Unrevised Transcript of Evidence Taken Before

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unrevised Transcript of Evidence Taken Before Unrevised transcript of evidence taken before The Select Committee on the European Union External Affairs (Sub-Committee C) Inquiry on EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE Evidence Session No. 11 Heard in Public Questions 229 - 232 TUESDAY 22 JANUARY 2013 2.00 pm Witnesses: Elmar Brok, Roberto Gualtieri, Arnaud Danjean, Véronique De Keyser, Tarja Cronberg, Sir Graham Watson, Charles Tannock and Sir Robert Atkins USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is an uncorrected transcript of evidence taken in public and webcast on www.parliamentlive.tv. 2. Any public use of, or reference to, the contents should make clear that neither Members nor witnesses have had the opportunity to correct the record. If in doubt as to the propriety of using the transcript, please contact the Clerk of the Committee. 3. Members and witnesses are asked to send corrections to the Clerk of the Committee within 7 days of receipt. 1 Members present Lord Teverson (Chairman) Lord Foulkes of Cumnock Lord Lamont of Lerwick Lord Radice ________________ Examination of Witnesses Elmar Brok MEP, Chairman, European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee (AFET), Roberto Gualtieri MEP, AFET, Arnaud Danjean MEP, Chairman of the SEDE Sub-Committee, AFET, Véronique De Keyser MEP, AFET, Tarja Cronberg MEP, AFET, Sir Graham Watson MEP, AFET, Charles Tannock MEP, AFET, and Sir Robert Atkins MEP, AFET, gave evidence. Elmar Brok: Thank you very much for coming to us. Most of you I have known for many years, I must say. I think I saw you first 30 years ago, so I hope we have an interesting debate. To tell you the truth, I am a little late because I came from a festivity. In another room of this Parliament, there was a meeting about the Élysée treaty and the German/French relationship. Today, we have the 50th anniversary, and this is such an historical event. It just started in Berlin. I was invited to that but I am here now. For the first time in Berlin, there was a full session of both Parliaments. The French and the German Parliaments met for a joint session in Berlin, in the Reichstag, which I believe is of European dimensions. It is very important that that was possible, if you have seen our history. I wrote an article about that, and read in the papers of Adenauer and De Gaulle at that time, and then we had the middle of the debate. The two guys said at that time, one week after De Gaulle stopped membership negotiations with Britain, that it is not possible to have someone in the Union who does not apply to all the rules of the Common Market and has special treatment. I thought, “What a modern debate to have in 1963”. It was more or less 2 from both sides the same arguments as there are today. Sometimes you read that in the old papers, but still we are not clear on all sides who was right at that time and who is right today. That is the reason why we have this discussion here. Lord Teverson, please start our debate. Here we have members from all the groups—from the EPP, from the Socialists, from the Liberals, Sir Robert Atkins, who is representing himself and his group. Please, you have the floor. Q229 The Chairman: President, thank you very much indeed for your welcome and thank you for participating in our inquiry in this particular fashion. Perhaps I could just explain that, in conducting our inquiry into the External Action Service, we will be using this meeting and the discussion and dialogue that we have this afternoon as part of our evidence when we write our report next month. We are not here to talk about the British situation in Europe or all the other topical issues that we sometimes talk about with our European colleagues; we are here very much looking at the External Action Service as an inquiry. We are particularly keen to have a report published, so that when the review takes place, probably starting in the spring through to summer, we are able to contribute positively to it. I understand you are writing your own report for the same reason. We are coming towards the end of this particular inquiry. We are meeting with our own Europe Minister, Mr Lidington, later this week to take a Foreign Office view, but we have been talking to academics, to member states and to international organisations to take evidence. We are trying to come up with conclusions that are useful for the way that the EEAS should move forward after its first years of operation. The European Parliament and you, as a foreign affairs Committee, will have probably far more day-to-day experience of the External Action Service than we do as a national parliament. We are very interested in your views about how the EEAS has succeeded so far, through building the Service while having a number of external challenges, and where you think it should go in the future, as well as 3 particularly your own relationship with the EEAS, the High Representative and any of your own thoughts around national parliaments and their role in terms of scrutiny and its work with the national parliaments. I have with me Lord Lamont, Lord Foulkes and Lord Radice. We are also a reflection of UK politics fairly well, in terms of two Labour Members, one Liberal Democrat and a Conservative—no UKIP, I am afraid, with us today. We do have two Members of UKIP in the House of Lords. There are no Cross-Benchers, who are an important independent part of the House of Lords. Otherwise, we are here. Elmar Brok: A pro-European delegation. Thank you very much. We also have Mr Danjean; he is our chairman of the Sub-Committee on Security and Defence, also he has a speciality an EU commissioner. Also the Greens are here and the Communists, so I think all the groups are represented here. Let me make a short remark about why the EEAS was set up. Mr Gualtieri and I are the reporters of the Parliament for the review process. This EEAS and the position of the High Representative and Vice-President of the Commission were set up in order to get synergy effects and save money in the long run. We had, in the past, a foreign relations commissioner with money and a staff. We had a High Representative, Mr Solana, with the right to negotiate but without staff and money. Every half a year, we had a new president of the Foreign Ministers Council. Now we have that put together in the hands of Lady Ashton, in order to get synergy effects and have political and economic synergy effects. This does not apply fully at the moment due to different reasons, but the structural reasons are that this cannot work fully because to build this up over two years—it has been only two years— and to form an office fully is very difficult. Also, we had to merge the Commission people who are out of the Commission and foreign service, so the Commission has fewer civil servants in that field. The old civil servants in foreign relations for the Commission were 4 part of the development. Council people moved there, so there are fewer in the Council in that field, and member state representatives, in order to increase the influence of the member states and to get their experience. That is the idea behind it. It has coherence for five years, also in the leadership of the Council. It is ridiculous that foreign policy and defence questions have, every half a year, someone else there. For a smaller country, it was a once-in-a-lifetime chance to be invited to the Oval Office. But there was no strategy. This was the general idea; it was a constitutional convention and later I think an inter-governmental conference. The procedure for that—I was a member of the inter-governmental conference, both for the constitutional treaty and for the Lisbon treaty—was an especially long debate with the British Foreign Ministers in those meetings. The compromise we found is the compromise of 26 with Britain, when I read into the result that we have. This should be taken into consideration when we make a judgment. I am not able to make a final judgment about that, because it is too soon to judge it, but I see certain advantages now already. We have to continue them to have real synergy effects. The shortcomings, which are always there in such a situation, we have to find in the review process and we have to make changes. But there is one point where it is not fast enough in Brussels and where the political will of member countries is lacking. I will give you one example: Mali. In October, it was decided to set up a mission to train Mali’s army and police. Now, as the crisis exploded two weeks ago, we have found out that, despite it having been decided, member states were still considering how to do that. That is not so much a fault of you but of member states, including my own member state, which found out at the end of the day that two aeroplanes to transport non-French soldiers—indeed, a hypocrisy itself—were set up. We also have to see how far the political will goes and the commitment of member states to compositions, because in all these questions the interests of all our countries are 5 involved.
Recommended publications
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix to Memorandum of Law on Behalf of United
    APPENDIX TO MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON BEHALF OF UNITED KINGDOM AND EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARIANS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION LIST OF AMICI HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT House of Lords The Lord Ahmed The Lord Alderdice The Lord Alton of Liverpool, CB The Rt Hon the Lord Archer of Sandwell, QC PC The Lord Avebury The Lord Berkeley, OBE The Lord Bhatia, OBE The Viscount Bledisloe, QC The Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury The Rt Hon the Baroness Boothroyd, OM PC The Lord Borrie, QC The Rt Hon the Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone, DL PC The Lord Bowness, CBE DL The Lord Brennan, QC The Lord Bridges, GCMG The Rt Hon the Lord Brittan of Spennithorne, QC DL PC The Rt Hon the Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville, CH PC The Viscount Brookeborough, DL The Rt Hon the Lord Browne-Wilkinson, PC The Lord Campbell of Alloway, ERD QC The Lord Cameron of Dillington The Rt Hon the Lord Cameron of Lochbroom, QC The Rt Rev and Rt Hon the Lord Carey of Clifton, PC The Lord Carlile of Berriew, QC The Baroness Chapman The Lord Chidgey The Lord Clarke of Hampstead, CBE The Lord Clement-Jones, CBE The Rt Hon the Lord Clinton-Davis, PC The Lord Cobbold, DL The Lord Corbett of Castle Vale The Rt Hon the Baroness Corston, PC The Lord Dahrendorf, KBE The Lord Dholakia, OBE DL The Lord Donoughue The Baroness D’Souza, CMG The Lord Dykes The Viscount Falkland The Baroness Falkner of Margravine The Lord Faulkner of Worcester The Rt Hon the
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Emergency, Europe Hope
    COLLOQUIUM Thursday 18th March Thursday 18th March Friday 19th March 9.00 am Europe Emergency, 2:30 pm - 6:45 pm 9.00 am - 1.00 pm Opening of the colloquium - Sabine THILLAYE, Chairwoman of the European Affairs THE NEW CHALLENGES: REGALIAN TIME TOWARDS THE CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE Europe Hope Committee of the National Assembly OF EUROPE: AN AGENDA FOR TWO YEARS 2.30 pm – 3.50 pm FIRST ROUND TABLE Opening of the morning 9.15 am 18-19 MARCH 2021 DEFENDING EUROPE? THE IMPASSES OF - Enrico LETTA, President of the Jacques Delors Institute, former President of the Italian Council Welcome address PACIFISM, THE LIMITS OF ATLANTICISM - Richard FERRAND, President of the National Assembly President 9.15 am - 10.50 am FIRST ROUND TABLE - Jean-Dominique GIULIANI, President of the Robert Schuman 9.30 am -12.30 pm Foundation THINKING THE INSTITUTIONAL MODEL THE EUROPEAN UNION AT THE TIME OF THE Debate President COPERNICAN REVOLUTION - Franziska BRANTNER, German MP - Pierre VIMONT, Ambassador of France, former Executive - Arnaud DANJEAN, Member of the European Parliament Secretary General of the European External Action Service (EEAS) 9.30 am - 10.50 am FIRST ROUND TABLE - Nicole GNESOTTO, Professor at the Conservatoire national des arts et métiers Debate IS EUROPE GEOPOLITICALLY MARGINALISED? - Claude-France ARNOULD, former Director of the European - Jean-Louis BOURLANGES, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Defence Agency Committee of the National Assembly - Luuk VAN MIDDELAAR, academic, former adviser to Herman van Chairman Rompuy, President of the European
    [Show full text]
  • 16Th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting Between the European Parliament and the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula 16th Inter-parliamentary Meeting between the European Parliament and the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea 10 January 2013 Brussels A delegation from the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea visited the European Parliament in Brussels on 10 January 2013 on the occasion of the 16th inter-parliamentary meeting between both Assemblies. The South Korean delegation was led by Mrs LEE Meekyung, Chairman of the Delegation for Relations with the European Union in the National Assembly (Democratic United Party). The European Parliament's Delegation for Relations with the Korean Peninsula is chaired by Mr Herbert REUL (Germany, EPP). This inter-parliamentary meeting was dedicated to four main issues: key political and economic developments in Korea and the EU, the situation on the Korean Peninsula and inter-Korean relations, and the development of the EU-Korea Strategic Partnership. The previous inter-parliamentary meeting took place in November 2011 in Seoul. Due to the parliamentary elections in April 2012 and the presidential elections in December 2012, no inter-parliamentary meeting took place that year. The Korean delegation also met with the Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Mr Elmar Brok, the Chairman of the International Trade Committee, Mr Vital Moreira, and was received by Vice-President Georgios Papastamkos. Meeting with Mr Elmar Brok, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee Mr Brok welcomed the Korean delegation to the European Parliament on the occasion of the first inter-parliamentary meeting following the April 2012 parliamentary elections in Korea. He underlined that the Republic of Korea is a very close partner of the European Union in Asia and a very active member of the international community.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report
    SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held.
    [Show full text]
  • Europa Stärken Heißt Deutschland Stärken! Deutschland Heißt Stärken Europa
    Europa stärken heißt Deutschland stärken! Deutschland heißt stärken Europa 1 2 Europa stärken heißt Deutschland stärken Die europäische Politik steht heute mehr denn je im Zentrum des öffentlichen Interesses in Deutschland. Die großen Herausforderungen unserer Zeit – die kriegeri- schen Konflikte in unseren Nachbarregionen, die Migra- tionsbewegungen und der Kampf gegen Islamismus und Terrorismus – lassen sich nicht mehr national lösen. Nur gemeinsam mit unseren europäischen Partnern können wir tragfähige Lösungen erarbeiten und die Errungenschaften der europäischen Einigung – Frieden, Freiheit, Sicherheit und wirtschaftlicher Wohlstand – erhalten. Das Auftreten populistischer, europafeindlicher Parteien und der von Großbritannien angestrebte Austritt aus der EU dürfen nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen, dass die überwältigende Mehrheit der Deutschen wie der Euro- päer von der Notwendigkeit der europäischen Einigung überzeugt ist. Dieses Vertrauen gilt es durch sachge- rechte politische Lösungen auf allen Ebenen zu stärken. Wir arbeiten daher nachhaltig für sichere EU-Außen- grenzen, eine dauerhafte Reduktion der Migrations- ströme nach Europa, eine stabile europäische Währung, solide Staatshaushalte, einen funktionierenden Binnen- markt, Wirtschaftswachstum und Arbeitsplätze, innere und äußere Sicherheit sowie die Bewahrung der Schöp- fung. All dies können wir nur gemeinsam mit unseren europäischen Partnern erreichen und dauerhaft sichern, im Interesse Deutschlands und Europas! Diese Broschüre bietet Ihnen einen Überblick über die Arbeit und
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Coordinators in the European Parliament
    #THEUEBERSICHT COMMITTEE COORDINATORS EPP S&D ECR ALDE GUE/NGL GREENS/ EFDD EFA IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AFET DEVE INTA BUDG CONT ECON EMPL ENVI ITRE IMCO CRISTIAN DAVOR IVO DANIEL JOSÉ MANUEL PETRI BURKHARD DAVID PETER KRIŠJĀNIS ANDREAS DAN PREDA STIER CASPARY FERNANDES SARVAMAA BALZ CASA LIESE KARIŅŠ SCHWAB Romania / EPP Croatia / EPP Germany / EPP Portugal / EPP Finland / EPP Germany / EPP Malta / EPP Germany / EPP Latvia / EPP Germany / EPP Deputy: Deputy: Deputy: Deputy: Deputy: Deputy: Deputy: Deputies: Deputies: Deputy: RÓŻA GRÄFIN VON ARNAUD DANJEAN BOGDAN BRUNON WENTA CHRISTOFER FJELLNER JAN MARIAN OLBRYCHT MONICA MACOVEI PABLO ZALBA BIDEGAIN HEINZ K. BECKER IVO BELET PAUL RÜBIG THUN UND HOHENSTEIN ELISABETH KÖSTINGER CHRISTIAN EHLER RICHARD NORBERT DAVID EIDER GARDIAZÁBAL INÉS AYALA PERVENCHE JUTTA EVELYNE HOWITT NEUSER MARTIN RUBIAL SENDER BERÈS STEINRUCK MATTHIAS DAN GEBHARDT United Kingdom / S&D Germany / S&D United Kingdom / S&D Spain / S&D Spain / S&D France / S&D Germany / S&D GROOTE NICA Germany / S&D Germany / S&D Romania / S&D CHARLES NIRJ EMMA BERND RYSZARD KAY ANTHEA ANDRZEJ TANNOCK DEVA MCCLARKIN KÖLMEL CZARNECKI SWINBURNE MCINTYRE JULIE MAREK JÓZEF DUDA United Kingdom / ECR United Kingdom / ECR United Kingdom / ECR Germany / ECR Poland / ECR United Kingdom / ECR United Kingdom / ECR GIRLING GRÓBARCZYK Poland / ECR Deputy: Deputy: Deputy: DAVID CAMPBELL United Kingdom / ECR Poland / ECR BAS BELDER KAROL KARSKI BANNERMAN GÉRARD MICHAEL SYLVIE MARIAN Deputy: DITA DEPREZ THEURER GOULARD HARKIN GERBEN-JAN EVŽEN TOŠENOVSKÝ
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Resource Grab Vested Interests at Work in the European Parliament
    Europe's Resource Grab Vested interests at work in the European Parliament Corporate Europe Observatory, 27 June 2011 On 30 June, the European Parliament’s industry, energy and research committee (ITRE) is due to vote on the EU’s Raw Materials Initiative, establishing guidelines for Europe's future policy on natural resource use. The Parliament’s report could effectively give the green light to mining in protected European nature reserves as well as a resource grab in Asia, Africa, the Americas and the Arctic. The vote follows fierce calls from a number of MEPs with close links to industry for European big business to be allowed to exploit other countries’ raw materials without any restrictions – via trade, development and even military policies. MEPs have also tried to block strong language in the report on the need to stop corporate abuse in the extraction sector and to reduce Europe’s over- consumption of raw materials. Several of the MEPs pushing this aggressive agenda are from the European People’s Party (EPP) and have close links to industry sectors which have a vested interest in the raw materials debate (Bendt Bendtsen – Denmark; Herbert Reul and Daniel Caspary – Germany). Others such as Paul Rübig MEP (EPP, Austria) seem to have clear conflicts of interest1. Rübig profits from companies which depend heavily on the access to cheap raw materials. He also has close connections with industry lobby groups which have tried to shape the EU’s Raw Materials Initiative. Nonetheless, Rübig is one of the lead persons in the debate in Parliament and has set up a cross-party group of MEPs, the European Raw Materials Group, which will follow the issue, working closely with a parallel industry group.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment 171 Dieter-Lebrecht Koch Daniel Caspary Georges
    27.6.2018 A8-0206/171 Amendment 171 Dieter-Lebrecht Koch Daniel Caspary Georges Bach Joachim Zeller Werner Kuhn Sven Schulze Thomas Mann Peter Liese David McAllister Norbert Lins Peter Jahr Sabine Verheyen Angelika Niebler Axel Voss Albert Deß Birgit Collin-Langen Christian Ehler Pascal Arimont Hermann Winkler Reimer Böge Jens Gieseke Elmar Brok Ivo Belet Tom Vandenkendelaere Markus Pieper Monika Hohlmeier Ingeborg Gräßle Markus Ferber Esther de Lange Elisabetta Gardini Massimiliano Salini Alain Lamassoure Renate Sommer Salvatore Domenico Pogliese Burkhard Balz Herbert Dorfmann Lorenzo Cesa Frank Engel Viviane Reding Report A8-0206/2018 Merja Kyllönen Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector (COM(2017)0278 - C8-0170/2017 - 2017/0121(COD)) AM\P8_AMA(2018)0206(171-174)EN.docx PE621.702v01-00 EN United in diversity EN Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Member States shall not apply points (b) Member States shall not apply Directive and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 96/71/EC to drivers on transit journeys. 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in Nor shall they apply points (b) and (c) of the road transport sector employed by the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of undertakings referred to in Article 1(3)(a) Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in the road of that Directive, when performing transport sector employed by undertakings international carriage operations as defined referred to in Article 1(3)(a) of that by Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 Directive, when performing international where the period of posting to their carriage operations as defined by territory to perform these operations is Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 shorter than or equal to 3 days during a where the period of posting to their period of one calendar month.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin Conference 2020 a New Culture of Common Responsibilities for a Europe Bottom-Up Online Working Conference Towards an Action Agenda 2020 - 2023
    Cooperating Partner: Berlin Conference 2020 A new Culture of Common Responsibilities for a Europe Bottom-up Online Working conference towards an Action Agenda 2020 - 2023 Sunday, 8 November 2020 10.00 – 12.00 Working Groups Please find detailed information in the document “Working Groups” 12.30 – 14.00 Cites for Europe – the Responsibility of Cities for Europe In the opening plenary session representatives* of local governments and citizens from all over Europe share their views on the role of cities and regions in a Europe Bottom Up process. Opening Speech by Michael Müller, Governing Mayor of Berlin, Discussion with European Mayors and City Representatives: Luca Bergamo, Rome, Italy; Emil Boc, Cluj-Napoca; Romania; Jacek Jaskowiak, Pozen, Poland; Katrine Nödtvedt, Bergen, Norway; Mohamed Ridouani Leuven, Belgium; Krzysztof Soska, Szczecin, Poland; Maximilian Wonke, Panketal, Germany with Rosa Balas Torres, Director-General for External Relations of the Regional Government of Extremadura; Martin Guillermo, General Secretary of European Border Regions and Lena Düpont, Member of the European Parliament Moderation: Volker Hassemer, Stiftung Zukunft Berlin 14.15 – 15.30 Working Groups Please find detailed information in the document “Working Groups” 16.00 – 18.00 Plenary discussion of European Citizen Initiatives Presentation of the results of the working groups and discussion of the citizens Initiatives on the draft of a common Action Agenda for a Europe bottom-up. (see the Action Agenda attached) Cooperating Partner: Monday, 9 November 2020 09:30 – 11.00 Europe Bottom-up - Visions for the Success of Europe? A new culture of shared responsibility for Europe is emerging in civil society, not least because of the belief in personal civic responsibility.
    [Show full text]