Boiler Operator Study Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Clayton-02 A2
QTY. PART NUMBER QTY. PART NUMBER QTY. PART NUMBER QTY. PART NUMBER 1 CLAYTON-UF-1-01-LH SIDE BEAM 1 CLAYTON-BR-3-01-BOILER SHELL 1 CLAYTON-RG-5-01-LH-CRANKCASE SIDE 1 CLAYTON-MP-6-31-CRANKSHAFT CHAIN SPROCKET 1 CLAYTON-UF-1-02-RH SIDE BEAM 1 CLAYTON-BR-3-02-BOILER FOUNDATION RING 1 CLAYTON-RG-5-02-RH-CRANKCASE SIDE 1 CLAYTON-MP-6-32-LUBRICATOR CRANK RING 1 CLAYTON-UF-1-03-FRONT CROSS BEAM 1 CLAYTON-BR-3-03-BOILER FIRE BOX 2 CLAYTON-RG-5-03-CRANKSHAFT BEARING HOUSING 1 CLAYTON-MP-6-33-LUBRICATOR CRANK PIN 2 CLAYTON-UF-1-04-CROSS BEAM-1 1 CLAYTON-BR-3-04-BOILER CLINKERING 2 CLAYTON-RG-5-04-CRANKSHAFT BEARING 1 CLAYTON-MP-6-34-REVERSER ENGINE CRANK 1 CLAYTON-UF-1-05-CROSS BEAM-2 5 CLAYTON-BR-3-05-BOILER BUSH TYPE-A 2 CLAYTON-RG-5-05-CRANKSHAFT BEARING CAP 1 CLAYTON-MP-6-35-REVERSER LINK ROD 2 CLAYTON-UF-1-05-CROSS BEAM-2 3 CLAYTON-BR-3-06-BOILER BUSH TYPE-B 1 CLAYTON-RG-5-06-CRANKCASE OIL FILLER BOSS 2 CLAYTON-MP-6-36-REVERSER LINK ROD END 1 CLAYTON-UF-1-06-CROSS BEAM-2 LH-MOUNTING BRACKET 4 CLAYTON-BR-3-07-BOILER MOUINTING BRACKET 1 CLAYTON-RG-5-07-CRANKCASE OIL FILLER CAP 1 CLAYTON-MP-6-37A-LUBRICATOR CRANK ARM ROD 1 CLAYTON-UF-1-07-CROSS BEAM-2 RH-MOUNTING BRACKET 1 CLAYTON-BR-3-08-BOILER DOOR HINGE BRACKET 1 CLAYTON-RG-5-08-CRANKCASE FRONT 1 CLAYTON-MP-6-37B-LUBRICATOR CRANK ARM ROD END-1 2 CLAYTON-UF-1-08-FRONT BEAM ANGLE 1 CLAYTON-BR-3-09-BOILER CLINKER DOOR 1 CLAYTON-RG-5-09-CRANKCASE BOLTING FLANGE 1 CLAYTON-MP-6-37C-LUBRICATOR CRANK ARM ROD END-2 2 CLAYTON-UF-1-09-MID BEAM SUPPORT ANGLE 1 CLAYTON-BR-3-10-BOILER CLINKER DOOR HINGE -
The River Steam Boat: a Ticking Time Bomb out of the Experience of The
The River Steam Boat: A Ticking Time Bomb Out of the experience of the early years of the river steam boat, there emerged two architectures of steam-engine design and building. The first and for some years the predominant one was that provided by Boulton and Watt, with their low-pressure condensing steam engine. This was the architecture followed by Robert Fulton with his early success on the Hudson estuary. However, it was less than a decade after Fulton’s successful trip up the Hudson that steam engines based on designs using high pressure steam began to evolve. The result was largely to reshape the pattern of steamboat design and virtually eliminate the earlier low-pressure practices of Fulton, Boulton and Watt. The development of the high-pressure steam engine with its attendant steam boiler was governed almost entirely by practical considerations. The advantages of the simple, compact, low-cost high pressure engine over the low-pressure engine with its complicated condensing apparatus, greater size and weight, and heavy requirements of condensing water were clearly apparent and appropriate to American conditions. These conditions were (1) scarcity of capital and skilled labor, (2) scarcity of repair facilities and (3) limited scale of operation. All of these conditions, at one time or another, contributed to the fateful disasters that followed. Although explosions were by no means confined to boilers generating steam at high pressure, it was with this class of boiler that this type of operating hazard appeared in its most destructive and spectacular form. Every high-pressure boiler was in operation a storehouse of concentrated energy in the form of water and steam at high temperature confined under pressures ranging from 30 to 150 psi [i.e., pounds per square inch] and upward. -
QUIZ: Boiler System Components
9707 Key West Avenue, Suite 100 Rockville, MD 20850 Phone: 301-740-1421 Fax: 301-990-9771 E-Mail: [email protected] Part of the recertification process is to obtain Continuing Education Units (CEUs). One way to do that is to review a technical article and complete a short quiz. Scoring an 80% or better will grant you 0.5 CEUs. You need 25 CEUs over a 5-year period to be recertified. The quiz and article are posted below. Completed tests can be faxed (301-990-9771) or mailed (9707 Key West Avenue, Suite 100, Rockville, MD 20850) to AWT. Quizzes will be scored within 2 weeks of their receipt and you will be notified of the results. Name: ______________________________________________ Company: ___________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________ City: ______________________ State: _____ Zip: ________ Phone: ______________________ Fax: __________________ E-mail: _____________________________________________ Boiler Systems – Boiler Components By Irvin J. Cotton, Arthur Freedman Associates, Inc. and Orin Hollander, Holland Technologies, Inc. This is part two of a three-part series on boilers. In part one, the authors discussed boiler design and classification. Part two will discuss boiler components, and part three will describe the various chemistries used in boiler water treatment. Boiler Components The main components in a boiler system are the boiler feedwater heaters, deaerator, boiler, feed pump, economizer, boiler, superheater, attemperator, steam system, condenser and the condensate pump. In addition there are sets of controls to monitor water and steam flow, fuel flow, airflow and chemical treatment additions. Water sample points may exist at a number of places. Most typically the condensate, deaerator outlet, feedwater (often the economizer inlet), boiler, saturated steam and superheated steam will have sample points. -
Accident Investigation Reports Under the Locomotive Inspection Act of February 17, 1911, As Amended
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION REPORT NO. 3309 IN THE MATTER OF MAKING- ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORTS UNDER THE LOCOMOTIVE INSPECTION ACT OF FEBRUARY 17, 1911, AS AMENDED ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD March 27, 1950 Accident (boiler explosion) near Tarboro, N. C., on February 24, 1950, caused by overheating of the crown sheet due to low water. REPORT OF THE COMMISSION PATTERSON, Commissioner: On February 24, 1950, about 6:09 p.m., near Tarboro, N. C., the boiler of Atlantic Coast Line Railroad locomotive 411 ex ploded while the locomotive was hauling a freight train at an estimated speed of 20 miles per hour. The engineer, fireman and brakeman were killed. Under authority of section 17 (2) of the Interstate Commerce Act the above-entitled proceeding was referred by the Commission to Commissioner Patterson for consideration and disposition. - 1 - DESCRIPTION OF ACCIDENT Atlantic Coast Line Railroad locomotive 411 departed from South Rocky Mount, N. C, February 24, 1950, at 9r30 a.m., on local freight run known as the Williamston Turn. The run to Vjilliamston, N= C. , a distance of 47 miles, was made without any known unusual incident and the locomotive departed at 3:50 p.m., hauling southbound extra freight train No 411 en route to South Rocky Mount. The train departed from Tarboro, N. C., at 5.57 p.m. and, at about 6:09 p0me, when about 2 miles south of Tarboro, approximately 33 miles from Williams- ton, the boiler of the locomotive exploded iijhile the train was running at an estimated speed of 20 miles per hour. The en gineer, fireman, and brakeman were killed. -
BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:14 Page 1
BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:14 Page 1 BRITAIN‘S LEADING HISTORICAL RAILWAY JOURNAL VOLUME 22 • NUMBER 1 • JANUARY 2008 • £3.60 IN THIS ISSUE 150 YEARS OF THE SOMERSET & DORSET RAILWAY GWR RAILCARS IN COLOUR THE NORTH CORNWALL LINE THE FURNESS LINE IN COLOUR PENDRAGON BRITISH ENGLISH-ELECTRIC MANUFACTURERS PUBLISHING THE GWR EXPRESS 4-4-0 CLASSES THE COMPREHENSIVE VOICE OF RAILWAY HISTORY BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 15:59 Page 64 THE COMPREHENSIVE VOICE OF RAILWAY HISTORY END OF THE YEAR AT ASHBY JUNCTION A light snowfall lends a crisp feel to this view at Ashby Junction, just north of Nuneaton, on 29th December 1962. Two LMS 4-6-0s, Class 5 No.45058 piloting ‘Jubilee’ No.45592 Indore, whisk the late-running Heysham–London Euston ‘Ulster Express’ past the signal box in a flurry of steam, while 8F 2-8-0 No.48349 waits to bring a freight off the Ashby & Nuneaton line. As the year draws to a close, steam can ponder upon the inexorable march south of the West Coast Main Line electrification. (Tommy Tomalin) PENDRAGON PUBLISHING www.pendragonpublishing.co.uk BACKTRACK 22-1 2008:Layout 1 21/11/07 14:17 Page 4 SOUTHERN GONE WEST A busy scene at Halwill Junction on 31st August 1964. BR Class 4 4-6-0 No.75022 is approaching with the 8.48am from Padstow, THE NORTH CORNWALL while Class 4 2-6-4T No.80037 waits to shape of the ancient Bodmin & Wadebridge proceed with the 10.00 Okehampton–Padstow. -
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2
May 8, 2019 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 SUBJECT: NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 – INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000220/2019001 AND 05000410/2019001 Dear Mr. Hanson: On March 31, 2019, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2. On April 25, 2019 the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. Peter Orphanos and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report. NRC inspectors documented three findings of very low safety significance (Green) in this report. Two of these findings involved violations of NRC requirements. The NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy. If you contest the violations or significance or severity of the violations documented in this inspection report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC resident inspector at Nine Mile Point. In addition, if you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment or a finding not associated with a regulatory requirement in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. -
Union Pacific No. 119
Union Pacific No. 119 Operating Manual Developed by Smokebox for Dovetail Games' Train Simulator 2018TM © Smokebox 2018, all rights reserved Issue 1 Train Simulator - Union Pacific No. 119 - Operating Manual Page 2 Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Locomotive Technical Specifications................................................................................................................. 4 Positions of the Controls and Gauges in the Cab .............................................................................................. 5 Key Assignments................................................................................................................................................ 9 Animations....................................................................................................................................................... 12 Lights................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Sanding ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 Particle Effects................................................................................................................................................. 14 Other Special Effects ...................................................................................................................................... -
Preliminary Evaluation of a Compound Cycle Engine for Shipboard Gensets
U.S. Navy DTNSRDC-PASD-CR-1886 U.S. Army AVSCOM TR-86-C-20 NASA CR-179451 PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF A COMPOUND CYCLE ENGINE FOR SHIPBOARD GENSETS June 1986 (NASA-CB-179451) PHEIIMINASY EVALUATION OF N86-26629 A COHPOUND CYCLE ENGINE FOE SHIEECAED GENSETS (Garrett Turbine Engine Co.) 29 p HC A03/MF A01 CSCL 131 Dnclas G3/37 43436 Jere G. Castor Garrett Turbine Engine Co. 111 S. 34th Street Phoenix, AZ 85010 William T. Wintucky NASA-Lewis Research Center 21000 Brookpark Rd. Cleveland, OH 44135 Contract NAS3-24346 21-5869 Prepared for David Taylor Naval Ship R&D Center Annapolis, MD 21402 1. Report NO. OINSRDC-PASD-CR-1886 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. AVSCOM TR-86-C-20 NASA CR-179451 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Preliminary Evaluation of a Compound Cycle June 1986 Engine for Shipboard Gensats 6. Performing Organization Code f- Authors) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jere G. Castor Garrett Turbine Engine Co. Garrett 21-5869 William T. Wintucky 10. Work Unit No. NASA Lewis Research Center 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Garrett Turbine Engine Co. 11. Contract or Grant No. Ill S. 34th Street MAS 3-24346 P.O. Box 52170 Mn 13. Type of Report and Period Covered sr A7. 85010 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Contractor Report David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center 14. Sponsoring Agenc^&MWork Jiiemen Engines Branch, Code 2721 PE6254 3N Annapolis, MD 21402 Task Area SF43-432 15. Supplementary Notes Program Manager - Propulsion Directorate U.S. -
Circulatic Steam Generator Installation Manual
STEAM GENERATORS CIRCULATIC® STEAM GENERATORS INSTALLATION MANUAL VAPOR POWER INTERNATIONAL 551 S. County Line Rd. Franklin Park, IL 60131 P: 630.694.5500 F: 630.694.2230 VaporPower.com Revised July 2005 Bulletin No. Printed in U.S.A. TWM5-AM-2 CIRCULATIC TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. List of Figures ..................................................................................................................2 List of Tables ...................................................................................................................2 1.0 Introduction .....................................................................................................................3 2.0 Lifting and Handling .........................................................................................................4 3.0 Installation .......................................................................................................................8 4.0 Mounting .........................................................................................................................9 5.0 Clearances .................................................................................................................... 10 6.0 Combustion and Ventilation Air Requirements ............................................................... 12 7.0 Stack Installation ........................................................................................................... 13 8.0 Steam Output ............................................................................................................... -
THESIS WASTE HEAT RECOVERY from a HIGH TEMPERATURE DIESEL ENGINE Submitted by Jonas E. Adler Department of Mechanical Engineerin
THESIS WASTE HEAT RECOVERY FROM A HIGH TEMPERATURE DIESEL ENGINE Submitted by Jonas E. Adler Department of Mechanical Engineering In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2017 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Todd M. Bandhauer Daniel B. Olsen Sybil E. Sharvelle Copyright by Jonas E. Adler 2017 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT WASTE HEAT RECOVERY FROM A HIGH TEMPERATURE DIESEL ENGINE Government-mandated improvements in fuel economy and emissions from internal combustion engines (ICEs) are driving innovation in engine efficiency. Though incremental efficiency gains have been achieved, most combustion engines are still only 30-40% efficient at best, with most of the remaining fuel energy being rejected to the environment as waste heat through engine coolant and exhaust gases. Attempts have been made to harness this waste heat and use it to drive a Rankine cycle and produce additional work to improve efficiency. Research on waste heat recovery (WHR) demonstrates that it is possible to improve overall efficiency by converting wasted heat into usable work, but relative gains in overall efficiency are typically minimal (~5-8%) and often do not justify the cost and space requirements of a WHR system. The primary limitation of the current state-of-the-art in WHR is the low temperature of the engine coolant (~90°C), which minimizes the WHR from a heat source that represents between 20% and 30% of the fuel energy. The current research proposes increasing the engine coolant temperature to improve the utilization of coolant waste heat as one possible path to achieving greater WHR system effectiveness. -
Hurst Boiler & Welding Company, Inc
Hurst Boiler & Welding Company, Inc. P.O. Drawer 530 - Highway 319 North Coolidge, Georgia 31738 877-99HURST – Toll Free 229-346-3545 – Local 229-346-3874 – Fax www.hurstboiler.com SERIES 45 STEAM BOILER (8.5- 813 HP, STEAM 15 psig) SAMPLE SPECIFICATIONS The following sample specifications are provided by Hurst Boiler & Welding Co., Inc. to assist you in meeting your customer's specific needs and application. The sample specifications are typically utilized as the base template for the complete boiler specification. Contact your local Hurst Boiler & Welding Co., Inc. authorized representative for information on special insurance requirements, special code requirements, optional equipment, or general assistance in completing the specification. 1.0 – General Boiler Specifications 1.1 - The Steam Boiler shall be Hurst Boiler & Welding Co., Inc. Series 45, hp designed for 15 psig. The maximum operating pressure shall be psig and the minimum operating pressure shall be psig. 1.2 - The boiler shall have a maximum output of Btu/hr, or horsepower when fired with oil and/or natural gas, Btu/cu-ft. Electrical power available shall be Volt Phase Cycle. 2.0 – Boiler Design 2.1 - The boiler shall be a three-pass wetback horizontal firebox type boiler with four (4) square feet of fireside heating surface per rated boiler horsepower. Furnace volume shall not be less than cubic feet. It shall be mounted on a heavy steel frame with integral forced draft burner and burner controls. The complete packaged boiler approved as a unit by Underwriters Laboratories and shall bear the UL label. 2.2 - The boiler shall be completely preassembled and tested at the factory. -
Oil Fuel and the Empire
OIL FUEL AND THE EMPIRE jf' D. HENRY FOUNDER OF " THJE PETROLEUU WORLD " AND AUTHOR OF 'BAKU; AN EVENTFUL HISTORY," " THIRTY-FIVE YEARS OF OIL TRANSPORT; THE EVOLUTION OF THE TANK STEAMER," ETC HALF-TONE ILLUSTRATIONS, DIAGRAMS AND ORIGINAL DRAWINGS Printed by BRADBURY, AGNEW, & CO. LD. LONDON AND TONBRIDGE And Published at 22-23, Great Tower Street, London, E.C. 1908 IT /"i^pz:. Printed by ^ P" Bradbury, Agnew &. Co. Ld. London and Tonbridge. poelished at 22 & 23, Great Tower Street, London, E.C. Bl July, 1908. TO THE OIL MEN OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA WHO MADE THE FIRST OFFER TO S0PPLY COLONIAL OIL FUEL TO THE BRITISH NAVY ^ £IQUID fuel is already substituted for coal in many steam- ships. When sufficient quantities can ,be obtained it has many obvious advantages over coal. At present it does not appear that adequate supplies are available. Competent authori- ties, here and abroad, are giving attention to this question, and to the development of supplies. If the want can be met at prices justifying the use of liquid fuel there will undoubtedly be a movement in that direction." Sir William H. White, Chief Constructor at the Admiralty, in 1899. Thomas Gibson Bowles, in a lively letter to Tke Times, mR.in 1900, hit the Admiralty hard for reducing " a fleet-in- being to a fleet in building," and denounced " the persis- tent refusal seriously to entertain or examine the matter of oil fuel." In July, 1904, Mr. Bowles asked whether the oil fuel experi- ments in warships had been satisfactory. Oil, he added, would carry a ship twice the distance coal would, but he doubted whether we could get a sufficient supply.