Newsletter Editor: D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Life History and Production of Mayflies, Stoneflies, and Caddisflies (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) in a Spring-Fe
Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen 1083 Life history and production of mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) in a spring-fed stream in Prince Edward Island, Canada: evidence for population asynchrony in spring habitats? Michelle Dobrin and Donna J. Giberson Abstract: We examined the life history and production of the Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) commu- nity along a 500-m stretch of a hydrologically stable cold springbrook in Prince Edward Island during 1997 and 1998. Six mayfly species (Ephemeroptera), 6 stonefly species (Plecoptera), and 11 caddisfly species (Trichoptera) were collected from benthic and emergence samples from five sites in Balsam Hollow Brook. Eleven species were abundant enough for life-history and production analysis: Baetis tricaudatus, Cinygmula subaequalis, Epeorus (Iron) fragilis,andEpeorus (Iron) pleuralis (Ephemeroptera), Paracapnia angulata, Sweltsa naica, Leuctra ferruginea, Amphinemura nigritta,and Nemoura trispinosa (Plecoptera), and Parapsyche apicalis and Rhyacophila brunnea (Trichoptera). Life-cycle timing of EPT taxa in Balsam Hollow Brook was generally similar to other literature reports, but several species showed extended emergence periods when compared with other studies, suggesting a reduction in synchronization of life-cycle timing, pos- sibly as a result of the thermal patterns in the stream. Total EPT secondary production (June 1997 to May 1998) was 2.74–2.80 g·m–2·year–1 dry mass (size-frequency method). Mayflies were dominant, with a production rate of 2.2 g·m–2·year–1 dry mass, followed by caddisflies at 0.41 g·m–2·year–1 dry mass, and stoneflies at 0.19 g·m–2·year–1 dry mass. -
Stonefly (Plecoptera) Collecting at Sagehen Creek Field Station, Nevada County, California During the Ninth North American Plecoptera Symposium
Two new plecopterologists, Audrey Harrison and Kelly Nye (Mississippi College) sampling at Big Spring, a famous stonefly collecting site in California. If one looks closely, Sierraperla cora (Needham & Smith) and Soliperla sierra Stark are running about. Dr. R. Edward DeWalt, one of the hosts of NAPS-10 in 2012. Article: Stonefly (Plecoptera) Collecting at Sagehen Creek Field Station, Nevada County, California During the Ninth North American Plecoptera Symposium Boris C. Kondratieff1, Jonathan J. Lee2 and Richard W. Baumann3 1Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 E-mail: [email protected]. 22337 15th Street, Eureka, CA 95501 E-mail: [email protected] 11 3Department of Biology, Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 E-mail: [email protected] The Ninth North American Plecoptera Symposium was held at the University of California’s Berkeley Sagehen Creek Field Station from 22 to 25 June 2009. The rather close proximity of Sagehen Creek to the actual meeting site (less than 100 m away) surely encouraged collecting of stoneflies. Sagehen Creek Field Station is located on the eastern slope of the northern Sierra Nevada Mountains of California, approximately 32 km north of Lake Tahoe. The Field Station occupies 183 ha. Sagehen Creek itself extends about 13 km from the headwater on Carpenter Ridge, east of the Sierra Crest to Stampede Reservoir on the Little Truckee River. The stream is fed by springs, fens, and other wetlands. The Sagehen Basin spans a significant precipitation gradient resulting in variation of stream flow. Sheldon and Jewett (1967) and Rademacher et al. -
Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Designation As Species of Conservation Concern Inyo National Forest
Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Designation as Species of Conservation Concern Inyo National Forest Prepared by: Wildlife Biologists and Natural Resources Specialist Regional Office, Inyo National Forest, and Washington Office Enterprise Program for: Inyo National Forest August 2018 1 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. -
Arthropod Prey for Riparian Associated Birds in Headwater Forests of the Oregon Coast Range ⇑ Joan C
Forest Ecology and Management 285 (2012) 213–226 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Arthropod prey for riparian associated birds in headwater forests of the Oregon Coast Range ⇑ Joan C. Hagar a, , Judith Li b,1, Janel Sobota b,1, Stephanie Jenkins c,2 a US Geological Survey Forest & Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States b Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries & Wildlife, Nash Hall, Room #104, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-3803, United States c Oregon State University, Department of Forest Ecosystems & Society, 321 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States article info abstract Article history: Headwater riparian areas occupy a large proportion of the land base in Pacific Northwest forests, and thus Received 11 May 2012 are ecologically and economically important. Although a primary goal of management along small head- Received in revised form 16 August 2012 water streams is the protection of aquatic resources, streamside habitat also is important for many ter- Accepted 19 August 2012 restrial wildlife species. However, mechanisms underlying the riparian associations of some terrestrial Available online 21 September 2012 species have not been well studied, particularly for headwater drainages. We investigated the diets of and food availability for four bird species associated with riparian habitats in montane coastal forests Keywords: of western Oregon, USA. We examined variation in the availability of arthropod prey as a function of dis- Aquatic-terrestrial interface tance from stream. Specifically, we tested the hypotheses that (1) emergent aquatic insects were a food Arthropod prey Forest birds source for insectivorous birds in headwater riparian areas, and (2) the abundances of aquatic and terres- Headwater streams trial arthropod prey did not differ between streamside and upland areas during the bird breeding season. -
Insecta, Plecoptera) of Maryland, Including New and Emended State Records and an Updated State Checklist
Grubbs, S.A. 2018. An update on the stonefly fauna (Insecta, Plecoptera) of Maryland, including new and emended state records and an updated state checklist. Illiesia, 14(04):65-80. https://doi.org/10.25031/2018/14.04 http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D522B9EC-BAA9-49FD-AC24- 01BFF6627203 AN UPDATE ON THE STONEFLY FAUNA (INSECTA, PLECOPTERA) OF MARYLAND, INCLUDING NEW AND EMENDED STATE RECORDS AND AN UPDATED STATE CHECKLIST Scott A. Grubbs1 1 Department of Biology and Center for Biodiversity Studies, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky 42101, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The stonefly fauna of Maryland is updated. An unassociated female of Perlesta Banks, 1906 is described under informal designation, complete with light microscopy micrographs of head and pronotal pigmentation patterns plus scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of eggs. New state records are presented for Cultus verticalis (Banks, 1920), Neoperla catharae Stark & Baumann, 1978, and P. mihucorum Kondratieff & Myers, 2011. Light microscopy and SEM micrographs are also presented for P. mihucorum. Published state records of Isoperla Banks, 1906 and Sweltsa onkos (Ricker, 1952) are emended given recent descriptions in both genera. Distribution maps for S. onkos and S. hoffmani Kondratieff & Kirchner, 2009, plus for all species of Isoperla and Perlesta known to occur in the Appalachian Mountain region of western Maryland, are provided. An updated state checklist of 114 species is included. Keywords: Plecoptera, Perlidae, Perlesta, state records, Maryland INTRODUCTION on the Maryland fauna have been included in Information on the stonefly fauna of Maryland systematic treatments of Allocapnia Claassen, 1928 was based initially on the species lists in Duffield & (Grubbs & Sheldon 2008), Leuctra Stephens, 1836 Nelson (1990) and Grubbs (1997), and now easily (Grubbs 2015, Grubbs & Wei 2017), Prostoia Ricker, searchable as a “Faunal list” in DeWalt et al. -
AQUATIC INSECTS International Journal of Freshwater Entomology
Reprint from: AQUATIC INSECTS International Journal of Freshwater Entomology Founder J. lilies Editor P. Zwick Editorial Board: M. Brancucci, Basel, Switzerland E.J. Fittkau, Miinchen, Germany O.S. Flint Jr., Washington, D.C., USA H.B.N. Hynes, Waterloo, Canada M. Jach, Wien, Austria T. Kawai, Nara, Japan I.M. Levanidova, Vladivostok, USSR H. Malicky, Lunz am See, Austria W.L. Peters, Tallahassee, FL, USA J. Schwoefbel, Konstanz, Germany K.W. Stewart, Denton, TX, USA F. Vaillant, Montbonnot, France P. Zwick, Schlitz, Germany Published by SWETS & ZEITLINGER B.V. - LISSE Aquatic Insects, Vol. 9 (1987). No. 4, pp. 229-251 0165-0424/87/0904-0229 $ 3.00 ©Swets & Zeitlinger The Exopterygote Insect Community of a Mountain Stream in North Carolina, USA: Life Histories, Production, and Functional Structure by Alexander D. HURYN and J. Bruce WALLACE HURYN, A. D. and J. B. WALLACE: The Exopterygote Insect Community of a Mountain Stream in North Carolina, USA: Life Histories, Production, and Functional Structure. Aquatic Insects, Vol. 9 (1987). No. 4, pp. 229-251. Life histories and production of the Exopterygota inhabiting a first to second order mountain stream in North Carolina, USA, were studied by replicated monthly sampling of three different habitats (BO = boulder-outcrop, R = riffle, PL = pool). Life histories were diverse, ranging from multi-voltine (e.g. Baetis) to semi-voltine (e.g. Leuctra ferruginea, Sweltsa lateralis). Habitat-weighted annual production was 1862 mg (ash-free dry weight)/m2 with > 50% being based on four taxa (of 21 considered): Serratella sp. (16%), Peltoperlidae (16%), Leuctra spp. (13%), andJBeloneuria spp. (8%). The Odonata, Ephemeroptera, and Plecop- tera contributed 36, 760, and 1066 mg/m to annual production, respectively. -
PERLA No. 22, 2004
P E R L A Newsletter and Bibliography o f the International Society of Plecopterologists PERLA No. 22,2004 Aquatic Entomology Laboratory Department of Biological Sciences University of North Texas Denton, Texas 76203 PERLA Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of the International Society of Plecopterologists Available on Request to the Managing Editor MANAGING EDITOR: Kenneth IV. Stewart Department of Biological Sciences University of North Texas PO Box 305220 Denton, Texas 76203-5220 USA Fax: 940-565-3821 E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD: R ich ard W. Baumann Department of Zoology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84602, USA Peter P. Harper Département de Sciences biologiques Université de Montréal C.P. 6128, Suce. "Centre-Ville" Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, CANADA Boris C Kondratieff Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA la n D. M cLeüan P. O. Box 95 Westport, NEW ZEALAND Shigekazu Uchida Lake Briwa Museum 1091 Oroshimo Rusatsu 525, JAPAN Peter Zwick Limnologische Fluss-Station Max-Planck-Institut für Limnologie Postfach 260 D-36105 Schlitz, GERMANY EDITORIAL ASSISTANT AND COPY EDITOR: Francene Stewart , Denton, Texas COVER ILLUSTRATION The cover illustration is an Isocapnia and an Acroneuria Nymph habitus from the frontispiece of the 2002 Second Edition of “Nymphs of North American Stonefly Genera (Plecoptera)” by K. W. Stewart and B. P. Stark. i TABLE OF CONTENTS PERLA Subscription Policy ..................................................... 1 History of International Plecoptera Symposia .................... 2 Announcement of 2004 Joint Mayfly a n d .............................3 Stonefly Meetings (Montana) Report on the Seventh North American ...........................4-14 Plecoptera Symposium and Photos History on North American Plecoptera .............................15 Society Meeting Obituary of Dr. -
Qt2cd0m6cp Nosplash 6A8244
International Advances in the Ecology, Zoogeography, and Systematics of Mayflies and Stoneflies Edited by F. R. Hauer, J. A. Stanford and, R. L. Newell International Advances in the Ecology, Zoogeography, and Systematics of Mayflies and Stoneflies Edited by F. R. Hauer, J. A. Stanford, and R. L. Newell University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Publications in Entomology, Volume 128 Editorial Board: Rosemary Gillespie, Penny Gullan, Bradford A. Hawkins, John Heraty, Lynn S. Kimsey, Serguei V. Triapitsyn, Philip S. Ward, Kipling Will University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2008 by The Regents of the University of California Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data International Conference on Ephemeroptera (11th : 2004 : Flathead Lake Biological Station, The University of Montana) International advances in the ecology, zoogeography, and systematics of mayflies and stoneflies / edited by F.R. Hauer, J.A. Stanford, and R.L. Newell. p. cm. – (University of California publications in entomology ; 128) "Triennial Joint Meeting of the XI International Conference on Ephemeroptera and XV International Symposium on Plecoptera held August 22-29, 2004 at Flathead Lake Biological Station, The University of Montana, USA." – Pref. Includes bibliographical references and index. -
PLECOPTERA (Stoneflies) with Special Reference to Those Found in Utah Prepared By: L
ORDER: PLECOPTERA (stoneflies) with special reference to those found in Utah prepared by: L. K. Hapairai, R. L. Johnson, October 2006 revised by: S. W. Judson, September 2008 Diagnosing Features, adults: hind wing usually has large anal lobe soft-bodied and flattened wings reticulated and fold flat over abdomen (Fig. 1) fore wings elongated and narrow long antennae tarsi usually 3-segmented chewing mouth parts Diagnosing Features, nymphs: flattened, generalized insect two tarsal claws (Fig. 2) two cerci (Fig. 3) wing pads usually present, especially in older nymphs long antennae Habitat: near streams or rocky lake shores, nymphs are aquatic Trophic Habits: some detritivores (shredders and more), others predators (but collectors as young) Development: hemimetabolous Preservation: alcohol, for both nymphs and adults. Notes: Stoneflies are indicators of the quality of aquatic habitats. The northern hemisphere families are often divided into two “groups”: the Euholognatha with glossa and paraglossa of equal length, and the Systellognatha with the paraglossa much larger than the glossa. In this classification care must be taken because the Peltoperlidae and Pteronarcyidae have the paraglossa and glossa of equal length, but are often placed in the Systellognatha for other reasons. The following treatments are arranged by Suborders and overall similarity of families within the suborders placed adjacently. Appendix A is a species list by UT counties. Figures: . `` Figure 1. Wings folded flat Figure 2. Two tarsal claws. Figure 3. Two cerci. Phot by CRNelson. Photo by SWJudson. Photo from Invertebrate ID CD. SUBORDER: EUHOLOGNATHA Paraglossae and glossae of equal length. (Fig. 4) Figure 4. Paraglossae and glossae equal. -
Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum
Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum LIST OF FAUNA KNOWN TO OCCUR ON FORT DRUM as of January 2017. Federally listed species are noted with FT (Federal Threatened) and FE (Federal Endangered); state listed species are noted with SSC (Species of Special Concern), ST (State Threatened, and SE (State Endangered); introduced species are noted with I (Introduced). INSECT SPECIES Except where otherwise noted all insect and invertebrate taxonomy based on (1) Arnett, R.H. 2000. American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of North America North of Mexico, 2nd edition, CRC Press, 1024 pp; (2) Marshall, S.A. 2013. Insects: Their Natural History and Diversity, Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY, 732 pp.; (3) Bugguide.net, 2003-2017, http://www.bugguide.net/node/view/15740, Iowa State University. ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA--Mayflies Taxonomy based on (1) Peckarsky, B.L., P.R. Fraissinet, M.A. Penton, and D.J. Conklin Jr. 1990. Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Cornell University Press. 456 pp; (2) Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and M.B. Berg 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th Edition. Kendall Hunt Publishing. 1158 pp. FAMILY LEPTOPHLEBIIDAE—Pronggillled Mayflies FAMILY BAETIDAE—Small Minnow Mayflies Habrophleboides sp. Acentrella sp. Habrophlebia sp. Acerpenna sp. Leptophlebia sp. Baetis sp. Paraleptophlebia sp. Callibaetis sp. Centroptilum sp. FAMILY CAENIDAE—Small Squaregilled Mayflies Diphetor sp. Brachycercus sp. Heterocloeon sp. Caenis sp. Paracloeodes sp. Plauditus sp. FAMILY EPHEMERELLIDAE—Spiny Crawler Procloeon sp. Mayflies Pseudocentroptiloides sp. Caurinella sp. Pseudocloeon sp. Drunela sp. Ephemerella sp. FAMILY METRETOPODIDAE—Cleftfooted Minnow Eurylophella sp. Mayflies Serratella sp. -
Maryland Biological Stream Survey’S Sentinel Site Network: a Multi-Purpose Monitoring Program
Maryland Biological Stream Survey’s Sentinel Site Network: A Multi-purpose Monitoring Program Prepared by Andrew J. Becker Scott A. Stranko Ronald J. Klauda Anthony P. Prochaska John D. Schuster Michael T. Kashiwagi Patrick H. Graves Maryland Department of Natural Resources Resource Assessment Service Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue C-2 Annapolis MD 21401 Prepared for Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service Natural Heritage Program 580 Taylor Avenue E-1 Annapolis MD 21401 April, 2010 This study was funded in part by State Wildlife Grant funds provided to State wildlife agencies by the U.S. Congress, and administered through the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ Natural Heritage Program - - 1 ABSTRACT Each year since 2000, the Maryland Biological Stream Survey, led by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (MDDNR), Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division, monitors several high quality reference streams in the Sentinel Site Network (SSN) to assess annual variability in stream conditions associated with natural factors. Data are collected on the biology, chemistry, physical habitat, water and air temperature, and land cover/use at each Sentinel Site. The major goal of this report is to describe the temporal variability in conditions at 27 SSN streams based on 10 years of annual sampling, 2000 through 2009. The secondary goal of this report is to present biological indicators as parts in a tool box of assessment parameters that could be used to track climate change effects on Maryland’s non-tidal streams, and to conduct exploratory analyses of SSN data from the 10-year baseline of stream conditions against which future climate influences can be assessed. -
Surveys to Determine the Status of the Northern
SURVEYS TO DETERMINE THE STATUS OF THE NORTHERN FORESTFLY (LEDNIA BOREALIS) AND RAINIER ROACHFLY (SOLIPERLA FENDERI) ON THE OKANOGAN-WENATCHEE AND GIFFORD PINCHOT NATIONAL FORESTS OF WASHINGTON: YEAR 2 FINAL REPORT FROM THE XERCES SOCIETY TO THE INTERAGENCY SPECIAL STATUS / SENSITIVE SPECIES PROGRAM (ISSSSP) Assistance Agreement L13AC00102, Modification 4 Alpine creek near Rampart Lakes in the Alpine Lakes Wilderness, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, WA BY CANDACE FALLON, MICHELE BLACKBURN, AND EMILIE BLEVINS THE XERCES SOCIETY FOR INVERTEBRATE CONSERVATION MARCH 2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Lednia borealis ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Soliperla fenderi ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Site Selection ............................................................................................................................................................