DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Railroad Administration Office Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Railroad Administration Office Of FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF RAILROAD SAFETY VOLUME I - SIGNAL AND TRAIN CONTROL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS AND POLICIES April 2012 VOLUME I - TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – General ............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Program Goals ............................................................................................................................................ 2 On-the-Job Training (OJT) Program .......................................................................................................... 2 S&TC Division Staff Director, HQ Staff Specialists, and HQ Staff Electronic Engineers ....................... 3 S&TC Division PTC Branch Supervisory Specialist (Branch Chief), PTC Senior Test Monitors, and PTC Regional Specialists ........................................................................................................................... 5 S&TC Regional Supervisory Specialist ..................................................................................................... 6 S&TC Railroad Safety Inspector ............................................................................................................... 8 Basis for Regulation and Inspection ........................................................................................................ 11 Signal and Train Control Regulations, Laws, and Orders ....................................................................... 12 Correct Reference to the Federal Regulations ......................................................................................... 13 Title 49 CFR Part 233 – Signal Systems Reporting Requirements – Overview ...................................... 14 Title 49 CFR Part 234 – Grade Crossing Signal System Safety and State Action Plans – Overview ..... 14 Title 49 CFR Part 235 – Instructions Governing Applications for Approval of a Discontinuance or Material Modification of a Signal System or Relief from the Requirements of Part 236 – Overview .... 15 Title 49 CFR Part 236 – Rules, Standards, and Instructions Governing the Installation, Inspection, Maintenance, and Repair of Signal and Train Control Systems, Devices, and Appliances – Overview . 16 Hours of Service Law Governing Railroad Signal Employees - Overview ............................................ 16 Personal Safety ......................................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 2 – Inspection and Investigation Procedures .................................................... 18 Inventory of Inspection Territory (Regional Inspection Points) .............................................................. 18 Inspection Priorities ................................................................................................................................. 18 Discipline Inspection Guidance (DIG) .................................................................................................... 18 Using Data Analysis to Determine Appropriate Focus ............................................................................ 18 Preparation for Inspection or Investigation .............................................................................................. 24 Notice of Inspection or Investigation ....................................................................................................... 24 Time of Inspections and Investigations ................................................................................................... 25 Conference Prior to Inspection or Investigation ...................................................................................... 25 Followup Inspection or Re-inspection ..................................................................................................... 26 Refusal to Permit an Inspection or Investigation ..................................................................................... 26 Waiver of Responsibility ......................................................................................................................... 27 Unusual Problems or Incidents ................................................................................................................ 27 Cooperation of Personnel with Industry and other Governmental Agencies ........................................... 27 Chapter 3 – Gaining Compliance ..................................................................................... 28 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 Regular Inspections .................................................................................................................................. 28 Conducting an Inspection or Investigation .............................................................................................. 29 Conference During and After an Inspection or Investigation .................................................................. 30 Special Inspections and/or Assessments .................................................................................................. 31 Special Investigations .............................................................................................................................. 33 Accident Investigation ............................................................................................................................. 33 Complaint Investigation ........................................................................................................................... 33 Block Signal or Waiver Application Investigation .................................................................................. 35 i False Proceed Signal Investigation .......................................................................................................... 35 Activation Failure Investigation ............................................................................................................... 37 Conducting Interviews ............................................................................................................................. 40 Determining When and What Enforcement Action Is Necessary ............................................................ 40 Handling of Defective Conditions ........................................................................................................... 42 Defective Conditions Not Cited as a Violation ........................................................................................ 42 Defective Conditions Cited as a Violation ............................................................................................... 42 Railroad Action to Correct Defective Conditions .................................................................................... 47 Written Reporting of Remedial Actions Taken ....................................................................................... 48 Chapter 4 – Field Reports, Procedures, and Forms ....................................................... 49 General Requirements .............................................................................................................................. 49 S&TC Inspections and Unit Count Guidelines ........................................................................................ 49 Completion of Inspection Report Form, FRA F6180.96 ......................................................................... 50 Distribution of Inspection Reports ........................................................................................................... 51 Regional Supervisory Specialist Review of Inspection Reports .............................................................. 51 Completion of Violation Report Form ..................................................................................................... 51 Distribution of Violation Reports ............................................................................................................ 52 Regional Supervisory Specialist Review of Violation Reports ............................................................... 53 Block Signal or Waiver Application Investigation Reports ..................................................................... 53 Regional Supervisory Specialist Review of Block Signal or Waiver Application Investigation Reports .................................................................................................................................................................. 53 False Proceed Signal Failure Investigation Reports ................................................................................ 54 Regional Supervisory Specialist Review of False Proceed Signal Failure Investigation Reports ........... 55 Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Activation Failure Investigation Reports ............................................... 55 Regional Supervisory Specialist Review of Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Activation Failure Investigation Reports ............................................................................................................................... 55 National Safety Program Plan (NSPP) Status Reports ...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • [(Central] [Central, 6 E -1 4
    /NEWYORK^ Fnewyork^ [(Central] [Central, 6 e -1 4 Reference Marks NEW YORK CENTRAL LC.L Between POPULAR ALL-COACH DAYLINER Dally. II Meal station. Sunday only. • Thla train does not carry baggage SERVICE ADVANTAGES Chicago, Pittsburgh & Boston Daily except Sunday- Ex. Sun.—Runs dally except Sunday. Daily except Monday. E.T.—Eastern Standard Time. Daily except Saturday. C.T.—Central Standard Time. In addition to the train service shown, buses of the United Traction Company run at frequent intervals between Albany and Troy. | I i^i ichedulot . pcart'd to 5 Packing and handling research Stops on signal to receive passengers for stations beyond Albuny. traffic requirement! for most ... they assure the security ol Stops to receive or discbarge passengers for or from Astatabula and beyond. Stops except Saturdays and Sundays. rX|M*llitioilH .1. Ii\ i-r n--. the shipped merchandise. bb Stops at 6.25 a. m. to discharge passengers from Rochester and beyond or to 2 Free pick up and delivery ser• receive passengers for Chicago. Smooth operation . easy 4 Stops on signal to receive passengers for beyond Troy. vice . direct from Hliippcr's grades... superlative roadbed. Stops on signal to discharge or receive passengers. to roiisipiirrV door. No baggage handled for or from this station; *y Constant supervision and pro• Stops regularly, but only to receive passengers. * f Optional trucking allowance to tection in transit.. still mon Stops only to discbarge passengers. nhi|»|MTH jiiul roiittignrcR ... a security for shipped merchan Runs Saturdays only. mi I • i i ii i ii I tavina to both. dise.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration, DOT § 235.7
    Federal Railroad Administration, DOT § 235.7 railroads that operate on standard gage (5) Removal of an intermittent auto- track which is part of the general rail- matic train stop system in conjunction road system of transportation. with the implementation of a positive (b) This part does not apply to rail train control system approved by FRA rapid transit operations conducted over under subpart I of part 236 of this chap- track that is used exclusively for that ter. purpose and that is not part of the gen- (b) When the resultant arrangement eral system of railroad transportation. will comply with part 236 of this title, it is not necessary to file for approval § 235.5 Changes requiring filing of ap- to decrease the limits of a system as plication. follows: (a) Except as provided in § 235.7, ap- (1) Decrease of the limits of an inter- plications shall be filed to cover the locking when interlocked switches, de- following: rails, or movable-point frogs are not in- (1) The discontinuance of a block sig- volved; nal system, interlocking, traffic con- (2) Removal of electric or mechanical trol system, automatic train stop, lock, or signal used in lieu thereof, train control, or cab signal system or from hand-operated switch in auto- other similar appliance or device; matic block signal or traffic control (2) The decrease of the limits of a territory where train speed over the block signal system, interlocking, traf- switch does not exceed 20 miles per fic control system, automatic train hour; or stop, train control, or cab signal sys- (3) Removal of electric or mechanical tem; or lock, or signal used in lieu thereof, (3) The modification of a block signal from hand-operated switch in auto- system, interlocking, traffic control matic block signal or traffic control system, automatic train stop, train territory where trains are not per- control, or cab signal system.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Standards for New Technology Signal Systems for Rail Transit Applications
    Transactions on the Built Environment vol 34, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 Developing standards for new technology signal systems for rail transit applications A. F. Rumsey Parsons Transportation, New York, U.S.A. Abstract Radio communications-based train control (CBTC) systems, also referred to as transmission-based signalling (TBS) systems, permit more effective utilization of rail transit infrastructure by allowing trains to operate safety at much closer headways, by permitting greater flexibility and greater precision in train control, and by providing continuous safe train separation assurance and overspeed protection. One of the challenges facing transit agencies who are considering the introduction of CBTC systems, however, is the lack of industry standards for this emerging technology, and the current inability of trains equipped with CBTC equipment from one supplier to operate on track equipped with CBTC equipment from a second supplier. This paper reports on the status of two separate initiatives being taken in North America to develop standards for CBTC systems for rail transit applications; one based on a voluntary consensus development approach, and the second based on a competitive procurement approach. 1 Background Conventional signalling and train control systems rely almost exclusively on track circuits to detect the presence of trains. Information on the status of the track ahead is provided to train operators either through wayside signals or trainborne cab signals. Ensuring compliance with the signals is achieved either through strict observance of operating procedures, or through automatic train protection features such as wayside electro-mechanical train stops, or trainborne supervisory equipment linked to the train's braking system.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Cost Highway-Rail Intersection Active Warning System Field
    Low•Cost Highway•Rail Intersection Active Warning System Field Operational Test Evaluation Report Prepared for: December 2005 Low•Cost Highway•Rail Intersection Active Warning System Field Operational Test Evaluation Report Prepared for: Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Traffic, Security and Operations Prepared by: URS Corporation and TranSmart Technologies, Inc. December 2005 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... v 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 ROJECTP PURPOSE............................................................................................................ 2 1.2 ARTICIPANTSP .................................................................................................................. 3 2. PROJECT BACKGROUND................................................................................................ 4 2.1 YSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, TESTING, AND FIELD OPERATIONAL TEST................................ 4 2.2 HUMAN FACTORS EVALUATION....................................................................................... 6 3. REVIEW OF EMERGING HRI TECHNOLOGY ........................................................... 7 3.1 OVERVIEW OF ACTIVE WARNING TECHNOLOGY ............................................................. 7 3.2 MERGINGE HRI TECHNOLOGY........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Safety at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings
    NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT FACTORS INFLUENCING SAFETY AT HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS NAS-NAE OCT 24 1968 LIBf^ARY HIGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES-NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING HIGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD 1968 Officen DAVID H. STEVENS, Chairman OSCAR T. MARZKE, First Vice Chairman D. GRANT MICKLE, Second Vice Chairman W. N. CAREY, JR., Executive Director Executive Committee ' LOWELL K. BRIDWELL, Federal Highway Administrator, V. S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) A. E. JOHNSON, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway Officials (ex officio) GEORGE C. SPONSLER, Executive Secretary, Division of Engineering, National Research Council (ex officio) , J. B. McMORRAN, Commissioner, New York Department of Transportation (ex officio. Past Chairman 1966) EDWARD G. WETZEL, Associate Consultant, Edwards and Kelcey (ex officio, Past Chairman 1967) DONALD S. BERRY, Chairman, Department of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University J. DOUGLAS CARROLL, JR., Executive Director, Tri-State Transportation Commission, New York City * WILLIAM L. GARRISON, Director, Center for Urban Studies, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago SIDNEY GOLDIN, Vice President of Marketing, Asiatic Petroleum Corp. WILLIAM J. HEDLEY, Consultant ^ GEORGE E. HOLBROOK, Vice President, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 1 EUGENE M. JOHNSON, Chief Engineer, Mississippi State Highway Department PYKE JOHNSON, Retired THOMAS F. JONES, JR., President, University of South Carolina •• LOUIS C. LUNDSTROM, Director, Automotive Safety Engineering, General Motors Technical Center OSCAR T. MARZKE, Vice President, Fundamental Research, U. S. Steel Corporation * D. GRANT MICKLE, Vice President, Automotive Safety Foundation LEE LA VERNE MORGAN, Executive Vice President, Caterpillar Tractor Company T. E. SHELBURNE, Slate Highway Research Engineer, Virginia Highway Research Council CHARLES E.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Violations at Gated Highway-Railroad Grade Crossings
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Re No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1 i TX 987-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS AT GATED HIGHWAY-RAILROAD October 1997 GRADE CROSSINGS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kay Fitzpatrick, Paul J. Carlson, Jonathan A. Bean, and Richard T. Research Report 2987-1 Bartoskewitz 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Study No. 7-2987 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research: Research and Technology Transfer Office September 1995 - August 1997 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation. Research Study Title: Evaluation of Automated Highway-Railroad Grade Crossing Enforcement System 16 . Abstract Senate Bill 1512, which was passed into law by the 74th State Legislature in 1995, required the Texas Department of Transportation to install and operate automated highway-railroad grade crossing enforcement systems as a demonstration project. Three sites with gate arms, relatively high traffic and train volumes, and a minimum number of accidents, were selected for the demonstration study. Additionally, a violation study was conducted at 16 additional gated crossings. The purpose of the violation study was to identifY roadway geometric and operational characteristics that influence violations at gated highway-railroad grade crossings. The demonstration project resulted in no statistical differences between the violations during the before period compared to the after period.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Transportation Systems at Highway-Rail Intersections a Cross-Cutting Study
    Intelligent Transportation Systems at Highway-Rail Intersections A Cross-Cutting Study Improving Safety and Mobility at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings December 2001 Intelligent Transportation Systems at Highway-Rail Intersections: A Cross-Cutting Study i Executive Summary In 1997, the ITS Joint Program Office (JPO) at the Federal Highway Administration commissioned a study to identify projects being conducted in the U.S. that used Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) at highway-rail grade crossings, including not only those projects that were Federally-sponsored, but state and locally-sponsored ones, as well. The study identified seven projects that tested five functions: in-vehicle warning, second train warning, use of crossing blockage information for traveler information and traffic management, four quadrant gates with automatic train stop, and a comprehensive set of technologies called the Intelligent Grade Crossing. The following year, the JPO commissioned a cross-cutting study to examine the commonalities and differences among the seven projects. This report documents the findings of that cross-cutting study: · Several railroads were reluctant to fully participate in the projects due to liability, safety and operational concerns. Although there were exceptions, passenger railroads – and, in particular, light rail transit – tended to be more involved in these projects than freight railroads. · In all but one of the seven projects examined in this study, the largest share of funding came from the Federal level, through either direct Federal grants or Congressional designations. In the one project that was the exception to this rule, the largest share of funding came from a private sector technology vendor who made in-kind contributions, using the opportunity of the test to refine its prototype system.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open TM Database Composite.Pdf
    • • • • TRANSPORTATION-MARKINGS • DATABASE • COMPOSITE CATEGORIES • CLASSIFICATION & INDEX • • • -­ • III III • 1 TRANSPORTATION-MARKINGS: A STUDY IN CO.MMUNICATION MONOGRAPH SERIES Alternate Series Title: An Inter-modal Study of Safety Aids Transportatiol1-Markings Database Alternate T-M Titles: Transport [ation] Mark [ing]s / Transport Marks / Waymarks T-MFoundations, 4th edition, 2005 (Part A, Volume I, First Studies in T-M) (3rd edition, 1999; 2nd edition, 1991) Composite Categories A First Study in T-M: The US, 2nd edition, 1993 (Part B, Vol I) Classification & Index International Marine Aids to Navigation, 2nd edition, 1988 (parts C & D, Vol I) [Unified First Edition ofParts A-D, University Press ofAmerica, 1981] International Traffic Control Devices, 2nd edition, 2004 (Part E, Volume II, Further Studies in T-M) (lst edition, 1984) Part Iv Volume III, Additional Studies, International Railway Signals, 1991 (Part F, Vol II) International Aero Navigation Aids, 1994 (Part G, Vol II) Transportation-Markil1gs: A Study il1 T-M General Classification with Index, 2nd edition, 2004 (Part H, Vol II) (1st edition, 1994) Commllnication Monograph Series Transportation-Markings Database: Marine Aids to Navigation, 1st edition, 1997 (I'art Ii, Volume III, Additional Studies in T-M) TCDs, 1st edition, 1998 (Part Iii, Vol III) Railway Signals. 1st edition, 2000 (part Iiii, Vol III) Aero Nav Aids, 1st edition, 2001 (Part Iiv, Vol III) Composite Categories Classification & Index, 1st edition, 2006 (part Iv, Vol III) (2nd edition ofDatabase, Parts Ii-v,
    [Show full text]
  • UPRR - General Code of Operating Rules
    Union Pacific Rules UPRR - General Code of Operating Rules Seventh Edition Effective April 1, 2020 Includes Updates as of September 28, 2021 PB-20280 1.0: GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES 2.0: RAILROAD RADIO AND COMMUNICATION RULES 3.0: Section Reserved 4.0: TIMETABLES 5.0: SIGNALS AND THEIR USE 6.0: MOVEMENT OF TRAINS AND ENGINES 7.0: SWITCHING 8.0: SWITCHES 9.0: BLOCK SYSTEM RULES 10.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN CENTRALIZED TRAFFIC CONTROL (CTC) 11.0: RULES APPLICABLE IN ACS, ATC AND ATS TERRITORIES 12.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN AUTOMATIC TRAIN STOP SYSTEM (ATS) TERRITORY 13.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN AUTOMATIC CAB SIGNAL SYSTEM (ACS) TERRITORY 14.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY WITHIN TRACK WARRANT CONTROL (TWC) LIMITS 15.0: TRACK BULLETIN RULES 16.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN DIRECT TRAFFIC CONTROL (DTC) LIMITS 17.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN AUTOMATIC TRAIN CONTROL (ATC) TERRITORY 18.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL (PTC) TERRITORY GLOSSARY: Glossary For business purposes only. Unauthorized access, use, distribution, or modification of Union Pacific computer systems or their content is prohibited by law. Union Pacific Rules UPRR - General Code of Operating Rules 1.0: GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1: Safety 1.1.1: Maintaining a Safe Course 1.1.2: Alert and Attentive 1.1.3: Accidents, Injuries, and Defects 1.1.4: Condition of Equipment and Tools 1.2: Personal Injuries and Accidents 1.2.1: Care for Injured 1.2.2: Witnesses 1.2.3: Equipment Inspection 1.2.4: Mechanical Inspection 1.2.5: Reporting 1.2.6: Statements 1.2.7: Furnishing Information
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Integrated Automatic Train Stop with Patterns (ATS-P) On-Board System
    Computers in Railways VII, C.A. Brebbia J.Allan, R.J. Hill, G. Sciutto & S. Sone (Editors) © 2000 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISBN 1-85312-826-0 Development of integrated automatic train stop with patterns (ATS-P) on-board system M. Miyachi', H. Ikeda*, H. Tokuhashi* ' Safety Research Laboratory, * Hachioji Branch office East Japan Railway Company, Japan * Kyosan Electric MFG. Company, Japan Abstract The East Japan Railway Company (JR-East) has been introducing aggressively the ATS-P system, which has a high safety record in train operations in preventing serious train accidents since 1989. As the existing ATS-P on-board system has been used for 10 years, a number of problems for the on-board system are recently increasing. Investigation into the causes of these problems are difficult with to the existing system, which has not got appropriate recording devices. In order to improve the cost-effectiveness, the reliability and the maintenance of the system, the ATS-P on-board system should be completely re-designed. The authors have developed the integrated ATS-P on-board system. As a result, the system has the benefit of both the reduction in costs and the improvement in the reliability and also a reduction in the number of devices constituting the on-board system. The existing ATS-P on-board system is composed of several devices, but the integrated ATS-P on-board system is composed of only one main device, a smaller relay block and so on. This system shows results with about 70% of the cost and almost 133% of the reliability of the existing newest on-board system.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Fe's Steel Radial Roof Cabooses
    SFRH&MS 2010 CONVENTION, DENVER Santa Fe’s Steel Radial Roof Cabooses Jim Price photo 1948 John McCall collection Santa Fe 2-6-2 1120 San Angelo – Sterling City mixed 2 SFRH&MS 2010 CONVENTION, DENVER Santa Fe’s Steel Radial Roof Cabooses Period covered 1927 to 1976 Timeline vs. Details By John B. Moore, Jr. Albuquerque 3 Contributors • Frank Ellington • John McCall • Stephen Priest • Craig Ordner • Gordon Locke • John Signor • Charlie Slater • Steve Rippeteau • Steve Sandifer • Eddie Corbin • Greg Silva • John Hitzeman • Keith Jordan • Paul Brown • Jay Miller • Andy Sperandeo • Bill Childers • Ron Welch • J. P. Hereford, Jr. • Richard Biermann • Stan Kistler • Gordon Bassett • Mark Wilkouski • Joe McMillan • Frank Angstead • 4 SFRH&MS 2010 CONVENTION, DENVER overview • Detail changes over time – Improvements – Changing needs – Safety • Presentation is divided into eras – 1930s ACF built cabooses – 1940s ATSFbuilt cabooses – 1950s Radios – 1960s Changes – 1970s final years of the 4 digit numbers 5 SFRH&MS 2010 CONVENTION, DENVER Radial roof cabooses 1500-1649 AC&F 1927 150 cars 1650-1749 AC&F 1928 100 cars 1750-1874 AC&F 1929 125 cars 1875-1978 AC&F 1930 104 cars 1979-2000 AC&F 1931 22 cars TOTAL 501 cars 2001-2008 ATSF 1942 8 cars 2009-2100 ATSF 1943 92 cars 2101-2200 ATSF 1944 100 cars TOTAL 200 cars Peaked roof cabooses 2201-2300 ATSF 1949 100 cars (Duryea underframe) 500-599 ATSF 1949 100 cars TOTAL 200 cars 6 Roof walk (Running Board) configurations – built with wood W - built with steel S Note some wood running boards replaced with
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Pacific V. Limmer
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 06-0023 444444444444 MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY D/B/A UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. PATRICIA LIMMER, BILLYE JOYCE SMITH, AND BOBBY JEAN NOTHNAGEL, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 Argued November 13, 2007 JUSTICE HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFERSON, JUSTICE WAINWRIGHT, JUSTICE MEDINA, JUSTICE GREEN, JUSTICE JOHNSON, and JUSTICE WILLETT joined. JUSTICE O’NEILL and JUSTICE GUZMAN did not participate in the decision. In this wrongful death action arising out of a truck-train collision, the plaintiffs claim that crossbucks — the familiar black-and-white, X-shaped signs that read “RAILROAD CROSSING”1 — provided inadequate warning for the railroad crossing and that the railroad was negligent in failing to remove a gravel pile and vegetation that restricted drivers’ view of approaching trains. The railroad contends that federal law preempts these claims. When railroad crossing improvements are 1 U.S. DEP’T OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, at Table 2A-4 (2003) (Use of Sign Shapes), available at http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/2003r1r2/ mutcd2003r1r2complet.pdf [hereinafter MANUAL]. federally funded, federal regulations specify what warning devices must be used,2 and the United States Supreme Court has held that section 20106 of the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 19703 expressly preempts state tort law actions challenging the adequacy of those devices.4 The trial court concluded that federal regulations do not apply in this case, and the court of appeals affirmed.5 We disagree and accordingly reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and render judgment that the plaintiffs take nothing.
    [Show full text]