Frontispiece: the Norfolk Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Survey team recording timbers and ballast from the wreck of The Sheraton on Hunstanton beach, with Hunstanton cliffs and
lighthouse in the background. Photo: David Robertson, copyright NAU Archaeology
Research and Archaeology Revisited: a revised framework for the East of England
edited by Maria Medlycott
East Anglian Archaeology
Occasional Paper No.24, 2011
ALGAO East of England
EAST ANGLIAN ARCHAEOLOGY OCCASIONAL PAPER NO.24
Published by Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers East of England http://www.algao.org.uk/cttees/Regions
Editor: David Gurney EAA Managing Editor: Jenny Glazebrook
Editorial Board: Brian Ayers, Director, The Butrint Foundation Owen Bedwin, Head of Historic Environment, Essex County Council Stewart Bryant, Head of Historic Environment, Hertfordshire County Council Will Fletcher, English Heritage Kasia Gdaniec, Historic Environment, Cambridgeshire County Council David Gurney, Historic Environment Manager, Norfolk County Council Debbie Priddy, English Heritage Adrian Tindall, Archaeological Consultant Keith Wade, Archaeological Service Manager, Suffolk County Council
Set in Times Roman by Jenny Glazebrook using Corel Ventura™ Printed by Henry Ling Limited, The Dorset Press © ALGAO East of England
ISBN 978 0 9510695 6 1 This Research Framework was published with the aid of funding from English Heritage East Anglian Archaeology was established in 1975 by the Scole Committee for Archaeology in East Anglia. The scope of the series expanded to include all six eastern counties and responsibility for publication passed in 2002 to the Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers, East of England (ALGAO East).
Cover illustration:
The excavation of prehistoric burial monuments at Hanson’s Needingworth Quarry at Over, Cambridgeshire, by Cambridge Archaeological Unit in 2008.
Photo and copyright: Ben Robinson
Contents
Acknowledgements Abbreviations Summary vi vi vi
Manufacturing and industry Finds studies Roman/Saxon transition
48 48 48
Anglo-Saxon
Introduction
1
- National overview
- 49
49 49 50 53 53 55 55 55
Assessment of key projects
Roman/Saxon transition Landscape and settlement Coast
Palaeolithic and Mesolithic
National overview Assessment of key projects
Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic
Assessment of progress on topics proposed in 2000 Future research topics
334667
Burials Churches Industry Finds
Assessment of progress on topics proposed in 2000 56
Neolithic
Future research topics
Roman/Saxon transition
57 57 57 58 58 58 58 58 58 59 59 59 59
- Assessment of key projects
- 9
Assessment of progress on topics proposed in 2000 12 Future research topics
Settlement distribution Population studies Regional difference Rural landscape and settlement Towns Infrastructure Economy Ritual and religion Finds studies Danish occupation Unpublished excavations
13
Bronze Age
Assessment of key projects Assessment of progress on topics proposed in 2000 20 Future research topics
15 20
Iron Age
National overview Assessment of key projects
Landscape and settlement Finds
22 22 22
26 Medieval
- Late Iron Age/Roman transition
- 26 National overview
- 60
60 60 62 62 64 67 68 68
Assessment of progress on topics proposed in 2000 28 Assessment of key projects Future research topics
Dating and chronology
29 29 29 30 30 31 31
Landscapes Castles Urban Rural settlement Industry Finds
Bronze Age/Iron Age transition Finds studies Manufacturing and industry Iron Age/Roman transition
- Settlement types
- Building studies
The agrarian economy Social organisation Regional difference, tribal polities
31 Assessment of progress on topics proposed in 2000 69
- 31 Future research topics
- 70
70 70 70 70 71 71 71
- 32
- Landscapes
Rural settlement Towns
Roman
Built environment Infrastructure Industry
National overview Assessment of key projects
Rural landscapes Towns
33 33 33 37 39
Demographics
Military Industrial Infrastructure Ritual and burials Roman/Saxon transition
40 Post-Medieval and Modern
- 41 Assessment of key projects
- 72
72 73 74 75 76
42 44
Landscapes Urban
- Assessment of progress on topics proposed in 2000 44
- Industrial
Parks and gardens Military
Future research topics
Regional difference Romanisation
47 47 47 Assessment of progress on topics proposed in 2000 77
Rural landscapes and settlements Towns Ritual and religion Infrastructure
- 47 Future research topics
- 78
78 78 79
47 48 48
Built environment Industry and infrastructure Landscape
v
Towns Military
79 80
Over-Arching Research Themes and Strategy
Chronologies and processes of change Landscape and environment
84 84 85 87 88 89
Marine
Wetland
81 Urban 81 Methodologies 82 Dissemination and outreach
National overview Assessment of key projects Research themes
Bibliography Index, by Sue Vaughan
90
102
Acknowledgments
It is not possible to thank individually the many people gratefully acknowledged. However a few people should who have contributed to this volume as it represents all be singled out for specific thanks, Nigel Brown for his those who contributed information, comments and invaluable assistance during the process of compiling thoughts by e-mails, letter, workshop attendance and everyone’s contributions and comments and David commenting on the draft text, their contribution is Gurney and Jenny Glazebrook who edited the draft text.
Abbreviations
- ALGAO
- AssociationofLocalGovernment IHBC
ArchaeologicalOfficers kyBP
Aggregates LevySustainability Fund LIDAR BritishMarineAggregatesProducers MIS
Institute of Historic Building Conservation kilo(thousand) yearsBefore Present
- Light Detection andRanging
- ALSF
- BMAPA
- Marine Isotope Stage
Association
CouncilforBritishArchaeology MSRG
ChannelTunnel Rail Link OSL
- NMP
- NationalMapping Programme
Medieval Settlements Research Group Optical Luminescence Spectrometry
Portable AntiquitiesScheme
CBA CTRL
- EH
- English Heritage PAS
EIA EUS GIS HELM HER HLC
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment RCZAS
ExtendedUrban Survey RSPB
GeographicalInformation System SAM
HistoricEnvironmentLocalManagement SFB
HistoricEnvironment Record SSSI
HistoricLandscapeCharacterisation UAD
Rapid Coastal Zone AssessmentSurvey RoyalSociety for the Protection of Birds
Scheduled Ancient Monument
Sunken-featuredbuilding
Site of Special Scientific Interest Urban ArchaeologicalDatabase
Summary
This review of Research and Archaeology augments the eastern counties framework was never intended to be a regional research framework, which appeared in two parts fixed point but rather a dynamic process through which the as a Resource Assessment (Glazebrook ed. 1997); and a region’s archaeology can be influenced, and subject to Research Agenda and Strategy (Brown and Glazebrook periodic review and revision. Therefore it is intended that eds 2000). The review considers the new evidence on a the on-line document (at www.eaareports.org.uk) will be period-by-period basis, subdivided within in each period kept live and updated and augmented by the historic into an assessment of key projects undertaken since 2000, environment community of the East of England as new an assessment of progress on research topics proposed in discoveries are made and new research priorities 2000 and a consideration of future research topics. The established.
vi
Résumé
Cette critique de Research and Archaeology élargit le question de considérer le cadre des comtés de l’est comme cadre de la recherche régionale; il se compose de deux un point fixe mais plutôt comme un processus dynamique, parties: Resource Assessment (Glazebrook ed. 1997) et soumis à des critiques et des révisions périodiques, et Research Agenda and Strategy (Brown et Glazebrook eds capable d’influencer l’archéologie de la région. C’est 2000). Cette critique porte sur les nouvelles preuves pourquoi il est prévu que la communauté de l’environenvisagées selon les différentes périodes où elles ont été nement historique de l’East of England mette à jour et mises à jour. Chaque période est subdivisée afin de enrichisse le document en ligne (à l’adresse www. dégager une évaluation des principaux projets entrepris eaareports.org.uk) car de nouvelles découvertes sont faites depuis 2000, une évaluation des progrès réalisés sur le et de nouvelles priorités de recherche sont établies. plan des sujets de recherche proposés en 2000, et un examen des futurs sujets de recherche. Il n’a jamais été (Traduction: Didier Don)
Zusammenfassung
Die Abhandlung Research and Archaeology ist ein gedacht, sondern wurde als dynamischer Prozess Beitrag zum regionalen Forschungsrahmen, der bislang in begriffen, der die Archäologie der Region beeinflussen zwei Teilen als Resource Assessment (Hg. Glazebrook, kann und regelmäßig überprüft werden sollte. Es ist daher 1997) und Research Agenda and Strategy (Hg. Brown und geplant, das Online-Dokument (siehe www.eaareports. Glazebrook, 2000) vorliegt. Die Abhandlung stellt die org.uk) fortlaufend von der Forschungsgemeinschaft, die neuen Befunde, aufgegliedert nach Perioden, dar, wobei das historische Umfeld von Ostengland untersucht, für jede Periode folgende Angaben gemacht werden: aktualisieren und erweitern zu lassen, sobald neue Bewertung der wichtigsten seit 2000 durchgeführten Entdeckungen gemacht und neue Forschungsschwerpunkte Projekte, Bewertung der Fortschritte bei den im Jahr 2000 definiert werden. vorgeschlagenen Forschungsthemen und Überlegungen zu künftigen Forschungsthemen. Die Übersicht nach Grafschaften in Ostengland war nie als starrer Rahmen (Übersetzung: Gerlinde Krug)
vii
Research and Archaeology Revisited:
viii
a revised framework for the East of England
Introduction
A research framework, as defined by Thomas (1994) and Olivier (1996), comprises: absolute dating programmes (e.g. advanced AMS dating project, the application of Bayesian modelling to radiocarbon dating) planning initiatives of HELM (sense of place etc). A series of studies has been undertaken on the
••
Resource assessment: the current state of knowledge and understanding. Research agenda: gaps in knowledge, potential of resource, research topics.
Research strategy: priorities and methods for
implementing the agenda. application of evaluation methodologies (Hey and Lacey 2001; Medlycott 2005; Saunders in Andrikopolou-Strack 2006) and Environmental Impact Assessments (Lambrick and Hind 2005).
This review of Research and Archaeology augments
the regional research framework, rather than replacing it. The framework was developed for the eastern counties by a process begun in the mid 1990s and led by a group of county archaeologists. The process started so early it omitted Bedfordshire, a county brought into the new East of England region in 1998. The framework was amongst the first to be published (only that for the Greater Thames Estuary being comparably early (Williams and Brown 1999). It appeared in two parts: a Resource Assessment (Glazebrook ed. 1997); and a Research Agenda and Strategy (Brown and Glazebrook eds 2000).
The eastern counties research framework is one of a group of such frameworks, with other examples from the South-east of England, the Thames and the Solent, the Greater Thames, Greater London, the North-East and the North-west of England. Bedfordshire has independently produceditsownresearchframework(Oake e t a l. 2007).
The eastern counties framework was never intended to be a fixed point but rather a dynamic process through which the region’s archaeology can be influenced, and subject to periodic review and revision. In 2004, a conference held in Ipswich started the review process for the East of England. Papers were presented on selected themes designed to reflect some of the key results of research projects and threat-led investigations since publication of the framework. This conference was organised and funded by the members of ALGAOEE with the support of a grant from English Heritage. Papers from the conference, including an introductory paper based on the notes of three keynote speakers, have been released online at www.eaareports.org.uk.
The East of England has enormous research potential.
For example, the nature of the region’s geography and topography means that it is at the forefront of Palaeolithic studies in Britain. The region is probably one of the best places to consider the origins and development of agriculture, whether its inception and adoption in the Neolithic and Bronze Age, or the post-medieval developments of the Agricultural Revolution. AngloSaxon archaeology is also of particular significance, including the presence of at least two royal burial grounds at Sutton Hoo and Prittlewell. The region has more market towns than any other English region and is well-placed to study the origins and developments of urban life. The East of England has witnessed a number of influential research projects in landscape history, which have included archaeology as one of the chief sources of evidence along with research on physical geography, archival research, place-names, botany and other fields of investigation.
A revised research agenda and strategy is particularly imperative at this time, given the numerous development pressures on the East of England. These include implementation of the Sustainable Communities Plan, (including Thames Gateway, Milton Keynes and the M11/ Stansted/Cambridge/ Peterborough Growth areas), issues arising from the Regional Spatial Strategy including the recently designated New Growth Points of Norwich, Thetford, and Haven Gateway. Also of significance in the East of England are issues of countryside renewal, integrated coastal zone management and flood-risk management, both in river catchments and around the coast.
The East of England includes the counties of Essex,
Suffolk, Norfolk, Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire and the Unitary Authorities of Thurrock, Southend-on-Sea, Peterborough, Bedford and Luton. The constituency for this revision comprised ALGAO East of England, English Heritage, the IHBC, museum professionals, selected academic institutions and individuals, the regional CBA groups, and regional contractors and Period and Local Societies. These formed the Consultee list for the project.
This review has been compiled from information submitted by the Consultees, supplemented by the results of the two Workshops held to discuss over-arching thematic trends and issues. The Key Projects have been identified for their perceived importance in addressing regional research issues or in pushing forward our current understanding of the region’s historic environment. They include threat-led investigations, research projects and
There have been a number of significant national and regional initiatives over the last 10 years, and their contribution to the understanding of the historic environment will be clearly seen in the following chapters. They include: the National Mapping Programme of aerial photographs
•
the Portable Antiquities Scheme digitisation of Historic Environment Records (Heritage Gateway)
••
Urban Archaeological Databases Extensive Urban Surveys Historic Landscape Characterisation
••••
the impact of the ALSF and Mineral Aggregate initiatives on understanding the Palaeolithic Coastal Surveys
•
1
Research and Archaeology Revisited:
community projects. The thematic chapters are each research themes identified in the original Research divided into three parts. First the results of the last 10 years Agenda and Strategy have been addressed is reviewed. of fieldwork, research and survey are collated and Thirdly, new or amended research themes are proposed. considered. Secondly, the extent to which the specific
2
a revised framework for the East of England
Palaeolithic and Mesolithic
- National overview
- Assessment of key projects
The Research and Conservation Framework for the The Middle Thames Tributaries project utilised existing
British Palaeolithic has been published by English (non-archaeological) borehole data and geological Heritage and the Prehistoric Society (Pettitt, Gamble and mapping to create geoarchaeological GIS layers for the Last 2008). A research and management framework is Lower Lea and Ver valleys. The available data in the Lea being prepared for North Sea Prehistory (Peeters Valley enabled nineteen zones to be identified, with their forthcoming), this will cover the submerged land area sediments, age, likely archaeology recorded, as well as
- beneath the southern North Sea.
- where peat or palaeoenvironmental data might be found.
Following the successful results of The English Rivers The data in the Ver valley was not sufficient to enable the
Palaeolithic Survey (Wessex Archaeology 1995–6) a same level of geoarchaeological modelling to be created, considerable body of very useful work has been although some general observations could be made. In undertaken. However, this has largely improved our both study areas the extents of quarrying have been understanding of the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic, plotted, demonstrating the diminishing nature of the rather than the Upper Palaeolithic or the Mesolithic. The resource in these areas. majority of the large-scale synthetic projects have been financed by the ALSF, with the smaller projects being Wymer and Wessex Archaeology (1998a and b), surveyed research or development-led. all recorded Lower and Middle Palaeolithic discoveries —
National projects include The Colonisation of Britain Suffolk is covered in Reports No. 3 and 11.
The English Rivers Palaeolithic Project, by John
- by Modern Humans (Wessex Archaeology), which aimed
- A research framework has been developed for the
to collate and synthesise existing sources of data on the Medway Valley gravels in Kent and Essex (Wenban-Smith Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic, the primary data source et al. 2007), which provides characterisation and being the extensive archive of Dr Roger Jacobi. This, and predictive modelling of the Pleistocene/Palaeolithic other data, has been used to create a national database/GIS resource. The Medway Valley project interpretations have of sites and findspots for these periods, known as PaMela. been supported by fieldwork, including the identification Wessex Archaeology are also undertaking a project to of a flake from the Westcliffe High School for Girls, secure the long-term survival of the J.J. Wymer archive, this Essex, which may represent the second oldest site in the includes his card index of every known Lower and Middle country. The Medway Valley project has also provided Palaeolithic artefact from Britain, and his field note books specifications for appropriate evaluation/excavation dating from c.1949 to 2005.
The Ancient Human Occupation of Britain (AHOB) is Development Control officers when the occasion arises. a partnership between a wide range of organisations and The Wash River project aimed to characterise the methodologies which can be used or adapted by specialists. Areas of research include the earliest known archaeological materials from the gravels of the occupation of the British Isles (see Happisburgh below), Washland Rivers of Cambridgeshire, that is the Cam, human habitats in the Hoxnian, the Middle Palaeolithic Nene, Granta and Ouse, in order to update the HER and
- and desertedBritain, repopulationinthelatePleistocene.
- inform archaeological advice related to mineral extraction
The Portable Antiquities Scheme has provided an Further work has been undertaken on the Palaeolithic opportunity for the chance recovery of flint artefacts to be resource at Caddington, Gaddesden Row, Barnham, recorded. 122 Palaeolithic and 1427 Mesolithic artefacts Elveden (Ashton et al. 1999), Santon Downham, High
- havebeenrecorded bythismeansbetween1997and2007).
- Lodge, Foxhall Road, and Hoxne. Both studies include
strategy documents.
Reconstruction drawing courtesy of the Ancient History of Britain Project / John Sibbick
3
Research and Archaeology Revisited:
- PROJECT
- LOCATION
- AUTHORITY
- TYPE
- COMMENTS