Fly Quiet Program Chicago O’Hare International Airport

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fly Quiet Program Chicago O’Hare International Airport 2020 Annual Report Fly Quiet Program Chicago O’Hare International Airport Visit the O’Hare Noise Webpage on the Internet at www.flychicago.com/oharenoise 2020 Annual Report BACKGROUND On June 17, 1997, the City of Chicago announced that airlines operating at Chicago O’Hare International Airport had agreed to use designated noise abatement flight procedures in accordance with the Fly Quiet Program. The Fly Quiet Program was implemented in an effort to further reduce the impacts of aircraft noise on the surrounding neighborhoods. The Fly Quiet Program is a voluntary program that encourages pilots and air traffic controllers to use designated nighttime preferential runways and flight tracks developed by the Chicago Department of Aviation (CDA) in cooperation with the O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission, the airlines, and the air traffic controllers. These preferred routes direct aircraft over less-populated areas, such as forest preserves, highways, as well as commercial and industrial areas. As part of the Fly Quiet Program, the CDA prepares a Fly Quiet Report. This report is shared with CDA staff, the O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission, the airlines, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the general public. The Fly Quiet Report contains detailed information regarding Fly Quiet Mode, runway use, flight operations, flight tracks, and noise complaints and 24-hour tracking of ground run-ups. The data presented in this report is compiled from the Airport Noise Management System (ANMS) and airport operation logs. FLY QUIET MODE The FAA considers nighttime hours as 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.1 It is the CDA’s goal for the Fly Quiet Program to occur during the entire nine-hour nighttime period of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., however due to operational demand by the airlines and traveling public, Fly Quiet is typically limited to a period less than nine hours. Fly Quiet Mode (FQM), the period of time in Fly Quiet, starts each night on or after 10:00 p.m., once demand allows for two departure runways and one arrival runway and allows for the use of the preferential flight tracks as outlined in the CDA’s Fly Quiet Manual. Demand for the majority of the night allows for one arrival runway and one departure runway. Once demand increases in the morning where additional runways are needed and preferential flight tracks can no longer be utilized, Fly Quiet Mode stops. Highlights for 2020 include: Average Start Time: 10:22 p.m. Average Stop Time: 6:28 a.m. Average Nightly Time in FQM: 8:06 Average Nightly Operations in FQM: 74 1 Airport Noise Compatibility Planning (14 CFR Part 150) Chicago Department of Aviation Page 1 2020 OPERATIONS O’Hare has eight runways that are all utilized at different times depending on a number of conditions including weather, airfield pavement and construction activities, and air traffic demand. The Runway Use Reports disclose runway utilize for the period and compares the average percentage of use for each runway during the current year. The percentage of use for departures and arrivals is shown graphically for each runway. This data is presented for all aircraft types during Fly Quiet Mode. The Nighttime Hourly Operations Report compares the arrivals and departures by hour in 15 minute increments to the current year. Percentage is a ratio whereas a percentage point is the difference between two percentages. Highlights for 2020 include: Departures Arrivals Most used nighttime departure runway: 28R – 47% Most used nighttime arrival runway: 28C – 34% 28C night departures increased by 8pp from 2019 28C night arrivals increased by 7pp from 2019 9R night departures decreased by 11pp from 2019 27L night arrivals decreased 6pp from 2019 pp = Percentage Points Nighttime operations represent 9% of the overall daily operations PREFERENTIAL FLIGHT TRACKS As part of the Fly Quiet Program, the CDA worked with the O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission, the airlines, and the air traffic controllers to identify preferred runways and flight tracks for nighttime operations at O’Hare. The preferred routes direct aircraft over less-populated areas in an effort to limit the effects of noise on the surrounding communities. Adherence to nighttime departure preferential flight tracks is measured by the ANMS. An average deviation graphic and table is provided for all runways. The Nighttime Departure Track Report measures FQM deviation (in nautical miles) from the preferred flight tracks and is divided into three categories: Highlights for 2020 include: Categories Percent Deviation less than 0.5 miles 84% between 0.5 and 1.0 miles 13% greater than 1.0 miles 3% A detailed airline deviation summary is also provided for the current year that shows total arrivals, total departures, and average FQM deviation (in nautical miles) from the preferred flight tracks. Chicago Department of Aviation Page 2 2020 NOISE COMPLAINTS The CDA maintains a toll-free noise hotline (1-800-435-9569) and an online service at www.flychicago.com/oharenoise, and a free CHI 311 mobile app for citizens to express their concern about particular aircraft events or aircraft noise levels in general. The Nighttime Noise Complaint Report summarizes the number of complaints received from households with verifiable addresses and where the households were located. The tables illustrate the method of complaints, and nature of complaints during the specified year. These totals only include complaints made within the State of Illinois to the O’Hare Noise Hotline toll-free number, online service, or CHI 311 mobile app. GROUND RUN-UPS Ground run-ups are aircraft engine tests that are performed to ensure that the engines are working properly after maintenance is performed. Ground run-ups typically occur at night and generate high levels of noise for extended periods of time. In 1997, the CDA constructed a ground run-up enclosure (GRE) at O’Hare to help reduce the noise impacts of ground run-ups on the communities surrounding the airport. This facility was the first of its kind in the United States. When it is not possible to use the GRE, run-ups are performed at one of the four alternative locations. In the fall of 2017, the CDA relocated the GRE from its original location to a new location approximately 1,100 feet to the northeast, but still located on the Scenic Hold Pad. The Airline Ground Run-up Report displays the total number of ground run ups from the current year by airline. The Aircraft Ground Run-up Report displays the total number of ground run ups from the current year by aircraft. Both reports compare the percent utilization of the GRE facility to the percent utilization of other locations for ground run-ups. NOISE The Nighttime Aircraft Noise Report summarizes noise measurements from each of the 36 noise monitors located around O’Hare. The data presented summarizes the Equivalent Sound Level (Leq). Leq is used to identify the average sound level over a given period of time (in this case 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) and is the metric used for this analysis as it is the most appropriate noise measure for periods of time less than 24 hours. Chicago Department of Aviation Page 3 2020 Nighttime Hourly Operations Report Chicago O'Hare International Airport Period: January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 Time of Day: 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Average Arrivals and Departures by Hour FQM START FQM STOP 25 10:22 PM 6:28 AM 20 15 Average Fly Quiet Duration – 8:06, 74 Operations 10 5 0 5 Average Average Daily Operations 10 15 20 Nighttime Duration – 9:00, 121 Operations 25 10 p.m. 11 p.m. 12 a.m. 1 a.m. 2 a.m. 3 a.m. 4 a.m. 5 a.m. 6 a.m. 2020 Arrivals 2019 Arrivals 2020 Departures 2019 Departures Chicago Department of Aviation Page 4 2020 Runway Use Report Chicago O'Hare International Airport Period: January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 Time of Day: 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Average Runway Use (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) Source: Airport Noise Management System (ANMS) Runway Utilization 4L 4R 9L 9C 9R 10L 10C 10R 22L 22R 27L 27C 27R 28L 28C 28R Average Daily Departures 2020 1 0 0 0 4 8 3 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 5 23 2019 1 0 0 n/a 24 22 2 0 21 0 0 n/a 0 0 4 55 Average Daily Arrivals 2020 0 1 1 0 1 4 14 0 0 3 14 0 3 0 24 5 2019 0 1 9 n/a 2 8 41 1 0 2 41 n/a 8 0 44 8 Departures (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) Arrivals (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Percentage Departure Utilization Percentage Arrival Utilization 2020 2020 0 1 # 5 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 7 20 1 1 0 0 47 16 5 6 11 6 20 34 0 0 0 0 # 0 0 0 11 0 2 Runway 9C-27C was commissioned on November 5, 2020. Chicago Department of Aviation Page 5 2020 Runway Use Report Chicago O'Hare International Airport Period: January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 Time of Day: Fly Quiet Mode (FQM) Average Runway Use (FQM) Source: Airport Noise Management System (ANMS) Runway Utilization 4L 4R 9L 9C 9R 10L 10C 10R 22L 22R 27L 27C 27R 28L 28C 28R Average Daily Departures 2020 1 0 0 0 2 5 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 12 2019 0 0 0 n/a 3 7 2 0 4 0 0 n/a 0 0 4 14 Average Daily Arrivals 2020 0 2 0 0 0 3 9 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 15 4 2019 0 1 0 n/a 0 7 17 0 0 1 13 n/a 0 0 18 7 Departures (FQM) Arrivals (FQM) 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Percentage Departure Utilization Percentage Arrival Utilization 2020 2020 0 2 # 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 15 1 1 0 0 41 17 7 10 16 9 22 34 0 0 0 0 # 0 0 0 8 0 4 Runway 9C-27C was commissioned on November 5, 2020.
Recommended publications
  • G410020002/A N/A Client Ref
    Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur G410020002/A N/A Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME G410020002 G410020002 RETURN BIDS TO: Title – Sujet: RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: PURCHASE OF AIR CARRIER FLIGHT MOVEMENT DATA AND AIR COMPANY PROFILE DATA Bids are to be submitted electronically Solicitation No. – N° de l’invitation Date by e-mail to the following addresses: G410020002 July 8, 2019 Client Reference No. – N° référence du client Attn : [email protected] GETS Reference No. – N° de reference de SEAG Bids will not be accepted by any File No. – N° de dossier CCC No. / N° CCC - FMS No. / N° VME other methods of delivery. G410020002 N/A Time Zone REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Sollicitation Closes – L’invitation prend fin Fuseau horaire DEMANDE DE PROPOSITION at – à 02 :00 PM Eastern Standard on – le August 19, 2019 Time EST F.O.B. - F.A.B. Proposal To: Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: Canadian Transportation Agency Address Inquiries to : - Adresser toutes questions à: Email: We hereby offer to sell to Her Majesty the Queen in right [email protected] of Canada, in accordance with the terms and conditions set out herein, referred to herein or attached hereto, the Telephone No. –de téléphone : FAX No. – N° de FAX goods, services, and construction listed herein and on any Destination – of Goods, Services, and Construction: attached sheets at the price(s) set out thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • And U.S. Government Agency Regulation, Including the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S
    and U.S. government agency regulation, including the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. We endeavor to comply with such requirements at all times. We are also subject to state and local laws and regulations at locations where we operate and at airports that we serve. Our operations may become subject to additional international, U.S. federal, state and local requirements in the future. We believe that we are in material compliance with all currently applicable laws and regulations. Civil Reserve Air Fleet. As part of our Charter business, Atlas and Polar both participate in the U.S. Civil Reserve Air Fleet (“CRAF”) Program, which permits the U.S. Department of Defense to utilize participants’ aircraft during national emergencies when the need for military airlift exceeds the capability of military aircraft. Participation in the CRAF Program could adversely restrict our commercial business in times of national emergency. Under the CRAF Program, contracts with the AMC typically cover a one-year period. We have made a substantial number of our aircraft available for use by the U.S. military in support of their operations and we operate such flights pursuant to cost-based contracts. Atlas bears all direct operating costs for both passenger and cargo aircraft, which include fuel, insurance, overfly, landing and ground handling expenses. However, the price of fuel used during AMC flights is fixed by the U.S. military. The contracted charter rates (per mile) and fuel prices (per gallon) are fixed by the AMC periodically. We receive reimbursements from the AMC each month if the price of fuel paid by us to vendors for the AMC Charter flights exceeds the fixed price.
    [Show full text]
  • March 9, 2021 by ELECTRONIC MAIL
    National Air Carrier Association 1735 North Lynn Street, Suite 105 Arlington, VA 22209 T: +1.703.358.8060 March 9, 2021 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL The Honorable Steven M. Dickson Administrator Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Dear Administrator Dickson, Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Air Carrier Association (NACA) and its member carriers1 have worked closely with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) staff on various operational challenges. One of the more unique issues related to the pandemic has been an increase in disruptive passengers and crewmember assaults, often resulting from disputes associated with mask requirements. In mid-January, in the wake of the insurrection at the United States Capitol Building, the FAA instituted a Special Enforcement Emphasis Program (SEEP) designed to provide a “zero-tolerance”, maximum penalty, for passengers who have caused significant disruptions in-flight, or committed a physical assault against a member of a flight crew while onboard an aircraft. This program is scheduled to end on March 30, 2021. Many in the airline industry thought the SEEP would bring a significant reduction in disruptive passenger incidents. However, since the SEEP’s inception, our Ultra Low- Cost Carriers (ULCCs) 2 have seen little to no decline in the number of daily disruptive passenger incidents. Sufficient time has not been provided for the impact of the program to be known to the traveling public. Without an understanding of the significant penalties associated with the SEEP, passenger behavior has not been altered by the program’s implementation and the risk to the crew has not been mitigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Signatory Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Carriers
    Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Signatory Carriers As of May 1, 2019 Carriers that are highlighted in yellow hold expired Visa Waiver Program Agreements and therefore are no longer authorized to transport VWP eligible passengers to the United States pursuant to the Visa Waiver Program Agreement Paragraph 14. When encountered, please remind them of the need to re-apply. # 21st Century Fox America, Inc. (04/07/2015) 245 Pilot Services Company, Inc. (01/14/2015) 258131 Aviation LLC (09/18/2013) 26 North Aviation Inc. 4770RR, LLC (12/06/2016) 51 CL Corp. (06/23/2017) 51 LJ Corporation (02/01/2016) 620, Inc. 650534 Alberta, Inc. d/b/a Latitude Air Ambulance (01/09/2017) 711 CODY, Inc. (02/09/2018) A A OK Jets A&M Global Solutions, Inc. (09/03/2014) A.J. Walter Aviation, Inc. (01/17/2014) A.R. Aviation, Corp. (12/30/2015) Abbott Laboratories Inc. (09/26/2012) ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V. (d/b/a Interjet) (08/24/2011) Abelag Aviation NV d/b/a Luxaviation Belgium (02/27/2019) ABS Jets A.S. (05/07/2018) ACASS Canada Ltd. (02/27/2019) Accent Airways LLC (01/12/2015) Ace Aviation Services Corporation (08/24/2011) Ace Flight Center Inc. (07/30/2012) ACE Flight Operations a/k/a ACE Group (09/20/2015) Ace Flight Support ACG Air Cargo Germany GmbH (03/28/2011) ACG Logistics LLC (02/25/2019) ACL ACM Air Charter Luftfahrtgesellschaft GmbH (02/22/2018) ACM Aviation, Inc. (09/16/2011) ACP Jet Charter, Inc. (09/12/2013) Acromas Shipping Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Facility: MIA Units: Flight Operations Miami-Dade Aviation Department
    Miami-Dade Aviation Department Aviation Statistics Flight Ops - All Airlines Facility: MIA Units: Flight Operations Current Year:10/2020 -11/2020 Prior Year:10/2019 -11/2019 Domestic International % Domestic International Arrival Departure Arrival Departure Total Change Operator Total Arrival Departure Arrival Departure 4,143 4,125 2,825 2,848 13,941 -49.86% American Airlines Inc 27,805 7,957 8,395 5,943 5,510 1,708 1,709 424 425 4,266 -54.36% Envoy Air Inc 9,348 4,013 4,339 672 324 1,322 1,550 534 300 3,706 -16.76% Generic Cash and GA 4,452 1,719 2,038 525 170 Account 846 845 2 1 1,694 -41.42% Delta Air Lines Inc 2,892 1,337 1,335 109 111 363 372 447 439 1,621 7.49% United Parcel Service 1,508 314 314 442 438 5 3 752 757 1,517 195.71% LATAM Airlines Group SA 513 0 0 258 255 673 668 0 1 1,342 1.13% United Airlines, Inc 1,327 663 664 0 0 291 279 206 218 994 -3.12% Atlas Air Inc 1,026 325 275 195 231 195 193 296 297 981 65.43% Amerijet International 593 14 13 283 283 0 0 393 392 785 17.51% Tampa Cargo S.A. fka 668 0 0 333 335 Tampa Airlines 18 15 305 307 645 6.26% IBC Airways Inc 607 12 15 291 289 259 257 47 49 612 5.15% Federal Express 582 239 239 52 52 Corporation 7 6 266 265 544 7.30% Linea Aerea Carguera de 507 0 0 254 253 Colombia S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Customs Busters Cargo Tracking. • Please Airway Bill Prefix Number
    Customs Busters Cargo Tracking. • Please Airway Bill Prefix number e.g. 083 001 AA American Airlines 005 CO Continental Airlines 006 DL Delta Air Lines (more tracking) 013 GY Gabon Airlines 014 AC Air Canada 016 UA United Airlines Cargo ** (more tracking) 018 CP Canadian Airlines Int´l 020 LH Lufthansa Cargo AG 023 FX Fedex 027 AS Alaska Airlines (more tracking) 040 QC Camair-Co 042 RG VARIG 043 KA Dragonair 044 AR Aerolineas Argentinas (more tracking) 045 LA LAN Airlines (LATAM) 047 TP TAP Air Portugal 048 CY Cyprus Airways 050 OA Olympic Airways 053 EI Aer Lingus Cargo (more tracking) 055 AZ Alitalia (more tracking) 057 AF Air France (Skyteam tracking) 061 HM Air Seychelles 064 OK Czech Airlines (more tracking) 065 SV Saudi Arabian Airlines (more tracking) 070 RB Syrian Arab Airlines 071 ET Ethiopian Airlines 072 GF Gulf Air (more tracking) 074 KL KLM Cargo (Skyteam tracking) 075 IB Iberia (more tracking) 076 ME Middle East Airlines 077 MS Egyptair (more tracking) 079 PR Philippine Airlines 080 LO LOT Polish Airlines 081 QF Qantas Airways 082 SN Brussels Airlines 083 SA South African Airways 086 NZ Air New Zealand 096 IR Iran Air 098 AI Air India 105 AY Finnair 106 BW Caribbean Airlines (more tracking) 108 FI Icelandair (more tracking) 111 UP Bahamasair 112 CK China Cargo Airlines (more tracking) 114 LY EL AL 115 JU Air Serbia (JAT) 117 SK SAS-Scandinavian Airlines System 118 DT TAAG Angola Airlines 124 AH Air Algerie 125 BA British Airways 126 GA Garuda Indonesia 127 G3 Gol Airlines (VRG Linhas Aéreas) 128 UO Hongkong Express 129 MP
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Operating Budget 2020 Annual Operating Budget
    CITY OF SHREVEPORT BUDGET EXECUTIVE2020 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET 2020 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET Published by the City of Shreveport Adrian D. Perkins M A Y O R Sherricka Fields-Jones, Chief AdministrativeBUDGET Officer Kasey Brown, Assistant CAO/Budget Manager Printed by the City of Shreveport EXECUTIVE CITY OF SHREVEPORT 2020 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET CITY OF SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA 2020 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET Adrian D. Perkins MAYOR BUDGET Sherricka Fields-Jones CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Willie Bradford District A Levette Fuller District B John Nickelson District C Grayson Boucher District D EXECUTIVEJames Flurry District E James Green District F Jerry Bowman District G CITY OF SHREVEPORT 2020 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET BUDGET EXECUTIVE CITY OF SHREVEPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS THE MAYOR'S BUDGET MESSAGE 1 INFORMATION ABOUT SHREVEPORT Community Profile 10 Major Employers 15 BUDGET SUMMARIES Total Operating Budgets 19 Organization Chart of City Government 20 Form of Government and Services 21 Budgetary Structure 21 Statement of Budgetary Policies 23 Calendar for 2019 Budget Preparation 24 Budgetary Process 25 Full-Time Employees 26 Summary of Full-Time Positions by Budget Activity Unit 27 2019 Revenues by Source and Fund 31 2019 Expenditures by Source and FundBUDGET 32 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY Budgets by Department 34 Sources of Revenue and Uses of Funds 35 Budget Allocations by Department 36 General Fund Expenditures 36 Summary of Available Funds 37 Major Revenue Assumptions 38 Summary of Revenues 42 Revenue Detail 43 Summary
    [Show full text]
  • World Airliner Census 2015
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS EXPLANATORY NOTES This census data covers all commercial jet and parentheses in the right-hand column. excluded, unless a confirmed end-user is known – in turboprop-powered transport aircraft in service or on On the Ascend database, an airliner is defined as which case the aircraft is shown against the airline firm order with airlines worldwide, excluding aircraft being “in service” if it is “active” (in other words concerned. Operators’ fleets include leased aircraft. that carry fewer than 14 passengers or equivalent accumulating flying hours). An aircraft is classified as cargo. It records the fleets of Western, Chinese-built “parked” if it is known to be inactive – for example, if and Russia/CIS/Ukraine-built airliners. it is grounded because of airworthiness requirements The tables have been compiled by Flightglobal or in storage – and when flying hours for three Abbreviations Insight using Flightglobal’s Ascend Fleets database. consecutive months are reported as zero. Aircraft AR: advance range (Embraer 170/190/195) The information is correct up to July 2015 and undergoing maintenance or awaiting conversion are C: combi or convertible excludes non-airline operators, such as leasing also counted as being parked. ER: extended range companies and the military. Aircraft are listed in The region is dictated by operator base and does ERF: extended range freighter (747 and 767) alphabetical order, first by manufacturer and then type. not necessarily indicate the area of operation. F: freighter Operators are listed by region, with any aircraft variant Options and letters of intent (where a firm contract LR: long range in brackets next to the operator’s name.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Breakdown of Disability-Related Complaint Data: All Carriers
    Detailed Breakdown of Disability-Related Complaint Data: All Carriers Total number of complaints submitted: 11,518 Carrier Name Number of Complaints AER LINGUS LIMITED 0 AERO CALIFORNIA 1 AERODYNAMICS, INC. 0 AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES 0 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 0 AEROMEXICO 1 AEROPOSTAL ALAS DE VENEZUEL 3 AEROSVIT UKRANIAN AIRLINES 0 AIR ATLANTA EUROPE 16 AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC 0 AIR CANADA 248 AIR CANADA JAZZ 10 AIR CHINA 1 AIR COMET S.A. 0 AIR EUROPA LINEAS AEREAS 0 AIR FRANCE 30 AIR JAMAICA LIMITED 1 AIR JAPAN, CO 0 AIR LUXOR 0 AIR NEW ZEALAND 3 AIR PACIFIC, LTD. 0 AIR TAHITI NUI 1 AIR TRANSAT 17 AIR WISCONSIN 132 AIR-INDIA 4 AIRTRAN 87 ALASKA AIRLINES 215 ALITALIA-LINEE AEREE ITALIA 10 ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS CO. 0 ALLEGIANT 5 ALOHA AIRLINES 7 AMERICA WEST 536 AMERICAN AIRLINES 2061 AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES 171 ASIANA AIRLINES, INC. 3 ATA 94 ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES 191 AUSTRIAN AIRLINES 27 AVIACSA AIRLINES 3 AVIATION CONCEPTS 0 BAHAMASAIR HOLDING LIMITED 5 BOSTON-MAINE AIRWAYS 8 BRITANNIA AIRWAYS LTD. 147 BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC 165 BRITISH MIDLAND AIRWAYS LTD 16 BWIA WEST INDIES AIRWAYS 1 CASINO EXPRESS 1 CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD 8 CHAMPION AIR 7 CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES, INC 67 CHINA AIRLINES, LTD 3 CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES 0 COMAIR 301 COMPANIA MEXICANA DE AVIACI 1 COMPANIA PANAMENA (COPA) 3 CONDOR FLUGDIENST 0 CONTINENTAL 398 CONTINENTAL MICRONESIA 3 CZECH AIRLINES 2 DELTA AIR LINES 1326 EGYPTAIR 0 EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES LTD. 66 EMIRATES AIRLINE 4 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 0 EUROATLANTIC AIRWAYS TRANSPORTES AE 0 EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION 2 EXECUTIVE AIRLINES 11 FALCON AIR EXPRESS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Fly Quiet Program Chicago O’Hare International Airport
    4th Quarter 2018 Report Fly Quiet Program Chicago O’Hare International Airport Visit the O’Hare Noise Webpage on the Internet at www.flychicago.com/ORDNoise th 4 Quarter 2018 Report BACKGROUND On June 17, 1997, the City of Chicago announced that airlines operating at O’Hare International Airport had agreed to use designated noise abatement flight procedures in accordance with the Fly Quiet Program. The Fly Quiet Program was implemented in an effort to further reduce the impacts of aircraft noise on the surrounding neighborhoods. The Fly Quiet Program is a voluntary program that encourages pilots and air traffic controllers to use designated nighttime preferential runways and flight tracks developed by the Chicago Department of Aviation (CDA) in cooperation with the O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission, the airlines, and the air traffic controllers. These preferred routes direct aircraft over less-populated areas, such as forest preserves, highways, as well as commercial and industrial areas. As part of the Fly Quiet Program, the Chicago Department of Aviation prepares a Quarterly Fly Quiet Report. This report is shared with CDA staff, the O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission, the airlines, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the general public. The Fly Quiet Report contains detailed information regarding Fly Quiet Mode, runway use, flight operations, flight tracks, and noise complaints and 24-hour tracking of ground run-ups. The data presented in this report is compiled from the Airport Noise Management System (ANMS) and airport operation logs. FLY QUIET MODE (FQM) The FAA considers nighttime hours as 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.1 It is the CDA’s goal for the Fly Quiet Program to occur during the entire nine-hour nighttime period of 10:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]