Dr Ramandeep Singh Ahluwalia Dr Saurabh Khurana* ABSTRACT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Volume-8 | Issue-7 | July - 2019 | PRINT ISSN No. 2277 - 8179 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PATIENT PERCEPTION AND KNOWLEDGE ABOUT ANAESTHESIOLOGY AT A TERTIARY CARE SERVICE HOSPITAL Anaesthesiology Dr Ramandeep MD, Assoc Prof (Anaesthesiology), Deputy Commandant, Command Hospital Western Singh Ahluwalia Command, Chandimandir Cantonment, Panchkula-134107, Haryana Dr Saurabh MD, DNB, MNAMS, Asst Prof, Dept of Anaesthesiology, Command Hospital (Central Khurana* Command), Lucknow-226002, Uttar Pradesh *Corresponding Author ABSTRACT Aim: To assess the knowledge about Anaesthesiology among patients at a tertiary care service hospital. Objective: 1. Primary objective: To objectively assess the knowledge about Anaesthesiology amongst patients in a tertiary care centre. 2. Secondary objective: To educate the clientele about the field of Anaesthesiology. KEYWORDS INTRODUCTION Anaesthesiologist/Technician Anaesthesiology is one of the youngest branches in the medical field e. Is the person administering you anaesthesia a qualified doctor? and has developed exponentially over a short span of time. The f. As per you, how many years of training does an Anaesthesiologist mandate of an Anaesthesiologist is no longer confined to just undergo? conventional Operation Theatre (OT) and the ICU; it has spread out to g. What does an Anaesthesiologist do? critical care units, pain clinics, trauma centres, and resuscitation and i. Decides the fitness for surgery and optimizes you for surgery rescue teams.1 Despite being a speciality, which is widespread and ii. Puts you to sleep extends services to various departments in the hospital, its recognition iii. Provides pain relief during surgery and awareness amongst the clientele is considered to be miniscule. iv. Wakes you up from sleep Also there are myths and incredulity about the field and its v. Monitors you throughout surgery professionals. vi. Responsible for pain relief after surgery vii. All of the above With this thought process, the authors came up with an idea of viii. None of the above objectively assessing, and at the same time edifying the patients about h. During the surgery, who is primarily responsible for your overall the role of Anaesthesiology in the medical world. well being: Surgeon/Anaesthesiologist 3. Are you aware about the type of anaesthesia you will receive? MATERIALS AND METHODS 4. How many types of anaesthesia are you aware of? Study Design: It was a questionnaire-based study on patients 5. Are you aware about the complications of anaesthesia and if yes, scheduled for various surgical procedures under anaesthesia what all complications you are aware of? (general/neuroaxial/regional). A total of 100 patients were interviewed 6. Are you more concerned and scared about the surgery or the in the study. anaesthesia related to it? 7. Are you concerned about waking up from anaesthesia during Place and duration of study: surgery? The survey was performed over a period of 15 days in a tertiary care service hospital. Statistical Analysis The data collected was tabulated using MS Excel, assessed and the Questionnaire: results were expressed as percentages. A simplified questionnaire described as follows was used for the study. Personal Details: RESULTS Ÿ Name The study was skewed towards male gender as expected as it was Ÿ Gender conducted at a service hospital where at any given time the number of Ÿ Education admitted male patients exceeds the female patients. Ÿ Proposed surgery/procedure Table 1: Gender wise distribution Questions: S.No Gender No of patients (%) 1. Have you undergone any surgery/procedure under anaesthesia in the past: Yes/No, If Yes: 1. Male 67 a. Name of surgery/procedure 2. Female 33 b. Type of anaesthesia received Graph 1: c. Who all were present in OT before the procedure started: Surgeon, Anaesthesiologist, Matron, Assistant (tick) d. Who administered you the anaesthesia: Surgeon, Matron, Technician, Anaesthesiologist e. The person who administered you anaesthesia, was he a qualified doctor? Yes/No/Don't Know f. Did he/she visit you prior to surgery? Yes/No 2. If patient has not undergone any procedure under anaesthesia previously: a. Who all are likely to be present in OT when you are taken there: Surgeon, Matron, Anaesthesiologist, Technician b. Will it be a painful procedure? Yes/No/Don't know c. Will you be anaesthetized: Yes/No/Don't know d. Who will be administering you anaesthesia? Surgeon/ Matron/ International Journal of Scientific Research 25 Volume-8 | Issue-7 | July - 2019 PRINT ISSN No. 2277 - 8179 Table2: Age wise distribution primary role of an Anaesthesiologist in the hospital. In the present Majority of the patients were between their second-fourth decades of study we observed the following striking findings: life. 1. 35% of patients were more concerned and worried about the S.No. Age (yrs) No of patients (%) anaesthesia rather than surgery. 1. 21-30 39 2. 28% of patients were not aware about the kind of anaesthesia to be 2. 31-40 26 administered. 3. 41-50 13 3. 54% were not aware that actually an Anaesthesiologist would be administering the anaesthesia. 4. >50 22 Graph 2: These results clearly indicate that the patients posted for surgical procedures under anaesthesia need to be enlightened to improve their understanding about the subject. This would address their apprehension and at the same time prepare them for what lies ahead of them. Good counseling may narrow the gap in the confidence level that a patient perceives with respect to the Surgeon relative to the Anaesthesiologist.2 Secondly, in the era of ever increasing litigations in the medical practice, it is also important to brief the patients about the likely complications associated with the anaesthetic plan. To conclude, for most of the patients, Anaesthesiologists are like 'unseen doctors',3 like a bass guitarist of a band whose presence is Table 3: Literacy Level inconspicuous until his absence! Majority of the patients were at least high school educated, which was beneficial as they were in a better position to understand and respond to Limitations the questionnaire. The present study was conducted at a single centre and a multi centric S.No. Education level No. of patients (%) study would definitely increase its sensitivity. Also, the educational qualification of the patients can greatly influence their general 1. Illiterate 17 perception about the subject. 2. High School 59 3. Graduate 24 REFERENCES 1. Swinhoe CK, Groves ER. Patients’ knowledge of anaesthetic practice & the role of Graph 3: anaesthetists; Anaesthesia1994 Feb., 49(2)165-6. 2. Shevade K, Panagopulos G. A survey of 800 patients’ knowledge, attitudes & concerns regarding anaesthesia; Anesthesia & analgesia 1991 Aug., 73 (2) 190-8. 3. Hume MA, Kennedy B, Asbury AJ. Patient knowledge of anaesthesia & perioperative care; Anaesthesia 1994 Aug., 49 (8) 715-8. Core of the study has been summarized as follows. Table 4: Summary of Results S.No. Parameters Percentage 1. % of patients who felt that the person giving 75 anaesthesia was a qualified doctor 2. % of patients concerned about waking up from 9 anaesthesia during the procedure 3. Primary concern/scare related to anaesthesia 35 4. Primary concern/scare related to surgery 46 5. Who would be giving anaesthesia: 50 a) Surgeon 46 b) Anaesthesiologist 3 c) OT Matron 1 d) OT Technician 6. Concerned about waking up from surgery Yes: 9% No: 91% 7. Awareness about type of anaesthesia to be Yes: 72% administered No: 28% DISCUSSION Over the years, despite increasing awareness about health care setup amongst Indian population, and increasing role of an Anaesthesiologist in critical and effective management of patients, not only the knowledge about Anaesthesiology as a field and its providers remains lacking, there are myths and skepticism. Also, a patient admitted to the hospital for a surgical procedure under anaesthesia is exposed to an alien and a strange environment wherein it is not possible for him to comprehend the role of various care providers associated with him. It is natural and understandable that he relates it more closely to the primary care clinician. We need to enlighten the patient about his expectations as far as the anaesthetic management is concerned. Various Anaesthesiologists/residents of the department conducted the present study as an oral questionnaire. At the end of the questionnaire, the patients were briefed about Anaesthesiology as a subject and 26 International Journal of Scientific Research.
Recommended publications
  • Nursing Association of Nepal List of Life Members S.No

    Nursing Association of Nepal List of Life Members S.No

    Nursing Association of Nepal List of Life Members S.No. Regd. No. Name Post Address 1 2 Mrs. Prema Singh 2 14 Mrs. I. Mathema Bir Hospital 3 15 Ms. Manu Bangdel Matron Maternity Hospital 4 19 Mrs. Geeta Murch 5 20 Mrs. Dhana Nani Lohani Lect. Nursing C. Maharajgunj 6 24 Mrs. Saraswati Shrestha Sister Mental Hospital 7 25 Mrs. Nati Maya Shrestha (Pradhan) Sister Kanti Hospital 8 26 Mrs. I. Tuladhar 9 32 Mrs. Laxmi Singh 10 33 Mrs. Sarada Tuladhar Sister Pokhara Hospital 11 37 Mrs. Mita Thakur Ad. Matron Bir Hospital 12 42 Ms. Rameshwori Shrestha Sister Bir Hospital 13 43 Ms. Anju Sharma Lect. 14 44 Ms. Sabitry Basnet Ast. Matron Teaching Hospital 15 45 Ms. Sarada Shrestha 16 46 Ms. Geeta Pandey Matron T.U.T. H 17 47 Ms. Kamala Tuladhar Lect. 18 49 Ms. Bijaya K. C. Matron Teku Hospital 19 50 Ms.Sabitry Bhattarai D. Inst Nursing Campus 20 52 Ms. Neeta Pokharel Lect. F.H.P. 21 53 Ms. Sarmista Singh Publin H. Nurse F. H. P. 22 54 Ms. Sabitri Joshi S.P.H.N F.H.P. 23 55 Ms. Tuka Chhetry S.P.HN 24 56 Ms. Urmila Shrestha Sister Bir Hospital 25 57 Ms. Maya Manandhar Sister 26 58 Ms. Indra Maya Pandey Sister 27 62 Ms. Laxmi Thakur Lect. 28 63 Ms. Krishna Prabha Chhetri PHN F.P.M.C.H. 29 64 Ms. Archana Bhattacharya Lect. 30 65 Ms. Indira Pradhan Matron Teku Hospital S.No. Regd. No. Name Post Address 31 67 Ms.
  • Lawrlwytho'r Atodiad Gwreiddiol

    Lawrlwytho'r Atodiad Gwreiddiol

    Operational services structure April 2021 14/04/2021 Operational Leadership Structures Director of Operations Director of Nursing & Quality Medical Director Lee McMenamy Joanne Hiley Dr Tessa Myatt Medical Operations Operations Clinical Director of Operations Deputy Director of Nursing & Deputy Medical Director Hazel Hendriksen Governance Dr Jose Mathew Assistant Clinical Director Assistant Director of Assistant Clinical DWiraerctringor ton & Halton Operations Corporate Corporate Lorna Pink Assistant Assistant Director Julie Chadwick Vacant Clinical Director of Nursing, AHP & Associate Clinical Director Governance & Professional Warrington & Halton Compliance Standards Assistant Director of Operations Assistant Clinical Director Dr Aravind Komuravelli Halton & Warrington Knowsley Lee Bloomfield Claire Hammill Clare Dooley Berni Fay-Dunkley Assistant Director of Operations Knowsley Associate Medical Director Nicky Over Assistant Clinical Director Allied Health Knowsley Assistant Director of Sefton Professional Dr Ashish Kumar AssiOstapenrta Dtiironesc tKnor oofw Oslpeeyr ations Sara Harrison Lead Nicola Over Sefton James Hester Anne Tattersall Assistant Clinical Director Associate Clinical Director Assistant Director of St Helens & Knowsley Inpatients St Helens Operations Sefton Debbie Tubey Dr Raj Madgula AssistanAt nDniree Tcatttore ofrs aOllp erations Head of St Helens & Knowsley Inpatients Safeguarding Tim McPhee Assistant Clinical Director Sarah Shaw Assistant Director of Associate Medical Director Operations St Helens Mental Health
  • THE DEVELOPMENT of NURSING EDUCATION in the ENGLISH-SPEAKING CARIBBEAN ISLANDS by PEARL I

    THE DEVELOPMENT of NURSING EDUCATION in the ENGLISH-SPEAKING CARIBBEAN ISLANDS by PEARL I

    THE DEVELOPMENT OF NURSING EDUCATION IN THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING CARIBBEAN ISLANDS by PEARL I. GARDNER, B.S.N., M.S.N., M.Ed. A DISSERTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION Approved Accepted Dean of the Graduate School August, 1993 ft 6 l^yrr^7^7 801 J ,... /;. -^o ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS C?^ /c-j/^/ C^ ;^o.^^ I would like to thank Dr. Clyde Kelsey, Jr., for his C'lp '^ ^unflagging support, his advice and his constant vigil and encouragement in the writing of this dissertation. I would also like to thank Dr. Patricia Yoder-Wise who acted as co-chairperson of my committee. Her advice was invaluable. Drs. Mezack, Willingham, and Ewalt deserve much praise for the many times they critically read the manuscript and gave their input. I would also like to thank Ms. Janey Parris, Senior Program Officer of Health, Guyana, the government officials of the Caribbean Embassies, representatives from the Caribbean Nursing Organizations, educators from the various nursing schools and librarians from the archival institutions and libraries in Trinidad and Tobago and Jamaica. These individuals agreed to face-to-face interviews, answered telephone questions and mailed or faxed information on a regular basis. Much thanks goes to Victor Williams for his computer assistance and to Hannelore Nave for her patience in typing the many versions of this manuscript. On a personal level I would like to thank my niece Eloise Walters for researching information in the nursing libraries in London, England and my husband Clifford for his belief that I could accomplish this task.
  • Design and Implementation of Health Information Systems

    Design and Implementation of Health Information Systems

    Design and implementation of health information systems Edited by Theo Lippeveld Director of Health Information Systems, John Snow Inc., Boston, MA, USA Rainer Sauerborn Director of the Department of Tropical Hygiene and Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Germany Claude Bodart Project Director, German Development Cooperation, Manila, Philippines World Health Organization Geneva 2000 WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Design and implementation of health information systems I edited by Theo Lippeveld, Rainer Sauerborn, Claude Bodart. 1.1nformation systems-organization and administration 2.Data collection-methods I.Lippeveld, Theo II.Sauerborn, Rainer III.Bodart, Claude ISBN 92 4 1561998 (NLM classification: WA 62.5) The World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its pub­ lications, in part or in full. Applications and enquiries should be addressed to the Office of Publi­ cations, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, which will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations already available. © World Health Organization 2000 Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright protection in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Health Or­ ganization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers' products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
  • Evaluation of Hospital Information System in the Northern Province in South Africa

    Evaluation of Hospital Information System in the Northern Province in South Africa

    EVALUATION OF HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM IN THE NORTHERN PROVINCE IN SOUTH AFRICA “ Using Outcome Measures” Report prepared for the HEALTH SYSTEMS TRUST By Nolwazi Mbananga Rhulani Madale Piet Becker THE MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA PRETORIA May 2002 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Department of Health and Welfare in the Northern Province is acknowledged for its mandate to conduct this study and its support of the project throughout. The project Team is recognised for its great efforts in developing the project proposal and obtaining the necessary funding to conduct the study, without which it would not have been possible. The project team members; Dr Jeremy Wyatt, Dr LittleJohns, Dr Herbst, Dr Zwarenstein, Dr Power, Dr Rawlinson, Dr De Swart, Dr P Becker, Ms Madale and others played a key role in maintaining the scientific rigour for the study and their dedication is appreciated. The MEDUNSA Community Health in the Northern Province is credited for the direction and support it provided during the early stages of project development, planning and implementation. It is important to explain that Ms Mbananga conducted the qualitative component of the study as a Principal investigator while she and Dr Becker were called upon to take over the quantitative component of the study and joined at the stage of post implementation data collection. The financial support that was provided by the Health Systems Trust and the Medical Research Council is highly valued this project could not have been started and successfully completed without it. We cannot forget our secretaries: Emily Gomes and Alta Hansen who assisted us in transcribing data.
  • The Matron's Handbook

    The Matron's Handbook

    The matron’s handbook For aspiring and experienced matrons Updated July 2021 Contents Foreword........................................................................................ 2 Introduction .................................................................................... 4 The matron’s key roles................................................................... 6 1. Inclusive leadership, professional standards and accountability 8 2. Governance, patient safety and quality .................................... 12 3. Workforce planning and resource management ...................... 17 4. Patient experience and reducing health inequalities ................ 22 5. Performance and operational oversight ................................... 24 6. Digital and information technology ........................................... 27 7. Education, training and development ....................................... 33 8. Research and development ..................................................... 36 9. Collaborative working and clinical effectiveness ...................... 37 10. Service improvement and transformation .............................. 40 Appendix: The matron’s developmental framework and competencies............................................................................... 43 Acknowledgements ...................................................................... 51 1 | Contents Foreword Matrons are vital to delivering high quality care to patients and their relatives across the NHS and the wider health and care sector. They
  • Divisional Structure - University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust – As at 1 July 2021

    Divisional Structure - University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust – As at 1 July 2021

    Divisional structure - University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust – as at 1 July 2021 Chief operating officer Joe Teape Division A Division B Division C Division D DCD – Andrew Webb DCD – Trevor Smith DCD – Freya Pearson DCD – David Higgs DDO – Greg Chapple DDO – Gavin Hawkins DDO – Martin De Sousa DHN/P – Rachel Davies DHN/P – Sarah Herbert DDO – Jacqui McAfee DHN/P – Louisa Green DHN/P – Natasha Watts Acuity Matron – Karen Hill DR&DL – Fraser Cummings DoM – Suzanne Cunningham DR&DL – Boyd Ghosh DR&DL – Bhaskar Somani DFM – John Light DR&DL – Luise Marino DFM – Alex Mawers (Interim) DS&BDM – Alison Gray DFM – Wayne Rogers DFM – Emma Hawkins DS&BDM – Adam Wells HRBP – Emma Watts DS&BDM – Dan Jeffery DS&BDM – Victoria Kearney HRBP – Rachel Dore HRBP – Rachel Dore (covering until replacement) Care groups HRBP – Katie Dunman (nee Molloy) Care groups Cancer care: Care groups Care groups Surgery: CGCL – Tim Iveson Women and newborn: Cardiovascular and thoracic: CGCL – John Knight CGM – Collette Byelong CGCL – Sarah Walker CGCL – Edwin Woo CGM – Justin Sanders (from 5/7/21) A/CGM – awaiting appointment CGM – Fiona Lawson CGM – Fiona Liddell A/CGM – Jon Watson Matron – Jenny Milner IP & Theatres Matron – Carol Gosling ACGM – Juliet Thomas A/CGM – Erin Flahavan Matron – Steph Churchill OP Matron – Karen Elkins Matron – Jenny Dove Neonatal Matron – Andrea Robson (interim) Matron – Kerry Rayner Matron – Julia Tonks Matron – Georgina Kirk Angie Ansell (from 12/7/21) Emergency medicine: Matron - Jean-Paul Evangelista Matron – Jo Rigby CGCL
  • The Case of Modern Matrons in the English NHS

    The Case of Modern Matrons in the English NHS

    The dynamics of professions and development of new roles in public services organizations: The case of modern matrons in the English NHS Abstract This study contributes to research examining how professional autonomy and hierarchy impacts upon the implementation of policy designed to improve the quality of public services delivery through the introduction of new managerial roles. It is based on an empirical examination of a new role for nurses - modern matrons - who are expected by policy makers to drive organizational change aimed at tackling health care acquired infections [HCAI] in the National Health Service [NHS] within England. First, we show that the changing role of nurses associated with their ongoing professionalisation limit modern matron‟s influence over their own ranks in tackling HCAI. Second, modern matrons influence over doctors is limited. Third, government policy itself appears inconsistent in its support for the role of modern matrons. Modern matrons‟ attempts to tackle HCAI appear more effective where infection control activity is situated in professional practice and where modern matrons integrate aspirations for improved infection control within mainstream audit mechanisms in a health care organization. Key words: professions, NHS, modern matrons, health care acquired infections Introduction The organization and management of professional work remains a significant area of analysis (Ackroyd, 1996; Freidson, 2001; Murphy, 1990; Reed, 1996). It is argued that professional autonomy and hierarchy conflict with bureaucratic and managerial methods of organizing work, especially attempts at supervision (Broadbent and Laughlin, 2002; Freidson, 2001; Larson, 1979). Consequently, the extension of managerial prerogatives and organizational controls are seen to challenge the autonomy, legitimacy and power of professional groups (Clarke and Newman, 1997; Exworthy and Halford, 1999).
  • Interventions to Reduce Unplanned Hospital Admission:A Series of Systematic Reviews Page 3

    Interventions to Reduce Unplanned Hospital Admission:A Series of Systematic Reviews Page 3

    Interventions to reduce unplanned hospital admission: a series of systematic reviews Funded by National Institute for Health Research Research for Patient Benefit no. PB-PG-1208-18013 Sarah Purdy, University of Bristol Shantini Paranjothy, Cardiff University Alyson Huntley, University of Bristol Rebecca Thomas, Cardiff University Mala Mann, Cardiff University Dyfed Huws, Cardiff University Peter Brindle, NHS Bristol Glyn Elwyn, Cardiff University Final Report June 2012 Acknowledgements Advisory group Karen Bloor Senior research fellow, University of York Tricia Cresswell Deputy medical director of NHS North East Helen England Vice chair of the South of England Specialised Commissioning Group and chairs the Bristol Research and Development Leaders Group Martin Rowland Chair in Health Services Research, University of Cambridge Will Warin Professional Executive Committee Chair, NHS Bristol. Frank Dunstan Chair in Medical Statistics, Department of Epidemiology, Cardiff University Patient & public involvment group In association with Hildegard Dumper Public Involvement Manager at Bristol Community Health With additional support from Rosemary Simmonds Research associate University of Bristol Library support Lesley Greig and Stephanie Bradley at the Southmead Library & Information Service, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol and South Plaza library, NHS Bristol and Bristol Community Health, South Plaza, Marlborough Street, Bristol. Additional support David Salisbury assistance with paper screening. Funding This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research, Research for Patient Benefit programme (grant PB-PG-1208-18013). This report presents independent research commissioned by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
  • Safe and Effective Staffing: Nursing Against the Odds

    Safe and Effective Staffing: Nursing Against the Odds

    Safe and Effective Staffing: Nursing Against the Odds UK POLICY REPORT Staffing levels, skill mix, sickness, “ unprecedented demands, patient numbers, lack of resources and capacity have left me fearing for a profession I once loved. ” SAFE AND EFFECTIVE STAFFING Contents Foreword 1 Executive summary 2 1. What is safe and effective staffing? 4 2. The impact of staffing levels on patient care 6 3. Approaches to safe and effective staffing across the UK 11 4. What urgent action is needed 18 Appendix 1: Survey method and respondents 20 Appendix 2: Survey findings by country 24 Appendix 3: A sample of experiences from nursing staff across the UK 31 Appendix 4: RCN UK Safe and Effective Staffing Group members 37 References 38 Acknowledgements This report was authored by Antonia Borneo, Claire Helm and Julian Russell. Significant thanks to the RCN UK Safe and Effective Staffing Group who have led this work. They are identified in Appendix 4. RCN Legal Disclaimer This publication contains information, advice and guidance to help members of the RCN. It is intended for use within the UK but readers are advised that practices may vary in each country and outside the UK. The information in this booklet has been compiled from professional sources, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the RCN provides accurate and expert information and guidance, it is impossible to predict all the circumstances in which it may be used. Accordingly, the RCN shall not be liable to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by what is contained in or left out of this website information and guidance.
  • Advanced Nursing Practice

    Advanced Nursing Practice

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kaiserslauterer uniweiter elektronischer Dokumentenserver Arbeits- und Forschungsberichte aus dem Projekt EB – Bildung als Exponent individueller und regionaler Entwicklung Nr. 4 Advanced Nursing Practice Rahmenbedingungen in Deutschland und Literaturüber- sicht zu nationalen und internationalen Modellen erweiterter Pflegepraxis Luise Geithner, Doris Arnold, Alexandra Feiks, Anna Katharina Helbig Maike Scheipers, Tatjana Steuerwald 2016 Impressum: EB – Bildung als Exponent individueller und regionaler Entwicklung – Evidenzbasierte Bedarfserschließung und vernetzte Kompetenzentwicklung Förderkennzeichen: 16OH21008 Herausgeber: Hochschule Kaiserslautern Prof. Dr. Konrad Wolf Morlauterer Straße 31 67657 Kaiserslautern Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Jun.-Prof. Dr. Matthias Rohs Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße 67663 Kaiserslautern Hochschule Ludwigshafen Dr. Doris Arnold Ernst-Boehe-Str. 4 67059 Ludwigshafen am Rhein 2016 ISSN 2364-8996 Lizenz Arbeits- und Forschungsberichte aus dem Projekt EB sind unter einer Creative-Commons-Lizenz veröffentlicht: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International Lizenz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Inhaltsverzeichnis Abbildungsverzeichnis ........................................................................................................... 2 Tabellenverzeichnis ..............................................................................................................
  • Towards Effective and Efficient Health Information Technology Adoption In

    Towards Effective and Efficient Health Information Technology Adoption In

    Final Progress Report Towards Effective and Efficient Health Information Technology 1 Adoption in Home Care Inclusive Dates of Project: 8/1/2013 - 7/31/2014 Federal Project Officer: Kevin Chaney Grant Number: 1R03HS022352-01 Team Members Gunes Koru, Principal Investigator Anthony F. Norcio, Senior Personnel Health Information Technology Lab hit.umbc.edu University of Maryland, Baltimore County Baltimore, MD Oct 29, 2014 1 This project was supported by grant number R03HS022352 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Structured Abstract Purpose: To increase the effectiveness and efficiency of health IT adoption in home health agencies (HHAs) Scope: A qualitative study was conducted to obtain rich contextual information strengthening the evidence base about the (i) HHAs' challenges and opportunities related to delivering care and conducting business, which should derive health IT adoption strategies and decisions to achieve effectiveness (ii) contextual determinants of health IT adoption that should be managed to achieve efficiency by minimizing overheads Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the related professionals from Maryland HHAs. The topical areas were based on (i) a number of established systems analysis techniques such as problem analysis, duration analysis, activity-based costing, outcome analysis, and technology analysis to document the HHAs' challenges and opportunities (ii) the constructs in the Rogers' diffusion theory to uncover the contextual determinants of adoption. The interview transcripts provided the raw data analyzed using the Framework method. The analysis of qualitative data included constructing an index, open coding, summarizing and sorting, and eliciting descriptive and explanatory accounts.