DOCSLIB.ORG

Max Yellow Line

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INTERSTATE MAX YELLOW LINE L r a b om d SMITH AND BYBEE M WETLANDS NATURAL AREA arine Background Newberry PIER C COLUMBIA RIVER ol tland Expo Center PARK um b or The Interstate MAX Yellow Line is a 5.8-mile extension of MAX ia P light rail connecting Downtown Portland, the Rose Quarter, North PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL Marine RACEWAY Delta Park/ Portland neighborhoods, Portland International Raceway and the Fe ssenden Vanport Expo Center. The project was originally part of a longer extension, Portland hns International Airport t Jo the South-North light rail project, which would have stretched from S idge Kenton/ MLK town Br German N Denver Lombar the southern suburb of Milwaukie through Portland and across d N Lombard the Columbia River into Vancouver, Washington. Clark County, Transit Center Ai C r WILLAMETTE RIVER olum Washington, voters rejected financingp otheirr segment of that line bia Mt Hood Ave t in 1995. Three years later, the Portland region rejected a property Basin Rosa Parks Cascades Kaiser FOREST tax increase for a revised Oregon-only project, although it was PARK West Union N Killingsworth supported in Multnomah County and in the City of Portland. Laidlaw Killingsworth COLUMBIA RIVER Cornelius Pass Parkrose/Sumner d Transit Center Evergreen Support revives light rail for North Portland th Yeon Ai N Prescott 82n rpor Marine 85 S ky t 1 BLUE LAKE l i NE PORTLANDPortland business and neighborhood leaders asked TriMet and Thompson n St Helens San REGIONAL PARK e dy ncoe Evergreen Overlook Metro to find a way to build the “north” segment but address MLK BIG FOUR CORNERS Gle e t Park NATURAL AREA hu several issues. They wanted a less expensive project, no home or th S any 5 d 1 r 24th Albina/ d business displacements, and no increase in property taxes. The t Beth 223 Cornell Mississippi 33r Sandy J o 1s Sandy C Orenco/NW 231st Ave orne Broadway Interstate MAX light rail project met those criteria. rd ld ll a Interstate/ n H tfie NW PORTLAND NE 82nd FAIRVIEW is Hawthorn ornell Rose Quarter Halsey to Ha C Halsey 7th r Quatama/ Nearly 74 percent of the $350 million project cost was federally i GovernmentHillsboro Center Central/ Farm 25 GLENN c SE 3rd Transit Center Fair Complex/ NW 205th Ave OTTO C TROUTDALE o Ba Gateway/NE 99th t WOOD seline s Main Hillsboro Airport funded. This unusually high level of federal participation recognized l Rose Quarter u AUDUBON Transit Center 1 m SANCUTARIES NE 60th 8 VILLAGE / Transit Center Glisan 1 e b Oak 158th id d s tal T rn the region’s investment in the Airport MAX Red Line, which was i u a r o B E 102nd Ave Glisan E 122nd Ave o d ngton/ o R es E 148th Ave E 162nd Ave E 181st Ave u w th Ave n t i r an v 2th d ashi 2 W 1th constructed without federal funds. This brought the federal share k a ty Hospi al r e 1 Murray B 1 li W k Stark a r o e G Rockwood/E 188th Ave Willow Creek/ r SE 1 l H ua o HILLSBORO Sunset e T w r SW 185th Ave for Interstate MAX to $257.5 Wmillion.ashingt Metro regional transportation, E 172nd Ave Stark B Washington on SE 8th Ave Transit Center Stark y Transit Center Park H d Ruby Junction/E 197th Ave JACKSON BOTTOM awthorne MT TABOR SE Main Elmonica/ City of Portland andPARK TriMet funds made up the $92.5 million balance. Burnside WETLANDS Merlo Rd/ 82n PRESERVE th T SW 170th Ave SW 158th Ave d u 85 alati 2nd n V 1 PSU alley Hwy Je 2 nd nkins th 1 50th 62n Cornelius Pass 82 Beaverton 1 Civic Drive Division 48 s ane l 1 l 1 TUALATIN HILLS Creek i K H Design and construction highlights NATURE PARK Division r n a tto SE Division d Pa eBeaverton Cesar Chavez Gresham City Hall Cleveland Ave C Community-focused design Tua V Transit Center MAX Yellow Line light rail SE 17th Powell latin alley Millikan on H Cany MARQUAM & Rhine Po Gresham Central wy Way SW PORTLAND well serviceNATURE PconnectsARK the Expo A design priority was to transform SInterstateE Powell Avenue into a Transit Center Beaverton-Hill SE PORTLAND Beaverton sdale Hwy SE 17th & Holgate R Central pedestrian-friendly, multi-modal urban street. Interstate MAX o Center, N/NE Portland, SE Holgate b 209th e P 229th r o M t well Valley M s aca c serves long-established, diverse neighborhoods with a strong L POWELL BUTTE Hogan Portland City Center and o u NATURE PARK Lusted d BEAVERTON g am h sense of community. Station placement, design and art elements JENNE Allen l i Portland State University. n W oo Lents/SE Foster BUTTE reflect the adjacentdstock communities. The project also enhances the GRESHAM Orient on SE Bybee SPRINGWATER CORRIDOR y Most southbound trainsOAKS les a BOTTOM r B Farmington 170th O streetscape by tripling the number of trees along Interstate Avenue. r ry WILDLIFE Hall r REFUGE a nd e r Mu Multnom continue through Portland b ah Since the project is constructed at grade within the existing streeta r 282 ls F a ur SE Flavel b BUTTES W r hol e e aCityr Center as MAX Orange right-of-way, it integrates safety, lighting and aesthetics into NtheATURAL lc B h TOWLE n Sc SE Tacoma/ AREA g M BUTTE e d o Johnson Creek u WILLAMETTE R th Line trains to Milwaukie. alignmentJohnson design. Creek nt Scott Hall/Nimbus NATIONAL Taylors 82n 90 Brockman Washington Square CEMETARY 1 SPRINGWATER WILLAMETTE RIVER Mount Hood Capitol Taylors Ferry th Transit Center Ferry RIVER VIEW CORRIDOR NATURAL 90 AREA 1 EAST Barbur Blvd BLISS COOPER Transit Center SE Fuller nd BUTTE MOUNTAIN 32 NATURE PARK 1 145th King Barbur Idleman d 72n King 1 121st G Milwaukie/ MILWAUKIE th reen TRYON CREEK Main y nd b rr C h STATE 35 e u K a t e F 1 rg r r s NATURAL AREA r 5 e n e 222 7 v o d e Clackamas Town Center 1 o i r 129th B s /H r w Transit Center Tigard e y HAPPY v 2 W i 12 alnut Transit Center R Lake Harmony VALLEY lls Ferry Scho SE Park Sunnybrook TIGARD 82n S 9 MOUNT TALBERT unn DAMASCUS 7 ys Co d NATURE PARK ide K un Kellogg Creek th ru try Club Gaarde se Way Bull Mountain Johnson 2nd Lake Oswego 2 Bonita LAKE 1 Transit Center Thiessen OSWEGO W Clackamas-Boring e OSWEGO LAKE b s s Carman McLoughlin t r e Hall ey r ge d Oa C f Ben Durham l o e McV Be Sou Carver/Hwy 212 a th Sh tfi Roots c R ore th k e r Boones Ferry l a e oy d 35 m 1 R a Jennifer nd s / COOK isigg H nnings 232 PARK w Riv Je Am e y W r 2 2 HERITAGE PINE illamett 82nd 4 NATURAL AREA Tualatin rive D r e e Cl TUALATIN RIVER GLADSTONE v a i c fic Hwy 4th ka NATIONAL ci R 2 m Pa a WILDLIFE REFUGE 1 Tualatin s s/Hwy 224 a m TUALATIN MARY S. YOUNG a NORTH LOGAN k STATE c CLACKAMAS RIVER NATURAL AREA RECREATION AREA la d C oo akers Ferry BARTON rw Sagert B PARK he t in- S J r t Tuala o h n we WEST l s Langer o E n LINN egon RIVER ISLAND Or 65th Holcomb Sp B rin o gw r at l e a Salamo r n d Oregon City Transit Center d SHERWOOD or Boones Ferry ta Sunset S lls l l a i F Sc te H h t Redland ae Willame OREGON C d e a d r CITY s a c L a Mou McLoughlin Mo NEWELL d Ba s ntain CREEK e k l e e a CANYON c t ll le fi r e CANEMAH ap ci P WILLAMETTE RIVERBLUFF a M a L P d t el n in an o P l d a COFFEE LAKE WILSONVILLE tr South E n CREEK e WETLANDS C Bea v e WILLAMETTE rcr NARROWS ee FOREST k Wilsonville Rose Quarter junction In 2009, the MAX Yellow Line moved from the east- west downtown alignment that it had shared with the Red and Blue lines since 2004 to the new north- south alignment also used by the Green Line. At the east end of the Steel Bridge, Interstate MAX separates from this shared alignment and enters the median of the Yellow Line, which it follows for the next 4.5 miles, climbing a six percent grade between Albina and Overlook Park stations. Moving Paul Bunyan In the Kenton neighborhood, a 37-foot, six-ton statue of Paul Bunyan served as a community icon for more Brian Borrello’s Silicon Forest, at the Interstate/ than 40 years—and stood in the middle of the planned Rose Quarter MAX Station, presents a metaphor for alignment. A community event was held to move the displacement and change. statue 59.2 feet to a new plaza. Across from the statue, Creating art elements for stormwater management bright blue, hoof-shaped seating sculptures invoke • Paul’s legendary companion, Babe the Blue Ox. • Recycling asphalt and concrete as base materials for roadways, trackway and sidewalks Community art celebrates cultural diversity • Expanding wetlands and tripling the number of trees along the alignment Guided by an art advisory committee comprised of citizens and art professionals who live or work near • Reusing excavated soils in sewer trenches and the Interstate corridor, TriMet’s Public Art Program planters, saving on hauling and disposal captured the diverse cultural and historic character of • Recycling excavated old trolley rails the 10 station areas.
Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study

    Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study

    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
  • NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon

    NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon

    Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Publications and Presentations Planning 6-24-2014 Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Jenny H. Liu Portland State University, [email protected] Zakari Mumuni Portland State University Matt Berggren Portland State University Matt Miller University of Utah Arthur C. Nelson University of Utah SeeFollow next this page and for additional additional works authors at: https:/ /pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac Part of the Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Liu, Jenny H.; Mumuni, Zakari; Berggren, Matt; Miller, Matt; Nelson, Arthur C.; and Ewing, Reid, "Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon" (2014). Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations. 124. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson, and Reid Ewing This report is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Do TODs Make a Difference? Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson & Reid Ewing Portland State University 6/24/2014 ______________________________________________________________________________ DO TODs MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 of 35 Section 1-INTRODUCTION 2 of 35 ______________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1-INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................
  • Green Line Update Stage 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Green Line Is Important to the Future of Calgary and Benefits All Calgarians

    Green Line Update Stage 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Green Line Is Important to the Future of Calgary and Benefits All Calgarians

    Page 1 of 19 Item # 7.1 Green Line Report to ISC: UNRESTRICTED Green Line Committee GC2020-0583 2020 June 01 Green Line Update Stage 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Green Line is important to the future of Calgary and benefits all Calgarians. It represents a significant investment in our transportation network, in our communities, and the future of our city. In its entirety, Green Line will deliver high-quality transit service to Calgarians in north central and southeast communities, and strategically connect communities, employment hubs, and key destinations for Calgarians who live and work across the city. Green Line will not only provide more mobility choice for Calgarians and enhance future community building, moving forward with Green Line today will ready Calgary for tomorrow’s recovery. Green Line Stage 1 will be an important part of Calgary’s economic recovery. The Stage 1 investment will create an estimated 20,000 jobs and comes at a critical time when it is important to bolster Calgary’s economy. Green Line is also a long-term investment in the growth and development of our city, it will be part of Calgary’s global competitive advantage and will help attract new businesses and a young, talented workforce to our city. In July 2019, Administration advised Council of the need to re-evaluate the scope of Stage 1 to bring the Program’s cost estimates within budget, manage construction risk and improve the customer experience to best achieve the Green Line vision. Council directed Administration to undertake a review of the Stage 1 alignment and to complete a series of due diligence activities to confirm that Stage 1 has the right alignment, that Stage 1 is the right project for Calgary and that it will be delivered using the right approach.
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays

    Service Alerts – Digital Displays

    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
  • Each with Its Own Distinctive Personality and Style, PORTLAND's

    Each with Its Own Distinctive Personality and Style, PORTLAND's

    THE GET READY FOR YOUR 34 DOWNTOWN way to NEXT 35 OLD TOWN CHINATOWN 36 NORTHWEST PORTLAND 37 PEARL DISTRICT 38 CENTRAL EASTSIDE 39 HAWTHORNE/BELMONT . 40 DIVISION/CLINTON “10 Best in U.S.” 41 ALBERTA ARTS DISTRICT –Fodor’s Travel STREET42 MISSISSIPPI/WILLIAMS -TripAdvisor Each with its own SCENE distinctive personality and style, PORTLAND’S NEIGHBORHOODS add character to the city. ney St Pearl District NW Irving St NW Irving St ve ve A A A th oyt St th NW Hoyt St 6 6 ve ve A A Couch Park A W 1 W N St th NW Glisan St th NW Glisan 5 W 1 W N NW Flanders St ders St TRAVELPORTLAND.COM verett St NW Everett St COME VISIT US! ve e A l NW Davis St v P A Newberg, Oregon th 4 h KEEN Garage Portland t nity 0 i r 2 W 1 NW Couch St T 503.625.7385 N 505 NW 13th AVE NW NW vistaballoon.com NW W Burnside St Portland OR, 97209 405 SW ve PHOTOGRAPH BY AMYPHOTOGRAPH OUELLETTEBY ANKENY ALLEY IN OLD TOWN CHINATOWN A 33 JELD- h 3t 1 e Smith Lake Lake Force North Portland Harbor Smith Lake Columbia Slough Lake Force Columbia River Smith and Bybee Lakes Park North Portland Harbor N Swift Hwy Columbia Slough Delta Park Slough Columbia Slough Portland Intl Airport Columbia Slough Drainage Canal Drainage Canal Columbia Slough Columbia Slough Columbia Slough an Island Basin Sw Columbia Slough Columbia Slo ugh Columbia Columbia Slough Slough Beach Elem. School EAT PLAY The 1 Alder Street food cart pod (S.W.
  • Attachment 1

    Attachment 1

    CPC2021-0280 Attachment 1 Background and Planning Evaluation Background and Site Context The subject site is in the community of Montgomery, located mid-block along the south side of 21 Avenue NW between 45 Street NW and 46 Street NW. It is currently developed with a single detached dwelling and a rear detached garage with rear lane access. The site is approximately 0.06 hectares in size and approximately 15 metres wide by 36 metres long. The surrounding land uses are primarily R-C1 District and R-C2 District development with single and semi-detached homes. Community Peak Population Table As identified below, the community of Montgomery reached its peak population in 1969. Montgomery Peak Population Year 1969 Peak Population 5,287 2019 Current Population 4,515 Difference in Population (Number) -772 Difference in Population (Percent) -14.6% Source: The City of Calgary 2019 Civic Census Additional demographic and socio-economic information may be obtained online through the Montgomery Community Profile. CPC2021-0280 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 5 ISC:UNRESTRICTED CPC2021-0280 Attachment 1 Location Maps CPC2021-0280 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 5 ISC:UNRESTRICTED CPC2021-0280 Attachment 1 Previous Council Direction None. Planning Evaluation Land Use The existing R-C1 District is a low-density residential designation applied to developed areas that accommodates for single detached homes. The R-C1 District allows for a maximum building height of 10 metres and a maximum density of one dwelling unit. The proposed R-C2 District is a low-density residential designation that allows for a slightly wider range of low-density housing forms such as single detached, semi-detached, duplex dwellings, and secondary suites.
  • MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of Trimet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY

    MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of Trimet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY

    MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of TriMet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY 50 YEARS OF TRIMET AND TRANSIT IN THE PORTLAND REGION CONTENTS Foreword: 50 Years of Transit Creating Livable Communities . 1 Setting the Stage for Doing Things Differently . 2 Portland, Oregon’s Legacy of Transit . 4 Beginnings ............................................................................4 Twentieth Century .....................................................................6 Transit’s Decline. 8 Bucking National Trends in the Dynamic 1970s . 11 New Institutions for a New Vision .......................................................12 TriMet Is Born .........................................................................14 Shifting Gears .........................................................................17 The Freeway Revolt ....................................................................18 Sidebar: The TriMet and City of Portland Partnership .......................................19 TriMet Turbulence .....................................................................22 Setting a Course . 24 Capital Program ......................................................................25 Sidebar: TriMet Early Years and the Mount Hood Freeway ...................................29 The Banfield Project ...................................................................30 Sidebar: The Transportation Managers Advisory Committee ................................34 Sidebar: Return to Sender ..............................................................36
  • Transportation Funding Task Force: Trimet Update

    Transportation Funding Task Force: Trimet Update

    Transportation Funding Task Force: TriMet Update September 25th, 2019 Meeting Outline Welcome and Introduction Dr. Linda Simmons, TriMet Board Member and T2020 Task Force Member 1. Transit Equity and Inclusion, Low Income Fare Initiatives John Gardner - Director, Transit Equity, Inclusion and Community Affairs 2. Transit Service Update and Future Service Outlook Kerry Ayres-Palanuk – Director, Planning & Policy 3. Enhanced Transit and Better Bus Program Jamie Snook – Manager, Capital Planning 4. Regionally Significant Transit Priorities Dave Unsworth – Director, Project Development & Permitting Discussion with Task Force Members Bernie Bottomly - Executive Director, Public Affairs 2 1. Transit Equity and Inclusion, Low Income Fare Initiatives John Gardner Director of Transit Equity, Inclusion and Community Affairs TriMet’s Diversity at a glance TriMet’s Board • Majority women and men of color TriMet’s Executive Leadership • Majority women and men of color TriMet’s Staff reflects the Diversity of the Region TriMet’s Ridership • 37% of all trips on TriMet are taken by people of color • 40% of the trips taken by people of color are taken on MAX 4 Community Engagement • TEAC TriMet’s Transit Equity Advisory Committee is made up of the following organizations • Safety & Security • Youth Committee • Language Access Advisory Committee • Committee on Accessible Transportation • Riders Club ~59,500 • Launching newsletter for 170 community based organizations and system partners 5 Fare affordability & system access • Access Transit provides $1.3
  • MAX Orange, Yellow and Teal Shelters Exhibit Select on Paper on Paper Works from the City of Calgary’S Public Art Collection

    MAX Orange, Yellow and Teal Shelters Exhibit Select on Paper on Paper Works from the City of Calgary’S Public Art Collection

    EDMONTON TRAIL SAIT NORTH HILL FOOTHILLS MEDICAL CENTRE MO SUNRIDGE MALL Continued on Continued from ALBERTA CHILDREN’S next page previous page HOSPITAL GENESIS CENTRE CENTRE ST 4 ST NW H BRENTWOOD 7 SHOP 19 ST NE RUSSET RD RUNDLE 5 32 AVE NE SADDLETOWNE 44 AVE NE 9 EAT CIRCLE RUNDLESIDE DR 1 WHITEHORN DR 8 31 ST NW BRENTWOOD MARTINDALE FALSHIRE CASTLERIDGE BLVD DR BLVD 6 2 3 4 U OF C 1. SADDLETOWNE CIRCLE Mixed Bed Calgary City Hall West Young Wrestling Fans, Mallia Wild Rice, Lily Pads and 3. Katie Ohe and Diana Un-Jin Cho Artist: Cathrine Greene Artist: Ray Van Nes Calgary Artist: John Snow Summer Breezes Sun Trailing Date: 1987 Date: 1993 Artist: George Webber Date: 1972 Artist: Ted Godwin Artist: William Anderson Medium: Woodcut and Medium: Palladium print Date: 1978 Medium: Lithograph on paper Date: 1986 Date: 1989 intaglio on paper on paper Medium: Silver gelatin print Medium: Oil on canvas Medium: Silver gelatin print MAX Orange, Yellow and Teal shelters exhibit select on paper on paper works from the City of Calgary’s Public Art Collection. Summer Altar East Window, 7. 32 AVE NE Melody Artist: Cathrine Greene Grace Presbyterian Church Sam Livingston Artist: Barbara Milne Counter Untitled #7 Each work represents a unique perspective of an artist Date: 1989 Artist: Ray Van Nes Artist: Lisa Brawn Date: 1990 Artist: Helena Hadala, RCA Artist: Gregory Arnold Medium: Woodcut and Date: 1993 Date: 2009 Medium: Oil on canvas who has resided in Calgary at some point in their lives. Date: 1982 Date: 1967 intaglio on paper Medium: Palladium print Medium: Polychrome woodcut Works featured range in age from 80 years old to art Medium: Woodcut on paper Medium: Acrylic on board on paper created in this decade, and are created by many artists Flight of Fancy 9.
  • West Broadway Transit Study Economic Development Impacts of Transit Alternatives

    West Broadway Transit Study Economic Development Impacts of Transit Alternatives

    West Broadway Transit Study Economic Development Impacts of Transit Alternatives 11/11/2015 Prepared by the SRF Consulting Group Team for Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3 II. Baseline Development Scenario ............................................................................................................... 3 III. Literature Review & Case Study Findings ............................................................................................... 9 IV. Developer Interview Findings ................................................................................................................ 17 V. BRT and Streetcar Development Scenarios........................................................................................... 19 Appendix: Transit Economic Development Impacts Case Studies ............................................................. 24 West Broadway Transit Study 2 I. Introduction Metro Transit, in collaboration with Hennepin County and the Cities of Minneapolis, Robbinsdale, and Golden Valley, is seeking guidance on the economic development impacts of proposed streetcar and bus rapid transit (BRT) alternatives along the West Broadway corridor. As documented in the April 1, 2015 methodology statement, transit can support economic development by enhancing mobility and providing a placemaking amenity for the corridor. The Team developed a financial model in order to
  • TRANSPORTATION and GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2018 GRANT APPLICATION APPLICATIONS DUE 4:00 PM, June 8, 2018 Note: This Form Must

    TRANSPORTATION and GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2018 GRANT APPLICATION APPLICATIONS DUE 4:00 PM, June 8, 2018 Note: This Form Must

    TRANSPORTATION AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2018 GRANT APPLICATION APPLICATIONS DUE 4:00 PM, June 8, 2018 Note: This form must be filled out using the latest version of Adobe Acrobat or Reader. Download the latest version of Reader here: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ Download the Application, Application Packet, and Racial and Ethnic Impact Statement at: https://www.oregon.gov/LCD/TGM/Pages/Grants.aspx. Also on the web page are examples of successful TGM Applications, a list of all TGM grants to date, and help for developing a project approach and budget. Type of Grant: Category 1 ODOT Region (1-5): Region 1 Primary Applicant Jurisdiction: TriMet Project Title: TriMet Pedestrian Plan Mailing Address: 1800 SW 1st Ave., Suite 300 City/Zip: Portland 97201 Contact Person: Eve Nilenders Contact Person Title: Planner, Planning & Policy Telephone/Email: 503-962-2237 [email protected] MATCH YES NO Co-Applicants involved in the project: Summary Description of Project: This section must be completed. Do not refer to text within the application form. In no more than 1000 characters, describe the purpose of your project and the expected outcomes. The TriMet Pedestrian Plan will help jurisdictions identify top locations where infrastructure investments will improve pedestrian access to transit. Furthering the work started in the 2011 TriMet Pedestrian Network Analysis, the Pedestrian Plan will entail a robust public engagement process, the establishment of an advisory committee, and close coordination with stakeholders. The plan will include a pedestrian network connectivity analysis, an evaluation framework for pedestrian investments, and an updated hierarchy for investments in pedestrian access- to-transit infrastructure.
  • Streetcar System Concept Plan a Framework for Future Corridor Planning and Alternatives Analysis

    Streetcar System Concept Plan a Framework for Future Corridor Planning and Alternatives Analysis

    PORTLAND STREETCAR SYSTEM CONCEPT PLAN A Framework for Future Corridor Planning and Alternatives Analysis Adopted September 9, 2009 by Portland City Council This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration How this document will be used This document will be used to identify and select corridors for future Alternatives Analysis and planning studies as funding becomes available. No funding plan or schedule has been identified for any of the potential streetcar projects. Transit corridors citywide were assessed to determine which corridors have the best potential for future streetcar investment. Corridors that are shown in this document represent the best opportunities for streetcar infrastructure. Detailed corridor by corridor analysis, study and discussions with corridor neighborhoods are necessary to determine if a streetcar investment is warranted. No individual corridor can move forward without a detailed analysis and planning study to address the purpose and need of a streetcar project and to comprehensively evaluate project impacts. The Portland Bureau of Transportation fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the ADA Title II, and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. For accommodations and additional information, contact the Title II and Title VI Coordinator at Room 1204, 1120 SW 5th Ave, Portland, OR 97204, or by telephone 503-823-2559, City TTY 503-823-6868, or use Oregon Relay Service: 711. PORTLAND STREETCAR SYSTEM CONCEPT PLAN A Framework for Future Corridor Planning and Alternatives Analysis Adopted by Portland City Council September 9, 2009 Resolution 36732 Acknowledgements City of Portland Bureau of Transportation Sam Adams, Mayor, Commissioner of Public Utilities Susan D.