DOCSLIB.ORG

In Conversation with Hans Hollein

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Hans Ulrich Obrist: You’ve frequently worked at the junctures between art and architecture. Could you tell us about your early work in exhibition design as well as exhibitions of your own art?Ê ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHans Hollein: My earliest endeavors in that direction date to 1956, when I’d completed my 01/10 architecture studies at the Academy of Fine Arts in Vienna. I hadn’t received any commissions, but I started to develop ideas. My first studies for a purposeless or – my term at the time – absolute architecture were located on the boundary between architecture and visual art or, more specifically, between architecture and sculpture. I never believed in a neat division between Hans Ulrich Obrist architecture and the other visual arts. I fleshed out my ideas in drawings and models and then won a fellowship to go to the US for two years. I In Conversation used the time to study at the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago and get a master’s degree with Hans at Berkeley.Ê ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHUO: Who were your teachers in Chicago? Hollein ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHH: I started studying with Mies van der Rohe, but soon after I got there he withdrew from the IIT due to internal differences, although I continued to see him privately. I then took urban planning classes with Hilberseimer and Peterhans. In my second year, I moved to California. But the real main purpose of my stay was to work free of constraints and really get to know America. I logged around sixty thousand miles driving around the country, with a wide variety of intentions and research foci. For t s i example, at one point I went on a trip to visit r b O every Vienna in the US. I also looked at every h c single building by Frank Lloyd Wright. That was i r l U when I was first confronted with the reality of his s n designs. I’d known his architecture only from a H Ê photographs, so the three-dimensional reality 5 1 was very imposing. I looked at everything he’d 0 2 r done, down to the pigpens he’d built in Alabama. e n b i Shortly before his death, he invited me to come o e t l l c o up to Taliesin in Wisconsin for a weekend. o H — s Another subject I was interested in very early on 6 n 6 a was Native American architecture. I went to the # H h — t Southwest several times to study the pueblos i 6 w 6 more closely.Ê n # o l i ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHUO: Did you document your research?Ê t a a n r s r ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHH: I accumulated around two thousand u e o j v slides, a pretty extensive collection. The n x o u l C f University of California wanted to buy it, but I - n e I declined their offer. Unfortunately, almost all the slides were stolen from my car three days before I flew back home. All I was left with was a series of pictures of Schindler’s buildings I’d deposited at the Museum of Modern Art. I’d seen a photograph of Schindler’s Beach House in an old issue of Architectural Record, which made a big impression on me. I asked around, but no one in my acquaintance knew anything about the 09.18.15 / 19:53:24 EDT architecture. So I drove to Los Angeles to see over my own creative activities. In today’s more of his buildings and take photographs. I parlance, what I was doing at the time, especially met his widow and his former lover, who in my environments, would be described as introduced me to his circle of friends. Schindler crossover. Take, for example, my early drawings himself had died in 1953. I brought out the first and collages from the late 1950s and early ’60s, books about Schindler in 1960 and 1961. I also which were acquired by the Museum of Modern obtained access to his archive, which was stored Art. In Berkeley, I did a master’s thesis on “Space in his son’s garden house. All his drawings were 02/10 in Space in Space,” a subject I examined in texts, there, in big stacks, with the models sitting atop drawings, and models of various sizes. After them, and I was able to document some of that in coming back from the US, I gave a lecture on my photographs as well. I took the material to the works and ideas. To my mind, I was a sculptor Museum of Modern Art in New York, gave them much more than an architect. In 1963 I presented an introduction to Schindler’s work, and my work in a joint exhibition with Walter Pichler suggested that they should preserve his archive. at Galerie nchst St. Stephan.Ê They replied that Schindler wasn’t important. ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHUO: Was that your first exhibition? Then, in 1964, I also published an article on the ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHH: No. In 1959, I’d done a modest show of pueblo in which I discussed the basic principles work related to my thesis and other pieces I’d and the complexity of this architecture and its created during my time in the US. And I’d put interaction with the landscape and nature. together a small exhibition on Schindler at the ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHUO: These were the beginnings of your Museum of Applied Arts (MAK) in Vienna in 1960. work as a documentarian? But the show at Galerie nchst St. Stephan in ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHH: Yes, but I never planned on becoming 1963, which was on display for all of three days, an architecture historian or critic. I called my was the first presentation of my art. It elicited a publications on Schindler a “contribution to a very intense reaction. People rushed into the corrected architectural history.” Same with my gallery determined to destroy the models. The work on the Viennese architect Josef Hoffmann: Kronen Zeitung, an influential tabloid, launched a When I was a student, in 1954–56, art historians massive attack as well. Although the exhibition had lost sight of his significance. You could pick closed after a few days, it triggered a up furniture designed by Hoffmann at estate fundamental shift in the situation in Vienna at sales and from dumpsters. Drawings by Klimt the time. It was also documented in a little and Schiele went for ten dollars apiece. I thought catalogue. The Museum of Modern Art got in it was my duty to restore these pioneers of touch and purchased some of the exhibits, and I modernism to their rightful place in art history. was offered a visiting professorship at But my work as a writer never took precedence Washington University in Saint Louis, which had A study for an extension of the University of Vienna designed in 1966 by Hans Hollein. 09.18.15 / 19:53:24 EDT 03/10 Hollein's interior design for the Marius Retti candleshop (1965) won the R. S. Reynolds Award that year. 09.18.15 / 19:53:24 EDT 04/10 Hans Hollein, Museum Abteiberg, Mnchengladbach, Germany, 1982. 09.18.15 / 19:53:24 EDT a very progressive architecture institute at the to experiment than those who had major time where Aldo van Eyck, Frei Otto, and others commissions to award. For example, I outfitted were teaching. one boutique with an interior made of synthetic ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHUO: So the press response to your first materials. A year after I’d designed the candle exhibition at Galerie nchst St. Stephan and the shop, Beuys knocked on my door in Vienna and catalogue really set your career in motion. said, “You’ve got to become the new architecture ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHH: I’ve always seen the medium of writing professor at the Düsseldorf Academy of Art!” We about exhibitions and catalogues as an 05/10 spent two days together. My candidacy was important multiplier. In this case, it allowed me supported by the artists and opposed by the to spend another year in the United States, architects, and eventually, in 1967, I was where, besides teaching, I pursued my projects appointed professor of architecture. further. When I returned to Vienna, I decided to ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHUO: The next field you then went into was set up shop as an architect. In 1964, Mr. Retti, a museum architecture. manufacturer of candles, asked three architects ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHH: Yes, that was something no architect to submit proposals for the design of a small was interested in at the time. Museums were store, just 150 sq. ft., on Vienna’s Kohlenmarkt seen as fusty institutions. On the and chose my design. The shop was completed in recommendation of Monsignor Mauer, the 1965, and in 1966, it received the R. S. Reynolds director of Galerie nchst St. Stephan, I was Award, then the most highly renowned invited to do an exhibition in the old building of architecture award. My design competed against the municipal museum in Mnchengladbach, skyscrapers by Yamasaki. which had recently held the first Beuys ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHUO: Apparently the store’s microstructure exhibition. Johannes Cladders, the museum’s really impressed people!Ê director, wanted me to create the new building. ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊHH: When Bakema saw it, he said, “But But first I designed Richard Feigen’s gallery in that’s a built manifesto!” And it was, because it New York. Feigen had bought a house in 1967 and wasn’t just a shop, it was an architectural wanted to convert it into a large gallery and statement. Which was very much my intention. private residence.
Recommended publications
  • Pritzker Architecture Prize Laureate

    Pritzker Architecture Prize Laureate

    For publication on or after Monday, March 29, 2010 Media Kit announcing the 2010 PritzKer architecture Prize Laureate This media kit consists of two booklets: one with text providing details of the laureate announcement, and a second booklet of photographs that are linked to downloadable high resolution images that may be used for printing in connection with the announcement of the Pritzker Architecture Prize. The photos of the Laureates and their works provided do not rep- resent a complete catalogue of their work, but rather a small sampling. Contents Previous Laureates of the Pritzker Prize ....................................................2 Media Release Announcing the 2010 Laureate ......................................3-5 Citation from Pritzker Jury ........................................................................6 Members of the Pritzker Jury ....................................................................7 About the Works of SANAA ...............................................................8-10 Fact Summary .....................................................................................11-17 About the Pritzker Medal ........................................................................18 2010 Ceremony Venue ......................................................................19-21 History of the Pritzker Prize ...............................................................22-24 Media contact The Hyatt Foundation phone: 310-273-8696 or Media Information Office 310-278-7372 Attn: Keith H. Walker fax: 310-273-6134 8802 Ashcroft Avenue e-mail: [email protected] Los Angeles, CA 90048-2402 http:/www.pritzkerprize.com 1 P r e v i o u s L a u r e a t e s 1979 1995 Philip Johnson of the United States of America Tadao Ando of Japan presented at Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. presented at the Grand Trianon and the Palace of Versailles, France 1996 1980 Luis Barragán of Mexico Rafael Moneo of Spain presented at the construction site of The Getty Center, presented at Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.
  • Architecture on Display: on the History of the Venice Biennale of Architecture

    Architecture on Display: on the History of the Venice Biennale of Architecture

    archITECTURE ON DIspLAY: ON THE HISTORY OF THE VENICE BIENNALE OF archITECTURE Aaron Levy and William Menking in conversation with: Vittorio Gregotti Paolo Portoghesi Francesco Dal Co Hans Hollein Massimiliano Fuksas Deyan Sudjic Kurt W Forster Richard Burdett Aaron Betsky Kazuyo Sejima Paolo Baratta archITECTUraL assOCIATION LONDON ArchITECTURE ON DIspLAY Architecture on Display: On the History of the Venice Biennale of Architecture ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATION LONDON Contents 7 Preface by Brett Steele 11 Introduction by Aaron Levy Interviews 21 Vittorio Gregotti 35 Paolo Portoghesi 49 Francesco Dal Co 65 Hans Hollein 79 Massimiliano Fuksas 93 Deyan Sudjic 105 Kurt W Forster 127 Richard Burdett 141 Aaron Betsky 165 Kazuyo Sejima 181 Paolo Baratta 203 Afterword by William Menking 5 Preface Brett Steele The Venice Biennale of Architecture is an integral part of contemporary architectural culture. And not only for its arrival, like clockwork, every 730 days (every other August) as the rolling index of curatorial (much more than material, social or spatial) instincts within the world of architecture. The biennale’s importance today lies in its vital dual presence as both register and infrastructure, recording the impulses that guide not only architec- ture but also the increasingly international audienc- es created by (and so often today, nearly subservient to) contemporary architectures of display. As the title of this elegant book suggests, ‘architecture on display’ is indeed the larger cultural condition serving as context for the popular success and 30- year evolution of this remarkable event. To look past its most prosaic features as an architectural gathering measured by crowd size and exhibitor prowess, the biennale has become something much more than merely a regularly scheduled (if at times unpredictably organised) survey of architectural experimentation: it is now the key global embodiment of the curatorial bias of not only contemporary culture but also architectural life, or at least of how we imagine, represent and display that life.
  • 400 Buildings 230 Architects 6 Geographical Regions 80 Countries a U R P E Or Am S Ica Fr a Ce Ia

    400 Buildings 230 Architects 6 Geographical Regions 80 Countries a U R P E Or Am S Ica Fr a Ce Ia

    400 Buildings 100 single houses┆53 schools┆21 art galleries 66 museums┆7 swimming pools┆2 town halls 230 Architects 52 office buildings┆33 unibersities┆5 international 6 Geographical Regions airports21 libraries┆5 embassies┆30 hotels 5 railway staions 80 Countries 80Architects dings Buil 125 ia As O ce an ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS//OMA//FUKSAS//ASYMPTOTE ARCHITECTURE//ANDRÉS ia 6 5 PEREA ARCHITECT//SNØHETTA//BERNARD TSCHUMI//COOP HIMMELB(L)AU//FOSTER + B u i ld in g PARTNERS//UNStudio//laN+//KISHO KUROKAWA ARCHITECT AND ASSOCIATES//STEVEN s s t c e 8 it 0 h A c r HOLL ARCHITECTS//JOHN PORTMAN & ASSOCIATES//3DELUXE//TADAO ANDO ARCHITECT r c A h 0 it e 8 c t s & ASSOCIATES//MVRDV//SAUCIER + PERROTTE ARCHITECTES//ACCONCI STUDIO// s g n i d l i DRIENDL*ARCHITECTS//OGRYDZIAK / PRILLINGER ARCHITECTS//URBAN ENVIRONMENTS u B 5 0 ARCHITECTS//ORTLOS SPACE ENGINEERING//MOSHE SAFDIE AND ASSOCIATES INC.// 2 LOMA //JENSEN & SKODVIN ARKITEKTKONTOR AS+ARNE HENRIKSEN ARKITEKTER AS + e p o C-V HØLMEBAKK ARKITEKT//HENN ARCHITEKTEN//GIENCKE & COMPANY//CHETWOODS r u E A ARCHITECTS//AAARCHITECTEN//ABALOS+SENTKIEWICZ ARQUITECTOS//VARIOUS f r i ARCHITECTS//DENTON CORKER MARSHALL//SAMYN AND PARTNERS//ANTOINE PREDOCK// c a FREE Fernando Romero...... 3 5 s B t c u e i t l i d h i n c r g s A 0 8 8 0 s A g r c n i h d i l t i e u c B t s 0 9 a c i r e m A h t r o N S o u t h A m e r i c s t a c e t i h c r A 0 8 1 s 1 g n 5 i d B l i u ISBN 978-978-12585-2-6 7 8 9 7 8 1 Editorial Department of Global Architecture Practice Editorial Department of Global Architecture
  • C:\Users\Gutschow\Documents\CMU Teaching\Postwar Modern

    C:\Users\Gutschow\Documents\CMU Teaching\Postwar Modern

    Arch. 48-350 -- Postwar Modern Architecture, S’13 Prof. Gutschow, Class #5 DISCUSSION: WHAT IS POSTWAR MODERN? Discuss: Joedicke, J. “Introduction,” Architecture Since 1945 (1969) Goldhagen & Legault, “Introduction: Critical Themes of Postwar Modernism,” in Anxious Modernisms Goldhagen, “Coda: Reconceptualizing Modernism,” in Anxious Modernisms Ockman: “Introduction,” in Architecture Culture, 1943-1968 Differentiate: Prewar Modernism; Postwar Modernism; Postmodernism Critical Themes of Postwar Modernism: Anxiety, Popular Culutre, Consumer Culture, Everyday Life, Anti- Architecture, Democratic Freedom, Homo Ludens (play), Primitivism, Authenticity, Architecture’s History, Regionalism, Place, Skepticism & Infatuation with Technology. Postwar Modern Architects & Pritzker Architecture Prize Laureates 2010: SANAA, Kazuyo Sejima + Ryue Nishizawa of Japan. 2009: Peter Zumthor of Switzerland 2008: Jean Nouvel of France 2007: Richard Rogers of the United Kingdom 2006: Paulo Mendez da Rocha of Brazil 2005: Thom Mayne of the United States 2004: Zaha Hadid of the United Kingdom 2003: Jorn Utzon of Denmark 2002: Glenn Murcutt of Australia 2001: Herzog and de Meuron of Switzerland 2000: Rem Koolhaas of The Netherlands 1999: Norman Foster of the United Kingdom 1998: Renzo Piano of Italy 1997: Sverre Fehn of Norway 1996: Rafael Moneo of Spain presented 1995: Tadao Ando of Japan 1994: Christian de Portzamparc of France 1993: Fumihiko Maki of Japan 1992: Alvaro Siza of Portugal 1991: Robert Venturi of the United States 1990: Aldo Rossi of Italy 1989: Frank O. Gehry of the United States 1988: Gordon Bunshaft of the United States and Oscar Niemeyer of Brazil 1987: Kenzo Tange of Japan 1986: Gottfried Boehm of Germany 1985: Hans Hollein of Austria 1984: Richard Meier of the United States 1983: Ieoh Ming Pei of the United States 1982: Kevin Roche of the United States 1981: James Stirling of Great Britain 1980: Luis Barragan of Mexico 1979: Philip Johnson of the United States.
  • Altelier Hans Hollein Principal Architect(S): Hollein, Hans

    Altelier Hans Hollein Principal Architect(S): Hollein, Hans

    ALTELIER HANS HOLLEIN PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT(S): HOLLEIN, HANS LOCATION: VIENNA, AUSTRIA FIRM OPENED: 1964 EMPLOYEES: 1 FIRM PHILOSOPHY Known as a universal artist, Hollein’s design philosophies are derived from the idea that one must avoid narrow and easily defendable positions to achieve original and quality design. Hollein says that evolution of early design ideas should be re-examined and realized in future work. He believes that design is not a profession to be pigeon-holed, and encourages exploration of the aforementioned design elements in other ways than just architecture. HISTORY Hans Hollein studied architecture and urban planning at the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) in Chicago until 1959. In 1960 he finished his studies at the University of California in Berkeley as Master of Architecture. He established his own solo architectural studio in Vienna in 1964. He has since realized works in Austria, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, Spain, Russia, USA, Peru, and Japan. Hollein used to employ interns to help around the office. However, in 2010 he joined a partnership with ZT-GmbH, another architectural firm, leaving his solo studio to focus on his art and furniture design. His most notable awards include the following: the Pritzker Architecture Prize, 1985; the Reynolds Memorial Award, 1966 and 1984; the Prize of the City of Vienna for Architecture, 1974; the Grand Austrian State Awards, 1983; the Austrian Ehrenzeichen für Wissenschaft und Kunst, 1990; the Goldenes Ehrenzeichen für Verdienste um das Land Wien, 1994; the Grosse Verdienstkreuz des Verdienstordens der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 1997; and the Arnold W. Brunner Memorial Prize of Architecture in New York, 2004.
  • DENTRO LA STRADA NOVISSIMA 20 Facades Designed by 20 Architects Including Frank O

    DENTRO LA STRADA NOVISSIMA 20 Facades Designed by 20 Architects Including Frank O

    DENTRO LA STRADA NOVISSIMA 20 facades designed by 20 architects including Frank O. Gehry, Rem Koolhaas, Hans Hollein, Franco Purini, Arata Isozaki, Robert Venturi, Osvald Mathias Ungers draw the Strada Novissima, the exhibition curated by Paolo Portoghesi at the first Biennale of Architecture in 1980 Today at MAXXI, a focus dedicated to that exhibition is an opportunity to reflect on a crucial moment in the history of twentieth century architecture 07 December 2018 - 29 September 2019 www.maxxi.art | #DentroLaStradaNovissima Rome, 6 December 2018. The First International Architecture Exhibition of the Venice Biennale curated by Paolo Portoghesi opened on 27 July 1980, and was entitled La Presenza del Passato [The Presence of the Past]. During this Biennale, Paolo Portoghesi proposed the exhibition La Strada Novissima, that involved 20 international architects who created 20 life-size facades to activate a reflection on the theme of the road and create a concrete image of a different way of thinking about architecture. Today the MAXXI, after almost forty years, returns to reflect on this theme with the great exhibition The Street. Where the world is made, and the same Portoghesi curates DENTRO LA STRADA NOVISSIMA an in-depth focus on this crucial moment in the history of twentieth century architecture, which started the international discussion on postmodernism. The Focus will be held at the Architecture Archive Centre from 7 December 2018 to 28 April 2019. As a whole, La Strada Novissima proposed a real 70-metre path and 10 life-size facades per side designed by Ricardo Bofill, Costantino Dardi, Frank O. Gehry, Michael Graves, GRAU, Allan Greenberg, Hans Hollein, Arata Isozaki, Josef Paul Kleihues, Rem Koolhaas, Léon Krier, Charles W.
  • Everything Is Architecture Bau Magazine from the 60S and 70S.Pdf

    Everything Is Architecture Bau Magazine from the 60S and 70S.Pdf

    ICA 27 September 2015 29 July – ICA 29 July – 27 September 2015 from the from 60s and 70s Bau Magazine from the from 60s and 70s Bau Magazine Everything is Architecture: Everything is Architecture: This display focuses on the Austrian architectural magazine Bau: Zeitschrift für Architektur und Städtebau (Bau: Magazine for Architecture and Urban Planning). Originally named Der Bau, the magazine was published by the Central Association of Austrian Architects and established in 1925 as a trade publication. From 1965 to 1970, its editorship was taken over by a group of pioneering Austrian artists and architects: Sokratis Dimitriou, Günther Feuerstein, Hans Hollein, Oswald Oberhuber, Gustav Peichl and Walter Pichler. The magazine became a platform for debate, innovation and experimentation within architecture and urban planning but also art, design and politics. It contained several different strands of architectural writing and documentation, from both within Austria and the German-speaking world and the broader international scene. Visual and theoretical essays by the editors helped to bring their pioneering architectural ideas to a wider audience. The architecture of forgotten figures such as Josef Hoffmann, Adolf Loos, Rudolph M. Schindler and Ludwig Wittgenstein was celebrated as a way to readdress the historical amnesia following the Second World War. The magazine also showcased the radical work of a younger generation of Austrian architects such as COOP HIMMELB(L)AU and Haus-Rucker-Co, and helped to provide a window to the major international, architectural and artistic scenes of the time, publishing the work of London-based architectural group Archigram and American architects and artists Buckminster Fuller and Claes Oldenburg.
  • SO-Cover Copy.Indd

    SO-Cover Copy.Indd

    Bricks Politics& What gets built at Harvard, what doesn’t, and why by Joan Wickersham very year, on a hot summer day, 10 Boston-area architects pile into a van together and drive around for hours looking for beauty. Lately, at least, they haven’t been finding it at Harvard. EThey are members of a jury assembled annually by the Boston Society of Architects to award the Harleston Parker Medal, a prize given to the recent building judged to be “the most beautiful.” It’s not the biggest, fanciest award in the world, or even in the world of architecture (that distinction belongs to the Pritzker Prize, sometimes referred to as “the Nobel of architecture”). But the Parker Medal is a good gauge of how architects—who are both the toughest critics and This elegant and austere office building for the Harvard University Library rose at greatest appreciators of one another’s work—view the aes- 90 Mount Auburn Street after the Cambridge Historical Commission rejected a design by Viennese architect Hans Hollein that would thetic quality of what’s being built around Boston. have been a bold, provocative piece of art that might have begun “a new kind of Since 2000, juries have recognized buildings on the Welles- architecture in Harvard Square.” 50 September - October 2007 Photographs by Jim Harrison ley campus twice, at Northeastern University twice, and at MIT York’s Morgan Library—was hired in 1999 to design a new mu- once. The last time a Harvard building was chosen was in 1994: seum for Harvard’s modern art collection.
  • Zgallerymanager MSPM

    Zgallerymanager MSPM

    Thomas Demand ARCHIVMATERIAL / NEW STOP MOTION Sprüth Magers, Berlin November 24, 2018 – January 19, 2019 In the past several years, Thomas Demand has periodically turned his camera away from the models he constructs himself, as content for his well-known photographs, to focus on models he has encountered in the archives and studios of renowned architects. First instigated by the artist’s visits to the John Lautner archives at the Getty Research Institute in Los Angeles, Demand’s Model Studies continued with the paper constructions he photographed at the Tokyo studio of Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa (SANAA). Sprüth Magers is pleased to present ARCHIVMATERIAL, the third iteration of Demand’s contemplative series, which concentrates on models by the Viennese artist-architect Hans Hollein. Also on view NEW STOP MOTION, two of the artist’s mesmerizing stop motion animations completed in 2016 and 2018. A radical thinker and an instigator in the history of postmodern architecture, Hans Hollein (1934–2014) sought to expand the concept of architecture to encompass all forms of environments, from space suits to advertisement spreads to telecommunications systems. As he declared in Bau magazine in 1968: “Architects must cease to think only in terms of buildings... Everyone is an architect. Everything is architecture.” The title of Demand’s exhibition, ARCHIVMATERIAL, is a playful nod to the theoretical seriousness of conceptual manifestos of the 1960s and 1970s, of which Hollein penned his fair share. Presented with the opportunity to explore Hollein’s extensive archives, packed into numerous apartments across Vienna, Demand delved into the architect’s materials.
  • Aedes Architecture Forum Berlin Aedes Architecture Forum

    Aedes Architecture Forum Berlin Aedes Architecture Forum

    Aedes Architecture Forum Berlin Aedes Architecture Forum 3XN architects, 2010 Concept Iñaki Echeverria arquitectos, 2011 More than thirty years ago Kristin Feireiss founded the Aedes Gallery in Berlin. It was the first time that architecture was exhibited and presented as a product of thought processes. Prior to this, the general opinion had been that architecture was merely something to house ex- hibits. The Aedes Gallery introduced the phenomenon of architecture into a specific public domain, bringing urban reality into society in a new way, making it negotiable and political. This new approach to communicate contemporary architecture led to international critical acclaim. Now the Aedes Architecture Forum is one of the world-renowned institutions and cultural brands for built environment, urban planning and associ- ated fields. It has continually stimulated a critical dialogue with the public and has made a signifi- cant contribution to the global discourse regard- ing architecture and urban culture with outstand- ing exhibitions, lectures and conferences. Many significant architects and Pritzker laureates exhibited at Aedes decades before they achieved international fame, including Zaha Hadid, Rem Koolhaas, Herzog & de Meuron, Kazuyo Sejima, Frank Gehry and Wang Shu. Through its approxi- mately 300 displays, publications, and as many events to date, Aedes has provided a platform for the presentation and analysis of avant-garde con- Reception at Aedes am Pfefferberg, 2010 cepts, visions and built projects. The Aedes Network Campus Berlin (ANCB), a trans- disciplinary metropolitan laboratory, is the ultimate product of this recent development. Horizons of Public Housing, Madrid, 2007 Ai Weiwei, 2008 Zaha Hadid, 2000 Find the Gap, 2005 Yona Friedman, 2004 OMA, 2000 A brief History of Venues In 1980 Aedes started at Savignyplatz in Berlin, moved under the railway viaduct in 1988 and ex- tended 1995 to Hackesche Höfe in the new eastern part of the city.
  • Kulturforum Konzept Zur Weiterentwicklung

    Kulturforum Konzept Zur Weiterentwicklung

    Kulturforum Konzept zur Weiterentwicklung Kulturforum Konzept zur Weiterentwicklung Senatsbeschluss (16. März 2004) und Informationen zu Geschichte, Planung und Konzeption Impressum Herausgeber Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung -Kommunikation- Württembergische Str. 6 10707 Berlin www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de Koordination, Konzept und Texte Abteilung Städtebau und Projekte Referat IIA,- städtebauliche Projekte Werner Arndt, Werner Bialluch Graphische Gestaltung Graphic Design - Philipp Eder Druck: Copyhaus Berlin, Juni 2004 2 Inhalt: Seite Geleitwort 5 Senatsbeschluss über die Weiterentwicklung des Kulturforums (16. März 2004) —Schlussbericht an das Abgeordnetenhaus- 7 Zur Weiterentwicklung des Kulturforums Begründung zum Schlussbericht (Dr. Hans Stimmann) 11 Chronologie 20 Informationen zu Geschichte, Planung und Konzeption 23 3 4 Geleitwort Das Kulturforum ist als unfertiges Qualität des öffentlichen Raumes vor Dokument der Nachkriegsmoderne und der Augen. geteilten Stadt bis heute ein Ort, um Wir wollen auf dem Kulturforum dessen zukünftige Gestalt gerungen wird. öffentliche Räume für die Besucherinnen Doch bei allen unterschiedlichen und Besucher und wir wollen, dass diese Auffassungen gibt es einen gemeinsamen Räume die wichtigen architektonischen Nenner: Die derzeitige städtebauliche Momente des Ortes — die St. Matthäus Situation vor allem der öffentlichen Kirche, die Philharmonie, die Neue Freiräume ist unbefriedigend. Das Nationalgalerie und die Staatsbibliothek Kulturforum als einer der anspruchsvollsten miteinander in Beziehung setzen. Zu Orte in der Stadt bedarf einer dieser Idee des Raumes als verbindendes weiterführenden Planung, die den Namen Element gehört, Sichtbeziehungen nicht zu einlöst und den hier versammelten verstellen, sondern „auszustellen“. Daher Institutionen und Architekturen einen ist es uns wichtig, diese Sichtbeziehung angemessenen Raum, ein Forum gibt. von der Plattform der Neuen Nationalgalerie zur Philharmonie frei zu Der Senat hat vor diesem Hintergrund halten.
  • Aldo Rossi Papers, 1943-1999

    Aldo Rossi Papers, 1943-1999

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c85d8tjb No online items Finding aid for the Aldo Rossi papers, 1943-1999 Finding aid prepared by Laura Schroffel Finding aid for the Aldo Rossi 880319 1 papers, 1943-1999 Descriptive Summary Title: Aldo Rossi papers Date (inclusive): 1943-1999 Number: 880319 Creator/Collector: Rossi, Aldo, 1931-1997 Physical Description: 34.0 linear feet(31 boxes, 14 flat file folders, and 1 roll) Repository: The Getty Research Institute Special Collections 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, California, 90049-1688 (310) 440-7390 Abstract: The Aldo Rossi papers contain a selection of works by the prolific architect, writer, artist and theorist. The collection includes notebooks, lectures and course materials, assorted writings and correspondence, drafts for publications, clippings and ephemera. A set of architectural drawings for the Palazzo dei Congressi, Milan (not realized) consisting of preliminary sketches and design plans as well as an architectural design in pencil and oil are also included. Request Materials: Request access to the physical materials described in this inventory through the catalog record for this collection. Click here for the access policy . Language: Collection material is in Italian. Biographical / Historical Note One of the most important Italian architects of the second half of the 20th century Aldo Rossi is considered by some to be an integral author of the postmodern movement of architecture. Rossi received international acclaim not just as an architect but also as a designer, artist and theorist. Rossi was born in 1931 in Milan. He began his studies in architecture in 1949 at Milan Polytechnic.