BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH Tsuneo Imanaka Toyama University, Japan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH Tsuneo Imanaka Toyama University, Japan Biological1 Research Editor-in-Chief Biological Manuel J. Santos Pontifi cia Universidad Católica de Chile Research Santiago, Chile. is the continuation since 1992 of Associate Editors ARCHIVOS DE BIOLOGÍA Y Gloria Montenegro Pontifi cia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile. MEDICINA EXPERIMENTALES Christian González Universidad de Chile, Chile. founded in 1964 Mauricio González Universidad de Chile, Chile. Founding Editor: Rosalba Lagos Universidad de Chile, Chile. Jorge Mardones Ricardo Moreno Pontifi cia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile. Past Editors: Victoria Velarde Pontifi cia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile. Tito Ureta, Patricio Zapata, Assistants to the Editors Manuel Krauskopf Jorge Garrido Yolanda Zambrano (Production) Rubén Carrasco (Production) George Montgomery (Editing and Proofreading) This Journal is the offi cial organ of the Sociedad de Biología de Chile SOCIEDAD DE BIOLOGÍA DE CHILE Legal personality No 2.521 (4.6.54) Editorial Board RUT 70-397.400-7 Oscar Burrone International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) Legal address: Canadá 308 Trieste, Italy. Santiago 9, Chile Enrique Brandan Pontifi cia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile. (Legal Advisor and Representative) Néstor Bianchi Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular (IMBICE) La Plata, Argentina Jaime Altamirano P. Philipe Bouvet École Normale Supérieure du Lyon, France. Francisco Bozinovic Pontifi cia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile. This journal is partly subsidized by the Juan José Cazzulo Universidad Nacional San Martín, Argentina. “Funds for Publication of Scientific Víctor Cifuentes Universidad de Chile, Chile. Journals” of the National Comission of Inés Contreras Universidad de Chile, Chile Scientifi c and Technological Leopoldo De Meis Universidad Federal Río de Janeiro, Brazil. Research (CONICYT), Chile Sonia Dietrich Institute of Botany, São Paulo, Brazil. Raúl Fernández Donoso Universidad de Chile, Chile. Yearly subscription US$ 250 Gonzalo Gajardo Universidad de Los Lagos, Chile. Payable to Joan Guinovart Universidad de Barcelona, Spain. Sociedad de Biología de Chile Cecilia Hidalgo Universidad de Chile, Chile. Luis Felipe Hinojosa Universidad de Chile, Chile. Correspondence to Carlos Hirschberg Boston University, U.S.A. BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH Tsuneo Imanaka Toyama University, Japan. Sociedad de Biología de Chile Nibaldo Inestrosa Pontifi cia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile. o Canadá 253, piso 3 , Dpto. F. Ramón Latorre Centro de Neurociencia de Valparaíso, Chile. PO Box 16164, Santiago, Chile Sergio Lavandero Universidad de Chile, Chile. Fax (56-2) 225 8427 Lisette Leyton Universidad de Chile, Chile. Phone (56-2) 209 3503 Martín Montecino Universidad de Concepción, Chile. E-mail [email protected] Juan Olate Universidad de Concepción, Chile. Internet: www.biologiachile.cl Adrián Palacios Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile. Manuel Rieber Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científi cas (IVIC) Venezuela. Indexed by Scielo, Medline, Biosis, Gloria Riquelme Universidad de Chile, Chile. Embase, Lilacs, Periodica, Research Alert, Flavio Salazar O. Universidad de Chile, Chile. Science Citation Index Expanded (ISI), José Luis Santos Universidad de Chile, Chile. Web of Science (ISI) M.A.Q. Siddiqui State University of New York, U.S.A. Eugenio Spencer Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Chile. Abstracted in Biological Abstracts, Excerpta Marc Thiry Université de Liège, Belgium. Medica, Index Medicus and Medlars Tito Ureta Universidad de Chile, Chile. ISSN: 0716-9760 Carlos Valenzuela Universidad de Chile, Chile ISSN electronic version: 0717-6287 Pablo Valenzuela Fundación Ciencia para la Vida, Chile. Claudio Vásquez Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Chile. Sociedad de Biología de Chile Directorio Sociedad de Biología de Chile 2011-2012 Mesa Directiva Presidentes de Sociedades Sociedad Chilena de Inmunología Afi liadas Dr. Ángel Oñate Dr. Patricio Ojeda Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas Universidad de Concepción Presidente Sociedad de Ecología de Chile Fono: 56-41-2204118 Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas Dra. Bárbara Saavedra E-mail: [email protected] P. Universidad Católica de Chile Wildlife Conservation Society Alameda 340 Fono: 56-2-6351095 Sociedad Chilena de Evolución Fono: 3542879 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Dr. Pedro Victoriano Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Sociedad de Biología Celular de Chile Oceanográfi cas Dra. Rosalba Lagos Dra. María Rosa Bono Universidad de Concepción Vicepresidenta Facultad de Ciencias Fono: 56-41-2203058 Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Chile E-mail: [email protected] Universidad de Chile Fono: 56-2-9787339 Las Palmeras 3425 E-mail: [email protected] Fono: 9787348 Sociedad de Farmacología de Chile Dr. Juan Carlos Prieto [email protected] Sociedad de Bioquímica y Biología Facultad de Medicina Molecular de Chile Universidad de Chile Dr. Marco Tulio Núñez Dra. Victoria Guixé Fono: 56-2-9786044 Past president Facultad de Ciencias Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Chile E-mail: [email protected] Universidad de Chile Fono: 56-2-9787335 Las Palmeras 3425 E-mail:[email protected] Fono: 9787360 Secciones Sección Zoología [email protected] Sociedad de Reproducción Mauricio Canals y Desarrollo Dr. Héctor Toledo Dra. Carmen Romero Tesorero Facultad de Medicina Facultad de Medicina Hospital Clínico J.J. Aguirre Universidad de Chile Fono: 56-2-9788305 Independencia 1027 E-mail:[email protected] Fono: 9786053 [email protected] Sociedad de Botánica de Chile Dra. Gloria Rojas Villegas Dr. Eduardo Palma Museo Nacional de Historia Natural Secretario Fono: 56-2-6804619 Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas Fax: 56-2-680460 P. Universidad Católica de Chile E-mail: [email protected] Alameda 340 Fono: 3542192 Sociedad Chilena de Ciencias [email protected] Fisiológicas Dr. Julio Alcayaga Dra. María Antonieta Valenzuela Facultad de Ciencias Directora Universidad de Chile Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Fono: 56-2-9787366 Farmacéuticas E-mail: [email protected] Universidad de Chile Vicuña Mackenna 20 Sociedad de Microbiología de Chile Fono: 9782957 Dr. Omar Orellana Orellana [email protected] ICBM- Facultad de Medicina Universidad de Chile Dr. Rodrigo Iturriaga Fono: 56-2-9786325 Director E-mail: [email protected] Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas P. Universidad Católica de Chile Sociedad de Genética de Chile Alameda 340 Dr. Juan Carlos Marín Fono: 3542852 Facultad de Ciencias [email protected] Universidad del Bío-Bío Fono: 56-42-253153 E-mail: [email protected] LIV REUNIÓN ANUAL DE LA SOCIEDAD DE BIOLOGÍA DE CHILE R-3 LIV REUNIÓN ANUAL SOCIEDAD DE BIOLOGÍA DE CHILE V REUNIÓN ANUAL SOCIEDAD CHILENA DE EVOLUCIÓN XVIII REUNIÓN ANUAL SOCIEDAD DE ECOLOGÍA DE CHILE XXII REUNIÓN ANUAL SOCIEDAD BOTÁNICA DE CHILE XLIV REUNIÓN ANUAL SOCIEDAD DE GENÉTICA DE CHILE Hotel Patagónico - Puerto Varas 6 al 9 de noviembre 2011 R-4 LIV REUNIÓN ANUAL DE LA SOCIEDAD DE BIOLOGÍA DE CHILE Auspiciadores GENEXPRESS GENESIS SUDELAB Patrocinantes CONICYT INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS BIOMÉDICAS, ICBM FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE FUNDACIÓN CHILENA PARA LA BIOLOGÍA CELULAR RED LATINOAMERICANA DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS (RELAB) ALFABETA ARTES GRÁFICAS OCEANA ARAUCO FUNDACIÓN OTERO VIZCARRONDO CERVEZAS SALZBURG LIV REUNIÓN ANUAL DE LA SOCIEDAD DE BIOLOGÍA DE CHILE R-5 Conferencias LIV REUNIÓN ANUAL DE LA SOCIEDAD DE BIOLOGÍA DE CHILE R-7 CONFERENCIA INAUGURAL CONFERENCIA SOCIEDAD DE ECOLOGÍA THE ORIGINS OF GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY PATTERNS DE CHILE Wiens, J. J. Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, 11794-5245, U.S.A. CONSERVACIÓN Y POR QUÉ LA CONSERVACIÓN MARINA ES SINGULAR For more than two centuries now, biologists have observed major differences in the number of species in different parts of the Earth. Castilla, J. C. Ph.D, D.Sc. Understanding the underlying causes of differences in species Departamento de Ecología y Núcleo Milenio en Conservación Marina. richness across regions and habitats has become an important Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas. P. Universidad Católica de Chile. research focus in biology, especially ecology. This research has [email protected] taken on increased urgency as global biodiversity is increasingly threatened by human activities. In this talk, I will argue that El concepto biológico-ecológico de Conservación es usado understanding variation in species richness patterns requires por ecólogos, manejadores, legisladores, ecologistas y público consideration of both ecological and evolutionary processes, and en general. Existe diversidad de criterios en su definición y that diversity patterns at most scales are ultimately explained significado; por ejemplo, en función de aproximaciones ético by either differences in the timing of occupation of habitats or filosóficas biocentristas o antropocentristas (o intermedias). regions and/or differences in rates and patterns of diversifi cation Desgraciadamente, la falta de claridad en la definición del (speciation minus extinction). I will discuss recent research from concepto lleva a confundir terminología, como Conservación y my lab aimed at understanding several diverse patterns of species Preservación, y ello no ayuda en el diálogo fructífero. Se hablan richness, using approaches that integrate phylogeny, ecology, idiomas distintos. En forma pionera, la legislación chilena abordó biogeography, and evolutionary processes. I will present examples estas defi niciones en la Ley Nº 18.362 de 1984 “Del Establecimiento
Recommended publications
  • Updated Site Compilation of the Latin American Pollen Database
    PALBO-03688; No of Pages 12 Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology xxx (2015) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/revpalbo Updated site compilation of the Latin American Pollen Database Suzette G.A. Flantua a,⁎, Henry Hooghiemstra a,⁎, Eric C. Grimm b, Hermann Behling c, Mark B. Bush d, Catalina González-Arango e, William D. Gosling a,f, Marie-Pierre Ledru g, Socorro Lozano-García h, Antonio Maldonado i, Aldo R. Prieto j,ValentíRullk, John H. Van Boxel a a Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands b Illinois State Museum, Research and Collections Center, 1011 East Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703, USA c Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute for Plant Sciences, Department of Palynology and Climate Dynamics, Untere Karspüle 2, 37073, Göttingen, Germany d Florida Institute of Technology, Department of Biology, 150 West University Blvd., Melbourne, FL 32901, USA e Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad los Andes, A.A. 4976 Bogotá, Colombia f Department of Environment, Earth and Ecosystems, Center for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research (CEPSAR), The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK g Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, ISEM (UMR 226 — IRD/CNRS/UM2), Place Eugene Bataillon, CC 061, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France h Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F. 04520, Mexico i Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA), Universidad de La Serena, Casilla 599, La Serena, Chile j Laboratorio de Paleoecología y Palinología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, 7600 Mar del Plata, Argentina k Institute of Earth Sciences “Jaume Almera” (ICTJA-CSIC).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Size, Provisioning Frequency, Flock Size and Foraging
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Naturalis Population size, provisioning frequency, flock size and foraging range at the largest known colony of Psittaciformes: the Burrowing Parrots of the north-eastern Patagonian coastal cliffs Juan F. MaselloA,B,C,G, María Luján PagnossinD, Christina SommerE and Petra QuillfeldtF AInstitut für Ökologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany. BEcology of Vision Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, UK. CMax Planck Institute for Ornithology, Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Schlossallee 2, D-78315 Radolfzell, Germany. DFacultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina. EInstitut für Biologie/Verhaltensbiologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. FSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, UK. GCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract.We here describe the largest colony of Burrowing Parrots (Cyanoliseus patagonus), located in Patagonia, Argentina. Counts during the 2001–02 breeding season showed that the colony extended along 9 km of a sandstone cliff facing the Altantic Ocean, in the province of Río Negro, Patagonia, Argentina, and contained 51412 burrows, an estimated 37527 of which were active. To our knowledge, this is largest known colony of Psittaciformes. Additionally, 6500 Parrots not attending nestlings were found to be associated with the colony during the 2003–04 breeding season. We monitored activities at nests and movements between nesting and feeding areas. Nestlings were fed 3–6 times daily. Adults travelled in flocks of up to 263 Parrots to the feeding grounds in early mornings; later in the day, they flew in smaller flocks, making 1–4 trips to the feeding grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Two Endangered Neotropical Parrots Inform in Situ and Ex Situ Conservation Strategies
    diversity Article Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Two Endangered Neotropical Parrots Inform In Situ and Ex Situ Conservation Strategies Carlos I. Campos 1 , Melinda A. Martinez 1, Daniel Acosta 1, Jose A. Diaz-Luque 2, Igor Berkunsky 3 , Nadine L. Lamberski 4, Javier Cruz-Nieto 5 , Michael A. Russello 6 and Timothy F. Wright 1,* 1 Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA; [email protected] (C.I.C.); [email protected] (M.A.M.); [email protected] (D.A.) 2 Fundación CLB (FPCILB), Estación Argentina, Calle Fermín Rivero 3460, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia; [email protected] 3 Instituto Multidisciplinario sobre Ecosistemas y Desarrollo Sustenable, CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Tandil 7000, Argentina; [email protected] 4 San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, San Diego, CA 92027, USA; [email protected] 5 Organización Vida Silvestre A.C. (OVIS), San Pedro Garza Garciá 66260, Mexico; [email protected] 6 Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: A key aspect in the conservation of endangered populations is understanding patterns of Citation: Campos, C.I.; Martinez, genetic variation and structure, which can provide managers with critical information to support M.A.; Acosta, D.; Diaz-Luque, J.A.; evidence-based status assessments and management strategies. This is especially important for Berkunsky, I.; Lamberski, N.L.; species with small wild and larger captive populations, as found in many endangered parrots. We Cruz-Nieto, J.; Russello, M.A.; Wright, used genotypic data to assess genetic variation and structure in wild and captive populations of T.F.
    [Show full text]
  • New National and Regional Bryophyte Records, 63
    Journal of Bryology ISSN: 0373-6687 (Print) 1743-2820 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjbr20 New national and regional bryophyte records, 63 L. T. Ellis, O. M. Afonina, I. V. Czernyadjeva, L. A. Konoreva, A. D. Potemkin, V. M. Kotkova, M. Alataş, H. H. Blom, M. Boiko, R. A. Cabral, S. Jimenez, D. Dagnino, C. Turcato, L. Minuto, P. Erzberger, T. Ezer, O. V. Galanina, N. Hodgetts, M. S. Ignatov, A. Ignatova, S. G. Kazanovsky, T. Kiebacher, H. Köckinger, E. O. Korolkova, J. Larraín, A. I. Maksimov, D. Maity, A. Martins, M. Sim-Sim, F. Monteiro, L. Catarino, R. Medina, M. Nobis, A. Nowak, R. Ochyra, I. Parnikoza, V. Ivanets, V. Plášek, M. Philippe, P. Saha, Md. N. Aziz, A. V. Shkurko, S. Ştefănuţ, G. M. Suárez, A. Uygur, K. Erkul, M. Wierzgoń & A. Graulich To cite this article: L. T. Ellis, O. M. Afonina, I. V. Czernyadjeva, L. A. Konoreva, A. D. Potemkin, V. M. Kotkova, M. Alataş, H. H. Blom, M. Boiko, R. A. Cabral, S. Jimenez, D. Dagnino, C. Turcato, L. Minuto, P. Erzberger, T. Ezer, O. V. Galanina, N. Hodgetts, M. S. Ignatov, A. Ignatova, S. G. Kazanovsky, T. Kiebacher, H. Köckinger, E. O. Korolkova, J. Larraín, A. I. Maksimov, D. Maity, A. Martins, M. Sim-Sim, F. Monteiro, L. Catarino, R. Medina, M. Nobis, A. Nowak, R. Ochyra, I. Parnikoza, V. Ivanets, V. Plášek, M. Philippe, P. Saha, Md. N. Aziz, A. V. Shkurko, S. Ştefănuţ, G. M. Suárez, A. Uygur, K. Erkul, M. Wierzgoń & A. Graulich (2020): New national and regional bryophyte records, 63, Journal of Bryology, DOI: 10.1080/03736687.2020.1750930 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2020.1750930 Published online: 18 May 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Parrots in the London Area a London Bird Atlas Supplement
    Parrots in the London Area A London Bird Atlas Supplement Richard Arnold, Ian Woodward, Neil Smith 2 3 Abstract species have been recorded (EASIN http://alien.jrc. Senegal Parrot and Blue-fronted Amazon remain between 2006 and 2015 (LBR). There are several ec.europa.eu/SpeciesMapper ). The populations of more or less readily available to buy from breeders, potential factors which may combine to explain the Parrots are widely introduced outside their native these birds are very often associated with towns while the smaller species can easily be bought in a lack of correlation. These may include (i) varying range, with non-native populations of several and cities (Lever, 2005; Butler, 2005). In Britain, pet shop. inclination or ability (identification skills) to report species occurring in Europe, including the UK. As there is just one parrot species, the Ring-necked (or Although deliberate release and further import of particular species by both communities; (ii) varying well as the well-established population of Ring- Rose-ringed) parakeet Psittacula krameri, which wild birds are both illegal, the captive populations lengths of time that different species survive after necked Parakeet (Psittacula krameri), five or six is listed by the British Ornithologists’ Union (BOU) remain a potential source for feral populations. escaping/being released; (iii) the ease of re-capture; other species have bred in Britain and one of these, as a self-sustaining introduced species (Category Escapes or releases of several species are clearly a (iv) the low likelihood that deliberate releases will the Monk Parakeet, (Myiopsitta monachus) can form C). The other five or six¹ species which have bred regular event.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Species I Have Seen World List
    bird species I have seen U.K tally: 276 US tally: 394 Total world: 1,495 world list 1. Abyssinian ground hornbill 2. Abyssinian longclaw 3. Abyssinian white-eye 4. Acorn woodpecker 5. African black-headed oriole 6. African drongo 7. African fish-eagle 8. African harrier-hawk 9. African hawk-eagle 10. African mourning dove 11. African palm swift 12. African paradise flycatcher 13. African paradise monarch 14. African pied wagtail 15. African rook 16. African white-backed vulture 17. Agami heron 18. Alexandrine parakeet 19. Amazon kingfisher 20. American avocet 21. American bittern 22. American black duck 23. American cliff swallow 24. American coot 25. American crow 26. American dipper 27. American flamingo 28. American golden plover 29. American goldfinch 30. American kestrel 31. American mag 32. American oystercatcher 33. American pipit 34. American pygmy kingfisher 35. American redstart 36. American robin 37. American swallow-tailed kite 38. American tree sparrow 39. American white pelican 40. American wigeon 41. Ancient murrelet 42. Andean avocet 43. Andean condor 44. Andean flamingo 45. Andean gull 46. Andean negrito 47. Andean swift 48. Anhinga 49. Antillean crested hummingbird 50. Antillean euphonia 51. Antillean mango 52. Antillean nighthawk 53. Antillean palm-swift 54. Aplomado falcon 55. Arabian bustard 56. Arcadian flycatcher 57. Arctic redpoll 58. Arctic skua 59. Arctic tern 60. Armenian gull 61. Arrow-headed warbler 62. Ash-throated flycatcher 63. Ashy-headed goose 64. Ashy-headed laughing thrush (endemic) 65. Asian black bulbul 66. Asian openbill 67. Asian palm-swift 68. Asian paradise flycatcher 69. Asian woolly-necked stork 70.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction and Molt in the Burrowing Parrot.-The Burrowing Parrot (Cyunoliseus Patugonus) Has One of the Southernmostranges of Neotropicalparrots
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 107 Wilson Bull., 99(l), 1987, pp. 107-109 Reproduction and molt in the Burrowing Parrot.-The Burrowing Parrot (Cyunoliseus patugonus) has one of the southernmostranges of neotropicalparrots. In Argentina, it occurs from the arid Andean slopesin the northwest (24”s) to the Patagonian steppe in the south (46%) (Forshaw 1978). The parrot, which nests colonially in burrows dug into cliff faces,is shot as an agricultural pest and has recently been exported in large numbers for the pet trade, causinglocal declines in its population (Ridgely 1980). Here, we report on the cycle of wild BurrowingParrots in terms of changesin body weight, fat deposits,gonadal condition, and molt. Study area and methods. -The study area was between 33” and 33”3O’Sand 66” and 67”W in the plains near the Sierras de San Luis, San Luis province, central Argentina. The pre- dominant vegetation is an open dry woodland savanna mixed with grasslands.Dominant tree speciesinclude Geofroea decorticans, Prosopis caldenia, P. chilensis, and P. jlexuosa, all of whose fruits are eaten by Burrowing Parrots. Annual rainfall, which is concentratedin the summer (November-April), averages69.5 cm. Mean annual temperatureis 17°C (Instituto National de TecnologiaAgropecuaria, Villa Mercedes Experimental Station, 30 km east of the study area). We obtained parrots from farmers involved in control campaigns,as the Burrowing Parrot is considereda pest by local authorities. We obtained 7-35 parrots monthly from September 1978 to August 1979, with the exception of December 1978, when only two birds were obtained. Birds came from Paso de las Carretas,near Eleodoro Lobos, except in May, June, and July 1979, when all but a few parrots had left the area, and the sample was completed with birds obtained in Alto Pencoso,about 100 km west.
    [Show full text]
  • Nesting Success and Productivity of Tucuman Parrots (Amazona Tucumana) in High-Altitude Forests of Argentina: Do They Differ from Lowland Amazona Parrots?
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Emu http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MU12062 Nesting success and productivity of Tucuman Parrots (Amazona tucumana) in high-altitude forests of Argentina: do they differ from lowland Amazona parrots? Luis RiveraA,D, Natalia Politi A, Enrique H. Bucher B and Anna Pidgeon C AFacultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, CONICET, Alberdi 47, S. S. de Jujuy (4600), Jujuy, Argentina. BCentro de Zoología Aplicada, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CONICET, Casilla de Correo 122, Córdoba (5000), Argentina. CDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin – Madison, 120 Russell Laboratories, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, WI 53706-1598, USA. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Most of our knowledge of reproduction of wild parrots in the Neotropics comes from studies of tropical lowland species, with few studies addressing species of high-altitude forests. We studied the reproductive biology of Tucuman Parrots (Amazona tucumana) in north-western Argentina between 2004 and 2009. We obtained data on reproductive output for 86 nests and on causes of mortality for 94 nests. Mean clutch-size per nesting attempt was 3.6 eggs Æ 1.0 (s.d.). Hatching success (proportion of eggs laid that hatch) was 0.77 Æ 0.17. Fledging success (proportion of nestlings that fledge) was 0.83 Æ 0.13. The overall breeding success (mean number of fledglings per laying female per year) was 2.3 Æ 0.8. Overall finite nesting success (daily survival rate to the power of the nesting length) was 0.53 Æ 0.27, and chick finite nesting success rate was 0.74 Æ 0.22.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects Found in Birds' Nests from Argentina
    Zootaxa 2728: 1–22 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Insects found in birds’ nests from Argentina. Cyanoliseus patagonus (Vieillot, 1818) [Aves: Psittacidae], with the description of Cyanolicimex patagonicus, gen. n., sp. n., and a key to the genera of Haematosiphoninae (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) OSVALDO DI IORIO1, PAOLA TURIENZO1, JUAN MASELLO2, & DIEGO L. CARPINTERO3 1 Entomología. Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. 4° Piso, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Schlossallee 2, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 3División Entomología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Avenida Ángel Gallardo 470 ,1405 Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract The Burrowing Parrot, Cyanoliseus patagonus (Vieillot, 1817) [Aves: Psittacidae], is one of the most southern Neotropical parrots. They require sandstone, limestone, or earth cliffs where they excavate their colonial nest-burrows. Adult C. p. patagonus excavate their own nest-burrows, most of them about 1.5 m deep.Each burrow is occupied by a single pair that lay one clutch of two to five eggs per year, directly on the sand of the breeding chamber. The breeding birds abandon the place until the start of the next breeding attempt in the following year. Burrow nests from Río Negro province (Argentina) are inhabited by two ectoparasitic insects, the flea Hectopsylla narium (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae), and Cyanolicimex patagonicus, gen. n., sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal and Legal Parrot Trade Shows a Long-Term, Cross-Cultural Preference for the Most Attractive Species Increasing Their Risk of Extinction
    Illegal and Legal Parrot Trade Shows a Long-Term, Cross-Cultural Preference for the Most Attractive Species Increasing Their Risk of Extinction Jose´ L. Tella*, Fernando Hiraldo Department of Conservation Biology, Estacio´n Biolo´gica de Don˜ana (CSIC), Sevilla, Spain Abstract Illegal trade constitutes a major threat for a variety of wildlife. A criminology framework has been recently applied to parrot poaching in Mexico, suggesting an opportunistic crime in which the most abundant and accessible species, and not the rare or highly priced species, were poached more often. We analyzed this information, together with additional long-term data (1981–2005) on both the legal and illegal trade of the 22 Mexican parrot species (n = 31,019 individuals), using multivariate statistics and hypothesis-testing approaches. Our results showed a selective capture of parrot species attending to their attractiveness. Parrot species widely differed in attractiveness to people (as reflected by their combined measures of body size, coloration, and ability to imitate human speech), and their attractiveness strongly correlated with their prices both in the Mexican and US markets. The most attractive and valuable species (amazons and macaws) were disproportionally caught attending to the number of years they were legally trapped. Similar patterns were found for parrots poached for the domestic Mexican market, for those smuggled to the USA, and for those legally exported before or after 1992, when the USA ban led parrot exports to be mostly directed to European countries. Finally, the long-term cross-cultural preference for the most attractive species has led them to be among the most threatened species today.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Revision of the Flea Genus Agastopsylla Jordan & Rothschild
    An Acad Bras Cienc (2020) 92(1): e20181136 DOI 10.1590/0001-3765202020181136 Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências | Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences Printed ISSN 0001-3765 I Online ISSN 1678-2690 www.scielo.br/aabc | www.fb.com/aabcjournal BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Taxonomic revision of the flea genus Running title: The genus Agastopsylla Jordan & Rothschild 1923 Agastopsylla (Siphonaptera: Ctenophthalmidae) Academy Section: Biological sciences MARIA FERNANDA LÓPEZ-BERRIZBEITIA, JULIANA SANCHEZ, RUBÉN M. BARQUEZ & MÓNICA DÍAZ e20181136 Abstract: Fleas of Argentina are receiving renewed systematic interest, but the identification of many species associated with small mammals can be problematic. We review the taxonomy of the flea genus Agastopsylla including the re-description of two 92 (1) species and one subspecies, and designate neotype and neallotype for Agastopsylla 92(1) hirsutior, neotype for Agastopsylla nylota nylota from the “Colección Mamíferos Lillo Anexos” (CMLA), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Argentina, and neotype and neallotype for Agastopsylla pearsoni from the Natural History Museum (London, U.K.). Additionally, a key to identification of the species of Agastopsylla and a distribution map of the species of the genus are included. Key words: fleas, systematic, type specimens, rodents, key identification. INTRODUCTION Agastopsylla guzmani Beaucournu et al. 2011 (Beaucournu et al. 2014, Lareschi et al. 2016). In The genus Agastopsylla Jordan & Rothschild Argentina, only two species and two subspecies, 1923 (family Ctenophthalmidae, subfamily A. b. boxi, A. b. gibbosa and A. pearsoni (Lareschi Ctenophthalminae) is characterized by the et al. 2016) have been recorded. reduction in size and the coloration of the spines There are several issues that hinder the of the genal comb (Hopkins & Rothschild 1966).
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera, Aphididae) De La Región De Aysén Del General Carlos Ibáñez Del Campo, Chile
    Bol. R. Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat., 114, 2020: 37-45 Contribución al conocimiento de la fauna de áfidos (Hemiptera, Aphididae) de la región de Aysén del General Carlos Ibáñez del Campo, Chile Contribution to knowledge of the aphid-fauna (Hemiptera, Aphididae) of the Aysén del General Carlos Ibáñez del Campo region, Chile Juan M. Nieto Nafría1, Jaime Ortego2 & M. Pilar Mier Durante1 1. Departamento de Biodiversidad y Gestión Ambiental. Universidad de León. 24071 León (España). [email protected]; [email protected] 2. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). San Martín, 3853. 5507 Luján de Cuyo (Mendoza, Argentina). [email protected]. Recibido: 15 de enero de 2020. Aceptado:15 de marzo de 2020. Publicado electrónicamente: 30 de marzo de 2020. PALABRAS CLAVE: Áfidos, Pulgones, Fauna, Chile, Región de Aysén del General Carlos Ibáñez del Campo, Provincia de Aysén, Provincia de Capitán Prat, Provincia de Coyhaique, Provincia de General Carrera. KEYWORDS: Aphids, Fauna, Chile, Aysén del General Carlos Ibáñez del Campo region, Aysén province, Capitán Prat province, Coyhaique province, General Carrera province. RESUMEN Se presenta la lista de las especies de pulgones o áfidos (Hemiptera, Aphididae) que se conocen en la región de Aysén del General Carlos Ibáñez del Campo (Chile), formada por 61 especies. De ellas, 49 se conocían en la región a finales de 2019, y 12 se citan ahora por primera vez como consecuencia del estudio de ejemplares colectados durante enero de 2019. Uroleucon patagonicum se cita por primera vez en Chile. Se precisan las provincias (Aysén, Capitán Prat, Coyhaique y General Carrera) en las que cada una de las especies ha sido citada previamente o se cita por vez primera.
    [Show full text]