DOCSLIB.ORG

Religious Hollidays

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Religious Hollidays saqarTvelos erovnuli Georgian National muzeumi Museum www.museum.ge ebrauli kulturuli memkvidreoba facebook.com/GNMuseum saqarTvelos erovnuli muzeumis koleqciebSi Jewish Cultural Heritage in the Collections of Georgian National Museum religiuri dResaswaulebi S. koboSvili. misionerebis kurTxeva (suqoTis dResaswauli). 1939 Sh. Koboshvili. The Prayer of the Missionaries (Feast of Sukkot ). 1939 Religious Hollidays S. koboSvili. frinvelis dakvlaa religiuri wesiT. 1939 Sh. Koboshvili. Slaughtering Poultry According to Religious Rules. 1939 d. gvelesiani. hagada. fesaxis Rame. 1936 D. Gvelesiani. Hagada – Pesach Night. 1936 d. gvelesiani. xanuqis sanTlebis kurTxeva. 1936 D. Gvelesiani. Lightening of Khanuha Candles. 1936 Tbilisi 2015 Tbilisi S. koboSvili. saritualo daniSnulebis oTaxi. 1938 Sh. Koboshvili. Peasant’s room for ritual purposing. 1938 saqarTveloSi ebraeli xalxis istoria aTaswleulebs iTvlis. „qarTlis seferTora. XIX s. cxovrebis“ cnobiT, ebraelTa pirveli migracia da maTi mcxeTaSi damkv- Torah Scroll. 19th C. idreba Zv. w. VI saukuniT TariRdeba. SemdgomSic ar Semwydara ebraelTa migracia da maTi dasaxleba saqarTvelos sxvadasxva kuTxeSi. miuxedavad Tanamdevi asimilaciisa, qarTvelma ebraelobam saukuneeb- is manZilze SeinarCuna sakuTari religia, tradiciebi da TviTmyofadi kultura. saqarTvelos ebraelTa istoriul-eTnografiuli muzeumi TbilisSi 1933-1951 wlebSi funqcionirebda. saqarTveloSi ebraelTa kulturisa da yofis amsaxveli samuzeumo koleqcia regionaluri samecniero-eT- nografiuli eqspediciebis safuZvelze Segrovda. aq warmodgenilia eTnografiuli, religiuri Tu ritualuri daniSnulebis nivTebi, xel- nawerebi, samosi, qsovilebi, aqsesuarebi, aseve ferweruli da grafi- kuli namuSevrebi, romlebic 1930-ian wlebSi muzeumisTvis sagangebod Seiqmna. Salom koboSvilisa (1876-1941) da daviT gvelesianis (1890-1949) namuSevrebSi gansakuTrebiT sainteresod da xatovnadaa gadmocemuli qarTvel ebraelTa cxovreba. 1951 wels, muzeumi daixura, rogorc sionizmis kera, xolo sinagogis Seno- Tora-Sildi. ebrauli religiuri kalendari. XIX s. bis konfiskaciis Semdgom, koleqciebi gadanawilda sxvadasxva muzeumSi, paroxeti - seferToris karadis farda. XVIII s. paroxeti - seferToris karadis farda. XIX s. Torah-Shield. Jewish religious calendar. 19th C. th th sadac es eqsponatebi dRemdea daculi. 2014 wels aRdgenil daviT baazovis Parokhet. Torah Ark curtain. 18 c. Parokhet. Torah Ark curtain. 19 c. ebraelTa istoriis muzeumis eqspoziciaSi am koleqciis nawilia gamofenili. saukuneebis manZilze, diasporaSi cxovrebisas, ebraelobam sakuTari identoba religiis meSveobiT SeinarCuna. ebraelebi Toras “jibis sam- Toris saCvenebeli. XIX s. th Soblos” uwodebdnen, xolo sinagoga ara mxolod taZari da kultmsax- Torah Pointer. 19 C. urebis adgili, aramed TavSeyris adgilic da saganmanaTleblo kerac iyo. religiuri dResaswaulebis aRniSvna gansakuTrebul datvirTvasa da mniSvnelobas iZens samSoblodakarguli erisTvis da RmerTTan, is- toriul, aRTqmul miwasTan mis uwyvet kavSirze miuTiTebs. Ees tradicia Taobidan Taobas saTuTad gadaecemoda, rac gulisxmobda ritualuri wesebis dacvas ara mxolod sinagogaSi, aramed ojaxebSic. iudaizmis Taviseburebidan gamomdinare, ebrauli kultura da xelovneba ufro ceremonialur-sakulto xasiaTs atarebda da amitomac, dekoratiuli xelovneba maRal doneze iyo ganviTarebuli. History of Jewish people in Georgia commenced thousands of years ago. According to “Kartlis Tskhovreba” (Life of Kartli), a collection of Georgian chronicles, compiled in the Mid- dle Ages, the first migration of Jews and their settling in Mtskheta was in the 6th century BC. Later migration of the Jews to Georgia has taken place several times and they settled in different regions. Irrespective of certain assimilation, Georgian Jews have maintained their religion, tradi- tions and originality for many centuries. seferToris gvirgvinebi. XIX s. rimonimi - seferToris gvirgvini. XIX s. Historical-ethnographic museum of Georgian Jews operated in Georgia in 1933-51 peri- Torah Scroll’s Crowns. 19th C. Rimmonim – Finial of Torah-Scroll. 19th C. S. koboSvili. seferToris gamotana sinagogaSi. 1939 od. Its collection was created on the basis of regional scientific-ethnographic expeditions. Sh. Koboshvili. Exposing The Torah scrolls in the Synagogue. 1939 Collection of the museum illustrates the culture and everyday life of the Jews in Georgia. It includes the ethnographic, religious, ritual items, manuscripts, garments, cloths, acces- sories, paintings and drawings depicting life of Georgian Jews by the artists Shalom Ko- boshvili (1876-1941) and David Gvelesiani (1890-1949) created especially for the museum rabinis beWedi. XIX s. th in 1930-ies. In 1951 the museum was closed as the center of Zionism and after seizure Rabbi’s seal. 19 C. (confiscation) of Synagogue building the collection was distributed (moved) to different museums and the exhibits are maintained (kept) there up to present. Part of these collec- tions is represented on the exhibition in the David Baazov museum of Jewish History after it’s re-establishment in 2014. Life in Diaspora during the centuries have maintained Jews identity relying on their religion. Jews named Torah “pocket mother land” and Synagogue is not only temple for praying but also the place of gathering and education center. Religious holidays have particular load and meaning for the people deprived of their mother land and indicates their permanent connection with the God and historical Promised Land. This tradition was transferred with great care from one generation to the other and includ- ed the rituals not only at the Synagogue but also at home. Given the specific charac- teristics of Judaism, Jewish culture and art was mostly of ceremonial-cult nature with highly developed decorative arts. sinagogis Sandali. XIX s. seferToris kaba. XIX s. Synagogue Lamp. 19th C. Covering of Torah scroll. 19th C. seferToris kaba. XIX s. Toris Sesanaxi bude. XIX s. Covering of Torah-Scroll. 19th C. Torah’s box. 19th C..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Submitted Under Article 9 of the Convention on 2 July 2014
    United Nations CERD/C/GEO/6-8 International Convention on Distr.: General 31 October 2014 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention Sixth to eighth periodic reports of States parties due in 2014 Georgia* [Date received: 2 July 2014] * The present document is being issued without formal editing. GE.14-19562 (E) CERD/C/GEO/6-8 Contents Paragraphs Page Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1–4 3 I. General ................................................................................................................ 5–90 3 A. General Framework for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights ....... 5–7 3 B. State policy towards integration of ethnic minorities ..................................... 8–31 4 C. Application of the Convention in the Occupied Territories of Georgia .......... 32–35 8 D. Human rights situation in occupied territories ................................................ 36–75 9 E. Engagement policy ......................................................................................... 76–90 16 II. Follow-up of Concluding Observations of the Committee (CERD/C/GEO/CO/4-5) ......................................................................................... 91–190 20 A. Reply to issues raised in paragraph 10 ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Situation in Human Rights and Freedoms in Georgia – 2011
    2011 The Public Defender of Georgia ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DefeNDER OF GeorgIA 1 The views of the publication do not necessarily represent those of the Council of Europe. The report was published with financial support of the Council of Europe project, “Denmark’s Georgia Programme 2010-2013, Promotion of Judicial Reform, Human and Minority Rights”. 2 www.ombudsman.ge ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GeorgIA THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN GEORGIA 2011 2011 THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GeorgIA ANNUAL REPORT OF THEwww.ombudsman.ge PUBLIC DefeNDER OF GeorgIA 3 OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA 6, Ramishvili str, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia Tel: +995 32 2913814; +995 32 2913815 Fax: +995 32 2913841 E-mail: [email protected] 4 www.ombudsman.ge CONTENTS INtrodUCTION ..........................................................................................................................7 JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND HUMAN RIGHTS ........................................................................11 THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL ........................................................................................11 ENFORCEMENT OF COUrt JUDGMENTS ...............................................................37 PUBLIC DEFENDER AND CONSTITUTIONAL OVERSIGHT ...........................41 LAW ENFORCEMENT BODIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS .......................................46 CIVIL-POLITICAL RIGHTS ..................................................................................................51 FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND MANIFESTATIONS ............................................51
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    YEREVAN STATE UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR CIVILIZATION AND CULTURAL STUDIES Analytical Bulletin № 8 Yerevan 2015 ԵՐԵՎԱՆԻ ՊԵՏԱԿԱՆ ՀԱՄԱԼՍԱՐԱՆ ՔԱՂԱՔԱԿՐԹԱԿԱՆ ԵՎ ՄՇԱԿՈՒԹԱՅԻՆ ՀԵՏԱԶՈՏՈՒԹՅՈՒՆՆԵՐԻ ԿԵՆՏՐՈՆ Վերլուծական տեղեկագիր № 8 Երևան – 2015 Published by Scientific council of Center for Civilization and Cultural Studies Editorial Board David Hovhannisyan Professor and Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Aram Simonyan Doctor Professor, Corresponding member of the Academy of Science of Armenia Ruben Safrastyan Doctor Professor, member of Academy of Science of Armenia Arman Kirakosyan Doctor Professor and Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Anna Ohanian PhD in Political Science (USA) Sergey Minasyan Doctor of Political Science Ketevan Khutsishvili PhD in Anthropology (Georgia) Hayk Kocharyan Dr. Associate Professor © Center for Civilization and Cultural Studies‚ 2015 © Yerevan State University‚ 2015 Հրատարակվում է ԵՊՀ Քաղաքակրթական և մշակութային հետազոտությունների կենտրոնի գիտական խորհրդի որոշմամբ Խմբագրական խորհուրդ՝ Դավիթ Հովհաննիսյան բ.գ.թ., պրոֆեսոր, Արտակարգ և լիազոր դեսպան (նախագահ) Արամ Սիմոնյան պ.գ.դ., պրոֆեսոր, ՀՀ ԳԱԱ թղթակից-անդամ Ռուբեն Սաֆրաստյան պ.գ.դ., պրոֆեսոր, ՀՀ ԳԱԱ ակադեմիկոս Արման Կիրակոսյան պ.գ.դ., պրոֆեսոր, Արտակարգ և լիազոր դեսպան Աննա Օհանյան քաղ.գ.դ. (ԱՄՆ) Սերգեյ Մինասյան քաղ.գ.դ. Քեթևան Խուցիշվիլի մարդ.գ.դ. (Վրաստան) Հայկ Քոչարյան պ.գ.թ., դոցենտ (համարի պատասխանատու) © Քաղաքակրթական և մշակութային հետազոտությունների կենտրոն‚ 2015 © Երևանի պետական համալսարան‚ 2015 CONTENT Forward by David Hovhannisyan 9-14 Arzoyan
    [Show full text]
  • Archival and Source Studies – Trends and Challenges”
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “ARCHIVAL AND SOURCE STUDIES – TRENDS AND CHALLENGES” 24-25 SEPTEMBER TBILISI 2020 THE CONFERENCE OPERATES: GEORGIAN AND ENGLISH TIME LIMIT: PRESENTATION: 15 MINUTES DEBATES: 5 MINUTES 24 SEPTEMBER OPENING SPEECHES FOR THE CONFERENCE - 09:00-09:30 CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS AND ATTENDEES ARE WELCOMED BY: TEONA IASHVILI – GENERAL DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF GEORGIA DAVID FRICKER – PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES (ICA), DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF AUSTRALIA JUSSI NUORTEVA – GENERAL DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF FINLAND CHARLES FARRUGIA – CHAIR OF THE EUROPEAN BRANCH OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES (EURBICA), DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF MALTA ZAAL ABASHIDZE – DIRECTOR OF KORNELI KEKELIDZE NATIONAL CENTER OF MANUSCRIPTS RISMAG GORDEZIANI – DOCTOR OF PHILOLOGY VASIL KACHARAVA – PRESIDENT OF THE GEORGIAN ASSOCIATION FOR AMERICAN STUDIES 24 SEPTEMBER PART I 09:35 -18:10 MODERATORS: BESIK JACHVLIANI NINO BADASHVILI, SABA SALUASHVILI 09:35 - 09:55 THE EXPEDITION OF PUBLIUS CANIDIUS CRASSUS TO IBERIA (36 BC) Levan Tavlalashvili, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University 10:00 - 10:20 CAUSES OF VIKING ATTACKS, ASPIRATION TO THE WEST (8TH-12TH CENTURIES) Mariam Gurgenidze, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University 10:25 - 10:45 FOR THE ISSUES OF THE SOURCES ON THE HISTORY OF THE CRUSADERS Tea Gogolishvili, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University 10:50 - 11:10 THE CULT OF MITHRAS IN GEORGIA Ketevan Kimeridze, The University of Georgia 11:15 - 11:35
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Universal Periodic Review Mid Term Report
    United Nations Universal Periodic Review Mid Term Report Georgia (2019) 1 Introduction The present mid-term report on the implementation of the recommendations received at the 2nd cycle of the Universal Periodic Review is submitted upon the voluntary pledge made by Georgia in the course of the adoption of the outcome of the UPR of Georgia on 17 March 2016. Namely, during the 2nd cycle of the Universal Periodic Review Georgia received 203 recommendations. 191 recommendations enjoyed the support of Georgia and 12 recommendations were noted. This report was elaborated with participation of all relevant agencies. Furthermore, the draft report was presented and discussed with a wide range of stakeholders, including the NHRI and relevant NGOs in the course of the meeting organized in cooperation and financial support of OHCHR in Borjomi (10-11 May 2018). The stakeholders’ comments and observations were taken into consideration in the final draft report. Moreover, pursuant to the amendments made in 2016 to the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament of Georgia, the draft report was submitted to the Parliament for consideration and reviewed by it. Georgia recognizes the importance of the UPR mechanism as a key element of the Human Rights Council, and reaffirms its commitment to continue to improve its protection of human rights and to fully co-operate with the Council as well as with other UN human rights mechanisms. Georgia attaches great importance not only to the submission of the state party report but its proper implementation. For this purposes, the Government of Georgia translated UPR recommendations in the respective National Human Rights Action Plan (for 2016-2017 and 2018-2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Fritz Bauer Und Der Auschwitz-Prozess
    1/2|2020 ZfBeg ZfBeg 1/2|2020 Freiburger Rundbrief Zeitschrift für christlich-jüdische Begegnung im Kontext be be g g » Die Frage ist wohl weniger, ob es e für die Erinnerungskultur nach der nächsten Erinnerungs- e oder übernächsten Generationenwende im Wandel g noch eine Zukunft geben wird, als vielmehr, kultur g wie diese Erinnerungskultur zu gestalten ist, nun d.h., welche aktuellen Probleme, Gefahren, im Wandel nun Herausforderungen und Chancen in dieser Zukunft auf uns zukommen. Erinnerungskultur Erinnerungskultur Erinnern ist ein dynamischer Prozess, der sich | durch inneren Druck und veränderte äußere Konstellationen in permanenter Veränderung g g befindet. [...] g im Kontext Deshalb erscheint eine selbstkritische Diskussion über die Standortbestimmung und Entwicklungs- dynamik der deutschen Erinnerungskultur zum gegenwärtigen Zeitpunkt dringend geboten.« Aleida Assmann Das neue Unbehagen an der Erinnerungskultur, München 2020, S. 12. Zeitschrift für christlich-jüdische Begegnung 2020 | 2 / Beg 1 ISSN 2513-1389 f Z ZfBeg 1/2 |2020 Zeitschrift für christlich-jüdische Begegnung im Kontext Folgezeitschrift des »Freiburger Rundbriefs« (Neue Folge) 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis 4 … Hinweise | Editorial Rubriken 6 … Joseph A. Kanofsky: b Bildung | Anregungen für Schule Zikaron – Kultur der Erinnerung Gemeinde | Erwachsenenbildung im Judentum 76 … Lucy Debus | Lisa Hellriegel | 18 … Katharina Stengel: Jonas Jakubowski | Louis Wörner: Fritz Bauer und der Auschwitz-Prozess Lagerhaus G – Gedenken ohne Gedenkstätte? Geschichtsvermittlung 24… Ulrich Ruh: auf dem Kleinen Grasbrook in Hamburg Gurs – ein besonderer Erinnerungsort 82 … Felix Henn: in Frankreich »Soll ein Judenkirch gewesen seyn«. Jüdische Spuren in Schwäbisch Gmünd 29… Wilhelm Schwendemann: Erinnerungsorte. Erinnerungslernen 86… Julian Wilhelm: an Orten nationalsozialistischer Was kann deutsche Rap-Musik Verbrechen im Wandel der Zeiten zur Erinnerungskultur im Kontext des Religionsunterrichts beitragen? 39… Reinhold Boschki: Impulse zu den Songs Erinnerungskultur im Wandel.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Results of Implementation of the National Concept and Action Plan on Tolerance and Civil Integration
    Monitoring results of implementation of the National Concept and Action Plan on Tolerance and Civil Integration Monitoring results of implementation of the National Concept and Action Plan on Tolerance and Civil Integration Council of National Minorities under the auspices of the Public Defender of Georgia 2010-2011 Published by the Tolerance Center under the Public Defender of Georgia with the support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Georgia, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) funded Advancing National Integration (ANI) Project of the United Nations Association of Georgia (UNAG), and the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author/s and do not necessarily represent those of UNDP, USAID, UNAG and ECMI. ISBN 978-9941-0-5067-1 Content 2010 Rule of Law; Political Integration and Civil Participation; Social and Regional Integration 11 State Language and Education 17 Culture and Identity Preservation 45 Media and Access to Information 70 2011 Rule of Law; Political Integration and Civil Participation; Social and Regional Integration 87 State Language and Education 95 Culture and Identity Preservations 126 Media and Access to Information 146 AnneX AnneX #1. National Concept for Tolerance and Civil Integration 165 AnneX #2. Action Plan 170 Introduction This publication presents findings of 2010-2011 monitoring of implementation of the Na- tional Concept and Action Plan on Tolerance and Civil Integration. The monitoring was conducted by the Council of National Minorities under the Public Defender of Georgia with the aim to assess state programs in support of civil integration and to elaborate rec- ommendations for addressing existing challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Report 2018
    1 I. Reconciliation and Engagement Policy ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 New Peace Initiatives ................................................................................................................... 1 Facilitation of Trade across Dividing Lines ............................................................................................... 2 Enhancing Educational Opportunities for the residents of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali Region/South Ossetia 3 Ensuring Access to Various State Services for the Residents of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali Region/ South Ossetia .................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Formats of Cooperation with International Partners ...................................................................... 6 1.3 Geneva International Discussions and Incident Prevention and Response Mechanism (IPRM) Meetings ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Engagement of Women in Peace Process ....................................................................................... 10 1.5 Identification of the Fate of the Persons Missing as a result of the Armed Conflicts .......................... 10 1.6 Implementation of Engagement Action Plan ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedings Abstracts and Thesis
    E-ISBN: 978-9949-7486-4-8 DOI suffix: 10.36962/MTDMS2020 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS ABSTRACTS AND THESIS Organizers of conference Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of NAS of Ukraine, Religious Studies Department (Ukraine, Kyiv) Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Faculty of History and Philosophy (Ukraine, Kyiv) NGO. Ukrainian Association of Researchers of Religion (Ukraine) LTD. The Aspendos International Medical and Social Science Academy (UK, London) MTÜ. The International Center for Research, Education & Training (Estonia, Tallinn) Azerbaijan-Ukraine The First International Scientific-Practical Conference- “Modern Tendencies of Dialogue in Multidenominational Society: philosophical, religious, legal view” Ukraine, Kyiv November 10-11, 2020 DOI suffix: 10.36962/MTDMS2020 E-ISBN: 978-9949-7486-4-8 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS ABSTRACTS AND THESIS Azerbaijan-Ukraine The First International Scientific-Practical Conference- “Modern Tendencies of Dialogue in Multidenominational Society: philosophical, religious, legal view” Ukraine, Kyiv November 10-11, 2020 UKRAINE, KYIV 2020 THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE- MODERN TENDENCIES OF DIALOGUE IN MULTIDENOMINATIONAL SOCIETY: PHILOSOPHICAL, RELIGIOUS, LEGAL VIEW. E-ISBN: 978-9949-7486-4-8 THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE- MODERN TENDENCIES OF OrganizerDIALOGUE of IN the MULTIDENOMINATIONAL conference: SOCIETY: PHILOSOPHICAL, RELIGIOUS, LEGAL VIEW. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of NAS of Ukraine, Religious Studies Department (Ukraine, Kyiv) Borys Grinchenko
    [Show full text]
  • Estera Grobman and Ruvin Zeligman Dr. Algimantas
    Nr. 1/2017 • 2/5777 DISCOVER – GET TO KNOW – ACCEPT Interview: Alina Azukaitis 6 In Living Memory: Estera Grobman and Ruvin Zeligman 8 Dr. Algimantas Kasparavičius: The “Policy” of the Lithuanian Provisional Government 10 Reconstruction of Palace of Sports: 12 No Threat to Šnipiškės Jewish Cemetery Passover Seder 14 ISSN 2424-4759 Editor’s Corner Dear reader, The start of the year was full as always with state holidays and commemorative days. Not least among them--the first birthday of the Bagel Shop Café! The weather is getting warmer and promising the beginning of blooming everywhere. The slopes of the hills of Vilnius, before the trees get leaves, will be covered in a succession of blooming wildflower species. Let's remember to stop and take in their beauty. If you feel gloomy sometimes, lift your eyes to the spring sky and spend a half-day with a good book and good friends. Whatever you do, read this issue of the Bagel Shop newsletter! We're waiting for your thoughts and suggestions for the next issues, please write: [email protected] Radvilė NEWS AT A GLANCE November 10, 2016 The Lithuanian Jewish Community hosts an exhibit of paintings called Ani Maamin (He- brew "I believe") by young artists Isaiah Jurken and Simona Sirusaitė dedicated to the Day of Remembrance of Lithua- nian Jewish Victims of Genocide. November 23 Longtime friend of the Kaunas Jewish Community Raimun- das Kaminskas and the Kaunas Coun- cil of the Lithuanian independence movement Sąjūdis hold a ceremony to commemorate Lithuanian Jewish soldiers at the Jewish cemetery in the Žaliakalnis neighborhood of Kaunas.
    [Show full text]
  • Restitution Policy in Georgia
    RESTITUTION POLICY IN GEORGIA RESTITUTION POLICY IN GEORGIA 2020 The document is prepared by Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI) within the framework of East-West Management Institute’s (EWMI) "Promoting Rule of Law in Georgia" (PROLoG) project, funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The content is the sole responsibility of the Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI) and does not necessarily reflect the views of United States Agency for International Development (USAID), United States Government or East-West Management Institute (EWMI). Author: Giorgi Noniashvili Project Director: Mariam Gavtadze © Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI), 2020 Web: www.tdi.ge TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................................6 2. State’s Inefficient Policy with regards to Restitution .........................................................................................................................8 3. Unreturned Property of the Minority Religious Communities ....................................................................................................13 Evangelical-Lutheran Church ...................................................................................................................................................................13 Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Orthodox Holy Church in Georgia ..................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Religion As a Marker of Identity for Georgians (1860-1918)
    S. Khvadagiani / Analytical Bulletin 8 (2015) Religion as a Marker of Identity for Georgians (1860-1918) Salome Khvadagiani Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University ([email protected]) Keywords: religion, identity marker, identity formation, "we" group and "others", intellectuals, nationalism Introduction In European countries, the process of self-determination of nations and formation of the main markers of identity began in the 19th century. The quest for answers to either of the questions “Who are ‘we’?” and “Who are ‘they’?” has not lost its relevance in the 21st century. Today’s answers to these questions are closely related to 19th century developments and to the beliefs and thoughts of the intellectuals of that time. Furthermore, the issues discussed by Georgian intellectuals in the second half of the 19th and at the beginning of 20th century remain controversial and still cause some public disputes. Therefore, it is important to track the identity formation process, which the current study is trying to do for the Georgian case. The paper aims to study the role of religion in the process of identity formation in Georgia from the 1860s to 1918. This is a period when the narrative of Georgian identity was shaped, so the ideas widely discussed among the intellectuals of that period determined the main identity markers and the main borders of the “we” group. Moreover, the identity markers formed in the 19th century still shape current discussions on national issues. Georgia is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious country. Therefore, it is important to know exactly how other religious groups were placed within the scope of the “we” group, and whether or not religion represented an identity marker that drew a strict line between the “we” group and the “others”.
    [Show full text]