1995 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1995 Annual Report 203 –1155 W. Pender St. Vancouver B.C. V6E 2P4 604 482 9200, Fax 604 482 9222 [email protected]. www.bctreaty.net Annual Report 1995 Former Commissioners’ Remarks The British Columbia Treaty Commission has entered its third year as the facilitator of treaty making in British Columbia. Under an agreement signed by three Principals-the Governments of Canada and British Columbia and the First Nations Summit-the Treaty Commission is required to submit an annual report to the Principals on the progress of negotiations and on the operations of the Commission. This Annual Report also serves to provide information to the public about the role of the B.C. Treaty Commission and the status of the treaty negotiation process in British Columbia. Annual financial statements have been prepared to coincide with the March 31 fiscal year-end of the Governments of Canada and British The process Columbia. The financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, provides a solid 1995 are submitted as a separate document. structure for negotiations, but It is our pleasure to submit this second Annual Report of the British the relationships Columbia Treaty Commission. upon which this process is based This is an historic process. Finally, First Nations have been able to sit at are fragile. a table with senior representatives of Canada and British Columbia, and begin to discuss issues which have been unresolved for over 140 years. The process provides a solid structure for negotiations, but the relationships upon which this process is based are fragile. This makes the process itself fragile, and all parties must be very careful about how they proceed down this difficult path. First Nations have expressed their clear goals to preserve and protect their cultures. All cultures are based on the past, and the past can never be forgotten. But all parties must be able to build on the foundations of the past towards new and better relationships. All of the Commissioners believe in this process, and that the challenges we face now and in the future can be met with clear resolve, mutual respect, cooperation and understanding among all those involved. 203 –1155 W. Pender St. Vancouver B.C. V6E 2P4 604 482 9200, Fax 604 482 9222 [email protected]. www.bctreaty.net Annual Report 1995 1994 – 1995 in Review The role of the B.C. Treaty Commission is to facilitate and manage a six-stage process to negotiate treaties in British Columbia. The process is to be voluntary, fair, impartial, effective and understandable. THE COMMISSIONERS The first Commissioners were appointed on April 15, 1993. First they established the Commission's policies, initial procedures and priorities. Then the Commission invited First Nations to enter the process, starting December 15, 1993. By June 15, 1994, six months after the process was opened, 41 First Nations had chosen to come to the negotiating table. These First Nations were identified in the first Annual Report of the Commission. A number of changes took place within the Commission: - CJ. (Chuck) Connaghan, who served as the first Chief Commissioner, retired from that post on December 31, 1994. - Mr. Connaghan was succeeded by Alec C. Robertson, Q.C., who took office on May 15,1995. In the interim, Barbara L. Fisher served as Acting Chief Commissioner; - Commissioners Dr. Lorne Greenaway and Art Sterritt retired from the Commission on April 14, 1995, at the end of their terms of appointment; - Dr. Peter Lusztig was appointed to the Commission by Canada, Wilf Adam was elected and Carole Corcoran was re-elected by the First Nations Summit; and, - Barbara Fisher was reappointed by B.C. THE SIX STAGES The process has six stages as follows: 1. The Statement of Intent 2. Preparation for Negotiations 3. Negotiation of a Framework Agreement 4. Negotiation of an Agreement in Principle 5. Negotiation to Finalize a Treaty 6. Implementation of the Treaty STATUS OF THE PROCESS There are 43 First Nations in the process. This number reflects several changes in the composition of some First Nations since the first Annual Report. The Commissioners expect more First Nations to enter the process in the year ahead. At the end of the Commission's second year of operation, all Commissioners agree that, overall, significant progress has been made. In less than 18 months, representatives of over 65% of the First Nations' population in the province have come to the table to begin negotiating treaties with the Governments of Canada and British Columbia. Until this time, only one First Nation, the Nisga'a, had been at a modern treaty table. The Nisga'a were the first to begin negotiating under Canada's Comprehensive Claims Policy (1976), and they continue in their negotiations outside the Treaty Commission process. Of the 43 First Nations in this process, seven have completed Stage 2 preparations and have progressed with the other two parties into Stage 3, Framework Agreement negotiations. Eleven other First Nations have substantially completed Stage 2 and are working with the federal and provincial negotiators to complete procedural arrangements. Most of these 18 First Nations are expecting to move into Stage 4, substantive Agreement in Principle negotiations, during 1995 - 96. The remaining 25 First Nations in the process are proceeding through Stage 2 and most expect to reach Stage 3 during the year ahead. This is solid evidence that the B.C. Treaty Commission process is working. At the same time, significant challenges have faced the Commission, the Principals and the parties to the negotiations. These challenges include: - Ways to negotiate interim measures agreements so that First Nations interests which may be affected have adequate protection while treaty negotiations proceed; - The need for further public information and education; - The need for continuing consultation by the Governments of Canada and British Columbia with non-aboriginal interests; - A funding program which must allow First Nations to prepare for and negotiate on an equal footing with Canada and British Columbia; - How to manage a process effectively where so many negotiations will be conducted at the same time; and - The need for the Government of Canada to enact legislation creating the B.C. Treaty Commission as a legal entity. 203 –1155 W. Pender St. Vancouver B.C. V6E 2P4 604 482 9200, Fax 604 482 9222 [email protected]. www.bctreaty.net Annual Report 1995 Why Are We Negotiating Treaties? An Historical View It is important for the public to understand the Commission's role in an historic context. In carrying out their duties during the past year, the Commissioners traveled widely in the province and met many individuals and groups of British Columbians. Time and again, Commissioners found people much more willing to accept and support this treaty-making process once they became familiar with the history of the relationship between First Nations and the federal and provincial governments. That relationship has been a troubled one. This was noted in the historic 1991 Report of the British Columbia Claims Task Force. The Task Force Report called for "a new relationship which recognizes the unique place of aboriginal people and First Nations in Canada," a relationship which must be achieved through fair and voluntary negotiations among equal participants. The report adds: " THE STATUS QUO HAS BEEN COSTLY. ENERGIES AND RESOURCES HAVE BEEN SPENT IN LEGAL BATTLES AND OTHER STRATEGIES. IT IS TIME TO PUT THESE RESOURCES AND ENERGIES INTO THE NEGOTIATION OF A CONSTRUCTIVE RELATIONSHIP. " Here is some of the history which led to those conclusions: When European settlers arrived in what became British Columbia, the land was inhabited by many nations of people. Each nation had its own language, its own economy, its own system of laws and government and its own spiritual tradition. The British government's policy in North America, as set out in the Royal Proclamation of 1763, was that only the Crown could acquire land from the aboriginal people, and only by treaty. In eastern Canada and across the prairies, this policy resulted in major treaties by which various First Nations ceded title to their land to the Crown in exchange for substantial land reserves and other rights. On the prairies, the foundations for settling the land question were laid before Confederation. West of the Rockies, James Douglas was directed by the Colonial Office to purchase First Nations lands, first in his capacity as chief factor of the Hudson's Bay Company, and later as Governor of the colony. He arranged fourteen purchases, known as the Douglas Treaties, mostly on southern Vancouver Island. Then money ran out and there were no further purchases. Instead, Governor Douglas made the aboriginal people the same offer that he made to the settlers: if they would leave their homes, acquire Crown land and become farmers, they would be given equal treatment. But traditionally, aboriginal people were not farmers and their values and traditional ways of life made assimilation unlikely. After Governor Douglas retired, the colonial government removed the right of the aboriginal people to acquire Crown land and denied that they had ever owned the land. These issues were not resolved when British Columbia negotiated the Terms of Union with Canada in 1871. Federal negotiators did not consult with the aboriginal people. They wrongly assumed that the 'Indian question' had been resolved by treaties. The Terms of Union gave the province control over the creation of further Indian reserves and gave Canada responsibility for 'Indians and lands reserved for Indians.' This responsibility was carried out through the Indian Act, which imposed the 'band' system of administration on First Nations. Over the decades, First Nations leaders demanded treaties to safeguard the territories of their people. However, the only treaty signed in B.C.
Recommended publications
  • 1996 Annual Report
    203 –1155 W. Pender St. Vancouver B.C. V6E 2P4 604 482 9200, Fax 604 482 9222 [email protected]. www.bctreaty.net Annual Report 1996 Introduction The British Columbia Treaty Commission was appointed on April 15, 1993 under terms of an agreement between the Government of Canada, the Government of British Columbia and the First Nations Summit, whose members represent the majority of the First Nations in British Columbia. The terms of agreement require the Commission to submit annually to the Parliament of Canada, the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia and the First Nations Summit "a report on the progress of negotiations and an evaluation of the process." The annual financial data has been prepared to coincide with the fiscal year-end of the Governments of Canada and British Columbia and is submitted as a separate document. It is my pleasure to submit the third Annual Report of the British Columbia Treaty Commission. As Chief Commissioner, I wish to express my thanks to my fellow Commissioners, and to the men and women who comprise the Commission's staff, for their hard work, commitment and support. Alec Robertson, Q.C. Chief Commissioner 203 –1155 W. Pender St. Vancouver B.C. V6E 2P4 604 482 9200, Fax 604 482 9222 [email protected]. www.bctreaty.net Annual Report 1996 Executive Summary As the independent and impartial keeper of the process, the British Columbia Treaty Commission is pleased to report that significant progress has been made over the past year in those treaty negotiations which it facilitates. There are 22 First Nations tables in Stage 3 framework negotiations and 11 in Stage 4, agreement in principle negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Federal/Provincial Consultation and Accommodation Report for the Trans Mountain Expension Project
    Joint Federal/Provincial Consultation and Accommodation Report for the Trans Mountain Expansion Project November 2016 Joint Federal/Provincial Consultation and Accommodation Report for the TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms, Abbreviations and Definitions Used in This Report ...................... xi 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Report ..............................................................................1 1.2 Project Description .................................................................................2 1.3 Regulatory Review Including the Environmental Assessment Process .....................7 1.3.1 NEB REGULATORY REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS ....................7 1.3.2 BRITISH COLUMBIA’S ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS ...............................8 1.4 NEB Recommendation Report.....................................................................9 2. APPROACH TO CONSULTING ABORIGINAL GROUPS ........................... 12 2.1 Identification of Aboriginal Groups ............................................................. 12 2.2 Information Sources .............................................................................. 19 2.3 Consultation With Aboriginal Groups ........................................................... 20 2.3.1 PRINCIPLES INVOLVED IN ESTABLISHING THE DEPTH OF DUTY TO CONSULT AND IDENTIFYING THE EXTENT OF ACCOMMODATION ........................................ 24 2.3.2 PRELIMINARY
    [Show full text]
  • A GUIDE to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013)
    A GUIDE TO Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013) A GUIDE TO Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013) INTRODUCTORY NOTE A Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia is a provincial listing of First Nation, Métis and Aboriginal organizations, communities and community services. The Guide is dependent upon voluntary inclusion and is not a comprehensive listing of all Aboriginal organizations in B.C., nor is it able to offer links to all the services that an organization may offer or that may be of interest to Aboriginal people. Publication of the Guide is coordinated by the Intergovernmental and Community Relations Branch of the Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation (MARR), to support streamlined access to information about Aboriginal programs and services and to support relationship-building with Aboriginal people and their communities. Information in the Guide is based upon data available at the time of publication. The Guide data is also in an Excel format and can be found by searching the DataBC catalogue at: http://www.data.gov.bc.ca. NOTE: While every reasonable effort is made to ensure the accuracy and validity of the information, we have been experiencing some technical challenges while updating the current database. Please contact us if you notice an error in your organization’s listing. We would like to thank you in advance for your patience and understanding as we work towards resolving these challenges. If there have been any changes to your organization’s contact information please send the details to: Intergovernmental and Community Relations Branch Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation PO Box 9100 Stn Prov.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors Regular - 15 Aug 2019 - Minutes DRAFT
    THOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT Regular Meeting – THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 A G E N D A Time: 1:15 PM Place: Board Room 4th Floor 465 Victoria Street Kamloops, BC Page 1 CALL TO ORDER 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS (If Required) 3 CHAIR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS 4 ADDITIONS TO OR DELETIONS FROM THE AGENDA 5 MINUTES 11 - 25 5.a 2019 August 15 Regular Board Meeting Minutes DRAFT Attachments: Board of Directors Regular - 15 Aug 2019 - Minutes DRAFT RECOMMENDATION: THAT the minutes of the August 15, 2019 Regular Board Meeting be adopted. 26 - 27 5.b 2019 August 15 Record of Thompson-Nicola Regional District Public Hearing Zoning Bylaw Amendment No. 2685, 2019 Zoning Amendment No. BA 177 Attachments: Public Hearing BA177 - 15 Aug 2019 - Minutes DRAFT RECOMMENDATION: THAT the Record of August 15, 2019 Public Hearing on Zoning Bylaw Amendment No. 2685, 2019, Zoning Amendment No. BA 177, be accepted as recorded. Agenda – Board of Directors Regular Meeting Thursday, September 19, 2019 28 - 29 5.c 2019 August 15 Record of Thompson-Nicola Regional District Public Hearing Cherry Creek - Savona OCP Amendment Bylaw No. 2688, 2019 Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 2689, 2019, Application No. BA 178 Attachments: Public Hearing BA178 - 15 Aug 2019 - Minutes DRAFT RECOMMENDATION: THAT the Record of August 15, 2019 Public Hearing on Cherry Creek - Savona OCP Amendment Bylaw No. 2688, 2019, Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 2689, 2019, Application No. BA 178 be accepted as recorded. 6 BYLAWS (From Public Hearing - If Required) 7 DELEGATIONS 30 - 68 7.a Tourism and Destination Development Strategy Update Cariboo Chilcotin Coast Tourism Association Jolene Lammers, Destination Development Coordinator Attachments: Cariboo-Chilcotin Coast Tourism Association Request for Letter of Support 7.b Roadside Weed Control Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Graham Gielens, Manager, Roadside Development 8 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 69 - 76 8.a Financial Request - 2019 BC Agricultural Exhibition Evelyn Pilatzke, President BC Agricultural Exhibition Society Report by the Director of Finance dated August 16, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • TMX Consultation Reference: Ts'kw'aylaxw (Pavillion Indian Band)
    Appendix B.26 - Ts'kw'aylaxw First Nation (Pavilion Indian Band) I - Background Information Ts'kw'aylaxw First Nation (Ts’kw’aylaxw) (pronounced “TS-KWHY-lux”), also known as Pavilion Indian Band, is located in the south central interior of British Columbia (BC), approximately 40 kilometres (km) northwest of Lillooet and 70 km west of Cache Creek. The Ts’kw’aylaxw is a Secwepemc (pronounced “Shi-HUEP-muh” or “She-KWE-pem”) (Shuswap) group, historically part of the ethnographic “Bonaparte Division” and over time, through intermarriage, the Ts'kw'aylaxw were absorbed by the St’at’imc (Lillooet) Nations, specifically associated with the Fraser River Band (šλáλimx?úl) of the upper division of the St'at'imc. The Ts’kw’aylaxw are a member of the St'át'imc Chiefs Council. Ts'kw'aylaxw has eight reserves: Leon Creek no.2 (472.5 hectares [ha]), Leon Creek no.2A (176.4 ha), Marble Canyon no.3 (263.1 ha), Pavilion no.1 (881.2 ha), Pavilion no.1A (16.2 ha), Pavilion no.3A (256.2 ha), Pavilion no.4 (45.3 ha), and Ts’kw’aylaxw no.5 (16.1 ha) but resides on only four of the reserves. Ts'kw'aylaxw has a total registered population of 567 (197 [35%] are living on their reserve, 77 [14%] are living on other reserves, and 293 [52%] are living off reserve). The closest community/reserve is located 85 km away from the pipeline right of way (RoW). Ts'kw'aylaxw submitted a Statement of Intent (SOI) to the BC Treaty Commission (BCTC) on October 11, 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Case Book - Secwepemc Stories and Legal Traditions Stsmémelt Project Tek’Wémiple7 Research
    Tribal Case Book - Secwepemc Stories and Legal Traditions Stsmémelt Project Tek’wémiple7 Research Created by: Kelly Connor, B.A. (Hons), M.A. Researcher 2/7/2013 Table of Contents 1.0 Background........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Secwepemc Overview...................................................................................................1 1.2 Stsmémelt Tek’wémiple7 Overview.......................................................................4 1.3 Pillars of Jurisdiction.....................................................................................................5 1.4 Seven Sacred Laws.........................................................................................................6 2.0 Research Methods............................................................................................................7 2.1 Purpose................................................................................................................................7 2.2 Rationale.............................................................................................................................7 2.2.1 Indigenous Legal Traditions................................................................7 2.2.2 Why Stories?...............................................................................................8 2.2.3 Legal Analysis and Synthesis Methodology..................................9 2.3 Activities...........................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Contamination Identification and Assessment Plan for the Trans Mountain Pipeline Ulc Trans Mountain Expansion Project Neb Condition 46
    CONTAMINATION IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR THE TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE ULC TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT NEB CONDITION 46 August 2017 REV 4 687945 01-13283-GG-0000-CHE-RPT-0036 R4 DRAFT for Review Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. Suite 2700, 300 – 5th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 5J2 Ph: 403-514-6400 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Contamination Identification and Assessment Plan Trans Mountain Expansion Project 687945/August 2017 TABLE OF CONCORDANCE National Energy Board (NEB) Condition 46 is applicable to the following legal instruments: OC-064 (CPCN), AO-003-OC-2 (OC2), AO-002-OC-49 (OC49), XO-T260-007-2016 (Temp), XO-T260-008-2016 (Pump 1), XO-T260-009-2016 (Pump 2), XO-T260-010-2016 (Tanks) and MO-015-2016 (Deact). Table 1 describes how this Plan addresses the Condition requirements applicable to Project activities. TABLE 1 LEGAL INSTRUMENT CONCORDANCE WITH NEB CONDITION 46: CONTAMINATION IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT PLAN OC-064 AO-003-OC-2 (OC2) AO-002-OC-49 XO-T260-007-2016 XO-T260-008-2016 XO-T260-009-2016 XO-T260-010-2016 MO-015_2016 NEB Condition 46 (CPCN) (OC49) (Temp) (Pump1) (Pump2) (Tanks) (Deact) Trans Mountain must file with the NEB for approval, at least 4 months prior to Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this Plan Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this Plan Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this Plan Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this Plan Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this Plan Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this Plan Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this Plan Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this Plan commencing construction, a Contamination Identification
    [Show full text]
  • RIGHTS in BRITISHCOLUMBIA a Historical Summary of the Rz&Ht.Sof the Pavibon First Nation
    FIRSTNATIONS WATER RIGHTS IN BRITISHCOLUMBIA A Historical Summary of the rz&ht.sof the Pavibon First Nation Management and Standards Branch Copy NOT TO BE REMOVED FROM THE OFFICE BRITISH Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, LANDS, AND PARKS WATER MANAGEMENT BRANCH FIRST NATIONS WATER RIGHTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA: A Historical Summary of the rigkts of tke Pavilion First Nation Prepared by: Gary W. Robinson Daniela Mops Edited by: Diana Jolly and Miranda Griffith Reviewed by: Gary W. Robinson February 18,1997 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Robinson, G. (Gary), 1949- First Nations water rights in British Columbia. A historical summary of the rights of the Pavilion First Nation ISBN 0-7726-3364-9 1. Water rights - British Columbia - Pavilion Indian Reserve No. 1. 2. Water rights - British Columbia - Pavilion Indian Reserve No. 1A. 3. Water rights - British Columbia - Leon Creek Indian Reserve No. 2. 4. Water rights - British Columbia - Marble Canyon Indian Reserve No. 3. I. Mogus, Daniela. 11. Jolly, Diana. 111. Griffith, Miranda. IV. BC Environment. Water Management Branch. V. Title. VI. Title: Historical summary of the rights of the Pavilion First Nation. KEB529.5 .W3R62 ,1997 346.71104’32 C97-960262-9 KF8210.W38R62 1997 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks wishes to acknowledge three partners whose contributions were invaluable in the completion of the Aboriginal Water Rights Report Series: The Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs, was a critical source of funding, support and direction for this project. The U-Vic Geography Co-op Program, was instrumental in providing the staffing resources needed to undertake this challenging task.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans Mountain Attachment 1 Condition 43
    Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Watercourse Crossing Inventory Trans Mountain Expansion Project March 2017 APPENDIX L ABORIGINAL GROUPS TO BE ENGAGED ON NEB CONDITION 43: WATERCOURSE CROSSING INVENTORY Adams Lake Indian Band Aitchelitz First Nation (Stó:lō) Alexander First Nation Alexis Nakota Sioux First Nation Aseniwuche Winewak Nation Ashcroft Indian Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Asini Wachi Nehiyawak Boothroyd Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Boston Bar Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) British Columbia Métis Federation Canim Lake Band (Tsq’escen') Canoe Creek (Stswecem'c Xgat'tem) Indian Band Chawathil First Nation (Stó:lō) Cheam First Nation (Stó:lō) Clinton Indian Band/Whispering Pines First Nation Coldwater Indian Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Cook’s Ferry Indian Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Enoch Cree Nation Ermineskin Cree Nation Foothills Ojibway Society High Bar Horse Lake First Nation (Treaty 8) Kanaka Bar Katzie First Nation Kelly Lake Cree Nation Kelly Lake First Nation Kelly Lake Métis Settlement Society Ktunaxa Nation Kwantlen First Nation (Stó:lō) Kwaw-kwaw-Apilt First Nation (Stó:lō) Kwikwetlem First Nation Leq’a:mel First Nation (Stó:lō) Lheidli T’enneh First Nation Lhtako Dene Nation Little Shuswap Indian Band Louis Bull Tribe Lower Nicola Indian Band (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Lower Similkameen Indian Band Lyackson First Nation Lytton First Nation (Nlaka’pamux Nation) Matsqui First Nation (Stó:lō) Métis Nation of Alberta Gunn Métis Local 55 Métis Nation of British Columbia Métis Regional Council Zone IV of
    [Show full text]
  • B.C. First Nations Pronunciation Guide
    A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and Organizations in BC The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September 2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from this version due to periodic updates that have occurred since then. For changes, please email: [email protected]. This Guide contains aids to the pronunciation of communities and organizations listed in the Excel Database “Guide to Indigenous Organizations and Services in British Columbia” (Previously known as The Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia). The original Pronunciation Guide was created with input from First Nations and other Aboriginal organizations, as well as from the First Peoples’ Cultural Council. British Columbia has a vast wealth of First Nations languages and cultures. There are 7 distinct language families, completely unrelated to each other. Within these families there are 34 different First Nations languages and at least 93 different dialects (varieties) of those languages. Besides these 34 living languages, at least three languages which were spoken in British Columbia are now sleeping.1 All of these languages contain a rich inventory of sounds, many of which are not found in English. When preparing this Guide, we asked representatives to help us understand how to pronounce the traditional name of their community or organization. The pronunciation equivalents we have developed here are meant as an introductory guide. The final authority on a pronunciation rests with the community. We encourage you to gain a first-hand understanding of how a name is pronounced by speaking directly with, and being guided by, representatives from each community.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpt from Crown Consultation and Accommodation Report (CCAR), Page 26
    Excerpt from Crown Consultation and Accommodation Report (CCAR), page 26: After careful consideration, 10 groups were added to the list for inclusion in consultation: Papaschase First Nation Aseniwuche Winewak Nation Driftpile Cree Nation Swan River First Nation Hwlitsum First Nation Tsuu’tina Nation Esk’etemc First Nation Buffalo Lake Métis Settlement East Prairie Métis Settlement Kikino Métis Settlement Saddle Lake Cree Nation and Whitefish (Goodfish) Lake First Nation were consulted as one band during the 2016 consultation process. However, Saddle Lake First Nation requested to be consulted separately for the 2018–2019 process, resulting in another community being added to the list. The Métis Nation of Alberta and the Zone 4 Métis had initially been consulted together but were subsequently consulted separately. As a result, the Crown list increased to a total of 129 Indigenous groups for the 2018–2019 consultation process. Annex A – List of Eligible Communities 2019 Western Approach Ditidaht First Nation Huu-ay-aht First Nations Ka:’yu:’k’t’h’/Che:k’tles7et’h First Nations Pacheedaht First Nation Toquaht Nation Uchucklesaht Tribe Ucluelet First Nation Vancouver Island - South Esquimalt Nation Malahat Nation Pauquachin First Nation Scia’new (Beecher Bay) Indian Band Songhees (Lekwungen) Nation Tsartlip First Nation Tsawout First Nation Tseycum First Nation T’Sou-ke First Nation Southeastern Vancouver Island Cowichan Tribes Halalt First Nation Hwlitsum First Nation Lake Cowichan First Nation Lyackson First Nation Penelakut
    [Show full text]
  • Community Economic Development Projects
    COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 02 December 2014 Prepared for: Northern Economic Development and Initiatives Committee Squamish-Lillooet Regional District c/o District of Lillooet PO Box 610 615 Main Street Lillooet BC V0K 1V0 Prepared by: Fraser Basin Council www.fraserbasin.bc.ca Contact: Mike Simpson, MA, RPF Senior Regional Manager, Thompson 200A - 1383 McGill Road Kamloops BC V2C 6K7 T: (250) 314-9660 [email protected] 1 Executive Summary The Fraser Basin Council (FBC) is under contract with the NEDI Committee, made up of representatives from the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District and the District of Lillooet to conduct four economic development projects including: 1. Project A: Governance Model Feasibility Study for Shared Service Delivery 2. Project B: Community Visioning 3. Project C: Community Asset Inventory 4. Project D: Economic Leakage Analysis Project A – Governance Model Feasibility Study for Shared Service Delivery The feasibility study included conducting a literature review and interviews with other regions that have similar attributes to that of the northern SLRD. The literature along with the interviews revealed similar results, primarily the need for relationships and communication between all of the groups involved in an economic development shared service. The Fraser Basin Council recommends that an economic development steering committee be formed to guide the direction of a shared economic development service with representation from all of the parties involved across the sub-region. During the first year, the development and implementation of the service should be facilitated by a third party, non-profit society. Once the committee membership and service have been established, the committee may form a new non-profit society/join an existing one and hire a staff person to carry out the work, or continue to utilize a third party.
    [Show full text]