durn Hill and Little Conval, but also at Hill at Little Conval (NJ23NE 1) and Durn of Christ’s Kirk, Aberdeenshire (NJ62NW 21).

Illus 7 An oblique aerial view of Kidlaw – the earlier defence can be seen crossing the interior. DP049756 © Crown Copyright RCAHMS 376 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013

:KLOHH[DPSOHVRIXQÀQLVKHGGHIHQFHVFHUWDLQO\ large programme orchestrated by Roy Ritchie exist, they may not occur in the numbers of the Ministry of Works, Steer, Feachem and originally proposed, and they certainly cannot MacLaren all excavated in South Uist that be readily ascribed to abandonment resulting summer. from the Roman incursion (RCAHMS 1997: MacLaren had volunteered for the 140; RCAHMS 2007: 103). Commission from at least 1953 (Steer 1953: 15) Still in 1956, further work was undertaken and he had also supervised rescue excavation LQ 0LGORWKLDQ DQG .LQFDUGLQH DQG WKH ÀUVW for the Ministry of Works in advance of the ÀHOGZRUN EHJXQ LQ 3HUWKVKLUH $W %DUU\ +LOO Dounreay Atomic Station in 1955 (Cruden (NO25SE 23) it is surprising to see that the 1955: 34). In 1956 he was employed as a junior description (TS: 45) simply notes additions archaeologist and in both 1956 and 1957 he that should be made to Christison’s plan (1900: was seconded to work with St Joseph in order Fig. 46). This had been prepared some 60 years to ground-truth his aerial discoveries – work earlier and additions are a tacit recognition of that was closely aligned with the MLS (102/1). ERWK WKH HIÀFDF\ RI &KULVWLVRQ·V ZRUN DQG RI Following Steer’s promotion to Secretary in the large resource necessary to re-survey the 1958, it was mainly Feachem who undertook site, eventually undertaken over three days in ÀHOGZRUNWKDW\HDUFRQWLQXLQJWRUHFRUGDIHZ 1988 (RCAHMS 1990: 27). The year of 1956 sites in Ross and Cromarty – including a very also witnessed a major phase of excavation in detailed description of Cnoc an Duin (NH67NE the Hebrides, in advance of the construction 1), one of a few convincing examples of an of the Guided Missile Range. As part of a XQÀQLVKHGIRUW7KHVXUYH\LQ3HUWKVKLUH

Illus 8 The unpublished drawing of the Fell of Barhulion, based on the survey undertaken in 1955. DP151592 © Crown Copyright RCAHMS ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 377 following on from Steer’s reconnaissance MEASURED SURVEYS in 1957, included the recording of two duns at Aldclune (NN86SE 1) in May 1958, both While Hogg felt able to say that ‘a really of which were later excavated in advance of careful and accurate survey can be almost as quarrying (Hingley et al 1997). Correspondence informative as an excavation’ (Hogg 1975: 24), between Feachem and Margaret Stewart one could argue that in many cases it can actually survives in MacLaren’s archive, suggesting that exceed the value of small-scale excavation, they collaborated in advance of her publication with the key proviso that surveys cannot of a study of Perthshire ring forts (Stewart recover material for absolute dating. Survey 1969).2 and illustration was therefore a key part of the Between October 1957 and April 1958, Commission’s approach, both during the MLS, the progress report notes how ‘Mr Feachem and in their work in general. Between 1914 and discovered a Roman fort at Dupplin, Perthshire 1960, the great majority of the Commission’s [NO01NW 4], and, together with Mr MacLaren, survey and illustration was undertaken by has planned a number of the monuments of Charles Calder, an architect by training. Despite that county which were discovered on air- his focus on architecture and survey, Calder photographs in the course of the Commission’s is best known for his excavations of Neolithic survey of marginal land. Substantial progress sites in Shetland, which were funded by this has been made in typing the articles dealing society and undertaken in time off granted by with marginal land discoveries, but it has the Commission (Calder 1958: 379). For most not yet been possible to draw out any of the RIKLVWHQXUHÀHOGGUDZLQJVZHUHSUHSDUHGDV numerous plans made during the course of the either measured sketches or plane-table surveys survey’ (102 i). – the methodology and scale being chosen to The site at Dupplin was apparently ‘sectioned suit the size and complexity of the monument. E\ 5 : )HDFKHP LQ  WKRXJK VLJQLÀFDQW +LVSODQVFDQEHLGHQWLÀHGLQWKH&RPPLVVLRQ·V doubt has been cast over its true character in publications between the 1920s (eg 1924: 9) recent years’ (Wooliscroft et al 2002). and 1963, not only by the occasional use of References to the MLS in programme his initials but also by his distinctive north and progress reports come to an end in 1958 arrow and hachure style. During each winter, and only one later visit in 1959, to the fort at ink drawings were traced from the originals Kippenross (NS79NE 17), must be ascribed using a light-box and a dip-pen. In advance to the project. During the following winter of publication, these would be checked by of 1959 to 1960, Calder continued to work colleagues who were responsible for the text, on the inking of plans, but the completion of the Secretary and Commissioners. Commission this task was cut short by his retirement volumes during the period of study were printed in April of 1960, by which time he had E\ +HU 0DMHVW\·V 6WDWLRQHU\ 2IÀFH %HIRUH prepared 82. Fieldwork in 1959 and 1960 1975, they used the letterpress printing process continued to include elements of survey in onto high-quality paper, which produced a areas outwith the Inventory programme, but rich black in illustrations and photographs, this was no longer driven by the study of but required the latter to be held separately at aerial photographs. Fieldwork in Perthshire the rear of the book. After 1975, the volumes in 1960 was thus regarded as ‘miscellaneous were printed using offset litho, which allowed DFWLYLWLHV· ZKLOH WKH UHVXOWV RI RWKHU ÀHOGWULSV photos to be intermixed with text but, some made in response to new discoveries or to would argue, reduced the quality of the overall threat have since been catalogued with the MLS effect. For a drawing to reach publication in material. letterpress, it would have to be photographically 378 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013

Illus 9 The publication drawing of Dunnideer, based on the survey undertaken in 1957. DP149857 © Crown Copyright RCAHMS

reduced, engraved onto a block and then set into helped them to interpret complex remains such a composition with the text, a very lengthy and as those at Edin’s Hall broch and settlement. skilled process. Neither the survey scale nor the That survey included plans and sections of reduction during printing was standardised, so both the broch and the fort, all of which were that prior to Peeblesshire (1967), the published prepared as drafts in ink (illus 6). As Dunwell drawings were produced at a variety of scales. (1999: 308) pointed out, it ‘omits several Hence, a single page might contain plans of features not considered at the time to be directly comparable structures at different scales (eg related to the occupation of the site’, but it also RCAHMS 1956: 137). QRWHGRWKHUVIRUWKHÀUVWWLPH 'XQZHOO As one might expect, both individual staff 312). such as Calder and the organisation as a whole $VWKHPDUJLQDOODQGVXUYH\ZDVDVLJQLÀFDQW accumulated knowledge and experience over departure from the Inventory programme, with time, with the result that the staff of 1950 felt a focus on rapidity as opposed to the creation that ‘many of the descriptions given in earlier of an authoritative record, it might be expected Inventories are wide of the mark’ (MS 1033/73, that the methodology would have altered, 95), a comment that clearly extended to some but surveys appear to have been undertaken surveys as well. By this time, a partnership such in essentially the same way. Although it is as that enjoyed by Steer and Calder had about GLIÀFXOW WR GHFLSKHU WKH FOXHV WKH ÀUVW 0/6 40 years of shared experience, which must have surveys were seemingly undertaken by the staff ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 379 working in pairs, often the two archaeologists 9). $ FRQVLGHUDEO\ PRUH GLIÀFXOW VXUYH\ KDG taking turns, or one working with Calder while been undertaken two years earlier, at the fort the other undertook reconnaissance. Later, the on Traprain Law, East Lothian. This required voluntary contribution of MacLaren, and of all three archaeologists and the help of both Kathleen Meghan Feachem, Richard’s wife, Commission architect Geoffrey Hay and must have made a huge difference. Of the Meghan Feachem. Using a network of 120 many surveys that the Feachem’s undertook triangulated control points, 24 divorced surveys as part of this project, their 1957 plan of the were undertaken at 1mm: 1ft (Feachem 1958a). IRUWDW'XQQLGHHULVDJRRGH[DPSOH7KHÀHOG The plan (illus 10) was published in 1958, 1966 drawing was surveyed at 1mm: 1ft, Feachem’s and again in 1976 (Feachem 1966: 79; Jobey usual working scale, and subsequently inked 1976). Incidentally, Feachem preferred the use by Calder for publication at only 20% of its of this standard scale, which is equivalent to original size (1966: 69). The depiction relies about 1:300, in part because it is appropriate on a combination of colour, symbology and for many of the sites he encountered, but also annotation to convey information. Thus, the because it could be achieved with a simple well, fence and quarry are annotated, the conversion from imperial tape to metric rule YLWULÀHGZDOODQGPHGLHYDOFDVWOHDUHFRORXUHG (Ian Scott pers comm). while man-made slopes are distinguished from Many more MLS surveys were inked by those that are interpreted as natural simply Charles Calder during the last of his 46 years by the closer spacing of the hachures (illus with RCAHMS in 1959–60 (102/1), bringing the

Illus 10 The publication drawing of Traprain Law, based on the survey undertaken in 1955. DP153238 © Crown Copyright RCAHMS 380 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013 total he prepared to 82. New ink versions of 16 Kirkcudbright (NX65NE 11). Inked versions of of the surveys were produced by Feachem after a further 30 surveys were created some 15 years Calder retired, presumably with the intention later, in 1974–5, either as part of the training of publication in a proposed but ultimately of draughtsman such as John Stevenson, or for uncompleted Commission volume of hillforts publication (eg RCAHMS 1978). For example, (102/1), or in his 1963 *XLGH WR 3UHKLVWRULF the plan of the broch at Craig Hill, Angus Scotland (see below)Thus, a small number of (NO43NW 22; illus 11), discovered and partially sites have multiple versions based on a single excavated by Commission staff in 1957 (Steer original survey, eg Queen’s Hill moated site, 1957), was inked in 1974 but understandably

Illus 11 The unpublished drawing of Craig Hill, based on the survey undertaken in 1957. DP147379 © Crown Copyright RCAHMS ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 381

Illus 12 The publication drawing of Dunnideer, based on the re-survey undertaken in 1996. Extract from GV000239 © Crown Copyright RCAHMS

missed in a recent review of the site (Mackie Scott and architect Geoffrey Hay. Scott, whose 2007: 1036). Other sites, particularly those focus was on the illustration of archaeological visited or surveyed during forays into Kintyre material, dramatically improved the quality of in 1955 and 1956, were revisited or resurveyed recording of carved stones and archaeological in later years as ideas and expectations of both sites by introducing skills learnt, in part, at the interpretation and depiction. One example is Edinburgh College of Art. These innovations the fort at Ranachan Hill (NR62NE 12) which LQFOXGHG WKH FUHDWLRQ RI D PRUH UHÀQHG was visited by Steer in 1955 and subsequently symbology, common scales (see RCAHMS VXUYH\HGLQ7KHÀQDOSXEOLVKHGDFFRXQW 1967: xxxv), and a consistent reduction to actually relies on surveys undertaken in 1965 40% for publication – a process that leads to a and 1968 (RCAHMS 1971: 74–5). ‘tightening’ of the depiction. The biggest changes to the Commission’s Nowadays, our staff have access to both survey and illustration came at the end of modern and traditional survey equipment Calder’s career, but perhaps more as a response and tend to use a combination of sources and to some criticism of the publications, particularly techniques to produce the desired results in relation to synthesis (as noted above p 367) (English Heritage 2002; RCAHMS 2011). and photography – reviews of the Edinburgh Dunnideer is among many sites that have Inventory published in the 7LPHV /LWHUDU\ been resurveyed by the Royal Commission Supplement (McLaren 1952) and the journal of during subsequent projects. It was re-planned the Royal Institute of British Architects (in April at the smaller scale of 1:500 as part of the 1952) single out the latter (103/5). The situation Strathdon project (RCAHMS 2007: Fig. 6.25) was markedly improved with the employment DQGWKHVXUYH\UHSURGXFHGKHUHLVDVLJQLÀFDQW of a professional photographer, Geoffrey improvement both in terms of interpretation and Quick, and two highly skilled illustrators: Ian depiction (illus 9 and 12). 382 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013

DISSEMINATION AND PUBLICATION however, since it took up to 20 years in some instances, and the remaining 50% were Surviving archival material from the MLS recommended but never accepted. FRPSULVHV WKH ÀHOG QRWHERRNV RI 6WHHU DQG More detailed results from the project were Feachem, the survey and ink drawings, the published at the time, including a regional unpublished descriptions, and the administrative report (Feachem 1956), a detailed description material. The descriptions are very varied; some of Traprain Law (1958a), and wider analysis of are just notes on condition, a fuller description Scottish hill-forts (Feachem 1966; 1971), while awaiting an Inventory survey, while others, elements of the Stirling and Peebles Inventories in areas already covered or where an earlier were derived directly from the analysis of description was incomplete, were treated in aerial photographs (RCAHMS 1963; 1967). great detail in a recognisable Inventory style In addition, Wainwright’s 7KH3UREOHPRIWKH NQRZQLQWKHRIÀFHDV¶&RPPLVVLRQHVH·1RQH Picts (1955) included a chapter by Feachem on however, have gone through the strict process IRUWLÀFDWLRQVSRWHQWLDOO\RI3LFWLVKGDWHZKLFK of editing that applies to the Commission’s though presented as ‘conjectural’, put forward SXEOLFDWLRQV WKH\ LQVWHDG UHÁHFW WKH RULJLQDO notable examples of ring-forts, citadel forts notes of individual staff. (such as Moncrieffe Hill, Perthshire, NO11NW The surveys and manuscripts were shared 23), duns and ‘long duns’ (such as Denork quickly with colleagues in the OS Archaeology Craig, Fife, NO41SE 5), many of which were 'LYLVLRQ DQG WKHLU RIÀFH UHFRUGHUV RIWHQ surveyed in 1952–3 as part of the marginal land referenced the material in their summary project. The closing paragraph is interesting in descriptions that are now available on Canmore the context of the eventual scope of the survey (eg NX19SE 2). In keeping with the Royal north of the Forth–Clyde; Warrant’s instruction that the Commission must ‘specify those monuments that seem It will be clear from the foregoing that until a most worthy of preservation’ (eg RCAHMS wide survey of all monuments which remain 1963: xix), their staff were also in regular between the Moray Firth and the Firth of Forth contact with the Ministry of Works. Though a has been completed, no attempt to prepare a basis recommendation for scheduling was supplied for identifying and studying such structures as through correspondence in unusual cases (eg PD\UHSUHVHQWWKHIRUWLÀFDWLRQVRIWKH3LFWVFDQ claim to be more than exploratory. When such Caisteal Grugaig in 1949), Commissioners a survey has been completed, it will be possible included a list of sites recommended for to select sites for a programme of excavation, scheduling in each County Inventory until 1992. and so at last to bring about the conditions in Following a meeting on 4 November which some positive knowledge may be obtained 1955, the Commissioners therefore decided to (Feachem 1955: 86). publish a list at the start of the Selkirkshire and Stirlingshire Inventories, noting discoveries in Feachem’s popular *XLGH WR 3UHKLVWRULF 1951–5 and 1956–8 respectively (RCAHMS Scotland was published in 1963It was inspired 1957: xiv–xviii; 1963: xxv). Altogether, the by the English equivalent (Thomas 1960), and lists noted 304 new monuments, including much of the content was drawn from material 100 recorded from cropmarks, and 93 were gathered for the Commission with the help of recommended for protection through the Meghan, to whom it was dedicated. Feachem Schedule. It is a measure of the success of the seems not to have discussed the book with his project that over 50% of those sites listed as colleagues; and MacLaren recalled his surprise worthy of preservation have been scheduled. when he produced a new copy at breakfast This cannot have been as a direct consequence, LQ *LJKD GXULQJ ÀHOGZRUN IRU WKH .LQW\UH ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 383

Inventory (Stratford Halliday pers comm). WKH EDVLV RI WKLV ÀHOGZRUN WKH SURVHFXWLRQ RI The roots of this secrecy, perhaps borne of VHOHFWLYH H[FDYDWLRQV RQ VLJQLÀFDQW VLWHV KDV frustration, might lie a few years earlier when taken the matter a further stage’ (Piggott 1966: Feachem’s suggestion that the Commission 2–3). produce a ‘special volume, devoted exclusively Though clearly referring in practice to Roxburgh, to Scottish hill-forts … embodying all the work here Piggott highlights both the importance done … in the course of the marginal land RI ÀHOG VXUYH\ DQG WKH LQFUHDVH LQ NQRZOHGJH survey’ was accepted by Commissioners, but gained from the use of innovative techniques. never completed (102/1). In 1965 he moved to This is not the place to review or critique the the OS, and was replaced by Graham Ritchie OLQNEHWZHHQWKHÀHOGZRUNRIWKH&RPPLVVLRQ (102/1 i). The Commission further discussed and the regional analyses of Piggott, an analysis the possibility of publishing the results of the described in a recent synthesis of the Iron Age as emergency surveys, ‘and it was agreed that a ‘remarkably resilient’ (Harding 2004: 6), but the periodic report should be issued along the lines passage provides an indication of the importance of the monograph 0RQXPHQWV7KUHDWHQHGDQG WKDW3LJJRWWODLGRQWKH&RPPLVVLRQ·VÀHOGZRUN Destroyed produced by the English Commission programme. in 1963’ (102 ii). However, nothing seems to have come of this. A few years before, in October 1961, DISCUSSION AND CONCLUDING Feachem had presented a national analysis REMARKS of Iron Age sites at the Council for British Archaeology’s Conference on Problems of the 'HÀQHG KHUH DV D SURJUDPPH RI DQDO\VLV ,URQ$JHLQ1RUWKHUQ%ULWDLQ held in Edinburgh. of aerial photographs, followed by ground- This analysis drew on his experience to present checking, the MLS was completed in 1958, by a geographical analysis of monument types that which time well over 670 monuments had been was vitally important to Stuart Piggott’s paper recorded and over 190 plans surveyed. This in the same volume, which proposed a new large body of work, the product of the efforts scheme for Scotland’s Iron Age: of archaeologists Steer and Feachem, was … in the north we have to place our reliance comparable in its scale to many of the Inventory WR D IDU JUHDWHU H[WHQW RQ WKH ÀHOG PRQXPHQWV programmes of the time and can be considered of earth and stone, unsupported by collateral DV VLJQLÀFDQW D FRQWULEXWLRQ WR WKH UHFRUG RI ceramic evidence. It follows from this that one ÀHOGDUFKDHRORJ\LQ6FRWODQG7KHFRPSOHWLRQ RI WKH PRVW VLJQLÀFDQW FRQWULEXWLRQV WR RXU of a recent project to catalogue and digitise knowledge of the Scottish Iron Age, especially material from the MLS, driven simply by a for the Lowlands, has been that of Royal wish to raise awareness and to improve access, Commission on Ancient Monuments over the has provided an opportunity to further our SDVW ÀIWHHQ \HDUV 7KH QHZ DSSURDFK WR ÀHOG understanding of the Commission’s working monuments involving air-photography on practices in the 1950s. This understanding is the one hand, and on the other the structural crucial both to help place the work of Scotland’s analysis of complex monuments on the ground, principal archaeological survey in context and disentangling their chronological components by a process analogous to the investigation of the to understand and critique the data available to architectural phases of an ancient building, has those of us that practice today and use heritage revolutionised our knowledge and understanding records. Canmore, and the RCAHMS collection of that area of Scotland where contacts with the XQGHUSLQQLQJ LW DUH XQLTXHO\ VLJQLÀFDQW rest of Britain are most likely to exist. And on national assets, but these can only be used to 384 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013 their full potential if it is understood how, why ,WLVGLIÀFXOWWREHFRPSOHWHO\FOHDUDERXWWKH and when the material was created. number of sites that were visited and recorded In terms of innovation, the use of aerial during the project because: SKRWRJUDSK\IRUWKHLGHQWLÀFDWLRQRIHDUWKZRUNV and cropmarks was pioneering and, while they 1 an unknown number of sites that were in regular communication with St Joseph, were targeted from aerial photographs Steer and the Commission were keen to employ presumably proved to be natural or it for their national survey as soon as practicable. modern in origin; The willingness of the Commissioners to delay 2 the analysis of the aerial photographs the Inventory programme in preference to what of Peeblesshire and Stirling-shire was was essentially a rescue project resulting from absorbed in those inventories; *RYHUQPHQWSROLF\LVDUHÁHFWLRQRIWKHLUVWDWXV 3 the material from Argyllshire and as independent advisors. Lanarkshire was absorbed into sub- While the Inventory programme at its sequent projects; best produced text that was accurate and 4 of the continuation of special surveys concise, illustrations that were informative in response to risk or discovery, often and aesthetically pleasing, and photographs catalogued along with the project that were clear and beautiful (Rivet 1967), the material. survey of marginal land was undertaken with a quite different remit. It was informed by a Having said that, the unpublished typescript need for brevity and by a clear understanding volumes contain only 615 descriptions and on Steer’s part that the remainder of the country it seems likely that the total number of sites would be covered by the Inventory programme visited was well above this. Of that total, 304 in due course. Some of the material was thus not monuments were reported as new discoveries completed to an Inventory standard and what and while the majority of these were new, some we have now varies from the briefest of notes to were claimed by St Joseph during the same detailed and thorough topographic descriptions period, others still had been noted by different of complex monuments. authorities, whether in unpublished reports, or The project provided an opportunity for the in publications that were outwith the scope of staff to gain wider experience of monuments the literature review. throughout much of Scotland, a broadening of The great majority of the sites were knowledge that helped them to contextualise visited in later years by the OS Archaeology the surveys of the individual counties. Division, and the small scale surveys and Furthermore, it laid the foundations for the reference data they created (whether desk- programmes that followed. Thus, the decision EDVHG DVVHVVPHQWV RU ÀHOG YLVLWV  IRUP WKH to produce /DQDUNVKLUH UHÁHFWV ERWK WKH backbone of the Scottish historic environment ÀHOGZRUNXQGHUWDNHQIRUWKLVVXUYH\LQ records, including Canmore. Many sites were as well as a search for unenclosed platform also revisited during the Society of Antiquaries settlements (Feachem 1963b), while the of Scotland Field Survey (often referred to as decision to undertake the survey of Argyllshire, the ‘Lists’), undertaken in partnership with the made in 1968 after a lengthy discussion Royal Commission (Proudfoot 1983; illus 3), which considered both Inverness-shire and or during large-area projects in later years (eg Aberdeenshire, was certainly informed by RCAHMS 1990; 1994; 1997; 2007). Since the ÀHOGZRUN LQ .LQW\UH LQ  DQG IXUWKHU OS programme and the Lists were designed to forays in the early 1960s and preceded by the be rapid and succinct, it is only the syntheses unpublished Emergency Survey of 1942. and investigation undertaken in more recent ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 385 projects that has exceeded the details provided such as Traprain Law, and continued to include LQWKHVIRUDVLJQLÀFDQWQXPEHURIVLWHV HJ these in their work. Indeed, Edwina Proudfoot’s RCAHMS 1997; 2007). Indeed, it is testament 1961 photograph of Scott and MacLaren at to the individuals involved that the 1950s record the Dunion actually captures the smoke from is still, in the great majority of cases, the most blasting in the quarry as a background (illus 13)! detailed and authoritative available. Less than Speedy communication with both the Ordnance 5% of a sample of 220 sites has been subject to Survey and the Ministry of Works does seem to further and more detailed investigations. Where have often provided a catalyst for protection, this has taken place, it has inevitably led to a whether through Scheduling or simply raised greater understanding of the chronology and awareness, although the links here are not development of a site, particularly when it has necessarily well documented. involved large-scale or long-term excavation, While partnerships were common between such as Auldhill, Portencross (Caldwell et al the Commission and this Society, the CBA 1998), or Aldclune (Hingley et al 1997). and the University of Edinburgh, not to Nevertheless, it is a measure of the success of mention individuals like Newall and Stewart, the project that so many sites survive. While it is integrated work programmes with fellow undoubtedly true that the Commission included government agencies were not – although the some that were not under threat, for the reasons Hebrides Rocket Range project of 1956–7 outlined in Steer’s 1953 summary, they also provides a notable exception. There was regular regularly encountered sites that had been recently communication, but the letters and minutes destroyed or were genuinely under direct threat, can occasionally seem almost competitive

Illus 13 Ian Scott (left) and Alastair MacLaren surveying at the Dunion in 1961. SC1098663© Crown Copyright RCAHMS 386 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013 in nature, as there was apparently a lack of thousands of monuments whose remains, clarity with regard to roles and responsibilities though frequently defaced by former between the OS, the Ministry of Works and the cultivation, are still visible on the surface. Royal Commission. It is also apparent that the 2. The Commission’s use of stereoscopic objectives of a small Royal Commission were air-photographs to quarter the ground considered peripheral to the major programmes in Roxburghshire and Selkirkshire has of agricultural expansion and afforestation. shown that less than two-thirds of the While the opportunity to use the material visible monuments in these counties to illustrate Feachem’s *XLGH WR Prehistoric have been previously recorded on the Scotland was perhaps inevitably missed, this OS maps or in archaeological literature, failure is far outweighed by the many smaller and that the hitherto undiscovered sites publications produced by Steer and Feachem, include many of outstanding importance ERWK RI ZKRP PDGH D VLJQLÀFDQW FRQWULEXWLRQ (eg a completely new class of palisade- to Scottish archaeology (Dunbar & Maxwell structures; the impressive and complex 2007; Ritchie 2005). It is also mitigated by the ,URQ $JH IRUWLÀFDWLRQ RQ 6KDZ &UDLJV effect that the body of material had on Piggott’s one Roman fort and two marching national synthesis. Even placed in a modern camps; a Romano-British settlement with context, the marginal land survey is a useful, LWVDVVRFLDWHGÀHOGV\VWHPDQGDYDULHW\ thorough and detailed body of work prepared of homesteads of primitive type). It is by increasingly experienced staff to consistent reasonable to assume that this proportion standards. The information, now readily of unrecorded to recorded monuments available through web services more than holds good for the other Scottish counties half a century after it was created, continues including those already surveyed by the to support the work of colleagues interested Commission. For technical reasons the in Scotland’s landscapes – whether for the stereoscopic photos do not normally purposes of protection, planning, research, or register crop- or soil-markings but community engagement. It is vital that we read important exceptions have been noted (eg the texts and drawings carefully, so that we can a new Roman fort in Renfrewshire, and build upon the work of the past, and recognise half-a-dozen miscellaneous earthworks in both the mistakes and the successes. Roxburgh and Selkirk). 3. Today the amount of rough grazing APPENDIX 1 land is being progressively reduced by afforestation, hydro-electric and other STEER’S MEMORANDUM TO COMMISSIONERS, development schemes, increased Service NOVEMBER 1949 requirements, and conversion to arable. 1. Owing to the fact that the land has In terms of acres, the current annual loss always been predominantly pastoral, the WKURXJK WKHVH DJHQFLHV LV LQVLJQLÀFDQW prehistoric and early historic monuments EXW LQÁXHQWLDO $JULFXOWXUDO 6FLHQWLVWV of Scotland are preserved to a greater are pressing for large-scale conversion degree than in almost any other European of marginal land to arable and should country. At the present time 11 million the Government accept their views the acres, out of a total of 21 million acres, are position will change overnight. It must rough pasture (compared with 5 million also be borne in mind that, with the for England and Wales combined); powerful agricultural tools now available, and enshrined in this rough pasture are WKH VPDOO DQG VXSHUÀFLDO UHPDLQV ZKLFK ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 387

form the bulk of the unrecorded material QRWUHTXLULQJFRQÀUPDWLRQRQWKHJURXQG will not be merely levelled by cultivation may be as high as 50%; and it is safe to but will be totally eradicated. say that no interpreter, working purely 4. This threat can be met only by the IURPSKRWRJUDSKVZRXOGKDYHLGHQWLÀHG immediate employment of stereoscopic the Roxburgh palisade-structures. The photographs to identify all unrecorded need for planning each discovery has monuments: (a) in areas scheduled for already been referred to. It is obvious afforestation, development, or Service that without the assistance the Ordnance use; and (b) in marginal areas throughout 6XUYH\ LQWHUSUHWHUV FDQQRW IXOÀO WKHVH Scotland. A topographic description requirements as urgently as the situation should be made of each monument, demands. accompanied wherever possible by a 5. The Commission’s archaeological staff plan, while those considered worthy of are likely to complete the surveys of preservation should be scheduled by prehistoric monuments of Roxburghshire the Ancient Monuments Inspectorate. and Selkirkshire in the summer of 1950, It would seem to be axiomatic that while the descriptions should be written responsibility for carrying out (a) should up by January 1951. It is for consideration rest with the Inspectorate as the authority whether this staff, instead of beginning appointed to vet development schemes in the survey of Peeblesshire, should not so far as they are likely to affect ancient then engage on a comprehensive air- monuments. The Inspectorate, however, photo study of all marginal land and relies mainly on the archaeological development schemes in Scotland, information supplied by the OS maps and FRXSOHG ZLWK ÀHOGVXUYH\V RI QHZO\ does not use stereoscopic photographs. discovered sites in these areas. On the (The consequences of this were noted basis of a pilot survey of 400 square E\ WKH &RPPLVVLRQ·V RIÀFHUV RQ :' miles in Aberdeenshire it is estimated [War Department] land at Stobs, near that the examination of the photos could Hawick, where one native fort, not be completed in six months. The time marked on the map but plainly visible on UHTXLUHG IRU JURXQGFKHFNLQJ DQG ÀHOG the photographs, has been mutilated by surveying cannot be closely estimated tanks, while the unrecorded annexe to a until all the photos have been examined, known fort has been turned into a mine- but it is probable that it would amount ÀHOG  7KH ODUJHU SUREOHP E  LV EHLQJ to three seasons of six months each. A dealt with by the Archaeological Branch tentative programme may therefore be of the Ordnance Survey which now drawn up as follows: HPSOR\VWZRRIÀFHUVH[FOXVLYHO\RQDLU photo interpretation. On the other hand January – March 1951 to obtain full value from the photographs Study of photographs it is essential that the interpreter should April – September 1951 QRW RQO\ KDYH D ÀUVWKDQG DFTXDLQWDQFH Field-work with the various types of monuments to be found in different regions, but also that October – December 1951 he should rigorously ground-check each Complete study of photos suspected new discovery. The proportion January – March 1952 of these ‘suspects’ to obvious discoveries, Write up previous summer’s notes 388 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013

April – September 1952 RCAHMS 102/4: Progress Reports presented by the Field-work Secretary to the Commissioners. RCAHMS 103/6: Marginal Lands/Forestry October 1952 – March 1953 Emergency Clearance/Agricultural Drainage. Write up previous summer’s notes RCAHMS 105/5: Commission Estimates 1945 to April – September 1953 1969. Field-work 5&$+06&RUUHVSRQGHQFHÀOHV –1950; January October 1953 – March 1954 1951–November 1956). Complete notes Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland Public ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Archive RCAHMS MS 1033/62 and 1033/73: OS Archaeology 7KLV FRQWULEXWLRQ KDV EHQHÀWHG JUHDWO\ IURP WKH Division Correspondence Files, RCAHMS and comments of Stratford Halliday in particular, but a Kenneth Steer. debt is also due to Graeme Cavers, Candy Hatherley, RCAHMS MS 36: Investigators’ notebooks, Lesley Ferguson, Tessa Poller, John Sherriff, Robin particularly those of K A Steer and R W Feachem. Turner, Adam Welfare and an anonymous referee. Ian Scott kindly shone a light on his early experience 5&$+06 $ODVWDLU 0DF/DUHQ $UFKLYH ² ÀOHV 8QLW at RCAHMS from 1958. Ian Parker prepared the No.14934–5), notebooks (Location 5/4/7). modern illustration of Dunnideer, and Georgina RCAHMS Typescripts: Marginal Land Survey Brown the two maps. Derek Smart, Tahra Duncan and (1951–8). Zoe Gibson photographed the original drawings, and RCAHMS Typescripts: Emergency Survey (1942–3). Alexander Crawford volunteered to assist with the cataloguing. RCAHMS National Collection of Aerial Photography.

ENDNOTES REFERENCES

1 Unpublished material from the RCAHMS archive Anderson, M L 1967 A History of Scottish Forestry is referred to either by its manuscript number (eg v2. London: Nelson. MS 1033), by the county typescript page, when Atkinson, R J C 1952 ‘Four new henge monuments referring to material from this project (eg TS: 13), in Scotland and Northumberland’, Proc Soc Antiq or, in the case of material in the business archive, Scot 84: 59–66. E\LWVXQLTXHÀOHQXPEHU HJ  Bryden, J 1995 ‘Scottish Agriculture 1950–1990’, 2 The Commission holds a number of boxes of 6FRWWLVK 7UDGLWLRQ -RXUQDO RI WKH &DQDGLDQ material from the late Alastair MacLaren, the Association for Scottish Studies 20: 44–64. locations of which are detailed below. These Calder, C S T 1958 ‘Report on the discovery of include notebooks, letters, manuscript and numerous stone-age house sites in Shetland’, typescript material from the 1950s. Proc Soc Antiq Scot 89: 340–97. Caldwell, D H, Ewart, G & Triscott, J 1998 ‘Auldhill, Portencross’, Archaeological Journal 155: 22– DOCUMENTARY SOURCES 81. Royal Commission on the Ancient and Christison, D 1900 ‘The forts, “camps”, and other ÀHOGZRUNV RI 3HUWK )RUIDU DQG .LQFDUGLQH· Historical Monuments of Scotland Business Proc Soc Antiq Scot 34: 43–120. Papers Cowie, T 1977 ‘Dalry, Carwinning Hill’, Discovery RCAHMS 102/1: Commission meetings, minutes and DQG([FDYDWLRQ6FRWODQG: 8. agendas, papers circulated before meetings. Cowie, T 1978 ‘Carwinning Hill, hillfort, cairn, RCAHMS 102/3: Commission meetings, programme structural remains’, 'LVFRYHU\ DQG ([FDYDWLRQ of work. Scotland 1978: 28. ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 389

Craw, J H 1921 ‘Notes on Berwickshire Forts, with a Wheeler on the occasion of his eightieth year, Description of those Recently Discovered’, Proc 27–8. Southampton: Southampton University Soc Antiq Scot 55: 231–55. Archaeology Society. Cruden, S 1955 ‘Dounreay Atomic Station, Caithness’, Graham, A 1950 ‘The Royal Commission on the 'LVFRYHU\ DQG ([FDYDWLRQ LQ 6FRWODQG : Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland, 34. Part II’, 7KH $UFKDHRORJLFDO 1HZV /HWWHU 3/1 Dunbar, J G 1981 ‘Angus Graham’, Proc Soc Antiq (June 1950): 1–3. Scot 111: 1–6. Harding, D W 2004 7KH ,URQ $JH LQ 1RUWKHUQ Dunbar, J G 1992 ‘The Royal Commission on the Britain; Celts, Romans and invaders. London: Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland: Routledge. WKHÀUVWHLJKW\\HDUV·7UDQVDFWLRQVRIWKH$QFLHQW Hawkes, C & Piggott, S (eds) 1948 ‘Survey and Monuments Society 36: 13–77. SROLF\ RI ÀHOG UHVHDUFK LQ WKH DUFKDHRORJ\ RI Dunbar, J G & Maxwell, G S 2007 ‘Obituary: Great Britain. The prehistoric and Early Historic Kenneth Arthur Steer’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 137: Ages to the 7th Century ad’, CBA Occasional 1–4. 3DSHUV1R. Dunwell, A 1999 ‘Edin’s Hall fort, broch and Hingley, R, Moore, H L, Triscott, J E, & Wilson, G settlement, Berwickshire (Scottish Borders): 1997 ‘The excavation of two later Iron Age UHFHQWÀHOGZRUNDQGQHZSHUFHSWLRQV·Proc Soc IRUWLÀHG KRPHVWHDGV DW $OGFOXQH %ODLU $WKROO Antiq Scot 129: 303–57. Perth & Kinross’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 127: 407– English Heritage 2002 :LWK $OLGDGH DQG 7DSH. 66. Swindon: English Heritage. Hogg, A H A 1975 Hill-forts of Britain. London: Feachem, R W 1950 ‘Broomholm Knowe’, Discovery Hart-Davis, Macgibbon. DQG([FDYDWLRQLQ6FRWODQG: 8. Jobey, G 1976 ‘Traprain law: a summary’, in Harding, Feachem, R W 1951 ‘A Roman Fort at Broomholm’, D W (ed) +LOOIRUWVODWHUSUHKLVWRULFHDUWKZRUNV 7UDQVDFWLRQVRIWKH'XPIULHVVKLUHDQG*DOORZD\ in Britain and Ireland, 192–204. London: 28 1DWXUDO +LVWRU\ DQG $QWLTXDULDQ 6RFLHW\ Academic Press Inc. (1949–50): 188–9. Lonie, W & Newall, F 1968 ‘Dyke bar hill’, Discovery )HDFKHP5:¶)RUWLÀFDWLRQV·in Wainwright, DQG([FDYDWLRQLQ6FRWODQG: 36. F T (ed) 7KH 3UREOHP RI WKH 3LFWV, 66–86. London: Nelson. MacLaren, A 1974 ‘A Norse house on Drimore Machair, South Uist’, Feachem, R W 1956 ‘Iron Age and Medieval *ODVJRZ $UFKDHRORJLFDO Journal 3: 9–18. Monuments in Galloway and Dumfriesshire’, 7UDQVDFWLRQVRIWKH'XPIULHVVKLUHDQG*DOORZD\ Mackie, E W 2007 7KH 5RXQGKRXVHV %URFKV DQG 1DWXUDO +LVWRU\ DQG $QWLTXDULDQ 6RFLHW\ 33 Wheelhouses of Atlantic Scotland c 700 BC–AD (1954–5): 58–65.  DUFKLWHFWXUH DQG PDWHULDO FXOWXUH. Part 2. Feachem, R WD¶7KHIRUWLÀFDWLRQVRQ7UDSUDLQ 7KH 1RUWKHUQ DQG 6RXWKHUQ 0DLQODQG DQG WKH Law’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 89: 284–9. Western Islands. Oxford: Archaeopress. BAR Feachem, R W 1958b ‘Six Roman Camps near British series 444. the Antonine Wall’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 89: McLaren, M 1952 ‘Edinburgh’s Stones’, 7LPHV 329–39. /LWHUDU\6XSSOHPHQW11 January 1952: 28. Feachem, R W 1963a Prehistoric Scotland. London: Mercer, R 1982 ‘The excavation of a late Neolithic Batsford. Henge-type enclosure at Balfarg, Markinch, Fife, Feachem, R W 1963b ‘Unenclosed platform settle- Scotland’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 111: 63–171. ments’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 94: 79–85. Mercer, R 1998 ‘Stuart Piggott 1910–1996’, Feachem, R W 1966 ‘The Hill-forts of Northern Proceedings of the British Academy 97: 413–42. Britain’, in Rivet, A L F (ed) 7KH ,URQ $JH LQ Newall, F 1960 ([FDYDWLRQV DW :DOOV +LOO 1RUWKHUQ%ULWDLQ, 59–88. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Renfrewshire. Paisley: Paisley Museum and Art University Press. Galleries. )HDFKHP 5 :  ¶8QÀQLVKHG KLOOIRUWV· in Piggott, C M 1950 ‘The excavations at Hownam Hill, D & Jesson, M (eds) 7KH,URQ$JHDQGLWV Rings, Roxburghshire’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 82: KLOOIRUWV SDSHUV SUHVHQWHG WR 6LU 0RUWLPHU 193–225. 390 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013

Piggott, C M 1951 ‘The Iron Age Settlement at RCAHMS 1951 An inventory of the ancient and Hayhope Knowe, Roxburghshire’ Proc Soc KLVWRULFDOPRQXPHQWVRIWKH&LW\RI(GLQEXUJK Antiq Scot 83: 45–67. ZLWK WKH WKLUWHHQWK UHSRUW RI WKH &RPPLVVLRQ Piggott, C M 1952 ‘Excavations at Bonchester Hill, Edinburgh: HMSO. 1950’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 84: 113–37 RCAHMS 1956 An inventory of the ancient and Piggott, S 1947 ‘Review: Royal Commission on the KLVWRULFDOPRQXPHQWVRI5R[EXUJKVKLUHZLWKWKH Ancient Monuments of Scotland. Twelfth report, fourteenth report of the Commission. Edinburgh: with an Inventory of the ancient monuments of HMSO. Orkney and Shetland’, Antiquaries Journal 27: RCAHMS 1957 An inventory of the ancient and 92–3. historical monuments of Selkirkshire with the Piggott, S 1953 ‘Excavations in the broch and hill- ÀIWHHQWK UHSRUW RI WKH &RPPLVVLRQ Edinburgh: fort of Torwoodlee, Selkirkshire, 1950’, Proc Soc HMSO. Antiq Scot 85: 92–117. RCAHMS 1963 6WLUOLQJVKLUH $Q ,QYHQWRU\ RI WKH Piggott, S 1966 ‘A Scheme for the Scottish Iron Age’, $QFLHQW0RQXPHQWV Edinburgh: HMSO. in Rivet, A L F (ed) 7KH,URQ$JHLQ1RUWKHUQ RCAHMS 1967 3HHEOHVVKLUH ,QYHQWRU\ RI WKH Britain, 1–16. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Ancient Monuments. Edinburgh: HMSO. Press. RCAHMS 1971 $UJ\OO$Q,QYHQWRU\RIWKH$QFLHQW Proudfoot, E V W 1983 ‘The Society of Antiquaries Monuments. 9ROXPH  .LQW\UH Edinburgh: of Scotland Archaeological Field Survey’, Proc HMSO. Soc Antiq Scot 112: 1–16. RCAHMS 1978 /DQDUNVKLUH $Q ,QYHQWRU\ RI WKH Reiach, A 1952 ‘Book Review: The Royal Commis- 3UHKLVWRULFDQG5RPDQ0RQXPHQWV Edinburgh: sion on the Ancient and Historical Monuments HMSO. of Scotland, An Inventory of the Ancient and RCAHMS 1985 7KH DUFKDHRORJLFDO VLWHV DQG Historical Monuments of the City of Edinburgh’, PRQXPHQWVRI:HVW5KLQV Edinburgh: HMSO. RIBA Journal 59: 223. RCAHMS 1990 1RUWKHDVW3HUWKDQDUFKDHRORJLFDO Richmond, I A 1952 ‘Excavations at the Roman landscape. Edinburgh: HMSO. fort of Newstead, 1947’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 84: RCAHMS 1994 6RXWKHDVW3HUWKDQDUFKDHRORJLFDO 1–38. landscape. Edinburgh: HMSO. Ritchie, J N G 2002 ‘James Curle (1862–1944) and RCAHMS 1997 (DVWHUQ 'XPIULHVVKLUH DQ Alexander Ormiston Curle (1866–1955): pillars archaeological landscape. Edinburgh: HMSO. of the establishment’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 132: RCAHMS 2007 In the Shadow of Bennachie – A 19–41. ÀHOG DUFKDHRORJ\ RI 'RQVLGH, Aberdeenshire. Ritchie, J N G 2005 ‘Obituary: Richard Feachem Edinburgh: RCAHMS. (1914–2005)’, 6FRWWLVK$UFKDHRORJLFDO1HZV 47: RCAHMS 2011 $ 3UDFWLFDO *XLGH WR 5HFRUGLQJ 10. Archaeological Sites. Edinburgh: RCAHMS. Rivet, A L F 1967 ‘Review: Peeblesshire: An RCHME 1963 0RQXPHQWV7KUHDWHQHGRU'HVWUR\HG Inventory of the Ancient Monuments’, $6HOHFW/LVW²LondonHMSO. Archaeological Journal 124: 259–60. Sargent, A 2001 ‘RCHME 1908–1998, A History RCAHMS 1909 First report and inventory of of the Royal Commission on the Historical monuments and constructions in the county of Monuments of England’, 7UDQVDFWLRQV RI WKH Berwick. Edinburgh: HMSO. Ancient Monuments Society 45: 57–80. RCAHMS 1915 6L[WK UHSRUW ZLWK LQYHQWRU\ RI Smith, J 1895 Prehistoric Man in Ayrshire. London: monuments and constructions in the county of Elliot Stock. %HUZLFN UHYLVLRQ  Edinburgh: HMSO. Steer, K A 1947 ‘Archaeology and the National Air- RCAHMS 1924 Eighth report with inventory of photograph Survey’, Antiquity 21: 50–3. monuments and constructions in the county of Steer, K A 1953 ‘Eildon Hill North’, Discovery and (DVW/RWKLDQ. Edinburgh: HMSO. ([FDYDWLRQLQ6FRWODQG: 15–16. RCAHMS 1933 Eleventh report with inventory of Steer, K A 1957 ‘Craighill, Angus’, Discovery and monuments and constructions in the counties ([FDYDWLRQLQ6FRWODQG: 39. of Fife, Kinross, and Clackmannan. Edinburgh: Steer, K A 1958 ‘The early Iron Age homestead at HMSO. West Plean’, Proc Soc Antiq Scot 89: 227–49. ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE MARGINS – RCAHMS EMERGENCY SURVEY IN THE 1950s | 391

Stewart, M E C 1969 ‘The ring forts of central *ODVJRZ $UFKDHRORJLFDO 6RFLHW\ %XOOHWLQ 2, 1: Perthshire’, 7UDQVDFWLRQV DQG 3URFHHGLQJV 3–4. 3HUWKVKLUH6RFLHW\1DWXUDO6FLHQFH 12: 21–32. Thomas, N 1960 $ *XLGH WR 3UHKLVWRULF (QJODQG. Strachan, R 2000 ‘Mull of Galloway linear earthworks, London: Batsford. Dumfries and Galloway (Kirkmaiden parish), Woolliscroft, D J, Hughes, A J, & Lockett, N J, 2002 survey; evaluative excavation’, Discovery and ‘Six suspected small Roman temporary camps’, ([FDYDWLRQLQ6FRWODQG: 21. in Woolliscroft, D J 7KH 5RPDQ IURQWLHU RQ Symon, J A 1959 Scottish Farming, Past and Present. WKH*DVN5LGJH3HUWKDQG.LQURVVDQLQWHULP Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd. UHSRUWRQWKH5RPDQ*DVN3URMHFW², Talbot, E J 1973 ‘Excavations at The Mound, 12 32–5. Oxford: Archaeopress. BAR British High Road, Dastlehead, Paisley (NS 475632)’, Series 335. 392 | SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND, 2013