DOCSLIB.ORG

Trajectories of Engendered Archaeology in the Mortuary Record of Iron Age Britain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trajectories of Engendered Archaeology in the Mortuary Record of Iron Age Britain Durham E-Theses Facing Gender: A Historiographical Analysis of Gender Construction in Iron Age Britain MATIAS, JO ZALEA BURAC How to cite: MATIAS, JO ZALEA BURAC (2015) Facing Gender: A Historiographical Analysis of Gender Construction in Iron Age Britain, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12110/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Durham E-Theses Facing Gender: A Historiographical Analysis of Gender Construction in Iron Age Britain MATIAS, JO,ZALEA,BURAC How to cite: MATIAS, JO,ZALEA,BURAC (2015) Facing Gender: A Historiographical Analysis of Gender Construction in Iron Age Britain, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12106/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Abstract Facing Gender: A Historiographical Analysis of Gender Construction in Iron Age Britain Jo Zalea Burac Matias The aim of this thesis is to understand the ways that gender is continually constructed, perceived and presented in Iron Age Britain. A historiographic analysis uses both classical literature and Iron Age social models to provide the theoretical basis for understanding gender. The use of literature and mortuary data examines the current limits of gendered analysis for Iron Age Britain amd an examination of archaeological reconstructions discusses the actual presentation of gender for the period. Their purpose is to create a well-rounded view of all the influences that drive views of gender, one that is informed by the archaeological material, theory and classical literature, as well as other factors. Though gender bias is present in discussions of gender for Iron Age Britain, gender as a topic is largely absent. Iron Age peoples are mostly discussed as monolithic entities – a group or culture rather than individuals. When gender does present itself, it manifests in male and female binaries, though not necessarily male warriors and female domestics. There is little discussion of gender as it relates to other aspects of identity, such as age and class, except in some recent studies. The male/female binary is largely static over time in British Iron Age literature, as is the presentation of society’s identity, rather than people’s identities. Iron Age Britain is faceless, populated by stock images rather than fully fleshed individuals. The analyses here demonstrate the need to keep examining gender and other identities so that Iron Age society is discussed on both a societal level and a personal level. i ii Facing Gender: A Historiographical Analysis of Gender Construction in Iron Age Britain Two Volumes Volume I Jo Zalea Burac Matias Department of Archaeology Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Durham University 2015 iii Table of Contents Volume I Abstract ............................................................................................................................ i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................ viii Table of Figures ............................................................................................................. ix Copyright ...................................................................................................................... xiii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... xv Chapter 1: Gender in Iron Age Britain ........................................................................ 1 1.1. Approaching gender ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Aims .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Structure, objectives and methodology of the thesis ........................................................ 3 Chapter 2: An Engendered Archaeology ..................................................................... 7 2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.2. Gender: Theoretical Underpinnings ................................................................................... 8 2.2.1. Gender studies in and beyond the social sciences ...................................................... 8 2.2.2. Gender theory in archaeology ..................................................................................... 9 2.2.3. Major themes and issues in the application of third-wave feminist theory to archaeology ......................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.3.a. Sex and Gender ................................................................................................... 14 2.2.3.b. Performativity and the Archaeological Body ..................................................... 17 2.2.3.c. No more gender? ................................................................................................ 19 2.3. Gender in Iron Age Britain ................................................................................................ 20 2.3.1. Iron Age Britain: men, women or genderless? .......................................................... 20 2.3.2. Material culture and embodied gender .................................................................... 25 2.3.3. Burials and skeletal material ..................................................................................... 26 2.4. Bioarchaeology and Gender ............................................................................................. 29 2.4.1. Gendered activities and the skeleton ....................................................................... 29 2.4.2. Health, disease and isotopic analysis ........................................................................ 31 2.4.3. Trauma, violence and warfare .................................................................................. 32 2.4.4. The sex and gender debate and future research trajectories ................................... 32 2.5. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 34 Chapter 3: Gender and Social Models in Iron Age Britain ...................................... 36 3.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 36 3.2. Searching for gender ........................................................................................................ 36 3.2.1. Hawkes and his critics on gender .............................................................................. 38 3.2.2. Structuring Society .................................................................................................... 41 3.2.3. Post-Processual Social Models ............................................................................ 44 3.2.4. Examining the major publications ............................................................................. 46 3.2.5. Discussion .................................................................................................................. 48 iv 3.3. “Celtic” and contemporary society and gender ............................................................... 49 3.3.1. Classical constructions of Iron Age people ................................................................ 50 3.3.1.a References to men, women and children in the classical sources........................ 51 3.3.1.b Masculinity and the Celtic Warrior ..................................................................... 53 3.3.1.c Feasting and gender ............................................................................................. 56 3.3.1.d Druids, religion and gender ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Framework Revised.Vp
    Frontispiece: the Norfolk Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Survey team recording timbers and ballast from the wreck of The Sheraton on Hunstanton beach, with Hunstanton cliffs and lighthouse in the background. Photo: David Robertson, copyright NAU Archaeology Research and Archaeology Revisited: a revised framework for the East of England edited by Maria Medlycott East Anglian Archaeology Occasional Paper No.24, 2011 ALGAO East of England EAST ANGLIAN ARCHAEOLOGY OCCASIONAL PAPER NO.24 Published by Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers East of England http://www.algao.org.uk/cttees/Regions Editor: David Gurney EAA Managing Editor: Jenny Glazebrook Editorial Board: Brian Ayers, Director, The Butrint Foundation Owen Bedwin, Head of Historic Environment, Essex County Council Stewart Bryant, Head of Historic Environment, Hertfordshire County Council Will Fletcher, English Heritage Kasia Gdaniec, Historic Environment, Cambridgeshire County Council David Gurney, Historic Environment Manager, Norfolk County Council Debbie Priddy, English Heritage Adrian Tindall, Archaeological Consultant Keith Wade, Archaeological Service Manager, Suffolk County Council Set in Times Roman by Jenny Glazebrook using Corel Ventura™ Printed by Henry Ling Limited, The Dorset Press © ALGAO East of England ISBN 978 0 9510695 6 1 This Research Framework was published with the aid of funding from English Heritage East Anglian Archaeology was established in 1975 by the Scole Committee for Archaeology in East Anglia. The scope of the series expanded to include all six eastern counties and responsi- bility for publication passed in 2002 to the Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers, East of England (ALGAO East). Cover illustration: The excavation of prehistoric burial monuments at Hanson’s Needingworth Quarry at Over, Cambridgeshire, by Cambridge Archaeological Unit in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • AVAS Newsletter 2016
    AVON VALLEY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER December 2016 Editorial This year is a swan song for me as this twelfth edition of the Newsletter will be my last one. I feel that I have had a good innings and that it is time to pass baton on to someone who will bring a fresh vision to the task. As I stated last year there is a distinct move away from excavation work in archaeology and this trend is continuing, but our work with resistivity techniques to do non-invasive searches, supplemented by the use of Magnetometry, using some equipment borrowed from Bournemouth University has proved a revelation. For those who wish to know more and see some of the results, then attendance at our Members Evening in January is a must! We really are discovering more and disturb less! My last edition of our newsletter, like a number of previous copies is taking in some practical archaeological topics and attempting to stimulate members to seek out even more interesting places based upon the travels of a number of our members. Our blog site continues to flourishing. So once again, our thanks go to Mike Gill for his continuing work in keeping the news of activities and plans of AVAS available to our members and the general public at large. So let us all support them with any useful news or other input that we, as members, might come up with. N.B. The address on the web for our blogsite is at the bottom of this page. I hope that this edition of the Newsletter will be both stimulating and entertaining and wish you all great year of archaeology in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Book Collection 2013
    Archaeology Book Collection 2013 The archaeology book collection is held on the upper floor of the Student Research Room (2M.25) and is arranged in alphabetical order. The journals in this collection are at the end of the document identified with the ‘author’ as ‘ZJ’. Use computer keys CTRL + F to search for a title/author. Abulafia, D. (2003). The Mediterranean in history. London, Thames & Hudson. Adkins, L. and R. Adkins (1989). Archaeological illustration. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Adkins, L. and R. A. Adkins (1982). A thesaurus of British archaeology. Newton Abbot, David & Charles. Adkins, R., et al. (2008). The handbook of British archaeology. London, Constable. Alcock, L. (1963). Celtic Archaeology and Art, University of Wales Press. Alcock, L. (1971). Arthur's Britain : history and archaeology, AD 367-634. London, Allen Lane. Alcock, L. (1973). Arthur's Britain: History and Archaeology AD 367-634. Harmondsworth, Penguin. Aldred, C. (1972). Akhenaten: Pharaoh of Egypt. London, Abacus; Sphere Books. Alimen, H. and A. H. Brodrick (1957). The prehistory of Africa. London, Hutchinson. Allan, J. P. (1984). Medieval and Post-Medieval Finds from Exeter 1971-1980. Exeter, Exeter City Council and the University of Exeter. Allen, D. F. (1980). The Coins of the Ancient Celts. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press. Allibone, T. E. and S. Royal (1970). The impact of the natural sciences on archaeology. A joint symposium of the Royal Society and the British Academy. Organized by a committee under the chairmanship of T. E. Allibone, F.R.S, London: published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press. Alves, F. and E.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Statement
    COPYRIGHT STATEMENT This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. i ii REX WHISTLER (1905 – 1944): PATRONAGE AND ARTISTIC IDENTITY by NIKKI FRATER A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Humanities & Performing Arts Faculty of Arts and Humanities September 2014 iii Nikki Frater REX WHISTLER (1905-1944): PATRONAGE AND ARTISTIC IDENTITY Abstract This thesis explores the life and work of Rex Whistler, from his first commissions whilst at the Slade up until the time he enlisted for active service in World War Two. His death in that conflict meant that this was a career that lasted barely twenty years; however it comprised a large range of creative endeavours. Although all these facets of Whistler’s career are touched upon, the main focus is on his work in murals and the fields of advertising and commercial design. The thesis goes beyond the remit of a purely biographical stance and places Whistler’s career in context by looking at the contemporary art world in which he worked, and the private, commercial and public commissions he secured. In doing so, it aims to provide a more comprehensive account of Whistler’s achievement than has been afforded in any of the existing literature or biographies. This deeper examination of the artist’s practice has been made possible by considerable amounts of new factual information derived from the Whistler Archive and other archival sources.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 CAG Library Index
    Ref Book Name Author B020 (Shire) ANCIENT AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS Sian Rees B015 (Shire) ANCIENT BOATS Sean McGrail B017 (Shire) ANCIENT FARMING Peter J.Reynolds B009 (Shire) ANGLO-SAXON POTTERY D.H.Kenneth B198 (Shire) ANGLO-SAXON SCULPTURE James Lang B011 (Shire) ANIMAL REMAINS IN ARCHAEOLOGY Rosemary Margaret Luff B010 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF GARDENS Christopher Taylor B268 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF GARDENS Christopher Taylor B039 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Peter Harrington B276 (Shire) ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Peter Harrington B240 (Shire) AVIATION ARCHAEOLOGY IN BRITAIN Guy de la Bedoyere B014 (Shire) BARROWS IN ENGLAND AND WALES L.V.Grinsell B250 (Shire) BELLFOUNDING Trevor S Jennings B030 (Shire) BOUDICAN REVOLT AGAINST ROME Paul R. Sealey B214 (Shire) BREWING AND BREWERIES Maurice Lovett B003 (Shire) BRICKS & BRICKMAKING M.Hammond B241 (Shire) BROCHS OF SCOTLAND J.N.G. Ritchie B026 (Shire) BRONZE AGE COPPER MINING William O'Brian B245 (Shire) BRONZE AGE COPPER MINING IN BRITAIN AND William O'Brien B230 (Shire) CAVE ART Andrew J. Lawson B035 (Shire) CELTIC COINAGE Philip de Jersey B032 (Shire) CELTIC CROSSES OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND Malcolm Seaborne B205 (Shire) CELTIC WARRIORS W.F. & J.N.G.Ritchie B006 (Shire) CHURCH FONTS Norman Pounds B243 (Shire) CHURCH MEMORIAL BRASSES AND BRASS Leigh Chapman B024 (Shire) CLAY AND COB BUILDINGS John McCann B002 (Shire) CLAY TOBACCO PIPES E.G.Agto B257 (Shire) COMPUTER ARCHAEOLOGY Gary Lock and John Wilcock B007 (Shire) DECORATIVE LEADWORK P.M.Sutton-Goold B029 (Shire) DESERTED VILLAGES Trevor Rowley and John Wood B238 (Shire) DESERTED VILLAGES Trevor Rowley and John Wood B270 (Shire) DRY STONE WALLS Lawrence Garner B018 (Shire) EARLY MEDIEVAL TOWNS IN BRITAIN Jeremy Haslam B244 (Shire) EGYPTIAN PYRAMIDS AND MASTABA TOMBS Philip Watson B027 (Shire) FENGATE Francis Pryor B204 (Shire) GODS OF ROMAN BRITAIN Miranda J.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching Stonehenge: Theories Past and Present
    Parker Pearson, M 2013 Researching Stonehenge: Theories Past and Present. Archaeology International, No. 16 (2012-2013): 72-83, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ai.1601 ARTICLE Researching Stonehenge: Theories Past and Present Mike Parker Pearson* Over the years archaeologists connected with the Institute of Archaeology and UCL have made substantial contributions to the study of Stonehenge, the most enigmatic of all the prehistoric stone circles in Britain. Two of the early researchers were Petrie and Childe. More recently, colleagues in UCL’s Anthropology department – Barbara Bender and Chris Tilley – have also studied and written about the monument in its landscape. Mike Parker Pearson, who joined the Institute in 2012, has been leading a 10-year-long research programme on Stonehenge and, in this paper, he outlines the history and cur- rent state of research. Petrie and Childe on Stonehenge William Flinders Petrie (Fig. 1) worked on Stonehenge between 1874 and 1880, publishing the first accurate plan of the famous stones as a young man yet to start his career in Egypt. His numbering system of the monument’s many sarsens and blue- stones is still used to this day, and his slim book, Stonehenge: Plans, Descriptions, and Theories, sets out theories and observations that were innovative and insightful. Denied the opportunity of excavating Stonehenge, Petrie had relatively little to go on in terms of excavated evidence – the previous dig- gings had yielded few prehistoric finds other than antler picks – but he suggested that four theories could be considered indi- vidually or in combination for explaining Stonehenge’s purpose: sepulchral, religious, astronomical and monumental.
    [Show full text]
  • Esconet Text Retrieval System
    EscoNet Text Retrieval System TEST VALLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL - PLANNING SERVICES WEEKLY LIST OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS : NO. 7 Week Ending: Friday, 15 February 2002 Comments on any of these matters should be forwarded IN WRITING to arrive before the expiry date shown in the last column For the Northern Area (TVN) to: For the Southern Area (TVS) to Head of Planning Head of Planning Council Offices 'Beech Hurst' Duttons Road Weyhill Road ROMSEY SO51 8XG ANDOVER SPIO 3AJ In accordance with the provisions of the Local Government (Access to Information Act) 1985, any representations received may be open to public inspection PLANNING APPLICATIONS APPLICATION NO. / PROPOSAL LOCATION APPLICANT CASE OFFICER / REGISTRATION DATE PUBLICITY EXPIRY DATE http://www.minutes.org.uk/cgi-bin/cgi003.exe?Y,20020101,20021231,00000...,,,15.02.02,6138848,6235415,1,000000050202,1,1,1,P,23001392,0,00,00,N (1 of 9) [20/06/2013 13:49:04] EscoNet Text Retrieval System TVN.07863/1 Outline - Erection of three detached Land off Abbotts Hill, ABBOTTS Washington And Company Elizabeth Walker 15.02.2002 dwellings ANN 15.03.2002 TVN.08405 Erection of two storey extension to 74a Charlton Road, Andover Mr And Mrs Holloway Beryl Burgess 11.02.2002 south west elevation to provide HARROWAY 12.03.2002 kitchen and dining room with two bedrooms over TVN.A.00586 Installation of two single Bus shelter opposite Shepherds Adshel Gavin Spiller 12.02.2002 illuminated advertisement panels Spring School, Smannell Road, 12.03.2002 forming an integral part of a bus Andover ALAMEIN
    [Show full text]
  • The Fifteenth Mount Haemus Lecture
    THE ORDER OF BARDS OVATES & DRUIDS MOUNT HAEMUS LECTURE FOR THE YEAR 2014 The Fifteenth Mount Haemus Lecture ‘Almost unmentionable in polite society’? Druidry and Archaeologists in the Later Twentieth Century by Dr Julia Farley Introduction Between 1950 and 1964, a major programme of archaeological excavations were carried out at Stonehenge, directed by archaeologists Richard Atkinson and Stuart Piggott. The excavations were not published in full until after Atkinson’s death (Cleal et al. 1995), but Atkinson penned a popular account of the site in 1956, entitled simply Stonehenge, which was aimed at “the ordinary visitor” (Atkinson 1956, xiv). The book was, in part, intended to dispel once and for all the popular notion that there was a direct connection between ancient Druids and Stonehenge. Atkinson went so far as to write that “Druids have so firm a hold upon the popular imagination, particularly in connection with Stonehenge, and have been the subject of so much ludicrous and unfounded speculation, that archaeologists in general have come to regard them as almost unmentionable in polite society.” (ibid., 91). This quote is notable for two reasons. Firstly, it highlights the often fraught relationships between archaeologists and Druidry in the mid-twentieth century and, secondly, it was soon to be revealed as demonstrably untrue. At the time that Atkinson was writing, the last major academic treatment of the ancient Druids was Thomas Kendrick’s The Druids, published in 1927. But a decade after the publication of Atkinson’s book, at a time of heightened tensions with modern Druid movements over rights and access to Stonehenge, two major academic monographs on ancient Druids were published (Piggott 1966, Chadwick 1966), as well as a scholarly work on ‘Pagan Celtic Britain’ (Ross 1967).
    [Show full text]
  • M+W Sites List (HF000007092018)
    Hampshire County Council Site Code Site Name Grid Ref Operator / Agent Site Description Site Status Site Narrative (* = Safeguarded), (†=Chargeable site) Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council BA009 Newnham Common 470336 Hampshire County Council Landfill (restored) Site completed Restored non-inert landfill, closed in 1986 but subject to leachate monitoring not monitored (closed site, low priority) 153471 BA017† Apple Dell 451004 Portals Landfill (inert) Lapsed permission Dormant; deposit of non-toxic cellulose waste from paper making processes for a period of ten years (BDB46323) (Agriculture - 2009) Permission expired, no monitoring. Overton 148345 BA018* Wade Road 465127 Basingstoke Skip Hire, Hampshire County Council, Waste Processing, HWRC Active Waste transfer, including construction, demolition, industrial, household and clinical waste and household waste recycling centre; extension and improvement of household waste recycling Basingstoke 153579 Veolia Environmental Services (UK) Plc centre (BDB/60584); erection of waste recycling building (BDB/61845); erection of extension to existing waste recycling building (BDB/64564); extension and improvement of household waste recycling centre (BDB/69806) granted 12.2008 - 2 monitoring visits per year. BA019* Chineham Energy Recovery Facility 467222 Veolia Environmental Services (UK) Plc Waste Processing (energy Active Energy recovery incinerator (BDB044300) commissioned in autumn 2002 with handover in January 2003; the incinerator has the capacity to process at least 90,000 tonnes a year,
    [Show full text]
  • 07 Cunliffe 1686 13/11/09 13:48 Page 161
    07 Cunliffe 1686 13/11/09 13:48 Page 161 ALBERT RECKITT ARCHAEOLOGICAL LECTURE Continuity and Change in a Wessex Landscape BARRY CUNLIFFE Fellow of the Academy THE WESSEX LANDSCAPE with which we are concerned is an area of some 450 sq km of chalkland situated in the centre of the chalk uplands of southern Britain (Fig. 1). Its central position gives it a special character. It is, above all, a route node where the east–west ridgeways from the North Downs, the South Downs, Cranborne Chase and the Marlborough Downs converge with the north–south river routes, the Avon and the Test, which provide access, through the forests and heathlands of the Hampshire Basin, to the waters of the Solent beyond. But there is an ambivalence about the region. While open to influences from all direc- tions, this very openness endowed it with a strategic significance well understood by those who, in the past, wished to control the movements of peoples and commodities. As we will argue below, the region became a frontier zone for much of the latter part of the first millennium BC, dividing east from west. This block of downland was chosen for detailed study partly because of its commanding position in the landscape of central southern Britain but also because previous archaeological activity has provided an exten- sive database invaluable in developing a detailed research strategy. Most notable among the earlier work were the pre-war excavations of the Cunningtons and J. F. S. Stone focusing on Bronze Age and Iron Age settlements in eastern Wiltshire and the campaign of hillfort excavations Read at the Academy 23 October 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • 1948 Amgueddfa 00-02
    Amgueddfa Yearbook of the National Museums & Galleries of Wales, 2000 - 2002 First published in 2002 by National Museums & Galleries of Wales, Cathays Park, Cardiff, CF10 3NP, Wales. © National Museum of Wales ISBN 0 7200 0530 2 Production: Mari Gordon Design: Andrew Griffiths Printed by MWL Print Group Copyright of all images is NMGW unless stated otherwise. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise, without first seeking the written permission of the copyright owner(s) and of the publisher. Front cover: Flight exhibition (see page 56) Back cover: Let Paul Robeson Sing! exhibition (see page 52) Amgueddfa Yearbook of the National Museums & Galleries of Wales, 2000 - 2002 Editors: Teresa Darbyshire & Sioned Williams AMGUEDDFEYDD AC ORIELAU CENEDLAETHOL CYMRU NATIONAL MUSEUMS & GALLERIES OF WALES 2 Contents 3 Introduction by Anna Southall 4 List of NMGW Sites Collections & Acquisitions 5 Introduction 6 The British Bryological Society Herbarium (BBSUK) has a permanent home at NMGW 8 Dragons, Zebras and doorstops: NMGW's collection of Welsh computers 10 Beyond yesterday’s scalpel: donation of items from the former Miners’ Rehabilitation Centre at Talygarn House 12 Women in their own words 13 Aluminum Palaces 15 The Welsh Slate Museum clock 16 Distinguished service: Campaign and Gallantry Medals 18 Saving the Jackson Collection of silver 20 The Gilbey Gold Collection Research 21 Introduction 22 Rodrigues International
    [Show full text]
  • XXIV. a Descriptive Outline of the Roman Remains in Norfolk, by SAMUEL WOODWARD, Esq., in a Letter to HUDSON GURNBY, Esq
    358 XXIV. A descriptive Outline of the Roman Remains in Norfolk, by SAMUEL WOODWARD, Esq., in a Letter to HUDSON GURNBY, Esq. V.P., F.R.S. accompanied by a Map of the County. Read 23d December, 1830. DEAR SIR, HAVING done me the honour of exhibiting to the Society of Anti- quaries in March 1824, a rough draft of a Map of Roman Norfolk, with other Plans which related to Norwich, I now beg leave to transmit to the Society through you a more finished Map,a accompanied by a descrip- tive Outline of the Roman Remains in that county: and in so doing I can-, not but suggest, that if others, conversant with antiquarian pursuits, would construct similar Maps of other counties of Great Britain, the whole might form the basis of a Map of Roman Britain, which is much wanted. The advantages resulting, would, I am convinced, fully compensate the labour; much light would be thrown upon the works of Gale, Horsley, Reynolds, and other learned Antiquaries, who have written on the Itinerary of Antoninus; and the early history of this country be placed in a much clearer point of view than it has hitherto been. The accurate Surveys which have been taken of every County have removed the obstacles which before impeded such an attempt; and these, combined with the geological researches which have of late years been made, particularly in our maritime counties, afford sure data for such an undertaking. « Plate XXXI. Iffl M E T A R IS /ESTVAR IVM ". /:'. or'ti Descriptive Outline of the Roman Remains in Norfolk.
    [Show full text]